Comparison of Cruciate-Sacrificing vs Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement Using a Contemporary Total Knee System

BackgroundThe use of highly conforming polyethylene tibial inserts in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often requires posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) release/sacrifice for balancing (CS TKA). The CS TKA relies on the posterior capsule, collateral ligaments, and articular conformity without a cam or post to achieve stability. Using prospectively collected data we compared clinical outcomes of CS TKA to posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA utilizing a contemporary TKA system.MethodsSixty-nine consecutive CS TKAs were compared to 45 consecutive PS TKAs at 2-year minimum follow-up. CS knees were balanced with the PCL released. Preoperative/postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scores (KSS), stair function, and squatting ROM were analyzed.ResultsAt minimum 2-year follow up, CS and PS TKA demonstrated significant improvement in ROM (P < .001), KSS (Pain, P < .001; Function, P < .001), and KSS stair function (P < .001), with no revisions. There was no difference in preoperative to postoperative improvements for passive knee ROM (10° (0°-20°) vs 13° (5°-25°); P = .16), KSS Pain (34 (21-42) vs 38 (24-46); P = .22), KSS Function (35 (30-50) vs 35 (18-50); P = .34), and KSS stair function (10 (10-20) vs 10 (0-20); P = .37) for CS and PS TKA, respectively. CS TKA had higher squatting ROM (P = .02) at minimum 2-year follow-up compared to PS TKA.ConclusionBoth PS and CS TKA provided significant improvement in clinical outcomes, with no differences in passive ROM, KSS, or stair function postoperatively. Our data support that with proper articular conformity and balancing, cruciate-retaining TKA in a PCL-deficient knee (CS TKA) is appropriate. This may be design specific and further prospective randomized studies are needed to corroborate these findings.     

A Retrospective Comparison of a Medial Pivot and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty With Respect to Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes

Background

Medial pivot (MP) type total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants are designed with a highly congruent medial tibiofemoral articulation. Compared with the cam-and-post design of the posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA, the MP-TKA design has been hypothesized to better replicate the natural kinematics of the knee. We compared the MP-TKA and PS-TKA designs, with our primary outcome measures being range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported satisfaction.

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medial Stabilized Versus Non–Medial Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with non–medial stabilized TKAs.MethodsA systematic search of multiple databases was conducted in October 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted for the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KFS), range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).ResultsA total of 857 articles yielded 21 studies eligible for inclusion with 13 studies used for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the medial stabilized group had a mean FJS that was 13.8 points higher than that of the non–medial stabilized TKA (mean difference [MD]: 13.83, P ≤ .0001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.90-18.76, I² = 0%) which was less than the minimal clinically important difference of 14. The medial stabilized group also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the postoperative ROM (MD = 2.52, P = .05, 95% CI: ?0.03 to 5.07, I² = 85%) and OKS when compared with the non–medial stabilized group (MD = 1.25, P = .02, 95% CI: 0.17-2.33, I² = 27%), but these were not clinically significant. There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in the KSS, KFS, and WOMAC scores.ConclusionMedial stabilized knee prostheses demonstrated no clinically significant differences for the ROM, OKS, WOMAC, KSS, and KFS. The FJS demonstrated the greatest MD and warrants further investigation. Future research is required using patient-reported outcome measures with a lower ceiling effect such as the FJS.     

Mild Valgus Alignment After Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Led to Lower Functional Results and Survivorship at Mean 8-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundIn medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the best results and the highest survivorship are found by mild undercorrection of varus deformities. In lateral UKA, the desirable amount of valgus undercorrection has not yet been determined. The purposes of this study were to present the results of a consecutive series of lateral UKAs and to investigate the effect of postoperative limb alignment on them.MethodsA total of 161 lateral UKA were reviewed. Outcomes studied included range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, Tegner Activity Scale, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and survivorship. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative alignment: group A (hip-knee-ankle ≥184°, 79 UKA) and group B (hip-knee-ankle <184°, 82 UKA).ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-18), ROM (P < .01); KSS-C (P < .01); KSS-F (P < .01); VAS (P < .01) improved from baseline. No differences were noted in postoperative ROM, VAS, University of California Los Angeles, Tegner Activity Scale, and Forgotten Joint Score between groups. Group A showed higher postoperative clinical and functional KSS (P < .01) and higher survivorship (96.2 versus 91.5%, P = .01) than group B.ConclusionMild valgus alignment (3° or less) after lateral UKA is linked to lower clinical and functional scores and lower survivorship compared to moderate valgus (over 4°) at mean 8-year follow-up. More undercorrection of the coronal deformity in lateral UKA compared to medial UKA is desirable to get the best results.     

Comparison of Anterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study

BackgroundA highly conforming, anterior-stabilized (AS) insert is designed to provide anteroposterior (AP) stability of the posterior-stabilized (PS) insert without a post. The purpose of this study was to compare the static and dynamic stability and function of AS and PS total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the same patients.MethodsA prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed in 45 patients scheduled to undergo same-day bilateral TKA. One knee was randomly assigned to receive an AS TKA, and the other knee was scheduled for a PS TKA from the same knee system. At 2 years postoperatively, the static AP stability was compared using anterior and posterior drawer stress radiographs at 90° knee flexion. Dynamic AP stability was evaluated using one-leg standing lateral fluoroscopic images throughout the range of motion. Knee function was compared using the Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score.ResultsAt 2 years postoperatively, there was a significant difference in knee AP laxity at 90° of flexion between the two groups (7.6 ± 3.9 mm in the AS group vs 2.2 ± 2.3 in the PS group, P < .001). However, there were no differences in dynamic AP stability under one-leg standing fluoroscopic lateral images at 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion (P = .732, P = .764, and P = .679, respectively). The Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P = .641 and P = .582, respectively).ConclusionDespite the fact that the AS TKA group showed significantly more static posterior displacement than the PS TKA group at 90° of knee flexion, both the AS and PS TKA groups showed similar dynamic stability under weight-bearing conditions and knee function at 2 years postoperatively.     

The Effect of Polyethylene Liner Thickness on Patient Outcomes and Failure After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe effect of using thicker liners in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on functional outcomes and aseptic failure rates remains largely unknown. As such, we devised a multicenter study to assess both the clinical outcomes and survivorship of thick vs thin liners after primary TKA.MethodsA search of our institutional databases was performed for patients having undergone bilateral (simultaneous or staged) primary TKA with similar preoperative and surgical characteristics between both sides. Two cohorts were created: thick liners and thin liners. Outcomes collected were as follows: change in Knee Society Score (ΔKSS), change in range of motion, and aseptic revision. Ad hoc power analysis was performed for ΔKSS (⍺ = 0.05; power = 80%). Differences between cohorts were assessed.ResultsAbout 195 TKAs were identified for each cohort. ΔKSS and change in range of motion in the thin vs thick cohorts were similar: 51.4 vs 51.6 (P = .86) and 11.1° vs 10.0° (P = .66), respectively. No difference in aseptic revision rates were observed between thin and thick cohorts: all cause (4.1%, 3.1%; P = .59), aseptic loosening (0.5%, 0.5%; P = 1.0), instability (0.5%, 0.5%; P = 1.0), all-cause revision for stiffness (3.1%, 2.1%; P = .52), manipulation under anesthesia (2.1%, 2.1%; P = 1.0), and liner exchange (0.5%, 0%; P = .32).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that both rates of revision surgery and clinical outcomes are similar for TKAs performed with thick and thin liners. Preoperative factors are likely to play an important role in liner thickness selection, and emphasis should be placed on ensuring sound surgical technique.     

Improved Range of Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Scores With Fixed-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Suboptimal Axial Implant Rotation

BackgroundSuboptimal implant rotation has consequences with respect to knee kinematics and clinical outcomes. We evaluated the functional outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for poor axial implant rotation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 42 TKAs undergoing aseptic revision for poor axial implant rotation. We assessed improvements in Knee Society Score (KSS) and final range of motion (ROM). Subgroup analyses were performed for preoperative instability and stiffness, as well as the number of components revised and level of implant constraint used.ResultsRevision for poor axial rotation in isolation improved KSS from 52 ± 22 to 84 ± 25 (P < .001), and flexion increased from 105 ± 21° to 115 ± 13° (P = .001). Revision in the setting of instability significantly improved the KSS (P < .001) but did not affect ROM (P = .172). Revision in the setting of stiffness significantly improved both KSS (P < .001) and ROM (P = .002). There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative KSS (P = .889) and final knee flexion (P = .629) with single- or both-component revision TKA for isolated poor axial rotation or between the postoperative KSS (P = .956) and final knee flexion (P = .541) with or without the use of higher constraint during revision TKA for isolated poor axial rotation.ConclusionRevision TKA for poor axial alignment improves clinical outcomes scores and functional ROM.     

Do Patients With Diabetes Have Poorer Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundDiabetes is one of the most common comorbidities in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis. However, the evidence remains unclear on how it affects patient-reported outcome measures after TKA.MethodsWe reviewed prospectively collected data of 2840 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA between 2008 and 2018, of which 716 (25.2%) had diabetes. All patients had their HbA1c measured within 1 month before surgery, and only well-controlled diabetics (HbA1c <8.0%) were allowed to proceed with surgery. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded, and multiple regression was performed to evaluate the impact of diabetes on improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (Short Form 36 (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS)) and knee range of motion (ROM).ResultsCompared with nondiabetics, patients with diabetes were more likely to possess a higher body mass index (P-value <.001), more comorbidities (P-value <.001), and poorer preoperative SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) (P-value <.001), WOMAC (P-value = .002), KSS-function (P-value <.001), and knee ROM (P-value <.001). Multiple regression showed that diabetic patients experienced marginally poorer improvements in KSS-knee (?1.22 points, P-value = .025) and knee ROM (?1.67°, P-value = .013) than nondiabetics. However, there were no significant differences in improvements for SF-36 PCS (P-value = .163), Mental Component Summary (P-value = .954), WOMAC (P-value = .815), and KSS-function (P-value = .866).ConclusionPatients with well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c <8.0%) can expect similar improvements in general health and osteoarthritis outcomes (SF-36 PCS and Mental Component Summary, WOMAC, and KSS-function) compared with nondiabetics after TKA. Despite having marginally poorer improvements in knee-specific outcomes (KSS-knee and knee ROM), these differences are unlikely to be clinically significant.     

Postoperative Anteroposterior Laxity Influences Subjective Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

We hypothesized that postoperative anteroposterior (AP) stability of the knee correlates with patient-reported clinical outcome and knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures

BackgroundIt is unclear whether coronal stability differs between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare coronal laxity, radiological, and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA.MethodsSeventy five CR-TKAs and 72 PS-TKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Coronal laxity was assessed at knee extension and 80° of flexion on varus and valgus stress radiographs. Radiological evaluation included femoral-tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, and positions of femoral and tibial components. Clinical evaluation included the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and range of motion.ResultsPS-TKA resulted in significantly larger varus, valgus, and total laxities at 80° flexion (P = .034, .031, and 0.001, respectively) compared with CR-TKA, while no significant difference was found at extension (P = .513, .964, and .658, respectively). No statistical difference was found in radiological and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA, but the functional scores were slightly better in CR-TKA. There were adverse correlations between varus laxity at flexion and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, and range of motion (r = 0.933, −0.229, −0.472, respectively).ConclusionCoronal laxity at 80° of flexion was larger after PS-TKA than CR-TKA. In addition, clinical outcomes were adversely affected by the larger varus laxity at flexion. Care should be taken to maintain the coronal stability, especially at flexion, during surgery to obtain better patient-reported outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel III.     

Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Failed Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

BackgroundControversy exists whether or not a previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) influences the outcome and survival of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of UKA after failed open-wedge HTO compared with UKA with no previous HTO.MethodsBetween 2001 and 2017, 24 post-HTO UKAs (group A) with an average follow-up of 8.1 years (range: 5 to 13) were compared with a control group of 30 patients undergoing simple UKA (group B) with an average follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 2 to 16). All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using Knee Society Score, University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, and through objective evaluation. Mechanical coronal alignment and Caton-Deschamps index were measured both preoperatively and postoperatively.ResultsIn both groups, Knee Society Score, University of California at Los Angeles Activity Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scores significantly improved at follow-up (P < .001). In addition, statistically significant greater improvements in clinical and functional scores were reported in group B compared with group A (P < .001). No statistically significant differences concerning postoperative mechanical axis were observed between groups (2.7° and 3.2°, respectively, P = .27) and with regard to Caton-Deschamps index (1.0° and 1.1°, respectively, P = .44).ConclusionThis study demonstrated improvements in clinical and functional outcomes compared with preoperatory status in both groups irrespective of a previous HTO. A prior HTO was a determinant for having reduced postoperative clinical and functional outcomes after UKA.     

Staged BiCompartmental Knee Arthroplasty has Greater Functional Improvement,but Equivalent Midterm Survivorship,as Revision TKA for Progressive Osteoarthritis After Partial Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundProgressive arthritis in the unresurfaced compartments of the knee is one failure mode after partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). While progressive arthritis after PKA is typically treated with revision to TKA (rTKA), staged bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (sBiKA) –the addition of another PKA - is an alternative. This study compared outcomes of sBiKA and rTKA for progressive arthritis after PKA.MethodsA retrospective comparative study of non-consecutive cases at four institutions were performed in patients with an intact PKA, without loosening or wear, who underwent sBiKA (n = 27) or rTKA (n = 30), for progressive osteoarthritis. Outcomes studied were new Knee Society Function and Objective Scores (KSSF, KSSO), KOOS, Jr., ROM, operative times, length of stay, complication rates and the need for reoperations.ResultsMean time to conversion was 7.4 ± 6 years for sBiKA and 9.7 ± 8 for rTKA, P = .178. Patient demographics and pre-operative outcomes were similar among cohorts. At an average of 5.7 ± 3 (sBiKA) and 3.2 ± 2 years (rTKA), KOOS, Jr. significantly improved, P < .001, by an equivalent amount. Post-operative KSSO and KSSF were significantly higher in the sBiKA cohort, respectively, (90.4 ± 10 vs 72.1 ± 20, P < .001) and (80.3 ± 18 vs 67.1 ± 19, P = .011). sBiKA patients had significantly greater improvement in KSSO (30.7 ± 33 vs 5.2 ± 18, P = .003). One sBiKA patient underwent reoperation for continued pain.ConclusionSBiKA has equivalent survivorship, but greater improvement in functional outcomes as rTKA at short to midterm follow-up. Given the shorter operative times and length of stay, sBiKA is a safe and cost-effective alternative to rTKA for progressive osteoarthritis following PKA. Nevertheless, further follow-up is necessary to determine whether sBiKA is a durable option.     

Difference Between Screw Cement Filling and Adequate Osteotomy With Thick Liner for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Rand IIb Tibial Defects

BackgroundThe effectiveness of 2 treatment options, screw-cement fill, and adequate osteotomy with a thick liner, in treating patients with Rand IIb tibial defects (tibial plateau defects to a depth of 5 to 10 millimeters) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not yet been demonstrated. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate the differences between these 2 treatments.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent primary TKA for Rand IIb tibial plateau defects from 2015 to 2020 from a department database. Patients were categorized into the screw-cement and thick liner groups based on the different options used to repair tibial defects. We evaluated Knee Society Score, range of motion (ROM), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in both groups. We also compared differences in prosthesis survival, stiffness, myasthenia, and joint clicking between the 2 groups at mean 2 years postoperatively (range, 2 to 2.3). A power analysis was performed on the number of cases in the cohort.ResultsPostoperative femur-tibia mechanical axis (FTMA) correction was significantly higher in the screw-cement group than in the thick-liner group: 18.8 (±5.6°) versus 15.4 (±5.9°) (P < .01); At mean 2 years after surgery, the American Knee Society Functional Score improvement values were higher in the thick-liner group than in the screw-cement group: 36.3 (±12.4) versus 42.4 (±16.4) (P = .05). Postoperative ISI scores were 0.95 (±0.12) points in the screw-cement group and 0.89 (±0.13) points in the-thick liner group (P = .03). There were no statistically significant differences in the Knee Society Clinical Score, ROM, FJS, stiffness, myasthenia, joint clicking, and revision rate.ConclusionThe results of this study showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 reconstruction strategies of the screw cement fill technique and the adequate osteotomy and thick liner technique for Rand IIb tibial plateau defects. However, in patients who have FTMA deformities greater than 20° or in younger patients who need to preserve bone volume, we recommend the screw cement filling technique to ensure stable postoperative results and to prepare these patients for possible later surgery.     

Titanium Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Good to Excellent Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Metal Allergy Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

BackgroundThe main purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with positive skin patch tests who underwent medial mobile-bearing titanium niobium nitride unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during a mid-term follow-up.MethodsThirty-seven patients with positive skin patch tests were included in this prospective study. The clinical evaluation consisted of Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score (KSS) reports. Each patient was clinically evaluated the day before surgery (T₀) as well as at T₁ (11.9 ± 1.3 months) and during the final follow-up T₂ (67.2 ± 19.1 months). The positioning of the UKA was evaluated during the final follow-up using standardized radiographs (T₂: 67.2 ± 19.1 months).ResultsOxford and KSS ranged from a respective mean preoperative value of 23.0 ± 2.7 and 51.5 ± 5.0 to 42.1 ± 1.7 and 87.6 ± 2.2, respectively, at T₁ (P < .001) and to the final values of 45.0 ± 1.9 and 91.9 ± 3.4, respectively, at T₂ (P < .001 both vs T₁ and T₂). At T₂, the mean femoral angle was 7.0° ± 4.5°, mean tibial angle was 3.0° ± 2.1°, and mean tibial slope was 5.1° ± 3.2°. A significant difference was found between KSS and Oxford with ANOVA for repeated measures over time (P < .001). The Oxford and KSS scores showed significant improvements during each follow-up. No complications were found, and not a single patient required a revision surgery during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe hypoallergenic titanium niobium nitride mobile-bearing UKA showed comparable results to standard CoCr UKA regardless of the gender, age, BMI, and implant size of metal allergy patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Careful patient selection processes and accurate medical histories played key roles in the choice of hypersensitivity-friendly implants.     

No Difference in Postoperative Knee Flexion and Patient Joint Awareness Between Cruciate-Substituting and Cruciate-Retaining Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

BackgroundThis study aimed to clarify differences in clinical results, including in patients’ joint awareness, between cruciate-substituting (CS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a 10-year follow-up.MethodsA total of 333 TKAs were included in this study. There were 257 cases of CS and 76 cases of CR TKAs. Knee range of motion, Knee Society Score, and radiological outcomes were assessed. The patients’ joint awareness was evaluated using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 at the final follow-up. The survival rate with respect to reoperation or revision was analyzed.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 10 ± 1.7 years, and the loss to follow-up was 5.4%. All clinical outcomes improved significantly after surgery in both groups (P < .001). Postoperative knee flexion was 118° ± 13° in the CS group and 116° ± 10° in the CR group (P = .10). The mean Forgotten Joint Score-12 scores were 57 ± 27 points in the CS group and 56 ± 28 points in the CR group (P = .59). Ten years after the operation, the survival rates for reoperation were 96.3% in the CS group and 94.2% in the CR group (P = .61), and those for revision were 98.4% and 98.7% in the CS and CR groups, respectively (P = .87). Other postoperative clinical results did not differ between the 2 groups.ConclusionIn this 10-year follow-up study, medial pivot TKA, regardless of polyethylene insert type, showed a high survival rate and good patient awareness of the prosthetic joint.     

Preoperative Flexion Contracture Does Not Compromise the Outcomes and Survivorship of Medial Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite the expanding indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the classic indication that limits flexion contracture to <5° in fixed bearing UKA excludes most patients with arthritic knees and has not been challenged in modern literature. This study compared the clinical outcomes between patients with severe flexion contracture and controls undergoing UKA.MethodsEighty seven medial fixed bearing UKAs performed in patients with severe (≥15°) flexion contracture were matched 1:1 with 87 controls without flexion or recurvatum deformity (−5°<extension<5°) using propensity scores to control for age, sex, BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, ASA class, and baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Perioperative outcomes were recorded. Range of motion, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, SF-36, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 6 months and 2 years. Survivorship was recorded at mean 11.5 ± 3.2 years.ResultsPreoperative knee extension in the control and contracture groups was 0.9° ± 1.9° and 18.0° ± 3.5° (P < .001), respectively, whereas flexion was 122.8° ± 27.9° and 120.6° ± 13.6° (P = .502). The contracture group had poorer Knee Society functional (P = .023) and SF-36 physical score (P = .010) at 6 months. However, there was no difference in PROMs at 2 years. A similar proportion achieved the minimal clinically important difference for each PROM and was satisfied with surgery. Range of motion remained poorer in the contracture group and a higher percentage had residual contractures (P < .001). Ten-year survivorship was 94% and 97% in the control and contracture groups, respectively (P = .145).ConclusionAlthough patients with severe flexion contractures had a poorer range of motion and postoperatively, these patients attained comparable PROMs, satisfaction rates, and mid-term survivorship after UKA.Level of EvidenceIII, therapeutic study.     

Increased Patellar Fracture Rate in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Preoperative Varus Greater Than 15°: A Case-Control Study

Background

Management of severe varus deformity requires soft tissue balancing for implantation of low-constraint knee prosthesis. Patellar complications have been rarely studied in this specific group. Our hypothesis was that severe genu varum (>15°) would increase the rate of patellar complications.

How Does Preoperative Central Sensitization Affect Quality of Life Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundCentral sensitization (CS) has been recently identified as a significant risk factor for persistent pain and patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it remains unclear as to whether the preoperative CS persists after the elimination of a nociceptive pain source by TKA, or how CS affects the quality of life after TKA.MethodsA total of 222 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were enrolled in the study. All patients were preoperatively screened for CS using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into either a CS (n = 55; CSI ≥ 40) or non-CS group (n = 167; CSI < 40). CSI, pain visual analog scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and satisfaction were recorded at postoperative 2 years.ResultsTwo years after TKA, preoperative CS remained unchanged; there was no difference between preoperative and postoperative CSI scores, and both preoperative and postoperative CSI severity levels were similar (P > .1). The CS group showed worse pain VAS, KSS, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores than did the non-CS group (P < .01) and more patients in the CS group were dissatisfied with all activities (P < .01). However, a similar percentage of the CS group achieved the previously documented minimal clinically important difference in pain VAS and KSS, compared with the non-CS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative CSI scores were associated with dissatisfaction at postoperative 2 years.ConclusionPreoperative CS was persistent at 2 years after TKA. Although CS patients achieved comparable clinical improvement following TKA, CS patients had worse quality of life, functional disability, and dissatisfaction than non-CS patients.     

Effect of Tourniquet Use on Patient Outcomes After Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundTourniquet use is common in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but debate exists regarding its use and effect on patient outcomes. The study purpose was to compare the effect of short tourniquet (ST) time vs long tourniquet (LT) time on pain, opioid consumption, and patient outcomes.MethodsPatients were prospectively randomized to an ST time of 10 min vs LT time. A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary cementless robotic-assisted TKA underwent randomization, with 5 patients unable to complete follow-up, leaving 49 in the ST group and 46 in the LT cohort. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine equivalent, serum creatine kinase, distance walked, range of motion, length of stay (LOS), surgical time, hemoglobin (Hgb), and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were prospectively collected.ResultsVisual analog scale pain was statistically equivalent at 24, 48, and 72 hours and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Morphine equivalent consumption was 36 vs 44 (P = .03), 48 vs 50 (P = .72), 31 vs 28 (P = .57), and 4.7 vs 5.5 (P = .75) in the LT vs ST cohorts at 24 hours, 48 hours, 2weeks, and 6weeks postoperatively. Change in Hgb postoperative day 1 was 2.7 in both groups (P = .975). Postoperative day 1 creatine kinase-MB was 3.7 and 3.0 (P = .30) in LT and ST cohorts. Six-week postoperative KSS Knee and Function scores were 82.4 and 70.5 in LT group vs 80.8 and 72.3 in ST group (P = .61 and P = .63). Postoperative range of motion, LOS, and surgical time were equivalent.ConclusionThis study demonstrates no significant advantage of ST use in primary TKA with respect to opioid consumption, patient-reported pain, KSS scores, LOS, or postoperative Hgb level.