Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patients

Amprenavir (APV) is an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) used for the treatment of either naive or PI-experienced HIV-infected patients. Several genotypic resistance pathways in protease gene have been described to be associated to unboosted APV failure (I50V, V32I + I47V, I54L/M, or less commonly I84V, which may be accompanied by one ore more accessory mutations such as L10F, L33F, M46I/L). The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy up to week 24 of an APV plus ritonavir containing regimen in PI experienced patients and to determine the genotypic resistance profiles emerging in patients failing to this therapy. Forty-nine, PI experienced but APV naïve patients were treated with APV (600 mg bid) plus ritonavir (100 mg bid). By intent-to-treat analysis, the median decrease in viral load (VL) was −1.32 log10 (min +0.6; max −2.8) and −1.46 log10 (min +0.5; max −2.8) 12 and 24 weeks after initiating APV plus ritonavir regimen, respectively. Twelve patients harboured a VL >200 copies/ml at week 24. Among these patients, the selection of mutations previously described with the use of APV as first PI (V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I50V, 54M/L, and I84V) was observed. However, in some cases, mutations classically described after the use of other PIs (V82F and L90M) were selected but always with APV-specific mutations. There was no relation between the resistance pathways selected with either APV or ritonavir plasma minimal concentration, but higher APV plasma minimal concentration were associated with a lower rate of resistance mutations selection. J. Med. Virol. 74:16–20, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Detection and quantification of proviral HIV-1 184 M/V in circulating CD4(+) T cells of patients on HAART with a viremia less than 1,000 copies/ml.

BACKGROUND: Highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) effectively reduces HIV replication but does not completely hinder it. Sub-optimal therapy leads to HIV resistance to the drugs administered. However, the role of low-level viremia (viral-load less than 1,000 copies/ml) on mutation genesis and incorporation of resistant forms in the long-lived CD4(+) T cellular DNA compartment is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between lamivudine associated mutant-type 184 V and the wild-type 184 M proviral forms in the circulating CD4(+) T cells of patients and low-level viremia. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 50 patients on long-term HAART, with a viremia of less than 1 000 copies/ml. Patients were stratified into three groups; on lamivudine, group I (viral load <20 copies/ml), group II (viral load 20-1000 copies/ml) and as lamivudine experienced, group III (viral load <1000 copies/ml). 184 M and 184 V proviral HIV-1 was detected and quantified by a specific and sensitive assay combining a TaqMan real-time PCR analysis with the amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS) principle. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients with low-level viremia had 184 V in the CD4(+) T cellular DNA compartment as compared to only 8% in those with undetectable viremia. The presence of 184 V was significantly associated with a higher viral load (P=0.001). Patients with low-level viremia without 184 V in the CD4(+) T cellular DNA compartment, had a median plasma viral load of 135 copies/ml, while patients harbouring 184 V had a median viral load of 498 copies/ml (P=0.006). No significant differences between the groups were observed in proviral HIV-1 DNA load. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of the 184 V mutation was significantly lower, in the CD4(+) T cellular compartment of patients with a viral load of less than 20 copies/ml as compared to patients with a viremia of 20-1,000 copies/ml. Viremia, sustained below 20 copies/ml may prevent the appearance of 184 V mutation in this reservoir and therefore should be the objective of treatment.     

The use of drug resistance algorithms and genotypic inhibitory quotient in prediction of lopinavir-ritonavir treatment response in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

BackgroundDifferent approaches using genotypic, pharmacokinetic parameters or combination of both have been recently developed to monitor antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals. Their uses in clinical practice may improve the benefit of protease inhibitor-based salvage therapy while reducing treatment toxicity and emergence of viral resistance.ObjectivesTo assess the prediction of genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) using different genotypic drug resistance interpretation's algorithms and lopinavir plasma concentration in PI-experienced patients treated by lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) was also evaluated.Study designForty-seven HIV-1 PI-experienced, but LPV naïve patients were included in a retrospective cohort study. Plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL), CD4 cell count and LPV plasma concentrations were assessed at weeks (W) 12 and 24. Interpretation of baseline resistance genotype was achieved according to four different algorithms and GSS calculated using two expert systems. GIQ was defined as the ratio of LPV concentration to the number of LPV resistance mutations at day 0 (D0) and patients classified by units of GIQ. The end point of the study was the virological response expressed in HIV VL median decrease from D0 to W24.ResultsThe overall median VL decrease from D0 to W24 was −2.42 log₁₀ copies/mL and 60% of patients had VL below 400 copies/mL. The LPV mutation score was predictive of response for all algorithms whereas plasma concentrations of LPV were not. Mean VL decrease was greater for higher GIQ classes and difference reached statistical significance at W24. When considering virological response at W24, GSS calculated with ANRS and Stanford system were good predictor scores as areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were 0.76 for both.ConclusionGIQ was found to be a useful drug-monitoring tool which could be helpful in targeting LPV concentrations in order to achieve long-term undetectable viral load, particularly in genotypic resistant patients.     

Resistance to antiretroviral therapy among patients in Uganda

OBJECTIVE: To characterize HIV-1 phenotypic resistance patterns and genotypic mutations among patients taking antiretroviral medications in Uganda. METHODS: We reviewed charts and retrieved archived plasma specimens from patients at an AIDS specialty center in Uganda where antiretroviral therapy has been used since 1996. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance testing was done on specimens associated with a viral load of 1000 copies/ml. RESULTS: Resistance testing of specimens was completed for 16 patients. Among 11 specimens collected before initiation of antiretroviral therapy, no phenotypic resistance or primary genotypic mutations were found. Among 8 patients taking lamivudine, phenotypic resistance was found for 9 (90%) of 10 specimens and was associated with an M184V mutation in all nine cases. Among 12 patients taking zidovudine, no phenotypic resistance and few primary mutations were found. For 6 patients who were receiving protease inhibitors, we observed no phenotypic resistance and only one primary genotypic mutation associated with resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of apparent resistance among samples collected before antiretroviral therapy supports the notion that a similar approach to selection of antiretroviral therapy can generally be used against non-B subtypes. A genotypic marker of antiretroviral resistance to lamivudine in HIV-1 subtypes A, C, and D was similar to those in subtype B infections. These results suggest that the methods used for monitoring for the emergence of drug resistance in antiretroviral programs in Africa may be similar to those used in developed settings.     

Antiretroviral Genotypic Resistance Mutations in HIV-1 Infected Korean Patients with Virologic Failure

Resistance assays are useful in guiding decisions for patients experiencing virologic failure (VF) during highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We investigated antiretroviral resistance mutations in 41 Korean human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected patients with VF and observed immunologic/virologic response 6 months after HAART regimen change. Mean HAART duration prior to resistance assay was 45.3±27.5 months and commonly prescribed HAART regimens were zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir (22.0%) and zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz (19.5%). Forty patients (97.6%) revealed intermediate to high-level resistance to equal or more than 2 antiretroviral drugs among prescribed HAART regimen. M184V/I mutation was observed in 36 patients (87.7%) followed by T215Y/F (41.5%) and M46I/L (34%). Six months after resistance assay and HAART regimen change, median CD4+ T cell count increased from 168 cells/µL (interquartile range [IQR], 62-253) to 276 cells/µL (IQR, 153-381) and log viral load decreased from 4.65 copies/mL (IQR, 4.18-5.00) to 1.91 copies/mL (IQR, 1.10-3.60) (P<0.001 for both values). The number of patients who accomplished viral load <400 copies/mL was 26 (63.4%) at 6 months follow-up. In conclusion, many Korean HIV-1 infected patients with VF are harboring strains with multiple resistance mutations and immunologic/virologic parameters are improved significantly after genotypic resistance assay and HAART regimen change.     

Predictive value of drug levels, HIV genotyping, and the genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on response to saquinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients

Plasma levels of HIV protease inhibitors (PI) are often close to IC50 values of wild-type viruses when administered without ritonavir boosting. The impact of drug levels, resistance mutations, and the genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) were examined on the response to saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r)-based salvage therapy. Patients with prior exposure to PI other than SQV and currently failing virologically were recruited prospectively in a multicenter trial. All patients began SQV/r 1000/100 mg bid plus another two antiretrovirals. A total of 139 patients was enrolled. At month 12, virological response (VR), defined as plasma HIV-RNA decline >1 log, was recorded in 68.2% of patients on treatment (41.7% in the intent-to-treat analysis). The median baseline number of protease resistance mutations was three. The VR was significantly lower in patients with >5 protease resistance mutations and in those with plasma SQV Cmin<0.1 microg/ml. At week 48, the VR was seen in 77.1% of patients with a GIQ>0.04 compared to 18.2% of those with a lower GIQ (P=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, 0.1 microg/ml were independently associated with VR. Interestingly, drug levels had their highest predictive value of the VR at week 12, since low SQV plasma levels often permitted ruling out poorly adherent patients. In contrast, the number of protease resistance mutations had the highest impact on the VR at week 24, suggesting that for those taking the drugs, the VR is highly dependent of the presence of resistance mutations. At any time, nevertheless, the GIQ provided the most accurate prediction of the VR.     

Switching to darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once‐daily containing regimen maintains virological control in fully suppressed pre‐treated patients infected with HIV‐1

The objective of this study was to evaluate the switch to once‐daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in treatment‐experienced patients with suppressed HIV‐1 replication on a twice‐daily ritonavir‐boosted protease‐inhibitor (bid PI/r) containing regimen, that is in a setting where genotypic resistance test cannot be performed. In this open label, non‐comparative, multicenter study, patients on a bid PI/r‐containing triple combination, with suppressed viral replication, were switched to once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing triple combination. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml 24 weeks after the switch. Intensive darunavir pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at Week 4 (W4) in 11 patients. Eighty‐five patients were enrolled. All had HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening with a pre‐exposure to a median of 2 PI/r (1–5). By intent‐to‐treat analysis (missing = failure), 78/85 patients (92%, 95% CI [83;96]) maintained an HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Seven patients experienced protocol‐defined treatment failure between baseline and W24: Two had confirmed low‐level viral rebound, one discontinued study treatment for adverse event, three withdrew their consent, and one was lost to follow‐up. By on‐treatment analysis, 78/80 patients (97%, 95% CI [91;99]) maintained an HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Results were similar at Week 48. The median area under the darunavir plasma concentration–time curve measured in 11 patients was 61,380 ng hr/ml; darunavir median trough concentration 1,340 ng/ml and darunavir half‐life was 12.2 hr. Tolerability of once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg was excellent. Optimally suppressed, treatment‐experienced patients can switch safely from a twice‐daily PI/r regimen to a once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing regimen. J. Med. Virol. 85:8–15, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic of once-daily boosted saquinavir (1500/100 mg) together with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in real life: a multicentre prospective study

Background

Ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQVr) is nowadays regarded as an alternative antiretroviral drug probably due to several drawbacks, such as its high pill burden, twice daily dosing and the requirement of 200 mg ritonavir when given at the current standard 1000/100 mg bid dosing. Several once-daily SQVr dosing schemes have been studied with the 200 mg SQV old formulations, trying to overcome some of these disadvantages. SQV 500 mg strength tablets became available at the end of 2005, thus facilitating a once-daily regimen with fewer pills, although there is very limited experience with this formulation yet.

Methods

Prospective, multicentre study in which efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a regimen of once-daily SQVr 1500/100 mg plus 2 NRTIs were evaluated under routine clinical care conditions in either antiretroviral-naïve patients or in those with no previous history of antiretroviral treatments and/or genotypic resistance tests suggesting SQV resistance. Plasma SQV trough levels were measured by HPLV-UV.

Results

Five hundred and fourteen caucasian patients were included (47.2% coinfected with hepatitis C and/or B virus; 7.8% with cirrhosis). Efficacy at 52 weeks (plasma RNA-HIV <50 copies/ml) was 67.7% (CI₉₅: 63.6 - 71.7%) by intention-to-treat, and 92.2% (CI₉₅: 89.8 - 94.6%) by on-treatment analysis. The reasons for failure were: dropout or loss to follow-up (18.4%), virological failure (7.8%), adverse events (3.1%), and other reasons (4.6%). The high rate of dropout may be explained by an enrollement and follow-up under routine clinical care condition, and a population with a significant number of drug users. The median SQV Cmin (n = 49) was 295 ng/ml (range, 53-2172). The only variable associated with virological failure in the multivariate analysis was adherence (OR: 3.36; CI95, 1.51-7.46, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Our results suggests that SQVr (1500/100 mg) once-daily plus 2 NRTIs is an effective regimen, without severe clinical adverse events or hepatotoxicity, scarce lipid changes, and no interactions with methadone. All these factors and its once-daily administration suggest this regimen as an appropriate option in patients with no SQV resistance-associated mutations.     

Diverse pattern of protease inhibitor resistance mutations in HIV-1 infected patients failing nelfinavir

The aim of the study was to describe the pattern of resistance mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1) infected patients experiencing their first protease inhibitor (PI) failure on nelfinavir (NFV)‐containing therapy. Earlier PI‐naïve patients (n = 172) with NFV‐containing therapy were therefore retrospectively studied. Plasma HIV RNA from 43 failing patients was sequenced. In addition, virus from the baseline was sequenced in 29 patients. Failure was defined as two consecutive measurements of viral load of >50 copies/ml after 6 months treatment. Subtyping was done in most patients (n = 118). At baseline, the V82A mutation was found in four PI‐naïve patients of whom two failed therapy exhibiting this mutation. At therapy failure, 17 of the 43 (40%) patients had primary PI mutations. In nine subjects, RTI‐mutations only were found and 17 patients had a wild‐type virus. Patients with primary PI and/or RTI mutations had a higher viral load at failure than those who failed with wild‐type virus. A surprisingly diverse pattern of primary PI mutations was seen: M46I (n = 7), D30N (n = 6), L90M (n = 5), and V82A (n = 4). Four patients exhibited more than one primary PI mutation. PI‐naïve patients in Sweden may harbor PI‐resistant virus and resistance testing should be considered before treatment. Patients who fail NFV may develop the M46I mutation, which has been related earlier to mainly other PI. The diverse pattern of the evolved PI‐mutations and the relative low occurrence of the D30N mutation in the material was unexpected and did not seem to be related to the viral subtype. J. Med. Virol. 76:447–451, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A randomized controlled trial of the value of phenotypic testing in addition to genotypic testing for HIV drug resistance: evaluation of resistance assays (ERA) trial investigators

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical utility of phenotypic resistance testing in addition to genotypic resistance testing among HIV-1-infected patients experiencing virologic failure and with limited therapeutic options. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized trial. METHODS: Patients were eligible if a decision had been made to switch antiretroviral therapy, the most recent HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load (VL) exceeded 2000 copies/mL, and the clinician was unable to select a potent regimen of 3 or more drugs without access to a resistance test. Subjects were randomized to genotypic resistance testing alone (G arm) or to genotypic plus phenotypic testing (G + P arm). Patients had access to resistance testing at any time during follow-up (minimum of 1 year) according to the original allocation. The primary end point was change in plasma VL from baseline at 12 months. RESULTS: Three hundred eleven patients were recruited between February 2000 and July 2001. At baseline, mean VL and CD4 count were 4.23 log10 copies/mL and 275 cells/mm, respectively, and subjects had previous exposure to a mean of 7.7 antiretroviral drugs. There was no appreciable difference between the study arms in the drug regimens prescribed after randomization. Mean reduction in VL load at 12 months was similar in the 2 arms (G: 1.37 log10 reduction, G + P: 1.28 log10 reduction; P = 0.77), as was the proportion of subjects with VL <50 copies/mL (G: 35%, G + P: 27%). CONCLUSION: The study did not demonstrate added value of phenotypic resistance testing in conjunction with genotypic resistance testing in patients with limited therapeutic options.     

Use of viral load measured after 4 weeks of highly active antiretroviral therapy to predict virologic outcome at 24 weeks for HIV-1-positive individuals

Early prediction of suboptimal viral response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is vital to prevent early development of drug resistance. We used logistic regression to predict the odds of achieving virologic suppression (<50 copies/mL) after 24 weeks of HAART in 656 antiretroviral-naive patients starting HAART at the J.W. Goethe University, Chelsea and Westminster, and Royal Free Hospitals according to their week 4 viral load. Therapy changes involving the switch of a single antiretroviral were assumed to have occurred for toxicity reasons and ignored. Because complete regimen changes or additions of new antiretrovirals could be due to virologic failure, patients were counted as virological failures at week 24. Three hundred sixty (84%) of 430 patients with viral loads of <1000 copies/mL, 106 (61%) of 175 with viral loads between 1001 and 10,000 copies/mL, 11 (37%) of 30 with viral loads between 10,001 and 100,000 copies/mL, and 5 (24%) of 21 with viral loads of >100,000 copies/mL at week 4 subsequently attained virologic suppression at 24 weeks. The odds of attaining virologic suppression at 24 weeks was 65% lower for every 1-log higher viral load at week 4 (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45). The proportion of patients with an undetectable viral load at 24 weeks among those who have not attained a viral load of <1000 copies/mL by 4 weeks is quite low. We suggest that this group of patients should be particularly closely monitored.     

Early Virologic Failure and Rescue Therapy of Tenofovir,Abacavir, and Lamivudine for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 Infection: TONUS Study

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of the triple NRTI combination of abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), and tenofovir (TDF) in a once-daily regimen. Method: 38 HIV-naive patients (pts) were treated in a prospective open-arm study over 48 weeks (W48). Virological failure was defined as never achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL or rebound of ≥0.7 log₁₀. Results: 12/36 (33%) pts had virologic failure at W24 and 10 additional pts had HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at W12 or W24. There was a significant association between baseline viral load (VL) and virologic failure in 0%, 29%, and 64% pts with baseline VL levels <4, 4-5, and >5 log₁₀ copies/mL, respectively (p = .014). 76% of pts developed K65R and M184V/I mutations by W24, and 19% developed M184V/I alone. At W4, 86% of pts had adequate plasma C_min for the 3 drugs. 14 pts with K65R and M184V/I were given a rescue therapy with a successful outcome (<50 copies/mL; median follow-up 48 weeks). Conclusion: Convergent genetic pathway to resistance, in conjunction with lower antiretroviral potency, may explain the high rate of selection K65R and M184V mutations. These mutations did not appear to have a negative effect on rescue therapy with a variety of regimens.