Randomized, multicenter trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin administered either via hepatic arterial or intravenous infusion versus fluorodeoxyuridine administered via hepatic arterial infusion in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of three treatments for patients with documented adenocarcinoma of the colon and/or rectum who have undergone complete resection of primary tumor and have nonresectable liver metastases that do not exceed 75% of the liver volume. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 168 patients at 25 treatment centers were enrolled onto this prospective, multicenter, randomized study. The three treatment arms were as follows: (1) fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), (2) 5-FU/LV administered via intravenous (IV) infusion, and (3) fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) administered via HAI. RESULTS: Median times to disease progression for the three treatment arms were as follows: 9.2 months for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, 6.6 months for IV 5-FU/LV, and 5.9 months for HAI FUDR. Median survival times for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, IV 5-FU/LV, and HAI FUDR were 18.7 months, 17.6 months, and 12.7 months, respectively. There was a nearly two-fold increase in time to progression in addition to a survival benefit among patients with an intrahepatic tumor burden of less than 25% who were treated with HAI 5-FU/LV. The most common adverse events were stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, skin irritation, diarrhea, and elevated serum levels of liver enzymes. Some patients exhibited severe reactions, including biliary sclerosis and chemical hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Although the use of HAI 5-FU/LV as a means of treating liver metastases after resection of colorectal carcinoma warrants further investigation, it cannot be recommended as a routine therapeutic measure at this time.     

Hepatic arterial infusion of low-dose leucovorin/5-FU chemotherapy for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally indicated to patients without extrahepatic lesions. This study was performed to examine whether or not it was possible to obtain a comparable survival time, response rate (RR) and modest toxicity combining low-dose LV and 5-FU (LV/5-FU) with HAI for the patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC. Twenty two patients with unresectable multiple liver metastases were enrolled in the study. These were patients who had been admitted from 1994 to 2003 in our hospital. Patients were given LV at 25 mg/body immediately followed by 5-FU at 500 mg/body as a 2-hour HAI daily for 5 consecutive days every 5 weeks. The median survival time (MST) of HAI patients was 24.5 months. According to the treatment in the HAI patients, one patient was CR, 6 were PR, 9 were NC, 6 were PD, and the response rate (RR) was 31.8% (7 of 22 patients). The toxicities to this regimen on HAI were observed in 12 patients, and grades 3 or 4 were in 3 patients only. These results suggested that HAI with LV/5-FU can be useful for unresectable liver metastases from CRC.     

Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable liver disease with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) on the resection rate and survival of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable hepatic metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 1200 mg/m(2) as a continuous 48-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and response was assessed every 12 weeks (six cycles). RESULTS: The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 47.5% (n = 19), with two complete responses and disease stabilization in 11 (27.5.%) patients. Responses were unconfirmed for 11 patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were typical of the chemotherapy agents used. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients reported hematological toxicity (35.0% grade 3/4) and 14 (35.0%) reported gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5% grade 3/4). Thirteen patients (32.5%) underwent potentially curative liver resection following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was particularly effective in patients with large metastases on entry to the study. The median time to progression is 14.3 months and, at a median follow-up of 19 months, all patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan combined with 5-FU/FA enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. The effects of treatment on survival have yet to be determined.     

Retrospective comparison of two different schedules of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a single institution experience

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of weekly irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and folinic acid (FA) regimen (IFL) versus biweekly irinotecan with infusional 5-FU and FA (FOLFIRI) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatments outcome of 86 pts (IFL - 38 pts, FOLFIRI - 48 pts) was evaluated. Chemotherapy regimens were as follows: IFL - intravenous (i.v.) infusion irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) over 90 min and 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) preceded by FA 20 mg/m(2) both given by i.v. bolus injection, all repeated on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 every 6 weeks; FOLFIRI - i.v. irinotecan 180 mg/ m(2) on days 1 and 15 with subsequent FA 200 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion and i.v. bolus injection of 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU immediately followed by 22-hour i.v. infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 152 (mean - 4) IFL cycles and 328 (mean - 6) FOLFIRI cycles were administered. Average dose intensity was 0.8 and 0.78 respectively. Toxicities were mild and manageable for both regimens evaluated. Overall response rate was 36.8% in IFL arm and 44.7% in FOLFIRI arm. At the median follow-up of 16 months in IFL arm and 14 months in FOPFIRI arm the two year survival was 38% and 45%, the median survival was 18 months and 21.5 months, and the median progression free survival was 6 months and 9.4 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, both IFL and FOLFIRI regimens have acceptable toxicity at a similar level of dose intensity. Compared to IFL, FOLFIRI seems to improve progression-free survival.     

Phase II study of irinotecan plus leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil as first- or second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan as first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), followed by LV 200 mg/m(2) (i.v.) and 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) as an i.v. bolus, administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Thirty-one patients (23 chemo-na?ve, 8 chemo-exposed) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 22.6% and the disease control rate was 38.7%. Among the patients who received the regimen as first-line treatment, objective response rate was 30.4% and the disease control rate was 52.1%. However, progression of the disease was recorded in all the patients receiving the combination as second-line chemotherapy. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4 months and the median duration of survival was 7 months. The median TTP was 6 months for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and 2.5 for those who received study treatment as second line. Furthermore, the median survival duration was 8 months and 6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 toxicity was febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of 5-FU/LV and irinotecan as first-line treatment was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation would be worthwhile, particularly in elderly or debilitated patients who cannot tolerate aggressive chemotherapy.     

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.     

Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Schedules of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid in Previously Untreated Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience

Abstract

Purpose: To compare efficacy and tolerability of weekly irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and folinic acid (FA) regimen (IFL) versus biweekly irinotecan with infusional 5-FU and FA (FOLFIRI) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods: Treatments outcome of 86 pts (IFL - 38 pts, FOLFIRI - 48 pts) was evaluated. Chemotherapy regimens were as follows: IFL - intravenous (i.v.) infusion irinotecan 125 mg/m² over 90 min and 5-FU 500 mg/m² preceded by FA 20 mg/m² both given by i.v. bolus injection, all repeated on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 every 6 weeks; FOLFIRI - i.v. irinotecan 180 mg/m² on days 1 and 15 with subsequent FA 200 mg/m² administered as a 2-hour infusion and i.v. bolus injection of 400 mg/m² 5-FU immediately followed by 22-hour i.v. infusion of 600 mg/m² 5-FU on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Results: A total of 152 (mean - 4) IFL cycles and 328 (mean - 6) FOLFIRI cycles were administered. Average dose intensity was 0.8 and 0.78 respectively. Toxicities were mild and manageable for both regimens evaluated. Overall response rate was 36.8% in IFL arm and 44.7 % in FOLFIRI arm. At the median follow-up of 16 months in IFL arm and 14 months in FOPFIRI arm the two year survival was 38% and 45%, the median survival was 18 months and 21.5 months, and the median progression free survival was 6 months and 9.4 months respectively.

Conclusions: In our experience, both IFL and FOLFIRI regimens have acceptable toxicity at a similar level of dose intensity. Compared to IFL, FOLFIRI seems to improve progression-free survival.     

Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Second- and third-line treatments remain a challenge in advanced colorectal cancer. Studies of bimonthly regimens of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous infusion combined with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) have shown encouraging response rates in patients not responding to a bimonthly LV/5-FU regimen. Hyperthermic enhancement of L-OHP efficiency by increased DNA adduct formation has been demonstrated in vitro. This study was designed to address feasibility, toxicity and efficacy issues of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) as an adjunct to L-OHP/LV/5-FU in pretreated patients after progression to first- and second-line treatments with LV/5-FU by continuous infusion and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had progressed during or within 3 months after completion of chemotherapy with LV/5-FU 24-h infusion (LV/5-FU(24h)) (eight patients) or irinotecan combined with or after LV/5-FU(24h )(36 patients), were treated with L-OHP 85 mg/m(2), 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed by LV 200 mg/m(2), 1-h i.v. infusion, and 5-FU 3 g/m(2), 48-h continuous infusion. Every second cycle of the biweekly regimen was combined with WBH, thus allowing a comparison of toxicity with and without WBH in the same patient. Whole-body hyperthermia was administered by a humidified radiant heat device. The target temperature of 41.8 degrees C was maintained for 60 min. L-OHP (2-h infusion) was started at a core body temperature of 39 degrees C. RESULTS: All patients could be evaluated for toxicity, and 41 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 273 L-OHP-containing regimens were administered, 130 with and 143 without WBH. Hyperthermic treatment combined with L-OHP/LV/5-FU showed no unexpected toxicities. WHO grade 3 toxicities were rare and evenly balanced between cycles given with or without WBH. One early death occurred due to sepsis and tumor lysis. The overall response rate was 20%, with two complete and six partial responses. Twenty-three patients (56%) had stable disease and nine patients (22%) progressive disease. With a median observation time of 70 weeks, the median time to progression was 21 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-25 weeks] and the median survival was 50 weeks (95% CI 39-61 weeks) from the start of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests some advantage of combining L-OHP/LV/5-FU with WBH. Results compare favorably with the activity of similar regimens without WBH in less extensively pretreated patients. These data support further evaluation and warrant phase III studies.     

Irinotecan,oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a combination of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Twenty-six consecutive patients with ACC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated with a combination of oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] for 2 hours) on day 1, irinotecan (250 mg/m2 i.v. for 90 minutes) on day 1, and 5-FU (2600 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 i.v. in a 24-hour infusion) on day 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. Five of the patients (19.2%) had shown previous chemoresistance. One hundred sixty-two cycles were administered (median, 6; range, 3-13 cycles). All patients were evaluated for toxicity; 23 were evaluable for response. According to intention-to-treat, the overall response rate was 69.2% (18 patients; 95% CI: 48.2%-85.7%), including 3 complete remissions (11.5%). Four additional patients (15.3%) had stable disease, and only 1 (3.8%) progressed. Major toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 9 patients (34.6%), and grade 4 occurred in 1 patient (3.8%). Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 8 patients (30.7%) and grade 4 in 1 patient (3.8%). Other toxicities were mild. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 14 months. Seventeen patients (65.4%) are still alive, and the median overall survival has not been reached yet. This combination of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU/leucovorin is fairly well tolerated and shows promising activity in ACC. This treatment merits further comparison with other combination regimens.     

Phase II Study of Irinotecan plus Leucovorin and Bolus 5-Fluorouracil as First- or Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric or Esophageal-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinoma

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) / leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan as first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 80 mg/m² intravenously (i.v.), followed by LV 200 mg/m² (i.v.) and 5-FU 450 mg/m² as an i.v. bolus, administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Thirty-one patients (23 chemo-naïve, 8 chemo-exposed) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 22.6% and the disease control rate was 38.7%. Among the patients who received the regimen as first-line treatment, objective response rate was 30.4% and the disease control rate was 52.1%. However, progression of the disease was recorded in all the patients receiving the combination as second-line chemotherapy. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4 months and the median duration of survival was 7 months. The median TTP was 6 months for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and 2.5 for those who received study treatment as second line. Furthermore, the median survival duration was 8 months and 6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 toxicity was febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were rare. There were no treatmentrelated deaths.

The combination of 5-FU/LV and irinotecan as first-line treatment was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation would be worthwhile, particularly in elderly or debilitated patients who cannot tolerate aggressive chemotherapy.     

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.     

Downstaging by regional chemotherapy of non-resectable isolated colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: To improve the course of isolated non-resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) by hepatic arterial infusion treatment. Patients with CRLM have a worse prognosis than those whose liver metastases are resectable. Systemic (i.v.) chemotherapy for CRLM/colorectal metastases with 5-fluorouracil+folinic acid (5-FU+FA) i.v. may result in median survival times of 6.4-14.3 months. Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUDR) has been demonstrated in a meta-analysis of randomized trials to be superior to i.v. treatment/palliative care (median survival 15 vs. 10 months). The benefit of HAI with 5-FUDR, although recommended as treatment for CRLM, is severely compromised by the 5-FUDR induced hepatotoxicity, leading eventually to sclerosing cholangitis (SC)/liver cirrhosis. We have developed a stepwise protocol for HAI in CRLM, which is superior to HAI with 5-FUDR and to systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1982 and 1997, 168 CRLM patients were treated within the following protocols. In protocol A, 48 CRLM patients received HAI with 5-FUDR. In protocol B, 46 patients received 5-FUDR i.a. (HAI)+i.v. In protocol C 5-FU+FA were delivered via HAI in 24 patients with CRLM. In protocol D, based on in vitro phase II studies and the results of protocol C, mitoxantrone and mitomycin C were added to 5-FU+FA (MFFM). Fifty (50) CRLM patients received HAI with HFFM. RESULTS: The response rates, median survival time, systemic toxicity and SC rate were: 42%, 20.8 months, 0-19% and 38% for protocol A; 46%, 20.8 months, 0-20% and 41% for protocol B; 45%, 19.8 months, 4-25% and 0% for protocol C; and 66%, 27.4 months, 2-26% and 0% for protocol D. The surgically placed ports for HAI in protocols C and D functioned in 90%, 82% and 76% of patients, 6, 9, and 11 months after beginning HAI. Quality of life in protocol D was high. Nine patients from protocols C and D with either partial (PR, seven patients) or complete (CR, two patients) remissions received a secondary liver resection without hospital mortality, and seven of nine patients are alive 2-58 months after liver resection. The other two died 11 and 22 months after resection. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal treatment of CRLM was found to be protocol D: HAI with MFFM. The results of this protocol, including high remission rate, long median survival time, good port function, good quality of life and, interestingly, the possibility of downstaging and resecting primarily non-resectable metastases, seem to be superior to HAI with 5-FUDR or 5-FU+FA and to systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU+FA. This hypothesis is currently being examined in a phase III study (HAI with MFFM vs. 5-FU+FA i.v.).     

A comparison between hepatic artery ligation and portal 5-Fu infusion versus 5-Fu intra arterial infusion for colorectal liver metastases.

AIM: A prospective randomized study was executed comparing two regimens of regional therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Eighteen patients were allocated to hepatic artery occlusion for 16 h followed by intraportal 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) infusion (1000 mg/m(2)) for 5 days every sixth week (HAO). Twenty-one patients received intra-arterial 5-Fu infusion+Leucovorin (100 mg) i.v. for 2 days every second week (HAI). The follow up every third month included CT and CEA. Thirteen patients had limited extrahepatic cancer. At tumor progression regional therapy was stopped and systemic chemotherapy or the best supportive care was administered. RESULTS: The study was discontinued after randomization of 39 patients. No significant difference in survival within patients with and without extrahepatic cancer was present. The mean survival was longer in the HAI group than for the HAO group (19 months versus 13 months, p=0.0147) (median 18 (8-37) versus 12 (2-26). PR and SD were registered in 8/18 in the HAO group and 17/21 patients in HAI group. The median time to progress was 4 (1-22) months versus 7 (1-23) months for the HAO and HAI group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Regional intraarterial infusion with 5-Fu gives significantly better survival than hepatic artery occlusion followed by portal infusion. A limited amount of extrahepatic cancer does not influence survival time. A trial comparing hepatic artery 5-FU infusion and Leucovorin versus the most effective systemic therapy is warranted.     

Phase I/II study of irinotecan, UFT and leucovorin with hepatic arterial infusion using 5-FU in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11), UFT and leucovorin (LV) combined with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Methods

Patients were treated concurrently with escalating doses of intravenous CPT-11 (100, 120, and 140?mg/m²) on day 1 of each 14-day treatment cycle, with oral UFT (300?mg/m² per day) and LV (75?mg/body per day) on days 1?C7 of each cycle, and with HAI 5-FU (2,000?mg/week) on days 8?C14 of each cycle.

Results

Twelve patients were enrolled in the phase I study. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Consequently, the recommended dose of CPT-11 for the phase II study was determined to be 140?mg/m². Twenty-two patients were evaluated in the phase II study. Five patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia, two experienced grade 3 anorexia, two experienced nausea, and two experienced vomiting. An overall response was observed in 19 out of 22 patients (86.4%). The median progression-free survival period was 11.2?months, and the 3-year survival rate was 50.6%. Fourteen patients (63.6%) were ultimately able to undergo a complete liver resection.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy with CPT-11 and UFT/LV combined with HAI yielded a high response rate and enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. Further trials are warranted.     

Hepatic arterial oxaliplatin infusion plus intravenous chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with inoperable hepatic metastases: a trial of the gastrointestinal group of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

PURPOSE: Isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer constitute a frequent and serious therapeutic problem that has led to the evaluation of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of different drugs. Oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin is effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this context, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate concomitant administration of oxaliplatin by HAI and intravenous (IV) FU plus leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol (leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), FU 400 mg/m(2) IV bolus, FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-hour continuous infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had metastatic colorectal cancer that was restricted to the liver and inoperable. The patients were not to have previously received oxaliplatin. After surgical insertion of a catheter in the hepatic artery, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) HAI combined with FU + leucovorin IV according to the LV5FU2 protocol. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. Response was evaluated every 2 months. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included, and 26 patients were treated. Two hundred courses of therapy were administered, and the median number of courses received was eight courses (range, zero to 20 courses). The most frequent toxicity consisted of neutropenia. The main toxicity related to HAI was pain. The intent-to-treat objective response rate was 64% (95% CI, 44% to 81%; 18 of 28 patients). With a median follow-up of 23 months, the median overall and disease-free survival times were 27 and 27 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin HAI and FU + leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol is feasible and effective in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer.     

A multicenter phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) alternated with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose In this multicenter phase II study the efficacy and safety of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) were assessed as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and methods Enrolled in the study were 43 patients with advanced CRC. They received CPT-11 350 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, alternating with LV 20 mg/m² i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m² i.v. daily for five consecutive days, on days 22–26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One cycle consisted of 6 weeks.Results A total of 179 cycles were administered with a median of four per patient (range one to nine). Efficacy was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall objective response rate was 30% (95% CI 16–44), with four complete responses and nine partial responses, whereas 20 patients (4%) showed stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 9.0 months and median survival was 18.5 months. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was mainly related to CPT-11 rather than to 5-FU (9.3% vs 4.7% of patients), whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher during 5-FU administration (16.3% vs 7.0% of patients).Conclusions The alternating schedule of CPT-11 with 5 days bolus of 5-FU and low-dose LV showed a clinical benefit in terms of tumor growth control as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC. The overall safety data confirmed this alternating combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Alternating hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase II trial using intermittent percutaneous hepatic arterial access.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective response to a short course of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) using temporary, percutaneously placed catheters alternating with systemic prolonged continuous infusion fluorouracil (ci 5-FU) and daily oral leucovorin (L). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated (except for adjuvant therapy) adults with liver-predominant metastases, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Treatment regimen included HAI with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) 60 mg/m2/d and L 15 mg/m2/d continuously infused daily for 4 days. After a 1-week rest, ci 5-FU was administered through a central venous access device using a dose of 180 mg/m2/d with a fixed dose of oral L at 5 mg/m2/d for 21 out of 28 days. Cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. After four cycles of therapy, patients were maintained on ci 5-FU and daily oral L until evidence of progression. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled onto this trial. One patient was ineligible. The objective response rate for all patients (17 partial, zero complete) was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). Five patients were not able to receive at least one complete cycle of HAI. Among patients who received at least one complete cycle of HAI, the response rate was 46% (95% CI, 30% to 62%). Five patients underwent a liver resection after enrolling onto the protocol. At the time of analysis, estimated median time to progression was 6 months, and estimated median overall survival was 13 months. CONCLUSION: The objective response rate was comparable to that achieved with more prolonged and more frequent HAI using FUDR. This approach should be studied as an acceptable alternative to surgically placed hepatic arterial catheters/pumps and may have a role as neoadjuvant therapy for liver metastases that are unresectable, as well as an adjuvant role for patients with resected hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II study of UFT with leucovorin and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI): first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) combined with intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan every 3 weeks (TEGAFIRI) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients received oral UFT 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) in three divided daily doses for 14 days followed by a 1-week rest and i.v. irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. Tumour responses, assessed every two cycles using RECIST criteria, were reviewed by an independent review committee. In 52 evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 33% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 20-47%; 1 complete and 16 partial responses). The median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 3.02-7.52 months) and median overall survival was 14.9 months (11.73-17.97 months). A total of 307 cycles were administered, with a median number of five cycles per patient (range: 1-10). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25% of patients), diarrhoea (22%), vomiting (11%) and anaemia (11%). The TEGAFIRI regimen is a feasible, well-tolerated and convenient treatment option for patients with non-resectable mCRC.     

Prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for the prevention of liver metastasis in patients with colon carcinoma: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: The liver is the most frequent site of recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon carcinoma. For liver metastasis, a high response rate can be achieved with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy. In the current study, the authors administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjuvant chemotherapy by HAI to patients with colon carcinoma without liver metastases and studied its effects on recurrence in the liver and survival. METHODS: A total of 316 patients with preoperative Stage II or Stage III colon carcinoma (according to the 1997 revision of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system) were randomly assigned to receive surgery plus 3-week continuous HAI of 5-FU or surgery alone. There were 305 eligible patients, of whom the 119 patients assigned to the HAI arm actually received 5-FU. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, whereas the secondary endpoints were overall survival and liver metastasis-free survival. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: There were no significant differences noted in morbidity between the two treatment arms. During the follow-up period (median, 59.0 months), the incidence of liver metastasis was significantly decreased in the HAI arm whereas there were no significant differences reported between the 2 arms with regard to the frequency of metastasis at other sites. In the HAI arm, the risk ratio for recurrence was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.24-0.64; P=0.0002), the risk ratio for death was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.67; P=0.0009), and the risk ratio for liver metastasis was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.66; P=0.0005). These differences were found to be significant only for patients with Stage III disease. Toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: A schedule of 3-week HAI of 5-FU given as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with Stage III colon carcinoma appeared to contribute to a significant decrease in the frequency of liver metastases and was associated with an improved survival rate.     

Phase I trial of systemic oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy with hepatic arterial infusion in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days. RESULTS: The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), CPT-11 150 mg/m(2), and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg x 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), LV 400 mg/m(2), and FU 1,400 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.