Differences in Pain,Opioid Use,and Function Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundWe sought to determine if immediate postsurgical pain, opioid use, and clinical function differed between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA single-institution database was utilized to identify patients who underwent elective total joint arthroplasty between 2016 and 2019.ResultsIn total, 6616 patients were identified: 98.20% TKA (6497) and 1.80% (119) UKA. UKA patients were younger, had lower body mass index, and more often male than the TKA cohort. Aggregate opioid consumption (75.94 morphine milligram equivalents vs 136.5 morphine milligram equivalents; P < .001) along with the first 24-hour and 48-hour usage was significantly less for UKA as compared to TKA. Similarly, pain scores (1.98 vs 2.58; P < .001) were lower for UKA while Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care mobilization scores were higher (21.02 vs 18.76; P < .001). UKA patients were able to be discharged home on the day of surgery 37% of the time as compared to 2.45% of TKA patients (P < .0001). Notably, when comparing UKA and TKA patients who were discharged home on the day of surgery, no differences regarding pain scores, opioid utilization, or mobilization were observed.ConclusionUKA patients are younger, have lower body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and more often male than TKA patients. UKA patients had significantly shorter length of stay than TKA patients and were discharged home more often than TKA patients, on both the day of surgery and following hospital admission. Most notably, UKA patients reported lower pain scores and were found to require 45% lower opioid medication in the immediate postsurgical period than TKA patients. Surprisingly, UKA and TKA patients discharged on the day of surgery did not differ in terms of pain scores, opioid utilization, or mobilization, suggesting that our rapid rehabilitation UKA protocols can be successfully translated to outpatient TKAs with similar outcomes.Level III EvidenceRetrospective Cohort Study.     

Prior Knee Arthroscopy Increases the Failure Rate of Subsequent Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIn selected patients, knee arthroscopy is performed prior to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to treat symptomatic mechanical pathology, delay arthroplasty, and assess the knee compartments. The purpose of this study was to determine if knee arthroscopy prior to UKA is associated with increased rates of UKA failure or conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsData was collected from the Humana insurance database from 2007-2017. Patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within two years prior to UKA were identified and matched with controls based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, and obesity. Rates of conversion to TKA and failure for various causes were compared between cohorts.ResultsPrior to propensity matching, 8353 UKA patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 1079 patients (12.9%) underwent knee arthroscopy within two years of UKA and were matched to 1079 patients (controls) who did not undergo knee arthroscopy in the two years preceding UKA. No differences in demographics/comorbidities existed among cohorts. Compared to controls, the knee arthroscopy cohort was more likely to experience failure for aseptic loosening (2.4% vs 1.1%; OR 2.166; P = .044) and significantly more likely to require conversion to TKA (10.4% vs 4.9%; OR 2.113; P < .001) within two years of UKA.ConclusionKnee arthroscopy within two years of UKA is associated with an increased rate of UKA conversion to TKA and a higher rate of UKA failure from aseptic loosening. Although clinicians should be mindful of this association when performing knee arthroscopy in patients who may be indicated for future UKA, further research is needed to better characterize these findings.     

Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 55 Years of Age at 4-19 Years of Follow-Up: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report

BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in isolated unicompartmental disease; however, mid-term to long-term results in young patients are unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the mid-term outcomes of fixed-bearing medial UKA in patients less than 55 years of age.MethodsSeventy-seven fixed-bearing medial UKAs in patients less than 55 years of age (mean 49.9, range 38-55) from a previously published report were retrospectively reviewed at a mean follow-up of 11.2 years (range 4.1-19.2).ResultsEleven knees were converted to TKA (14.3%) at 0.7-13.8 years postoperatively. The indications for revision included 7 for unexplained pain (9.1%), 2 for grade 4 arthritic progression (1 isolated lateral and 1 lateral and patellofemoral compartments; 2.6%), 1 for polyethylene wear (1.3%), and 1 for femoral component loosening (1.3%). Predicted survivorship free from component revision was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 86.9-93.9) at 10 years and 75.1% (95% confidence interval 66.2-84.0) at 19 years. The mean Knee Society Score improved from a mean of 51.9-88.6 points (P < .001). Of the 52 knees with 4-year minimum radiographs, 3 (5.8%) developed isolated grade 4 patellofemoral arthritis that was asymptomatic, and no knees had evidence of component loosening or osteolysis.ConclusionFixed-bearing medial UKA is a durable option for young patients with unicompartmental arthritis, with good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Unexplained pain was the most common reason for revision to TKA.     

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Patients Have Lower Joint Awareness and Higher Function at 5 Years Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Matched Comparison

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up in patients following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to a matched cohort of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.MethodsPatients who had primarily medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) who met criteria for medial UKA underwent TKA or medial UKA between 2014 and 2015 at a single institution, matched for age, sex, and body mass index. There were 127 UKAs in 120 patients and 118 TKAs in 116 patients included with minimum 5-year follow-up (range, 6 to 8). Mean age was 69 years (range, 59 to 79) and 71 years (range, 62 to 80) in the UKA and TKA groups, respectively (P = .049).ResultsPatients who underwent UKA had significantly higher mean (±SD) Forgotten Joint Scores (87 ± 20 versus 59 ± 34, P < .001); higher Knee Society Scores (88 ± 14 versus 75 ± 21, P < .001); and lower Numeric Pain Rating Scores (0.8 ± 1.6 versus 1.9 ± 2.2, P < .001). Survivorship free from all-cause revision was 96% (95% CI = 93%-99%) and 99% (95% CI = 97%-100%) at 5 years for TKA and UKA, respectively (P = .52). There were 8 both component revisions in the TKA group within 5 years from the date of surgery and 2 UKA conversions to TKA after 5-year follow-up.ConclusionPatients who have medial compartment OA and underwent UKA had significantly lower joint awareness, decreased pain, improved function, and higher satisfaction compared to matched TKA patients at minimum 5-year follow-up while maintaining excellent survivorship.     

Narcotic Consumption in Opioid Naïve Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with increased risk of prolonged narcotic requirement compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of the current study is to compare acute postoperative narcotic consumption between the 2 procedures and quantify narcotic consumption.MethodsFrom October 2017 to August 2019 patients were surveyed for four weeks to determine the amount and duration of opioids consumed and requirement for continued narcotics. Among 976 opioid naïve patients, 314 (32%) underwent UKA and 662 (68%) underwent TKA. Patients were analyzed according to specific narcotic prescribed. Total morphine equivalent dose (MED), number of pills, duration, refill percentage, and usage percentage for 4 weeks were calculated for each procedure.ResultsMED used in the postoperative period was lower in patients undergoing UKA than TKA (200 ± 195 vs 259 ± 250 MED, P = .002). Total number of pills consumed and duration of use was less in UKA compared to TKA regardless of which opioid was prescribed. A smaller proportion of patients required narcotics for 4 weeks after UKA (32% vs 43%, P < .001), and fewer UKA patients required narcotic refills (14% vs 27%, P < .001). Sixty pills of any 1 type of narcotic was sufficient for 90% of UKA patients and over 75% of TKA patients.ConclusionUKA is associated with less narcotic consumption, shorter duration of use, less refills, and lower likelihood of narcotic requirement for 4 weeks. We report narcotic consumption patterns for both procedures to aid surgeons in judicious postoperative prescribing.Level of EvidenceThis is a level III retrospective cohort study reviewing narcotic use in over 900 consecutive opioid naïve patients undergoing UKA or TKA.     

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up After Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the long-term functional outcome and quality of life between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2008, a total of 218 patients underwent primary UKA at our tertiary hospital. A TKA group was matched through 1:1 propensity score matching and adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative knee flexion, and function scores. All patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis. The patients were assessed with the range of motion, Knee Society Knee Score and Knee Society Function Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short Form-36 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score preoperatively, at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years. Patients’ satisfaction, expectation fulfillment, and minimal clinically important difference were analyzed.ResultsThere were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups after propensity score matching (P > .05). UKA had greater knee flexion at all time points. Although the Knee Society Function Score was superior in UKA by 5.5, 3, and 4.3 points at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years, respectively (P < .001), these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Society Knee Score 6.1). There were no significant differences in the Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36 physical component score/mental component score. At 10 years, similar proportions of UKA and TKA were satisfied (90.8% vs 89.9%, P = .44) and had expectation fulfillment (89.4% vs 88.5%, P = .46). Between 2 and 10 years, all function scores deteriorated significantly for both groups (P < .01).ConclusionUKA and TKA are excellent treatment modalities for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, with similar functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction at 10 years.     

Racial Disparities in Rates of Revision and use of Modern Features in Total Knee Arthroplasty,a National Registry Study

BackgroundThe purpose of our study was to investigate the association of race and ethnicity with rates of modern implant use and postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons American Joint Replacement Registry.MethodsAdult TKAs from 2012 to 2020 were queried from the American Joint Replacement Registry. A total of 1,121,457 patients were available for analysis for surgical features and 1,068,210 patients for analysis of outcomes. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of race with each individual surgical feature (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA)) and 30- and 90-day readmission. A proportional subdistribution hazard model was used to model the risk of revision TKA.ResultsOn multivariate analyses, compared to White patients, Black (odds ratio (OR): 0.52 P < .0001), Hispanic (OR 0.75 P < .001), and Native American (OR: 0.69 P = .0011) patients had lower rates of UKA, while only Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA (OR = 0.76 P < .001). White (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.8, P < .001), Asian (HR = 0.51, P < .001), and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.73, P = .001) patients had a lower risk of revision TKA than Black patients. Asian patients had a lower revision risk than White (HR = 0.64, P < .001) and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.69, P = .011) patients. No significant differences existed between groups for 30- or 90-day readmissions.ConclusionBlack, Hispanic, and Native American patients had lower rates of UKA compared to White patients, while Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA compared to White, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Black patients also had higher rates of revision TKA than other races.     

Does Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Offer Improved Clinical Advantages Over Total Knee Replacement in the Treatment of Isolated Lateral Osteoarthritis? A Matched Cohort Analysis From an Independent Center

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the functional and radiographic results, perioperative complications, satisfaction rate, and mid-term survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of lateral compartmental knee osteoarthritis (LCKO).MethodsBetween March 2007 and September 2017, we identified 35 patients with primary TKAs and 121 patients with lateral UKAs (LUKAs) for LCKO with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean 5.3 years, range 2-12.4). The matched variables were age, gender, operation side, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, initial diagnosis, osteoarthritis grade in lateral compartment, and follow-up time. All patients were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, length of hospital stay, satisfaction, and complications. Survivorship of UKA and TKA implants was also compared.ResultsAt last follow-up, LUKA had a significantly better postoperative Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, shorter length of hospital time, and higher satisfaction rate than matched TKA group. There were significant differences regarding patellar tendon injury (P = .043), superficial wound infection (P = .028), patellar snapping or impingement (P = .047), and stiffness (P < .001). Five-year survivorships free from revision were similar in both groups (99.2% vs 97.1%, P = .347).ConclusionLUKA for LCKO demonstrated more favorable 5-year results in comparison with TKA. Furthermore, LUKA achieved comparable mid-term survivorship and was less likely to suffer from wound infection and knee stiffness, although not overall surgical complications.     

Revision Joint Arthroplasty and Renal Transplant: A Matched Control Cohort Study

BackgroundThere is little literature concerning clinical outcomes following revision joint arthroplasty in solid organ transplant recipients. The aims of this study are to (1) analyze postoperative outcomes and mortality following revision hip and knee arthroplasty in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) compared to non-RTRs and (2) characterize common indications and types of revision procedures among RTRs.MethodsA retrospective Medicare database review identified 1020 RTRs who underwent revision joint arthroplasty (359 revision total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 661 revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]) from 2005 to 2014. RTRs were compared to their respective matched control groups of nontransplant revision arthroplasty patients for hospital length of stay, readmission, major medical complications, infections, septicemia, and mortality following revision.ResultsRenal transplantation was significantly associated with increased length of stay (6.12 ± 7.86 vs 4.33 ± 4.29, P < .001), septicemia (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-3.46; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.51-4.53; P < .001) following revision TKA. Among revision THA patients, RTR status was associated with increased hospital readmission (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47; P = .023), septicemia (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.41-2.34; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.88-3.66; P < .001). The most frequent primary diagnoses associated with revision TKA and THA among RTRs were mechanical complications of prosthetic implant.ConclusionPrior renal transplantation among revision joint arthroplasty patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared to nontransplant recipients.     

Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPatients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P < .001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P < .001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P < .001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P < .001 for Humana).ConclusionEarly aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.     

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisions in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patient Populations

BackgroundThe obese population is at higher risk for complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but little data is available regarding revision outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the role of body mass index (BMI) in the cause for revision TKA and whether BMI classification is predictive of outcomes.MethodsA multi-institutional database was generated, including revision TKAs from 2012 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, surgery types (primary revision, repeat revision), reasons for revision, lengths of hospital stay, and surgical times. Patients were compared using 3 BMI categories: nonobese (18.5 to 29.9), obese (30 to 39.9), and morbidly obese (≥40). Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-square and 1-way analysis of variance tests, respectively. Regression analyses were used to compare reasons for revision among weight classes.ResultsObese and morbidly obese patients showed significant risk for repeat revision surgery in comparison to normal weight patients. Obese patients were at higher risk for primary revision due to stiffness/fibrosis and repeat revision due to malposition. In comparison to the obese population, morbidly obese patients were more likely to require primary revision for dislocation and implant loosening.ConclusionSignificant differences in primary and repeat revision etiologies exist among weight classes. Furthermore, obese and morbidly obese patients have a greater risk of requiring repeat revision surgery. These patients should be informed of their risk for multiple operations, and surgeons should be aware of the differences in revision etiologies when anticipating complications following primary TKA.     

Disease Progression After Unicompartmental Arthroplasty: Add a Compartment or Revise to Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundFive percent to 7% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) require revision for disease progression in untreated compartment(s), most commonly to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA requires removal of bone and usually the anterior cruciate ligament. Preserving the UKA and converting to a bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA) by performing a second UKA is an alternative.MethodsThe results of 73 UKA-BCA patients were compared to 75 patients treated by UKA-TKA revision. Knee Society, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores were collected by a blinded therapist. Patients were asked about their implant preference and recovery. Twenty-two UKA-BCA revision patients had a UKA (6) or TKA (16) in the contralateral knee; thus, a direct comparison of UKA-BCA to both UKA and TKA was possible.ResultsOf the UKA-BCA patients, 69 (94%) had excellent or good, 2 (3%) fair, and 2 (3%) poor outcomes with 1 patient requiring revision to TKA. Of patients with a TKA in the contralateral knee, 13 (81%) preferred the UKA-BCA replacement and 3 (19%) preferred the TKA. All patients said the UKA-BCA revision recovery was similar or easier than their initial UKA. Of UKA-TKA revisions, 59 (79%) had excellent or good, 9 (12%) fair, and 7 (9%) poor outcomes. There was 1 wound infection and 1 re-revision in the UKA-BCA group and 1 wound infection and 3 re-revisions in the UKA-TKA group. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and Knee Society Scores were better for UKA-BCA compared to UKA-TKA.ConclusionUKA-BCA is a successful treatment for disease progression following UKA.     

Significant Reduction in Short-Term Complications Following Unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a gold standard surgical treatment for end-stage arthritis and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative for localized disease in appropriate patients. Both have been shown to have equivalent complications in the short-term period. We aimed to explore the differences in 30-day complication rates between UKA and TKA using recent data.MethodsCurrent Procedural Terminology codes identified patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent primary TKA or UKA from 2014 to 2018. Propensity score matching addressed demographic differences. Rate of any adverse event (AAE) and complications were compared.ResultsWe identified 279,852 patients with 270,786 and 9,066 undergoing TKA and UKA. No significant difference was observed in baseline demographics after matching. The AAE rate differed significantly between TKA (5.07%) and UKA (2.38%) cohorts (P < .001). TKA group experienced more wound dehiscence, cerebrovascular accident, postoperative blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, and requirement for postoperative intubation. Rate of extended length of stay differed between the TKA (11.35%) and UKA (4.89%) cohorts (P < .001). Accounting for all other variables, preoperative corticosteroid use, bleeding disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increased the risk for AAE for both groups. Increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists class also increased the odds for complication proportionally with increasing age and operative time.ConclusionContrary to previous data, we found a significantly higher 30-day complication rate in TKA patients. TKA patients had a higher likelihood of having an extended length of stay. Multivariable analysis identified preoperative steroid use, bleeding disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as risk factors for developing adverse events for both groups.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

The Association of Metabolic Syndrome on Complications and Implant Survivorship in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients

BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) includes interrelated conditions such as insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This study sought to determine the association of MetS in morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40) on complications and clinical outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective review was performed to include all morbidly obese patients who underwent primary elective TKA for osteoarthritis at a single academic institution. Patients who did and did not have MetS were propensity-matched 1:1 based on baseline characteristics. A total of 391 patients who did and 935 who did not have MetS were included having a mean body mass index of 44.2 (range, 40.0 to 68.9).ResultsThe MetS patients had longer lengths of stay (LOS) (3.5 ± 2.4 versus 3.0 ± 1.5 days, P = .001) and were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities (23.8 versus 15.3%, P = .007). At 90 days postoperatively, major (P = .756) and minor (P = .652) complication rates and readmissions (P = .359) were similar. Revision rates as well as improvements in KOOS-JR, and VR-12 mental and physical component scores from preoperative to 1 year (P = .856, P = .524, and P = .727, respectively) postoperatively did not significantly differ between groups. MetS and non-MetS patients had similar 5-year freedom from all-cause revision (90.2 versus 94.2%, P = .791).ConclusionMorbidly obese patients who have MetS had longer LOS and higher discharges to skilled nursing facilities. The 90-day complications, readmissions, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes were similar, suggesting that resource allocation should be focused on perioperative protocols that can help optimize LOS and discharge dispositions in morbidly obese MetS patients undergoing TKA.Level of evidenceIII.     

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prior Fracture or Osteotomy Around the Knee Leads to Increased Resource Utilization

BackgroundPrior knee surgery before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) puts patients at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased care cost. This study compares intraoperative and postoperative variables including procedure duration, components, length of stay, readmission, complications, and reoperations among patients undergoing conversion TKA.MethodsPrimary TKA from a single-surgeon database identified 130 patients with prior knee surgery to form a “conversion” cohort. One-to-one matching identified 130 patients of similar age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender without prior knee surgery for comparison. Perioperative and 90-day postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without prior surgery, within the conversion group based on the type of prior surgery, and whether the prior surgery was bony or soft tissue.ResultsThe conversion group had longer mean operative time (96.1 vs 90.0 minutes, P = .01), higher revision component utilization (8.5% vs 0.8%, P = .005), and higher calculated blood loss (1440 vs 1249 mL, P = .004). Thirty-eight patients with prior fracture or osteotomy were compared to the remaining 92 patients in the conversion group and showed longer operative time (107.1 vs 91.3 minutes, P < .001), higher 90-day readmissions (18.4% vs 3.3%, P = .003), more complications (23.7% vs 8.7%, P = .021), and greater utilization of revision components (26.3% vs 1.1%, P < .001).ConclusionPatients undergoing conversion TKA required increased resource utilization, particularly patients with a prior osteotomy or fracture. Policymakers should consider these variables, as they did in conversion THA, in adding a code to account for increased case complexity and resource utilization.     

Bariatric Surgery Improves Outcomes After Lower Extremity Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a New York Statewide Database

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare risks for revision and short-term complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in matched cohorts of morbidly obese patients, receiving and not receiving prior bariatric surgery.

The Role of Patient Characteristics on the Choice of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Medial Osteoarthritis

Background

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are both viable treatment options for medial osteoarthritis (OA). However, it remains unclear when to choose for which arthroplasty treatment. Goals of this study were therefore to (1) compare outcomes after both treatments and (2) assess which treatment has superior outcomes in different patient subgroups.

Diagnostic and Invasive Colonoscopy Are Not Risk Factors for Revision Surgery Due to Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundColonoscopy is routinely performed for colorectal cancer screening in patients who have a preexisting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) prostheses. However, colonoscopy is theorized to provoke transient bacteremia, providing a potential nidus for periprosthetic joint infection. This study aimed to investigate the risk of aseptic and septic revision surgery in patients who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy or invasive colonoscopy within one year following UKA, TKA, or THA.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed using a national database. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology. In total, 52,891 patients underwent UKA, 1,049,218 underwent TKA, and 526,296 underwent THA. Data were analyzed with univariate analysis preceding multivariable logistic regressions to investigate outcomes of interest at 2 and 3 years from the index procedure.ResultsDiagnostic colonoscopy resulted in no increase in odds of all-cause or septic revision surgery for any prostheses. At both time points, invasive colonoscopy resulted in lower odds of all-cause revision (P < .05) for patients with UKA, decreased odds of septic revision (P < .001) for patients with TKA, and decreased odds of both all-cause and septic revision (P < .05) for patients with THA.ConclusionOur results show that diagnostic colonoscopy was not a significant risk factor for revision following UKA, TKA, or THA. Paradoxically, invasive colonoscopy was protective against revision, even with very minimal use of antibiotic prophylaxis observed. This study addresses the theory that colonoscopy procedures may threaten an existing joint prosthesis via transient bacteremia and shows no increase in revision outcomes following colonoscopy.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients: Higher Early Reoperation and Rerevision

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) rates are increasing in younger patients. Few studies have assessed outcomes of initial aseptic rTKA performed for younger patients compared with traditional-aged patients.MethodsA detailed medical record review was performed to identify patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical rTKA indications, timing from index TKA to rTKA, subsequent reoperation rates, component rerevision rates, and salvage procedures for 147 young patients (158 knees) aged 55 years and younger and for a traditional older cohort of 276 patients (300 knees) between 60 and 75 years. Univariate analysis was performed to assess differences in these primary variables, and a log-rank test was used to estimate 5-year implant survival based on either reoperation or component revision and salvage procedures.ResultsYounger TKA patients were more likely to undergo initial aseptic rTKA within 2 years of their primary TKA (52.5% vs 29.0%, P < .001) and were more likely to undergo early reoperation (17.7% vs 9.7%, P = .02) or component rerevision (11.4% vs 6.0%, P < .05) after rTKA. Infection and extensor mechanism complications were more commonly noted in younger patients. Estimated 5-year survival was also lower for both reoperation (59.4% vs 65.7%, P = .02) and component rerevision or salvage (65.8% vs 80.1%, P = .02).ConclusionEarly reoperation and component re-rTKA were performed nearly twice as often in younger rTKA than traditional-aged TKA patients. Care should be given to reduce perioperative infection and extensor mechanism failures after rTKA in younger patients.     

Migration Patterns for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with a higher complication rate and a greater cost when compared to primary TKA. Based on patient choice, referral, or patient transfers, revision TKAs are often performed in different institutions by different surgeons than the primary TKA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hospital size, teaching status, and revision indication on the migration patterns of failed primary TKA in patients 65 years of age and older.MethodsAll primary and revision TKAs reported to the American Joint Replacement Registry from January 2012 through March 2020 were included and merged with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Migration was defined as a patient having a primary TKA and revision TKA performed at separate institutions by different surgeons.ResultsIn total, 9167 linked primary and revision TKAs were included in the analysis. Overall migration rates were significantly higher from small (<100 beds; P = .019), non-teaching institutions (P = .002) driven primarily by patients diagnosed with infection. Infection patients had significantly higher migration rates from small (46.8%, P < .001), non-teaching (43.5%, P < .001) institutions, while migration rates for other causes of revision were statistically similar. Most patients migrated to medium or large institutions (84.7%) for revision TKA rather than small institutions (15.3%, P < .001) and to teaching (78.3%) rather than non-teaching institutions (21.7%, P < .001).ConclusionThere is a diagnosis-dependent referral bias that affects the migration rates of infected primary TKA from small non-teaching institutions leading to a flow of more medically complex patients to medium and large teaching institutions for infected revision TKA.