General vs Neuraxial Anesthesia in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Effect on Length of Stay and Early Pain Control

BackgroundRecent literature has suggested some benefits for neuraxial anesthesia (NA) as an alternative for general anesthesia (GA) for primary total hip arthroplasty patients. We examined the impact of NA vs GA on outcomes for patients undergoing direct anterior (DA) approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an institution with established rapid recovery protocols.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted for 500 consecutive THA patients from a single institution. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression were used to compare outcomes for THA patients receiving NA and GA.ResultsThere was a significant difference in length of stay with NA patients having a shorter length of stay (NA 32.7 hours vs GA 38.1 hours, P = .003). Patients receiving NA had significantly lower PACU morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (NA 10.2 MME vs GA 15.6 MME, P < .001) and reported a lower score on the PACU pain numeric rating scale (NA 2.1 vs GA 3.7, P < .001).ConclusionNeuraxial anesthesia is associated with decreased LOS, decreased PACU MME, and a lower PACU pain score for patients undergoing primary DA THA. These trends remained consistent when controlling for age, gender, BMI, and ASA.     

Procedure Duration,Time Under Anesthesia,and Readmissions in Direct Anterior and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundOperative time is related to complications in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study compared operative time in direct anterior (DA) and posterior approach THA and whether differences were related to increased hospital readmissions within 90 days of discharge.MethodsProspectively documented data on 3,152 consecutively performed THAs by 16 surgeons at a large Midwestern United States academic healthcare system were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeons were beyond their learning curve. Cases characterized by factors extending operative time were excluded. A total of 1,235 analysis cases were performed with the DA approach and 1,608 with the posterior approach. DA patients had lower mean body mass index (P < .001), were more likely to be classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1 or 2 (P < .001), and more likely to have surgery in an ambulatory setting (P < .001).ResultsTime under anesthesia was significantly longer for DA procedures by 19 to 27 minutes in hospital and ambulatory settings, respectively (P < .001). Increasing body mass index had a greater impact on anesthesia time for DA patients (P = .020). There were no differences in nontraumatic readmissions within 90 days of surgery based on surgical approach (P ≥ .480); however, significantly more DA patients classified as ASA-PS 3 or 4 were readmitted compared to those classified as ASA-PS 1 or 2 (P < .001), a difference not observed for posterior approach patients.ConclusionAnesthesia time is a modifiable risk factor for patient safety and an important factor in healthcare resource utilization. Consideration of ways to reduce DA operative times is encouraged.     

Early Outcome Comparison Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Mini-Incision Posterior Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: 150 Consecutive Cases

This study evaluated early postoperative results of 150 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon; 50 from mini-incision posterior approach, 50 during the learning curve for the direct anterior approach, and 50 subsequent cases when the approach was routine. The anterior approach groups had significantly reduced hospital length of stays (2.9 and 2.7 days versus 3.9 days for the posterior group; P < 0.0001) and discharge to home versus rehab was more likely (80% and 84% in anterior groups, 56% in posterior group; P = 0.0028). In the anterior groups, there was significantly less use of assistive devices and narcotics at 6 weeks, and pain was significantly lower. Primary total hip arthroplasty using the anterior approach allows for superior recovery in a matched cohort of patients.     

The Direct Anterior Approach is Associated With Early Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has generated increased interest recently. The purpose of this study was to compare the duration to failure and reasons for revision of primary THA performed elsewhere and subsequently revised at our institution after the direct anterior vs other nonanterior surgical approaches to the hip.

A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy

Background

Radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been linked to clinical outcomes. The direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA has been criticized by some for providing limited exposure and compromised implant position but allows for routine use of intraoperative fluoroscopy. We sought to determine whether radiographic measurements differed by THA approach using prospective cohorts.

Hospital Adverse Events and Perioperative Outcomes in Bilateral Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundPerioperative hospital adverse events represent a significant outcome that is often overlooked. Even “minor events” such as fever or tachycardia may lead to significant costs due to workup tests, interconsultations, and/or increased length of stay (LOS). The optimal timing of bilateral direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA-THA) remains unsettled. Consequently, we wanted to compare hospital LOS, discharge disposition, hospital adverse events (major and minor), and transfusion rates between simultaneous and staged bilateral DAA-THA.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on a consecutive series of 347 primary bilateral DAA-THAs (204 patients) performed by 2 surgeons in a single institution (2010-2016). The hips finally included were categorized as simultaneous (Sim-n = 61), staged 1 (Stg1-n = 143), or staged 2 (Stg2-n = 143). We also compared simultaneous with staged surgeries performed ≤1 and >1 year apart. Baseline demographics, LOS, discharge disposition, hospital adverse events, and transfusions were assessed.ResultsThe simultaneous group had significantly younger patients and a higher proportion of males when compared with the staged groups and showed significant longer LOS [2.61 (Sim) vs 2.06 (Stg1) vs 1.63 (Stg2) days, P < .001], lower proportion of home discharge [77% (Sim) vs 91.6% (Stg1) vs 96.5% (Stg2), P < .001], as well as higher (overall) rate of adverse events [31.1% (Sim) vs 28.7% (Stg1) vs 14.0% (Stg2), P = .003] and transfusions [45.9% (Sim) vs 6.3% (Stg1) vs 7.0% (Stg2), P < .001]. However, most transfusions were autologous [37.7% (Sim) vs 3.5% (Stg1) vs 0% (Stg2), P < .001].ConclusionOur data show that bilateral DAA-THAs performed in a staged fashion, rather than simultaneously, have a shorter hospital LOS and decreased rates of adverse events and overall transfusions. Notwithstanding, simultaneous surgery should still be considered an option in selected patients.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Iliopsoas Impingement After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology,Risk Factors,and Treatment Options

BackgroundThe objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence, natural history, response to treatment, and risk factors for anterior iliopsoas impingement (AIPI) after direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsBetween January 1, 2009 and January 4, 2014, 600 patients (655 hips) who underwent primary DAA THA were retrospectively reviewed. AIPI incidence was calculated. Natural history and response to a stepwise treatment approach was assessed. Radiographic anterior acetabular component overhang was measured. Asymptomatic controls were used to identify risk factors for the development of AIPI.ResultsIn total, 518 patients (559 hips) met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AIPI was 32/559 (5.7%). Symptom resolution occurred in 22/32 (68.8%) patients at final follow-up. Nonoperative management was successful in 15/32 (46.9%) patients. Operative intervention resulted in symptom resolution in 5/8 (62.5%) patients. On univariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.79), acetabular component to native femoral head diameter ratio above 1.1 (OR 3.85), and any measurable overhang (OR 7.07) significantly raised the risk of AIPI, while increasing native femoral head diameter was protective for AIPI (OR 0.83).ConclusionAIPI is a cause of groin pain after DAA THA, which often improves with conservative measures. Significant predisposing factors for AIPI include female gender, small native femoral head diameter, increased acetabular component to femoral head diameter ratio, and most notably, any measurable acetabular component overhang.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.     

The Effect of Neuraxial Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty With Rapid Recovery Protocols

BackgroundCompared to general anesthesia (GA), neuraxial anesthesia (NA) has been associated with improved outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We examined the impact of NA on patient outcomes in an institution with an established rapid recovery protocol.MethodsThis is a single-institution retrospective analysis of 5914 consecutive primary TJA performed from July 2015 to June 2018. Univariate tests and multivariate regression compared length of stay (LOS), transfusion rates, hematocrit levels, discharge disposition, and emergency room returns between patients receiving GA and NA.ResultsPatients receiving NA had a significantly shorter LOS (total hip arthroplasty [THA]: GA 1.74 vs NA 1.36 days, P < .001; total knee arthroplasty [TKA]: GA 1.77 vs NA 1.64 days, P < .001). Both THA and TKA patients receiving NA were less likely to require transfusion (THA: GA 5.8% vs NA 1.6%, P < .001; TKA: GA 2.5% vs NA 0.5%, P < .001) and had a higher postoperative hematocrit (THA: GA 32.50% vs NA 33.22%, P < .001; TKA GA 33.57 vs NA 34.50%, P < .001). Patients receiving NA were more likely to discharge home (THA: GA 83.4% vs NA 92.3%, P < .001; TKA: GA 83.3% vs NA 86.3%, P = .010) (THA: NA adjusted OR [aOR] 2.04, P < .001; TKA: NA aOR 1.23, P = .048) and had significantly lower rates of 90-day emergency room visits (THA: NA aOR 0.61, P = .005; TKA: NA aOR 0.74, P = .034).ConclusionNA appears to contribute to decreased LOS, short-term complications, and transfusions while facilitating home discharge following TKA and THA. These trends are consistent when controlling for patient-specific risk factors, suggesting NA may enhance outcomes for patients with increased age, body mass index, and comorbidities.Level Of EvidenceLevel III Retrospective Cohort Study.     

Cementless Tapered-Wedge Stem Length Affects the Risk of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Although the popularity of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has increased, the femoral procedure in this approach is considered technically challenging, and one of the most frequent complications reported was periprosthetic femoral fractures. The present study aimed to identify factors for predicting the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures after using stems with a cementless tapered-wedge design through the direct anterior approach.

Complication Rates and the Benefits of Neuraxial Anesthesia in the Patient With High Comorbidity Burden Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 4 (ASA PS 4) comprises patients with “severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life.” The purpose of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis to report the rate of complications in the ASA PS 4 patients who undergo elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In addition, we report whether neuraxial anesthesia is associated with improved outcomes compared to general anesthesia in these patients.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to extract patient records. The study population included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TJA from 2014 to 2016 and who were classified as ASA PS 4. To measure differences in outcomes and patient characteristics, we used chi-squared tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported for all covariates. A P value of <.01 was selected.ResultsAmong the patients who were ASA PS 4, 58 (1.4%) experienced 30-day mortality, 349 (8.2%) experienced 30-day readmission, 271 (6.3%) had a postoperative complication, and 504 (11.8%) required a transfusion. Those receiving neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia had lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.49; P = .0001) and lower odds of perioperative transfusion (OR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.45-0.65; P < .0001).ConclusionThe elevated risks for ASA PS 4 patients undergoing TJA may be too high to justify surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is a reasonable alternative to general anesthesia if pursuing TJA in patients with a very high comorbidity burden.     

Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Decubitus Position: Our Experiences and Early Results

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is typically performed in the supine position using a specially designed operating room table, which makes this approach more accessible to orthopedic surgeons. We attempted to perform this procedure in the lateral decubitus position on an ordinary operation table to avoid dependence on a special operating room table. There is an obvious absence of literature regarding this subject.

The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome

Background

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are a significant cause of mortality and disability among the elderly population. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the preferred treating method in active, cognitively intact patients. The direct anterior approach (DAA) has suggested a lower dislocation risk and a significant reduction in postoperative pain and recovery time in elective THA. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and mortality of THA through the DAA between FNF and elective cases.

Muscle Damage After Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the direct anterior approach (DAA) is known to cause less muscle damage than other surgical approaches. However, more complex primary cases, such as developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), might often cause muscle damage. The objective of the present study was to clarify the muscle damage observed 1 year after THA through the DAA for DDH using magnetic resonance imaging.

Similar Improvement in Gait Parameters Following Direct Anterior & Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

We compared gait parameters prior to, at 6 months and 1 year following total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed via direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) by a single surgeon in 22 patients. A gait analysis system involving reflective markers, infrared cameras and a multicomponent force plate was utilized. Postoperatively, the study cohort demonstrated improvement in flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) (P = 0.001), peak flexion (P = 0.005) and extension (P = 0.002) moments with no differences between groups. Internal/external ROM improved significantly in the DAA group (P = 0.04) with no change in the PA group. THA performed via DAA and PA offers similar improvement in gait parameters with the exception of internal/external ROM which might be related to the release and repair of external rotators during PA THA.     

In-Hospital Morbidity and Postoperative Revisions After Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) offers the potential for less soft tissue insult, improved early recovery, and reduced dislocation rates. However, complications are associated with the DAA, particularly during the learning curve. We compare the DAA learning curve experience with the posterior approach regarding in-hospital complications and revision rate.

Length of Stay,Discharge Disposition,and 90-Day Complications and Revisions Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Direct Anterior,Posterolateral, and Direct Superior Approaches

BackgroundThe direct anterior (DA) approach is becoming increasingly popular for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study is to evaluate early postoperative complication and revision rates based on surgical approach, comparing DA, posterolateral (PL), and direct superior (DS) approaches.MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, a total joint arthroplasty database from a single institution was used to identify all patients who underwent elective primary THA between July 2013 and November 2017 with a DA, PL, or DS hip approach. Patients were followed for complications out to 90 days postsurgery. Patients were divided into groups based on surgical approach and compared on length of stay, discharge disposition, and 90-day complication and revision rates.ResultsThere were 5341 THA procedures performed, with 3162 PL, 1846 DA, and 333 DS approaches. Length of stay was shorter for DS (1.7 ± 0.9 days) and DA (1.8 ± 0.9 days) than for PL approaches (2.3 ± 1.4 days, P < .001) The DS approach had the highest rate of home discharges (93.1%), but the highest short-term revision rate (1.5%, P = .011). The DA approach had the lowest intraoperative fracture rate (0.1%, P = .019) but the highest incidence of postoperative fractures (1.3%, P = .021). There were no differences in readmission (P = .056), 90-day events (P = .062), emergency department visits (P = .210), dislocations (P = .090), combined perioperative fractures (P = .289), venous thromboembolic events (P = .059), or acute infection rates (P = .287).ConclusionIn the era of bundled payments, the DA, PL, and DS approaches can all be effectively used.Level of EvidenceLevel III; retrospective comparative study.     

Predictors of Perioperative Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is an association between intraoperative and postoperative femoral fractures and the direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study is to identify risk factors for Vancouver B fractures and to establish a predictable timeline for when these occur.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures (n = 49) after 11,509 elective primary cementless THA procedures through the DAA between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution. Fracture patients were matched to nonfracture patients (n = 267) by date of surgery and surgeon. Clinical and radiographic factors were collected for multivariable analysis to identify predictors of fracture.ResultsPeriprosthetic Vancouver B femoral fracture incidence was 0.4%. 48 (98%) fractures were postoperative. Fractures occurred at an average of 44 days after surgery (range: 1 to 653 days) with >85% of fractures occurring in the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Significant variables predictive of fracture included >3 degrees valgus and >5 degrees varus coronal stem malalignment, Dorr B and C femoral geometry, lower canal flare index (2.75 vs 3.20), advanced age, increased comorbidities, greater stem canal fill, and right-sided procedures.ConclusionDespite an overall low rate of Vancouver B perioperative periprosthetic femoral fractures, it is a devastating complication that typically presents within the first 6 weeks after DAA THA surgery. The risk is increased in patients with unfavorable proximal femoral geometry, coronal stem malalignment, advanced age, increased comorbidities, and right-sided procedures.     

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Morphometrically Optimized Femoral Stem,a Conventional Operating Table,Without Fluoroscopy

Background

Our experience with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) suggests that it can be performed successfully with a morphometrically optimized metaphyseal-diaphyseal engaging femoral stem (NOT a short stem), a regular operating room table (NOT a special custom table), and WITHOUT intraoperative fluoroscopy. We report our minimum 2-year results.

Heterotopic Ossification Following Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty With and Without Postoperative Analgesic Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatories

BackgroundHeterotopic ossification (HO) can result in poorer clinical outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Multiple modes of intervention have been evaluated for HO prevention, including the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories. Additionally, multimodal pain management strategies including celecoxib have become more prominent. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the influence of celecoxib as part of postoperative analgesia on the risk of developing HO following the direct anterior approach (DA) for THA.MethodsA retrospective query identified primary DA THAs performed by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to those who received 3 weeks celecoxib upon discharge, and those who did not. Radiographs were used to categorize patients according to the Brooker classification system for HO. Preoperative and 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative X-rays were evaluated.ResultsA total of 688 DA THAs were included, demonstrating a 9.6% (n = 66) incidence of HO with Brooker classification: 1: 5.7% (n = 39); 2: 2.6% (n = 18); 3: 1.2% (n = 8); and 4: 0.1% (n = 1). Patients who did not receive celecoxib had a 14.3% (52/364) rate of HO following THA (odds ratio 4.53, P < .001) vs only 4.3% (14/324) in the celecoxib group (odds ratio 0.22, P < .001). Overall, 9 patients (1.3%) went on to develop significant HO (Booker 3 or greater): 8 (2.2%) in the control group and 1 (0.3%) in the celecoxib group (P < .001).ConclusionOur findings suggest a significant reduction in the formation of HO following DA THA when using postoperative analgesic celecoxib as part of a multimodal pain protocol. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to identify ideal dosage, duration, and formulation to reduce the risk of HO while optimizing multimodal pain management.