Selectivity of ligand binding to opioid receptors in brain membranes from the rat, monkey and guinea pig

Conditions for the equilibrium binding to opioid receptor of [3H]sufentanil (mu selective), [3H][D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (delta selective), and [3H]U69,593 (kappa selective) were established in membranes from rat brain cerebrum, monkey cortex, or guinea pig cerebellum. The selectivity index of various opioid alkaloids and peptides in binding to the mu, delta, or kappa opioid receptors was expressed as the ratio of their EC50 values in displacing two selective radiolabeled ligands: [3H]sufentanil/[3H](D-Pen2,D-Pen5)enkephalin (selectivity: mu/delta), [3H]sufentanil/[3H]U69,593 (selectivity: mu/kappa), or [3H][D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin/[3H]U69,593 (selectivity: delta/kappa). High resolution in binding selectivity was observed: in rat brain the mu/delta selectivity for Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(Me)Phe-Gly-ol and sufentanil were 0.02 and 0.03, whereas for [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin and ICI 174,864 they were 1,200 and 998. Compared to mu opiates, the specific binding of delta and kappa agonists was less sensitive to sodium. The results describe a routinely applicable methodological approach for the assessment of selective ligand binding to the mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in rodent and monkey brain membranes.     

Affinity labeling of mu opioid receptors by sulfhydryl alkylating derivatives of morphine and morphinone.

After reduction of a disulfide bond at or near the mu opioid binding site in rat brain membranes, incubating membranes with 14 beta-bromoacetamido derivatives of either morphine, dihydromorphine, morphinone, or dihydromorphinone resulted in the irreversible inhibition of mu opioid binding to rat brain membranes. Without the addition of the disulfide bond-reducing reagent dithiothreitol, these affinity ligands bound reversibly to opioid binding sites. Binding to either delta or kappa opioid binding sites was not altered by alkylation of the membranes with the affinity ligands. The percentage of irreversible inhibition of mu opioid binding was dependent on the time and temperature of the incubation of membranes with the affinity ligands and on the concentrations of dithiothreitol and the affinity ligands. Incubating membranes with morphine afforded almost complete protection from alkylation of the mu opioid binding site. Naloxone and the l-isomer levorphanol also protected the site from alkylation, whereas the d-isomer dextrorphan and the kappa-selective opioid U50,488H did not protect the site. The mu-selective peptide [D-Ala2, (Me)Phe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin was the peptide that afforded the greatest protection. These studies have shown that, after the reduction of a disulfide bond at or near the mu opioid binding site, this sulfhydryl group can be specifically alkylated, resulting in the affinity labeling of the mu opioid binding site.     

Relaxant effect of the H2-receptor antagonist oxmetidine on guinea-pig and human airways.

The effects of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor agonists were examined on evoked field potentials in brain slices prepared from rat hippocampus. The effects of the mu-selective opioid peptide [D-Ala2, NMe-Phe4, Met(O)5ol]enkephalin (FK 33-824) and the delta-selective peptide [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) were qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Both increased the amplitude of evoked population spike responses when perfused in low nanomolar concentrations in a fashion consistent with what has been previously reported for other opiate agonists such as morphine. The kappa-selective agonists bremazocine and U-50, 488H were without effect upon evoked responses at concentrations as high as 10 microM. Bremazocine, but not U-50, 488H, proved to be an extremely potent antagonist of responses to both mu- and delta- selective agonists. Moreover, bremazocine was considerably more potent in antagonizing responses to FK 33-824 than DPDPE, which supports the hypothesis that FK 33-824 and DPDPE act via different receptors. Thus, although bremazocine is an agonist at kappa receptors, it appears to act as an antagonist at other opioid receptor sites.     

Opioid Receptors and Signaling on Cells from the Immune System

This review discusses the criteria for determining whether a binding site or functional response is directly mediated by either the mu, delta, or kappa opioid receptors. In 1988, Sibinga and Goldstein published the first review that addressed whether cells from the immune system express opioid receptors. The criteria that they used, namely, structure–activity relationships, stereoselectivity, dose- and concentration-dependence, and saturability are still relevant criteria today for determining if an immunological response is mediated by either the mu, delta or kappa opioid receptors. Radioligand receptor binding studies and functional studies that clearly show the presence of an opioid receptor on immunocytes are presented. Selective agonists and antagonists for the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors are discussed, and the need for their use in experiments is emphasized. Conditions used in functional assays are very important. Receptor desensitization and downregulation occur within minutes after the application of an agonist. However, many immunological assays are applying an agonist for days before measuring an immunological effect. The results obtained may reflect changes that are results of receptor desensitization and/or downregulation instead of changes that are observed with acute activation of the receptor. The future of receptor pharmacology lies in the crosstalk and dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors. In transfected systems, opioid receptors have been shown to dimerize with chemokine and cannabinoid receptors, resulting in crosstalk between different types of receptors.     

Mu, but not kappa, opioid agonists induce contractions of the canine small intestine ex vivo

The proposed kappa opioid receptor agonists ethylketocyclazocine (EK), nalorphine, bremazocine and U-50,488H were evaluated for their ability to produce contractions of isolated, vascularly perfused canine small intestinal segments. Responses to these agonists were compared to those of morphine and phenazocine, a mu benzomorphan. Morphine (0.04-25 micrograms) and phenazocine (0.01-3.0 micrograms) both produced naloxone-reversible contractions, suggesting that the responses were mediated largely by mu opioid receptors. In contrast, the proposed kappa agonists were ineffective in producing intestinal stimulation, with only EK (1-100 micrograms) showing minimal but significant activity at very high doses. We suggest that the effects of EK may be mediated through mu opioid receptors and that kappa receptors appear not to be involved in the contractile response of the dog small intestine to opioids.     

Multiple agonist-affinity states of opioid receptors: regulation of binding by guanyl nucleotides in guinea pig cortical, NG108-15, and 7315c cell membranes

Multiple affinity states of opioid receptors of the mu and delta types have been identified in membranes prepared from cells which bear only one type of opioid receptor (mu receptors in 7315c cells, delta receptors in NG 108-15 cells), and in guinea pig cortical membranes where both types of receptors were present in the membrane preparations. States of mu and delta receptors which have agonist affinities too low to be identified by radiolabeled agonist have been measured indirectly by agonist competition for sites labeled by radioactive antagonist. Using analogues of guanyl nucleotides, we have examined the competition of the mu and delta agonists DAGO and DSLET against [3H]DIP or [3H]NAL binding to opioid receptors and identified several agonist affinity states. In the absence of added nucleotide, competition of DSLET for [3H]DIP binding to delta opioid receptors revealed the presence of two binding sites with differing apparent agonist affinities. Addition of GDP beta S produced a steep monophasic curve which was best fit by a one-site model. In contrast, in the presence of added GTP or GTP gamma S, two affinity states were again apparent for DSLET competition at the delta receptor. The competition curve with GTP was shifted to the right relative to that produced in the absence of added guanyl nucleotide, indicating the presence of a lower apparent affinity state than any observed under other treatment conditions. DAGO competed against [3H]DIP or [3H]NAL binding to mu receptors over a wide concentration range in the absence of added guanyl nucleotide, consistent with the occupation by this ligand of more than one agonist affinity state of the mu receptor. However, when GDP beta S was added to the incubation mixture, only a single binding site was identified. Two mu receptor affinity states were again observed in the presence of added GTP or GTP gamma S. One of these had significantly lower apparent affinity than those states detected in the absence of added nucleotide or with GDP beta S. Pertussis toxin treatment resulted in a monophasic agonist competition curve which was best fitted by a single-site model in both 7315c and NG108-15 cell membranes. Addition of 100 microM GTP did not affect the agonist Kapp or Bmax after pertussis toxin treatment, suggesting that sites labeled under these conditions were not functionally associated with a G protein. In general, the effects of guanyl nucleotides were qualitatively similar at mu and delta receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Studies on the pharmacology of central opioid-induced increases in plasma catecholamines in conscious rats

Centrally-administered opioid peptides produce elevations in levels of catecholamines in plasma in conscious rats. To investigate the opioid receptor involved in mediating this response, morphine (3.5-105 nmol), [D-Ala2-D-Leu5]enkephalin (DADL, 1.05-35 nmol) and U50, 488H (35-1160 nmol), relatively selective ligands for the mu, delta and kappa receptors respectively, were injected intracerebroventricularly into conscious rats and the levels of catecholamines in plasma determined at the peak of the response. Each agonist produced dose-dependent elevations in levels of noradrenaline and adrenaline, the order of potency being DADL approximately equal to morphine greater than U50,488H. These results exclude involvement of the kappa receptor but do not distinguish between an effect mediated by a mu or delta receptor. The responses to morphine were blocked in the presence of 300 nmol naloxone but were not altered by 41.5 nmol RX 781094, a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist. The elevation in levels of adrenaline in plasma produced by small doses of the agonists was not related to behavioural changes.     

Differential cross-tolerance to mu and kappa opioid agonists in morphine-tolerant rats responding under a schedule of food presentation

If different populations of opioid receptors mediate the actions of mu and kappa opioid agonists, then tolerance induced by the chronic administration of a mu agonist should confer cross-tolerance to other mu agonists but not necessarily to those compounds whose effects are mediated by the kappa receptor. This hypothesis was evaluated in the present investigation by examining the effects of the mu agonists morphine,l-methadone and fentanyl, the kappa agonists U50,488 and bremazocine, and the mixed kappa/mu agonist ethylketocyclazocine in rats responding under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food presentation before, during and after exposure to a regimen of chronic morphine administration. For comparison, naloxone was evaluated as a representative mu antagonist and the phenothiazine chlorpromazine as a control drug. During all phases of the experiment, each of these compounds produced dose-related decreases in rate of responding. During the daily administration of 40 mg/kg morphine, tolerance developed to the rate-decreasing effects of morphine,l-methadone and fentanyl, and an enhanced sensitivity to the effects of naloxone. In contrast to the effects obtained with these mu opioids, there was no evidence that chronic morphine administration produced tolerance or enhanced sensitivity to the rate-decreasing effects of U50,488, bremazocine, ethylketocyclazocine and chlorpromazine. The present findings demonstrate that the chronic administration of morphine results in the selective development of tolerance to other mu agonists. In addition, the lack of cross-tolerance between morphine and the kappa agonists examined demonstrate that this behavioral preparation is a useful tool for differentiating the effects of compounds acting at different opioid receptor types.     

Ethylketocyclazocine and bremazocine analgesia in neonatal rats

In three experiments we examined the analgesic potency of kappa opioid receptor agonists in 2- and 16-day-old rats. Ethylketocyclazocine (1–50 mg/kg) produced similar dose- and time-dependent increases in the latency to retract a hind paw from a noxious thermal stimulus in rats of both ages. Bremazocine (0.001–10 mg/kg), a kappa agonist with reported antagonist activity at mu receptors, was also effective in producing analgesia in 2-day-old rats. The dose-effect relationship for bremazocine was nonmonotonic. Bremazocine analgesia (0.1 mg/kg) was reversed by both naltrexone and MR2266, a putative kappa opioid antagonist. These results are discussed in terms of the functional integrity of a kappa analgesic system in the developing rat.     

Protection by opioid ligands against modification of the opioid receptor by a carbodiimide.

Opioid receptors in membranes prepared from guinea-pig cerebellum were modified irreversibly by treatment with a water soluble carbodiimide, 1-ethyl,3-(3-dimethylaminoethyl)carbodiimide (EDAC). This decreased the number of [3H]bremazocine binding sites (Bmax reduced from 140 to 100 fmol/mg by 1 mM EDAC) without changing their affinity. When the EDAC concentration used was sufficient (500 mM) to inactivate almost all of the opioid receptors, the modification was partly prevented by inclusion of high concentrations (100 microM) of opioid agonists ([D-Ala2, MePhe4, Glyol5]-enkephalin, [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]-enkephalin,(+)-trans-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)- cyclohexyl]benzo(b)thiophene-4-acetamide hydrochloride), although they exhibited equal efficacy irrespective of their mu, delta or kappa type selectivity. However, almost all of the opioid binding sites were protected when a guanine nucleotide analogue (GppNHP, 100 microM) was also included with the agonists during carbodiimide treatment.     

Site-directed alkylation of multiple opioid receptors. I. Binding selectivity

We report a method for measuring and expressing the binding selectivity of ligands for mu, delta, and kappa opioid binding sites. We used radioligands that are partially selective for these sites in combination with membrane preparations enriched in each site. Enrichment was obtained by treatment of membranes with the alkylating agent beta-chlornaltrexamine in the presence of appropriate protecting ligands, sufentanil for mu sites, [D-Ala2, D-Leu5] enkephalin for delta sites, and dynorphin A for kappa sites. After enrichment for mu receptors, [3H] dihydromorphine bound to a single type of site as judged by the slope of competition binding curves. After enrichment for delta or kappa receptors, binding sites for [3H] [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin and [3H]ethylketocyclazocine, respectively, were still not homogeneous. There were residual mu sites in delta-enriched membranes but we found no evidence for residual mu or delta sites in kappa-enriched membranes. We used this method to identify ligands that are highly selective for each of the three types of sites: Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(Me)Phe-Gly-ol, sufentanil, and morphiceptin for mu sites; (D- Pen2 , D- Pen5 ]enkephalin and [D- Pen2 ,L- Pen5 ]enkephalin for delta sites; and tifluadom and U50 ,488 for kappa sites.     

BU74, a complex oripavine derivative with potent kappa opioid receptor agonism and delayed opioid antagonism

In the search for opioid agonists with delayed antagonist actions as potential treatments for substance abuse, the bridged morphinan BU74 (17-cyclopropylmethyl-3-hydroxy-[5beta,7beta,3',5']-pyrrolidino-2'[S]-phenyl-7alpha-methyl-6,14-endoetheno morphinan) (3f) was synthesized. In isolated tissue and [35S]GTPgammaS opioid receptor functional assays BU74 was shown to be a potent long-lasting kappa opioid receptor agonist, delta opioid receptor partial agonist and mu opioid receptor antagonist. In antinociceptive tests in the mouse, BU74 showed high efficacy and potent kappa opioid receptor agonism. When its agonist action had waned BU74 became an antagonist of kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists in the tail flick assay and of delta, kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists in the acetic acid writhing assay. The slow onset, long-duration kappa opioid receptor agonist effects of BU74 suggests that it could be a lead compound for the discovery of a treatment for cocaine abuse.     

Delta opioid-like discriminative stimulus effects of mu opioids in pigeons discriminating the delta opioid BW373U86 from saline

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the substitution patterns produced by opioids with activity at the mu receptor in pigeons trained to discriminate the delta opioid BW373U86 from saline. A low dose of naltrindole (0.1 mg/kg) produced at least a 16-fold rightward shift in the dose-effect curve for the stimulus effects of BW373U86 (yielding a pK(B) = 7.9), whereas a relatively high dose of naloxone (1.0 mg/kg) produced only a 2-fold rightward shift (yielding a pK(B) = 5.6). The delta opioid SNC80 and the mixed mu/kappa opioids ethylketocyclazocine and ketocyclazocine substituted completely for the BW373U86 stimulus. Various opioids with activity at the mu receptor (levallorphan, [-]-cyclazocine, [-]-n-allylnormetazocine, morphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, [+]-propoxyphene, etorphine, fentanyl) substituted partially for the BW373U86 stimulus. There was no relationship between the substitution patterns produced by these opioids and their relative intrinsic efficacy at the mu receptor, their relative selectivity for the mu receptor or their relative affinity for the delta receptor. Naloxone (1.0 mg/kg) was considerably more effective than naltrindole (0.1 mg/kg) in antagonizing the substitution patterns produced by etorphine, ethylketocyclazocine, ketocyclazocine and butorphanol, suggesting that these effects were not mediated by activity at the delta receptor. There was no evidence that these opioids antagonized the BW373U86 stimulus, suggesting that they were not functioning as low efficacy agonists at the delta receptor. The kappa opioids bremazocine and U50,488, as well as the non-opioids cocaine and pentobarbital, failed to produce appreciable levels of BW373U86 responding. The present findings indicate that in pigeons mu opioids most likely produce delta-like discriminative stimulus effects by activation of mu rather than delta or kappa receptors.     

Synthesis and opioid receptor affinity of morphinan and benzomorphan derivatives: mixed kappa agonists and mu agonists/antagonists as potential pharmacotherapeutics for cocaine dependence

This report concerns the synthesis and preliminary pharmacological evaluation of a novel series of kappa agonists related to the morphinan (-)-cyclorphan (3a) and the benzomorphan (-)-cyclazocine (2) as potential agents for the pharmacotherapy of cocaine abuse. Recent evidence suggests that agonists acting at kappa opioid receptors may modulate the activity of dopaminergic neurons and alter the neurochemical and behavioral effects of cocaine. We describe the synthesis and chemical characterization of a series of morphinans 3a-c, structural analogues of cyclorphan [(-)-3-hydroxy-N-cyclopropylmethylmorphinan S(+)-mandelate, 3a], the 10-ketomorphinans 4a,b, and the 8-ketobenzomorphan 1b. Binding experiments demonstrated that the cyclobutyl analogue 3b [(-)-3-hydroxy-N-cyclobutylmethylmorphinan S(+)-mandelate, 3b, MCL-101] of cyclorphan (3a) had a high affinity for mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in guinea pig brain membranes. Both 3a,b were approximately 2-fold more selective for the kappa receptor than for the mu receptor. However 3b (the cyclobutyl analogue) was 18-fold more selective for the kappa receptor in comparison to the delta receptor, while cyclorphan (3a) had only 4-fold greater affinity for the kappa receptor in comparison to the delta receptor. These findings were confirmed in the antinociceptive tests (tail-flick and acetic acid writhing) in mice, which demonstrated that cyclorphan (3a) produced antinociception that was mediated by the delta receptor while 3b did not produce agonist or antagonist effects at the delta receptor. Both 3a,b had comparable kappa agonist properties. 3a,b had opposing effects at the mu receptor: 3b was a mu agonist whereas 3a was a mu antagonist.     

Author index to volume 130

Using the delta-enriched mouse vas deferens and the kappa-enriched guinea-pig ileal longitudinal muscle preparations, a large variety of so-called 'mu, kappa, delta and sigma' opioid agonists were tested for their mu, kappa and delta properties. Buprenorphine and U50,488H appeared to be the most highly selective agonists for mu and kappa opioid receptors, respectively. Most ligands identified as specific agonists are in fact only selective and appear to interact at more than one receptor type.     

A study of the interaction of the alkylating agent, NIH10236, with opioid receptors in vitro and in vivo

The series of experiments reported in this paper examined the spectrum of subtypes of opioid receptors alkylated in vitro by N-cyclopropylmethyl-7 alpha-methylfumaramido-6,14- endoethenotetrahydronororipavine (NIH10236) and four optical isomers of the methylfumaramidophenethyl derivatives of 3-methylfentanyl. Pretreatment of membranes with NIH10236 resulted in a wash-resistant inhibition of the binding of [3H]6 beta-fluoro-6-desoxyoxymorphone (mu binding sites), the binding of [3H][D-ala2,D-leu5]-enkephalin (both the higher and lower affinity delta binding sites) and was without effect on kappa binding sites labelled with [3H]bremazocine. All four potential alkylating derivatives of 3-methylfentanyl were inactive. Pretreatment of membranes with 1 microM of the reversible ligands, (+)-cis-3-methylfentanyl, but not its enantiomer, inhibited the binding of [3H]6 beta-fluoro-6-desoxyoxymorphone and the binding of [3H][D-ala2,D-leu5]enkephalin to the lower affinity binding sites by over 90%. This phenomenon is termed "pseudo-irreversible inhibition." Incubation of pretreated membranes for 60 min at 37 degrees C, in the presence of 200 mM NaCl and 50 microM GppNHp, only partially reversed the masking of opioid receptors by (+)-cis-3-methylfentanyl. For in vivo experiments, membranes were prepared 18-24 hr after the intracerebroventricular administration of 80 and 50 micrograms of NIH10236. This resulted in decreased labelling of mu binding sites, lower affinity [3H][D-ala2,D-leu5]enkephalin binding sites, as well as kappa binding sites, labelled by [3H]U69,593 and [3H]bremazocine. There was no apparent alteration in the higher affinity [3H][D-ala2,D-leu5]enkephalin binding site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interactions between mu and kappa opioid agonists in the rat drug discrimination procedure

The present study was designed to explore the nature of the interaction between mu and kappa opioid agonists in the rat drug discrimination procedure. In rats trained to discriminate the kappa agonist U50,488 (5.6 mg/kg) from water, the other kappa agonist bremazocine substituted completely for the U50,488 training stimulus, and the additional kappa agonist tifluadom substituted in three of five of rats tested. In contrast, the mu agonists morphine, fentanyl, and buprenorphine produced primarily vehicle-appropriate responding. When morphine, fentanyl, and buprenorphine were combined with the training dose of U50,488, all three mu agonists reduced U50,488-appropriate responding. In rats trained to discriminate the mu agonist morphine (10.0 mg/kg) from saline, the other mu agonists morphine and buprenorphine all substituted in a dose-dependent manner for the morphine training stimulus, whereas U50,488, bremazocine, and tifluadom produced primarily vehicle-appropriate responding. When combined with the training dose of morphine, bremazocine antagonized morphine's discriminative stimulus effects, whereas U50,488 and tifluadom had no effect. The barbiturate pentobarbital neither substituted for, nor antagonized, the discriminative stimulus effects of either U50,488 or morphine. These results suggest that mu agonists and kappa agonists produce interacting effects in the drug discrimination procedure in rats.     

Role of delta opioid efficacy as a determinant of mu/delta opioid interactions in rhesus monkeys

Delta opioid agonists can selectively enhance the antinociceptive effects of mu opioid agonists without enhancing some other, potentially undesirable mu agonist effects. However, the degree of delta receptor efficacy required to produce this profile of interactions is unknown. To address this issue, the present study examined interactions produced by the mu agonist fentanyl and the intermediate-efficacy delta opioid MSF61 in rhesus monkeys. For comparison, interactions were also examined between fentanyl and the relatively high-efficacy delta agonist SNC243A and the delta antagonist naltrindole, which has negligible efficacy at delta receptors. Two different behavioral procedures were used: (a) a warm-water tail-withdrawal assay of thermal nociception, and (b) an assay of schedule-controlled responding for food reinforcement. Drug interactions within each procedure were evaluated using dose-addition analysis to compare experimental results with expected additivity. Drug interactions across procedures were evaluated using dose-ratio analysis to assess relative potencies to produce antinociception vs. response-rate suppression. As expected, dose-addition analysis found that fentanyl/SNC243A interactions were superadditive in the assay of antinociception but additive in the assay of schedule-controlled responding. Conversely, fentanyl/MSF61 interactions were generally additive in both procedures, and fentanyl/naltrindole interactions were additive or subadditive in both procedures. Dose-ratio analysis found that fentanyl alone produced antinociception and rate suppression with similar potencies. Some fentanyl/SNC243A mixtures produced antinociception with up to 4-fold greater potency than rate-suppression. However, fentanyl/MSF61 and fentanyl/naltrindole mixtures produced antinociception with lower potency than rate suppression. These results suggest that relatively high delta receptor efficacy is required for mu/delta antinociceptive synergy.     

Solubilization and characterization of the kappa-opioid receptor type from guinea-pig cerebellum

The kappa-opioid receptor (kappa Op) from guinea-pig cerebellum membranes has been solubilized in an active form and in good yield (30-40%) with digitonin in 10 mM Tes-KOH buffer, pH 7.4. [3H]Bremazocine (KD = 1.1 nM in the soluble extract) was used to monitor the binding and hydrodynamic characteristics of the digitonin-solubilized receptor, s-kappa Op. Opioid agonists and antagonists bind s-kappa Op with a generally lower (yet still high) apparent affinity than they do its membrane-bound counterpart, m-kappa Op, but with the same rank order of potency. In particular, U50488, a kappa selective agonist, binds s-kappa Op with a considerably higher apparent affinity than do [D-Ala2, MePhe4, Glyol5]enkephalin, a mu selective agonist, and [D-Thr2,Leu5]enkephalyl-Thr, a delta selective agonist. s-kappa Op has also retained substantial stereospecificity since levorphanol was nearly 200-fold as potent as dextrorphan in competing with binding of [3H]bremazocine in the soluble extract. However, s-kappa Op appeared to be desensitized to regulation by Na+ ions: the selective inhibition by the allosteric effector of binding of agonists at the m-kappa Op was no longer observed in digitonin extracts from guinea-pig cerebellum membranes. The s-kappa Op behaved as a unique macromolecular entity both in molecular exclusion chromatography (appr. rs = 6.7 nm) and in sedimentation on linear density gradients (app. S20,w = 11.8 S).     

OPIOID RECEPTOR SIGNALLING MECHANISMS

1. Three pharmacological types of opioid receptors, mu, delta and kappa, and their corresponding genes have been identified. Although other types of opioid receptors have been suggested, their existence has not been established unequivocally. A fourth opioid receptor, ORL1, which is genetically closely related to the others, has also been isolated. ORL1 responds to the endogenous agonist nociceptin (orphanin FQ) and displays a pharmacological profile that differs greatly from mu, delta and kappa receptors. 2. All opioid receptors mediate many of their cellular effects via activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins. The mu, delta and kappa receptors are all capable of interacting with the pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein alpha-subunits Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, Go1, Go2 and the pertussis toxin-insensitive Gz and G16. None of the opioid receptors interacts substantially with Gs and mu receptors do not activate Gq, G11, G12, G13, or G14. 3. Differential coupling of different opioid receptors to most types of G-proteins is marginal. The mu, delta and kappa receptors appear to preferentially activate Go and Gi2 over other pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins, although there is evidence that mu receptors show some preference for Gi3. delta Receptors couple more efficiently to G16 than do mu or kappa receptors. 4. There is some evidence that opioid receptors, particularly mu and ORL1 receptors, can also couple to cellular effectors in a G-protein-independent manner. 5. In general, the consequences of activation of any of the opioid receptors in a given cell type depend more on the profile (stoichiometry) of the G-proteins and effectors expressed than on the type of opioid receptor present in the cell. Notions that different types of opioid receptors intrinsically couple preferentially to one type of effector rather than another should, therefore, be discarded.