Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and entrance skin dose (ESD) for film-screen and computed chest radiography. Analysis of the image quality and dose on chest radiography was carried out on a conventional X-ray unit using film-screen, storage phosphor plates and selenium drum direct chest radiography. For each receptor, ESD was measured in 60 patients using thermoluminescent dosemeters. Images were printed on 35 x 43 cm films. Image quality was assessed subjectively by evaluation of anatomic features and estimation of the image quality, following the guidelines established by the protocols of the Commission of the European Communities. There was no statistically significant difference noted between the computed and conventional images (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P > 0.05). Imaging of the mediastinum and peripheral lung structures were better visualized with the storage phosphor and selenium drum technique than with the film-screen combination. The patients' mean ESD for chest radiography using the storage phosphor, film-screen combination and selenium drum was 0.20, 0.20 and 0.25 mGy, respectively, with no statistically significant difference with P > 0.05 (chi(2) tests).     

Radiation exposure reduction by use of Kevlar cassettes in the neonatal nursery

A study was performed to determine whether the use of Kevlar cassettes in the neonatal intensive care nursery would reduce radiation exposure to patients. The radiation dose to the neonates was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters. In addition, the attenuation of the Kevlar cassettes and the sensitivity of the film-screen combination were compared with the previously used system. The greatest radiation reduction using a mobile X-ray unit was 27%; based on sensitivity measurements, the theoretical reduction averaged 38%. The reduction in radiation exposure resulted from reduced attenuation by the Kevlar cassette.     

Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical chest radiographs of a large-area, flat-panel digital radiography system and a conventional film-screen radiography system. The comparison was based on an observer preference study of image quality and visibility of anatomic structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine follow-up chest radiographs were obtained from 100 consecutive oncology patients using a large-area, amorphous silicon flat-panel detector digital radiography system (dose equivalent to a 400-speed film system). Hard-copy images were compared with previous examinations of the same individuals taken on a conventional film-screen system (200-speed). Patients were excluded if changes in the chest anatomy were detected or if the time interval between the examinations exceeded 1 year. Observer preference was evaluated for the image quality and the visibility of 15 anatomic structures using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Dose measurements with a chest phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 50% with the digital radiography system compared with the film-screen radiography system. The image quality and the visibility of all but one anatomic structure of the images obtained with the digital flat-panel detector system were rated significantly superior (p < or = 0.0003) to those obtained with the conventional film-screen radiography system. CONCLUSION: The image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on the images obtained by the flat-panel detector system were perceived as equal or superior to the images from conventional film-screen chest radiography. This was true even though the radiation dose was reduced approximately 50% with the digital flat-panel detector system.     

Single exposure simultaneous acquisition of digital and conventional radiographs utilizing unaltered dose

We describe the simultaneous acquisition of digital and conventional radiographs with a single standard radiographic exposure. A digitizable storage phosphor (ST Imaging Plate, FujiTM) is sandwiched into a radiographic cassette (X-Omatic, KodakTM) behind a conventional radiographic film-screen combination (Lanex medium screens, OC film, KodakTM). The barium fluorohalide storage phosphor is digitized with a helium-neon laser scanner (TCR 201, ToshibaTM), and the conventional radiograph is processed in the standard fashion (M7B, KodakTM). The storage phosphor is exposed by the "wasted" radiation normally exiting the back of the film-screen combination (32% of the cassette entrance dose at 141 kVp). At a standard exposure (6.3 mAs), the conventional radiograph is of unaltered quality, and the digital image appears to have an adequate signal-to-noise ratio for chest studies despite the lower exposure dose. This technique produces twin images of identical spatial and temporal registration and avoids the added radiation exposure normally required to carry out comparative studies.     

Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure

A digital system for chest radiography based on a large image intensifier was compared with a conventional film-screen system. The diagnostic performance was evaluated with special reference to the digital monitor images with a modified version of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis--free response ROC (FROC) analysis--on a chest equivalent phantom. Measurements of spatial resolution and energy imparted were also performed. The detectability of low-contrast objects as well as spatial resolution was better for the full-size film-screen radiographs than for both the digital monitor images and the 100 mm photofluorograms. The image-intensifier system has a potential for considerable dose savings in relation to the conventional technique provided that fluoroscopy is excluded in the positioning of the patients.     

An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine]

The costs of a conventional film-screen radiography daylight-system and storage-phosphor computed radiography (Fuji AC-1) are compared. In 1990, 3841 radiologic procedures (mostly portable chest X-rays) were performed in 3474 patients of a surgical intensive care unit. With conventional film-screen radiography 6.8% retakes were necessary for diagnostic or technical reasons. Comparing the fixed and variable costs of both systems conventional film-screen radiography was more economic under the given conditions of the test. It is concluded that computed radiography in intensive care patients has definite advantages in terms of image quality and reproducibility, however, in order to compete successfully in the economic turf CR has to be implemented in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS).     

A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography

A simple approach based on phantom measurements is proposed in this study to find the filtration, tube potential and antiscatter device that are optimal in respect of patient dose and image quality, at constant film-screen combination, film processing and viewing conditions. An original quasi-anthropomorphic chest phantom was exposed with 18 different beam qualities and three antiscatter devices. The entrance surface dose, organ doses and effective dose were estimated for each radiograph. The image quality was compared using two objective quality indexes, a contrast index and a scatter fraction, as well as two subjective indexes, a low contrast visualization index and a high contrast visualization index. It was found that for this X-ray unit, routinely using a 7:1 antiscatter grid, the optimal imaging technique is added filtration of 0.1 mm Cu+1 mm Al at a tube potential 100 kVp. Using a 25 cm air gap instead of the grid allows the tube potential to be increased to the upper limit of 120 kVp for this unit. The entrance surface dose of 0.075 mGy at 120 kVp with an air gap is less than half the value of the same quantity with a grid at 100 kVp and is significantly below the European reference level of 0.3 mGy. This phantom method, comprising both objective measurements and subjective estimation, is suitable for dose-image quality optimization in a clinical environment.     

Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality of a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system in chest radiography, we conducted an observer preference study. A clinical comparative study was conducted of the flat-panel system versus the storage phosphor and standard film-screen systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine chest radiographs (posteroanterior) of 30 patients that were obtained using flat-panel, storage phosphor, and film screen systems were compared. The visibility of 10 anatomic regions and the overall image quality criteria were rated independently by three radiologists using a 5-point scale. The significance of the differences in diagnostic performance was tested with a Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Dose measurements for the three modalities were performed. RESULTS: The flat-panel radiography system showed an improved visibility in most anatomic structures when compared with a state-of-the-art conventional film-screen system and an equal visibility when compared with a storage phosphor system. The flat-panel system showed the greatest enhancement in the depiction of small detailed structures (p < 0.05) and achieved this with a reduction in overall radiation dose of more than 50%. CONCLUSION: The visibility of anatomic structures provided by this flat-panel detector system is as good as if not better than that provided by conventional or storage phosphor systems while emitting a reduced radiation dose.     

Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies

PURPOSE: To compare the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) for a normal patient, measured on three types of dedicated digital equipment for chest radiography: an amorphous selenium system, a CR (Computed Radiography) system, and a system for direct radiography (DR) based on an amorphous silicon active matrix (a-Si) connected to a CsI(T1) detector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ESD values were measured with different dosimeters placed in the air parallel to the detector plane, and at a distance equal to the thickness of a normal-build patient. The measurements were taken with the radiological parameters (Posterior-Anterior projection (PA) and Lateral projection (L)) used in diagnostic practice to obtain high-quality diagnostic radiographic images. The measurements taken with the DR equipment were repeated after the manufacturer added a 0.2 mm-thick Cu filter. The ESD values obtained by this series of measurements were reported as mean and standard deviation values (M+/-SD). RESULTS: With the PA projection, the doses measured for the different devices were the following: amorphous selenium system 0.12+/-0.06 mGy, CR system 0.3+/-0.05 mGy, DR system 0.05+/-0.02 mGy. With the L projection: amorphous selenium system 0.40+/-0.13 mGy, CR system 0.9+/-0.17 mGy, and DR system 0.21+/-0.15 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of digital systems allows a significant reduction of the patient dose. In particularly the Direct Radiography system, based on a CsI/a-Si detector, administers the lowest patient dose.     

Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor

In this pilot study, conventional and digital radiography of the chest was compared in 170 patients. Two digitized radiographs, one frequency modified and one simulating the conventional film-screen combination, and the conventional films were reviewed independently by 5 radiologists with different experience. In spite of the smaller size and lower spatial resolution of the digitized compared with the conventional radiograph, only slight differences were revealed in the observation of different pulmonary and mediastinal changes. Digitized radiography is therefore considered suitable for chest examinations.     

Evaluation of heart size and pulmonary vasculature. Conventional chest roentgenography and image intensifier photofluorography compared.

Inter- and intraobserver variation and diagnostic accuracy in estimation of heart size and pulmonary vasculature were evaluated for conventional film-screen technique and image intensifier photofluorography. Interpretation of 218 p.a. and lateral chest films by both imaging techniques was performed independently by 4 readers. Heart size relative to body surface area measured from the plain chest films was used as the reference in cardiac size determination. Overall diagnostic accuracies of conventional radiography and image intensifier photofluorography for cardiomegaly were close to each other, 0.70 vs 0.68, respectively. Specificity of film-screen radiography was better than that of photofluorography (0.92 vs 0.84, p less than 0.05). Interobserver agreement was poor both in assessment of the heart size and pulmonary vasculature (range of kappa coefficients 0.18-0.59) while the intraobserver consistency (kappa coefficients 0.60-0.85) was good to excellent. The results suggest a limited usefulness of visual assessment of heart size and pulmonary vasculature in chest roentgenographs.     

Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.

The dose to active bone marrow resulting from anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) chest examinations was estimated using an Alderson Rando phantom and extruded lithium fluoride dosimeters. The AP projections resulted in a mean marrow dose range of 1.9-2.6 mrad (0.019-0.026 mGy) as compared to doses for PA projections of 3.4-3.8 mrad (0.034-0.038 mGy) for optimally diagnostic exposure taken at 70, 90, and 120 kVp.     

Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations

In diagnostic radiology increasing attention has been focused on dose reduction while maintaining a clinically good image quality. With the use of digital detectors balancing dose vs image quality is done differently than in film-screen radiography, since dose and image brightness are uncoupled in digital imaging. In this study a new direct digital detector (flat-panel detector) was used in a dose-image optimisation of a simulated pelvic examination. X-ray images were taken with a direct digital detector (DDD), of the pelvic of a phantom using varying tube current (varying stochastic noise). The entrance surface dose was measured for each image. These images were scored by two radiologists according to EU guidelines. A dose comparison was made with an older PCR system (storage phosphor plates). With decreasing tube current the noise in the images increased and the image with the lowest dose and still acceptable image quality was identified. The results showed that the entrance surface dose using the DDD decreased from 1.4 mGy (PCR value) to 0.48 mGy (DDD standard settings). Through the optimisation the dose could be further decreased to 0.24 mGy while still maintaining an acceptable image quality. A substantial dose reduction was obtained with this new direct digital detector. This simple but efficient optimisation approach is easily applicable to other examinations and both DDD and storage phosphor plate detectors.     

Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system

PURPOSE: To compare the quality and radiation dose of a conventional film-screen system and a digital system with amorphous selenium detectors in the study of the chest, by verifying overall performance and exposure levels for the main chest structures in patients of different sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analogic system (Chest-Changer, Dupont, Day-light model 1000) and a digital system (Directray Rad 1000C, Hologic) were tested on a total of 1000 patients randomly assigned to one of two groups of 500 subjects. The patients were further subdivided according to BMI (Body Mass Index). Image quality was determined by two chest radiologists who evaluated eight anatomical structures. The entrance surface dose (skin-dose), calculated based on the exposure parameters, was taken as the patient dose. RESULTS: Mean dose delivered was very similar for both techniques in the PA view (0.28 mGy), but it was greater in the LL projections obtained with the digital system (1.20 mGy versus 0.83 mGy). The highest overall scores were assigned to 43% and 23.2% analogic radiograms and 64% and 70.2% digital radiograms, for the PA and LL projections respectively. The scores assigned to the various anatomical structures confirmed the better performance of the digital system in almost all of the regions considered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean quality of radiograms is definitely higher with the digital system, in particular in the LL projections, where the higher patient doses are counterbalanced by fewer repeated scans. The greater level of exposure in the digital system appears nonetheless tolerable on account of the greater informativeness and therefore diagnostic gain and also considering the possibilities for improving the system.     

A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality]

In a report of a nationwide survey on radiographic conditions of chest radiography in Japan, it was pointed out that the average entrance surface dose (ESD) of the computed radiography (CR) system was higher than that of the film-screen system. It seemed important that an objective index and criteria be established for dose reduction without a loss of image quality that would interfere with diagnostic observation. For this purpose, we investigated the properties of root of mean square (RMS) granularity, since it is a dominant factor in CR image quality and strongly depends on dose. The results indicated that RMS granularity showed little dependence on tube voltage when relative exposure was kept constant and that it decreased with the increment of exposure and approached a finite minimum value in a very high exposure region. For the most frequently used radiographic conditions in Japan (120 kV, 2.5 mmAl, 200 cm SID, 10: 1 grid), the decrement in RMS granularity from 6 to 16 mAs was 0.0276 to 0.0253 (9.1%). This finding suggested that exposure exceeding 6 mAs did not improve image quality, i.e., exposure reduction down to 6 mAs would not cause a significant loss of image quality. It was therefore concluded that RMS granularity was a useful objective index by which to determine the upper limit of exposure. Use of the most frequent conditions with 6 mAs seemed to be recommendable as an initial condition for the technical optimization of CR chest radiography, since ESD under this condition was 0.265 mGy, which was approximately equal to the value of the ESD distribution of a total chest radiogram in Japan.     

Digital radiography of the spine, large bones and joints using stimulable phosphor. Early clinical experience

The value of digital radiography in musculoskeletal disorders was investigated by assessing its ability to depict anatomic structures and common radiologic features as compared with the conventional film-screen combination. The digital image that was frequency modified was superior to conventional films in delineating soft tissue structures and for areas with large attenuation differences. The conventional film-screen system was superior in depicting small anatomic structures and in identifying the zone close to prostheses. This was explained by the high spatial resolution of the conventional film system and the disturbing halo effect around the prosthesis seen with digital images. The halo effect is an overshoot caused by the unsharp masking operator, which was in this series not changed for individual examinations. The exposure (radiation dose) could be reduced to 50 per cent using the digital system, without any loss of information.     

我国X射线摄影程序受检者入射体表剂量调查结果与分析

目的 通过调查全国15个省市不同级别医疗机构使用数字和屏片设备开展X射线摄影时受检者的入射体表剂量（ESD）,为制定适合我国国民体质特征的X射线摄影诊断参考水平提供数据。方法 按照《医用辐射危害评价与控制技术研究》实施方案的要求,选择年龄在20~70岁的受检者,男性体重在55~80 kg,女性体重在50~70 kg;采用热释光探测器（TLD）测量不同X射线摄影程序中成人受检者ESD,每台设备同一体位患者应不少于10名受检者;测量部位包含头颅、胸部的后前位（PA）和侧位（LAT）,腹部、骨盆、腰椎、胸椎的前后位（AP）和腰椎、胸椎的LAT等。结果 共在全国15个省的342家医院调查了19 975例X射线摄影受检者,1 813台不同类型X射线摄影设备,包括屏片X射线摄影、计算机X射线摄影（CR）和直接数字化X射线摄影（DR）设备,对于这3种类型的设备,不同摄影体位时受检者ESD的平均值分别为头颅PA：1.75、1.90、1.15 mGy;头颅LAT：1.69、1.46、1.03 mGy;胸部PA：0.75、0.65、0.36 mGy;胸部LAT：1.81、1.26、0.88 mGy;腹部AP：4.37、3.77、2.15 mGy;骨盆AP：3.73、3.56、2.75 mGy;腰椎AP：5.49、5.84、4.17 mGy;腰椎LAT：12.01、9.37、6.82 mGy;胸椎AP：4.53、3.65、2.49 mGy;胸椎LAT：6.91、6.43、4.15 mGy。结论 不同照射部位X射线摄影致受检者ESD有较大的差异。DR设备致受检者的ESD均低于屏片设备;除胸椎AP外,DR设备致受检者ESD均低于CR设备。在所有检查部位中,CR和屏片设备所致受检者ESD的差异均无统计学意义。     

Image-intensifier photofluorography and conventional chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic efficacy

Photofluorography with a large image intensifier, which provides an image field of 40 x 40 cm, reduces both the radiation dose and the imaging costs in chest radiography as compared with the film-screen technique. The two techniques were evaluated in a clinical study of 135 patients with suspected chest abnormalities. Photofluorographs and film-screen chest radiographs were interpreted independently by three radiologists. The diagnoses were confirmed by CT, follow-up radiographs, and clinical records. Among the 135 patients, 75 had primary lung cancer, 39 had pulmonary nodules, 52 had hilar or mediastinal abnormalities, 17 had pleural fluid, and 45 had pneumonic or atelectatic changes. Twenty-three normal subjects were included. Differences in diagnostic accuracy, measured by sensitivity and specificity, were not statistically significant. A larger number of true-positive cases (65%) with peripheral lung nodules were found by photofluorography than by film-screen radiography (54%) (p less than .05). The results suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of chest images made by photofluorography is sufficient to warrant using it instead of the film-screen technique in routine chest radiography, especially to detect lung tumors and metastases.     

Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: To compare the radiation doses received by patients during bedside chest radiography when a computed radiography system was used and when a 400-speed screen-film system was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed whereby all patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit were randomly assigned at admission to have all radiographic chest images obtained with either computed or conventional screen-film radiography. Doses were measured for 1 year, during which 269 patients underwent imaging. For these patients, surface entry doses were measured by means of individual thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the skin at the center of the radiation beam. In addition, data were collected relating to the patient and examination characteristics, as well as to repeat examinations. Effective doses were calculated. RESULTS: The patients in the two arms of the study were well matched. The surface entry doses were higher in the computed radiography group (median, 0.21 mGy for computed radiography and 0.16 mGy for conventional radiography), and the effective doses were also higher (median, 0.036 mSv for computed radiography and 0.027 mSv for conventional radiography). Fewer examinations were repeated when computed radiography was used. CONCLUSION: When computed radiography was used, patient doses increased. The speed of this computed radiography system, which uses phosphor plate imaging, equates approximately to a 300-speed screen-film system.     

Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality

Council Directive 97/43/Euratom (Medical Exposure Directive) states that member States of the European Union shall promote the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for radio-diagnostic examinations. Dose surveys can form the basis for the establishment of diagnostic reference levels. In view of the implementation of the Medical Exposure Directive in the Netherlands, a survey of dose and image quality has been performed for posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography in 2001. In this survey, 25 participants were selected from a list of 175 Dutch hospitals, whereas in a previous PA chest survey (about 10 years ago) participation was voluntary and participants came predominantly from the south-western part of the Netherlands. For conventional screen-film PA chest radiography, the present results for patient dose and image quality are quite similar to those results from the previous survey. The fraction of conventional X-ray systems utilizing lung compensation filters has remained approximately the same. For dedicated digital chest radiography systems, image quality is better than for conventional systems, but doses vary and can assume relatively high values. The results indicate that there are still possibilities for dose reduction, without loss of image quality. The 75 percentile value of the entrance surface dose distribution is approximately 0.13 mGy.