吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤11例

  目的  探讨吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤的临床疗效。  方法  收集11例对一线化疗药物耐药的晚期软组织肉瘤患者,应用吉西他滨（剂量为900 mg/m2,第1和第8天）联合多西他赛（剂量为100 mg/m2,第8天）每3周重复给药。如患者曾经接受放疗,吉西他滨剂量减为675 mg/m2,多西他赛剂量减为75 mg/m2。  结果  接受化疗的患者总有效率（CR+PR+SD）为54.5%。中位随访时间为19（1~36）个月,中位总生存期为15.4个月（95%CI:8.012~21.598）和中位无进展生存期为8.4个月（95%CI:7.342~8.768）。12个月和36个月的生存率分别是81.8%和27.3%。吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗软组织肉瘤最常见的非血液学不良反应是黏膜炎,对症处理明显好转。  结论  吉西他滨联合多西他赛作为二线化疗药物治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者具有较好的临床疗效,且有较好的耐受性,本研究结论为该方案的大样本临床试验提供了依据。      

Gemcitabine combined with docetaxel for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose. To assess the efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Patients and Methods. Thirty-four patients with unresectable stage III, IVA, and IVB pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for this study. The first 18 patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m² intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, and 15 and docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV on day 1, repeated every 28 days. Due to a high incidence of myelosuppression in this first group, the treatment schedule was modified in the remaining patients to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² IV and docetaxel 40 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule. The primary study endpoints were objective response rate and duration of survival. Results. Ten of 33 evaluable patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 30.3% (95% CI, 16.21%-48.87%). Partial responses noted in the pancreas and a variety of metastatic sites were maintained for 4 to 12 months (median 6 months). Twelve additional patients (36%) experienced stable disease. The median time to progression was 6 months, and median survival was 10.5 months. The toxicity profile of the modified gemcitabine/docetaxel schedule was more favorable than that associated with the initial regimen, particularly with respect to hematologic toxicity. Conclusion. The response and survival data reported here for combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel are encouraging given the poor prognosis associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer. These data suggest that gemcitabine plus docetaxel may be more effective than either agent alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and warrants further study.     

Efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination as a second line therapy for patients with advanced stage soft tissue sarcoma

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of a gemcitabine plus docetaxel regimen as a second line therapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resistant to doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based therapy. Patients and Methods: Medical records of 64 patients with advanced STS who received gemcitabine plus docetaxel regimen as a second line treatment between May 2006 and June 2011 were examined. All patients had been previously treated with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide-based regimen at first line setting. Patients received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days one and eight intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day eight intravenously over one hour. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Results: The male-to-female ratio was 37/27 and the median age was 44 years (range; 19-67 years). Objective responses were observed in 13 (20.3 %) patients (2 CR, 11 PR) and stable disease in 21 (32.8 %). Total clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 34 (53.1 %). Median overall survival (OS) was 18 months (95% confidence interval (CI):12.1-23.9) and Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.6-6). A total of 243 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The median number of cycle was 3 (range;1-11). The most common grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (35.9 %). The most common nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea/vomiting (37.5 %), mucositis (32.8 %), peripheral neuropathy (29.7%), and fatigue (26 %). There was no toxicity-related death. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine plus docetaxel is an active and tolerable regimen as a second line therapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma who have failed doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based therapy.     

Combination second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-containing chemotherapy: a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE: In a randomized trial, docetaxel monotherapy yielded longer survival than the best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, and combination chemotherapy regimens containing docetaxel have been assessed to enhance the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy. We conducted a phase I/II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel administration was fixed at a dosage of 60 mg/m(2) on day 8, and gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8. The starting dose level of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m(2) (level 0), and the subsequent dose level of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m(2) (level +1). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In the phase I study, 13 patients were enrolled, and in the phase II study, 29 patients were enrolled. Neutropenic fever and omission of treatment on day 8 due to leukopenia (leukocyte count less than 3000/mm(3)) were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three of six patients experienced DLTs at level +1, which was the maximum tolerated dose. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 (level 0) was recommended for the phase II study. An objective response was observed in 8 (28%) of the 29 patients. The median time to disease progression was 4.2 months (95% CI 0.9-7.7 months). The median survival time was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.9-12.4 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 41%. The most common toxicity, though mild, was hematologic, and consisted of grade 4 neutropenia (18%), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (11%), and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (11%). There were no toxic deaths. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (4%) and rash (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and well tolerated in patients with recurrent NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and with a good PS.     

A multicenter phase II study of sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the sequential administration of vinorelbine/cisplatin (VC regimen) followed by the docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG regimen) combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Fifty-nine previously untreated patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC received three cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1), and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; VC regimen), followed by six cycles of docetaxel (65 mg/m(2), day 1) and gemcitabine (1,500 mg/m(2), day 1), (DG regimen) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: One (1.7%) complete and 26 (44.1%) partial responses were achieved for an overall response rate of 45.8% (95% CI 33.05-58.48%); 12 (20.3%) patients had stable disease and 20 (33.9%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.3 months, the median survival time 12.5 months and the 1-year survival rate 51%. The main toxicity was grade III/IV neutropenia occurring in 25.5% of patients; all other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were relatively infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential administration of VC and DG regimens was well tolerated and active against advanced NSCLC and merits to be further evaluated against a single doublet.     

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as front-line chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a noncisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen combining gemcitabine and docetaxel as front-line chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site. METHODS: Patients were to receive intravenous gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour on Day 8 in an outpatient setting. The schedule was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were assessable for response and survival. One complete and 13 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval, 28-52%). The median time to disease progression was 2 months (range, 1-4 months). The median overall survival time was 10 months (range, 0-32 months). Toxicity was reported to be manageable. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel was found to be active in patients with carcinomas of an unknown primary site. However, the overall outcome of these patients remains poor and novel treatment approaches are required.     

低剂量持续静脉滴注吉西他滨一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

背景与目的:目前已将吉西他滨联合顺铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线化疗方案,吉西他滨的常规使用剂量和方法是1000mg/m2半小时静脉滴注,第1、8天,每3周为一个疗程。本研究旨在评价低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性。方法:48例经病理和/或细胞学检查确诊、未经化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,采用吉西他滨250mg/m2持续静脉滴注6h,第1、8天,顺铂75mg/m2,每3周为一疗程,连续使用2疗程以上。结果:48例患者中46例可评价疗效,所有患者可评价不良反应。完全缓解率2.2%,部分缓解率30.3%,总有效率为32.5%,中位治疗至进展时间为5.1个月,中位生存时间为10.2个月,1年生存率36.6%。白细胞减少发生率为60.4%,血小板减少发生率为39.5%,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度的白细胞和血小板减少发生率分别为20.8%和12.5%。结论:低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效确切、不良反应轻。     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and docetaxel are active agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma. A Phase II trial of this combination was performed to determine the activity and toxicity of these agents in a multiinstitutional setting in patients previously treated with one prior chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: Twenty-nine eligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma were treated with docetaxel at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) over 1 hour followed by gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), over 30 minutes, both intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1 and 8. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Five patients obtained an objective response for an overall response rate of 17% (90% confidence interval, 7-33%). One patient achieved a complete clinical response. The median overall survival of the group was 7.7 months. Toxicity was moderate with granulocytopenia, anorexia, and fatigue being the most commonly noted side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and docetaxel is an active second-line combination in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Responses in visceral, lymph node, and soft tissues sites were observed. Granulocytopenia without fever, fatigue, and anorexia was common. Thromboembolic symptoms were reported and are of concern. The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has the potential to palliate a subset of previously treated patients with an adequate performance status.     

Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) treated with either docetaxel plus gemcitabine or single-agent docetaxel. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG [n=157; gemcitabine 1100mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8], docetaxel 75mg/m(2) on day 8 or D [n=155; docetaxel 100mg/m(2) on day 1] every 3 weeks. A total of 312 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A predefined interim intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly longer median OS (p=0.037) in favor of the DG regimen (9.4 months versus 8.3 months for DG and D regimens, respectively), resulting in the premature termination of the study. The DG regimen was also associated with a significantly higher response rate compared to D (26.8% versus 11.6%, p<0.001). TTP were 3.5 and 2.3 months for the DG and D regimen, respectively (p=0.054). Although there were two treatment-related deaths in the DG arm, the toxicity profiles of the two regimens were comparable. The DG regimen was associated with a significantly better quality of life. The efficacy of the docetaxel plus gemcitabine combination is superior to single-agent docetaxel in chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Weekly combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for elderly patients and patients with poor performance status who have extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of a novel combination of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine for elderly patients and patients with poor performance status who had advanced-stage small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). METHODS: Previously untreated patients with advanced-stage SCLC were eligible for the current clinical trial. In addition, patients were required to be age > 65 years or to have poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2). All patients received 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 30 mg/m2 docetaxel intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15. Courses were repeated at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the current multicenter, community-based trial. Nine patients (23%) had partial responses to treatment. The median survival for the entire group was 4 months. Fourteen percent of patients were alive at 1 year. Myelosuppression was mild to moderate, with no episodes of neutropenia and fever. Grade 3/4 fatigue (25%) was the only common nonhematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively well tolerated, the weekly regimen of gemcitabine and docetaxel possessed only modest activity in this group of patients with unfavorable prognosis. The regimen offered no potential advantages over standard treatment approaches and is not recommended for further development.     

Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin in combination with docetaxel and gemcitabine in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Despite surgery, both locoregional and distant disease controls remain poor in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preoperative chemotherapy has become an accepted treatment but no established regimen exists. Our objective was to define the activity and feasibility of cisplatin in combination with docetaxel and gemcitabine in stage III NSCLC followed by surgery or radiotherapy. Thirty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC (59% stage IIIAN2, 41% stage IIIB) received cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 20 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients received induction chemotherapy (3 cycles) before re-evaluation, followed by thoracotomy or thoracic radiotherapy. Radiographic response was 50% and stable disease at computed tomography (CT) scan was observed in 30% of patients. Thirty patients were evaluable for response; thoracotomy was performed in 16 patients (53%) and resection was complete in 8 patients (27%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, the main hematologic toxicity, occurred in 53% of patients but only 3 patients required hospitalization due to neutropenic fever. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon. There were 3 treatment-related deaths. To date, 22% of patients remain alive and disease-free with a median follow-up of 13 months. Median survival for all recruited patients was 14 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 60%. The combination of cisplatin/docetaxel/gemcitabine is a welltolerated regimen. Although it has potential serious toxic effects, high response rates and manageable toxicity justify its use in further trials. The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) is currently performing a trial with this regimen in stage III disease.     

Weekly administration of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of gemcitabine plus docetaxel, both given on a weekly schedule, in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Heavily pretreated patients with MBC, aged 18-75 years with World Health Organization performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Three escalating weekly doses of docetaxel (30, 35 and 40 mg/m(2)) followed by a weekly fixed dose of gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included grade > 3 hematologic toxicity and grade > 2 stomatitis, asthenia, diarrhea or organ-specific toxicity (except alopecia). Dose escalation was stopped if > or = 3 of 5 patients at any dose level experienced DLT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (median age 56 years) received a mean of 4.1 (range 1-6) cycles. Asthenia, stomatitis and leukopenia were the main DLTs. One of 5 patients had DLT at dose level 1 and 2 of 5 patients at dose level 2. At dose level 3, 3 of 5 patients had DLTs. Three additional patients treated at dose level 3 confirmed that the MTD had been reached. Therefore, the recommended docetaxel dose in combination with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) for phase II studies was established at the next lower dose, 35 mg/m(2). Of 12 evaluable patients, 7 (58%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle is a safe regimen which shows activity in heavily pretreated patients with MBC. Further phase II investigations with this combination are now warranted.     

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine for previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy has been reported to be active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and myelosuppression is the most common dose-limiting toxicity. This prospective phase II study was designed to test the hypothesis that better tolerance and increased dose intensity might be achieved if patients are treated with weekly administration schedule. Thirty-five patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and a performance status 0-2 received first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel 35mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks, for up to 4 cycles. In total, 85 chemotherapy cycles were given (median, 2; range, 1-4). Other than the completion of all 4 planned cycles (n=6), the main reasons for treatment discontinuation were toxicity (n=15) and progressive disease (n=14). The most frequently encountered toxic effects were anemia (52% of patients), nausea and vomiting (60%), fatigue (71%) and anorexia (57%). One patient died of bilateral pneumonitis, which developed shortly after the administration of second cycle. Disease control (objective response and stable disease) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was achieved in 60% of patients and the overall response rate was 29% (95% CI, 14-44%). With a median follow-up duration of 13 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.8) months and 10.6 (95% CI, 7.0-14.3) months, respectively. In conclusion, weekly schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine has modest activity with acceptable toxicity profile in advanced NSCLC, but as high frequency of early discontinuation occurred does not merit further study with the present regimen.     

Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma

BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has demonstrated promise in sarcomas diagnosed in adults. In the current study, the toxicity and efficacy of this combination were evaluated in pediatric sarcomas. METHODS: A retrospective case review of 22 patients with recurrent or refractory bone or soft-tissue sarcomas who received gemcitabine (at a dose of 675 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (at a dose of 75-100 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 8) was undertaken. RESULTS: The patients (ages 8-23 years) received a total of 109 courses of chemotherapy (median, 4 courses; range, 1-13 courses). Seventeen patients had osteosarcoma, 2 patients had Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), 1 patient had a malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), 1 patient had a chondrosarcoma, and 1 patient had an undifferentiated sarcoma. Of the 14 patients evaluable for response, the patient with an MFH achieved a complete response (CR), 3 patients with osteosarcoma achieved a partial response (PR), and 2 patients (1 with ESFT and 1 with osteosarcoma) had stable disease (SD). The overall objective response (CR + PR) rate was 29%. Median duration of response (CR + PR + SD) was 4.8 months (range, 1.6-13 months). The toxicity was manageable and consisted primarily of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma and MFH. Further evaluation of this drug combination is warranted in these patients.     

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive,advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The goals of the current study were to determine the safety and efficacy of a nonplatinum-containing doublet, gemcitabine and docetaxel, in the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-naive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) administered on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival and 27 patients were evaluable for response. RESULTS: This combination was extremely well tolerated with Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 6 of 32 patients (19%) (grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). There were two episodes of Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and no episodes of Grade 3 or 4 anemia. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities included nausea (occurring in 1 of 32 patients), diarrhea (occurring in 1 of 32 patients), fatigue (occurring in 10 of 32 patients), fluid retention (occurring in 2 of 32 patients), anorexia (occurring in 4 of 32 patients), and transaminitis (occurring in 2 of 32 patients). Six patients experienced Grade 3 pneumonitis that was at least possibly related to the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. There was 1 complete response and 7 partial responses for an overall response rate of 30%. The 1-year and median survivals were 35% and 7.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the regimen of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) administered on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days was well tolerated with manageable hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. The responses were comparable to those achieved with platinum-based combination chemotherapy and the 2-year survival was an encouraging 19%. These data would support the further study of this nonplatinum doublet in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma using docetaxel and gemcitabine plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

BACKGROUND: A combination regimen comprised of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was studied in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) to determine its antitumor efficacy and tolerance. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with advanced measurable NSCLC (3 patients with Stage IIIB and 31 patients with Stage IV disease) were treated with an intravenous combination chemotherapy regimen comprised of docetaxel, 80 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), on Days 1 and 10; G-CSF, 5 microg/kg, was administered subcutaneously between Days 2 and 8. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response assessment. A total of 163 courses was administered. RESULTS: Objective tumor response was noted in 17 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval, 32. 5-67.5%), including 2 complete responses (6%) and 15 partial responses (44%). There was no change in 10 patients (29%) and 7 patients developed progressive disease. The median duration of response was 6.5 months (range, 3-15 months) and the median time to disease progression for all patients was 6.8 months (range, 1.8-18 months). The median overall survival time was 13.0 months (range, 2. 5-23+ months) with a 1-year survival rate of 55.8%. Myelosuppression was the most frequently encountered adverse reaction, although World Health Organization Grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia and/or granulocytopenia occurred in only 18% and 24% of patients, respectively. Other toxicities generally were mild to moderate, and always fully reversible. CONCLUSIONS: With a response rate of 50% and a median survival time of 13 months, the drug combination described in the current study appears to have significant activity against advanced metastatic NSCLC. Due to its fairly good tolerance and ease of administration, further investigation of this regimen appears warranted.     

Weekly docetaxel as second-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to previous anthracycline treatment

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel as treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer patients resistant to prior anthracycline chemotherapy. After the first 18 patients, the initial dose (40 mg/m2, 30-min i.v. infusion for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2-week rest) was reduced to 36 mg/m2 in the remaining 17 patients due to the incidence of toxicity (28% grade 3-4 asthenia). Overall response rate was 34% (95% CI, 19-50): two complete (6%) and ten partial responses (28%) were found. The median duration of response was 6.8 months, the median time to disease progression was 8.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.6 months (median follow-up of 11.4 months). Neutropenia was the only severe hematologic toxicity (17% of patients), whereas asthenia, nail, ocular and skin disorders were the most common nonhematologic toxicities. Only one death during further follow-up was related to toxicity (caused by pulmonary fibrosis). In conclusion, we found weekly docetaxel to be an active and safe chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast resistant to previous anthracyclines. This weekly regimen caused minimal myelosupression, while retaining significant activity against advanced breast cancer. Both factors provide attractive possibilities for the development of combination therapies incorporating weekly docetaxel. Nevertheless, the number of patients receiving either dose (40 and 36 mg/m2) which we studied is low and our results require confirmation on larger groups of patients.     

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combined with cetuximab in patients with progressive advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicenter phase 2 study

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a phase 2 trial of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with the gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in patients with documented progressive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Forty-five untreated patients with advanced-stage progressive HCC were prospectively enrolled. Treatment consisted of cetuximab at a dose of 400 mg/m2 initially then 250 mg/m2 weekly, plus gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 and oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on Day 2, every 2 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. RESULTS: Overall, 306 cycles were administered. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia (24%), neutropenia (20%), and anemia (4%). Grade 3 oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity occurred in 5 patients (11%) and grade 3 cutaneous toxicity in 7 patients (16%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The confirmed response rate was 20% and disease stabilization was obtained in 40% of patients. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 4.7 months and 9.5 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: In poor-prognosis patients with progressive advanced-stage HCC, the GEMOX-cetuximab combination appears to be active and to have manageable toxicity. A comparative randomized trial is now being planned.     

A phase II study of days 1 and 8 combination of docetaxel plus gemcitabine for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination consisting of second-line docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with progressive disease to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1, and adequate kidney, liver and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. over 60 min followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for a planned six cycles or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients enrolled, 50 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The mean age was 59 years (range 42-79), 46 male and 4 female. Histology subtypes were: adenocarcinoma 26 patients, bronchioloalveolar 1 patient, large cell carcinoma 5 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma 18 patients. Thirty-eight patients had ECOG PS 1 and 12 patients had PS 0. The median number of cycles administered was four (range 2-6). The overall response rate was 28%. The median follow-up was 9 months (range 5-34 months). The median survival time (MST) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4-12%), and the 1-year survival was 25%. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2-6%). In the Cox regression model, survival was only significantly affected by the PS. The median survival in patients with PS 0 was 17.8 months (95% CI, 18.8-21.8%) compared with a median survival for patients with PS 1 of 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2%) (P=0.0057). Toxicity: three patients had grade 3 anemia, three patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, four patients had grade 3 neutropenia and only one patient developed grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was also mild; the most frequent was asthenia, with grade 3 in eight patients (16%), and one patient with grade 4. CONCLUSION: This regimen of docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine in advanced second-line NSCLC is an active and safe regimen.     

Docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine plus rhG-CSF support as second-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine is an active front-line chemotherapy regimen against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acceptable toxicity. A multicenter phase II study was conducted in order to determine the toxicity and efficacy of this combination, as salvage treatment in patients progressing after a cisplatin-based front line regimens. PATIENTS and METHODS: Thirty-two patients with histologically confirmed, bidimensionally measurable NSCLC, who failed prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients' median age was 62.5 years, 29 (91%) were male, 23 (72%) had disease stage IV, and 22 (69%) had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. Gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) on day 8, after appropriate premedication. rhG-CSF (150 microg/m(2)) was given prophylactically from day 9 to 15. Treatment was repeated on an outpatient basis every three weeks. RESULTS: A total of 127 chemotherapy cycles were administered. In an intention-to-treat analysis five patients (15.6%; 95% CI: 3.04-28.21%) achieved a partial response, 11 (34.4%) stable disease, and 16 (50%) progressive disease. The median duration of response was 9 months, the median TTP 7 months, and the overall median survival 6.5 months; the overall 1-year survival probability was 27.6%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in five (15.6%) patients and in two of them associated with fever. Grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three (9%) and two (6.5%) patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity was very mild with only one episode of grade 4 diarrhea and mucositis, respectively; two (6%) patients complained for grade 3 asthenia. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel with prophylactic use of rhG-CSF is a safe and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, who failed front-line treatment with cisplatin-based regimens.