Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan

Recently, we have introduced robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in Japan. This article describes the details of a training program to shorten the learning curve in the absence of an urologist with expertise in robotic surgery. Five months after a 2-day training course of robotic surgery, RALP was first performed in Japan, and a total of 15 cases were performed in the subsequent 4 months. Our training program consisted of: (1) image training using surgical operation videos, (2) dry lab training using a sham pelvic cavity model, and (3) intraoperative mentoring. The operative procedure was divided into five consecutive stages, and time required to complete each stage was recorded. Robotic radical prostatectomy was completed in all patients without conversion to open surgery, except for the first patient in whom a restriction to a 2-h operation had been imposed by the ethics committee. The mean console time and the mean intraoperative blood loss (including urine) reduced from 264.2 min and 459.4 ml, respectively, in the first 11 cases, to 151 min and 133.3 ml, respectively, in the last three cases. With direct intraoperative guidance by the mentor during cases 13 and 14, the operation time was reduced at all five stages of the operative procedure. Our training program proved remarkably effective in reducing the learning curve of RALP in Japan, where there is no person with expertise in robotic surgery.     

Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre

OBJECTIVE: To present our 5-year experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), as LP has been shown to have similar success rates as open surgery, but standard LP requires high operative skills and a correspondingly long period of training, limiting its widespread availability, and RALP is easier and quicker to learn due to facilitated intracorporeal suturing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 92 patients had transperitoneal RALP for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) using the daVinci system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). A transperitoneal dismembered Anderson-Hynes procedure was used in all cases. Three robotic ports and one assistant port were used in all cases while a JJ stent was left indwelling for 6 weeks. Both primary PUJO (including horseshoe kidneys in 80 cases) and secondary (in 12 cases) were considered eligible. The follow-up included ultrasonography, excretory urography and renal scintigraphy. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 39.1 months; PUJO was successfully resolved in 89 patients (96.7%) while three required additional procedures. Haemorrhage into the collecting system and urine extravasation occurring early after surgery were the causes of failure. The mean (range) operative duration, including the set-up of the robot, was 108.34 (72-215) min; the mean duration of docking and surgery significantly decreased with experience (P < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 4.57 days. Split renal function improved from 37.6% to 41.9%. No cases of secondary PUJO were recorded during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RALP using the daVinci system is safe and effective, achieving similar long-term success rates to open surgery. The three-dimensional versatility of the robot enables the surgeon to recapitulate the open procedure. The results were durable with no cases of late complications, corroborating the accuracy of robot-assisted intracorporeal suturing and the subsequent quality of the pelvi-ureteric anastomosis. Moreover, the robotic approach was easy and quick to learn for both the surgical and the technical staff. Therefore, RALP is our preferred technique to treat PUJO.     

Robotic Surgical Education: a Collaborative Approach to Training Postgraduate Urologists and Endourology Fellows

Objective:

Currently, robotic training for inexperienced, practicing surgeons is primarily done vis-à-vis industry and/or society-sponsored day or weekend courses, with limited proctorship opportunities. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an extended-proctorship program at up to 32 months of follow-up.

Methods:

An extended-proctorship program for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was established at our institution. The curriculum consisted of 3 phases: (1) completing an Intuitive Surgical 2-day robotic training course with company representatives; (2) serving as assistant to a trained proctor on 5 to 6 cases; and (3) performing proctored cases up to 1 year until confidence was achieved. Participants were surveyed and asked to evaluate on a 5-point Likert scale their operative experience in robotics and satisfaction regarding their training

Results:

Nine of 9 participants are currently performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) independently. Graduates of our program have performed 477 RALP cases. The mean number of cases performed within phase 3 was 20.1 (range, 5 to 40) prior to independent practice. The program received a rating of 4.2/5 for effectiveness in teaching robotic surgery skills.

Conclusion:

Our robotic program, with extended proctoring, has led to an outstanding take-rate for disseminating robotic skills in a metropolitan community.     

机器人辅助完全后入路筋膜内前列腺癌根治术5例经验总结

目的简要介绍机器人辅助完全后入路筋膜内前列腺癌根治术的初步经验。方法回顾性分析浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院泌尿外科2016年8月至10月间5例机器人辅助完全后入路筋膜内前列腺癌根治术患者的临床资料。结果所有手术均顺利完成,手术时间为124~155分钟,平均(139.8±13.9)分钟;术中出血量30~80ml,平均(52.0±19.2)ml。无切缘阳性患者。术后6周复查PSA均达到根治标准。3例患者术后拔除导尿管后即能完全控尿,未使用尿垫,其余2例在术后1个月内控尿完全恢复。2例患者术后1个月内恢复勃起功能,其余3例随访1个月未见明显性功能恢复。结论机器人辅助完全后入路筋膜内前列腺癌根治术是可行的。患者的肿瘤控制、术后尿控以及性功能恢复均较为满意。有条件的单位可选择合适患者施行。     

Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The need for advanced laparoscopic skills limits the implementation of laparoscopic pyeloplasty to centers with extensive experience. The introduction of robotic technology into the field of minimally invasive surgery has facilitated complex surgical dissection and genitourinary reconstruction. We report our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty using the daVinci Surgical System at three New York City medical centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all robot-assisted laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty cases in 18 female and 17 male patients between April 2001 and January 2004 was performed. The average patient age was 39.0 years (range 15-69 years). All patients had symptoms or radiographic evidence of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. Robotic assistance with the daVinci Surgical System was employed after preparation of the UPJ with a standard laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: The mean operative time and suturing time was 216.4 +/- 52.9 minutes and 63.0 +/- 14.2 minutes, respectively. The average estimated blood loss was minimal at 73.9 +/- 58.3 mL. The mean length of hospitalization was 69.4 hours (range 28-310 hours). The average use of intravenous morphine was 28.4 mg (range 0-162 mg). There were no intraoperative complications or open conversions. A mean follow-up of 7.9 months revealed a success rate of 94%, with two patients requiring further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This combined multi-institutional series reveals that robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the daVinci Surgical System is safe and reproducible. These intermediate results appear comparable to those of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty repairs.     

Advances in robotic prostatectomy

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an important treatment option for localized prostate cancer. As such, methods to improve instrumentation, technique, outcomes, and cost require continued investigation. For example, a recently introduced four-armed robotic system has limited the need for bedside assistants, while an enhanced understanding of pelvic anatomy as visualized robotically has led to valuable modifications in operative technique. Increased surgeon experience has decreased perioperative morbidity, and has resulted in short-term pathologic and functional outcomes that compare favorably with open radical prostatectomy. Meanwhile, quality-of-life studies using validated instruments are helping to define the time course of patient recovery. Nevertheless, costs associated with robotic surgery remain daunting. As the follow-up of patients treated with RALP matures, future studies, ideally with a prospective, randomized design, will be needed to establish the long-term oncologic efficacy of the procedure and to evaluate the overall advantages of RALP compared with open surgery.     

Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum

Introduction

The clinical application of robotic surgery is increasing. The skills necessary to perform robotic surgery are unique from those required in open and laparoscopic surgery. A validated laparoscopic surgical skills curriculum (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery or FLS?) has transformed the way surgeons acquire laparoscopic skills. There is a need for a similar skills training and assessment tool for robotic surgery. Our research group previously developed and validated a robotic training curriculum in a virtual reality (VR) simulator. We hypothesized that novice robotic surgeons could achieve proficiency levels defined by more experienced robotic surgeons on the VR robotic curriculum, and that this would result in improved performance on the actual daVinci Surgical System?.

Methods

25 medical students with no prior robotic surgery experience were recruited. Prior to VR training, subjects performed 2 FLS tasks 3 times each (Peg Transfer, Intracorporeal Knot Tying) using the daVinci Surgical System? docked to a video trainer box. Task performance for the FLS tasks was scored objectively. Subjects then practiced on the VR simulator (daVinci Skills Simulator) until proficiency levels on all 5 tasks were achieved before completing a post-training assessment of the 2 FLS tasks on the daVinci Surgical System? in the video trainer box.

Results

All subjects to complete the study (1 dropped out) reached proficiency levels on all VR tasks in an average of 71 (± 21.7) attempts, accumulating 164.3 (± 55.7) minutes of console training time. There was a significant improvement in performance on the robotic FLS tasks following completion of the VR training curriculum.

Conclusions

Novice robotic surgeons are able to attain proficiency levels on a VR simulator. This leads to improved performance in the daVinci surgical platform on simulated tasks. Training to proficiency on a VR robotic surgery simulator is an efficient and viable method for acquiring robotic surgical skills.     

Installation of telerobotic surgery and initial experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of untrained laparoscopic surgeons to learn and implement laparoscopic telerobotic radical prostatectomy (TRP) using the daVinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, CA), and assess the education, safety and efficacy issues when instituting this system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2003 and October 2004, 122 consecutive TRPs were performed by two surgeons for clinically localized prostate cancer. The individual robotic surgeon was assisted at the bedside by another surgeon. The TRP was performed robotically by the surgeon at the remote console unit. Perioperative data and pathological results were recorded. The two surgeons spent 1 week in a skills laboratory using a porcine model of laparoscopic TRP, and then cadaveric robotic prostatectomy. The first six cases were mentored by an experienced telerobotic surgeon. RESULTS: The TRP was conducted by two surgeons with no previous laparoscopic experience. There were no conversions to open surgery. Assessing the complications, postoperative continence, operating time and transfusion rates showed equivalent efficacy and safety to open and pure laparoscopic methods. CONCLUSION: TRP represents a novel computer-based surgical approach to prostate cancer, which offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without the extensive experience associated with the laparoscopic method. It remains to be seen whether the robotic approach can deliver better outcomes in continence and potency over time.     

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients

ObjectiveRobotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is being increasingly utilized. To assess the efficacy of the operation, we compared apical and overall margin status for RALP with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in a group of contemporary patients.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive RRPs and then 94 RALPs from a single institution. Groups were analyzed and matched with regard to preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), cancer grade, pathologic stage, and tumor volume. Surgical margins were quantitated.ResultsClinicopathologic parameters were compared and additional high risk patients were observed in the RRP vs. RALP group. To risk-adjust these patient groups, those meeting preoperative high risk criteria were excluded from further positive margin analysis. Postoperatively, the average tumor volume was 13% in both groups. Pathologic stage pT3 was similar between RRP (14%) and RALP (11%). A positive surgical margin (PSM) was found in 12 cases (14%) after RRP and 11 cases (13%) after RALP including apical margins. Positive margins at the apex, non-apex, and both were statistically similar between groups.ConclusionsIn this study, no differences were seen between robotic prostatectomy with regard to apical or overall margin status compared with open prostatectomy in lower risk patients. This suggests that despite improved visualization, RALP generates a similar margin status as RRP.     

The “halo effect” in Korea: change in practice patterns since the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Acquisition of the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, USA) has enabled robot-assisted surgery to become an acceptable alternative to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Implementation of robotics at a single institution in Korea induced a gradual increase in the number of performances of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) to surgically treat localized prostate cancer. We analyzed the impact of robotic instrumentation on practice patterns among urologists and explain the change in value in ORP and RALP—the standard treatment and the new approach or innovation of robotic technology. The overall number of prostatectomies has increased over time because the number of RALPs has grown drastically whereas the number of OPRs did not decrease during the period of evaluation. Our experience emphasizes the potential of RALP to become the gold standard in the treatment of localized prostate cancer in various parts of the world.     

A selected review and personal experience with robotic prostatectomy: implications for adoption of this new technology in the United Kingdom

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is a rapidly evolving technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, cynics point to the increasing role of market forces in the robotic revolution. As yet, Europe has not taken up RALP in large numbers and this may in part relate to the high level of expertise in laparoscopy previously gained. Furthermore, setting up a robotic programme is a major undertaking for many surgical units. This review discusses some of the challenges in the development of a robotic service drawn from personal experience within the United Kingdom. Furthermore, available data on RALP versus open and laparoscopic approaches are reviewed for surgical and cancer-related outcomes. Preliminary data appear to show an advantage over open prostatectomy with reduced blood loss, decreased pain and early mobilisation and shorter hospital stay. Most intra-institutional studies demonstrate better postoperative continence and potency with RALP; however, this needs to be viewed in the context of a paucity of randomized data available in the literature. There is no definitive data to show an advantage over standard laparoscopic surgery, but the fact that this technique has reached parity with laparoscopy within 5 years is encouraging: with continued experience, the hope is that results will continue to improve.     

Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Advanced robotic surgery was first introduced into urology in 2000. The first studies showed the feasibility and safety of the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) telemanipulator assistance in radical prostatectomy, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, and radical cystectomy and neobladder formation. The miniature endowristed tools offer a potential advantage over standard laparoscopy in the accuracy of preparation and suturing. Other features are a three-dimensional vision system and unimpaired hand-eye coordination. Complex laparoscopic tasks are learned faster by using the robot, which may also explain the shorter training required for radical prostatectomy than for manual laparoscopy. This new and expensive technology has spread rapidly over the last 4 years. By 2004, approximately 10% of radical prostatectomies in the USA will be robot-assisted. Data on the functional and oncological outcomes are accruing but not yet conclusive. There will be a further spread of robotic surgery, routine telesurgery, smaller and more affordable systems, the introduction of virtual reality, all developments which have the potential to urological surgeons to improve.     

Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a complex procedure and has been standardized only during the last years. The remote controlled da Vinci Surgical System has opened up a new era in minimally invasive surgery. We here present our initial experience with the translation of open retropubic radical prostatectomy to laparoscopic technique using da Vinci and a one year follow-up. METHODS: After a period of technical development and training on cadavers, 40 consecutive patients eligible for radical prostatectomy were treated. After port placement, the urologist took control of the 3D 30 degrees laparoscope and the two instrument arms at the da Vinci remote console to perform bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, radical prostatovesiculectomy and urethrovesical anastomosis. RESULTS: The procedure was completed laparoscopically in all but two patients. Mean procedure time was 8.3 hours and mean intra-operative blood loss 570 ml. Learning curves associated with the use of the da Vinci Surgical System show that there is a 22-minute decrease in time required to perform the radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy for each case (p<0.0001). Patients recovered rapidly after surgery with early oncological and functional results that were similar to those obtained with our standard radical prostatectomy technique. CONCLUSIONS: Remote controlled robotic surgical systems are useful to translate open retropubic radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy. This new technology has the potential to equip the urologist with the microsurgical precision needed to preserve the delicate structural integrity of the pelvic floor in order to improve functional results without compromising the oncological outcome.     

Converting from open to robotic prostatectomy: Key concepts

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is rapidly becoming the surgical procedure of choice for treating localized prostate cancer. Although a learning curve does exist, RALP can readily be adopted by surgeons with minimal training in laparoscopy. Monitoring short- and long-term patient outcomes is the key to the individual surgeon improving this procedure for his/her patients. Although both open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and RALP can provide excellent patient outcomes, recent trends indicate that demand for RALP will continue to increase, and it is in the interest of the open surgeon to adopt this technique and aim to continuously improve patient outcomes after RALP.     

Robotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve

ObjectiveWe present the first cases of our robotic radical prostatectomy with Da Vinci (RRPdaV) that corresponds to the learning curve (LC) of the surgeon that has initiated with this technique.MethodsWe reviewed the first 20 patients that underwent RRPdaV, performed by an expert surgeon, without previous laparoscopic training, but with a wide experience in retropubic and perineal prostatectomy (HV). We analyzed: Surgical time, blood loss, conversion rate, intra and postoperative complications, hospital stay and days of bladder catheterization. Also: rates and location of surgical margins, as well as functional outcomes with an average follow up of 10 months.ResultsMean operating time was 140 minutes (100-211) and blood loss 180 mL (80-360), and none required a blood transfusion. There were no intraoperative complications and neither any conversion to open surgery. The only postoperative outstanding fact was mean hospital stay were 3,35 days. (3-5). We had 6 cases of positive surgical margins (30%). The most frequent location was postero-lateral. Eighteen out of 20 patients (90%) were early totally continent, 2 (10%) required the use of one pad during the first six months due slight stress incontinence that stopped spontaneously. From 20 cases, two of them (10%) had preoperative erectile dysfunction; 12 out of the remaining 18 (66.6%) preserved potency at review and 6 (33.4%) had postoperative erectile dysfunction.ConclusionsIt has been demonstrated that robotic surgery for radical prostatectomy is clearly an advantage technique (easy maneuver although it is a minimally invasive technique, comfortable and ergonomic position for the surgeon, 3D visualization and short learning curve). The RRPDAv learning curve is significantly shorter if the surgeon has a wide previous surgical experience in open and/or laparoscopic surgery.     

机器人单孔经膀胱入路前列腺癌根治术的护理配合

目的:总结机器人辅助单孔经膀胱入路前列腺癌根治术的手术护理配合经验。方法:选择7例行机器人辅助单孔经膀胱前列腺癌根治术的患者,对术前准备、术中配合和术后整理经验进行总结。结果:7例患者的手术均在全机器人辅助腹腔镜下完成,无中转开放,平均手术时间为2.5h,术中平均出血量为50ml,平均住院天数为5d。术后未放置腹腔引流管,无护理相关并发症,所有患者拔管后尿控良好。医护人员做到有效沟通、团队协作,将优质护理贯穿于整个围术期;洗手护士、巡回护士分工合作,保障了手术患者的安全。结论:对行机器人辅助单孔经膀胱入路前列腺癌根治术的患者进行的手术期护理可以提高手术效率,降低手术风险,缩短患者住院时间,值得进一步推广。     

Intraoperative multimodal analgesic bundle containing dexmedetomidine and ketorolac may improve analgesia after robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients receiving rectus sheath blocks

BackgroundMinimally invasive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has replaced open prostatectomy. However, RALP does not reduce postoperative pain compared to the open approach. We explored whether bundled intraoperative intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and ketorolac reduced opioid requirements during the 24 h after RALP.MethodsEighty patients (two parallel groups) were enrolled in this prospective non-randomized study from September 2020 to November 2020. All received preoperative rectus sheath blocks for analgesia after RALP. A multimodal analgesic bundle (dexmedetomidine and ketorolac) was administered intraoperatively in the study group (n = 39) but not in the control group (n = 40). The total postoperative opioid requirements (expressed in milligrams of intravenous morphine) and pain scores (derived using a visual analog scale) were compared between the two groups up to 24 h after surgery.ResultsThe two groups were demographically similar. During surgery, patients in the study group received less remifentanil and more ephedrine than controls. The study group required significantly less opioids during the 24 h after surgery (28.3 vs. 40.0 mg, p = 0.006). The between-group pain scores differed significantly at 1 and 6 h after surgery. All other postoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionsThe intraoperative multimodal analgesic bundle (intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketorolac) improved postoperative analgesia after RALP in patients with rectus sheath blocks, as evidenced by the opioid-sparing effect after surgery.