Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa for anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD: a systematic review

Background Anemia management in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is associated with cardiovascular and cost benefits, slows decline in renal function, and prevents mortality. Different reviews have focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (MPG-EPO), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, in CKD patients regardless of dialysis dependency and others have studied this novel agent exclusively in CKD patients receiving dialysis. Aim of the review To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MPG-EPO compared with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents (in particular darbepoetin alfa) for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Methods A systematic review of original studies published mainly in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, clinical trials registries, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MPG-EPO with other erythropoiesis stimulating agents or placebo among patients with anemia of CKD who were not yet receiving dialysis. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using standardized data abstraction tool. Results Four trials involving 1,155 patients were included in the review. The changes in hemoglobin level from the baseline reported by the reviewed studies demonstrate that MPG-EPO was clinically non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. In addition, the studies documented that MPG-EPO-treated patients experienced a lower rate of hemoglobin level above the target range of 12–13 g/dL than darbepoetin-treated patients. The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusion was higher among patients who received darbepoetin alfa than those who received MPG-EPO. However, the time to hemoglobin response was longer with MPG-EPO than with darbepoetin. Finally, the incidences of serious adverse events were similar between the two therapeutic agents. Conclusion There are currently only few well-designed head-to-head RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of MPG-EPO compared with other ESAs in non-dialysis-dependent patients. MPG-EPO therapy compared with darbepoetin alfa has demonstrated favorable effects of increasing and maintaining hemoglobin concentrations to recommended target levels. This mini-review is not conclusive due to limited number of studies. Therefore, the beneficial effects and tolerability of MPG-EPO among non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients should be further investigated, given the economic and clinical benefits of managing anemia in this population.     

Methoxypolyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease

Therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is a well-established treatment for renal anemia. ESAs are highly effective at correcting the underlying anemia, restoring energy levels and increasing patient well-being and quality of life. Anemia correction has considerable secondary benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality reduction. However, because of the relatively short halflife of ESAs, they generally have to be administered one to three times weekly in most patients. In order to overcome this shortcoming, in recent years pharmacological research has tried to modify the molecular structure of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) in order to improve pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and to allow a reduction in the frequency of administration. Covalent addition of the water-soluble polyethylene glycol moiety has been successfully used to improve the pharmacokinetics of a number of proteins and reduce their immunogenicity. A modified version of rHuEPO incorporating this large polymer chain, called continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA), has been recently synthesized. Data from animal studies indicate that CERA has a prolonged half-life in comparison with rHuEPO that may allow less frequent administration. Results of phase II and III clinical trials suggest that this agent is effective in maintaining hemoglobin levels after switching from rHuEPO therapy or darbepoetin alpha when administered up to once a month. This less frequent administration schedule may be an advantage for patients and healthcare providers. In addition, this agent may give increased hemoglobin stability over time.     

Epoetin delta is effective for the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease

ABSTRACT

Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of epoetin delta for the treatment of anaemia in dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Research design and methods: This was a 12‐week, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator study. CKD patients who were naïve to epoetin treatment and had haemoglobin < 10?g/dL were randomized to epoetin delta 15, 50, 150, or 300 IU/kg or epoetin alfa 50 IU/kg. Patients initially entered a correction phase until they recorded haemoglobin of ≥ 11.5?g/dL for two consecutive weekly measurements or one haemoglobin measurement of ≥ 13?g/dL (correction success). A maintenance phase followed where the dose was adjusted to maintain haemoglobin ≥ 10.5?g/dL. Maintenance success was defined as haemoglobin > 10.5?g/dL at Week 12. Total success was defined as achieving maintenance and correction success.

Main outcome measures: The primary objective was to demonstrate that the proportion of patients achieving total success was greater in the pooled 150?IU/kg and 300?IU/kg groups compared with the 15?IU/kg dose group.

Results: Total success was achieved in 55.6% of patients in the pooled highest epoetin delta group compared with 4.5% in the lowest dose group. There was no significant difference in total success for the epoetin delta and epoetin alfa 50?IU/kg groups. Significant increases in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were observed in the 150 and 300?IU/kg dose groups. Adverse events occurred at frequencies expected for this patient group.

Conclusions: Epoetin delta was effective in increasing haemoglobin levels in patients with baseline haemoglobin of < 10?g/dL.     

Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder: a review of its use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The anticholinergic agent tiotropium bromide (Spiriva?) is a long-acting bronchodilator that is indicated for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of tiotropium bromide inhalation powder, administered using the HandiHaler? device, in patients with COPD, as well as reviewing its pharmacological properties and the results of pharmacoeconomic analyses. Shorter-term placebo-controlled trials in patients with COPD demonstrated significantly higher trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) responses with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, confirming it has a duration of action of ≥24 hours and is suitable for once-daily administration. Lung function improved to a greater extent with tiotropium bromide than with ipratropium bromide or, in most instances, salmeterol. Indacaterol was shown to be noninferior to tiotropium bromide in terms of the trough FEV(1) response. The large, 4-year UPLIFT? trial did not show a significant reduction in the annual rate of decline in FEV(1) with tiotropium bromide versus placebo in patients with COPD, although subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly lower rate of decline with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in some patient groups (e.g. patients with moderate COPD, patients aged ≥50 years, patients not receiving maintenance therapy at baseline). Tiotropium bromide prevented exacerbations in patients with COPD, with a significantly lower exacerbation rate and a significantly longer time to first exacerbation seen with tiotropium bromide than with placebo or salmeterol. Exacerbation rates did not significantly differ between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and those receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Tiotropium bromide also had beneficial effects on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and other endpoints, such as dyspnoea and rescue medication use. Combination therapy with tiotropium bromide plus formoterol with or without budesonide improved lung function to a significantly greater extent than tiotropium bromide alone in patients with COPD. In addition, exacerbation rates were lower and HR-QOL was improved with tiotropium bromide plus budesonide/formoterol versus tiotropium bromide alone. Although the addition of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate to tiotropium bromide did not reduce the COPD exacerbation rate, it did improve lung function and HR-QOL. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is generally well tolerated in patients with COPD, with anticholinergic adverse events (e.g. dry mouth, constipation, gastrointestinal obstruction, dysuria) among the most commonly reported adverse events. The UPLIFT? trial showed no significant difference between tiotropium bromide and placebo recipients in the risk of stroke, and the risk of serious cardiac adverse events (including congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction) was significantly lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo. The absence of a detrimental effect on cardiovascular outcomes was supported by the results of a meta-analysis and pooled analyses. In addition, on-treatment mortality was lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in the UPLIFT? trial. Pooled analyses showed significantly lower cardiovascular mortality with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, with a meta-analysis demonstrating no significant difference between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and controls in cardiovascular mortality. Results of modelled pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in several developed countries suggest that tiotropium bromide is a cost-effective option in patients with COPD. In conclusion, tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is a useful option for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.     

Rasagiline: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease

Rasagiline (Azilect) is a novel, selective, irreversible second-generation inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B). It is administered orally once daily and is approved in the US, Canada, Mexico, Israel and the EU for use as monotherapy and as adjunct therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.Results of well designed clinical studies indicate that rasagiline is effective as initial monotherapy and improves Parkinson's symptomatology in patients with early Parkinson's disease. In addition, when administered in conjunction with levodopa, in patients with moderate to advanced disease and motor fluctuations, rasagiline reduces mean daily 'off' time and increases daily 'on' time without troublesome dyskinesias, compared with controls. Rasagiline is generally well tolerated as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy and is administered once daily. Thus, rasagiline, administered as a simple and convenient dosage regimen, is a well tolerated and effective option for monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease and for adjunctive therapy in patients with moderate to advanced disease.     

Tolcapone: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease

Tolcapone (Tasmar) is a selective, reversible inhibitor of peripheral and central catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Results of well designed studies indicate that oral tolcapone is an effective adjunct to levodopa plus a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease. Tolcapone significantly improves levodopa-induced motor fluctuations and significantly reduces levodopa requirements. The drug is generally well tolerated, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being dopaminergic related. Thus, tolcapone is a useful option in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease who are receiving levodopa/DDCI and are not responding to, or are not candidates for, other adjunctive treatments.     

Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease

Ropinirole, a non-ergoline dopamine agonist, has selective affinity for dopamine D2-like receptors and little or no affinity for non-dopaminergic brain receptors. Ropinirole is indicated as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. It is also indicated, and recent clinical trials have focused on its use, as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease. In the symptomatic treatment of early Parkinson's disease ropinirole monotherapy was significantly more effective than placebo in 2 multicentre, randomised, double-blind trials of 3 to 12 months duration as assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores and Clinical Global Impression/Clinical Global Evaluation Scales. In a similarly designed 3-year comparative study with bromocriptine, ropinirole recipients showed a significant improvement in UPDRS- activities of daily living (ADL) scores; however, motor scores were similar between the 2 groups. Ropinirole and levodopa treatments were similar in efficacy as measured by UPDRS ADL scores, although ropinirole recipients showed significantly less improvement on UPDRS motor scores at the 5-year study end-point in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial. As an adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with more advanced Parkinson's disease, ropinirole was reported to be as effective as bromocriptine and significantly more effective than placebo. In general in the comparisons with placebo ropinirole allowed a > or =20% reduction in the concomitant dose of levodopa without compromising efficacy in a significant proportion of patients and, in some trials decreased the amount of awake time spent in the 'off' state ('off' state is defined as a gradual return to parkinsonism despite adequate medication). Ropinirole was well tolerated either as monotherapy or as an adjunct to levodopa treatment. Nausea, dizziness and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events and were reported at a higher incidence by patients receiving ropinirole than by those receiving placebo. In patients with early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole generally showed a similar overall tolerability profile to bromocriptine although, over a 3-year period nausea was more commonly reported with ropinirole recipients. In a 5-year study, the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower with ropinirole than with levodopa regardless of levodopa supplementation. Prior to the addition of supplementary levodopa 5% of ropinirole recipients had experienced dyskinesia compared with 36% of those receiving levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole monotherapy was more efficacious than bromocriptine with regard to improvement in activities of daily living, and need for supplemental levodopa. Ropinirole recipients had a higher requirement for levodopa supplementation than levodopa recipients in a 5-year study, but the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower with ropinirole than with levodopa (markedly so in the one third of ropinirole recipients who were able to remain on monotherapy with no levodopa supplementation). Thus available data suggest that ropinirole may provide a means of treating early Parkinson's disease while minimising the risk of dyskinesia and delaying the need for supplemental levodopa in some patients. In addition, ropinirole is also efficacious in the management of more advanced Parkinson's disease in patients who are experiencing motor complications after long term levodopa use.     

Roxadustat in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Anaemia is one of the hallmarks of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD); it correlates with a lower quality of life and increased cardiovascular risk. Currently its management is based on iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) therapy. Given safety issues on ESA therapy and excessive iron use, anaemia management is still suboptimal.

Areas covered: The inhibitors of the prolyl-hydroxylases domain (PHD) are oral drugs which activate the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) and stimulate the production of endogenous erythropoietin. Roxadustat (FG-4592) is a second-generation PHD inhibitor; it is undergoing now phase-III clinical development.

Expert opinion: Phase-II clinical trials have shown that roxadustat is effective and save in the short term in either non-dialysis or dialysis CKD patients. Roxadustat is a chemical drug and thus has the potential of being cheaper than traditional ESAs. Given that the peaks of endogenous EPO are much lower than those observed with traditional ESA, it is possible to speculate the roxadustat (and more in general PHD inhibitors) will be safer than ESA on cardiovascular safety end-points. Considering that HIFs are involved in different pathways, with possible promotion of relevant side effects, their safety must be proven in long-term studies.     

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the health system management of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease

Anaemia is prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease. If left untreated, it greatly affects patient survival, quality of life and functional status. Epoetin and darbepoetin are two biotechnology drugs that effectively stimulate the production of red blood cells. These drugs have been shown to significantly increase haemoglobin concentrations and improve quality of life. So far, there have been no head-to-head pharmacoeconomic studies that have compared epoetin to darbepoetin. Health system decision makers need to evaluate important considerations when comparing these agents. These considerations include drug acquisition costs, the patient population being treated, the location of drug administration (in-patient versus ambulatory) and federal government reimbursement. This review details these important pharmacoeconomic considerations.     

Agalsidase Beta: a review of its use in the management of Fabry disease

Agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme) is a recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A enzyme approved for intravenous use in the treatment of Fabry disease. Fabry disease is a progressive, multisystemic, potentially life threatening disorder caused by a deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A. This deficiency results in accumulation of glycosphingolipids, particularly globotriaosylceramide (GL-3), in the lysosomes of various tissues. This accumulation is the underlying driver of disease progression. Agalsidase beta provides an exogenous source of alpha-galactosidase A.Intravenous agalsidase beta is effective and well tolerated in patients with Fabry disease. In a phase III trial, agalsidase beta was shown to clear GL-3 from various target cells and, in a subsequent extension of this trial, prevent GL-3 reaccumulation. In a post-approval trial, agalsidase beta was shown to provide significant clinical benefit by reducing the risk of a major clinical event. Thus, agalsidase beta represents an important advance in the treatment of Fabry disease, and agalsidase beta therapy should be strongly considered in patients with Fabry disease who are suitable candidates.     

Adjuvanted Lyme disease vaccine: a review of its use in the management of Lyme disease

Lyme disease is a potentially serious infection which is caused by the spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi and is endemic in certain areas of North America, Europe and Asia. Lyme disease vaccine (LYMErix) is an adjuvanted formulation of the outer surface protein A (OspA) of the causative spirochaete. It acts by inducing high titres of anti-OspA antibodies (anti-OspA), which must be present in vaccinated individuals before exposure to B. burgdorferi to provide protection against Lyme disease. Lyme disease vaccine efficacy against Lyme disease was 80% for definite and asymptomatic cases and 76% for definite cases at year 2 using the recommended dosage regimen [30 microg at months 0, 1 and 12 (0, 1, 12 schedule)] in a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial in 10,936 enrolled adult volunteers who resided in areas of the US endemic for Lyme disease. On the basis of an anti-OspA correlate of protection, Lyme disease vaccine 30 microg was equally effective when administered by a shorter schedule (0, 1, 6 schedule); > or = 90% of adult volunteers developed protective anti-OspA titres with this or the 0, 1, 12 schedule. Although published data are fewer, a 0, 1, 2 schedule has also shown promise in adults. In addition, virtually all children (aged 2 to 15 years) given Lyme disease vaccine 30 microg developed protective anti-OspA titres, but published data are also limited and results of a large paediatric trial are awaited with interest. Long term protection against Lyme disease appears to be possible with Lyme disease vaccine. Although anti-OspA titres decline rapidly after completion of the recommended schedule, booster doses of 30 microg of the vaccine induced protective anti-OspA titres in > or = 96% of adult volunteers when administered 12 and/or 24 months later. Lyme disease vaccine 30 microg is well tolerated: most vaccination-related adverse events were transient and mild or moderate in severity in clinical trials. The most common spontaneously reported adverse event was pain at the injection site in 24% of vaccine recipients (vs 7.6% of the placebo group). The incidence of spontaneously reported, early nonspecific systemic adverse events was <4% but was higher with the vaccine than with placebo for some events (e.g. myalgias, fever and chills but not arthralgia). There appeared to be no association between the vaccine and the incidence of arthritis or any late systemic adverse events. The tolerability profile of Lyme disease vaccine did not appear to vary with the schedule of administration, nor to differ between adults and children. Conclusions: Lyme disease vaccine, an adjuvanted formulation of OspA, protects most adults against Lyme disease when administered by the recommended 0, 1, 12 schedule before disease exposure, and is well tolerated. The optimal schedule(s) of administration, duration of protection against Lyme disease, long term tolerability in adults and potential role in children are not fully defined for this vaccine. Lyme disease vaccine is indicated in North America for active immunisation of adults at moderate to high risk of contracting Lyme disease.     

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in anaemia due to chronic kidney disease: a cost-minimization analysis

Background Some publications have shown that equivalent doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) defined on label differ from those effective in clinical practice. Therefore, real costs could vary from theoretical costs in the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objectives To perform a cost-minimization analysis to establish the economic impact of the principal ESAs used in treating anaemia secondary to CKD in daily practice. Secondary objectives: to determine patient-month cost based on the erythropoietin resistance index (ERI); to analyze the difference in cost between pre-dialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients; and to analyze the association between iron deposits and ESA cost. Setting This study was carried out at 2 tertiary hospitals in Spain. Method A multicentre cost-minimization analysis was performed in adult outpatients treated with ESAs for anaemia due to CKD. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the patient-month cost for each ESA. Results 409 patients were included. Median patient-month cost was: epoetin (103.2 [63.7, 187.8] euros), darbepoetin α (134.4 [67.2, 216.0] euros) and CERA (147.5 [98.3, 196.7] euros). Median patient-month cost according to ERI was: epoetin (1.60 [0.90, 2.60] euros/kg), darbepoetin α (2.01 [0.95, 3.48] euros/kg) and CERA (1.87 [1.33, 3.00] euros/kg). Median patient-month cost in pre-dialysis was 126.0 (73.7, 201.6) euros and in PD 153.0 (100.2, 275.4) euros. Median patient-month cost for patients with TSI < 20 % was 147.5 (98.3, 224.9) euros compared to 100.9 (67.2, 196.7) euros which was the cost for patients with IST ≥ 20 %. The median patient-month cost for patients with ferritin < 100 mcg/l was 134.4 (85.0, 201.6) euros compared to 100.8 (68.8, 196.7) euros, which was the cost for patients with ferritin ≥ 100 mcg/l (p = 0.242). Conclusion Doses of CERA used in clinical practice are lower than those recommended on label, which directly influences cost and treatment efficiency. Cost stratification based on iron deposits has shown that patients with low TSI or ferritin require higher doses and consequently an associated higher cost. Thus, to guarantee adequate iron levels is essential in the rational use of ESAs.     

Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its use in the management of chronic heart failure

Candesartan cilexetil is the orally administered pro-drug of candesartan, a highly selective antagonist of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor that mediates the pressor activities of angiotensin II. Candesartan cilexetil is widely used for the treatment of hypertension and has recently been approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function.Results of the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) programme suggest that oral candesartan cilexetil reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with CHF and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =40%. There are cardiovascular benefits when candesartan cilexetil is administered as an alternative to an ACE inhibitor, or as an add-on to current treatment regimens that include an ACE inhibitor, in symptomatic CHF. While tolerability is generally good, renal monitoring is required. The recent approval of candesartan cilexetil as both add-on and alternative therapy to ACE inhibitors in patients with CHF and impaired LV systolic function recognises the cardiovascular benefits of candesartan cilexetil in both types of treatment regimens.     

Deferasirox : a review of its use in the management of transfusional chronic iron overload

Deferasirox (Exjade) is an oral, once-daily iron chelator widely approved for the treatment of transfusional chronic iron overload. In the EU, deferasirox is indicated in patients with beta-thalassaemia major aged > or =6 years and, in the US, in all transfusional chronic iron overload patients aged > or =2 years. Deferasirox is highly selective for iron as Fe3+. In approximately 1-year clinical trials of patients with transfusional chronic iron overload associated with beta-thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, myelodysplastic syndrome or other rare chronic anaemias, deferasirox 20 or 30 mg/kg/day had a beneficial effect on liver iron concentrations (LIC) and serum ferritin levels; tolerability issues were clinically manageable with regular patient monitoring. Although longer-term efficacy and tolerability data are required, in particular examining the prevention of iron overload-related complications and the effect of deferasirox on renal function, deferasirox is an easily administered iron chelator and is a valuable option in the management of transfusional chronic iron overload.     

Iron and the anaemia of chronic disease: a review and strategic recommendations

ABSTRACT

Background: The incidence of anaemia is high in many chronic conditions, yet it often receives little attention.

Scope/methods: A panel of international experts with experience in haematology, nephrology, oncology, rheumatology and pharmacy was convened to prepare strategic guidelines. A focused literature search was conducted after key issues had been identified. A series of recommendations was agreed, backed, wherever possible, by published evidence which is included in the annotations.

Recommendations: Anaemia is a critical issue for patients with chronic diseases. Healthcare professionals need to recognise that anaemia is a frequent companion of cancer and chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and heart failure. It reduces patients' quality of life and can increase morbidity and mortality. Anaemia should be considered as a disordered process in which the rate of red cell production fails to match the rate of destruction which leads eventually to a reduction in haemoglobin concentration; this process is common to all chronic anaemias. The aim of anaemia management should be to restore patient functionality and quality of life by restoring effective red cell production. Blood transfusion can elevate haemoglobin concentration in the short term but does nothing to address the underlying disorder; red cell transfusion is, therefore, not an appropriate treatment for chronic anaemia. Patients with anaemia of chronic disease may benefit from iron therapy and/or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Intravenous iron should be considered since this can be given safely to patients with chronic diseases while intramuscular iron causes unacceptable adverse effects and oral iron has limited efficacy in chronic anaemia.

Conclusion: The management of anaemia calls for the development of a specialist service together with education of all healthcare professionals and transfer of skills from areas of good practice. Improvement in the management of anaemia requires a fundamental change of attitude from healthcare professionals.     

Iron and the anaemia of chronic disease: a review and strategic recommendations

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anaemia is high in many chronic conditions, yet it often receives little attention. SCOPE/METHODS: A panel of international experts with experience in haematology, nephrology, oncology, rheumatology and pharmacy was convened to prepare strategic guidelines. A focused literature search was conducted after key issues had been identified. A series of recommendations was agreed, backed, wherever possible, by published evidence which is included in the annotations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Anaemia is a critical issue for patients with chronic diseases. Healthcare professionals need to recognise that anaemia is a frequent companion of cancer and chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and heart failure. It reduces patients' quality of life and can increase morbidity and mortality. Anaemia should be considered as a disordered process in which the rate of red cell production fails to match the rate of destruction which leads eventually to a reduction in haemoglobin concentration; this process is common to all chronic anaemias. The aim of anaemia management should be to restore patient functionality and quality of life by restoring effective red cell production. Blood transfusion can elevate haemoglobin concentration in the short term but does nothing to address the underlying disorder; red cell transfusion is, therefore, not an appropriate treatment for chronic anaemia. Patients with anaemia of chronic disease may benefit from iron therapy and/or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Intravenous iron should be considered since this can be given safely to patients with chronic diseases while intramuscular iron causes unacceptable adverse effects and oral iron has limited efficacy in chronic anaemia. CONCLUSION: The management of anaemia calls for the development of a specialist service together with education of all healthcare professionals and transfer of skills from areas of good practice. Improvement in the management of anaemia requires a fundamental change of attitude from healthcare professionals.     

Rotigotine transdermal patch: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease

A transdermal patch formulation of the non-ergolinic dopamine agonist rotigotine (Neupro) is indicated for use as monotherapy in the treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease or, in the EU, as an adjunct to levodopa across all disease stages. Transdermal rotigotine is an effective and generally well tolerated addition to the armamentarium for the control of Parkinson's disease, with the once-daily transdermal patch system offering several practical advantages and the possible benefits of avoiding pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. Transdermal rotigotine was superior to placebo in patients with early-stage and advanced Parkinson's disease, although noninferiority to the oral dopamine agonists ropinirole or pramipexole was not consistently demonstrated. Additional active comparator trials would be of interest. In the meantime, transdermal rotigotine offers a convenient new treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease.     

Nebivolol: a review of its use in the management of hypertension and chronic heart failure

Nebivolol is a third-generation beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. It differs from other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists as it combines highly selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist properties with nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory actions and beneficial effects on endothelial function. Nebivolol is approved in Europe and several other countries for the treatment of essential hypertension and in Europe for the treatment of stable mild or moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) in addition to standard therapies in elderly patients aged >or=70 years.Nebivolol is an effective antihypertensive agent and is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. The drug also effectively decreased the composite endpoint of mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with CHF and was generally well tolerated in this population. Nebivolol should be considered as an alternative first-line treatment option for patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate essential hypertension and in elderly patients with CHF.