Imaging of Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma

OBJECTIVETo describe the clinical, imaging, and histopathologic findings of intracystic papillary carcinoma (IPC) of the breast.MATERIALS AND METHODSFollowing institutional review board approval, a database at a single institution was searched to identify cases of patients who received a diagnosis of IPC from 1999-2013 and who had undergone preoperative imaging with mammography, sonography, or MRI. The clinical, mammographic, sonographic, and MRI features of IPC were compared and analyzed using the BI-RADS mammography, ultrasound, and MRI lexicons.RESULTSThe study sample included 40 patients, 36 females and 4 males. The most common clinical presentation was a palpable mass. Mammographic data was assessed in 31 patients. A tumor was mammographically occult in one patient. The predominant features were oval shape of 17 tumors (57%), obscured margins of 12 (40%), and high density of 20 (67%). Ultrasound data of 37 patients revealed 20 oval masses, 13 irregular masses, and 4 round masses. Fourteen complex solid and cystic masses were identified. One patient underwent MRI that showed a complex, enhancing mass with washout kinetics. Ultrasound guided biopsy was performed on 33 of the 37 masses. Core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy were most commonly performed on the solid components of the complex solid and cystic masses. IPC was diagnosed by stereotactic biopsy in 1 patient with a suspicious mass on mammography with no correlate on sonography and 6 patients had surgical excision without imaging-guided biopsy.Pathology showed in situ IPC in 31/40 tumors and 11 were solid and cystic complex masses on ultrasound. Pathology revealed invasive IPC in 9 tumors and five had an irregular mass on ultrasound.CONCLUSIONOur study reveals no specific imaging features to differentiate in situ vs invasive IPC. The most common ultrasound feature in biopsy proven IPC was an oval mass, however, we identified that a complex solid and cystic mass is more often associated with the diagnosis of in situ IPC and an irregular mass is more often associated with the diagnosis of invasive IPC. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to further define the clinical and imaging features of this rare malignancy.     

Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the imaging findings of patients with breast cancer negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-so-called "triple receptor-negative cancer"-and to compare the mammographic findings and clinical characteristics of triple receptor-negative cancer with non-triple receptor-negative cancers (i.e., ER-positive, PR-positive, or HER2-positive or two of the three markers positive). CONCLUSION: Triple receptor-negative cancer was most commonly an irregular noncalcified mass with ill-defined or spiculated margins on mammography and a hypoechoic or complex mass with an irregular shape and noncircumscribed margins on ultrasound. Most triple receptor-negative cancers were discovered on physical examination. Compared with non-triple receptor-negative cancers, triple receptor-negative cancers were found in younger women and were a higher pathologic grade.     

Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value: report of 102 cases

The aim of this study was to define the ultrasonographic (US) features of the invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). For this purpose, the clinical histories and the mammographic and sonographic findings observed in 102 patients affected by documented ILC were retrospectively reviewed, and the role and value of US in the diagnosis of palpable and nonpalpable breast tumors were evaluated. At US, five proven tumors were not visualized (sensitivity: 95%), while the remaining 97 showed sonographic images that are considered typically malignant: irregular heterogenic, hypoechoic irregular masses in 94 cases, which were associated with posterior shadowing in 87. The presence of only a posterior shadowing was observed in three cases. There were 16 subclinical tumors, and in two of the four in which a mammography showed an indeterminate lesion, US demonstrated a malignant pattern. All the palpable tumors that were not detected mammographically were demonstrated by US. In 13 of the 102 patients (12.7%), the correct diagnosis of malignancy was established by US. On the basis of the data obtained, it is felt that because of its sensitivity and high specificity for malignancy, US plays a very important role in the diagnosis of ILC, whenever in a patient with positive clinical findings, the mammography is negative or the mammographic features are equivocal.     

Mammographic and clinicopathological features of triple-negative breast cancer

Objective:

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks effective treatment and has a poor prognosis. This study assessed mammographic findings and clinicopathological features of TNBC by comparing with non-TNBC in order to improve clinical diagnosis of TNBC.

Methods:

A total of 426 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer were retrospectively assigned into two groups, TNBC (n = 54) and non-TNBC (n = 372), and then analysed.

Results:

TNBC frequently showed a high histological grade, presented with a mass (79.6%) and was less frequently associated with focal asymmetric density (11.1%), microcalcifications (5.6%) and distortion (3.7%) on mammography. TNBC mammographic masses were most frequently round/oval (58.1%) or lobular (30.2%) in shape and were less frequently irregular in shape (11.6%). Masses with circumscribed margins were the most frequent (37.2%), with microlobulated (25.6%) and obscured (16.3%) margins being commonly observed, but masses with spiculated margins were rare (9.3%).

Conclusion:

TNBC could have distinct mammographic and clinicopathological features compared with non-TNBC, and thus mammography may be useful in the diagnosis of TNBC.

Advances in knowledge:

This study demonstrated distinct mammographic and clinicopathological features to help in diagnosis of Chinese patients with TNBC.Breast cancer is the most common malignancy observed in females. Histologically, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different subtypes and pathology, treatment options and prognosis.¹ Bryan et al² for the first time in 2006 explicitly presented the definition of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) based on the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Other studies using gene expression profiling were able to classify breast cancer into five subtypes.^3,4 To date, TNBC is used frequently as a standard procedure to classify breast cancer patients for clinical care. TNBC is similar to the basal-like subtype, which is characterized by negative ER, PR and HER2 expression, and is associated with aggressive histology, poor prognosis and unresponsiveness to the endocrine therapies.^5,6 Moreover, TNBC has been used as a surrogate marker for the basal-like breast cancer, and approximately 80–90% of TNBCs are basal-like breast cancers.⁷ Younger females have a higher rate of basal or breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation-related TNBC, whereas older females have a higher proportion of apocrine, normal-like and rare subtypes of TNBC, including neuroendocrine TNBC.⁸ Because only fewer specific targeting therapies and molecular therapies (such as endocrine or target therapy) are available than for other subtypes of breast cancer, the standard treatment for TNBC includes surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but clinical outcome is poor.^7,9 Thus, early detection of this subtype of breast cancer is vital to improve the survival of patients.Although TNBC has been studied extensively in clinical and pathological literature, there are few reports on the radiological characteristics of this subtype of breast cancer. To date, mammography is known to be a precise diagnostic technique with high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of breast lesions, and the current reference standard in breast cancer screening is mammography with the sensitivity to detect early-stage breast cancer. Therefore, this study evaluated the mammographic and clinicopathological features of TNBC by comparing these features to those of non-TNBC in order to make a more precise diagnosis.     

Incremental clinical value of ultrasound in men with mammographically confirmed gynecomastia

Purpose

To determine whether ultrasound is of any value in male patients presenting with focal symptoms who have classic features of gynecomastia but no concerning findings on mammography.

Materials and Methods

Over a 3-year period, all male patients who underwent mammographic evaluation were identified in this retrospective study. Patients with a mammographic diagnosis of gynecomastia and subsequent breast ultrasound at a large tertiary academic medical center comprised the study cohort. Men whose ultrasound diagnosis differed from the initial mammographic evaluation were analyzed for both additional benign findings as well as findings that warranted biopsy.

Results

A total of 353 mammograms were obtained from 327 unique patients (ages 18–95, mean 51 years). Of all mammographic examinations, gynecomastia was the sole finding in 73% (259). In those 259 studies, 85% were further evaluated with ultrasound, in which 6 (2.7%) showed additional benign findings, and 4 (1.8%) showed suspicious findings for which biopsy was recommended. No malignancies were detected in those patients. Furthermore, no malignancies were detected in patients whose mammogram revealed only normal fatty parenchyma or only gynecomastia. In all cases of cancer, mammography revealed visible masses.

Conclusion

Judicious use of breast ultrasound in men improves outcome. Our data suggest that targeted ultrasound is of limited value in symptomatic male patients where mammography is negative or reveals only gynecomastia and leads to unnecessary benign biopsies in these patients. When mammography reveals concerning findings, ultrasound adds positively to clinical management.     

Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings

PURPOSE: To determine and quantitate the radiological characteristics of tubular carcinoma of the breast, to report clinical and pathologic findings and to define findings at follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records of 2872 women who received a diagnosis of breast carcinoma between January 1988 and January 2006 revealed 32 histopathologically proven pure tubular carcinoma of the breast. Analysis included history; findings at physical examination, mammography, and sonography (US) at the time of diagnosis and in postoperative follow-up and histopathological results. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of the patients (n=19) presented with a palpable mass. The mammographic findings were a mass in 23 (72%), a mass with microcalcifications in 2 (6%), asymmetric focal density in 1 (3%), architectural distortion in 1 (3%) and negative in 5 (16%) of the 32 patients. Most (96%) masses had spiculated margins. US depicted 30 masses in 29 patients, all of which were hypoechoic, mostly (n=27, 90%) with posterior acoustic shadowing. The cancer was clinically occult in 41% (n=13), mammographically occult in 16% (n=5), and sonographically occult in 6% (n=2) of the patients. Histologically, the tumor was multifocal in 3% (n=1) of the patients. Four (13%) patients developed contralateral breast carcinoma at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Tubular carcinoma has a variety of presentations, but it is mostly seen on mammography as a small spiculated mass, and on sonography as an irregular mass with posterior acoustic shadowing. Although tubular carcinoma is known as a well-differentiated tumor with excellent prognosis, the mammographic follow-up of the contralateral breast is important.     

Comparison of mammographic and sonographic findings in typical and atypical medullary carcinomas of the breast

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the contribution of mammographic and sonographic findings to the discrimination of typical and atypical histopathologic groups of medullary carcinomas of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging findings were retrospectively assessed in 33 women with medullary carcinomas (15 typical medullary carcinomas and 18 atypical medullary carcinomas) identified during pre-operative mammography. Twenty-nine of these women also had ultrasound and these findings were reviewed. RESULTS: Mammography showed a well circumscribed mass in 10 of the 15 (67%) typical medullary carcinomas and in four of the 17 (24%) atypical medullary carcinomas (P < 0.02). One small tumour in a woman with atypical medullary carcinoma was missed on mammography and was shown only on sonography. Sonographically, an irregular margin surrounding the whole mass or part of it was seen in three out of 14 (21%) patients with typical medullary carcinoma and in nine out of 15 (60%) patients with atypical medullary carcinomas (P < 0.05). Posterior acoustic shadowing was more often observed in the typical medullary carcinoma group than in atypical medullary carcinoma and the difference was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). None of the other mammographic and sonographic findings were sufficiently characteristic to allow for a differentiation between two groups. CONCLUSION: When typical medullary carcinomas were compared with atypical medullary carcinomas according to imaging features, they tended to be well circumscribed masses on both mammography and sonography, and a posterior acoustic shadow was not found on sonography. However, the imaging findings in these two subgroups often resembled each other and histopathology will always be required to confirm the diagnosis.     

Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define specific mammographic and sonographic features of tubular carcinoma of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen pathologically confirmed cases of tubular carcinoma were characterized retrospectively by two radiologists. Mammograms and sonograms were available for all patients. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 17 tubular carcinomas appeared as irregularly shaped masses with spiculated margins on mammography. Sixteen of the 17 masses had central densities. Spicules longer than the diameter of the central lesion were noted in eight (53%) of 15 tubular carcinomas. Eight tubular carcinomas had associated calcifications, with calcifications suspected of being malignant in four cases. On sonography, 15 hypoechoic masses were seen. The margins of the masses on sonography were described as ill-defined in 14 (93%) of the 15 cases. Posterior acoustic shadowing was present in 14 of the 15 cases. CONCLUSION: Tubular carcinomas are usually seen on mammography as irregularly shaped masses with central densities and spiculated margins, and most tubular carcinomas can be identified on sonography as hypoechoic masses with ill-defined margins and posterior acoustic shadowing. Although the mammographic and sonographic features of tubular carcinoma are not sufficiently specific to differentiate tubular carcinomas from radial scars, sonography can be useful for guiding biopsies and evaluating for multifocal and multicentric disease.     

Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic findings

PURPOSE: To determine and quantitate radiologic characteristics of tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast and to report clinical and pathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records of 2872 women who received a diagnosis of breast carcinoma between January 1988 and January 2006 revealed 26 histopathologically proven tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast. Analysis included history; findings at physical examination, mammography, and sonography (US) at the time of diagnosis and in postoperative follow-up, and histopathological results. RESULTS: At physical examination, palpable mass was present in 85% (n=22) of the patients. The mammographic findings were mass in 17 (65%), asymmetric focal density in 2 (8%), architectural distortion in 2 (8%) and negative mammograms in 5 (19%) of the 26 patients. US depicted 25 masses in 24 patients, all of which were hypoechoic, with spiculated (n=13) or microlobulated (n=12) margins. The cancer was clinically occult in 12% (n=3), mammographically occult in 19% (n=5), and radiologically occult in 4% (n=1) of the patients. Histologically, the mean size of the tumor was 1.7cm and 18 (69%) patients were node negative. CONCLUSION: Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast usually manifests clinically as a firm, immobile mass and mammographically as a spiculated or ill-defined, irregular, isodense mass without microcalcifications. Common findings on sonography include a homogeneously hypoechoic, spiculated or microlobulated mass with posterior acoustic shadowing or normal acoustic transmission. Tubulolobular carcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis for breast masses with these imaging features.     

Diffractive ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses: preliminary results

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate diffractive ultrasound (US) in the characterization of solid breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with solid breast masses (24 malignant and 24 benign) observed at conventional US underwent targeted diffractive US before needle biopsy or surgery. The process of locating the lesion was performed with knowledge of the mammography and conventional US. On diffractive US, imaging features, including shape, brightness, echotexture, margin, and boundary echo were analyzed and odds ratio (OR) were calculated to show how the risk of malignancy was altered by the presence of a given finding. RESULTS: Of the 48 solid breast masses seen on conventional US, 46 (96%) were seen at diffractive US. Diffractive US features suggestive of malignancy were irregular shape (OR 11.5), sono-opacity (OR 204), spiculated margin (OR 17.0), and absent boundary echo (OR 11.5) or thick rim (OR 5.5), whereas those of benignancy were round shape (OR 0.03), sonotransmission (OR 0.07) or isodensity (OR 0.01), well-defined margin (OR 0.03), and thin capsule (OR 0.03; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The finding of a sono-opaque mass on diffractive US was highly sensitive for malignancy. Further improvement of diffractive US equipment is needed to increase image quality and to permit inclusion of the axillary tail and deep portions of the breast.     

Adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast: imaging findings with histopathologic correlation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this essay is to describe the imaging characteristics of adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast. CONCLUSION: Adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast are rare, and most are benign. The predominant mammographic and ultrasound feature is an irregular mass with suspicious imaging findings. This uncommon condition should be included in the differential diagnosis of noncalcified masses found on mammograms and of solid masses with associated hypervascularity on ultrasound images. Biopsy is necessary for histologic evaluation, and the management is surgical excision.     

The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers

Breast cancers in gene mutation carriers may escape mammographic detection because of rapid growth and tumor expansion. Therefore, they may mimic benign lesions on the mammogram. Twenty-nine BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers under surveillance developed 31 breast cancers between 1994 and 2001 at a mean age of 44.2 years. Controls were 63 women with 67 breast cancers in the same period at a mean age of 53.8 years, also under surveillance because of a life time risk of at least 15%. In 26% of the carriers vs. 48% of the controls, mammography was the method that first suspected a malignancy. Seven radiologists performed a retrospective review of the original mammograms to establish technical assessment, with special attention for circumscribed lesions and estimated probability of malignancy. In the mutation carriers seven (23%) circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses were found and three in the controls (4.5%) P=0.01. These masses were proven to be malignant. In both groups around 70% of these fast-growing circumscribed lesions were detected by the patients. The masses were situated in breasts with a good interpretable breast pattern. BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher percentage of circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses that proved to be malignant. These mammographic lesions in women at high risk should be described as at least Birads 0 and worked-up with ultrasound and needle biopsy.     

Characterization and guided-procedures of breast suspicious microcalcifications: can MicroPure ultrasound do it?

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of high-frequency (MicroPure) ultrasound in evaluating suspicious microcalcifications and to determine its capability in biopsy guidance.

Subjects and methods

Sixty-two cases with suspicious microcalcifications detected on mammographic examination had been re-evaluated by MicroPure US. The studied cases underwent true cut tissue/surgical excision biopsy. Histopathology revealed 25 benign and 37 malignant lesions and was considered the gold standard of reference.

Results

Malignant microcalcifications were easier to be visible at MicroPure US, as they were detected in 86.5% (n = 32/39) compared to only 68% (n = 17/25) of the benign lesions. US depicted more breast masses associated with malignant microcalcifications in 78% (n = 29/37) than those associated with benign ones seen in 36% (n = 9/25).Visibility of suspicious microcalcifications at US was aided by preliminary mammogram. Given known mammography location of these microcalcifications had made their visualization accessible by MicroPure US in 79% (n = 49) of the cases.

Conclusion

MicroPure ultrasound cannot discriminate benign from malignant breast microcalcifications. MicroPure can be useful in detecting clustered microcalcifications that are not accessible by B-mode ultrasound; provided knowledge of their mammographic location and thus can provide better guidance for pre-surgical wire localization and ultrasound-guided biopsies.     

Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether nonpalpable solid breast masses that were partially or completely obscured at mammography and diagnosed as probably benign only at ultrasonography (US) can be safely managed with follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics committee approved this study; informed consent was not required. In 409 women, 448 nonpalpable solid masses were identified and classified as probably benign at US; at mammography these masses were either partially or completely obscured by dense fibroglandular tissue. Of the 448 masses, 445 were followed up, while biopsy was performed after initial imaging in the remaining three. False-negative rates, negative predictive values (NPVs), and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 445 masses, 442 remained stable at follow-up (range, 2-5 years; mean, 3.3 years). Two masses increased (fibroadenomas at biopsy). One mass became palpable, and cancer was diagnosed at biopsy. The three masses in which initial biopsy was performed were fibroadenomas. The false-negative rate was 0.2% (one of 448; NPV, 99.8%; 95%CI: 0.0%, 1.23%). CONCLUSION: Follow-up US appears to be an acceptable alternative to biopsy for solid masses with benign morphologic features seen at US owing to the extremely high NPV (99.8%).     

Imaging, histology and hormonal features of five cases of male breast cancer observed in a single year: comparison with the literature

PURPOSE: The authors assessed mammographic and ultrasound (US) features and histological and biological characteristics of male breast carcinomas observed in five men (mean age 57.8 years) in a single year and compared the findings with the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients underwent history taking and bilateral mammography and US examination extended to the axillary region and complemented with colour Doppler US. RESULTS: Three out of five patients had a family history of breast cancer, and all of them had an altered energy balance (mean body mass index 30.8). All subjects had a palpable mass, which was associated with bloody nipple discharge in two cases. Mammography identified all lesions as opacities with irregular margins (mean size 1.98 cm); in one case, it also revealed a nonpalpable contralateral lesion. US demonstrated the presence of inhomogeneously hypoechoic nodules with irregular margins and centrifugal vascular spots in 4/6 lesions. Histology diagnosed invasive ductal cancer (IDC) in 5/6 lesions (83.3%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the contralateral lesion only. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of symptoms warrants mammography, which is an accurate method for identifying male breast cancer. The frequency of invasive disease observed in our study was consistent with the literature (80%-90% IDC). The hormonal alterations induced by excess fat in our series appear to be correlated with the development of carcinomas with positive receptor status for both oestrogen and progesterone.     

US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications

PURPOSE: To determine whether ultrasonography (US) can depict breast masses associated with mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications and whether the visibility at US is different between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with 100 mammographically detected microcalcification clusters prospectively underwent US with a 10- or 12-MHz transducer before mammographically guided presurgical hook-wire localization. The visibility of breast masses at US was correlated with histologic and mammographic findings. RESULTS: Surgical biopsy revealed 62 benign lesions, 30 intraductal cancers, and eight invasive cancers. At US, breast masses associated with microcalcifications were seen in 45 (45%) of 100 cases. US depicted more breast masses associated with malignant (31 [82%] of 38) than with benign (14 [23%] of 62) microcalcifications (P: <.001). In malignant microcalcification clusters larger than 10 mm, US depicted associated breast masses in all 25 cases. There was no statistically significant difference in shape and distribution of calcific particles, as well as in breast composition, at mammography between US visible and invisible groups. CONCLUSION: Given a known mammographic location, US with a high-frequency transducer can depict breast masses associated with malignant microcalcifications, particularly clusters larger than 10 mm. US can be used to visualize large clusters of microcalcifications that have a very high suspicion of malignancy.     

Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography

PURPOSE: To review ultrasound (US) findings in patients who have suspicious microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A) on screening mammography and to evaluate helpful findings in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2006, 192 patients showed microcalcifications only, without mass or associated density, on screening mammography. Among them, we selected 82 patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (category 4A) that were pathologically confirmed by surgical excision after wire localization (n=23) or biopsy (n=59). Breast US was performed in 37/82 cases and we analyzed the US findings for the calcification areas in these patients, evaluating the findings with benign or malignant pathological results. We correlated US findings with mammographic calcifications using mammography-guided 2D-localization for the calcifications before US examination. RESULTS: There were 12 malignant lesions (32.4%) including 3 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), one microinvasive ductal carcinoma (MIDC), 8 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 benign lesions (67.6%) including 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH). IDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or calcifications within complex hypoechoic masses of taller-than-wide shape on US. One MIDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma and six DCIS showed negative findings, or calcifications with a small nodule, or only calcifications on US. The most common positive US finding in benign lesions was cysts with calcifications. In 24/37 cases (64.8%) with negative US findings, 18 (75%) were benign lesions and 6 (25%) were DCIS. CONCLUSION: In patients with category 4A microcalcifications without associated findings on screening mammography, negative US findings had a high rate of benign results (18/24, 75%). Visible calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or mass on US increased the probability of malignancy.     

Neuroendocrine differentiated breast carcinoma: imaging features correlated with clinical and histopathological findings

The aim of this study was to describe the imaging features of neuroendocrine differentiated breast carcinoma (NEDBC) and to correlate the radiological findings with the clinical and histopathological findings. A retrospective review of the mammograms of 1845 histopathologically proven breast cancer cases revealed five NEDBC. The clinical, imaging, and histopathological findings were analyzed. On mammography, a high-density mass was seen in all patients. The shape of the mass was round in 4 and irregular in 1 patient. The margins were spiculated in 2, indistinct in 1, microlobulated in 1, and partially obscured in 1 patient. On sonography, 4 patients had homogeneously hypoechoic masses with normal sound transmission. In 1 patient the mass was heterogeneously hypoechoic with mild posterior acoustic enhancement. The margins were microlobulated in 2, irregular in 2, and well-circumscribed in 1 patient. Neuroendocrine differentiated breast carcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of mammographically dense, round masses with predominantly spiculated or lobulated margins. Sonographically, they mostly present as irregular or microlobulated, homogeneously hypoechoic masses with normal sound transmission. Electronic Publication     

Ultrasound and MR imaging of diabetic mastopathy

AIM: To review the imaging findings of diabetic mastopathy, and document the colour flow ultrasound and MR imaging features in this benign condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diabetic mastopathy was clinically and histologically diagnosed in eight lesions in six women. All six women underwent conventional mammography and high frequency grey-scale ultrasound. Colour flow ultrasound was performed additionally in six lesions in four women and MR imaging in four lesions in three women before biopsy. The imaging findings were reviewed and correlated with final histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Mammography showed regional asymmetric increased opacity with ill-defined margins in all lesions. A heterogeneously hypoechoic mass with ill-defined margins was identified on high frequency grey-scale ultrasound in all lesions. Marked posterior acoustic shadowing was present in seven of eight (88%) lesions. Six lesions interrogated with colour flow ultrasound showed absence of Doppler signal. MR imaging in three women revealed non-specific stromal enhancement. CONCLUSION: Diabetic mastopathy shows absence of Doppler signal on colour flow ultrasound and non-specific stromal enhancement on MR imaging.     

The correlation of mammographic-and histologic patterns of breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers, compared to age-matched sporadic controls

Breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers often have specific histologic features: grade III tumors with pushing margins. Our purpose was to compare the mammographic and histologic features of breast cancers in carriers with those in age-matched sporadic controls. The features of breast cancers in 27 BRCA1 carriers found during annual surveillance were compared to those in 107 age-matched sporadic controls. The carriers had no (classic) spiculated mammographic lesions, a high percentage of well-defined masses and hardly any masses with microcalcifications, whereas the controls had significantly fewer well-defined ones and only in 27% spiculated lesions on the mammogram. The well-defined mammographic tumors correlated in 83% of the carriers and in 70% of the controls with histologic circumscribed tumor margins. Spiculated mammographic lesions in the controls were in 90% grade I or II tumors. DCIS with or without infiltration was seen in 22% of the carriers and in 45% of the controls. In conclusion, breast cancers diagnosed in BRCA1 carriers do not have classic malignant mammographic features. A minority of the young sporadic controls show the classic malignant lesion on the mammogram. Both carriers and controls generally show a good correlation between their mammographic- and histologic tumor pattern.