“I just think that we should be informed” a qualitative study of family involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes

Background

As part of the research project “End-of-life Communication in Nursing Homes. Patient Preferences and Participation”, we have studied how Advance Care Planning (ACP) is carried out in eight Norwegian nursing homes. The concept of ACP is a process for improving patient autonomy and communication in the context of progressive illness, anticipated deterioration and end-of-life care. While an individualistic autonomy based attitude is at the fore in most studies on ACP, there is a lack of empirical studies on how family members’ participation and involvement in ACP- conversations may promote nursing home patients’ participation in decisions on future treatment and end-of-life care. Based on empirical data and family ethics perspectives, the purpose of this study is to add insights to the complexity of ACP-conversations and illuminate how a family ethics perspective may improve the quality of the ACP and promote nursing home patients’ participation in advance care planning.

Methods

Participant observations of ACP-conversations in eight nursing homes. The observations were followed by interviews with patients and relatives together on how they experienced being part of the conversation, and expressing their views on future medical treatment, hospitalization and end-of-life issues.

Results

We found that the way nursing home patients and relatives are connected and related to each other, constitutes an intertwined unit. Further, we found that relatives’ involvement and participation in ACP- conversations is significant to uncover, and give the nursing home staff insight into, what is important in the nursing home patient’s life at the time. The third analytical theme is patients’ and relatives’ shared experiences of the dying and death of others. Drawing on past experiences can be a way of introducing or talking about death.

Conclusions

An individual autonomy approach in advance care planning should be complemented with a family ethics approach. To be open to family ethics when planning for the patient’s future in the nursing home is to be open to diversity and nuances and to the significance of the patient’s former life and experiences.

     

Effects of advance care planning on confidence in surrogates’ ability to make healthcare decisions consistent with older adults’ wishes: Findings from a randomized controlled trial

Objective

To investigate how confidence in surrogates’ ability to make consistent decisions in the future change over time, in the context of an ACP intervention that did not improve surrogates’ ability to predict an older adult’s hypothetical treatment preferences.

“Heart failure in COVID-19 patients: Critical care experience”: A letter to the editor

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) of all categories of ejection fraction (EF), but mainly in patients with HF with reduced EF. Moreover, cardiac transplant patients exhibit worse cardiovascular prognosis, high mortality, and more admissions to the intensive care unit. In general, COVID-19 seems to de-teriorate the clinical status of HF and favors the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure, especially in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, kidney dysfunction, and older age. COVID-19 may induce new-onset HF with complex mechanisms that involve myocardial injury. Indeed, myocardial injury comprises a large category of detrimental effects for the myocardium, such as myocardial infarction type 1 or type 2, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, microvascular dysfunction and myocarditis, which are not easily distinguished by HF. The pathophysiologic mechanisms mainly involve direct myocardial damage by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, cytokine storm, hypercoagulation, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. The proper management of patients with COVID-19 involves careful patient evaluation and ongoing monitoring for complications such as HF.     

One additional educational session in inhaler use to patients with COPD in primary health care – A controlled clinical trial

ObjectiveTo investigate whether one additional educational session about inhaler use, delivered to patients with COPD in primary healthcare, could affect the patients’ skills in inhaler use. Specifically, to study the effects on errors related to handling the device, to inhalation technique, and to both.MethodsThis nonrandomized controlled clinical trial included 64 patients who used devices and made errors. COPD nurses assessed inhaler use using a checklist and educated patients. Intervention group received one additional educational session after two weeks.ResultsAt baseline, patients in the IG had more devices (n = 2,1) compared to patients in the CG (n = 1,6) (p = 0.003). No other statistically significant differences were seen at baseline. At follow-up, intervention group showed a lower proportion of patients who made errors related to handling the device (p = 0.006). No differences were seen in the other categories.ConclusionOne additional educational session in inhaler use for patients with COPD was effective in reducing the proportion of patients making errors related to handling of their devices.Practice implications:Categorization of errors might help healthcare professionals to assess the suitability of patients’ devices, tailor patient education, and thus improve patient health.     

Women’s experiences of referral to a domestic violence advocate in UK primary care settings: a service-user collaborative study

Background

Women experiencing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are more likely to be in touch with health services than any other agency, yet doctors and nurses rarely ask about abuse, often failing to identify signs of DVA in their patients.

Aim

To understand women’s experience of disclosure of DVA in primary care settings and subsequent referral to a DVA advocate in the context of a DVA training and support programme for primary care clinicians: Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS).

Design and setting

A service-user collaborative study using a qualitative study design. Recruitment was from across IRIS trial settings in Bristol and Hackney, London.

Method

Twelve women who had been referred to one of two specialist DVA advocates (based at specialist DVA agencies) were recruited by a GP taking part in IRIS. Women were interviewed by a survivor of DVA and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was thematic using constant comparison.

Results

GPs and nurses can play an important role in identifying women experiencing DVA and referring them to DVA specialist agencies. GPs may also have an important role to play in helping women maintain any changes they make as a result of referral to an advocate, by asking about DVA in subsequent consultations.

Conclusion

A short time interval between a primary care referral and initial contact with an advocate was valued by some women. For the initial contact with an advocate to happen as soon as possible after a primary care referral has been made, a close working relationship between primary care and the third sector needs to be cultivated.     

A longitudinal study of usability in health care: does time heal?

We report from a longitudinal laboratory-based usability evaluation of a health care information system. The purpose of the study was to inquire into the nature of usability problems experienced by novice and expert users, and to see to what extend usability problems of a health care information system may or may not disappear over time, as the nurses get more familiar with it-if time heals poor design? As our method for studying this, we conducted a longitudinal study with two key studies. A usability evaluation was conducted with novice users when an electronic patient record system was being deployed in a large hospital. After the nurses had used the system in their daily work for 15 months, we repeated the evaluation. Our results show that time does not heal. Although some problems were not experiences as severe, they still remained after 1 year of extensive use. On the basis of our findings, we discuss implications for evaluating usability in health care.     

Knee joint changes in patients with neglected developmental hip dysplasia: A prospective case–control study

BackgroundFew reports are available describing knee changes in neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of this study was to assess the radiographic morphology of knee joints in adults with neglected DDH.MethodsThirty-seven patients (35 females and two males) with neglected DDH were prospectively recruited with an average age of 32.6 years. Twenty-three patients had unilateral and 14 patients had bilateral neglected DDH. Thirty-seven healthy individuals were recruited to form a matched control group. Three groups of knee joints were examined: affected knees (on the same side of the neglected DDH), unaffected knees (contralateral to the neglected DDH in patients with unilateral involvement), and control knees. A series of radiographic parameters of the knee joint were measured in the coronal and sagittal plane, and they were compared between patients and normal controls.ResultsIn the coronal plane, the affected knees had increased valgus angulation related to increased height of the medial femoral condyle, decreased height of the lateral femoral condyle and decreased lateral distal femoral angle compared to control knees. In the sagittal plane, both distal femoral and proximal tibial joints of the affected knees developed a decrease in posterior angles. Additionally, the unaffected knees also developed radiographic changes compared to control knees.ConclusionsPatients with neglected DDH may develop changes in both knee joints. These changes should be considered during surgery to the hip, femur and knee to prevent potential complications.Level of evidenceLevel 2.     

A follow-up study of psychiatric consultations in the general hospital: What happens to patients after discharge?

BACKGROUND: An appropriate follow-up is considered essential in the consultation-liaison psychiatry setting, but it is often neglected. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the psychiatric consultation process in the general hospital, by investigating what occurred to patients 3-5 months after discharge. METHODS: We used a three-part questionnaire: (1) the results of the consultation process; (2) a telephone interview with patients, and (3) a telephone interview with the patients' primary care physician, to whom the patients were referred after discharge from hospital. We contacted all consecutive, unselected patients referred to psychiatric consultation from January to July 1999. Complete data were available for 119 patients from an initial group of 318. RESULTS: The consultation process was well accepted by patients and useful to general hospital physicians to complete the final diagnosis of the patient when discharged from hospital. In most cases (78.9%), the psychiatric letter was attached to the discharge letter. The second part of the questionnaire indicated that most patients were satisfied with the consultation process. They thought it helped focus their problems and 60% asserted that they felt better after following their psychiatrists' instructions or therapy. The primary care physicians agreed with the diagnostic results of the psychiatric consultation, mainly followed the psychiatrists' advice, and generally expressed positive comments about the consultation-liaison service. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance of hospital physicians, patients, and primary care physicians was good. Follow-up studies on outcome of psychiatric consultations are few and further analysis is strongly recommended.     

The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus with mucoid phenotype in the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis—A prospective study

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most frequently isolated pathogens in the respiratory tract of CF patients. Recently, we characterized peculiar mucoid S. aureus isolates, which are excessive biofilm formers and which carried a 5bp-deletion within the intergenic region of the ica operon. In this prospective study, we determined the prevalence of mucoid S. aureus-isolates in the airways of CF-patients during a 3-months period.Methods: We analyzed specimens (sputa, throat swabs) from 81 CF patients who attended two CF centers in Münster, Germany. Ten S. aureus isolates were randomly picked from every S. aureus-positive airway specimen and evaluated for mucoidy using Congo Red agar and phenotypic tests. Mucoid isolates were characterized by spa sequence typing, biofilm production and sequencing of the intergenic region of the ica operon to screen for the 5bp-deletion.Results: In 7 of 81 examined patients (8.6%), we detected mucoid S. aureus phenotypes (37 out of 1050 isolates; 3.5%). Twenty-five mucoid isolates carried the 5bp-deletion. Mucoid isolates produced excessive biofilm and were significantly more resistant to certain antibiotics.Conclusions: In our prospective study, mucoid S. aureus was present in 8.6% of S. aureus–positive CF-patients. In 6 of 7 patients, mucoid isolates carried the 5bp-deletion, indicating that also other so far not identified mechanisms cause excessive biofilm formation. Further studies are necessary to ascertain the clinical impact of mucoid S. aureus phenotypes on the severity of the CF disease.     

Self-Determination Theory to observe healthcare professionals’ counselling in chronic care encounters: Development of the COUNSEL-CCE tool

ObjectiveTo develop and psychometrically evaluate an observation tool to rate healthcare professionals’ engagement in need-supportive and need-thwarting counselling in chronic care encounters.MethodsThe observation tool was developed through three stages (January 2018 – June 2019). First, a set of items was developed according to essential components of need-supportive and need-thwarting counselling as identified in Self-Determination Theory. Second, content validation by five experts. Third, ecological validation using video-recorded real-life consultations. For the psychometric evaluation (June – October 2019), the tool was used by three observers to code 55 units of real-life encounters.ResultsThe Coding and Observing Need-Supportive Counselling in Chronic Care Encounters (COUNSEL-CCE) consists of 44 items clustered into nine theoretically underpinned behavioural approaches. Psychometric testing indicated acceptable to good consistency in scoring between observers and strong consistency within observers.ConclusionThe COUNSEL-CCE captures person-oriented alongside process-oriented aspects during chronic care encounters. A person-oriented approach expresses counselling that is responsive to individual preferences and needs, whereas a process-oriented approach indicates the necessity to support competency building within patients, and is more instrumental of nature.Practice implicationsCOUNSEL-CCE is a valuable observation tool to assess (graduate) healthcare professionals’ counselling style and address if, and how, counselling evolves as a result of professional training.     

Clinicians’ accounts of communication with patients in end-of-life care contexts: A systematic review

ObjectiveCommunication between patients and end-of-life care providers requires sensitivity given the context and complexity involved. This systematic review uses a narrative approach to synthesise clinicians’ understandings of communication in end-of-life care.MethodsA systematic, narrative synthesis approach was adopted given the heterogeneity across the 83 included studies. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019125155). Medline was searched for all articles catalogued with the MeSH terms “palliative care,” “terminal care” or “end-of-life care,” and “communication”. Articles were assessed for quality using a modified JQI-QARI tool.ResultsThe findings highlight the centrality and complexity of communication in end-of-life care. The challenges identified by clinicians in relation to such communication include the development of skills necessary, complexity of interpersonal interactions, and ways in which organisational factors impact upon communication. Clinicians are also aware of the need to develop strategies for interdisciplinary teams to improve communication.ConclusionTraining needs for effective communication in end-of-life contexts are not currently being met.Practice ImplicationsClinicians need more training to address the lack of skills to overcome interactional difficulties. Attention is also needed to address issues in the organisational contexts in which such communication occurs.     

Out of sight,out of mind? A qualitative study of patients’ perspectives on cross-border healthcare in a European border region

ObjectiveTo improve our understanding of patients’ needs in cross-border healthcare, with a specific focus on handover.MethodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted narrative interviews with 8 patients who had experienced cross-border healthcare, including handover. Based on an inductive analysis, we crafted stories representing participants’ perspectives. Crafted stories attend to the personal character of patients’ experiences.ResultsWe crafted 3 stories relating patients’ cross-border healthcare pathways. We identified 3 recurring issues in these stories: (1) Patient involvement in the decision-making process regarding their healthcare; (2) Communication with their healthcare providers; and (3) Information throughout the healthcare process.ConclusionThe said issues, albeit no novelty in healthcare, seem to be amplified by cross-border barriers, such as system, language, and cultural differences. To empower patients to be involved in their own healthcare process, these issues should become a topic of conversation between patients and healthcare professionals.Practice implicationsThe patient stories in this article could help raise awareness among professionals and patients about the issues patients face in cross-border healthcare. Awareness is a first step in overcoming these issues.     

A multinational study of colonization with extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare personnel and family members of carrier patients hospitalized in rehabilitation centres

The study aims were: (i) to define the prevalence of and risk factors for colonization by extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) -producing Enterobacteriaceae (EPE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) and family members (FMs) of EPE-colonized patients in rehabilitation units and (ii) to compare EPE isolates from these three groups. The study included 286 FMs of 194 EPE-carrying patients identified in five rehabilitation units located in Israel, Italy, France and Spain. The EPE were detected in rectal swabs from 26 (9%) of 286 FMs screened. In multivariate analyses, older age of FM, greater mean number of hours spent with the patient, being a daughter or a female spouse of a patient, and chronic lung disease of the patient were significantly associated with carriage in the FM. Escherichia coli was the most common organism (76%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (19%). Isolates were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing, and ESBLs were identified by PCR sequencing. A comparison of paired species isolates from FMs and their respective patient showed that 17 of 23 strains were indistinguishable. EPE were detected in 35 (3.5%, E. coli = 34) of the 1001 HCWs screened. Feeding patients was associated with EPE carriage by HCWs. Only 7 of 23 E. coli subclones cultured from HCWs were also represented among 376 patient-derived ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from the same rehabilitation units. In Spain, a higher proportion of HCWs and FMs were ESBL carriers than elsewhere (p <0.05). In conclusion, the molecular and epidemiological data suggest that FMs are at higher risk of EPE acquisition from their relative patients than HCWs.     

Factors predisposing to acute and recurrent bacterial non-necrotizing cellulitis in hospitalized patients: a prospective case–control study

Acute non-necrotizing cellulitis is a skin infection with a tendency to recur. Both general and local risk factors for erysipelas or cellulitis have been recognized in previous studies using hospitalized controls. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for cellulitis using controls recruited from the general population. We also compared patients with a history of previous cellulitis with those suffering a single episode, with regard to the risk factors: length of stay in hospital, duration of fever, and inflammatory response as measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) level and leukocyte count. Ninety hospitalized cellulitis patients and 90 population controls matched for age and sex were interviewed and clinically examined during the period April 2004 to March 2005. In multivariate analysis, chronic oedema of the extremity, disruption of the cutaneous barrier and obesity were independently associated with acute cellulitis. Forty-four (49%) patients had a -positive history (PH) of at least one cellulitis episode before entering the study. Obesity and previous ipsilateral surgical procedure were statistically significantly more common in PH patients, whereas a recent (<1 month) traumatic wound was more common in patients with a negative history (NH) of cellulitis. PH patients had longer duration of fever and hospital stay, and their CRP and leukocyte values more often peaked at a high level than those of NH patients. Oedema, broken skin and obesity are risk factors for acute cellulitis. The inflammatory response as indicated by CRP level and leukocyte count is statistically significantly more severe in PH than NH patients.     

Effect of eribulin on epithelial–mesenchymal transition plasticity in metastatic breast cancer: An exploratory,prospective study

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in cancer metastasis and treatment resistance, which worsens prognosis. In phase III trials, eribulin improved overall survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In preclinical studies, eribulin suppressed EMT. However, clinical data on the use of eribulin for MBC patients are limited. In this exploratory, prospective study, we examined the effect of eribulin on EMT in MBC patients. Twenty-two patients aged 44–82 years with recurrent breast cancer or MBC were treated with eribulin. Breast cancer tissue samples were obtained before treatment and on Day 15 ± 5 of the first cycle of eribulin treatment. EMT markers (E-cadherin, claudin-3, vimentin, and N-cadherin) were analyzed using western blotting. EMT changes were evaluated based on the ratio of epithelial to mesenchymal markers before and after treatment in individual tumors. E-cadherin/vimentin, claudin-3/vimentin, E-cadherin/N-cadherin, and claudin-3/N-cadherin ratios were significantly higher after treatment (p = .007, p = .005, p = .006, and p = .011, respectively). Based on E-cadherin/vimentin, 65.0% of tumors shifted to an epithelial phenotype, as compared to 66.7% based on claudin-3/vimentin, 84.6% based on E-cadherin/N-cadherin, and 71.4% based on claudin-3/N-cadherin ratios. Thus, our results showed that eribulin suppressed EMT in breast cancer tissues.     

A prospective study of hand preference and language development in 18‐ to 30‐month olds: I. hand preference

The time at which hand preference is established has long been of interest to developmentalists. In a prospective longitudinal study of 49 children (27 boys, 22 girls) an 11‐item hand preference inventory was given at 18, 24, and 30 months. At 18 months, nearly 75% of boys and girls had a clear hand preference (right or left); 73% of girls and 59% of boys were right‐handed. Evaluation of the stability of handedness showed that 60% to 70% of children maintained the same hand preference from 18 to 30 months of age. The results suggest that handedness is determined by at least 18 months and that preference for the same hand is retained 1 year later.