Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Deep sternal wound infection is a dreaded complication of coronary artery bypass surgery, particularly in patients with diabetes. This study determines whether skeletonization of internal thoracic artery conduits compared with pedicled harvesting reduces the risk of deep sternal wound infection in patients with diabetes undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively gathered data on all patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting and received bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts at our institution since 1990. We compared patients with diabetes who received skeletonized (n = 79) versus conventional pedicled (n = 36) internal thoracic artery conduits. RESULTS: The proportion of patients taking insulin (19.0% vs 14.0% for skeletonized vs conventional grafts, respectively, P =.6) or oral hypoglycemic agents (68.4% vs 69.4%, P =.9), as well as the prevalence of type I diabetes (2.5% vs 8.3%, P =.18), were similar in both groups. Patients who received skeletonized grafts were more likely to receive a free rather than an in situ right internal thoracic artery graft (93.7% vs 30.6%, P <.001). The prevalence of deep sternal wound infection was significantly lower in patients who received skeletonized grafts compared with patients who received conventional grafts (1.3% vs 11.1%, P =.03). Patients in the skeletonized group were also less likely to develop any (superficial or deep) sternal wound infection postoperatively (5.1% vs 22.2%, P =.03). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of deep sternal wound infection between patients with diabetes who received skeletonized internal thoracic arteries and patients without diabetes who underwent conventional internal thoracic artery grafting (n = 578) (1.2% vs 1.6%, respectively, P =.8). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization of internal thoracic artery conduits lowers the risk of deep sternal wound infection in patients with diabetes undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. We no longer consider diabetes a contraindication to bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, provided the internal thoracic arteries are skeletonized.     

Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts in patients with diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: Increased risk of deep sternal infections has prohibited routine bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients. The technique for harvesting the skeletonized internal thoracic artery provides the potential to minimize this risk. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of bypass grafting with bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arteries in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. METHODS: From May 1996 to April 1998, 231 consecutive diabetic and 534 nondiabetic patients underwent bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting. Mean age was 66 years. Compared with the nondiabetic group, the diabetic group comprised more women (29% vs 18%, P =.001), had a greater prevalence of hypertension (53% vs 44%, P =.019) and congestive heart failure (20% vs 14%, P =.016), but a lower prevalence of preoperative acute myocardial infarction (26% vs 34%, P =.027). RESULTS: Operative mortality of diabetic patients was comparable with that of nondiabetic patients (3% vs 2.6%). The two groups also had similar occurrences of deep sternal infection (2.6% vs 1.7%, respectively, P =.40). Deep sternal infection was significantly more prevalent in obese, diabetic women (3/20 = 15%) than in diabetic patients without this combination of risk factors (3/211 = 1.4%, P <.0001) (odds ratio 11.1, confidence interval 2.1-59.4). Diabetic patients also had a higher incidence of stroke (3.5% vs 0.9%, P =.014). Three-year actuarial survival of diabetic patients was lower (91.3% vs 94.7%, P =.083). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting is a good surgical revascularization option in diabetic patients. Operative mortality and prevalence of sternal infection are comparable with those of nondiabetic patients. However, the risk of sternal infection in obese diabetic women is high, and for them we advocate the use of a single artery instead of bilateral internal thoracic arteries.     

Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization

OBJECTIVE: Multiple strategies to achieve some degree of myocardial revascularization are available. In some, less complete revascularization is accepted to limit invasiveness. To examine the issues of incomplete revascularization, we assessed the long-term impact of additional non-left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses in patients undergoing only grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery. METHODS: A total of 2067 patients underwent primary isolated grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery from 1971 to 1997. Of these, 26% and 13% had 2- and 3-system disease, respectively. Multivariable analyses of survival and reintervention were performed in the hazard function domain for 27,683 patient-years of follow-up (mean 14 +/- 6.7). RESULTS: Survival was 99%, 88%, and 62% at 1, 10, and 20 years. Right coronary artery or left circumflex system disease of 50% or more (P =.02) and particularly high-grade (>/=70%) left circumflex (P =.01) and proximal right coronary artery disease (P =.01), as well as any degree of left main trunk stenosis (P <.0001), were associated with reduced long-term survival. Compared with 75% 20-year survival in patients with no non-left anterior descending disease, those with either left circumflex or left main trunk disease experienced a 44% survival, and those with proximal right coronary artery disease, 42%. The most common stated reason for incomplete revascularization was small vessel size. Freedom from reintervention was 89% and 65% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. High-grade left main trunk disease, but, in contrast, mid or distal disease of the right coronary artery, and not left circumflex disease, were risk factors for reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: These findings call into question the long-term appropriateness of interventions whose strategy includes leaving unrevascularized segments in territories not in the distribution of the left anterior descending coronary artery.     

Composite arterial grafting with double skeletonized internal thoracic arteries.

OBJECTIVES: Composite arterial grafting is a surgical technique for arterial myocardial revascularization, in which free arterial conduits are proximally anastomosed end-to-side to an intact internal thoracic artery (ITA). This report describes technical aspects and results of composite grafting using bilateral skeletonized ITAs. METHODS: From April 1996 to February 1999, 1057 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arteries. In 600 of them (57%), composite arterial grafting was performed. There were 452 men and 148 women. The mean age was 69 +/- 7 years. Two-hundred and six patients (34%) were diabetics, 84 (14%) had severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction of < 35%), and 26 (4.3%) underwent emergency operations. In 574 patients, the right ITA was used as a free graft connected to the in-situ left ITA. In 26, the free left ITA was attached to the in-situ right ITA, and in 38, mini-composite grafts (free distal left ITA on the left ITA, or free distal right ITA on the right ITA) were constructed. The average number of grafts was 3.0/patient (range, 2--6). RESULTS: The operative mortality was 2.8% (n = 17), and there were ten (1.7%), deep sternal wound infections. The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 14--36 months). The 3-year survival was 92.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the surviving patients were angina-free. CONCLUSIONS: We currently perform this surgery routinely in most patients referred for CABG, and regard bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arteries as the most appropriate arterial conduits for the composite technique.     

Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in 303 patients seventy years and older

OBJECTIVES: Higher patency rates of the internal thoracic artery have led myocardial revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic arteries to be a procedure designated primarily for young patients. Fewer leg wound complications and sternal collateral flow preservation with the skeletonizing dissection technique can make bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting attractive also for elderly patients. METHODS: Between May 1996 and May 1998, 303 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older (mean age 75.5 years; range 70-92 years) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with double skeletonized internal thoracic arteries. Forty-four (14.5%) patients were 80 years or older, and 89 (28%) had diabetes. The mean number of grafts was 3.1 per patient (2-6). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2.6% (n = 8): it was higher for octogenarians (6.8%) than for younger patients (1.9%) (P =.06). The only significant preoperative predictors of early mortality were complicated percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (P =.03) and preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pumping (P =.03). Six patients (2%) had sternal wound infections for which chronic lung disease (P =.02) and emergency operation (P =.006) were the only significant predictors. Twenty-two (7.2%) late deaths occurred, and 1- and 3-year survivals were 93% and 90%, respectively. The 3-year survival of patients 80 years old or older was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral grafting of the skeletonized internal thoracic artery carries relatively low morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and can be recommended for selected patients including octogenarians.     

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients: short-term and long-term results of a 515-patient series

BACKGROUND: Despite potential long-term benefits, bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetics remains controversial because of the risk of sternal infection. We sought to assess the short- and long-term outcome after left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting and to determine the configuration of choice in diabetic subsets. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2001, 515 diabetics underwent isolated left-sided skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. The outcome of 468 consecutive oral-treated diabetics and 47 selective insulin-treated patients was analyzed. Patients undergoing T-grafting were compared with those undergoing in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery arrangements. RESULTS: The respective rates for early mortality and sternal infections were 2.4% and 1.9% in oral-treated diabetics and 6.3% and 4.3% in insulin-treated diabetics. Multivariate correlates of sternal infection were chronic lung disease (odds ratio, 10), obesity (odds ratio, 7), reoperation (odds ratio, 22), and a creatinine level of 2 mg/dL or more (odds ratio, 8). Five-year survival was 82%. The T-graft (n = 437) and in situ (n = 162) subgroups had comparable baseline profiles. Freedom from cardiac mortality at 6.5 years was 95.6% and 87.6% (P =.277), and freedom from repeat revascularization was 91.5% and 92.7% (P =.860), respectively. The choice of bilateral internal thoracic artery configuration did not appear as a correlate of mortality, cardiac mortality, or major adverse cardiac events. Complementary right-sided gastroepiploic artery (hazard ratio, 0.36) and sequential (hazard ratio, 0.55) grafting were identified as protective factors against the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Routine skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting can be implemented safely in oral-treated diabetics. This strategy is associated with a favorable late cardiac outcome and is thus recommended. Both left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery configurations provide comparable short- and long-term outcomes.     

T grafts with the right internal thoracic artery to left internal thoracic artery versus the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: flow dynamics in the internal thoracic artery main stem.

OBJECTIVE: Complete arterial coronary artery bypass grafting with 2 grafts can be achieved even in triple vessel disease by use of a T configuration. There is still uncertainty whether the coronary flow reserve in the main stem of the left internal thoracic artery is sufficient to supply more than 1 anastomosed coronary vessel. METHODS: Between March 1996 and February 1999, 251 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent complete arterial revascularization with T grafts, using either the left internal thoracic artery with the free right internal thoracic artery graft (n = 73, group I) or the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery (n = 178, group II). A mean of 4.0 (group I) versus 4.3 (group II) coronary vessels were anastomosed per patient. One week (n = 92) and 6 months (n = 28) after the operation, flow was measured in the proximal left internal thoracic artery with a Doppler guide wire. Maximum flow was determined after injection of adenosine (30 microg). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality was 2.7% (group I) versus 2.3% (group II). At angiography (n = 142, 56.6%) the patency rate was 96.3% (group I) versus 98.2% (group II). There was no significant difference between baseline flow, maximum flow, and coronary flow reserve between the 2 groups. Coronary flow reserve increased in both groups within the first 6 postoperative months (group I, 1.85 +/- 0.31 vs 2.77 +/- 0.77, P =.0002; group II, 1.82 +/- 0.4 vs 2.53 +/- 0.73, P =.009). CONCLUSION: Both variants of T grafts allow for complete arterial revascularization with good perioperative results. The flow reserve of the proximal internal thoracic artery is adequate for multiple coronary anastomoses irrespective of the choice of the second arterial graft.     

Radial versus right internal thoracic artery as a second arterial conduit for coronary surgery: early and midterm outcomes

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare early and midterm clinical outcomes in patients receiving a right internal thoracic artery or a radial artery as the second arterial conduit for myocardial revascularization. METHODS: Data prospectively collected for all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery between April 1996 and May 2001 and who received both a left internal thoracic artery graft and either a right internal thoracic artery (n = 336) or a radial artery graft (n = 325) were analyzed. Patients in the radial artery group were older, with a greater body mass index, poorer ejection fraction, greater prevalence of diabetes, and higher New York Heart Association class than those in the right internal thoracic artery group. RESULTS: Odds ratios for perioperative myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, postoperative transfusion, and intensive care unit stay all showed a statistically significant benefit in the radial artery group compared with results in the right internal thoracic artery group (P 相似文献   

Revascularization of the lateral wall: long-term angiographic and clinical results of radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery grafting

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether the radial artery provides the same results as the right internal thoracic artery in lateral wall revascularization in the long term. METHODS: From January 1992 to September 1996, 288 patients had myocardial revascularization with the left internal thoracic artery anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery. The lateral wall was grafted with the radial artery in 139 patients (group A) and with the right internal thoracic artery in 149 patients (group B). Groups were different only because of older age and a higher incidence of patients requiring urgent treatment in group A. Y grafting was used in 86.4% of patients in group A and in 34.8% of patients in group B (P < .001). Anastomoses per patient were similar in both groups (3.2 +/- 0.8 vs 3.2 +/- 0.9, P = 1.000). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was similar (2.1% vs 2.0%, P = .722). There were 15 late deaths in group A versus 11 in group B (P = .418). Cause of death was cardiac related in 6 patients in group A versus 7 in group B. Late redo or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in 3 patients in group A and in 1 patient in group B (P = 0.538). Eight-year survival was 86.7% +/- 2.9% in group A versus 89.6% +/- 2.8% in group B (P = .477); event-free survival was 84.2% +/- 3.2% versus 88.9% +/- 2.9%, respectively (P = .430). The patency rate within 30 days was 99.1% in group A (105/106 left internal thoracic artery plus radial artery anastomoses) versus 100% in group B (52/52 bilateral internal thoracic artery anastomoses; P = .715). After a mean of 35 +/- 28 months, the patency rate was 99.0% in group A (100/101 left internal thoracic artery plus radial artery anastomoses) and 100% in group B (33/33 bilateral internal thoracic artery anastomoses, P = .560). CONCLUSION: In the long-term, lateral wall grafting with the radial artery provides the same clinical and angiographic results as right internal thoracic artery grafting.     

Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery.

OBJECTIVE: This study prospectively evaluates the effect on sternal vascularity of harvesting the left internal thoracic artery. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. One patient's procedure was altered during the operation, and he was eliminated from the study. The patients were prospectively randomized to receive a skeletonized internal thoracic artery (group I, n = 11) or a pedicled internal thoracic artery (group II, n = 12) graft. Each patient underwent a preoperative technetium 99 methylene diphosphonate bone scan using single photon emission computed tomography. The ratio of the mean counts per pixel on the left side of the sternum was compared with the mean counts per pixel on the right side. Postoperatively, all patients had a second scan, and sternal uptake was compared with the preoperative uptake. RESULTS: No significant differences in preoperative and operative variables were observed between the groups. A statistically significant reduction in blood flow to the left side of the sternum was shown postoperatively in group II compared with group I (0.61 +/- 0.11 vs 0.85 +/- 0.09; P <.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis of preoperative and operative variables revealed only a pedicled left internal thoracic artery to be associated with a 20% or more reduction in left-to-right sternal activity ratio (odds ratio, 100; 70% confidence limits, 22-465; P =.002). CONCLUSION: A pedicled left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery reduces blood flow to the left side of the sternum during the acute postoperative period. This does not occur when the left internal thoracic artery is skeletonized.     

Robotic skeletonizing of the internal thoracic artery: is it safe?

BACKGROUND: The advantages of internal thoracic artery skeletonization include early high blood flow, a longer conduit, and less bleeding than pedicle internal thoracic artery grafts. Longer conduits are needed for complete endoscopic arterial revascularization. Therefore this study was designed to determine the feasibility and safety of internal thoracic artery skeletonization using the da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). METHODS: Nine dogs underwent bilateral robotic internal thoracic artery harvesting through three ports placed in the left chest. One internal thoracic artery was harvested as a pedicle in each dog, and the other was skeletonized. Internal thoracic artery blood flow was measured in each graft, and comparative endothelial histologic studies were performed. Data are mean +/- the standard error of the mean. RESULTS: All 18 internal thoracic arteries were harvested successfully. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvests required more time (48.0 minutes +/- 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvests (39.0 minutes +/- 1.4; p < 0.05). Internal thoracic artery flows during the final intervals were similar (skeletonized = 30.0 mL/min +/- 2.4 vs pedicle = 31.5 mL/min +/- 1.8; p = 0.9). Free internal thoracic artery bleeding flow was similar in both groups (skeletonized = 162.0 mL/min +/- 3.0 vs pedicle = 189.0 mL/min +/- 2.4; p = 0.4). Histologically, both groups were similar with minimal endothelial damage. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically skeletonized harvesting is safe, but it requires more time (48.0 minutes +/- 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvesting. Despite muted tactile feedback with robotics, neither technique was associated with histologic or functional damage. These encouraging results may represent an advantage for complete arterial revascularization in robotic coronary bypass patients.     

Free right internal thoracic artery composite graft: an option in left anterior descending artery grafting?

Myocardial revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) decreases the risk of reinterventions and provides potential survival benefit. From May 1996 to April 2000, 1,057 patients underwent myocardial revascularization using skeletonized bilateral ITAs. A free right ITA as a composite graft was used for the left anterior descending artery grafting in 38 (3.6%) cases when the left ITA was not long enough to reach the left anterior descending artery. Operative mortality was 2.6% (1 patient). There was no observable reversible myocardial ischemia on the postoperative thallium single-photon emission computed tomography study. Myocardial revascularization with the use of a skeletonized free right ITA as a composite graft to the left anterior descending artery is an alternative option in cases when an in situ ITA cannot be used.     

Arterial myocardial revascularization with in situ crossover right internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery

BACKGROUND: The extra length obtained by skeletonizing the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) enables versatile use of in situ bilateral ITAs for coronary artery bypass grafting, as the longer skeletonized right ITA more easily reaches the anastomotic site on the left anterior descending coronary artery. METHODS: Between April 1996 and November 1999, 365 consecutive patients underwent revascularization with bilateral in situ ITAs (29% of 1,250 grafting procedures performed with both ITAs in our department during this period). The right ITA was routed anterior to the aorta to graft the left anterior descending coronary artery, and the in situ left ITA was used to graft circumflex branches. Right coronary artery branches were grafted with right gastroepiploic artery or saphenous vein graft. The right ITA crossed the midline above the aorta at the most cranial point to avoid damage in case of a repeat sternotomy in the future. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 2.2% (8 patients). Postoperative morbidity included seven strokes (1.9%), eight sternal wound infections (2.2%), and four perioperative myocardial infarctions (1.1%). Follow-up (6 to 49 months) of 97% of hospital survivors showed a return of angina in 3%. Postoperative coronary angiography (22 patients) revealed a 95% patency rate of both ITAs. One-year and 4-year survival rates (Kaplan-Meier) were 95% and 92.4%, respectively. Important predictors of an early unfavorable event were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, old age (> or = 70 years), emergency operation, and diabetes. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the only independent predictor of sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 15; 95% confidence interval, 2.8 to 80). It also predicted decreased late survival (hazard ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 3 to 21.5). CONCLUSIONS: With skeletonized dissection of ITAs, the right ITA easily reaches the left anterior descending coronary artery for left-sided arterial revascularization with in situ bilateral ITAs. This procedure is safe, but we recommend avoiding its use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.     

Composite arterial grafts versus conventional grafting for coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES: Composite arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery allow complete arterial revascularization but are limited by the inflow of a single internal thoracic artery supplying all the grafted vessels. We reviewed the safety of composite arterial grafts using either bilateral internal thoracic arteries or a single internal thoracic artery and radial artery. METHODS: From January 1999 to July 2002, 402 consecutive patients receiving composite grafts only were compared to a control group of patients (n = 542) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with internal thoracic artery and saphenous veins operated upon by the same surgeons. Two different statistical approaches were used to compare groups in this retrospective analysis. First, propensity score analysis with greedy matching technique was used to match patients from each group. Second, a multivariate analysis was performed looking at a combined patient outcome of death, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation utilization, myocardial infarction, stroke, and prolonged ventilation on all patients in both groups. RESULTS: After matching by propensity score, the major clinical outcomes in composite arterial (n = 249) and control (n = 249) groups were found to be similar. The in-hospital mortality in the composite group was 1.2% as compared with 0.4% in matched patients (P =.62). However, patients in the composite group were found to have a significantly longer pump time (P <.0001), longer clamp time (P <.0001), increased incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (12.8% vs 4.8%; P =.002), and higher incidence of combined morbidity outcome (13.6% vs 6.4%; P =.007) as compared with matched patients. Multivariable analysis showed that composite arterial grafting was an independent predictor of the combined morbidity outcome with an odds ratio of 2.1 (1.2-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that composite arterial grafting may be associated with an increase in risk-adjusted patient morbidity when compared with a conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group, although a mortality difference was not demonstrable.     

Early and mid-term results of all arterial graft coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic and radial arterial conduits

From March 1996 to May 2000, 41 patients [age 39-78 (mean 63.5 +/- 8.8) years, 90.2% male] underwent all arterial multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral internal thoracic (BiITA) and radial (RA) arterial conduits. The reason for using RA was that the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) was small or occluded on preoperative angiography, a history of upper abdominal surgery or disease, or the right coronary arterial lesion was proximal and mild. The BiITA were used as in situ grafts and the proximal anastomosis of RA was to the ascending aorta in all cases. All patients underwent conventional elective CABG with median sternotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean number of anastomoses was 3.3 +/- 0.5 branches and complete revascularization rate was 80.5%. Postoperative follow-up averaged 20 months and the longest was 50 months. There was no early death, and overall graft patency 2-3 weeks after surgery was 96.2% (LITA 94.0%, RITA 97.6%, RA 97.6%). Four-year actuarial survival rate was 96.4 +/- 3.5% (1 patient: 9 months, no cardiac death), and cardiac event-free rate after surgery was 89.7 +/- 4.9% [4 patients: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)]. However, once patients were discharged from hospital, cardiac event-free rate was 100%. These excellent results suggest that all arterial graft CABG was satisfactory, and RA can be used as a third suitable arterial bypass conduit, if RGEA cannot be used or is unsuitable for use.     

Early vasoreactive profile of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts

BACKGROUND: No data are available on the early vasoreactive profile of skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to receive a skeletonized or pedicled internal thoracic artery graft. On the second postoperative day all patients were subjected to follow-up angiography and endovascular infusion of serotonin, acetylcholine, and isosorbide dinitrate. RESULTS: Internal thoracic artery grafts were widely patent in all cases. Mean diameters of the internal thoracic artery were 1.95 +/- 0.17 mm in the pedicled group and 2.26 +/- 0.40 mm in the skeletonized group. After serotonin challenge, mean internal thoracic artery diameters were reduced to 1.44 +/- 0.34 mm and 1.64 +/- 0.14 mm, respectively; acetylcholine challenge lead to a moderate degree of vasoconstriction (1.55 +/- 0.59 mm in the pedicled group and 1.84 +/- 0.15 mm in the skeletonized group). No statistically significant difference was evident between the two groups at any step. CONCLUSION: Skeletonization does not affect the early vasoreactive profile of internal thoracic artery grafts used for surgical myocardial revascularization.     

In situ bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arterial grafting for left-side myocardial revascularization using an off-pump technique

The aim of this study was to review the clinical and angiographic outcomes of in situ skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting for left coronary arterial revascularization using an off-pump technique in 144 consecutive patients. We also assessed the difference between left and right ITA grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Arrangement of the bilateral ITAs (grafting of the left/right ITA to the LAD) was decided according to the coronary anatomy and quality of the grafts. Early postoperative angiograms were evaluated in 110 patients. The average numbers of anastomoses and bilateral ITA anastomoses per patient were 3.4 and 2.3, respectively. There were no surgical deaths or sternal infection. The left and right ITA were anastomosed to the LAD in 106 (73.6%) and 38 (26.4%) patients, respectively. There were no differences in preoperative conditions and postoperative complications between the left ITA and right ITA to LAD groups. The patencies of the left and right ITAs were 99.1 and 100%, respectively. In situ skeletonized bilateral ITA grafting for left-side revascularization using an off-pump technique was shown to be feasible, producing excellent early clinical and angiographic outcomes. Furthermore, arrangement of bilateral ITAs did not affect outcomes.     

In the current era, complete revascularization improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization has been the standard for coronary bypass grafting. However, surgical intervention has evolved with increasing use of arterial conduits and off-pump techniques. METHODS: Patients undergoing non-redo bypass surgery from January 1998 through December 2000 were followed up with questionnaires and telephone contact. Incomplete revascularization was defined as absence of bypass grafts placed to a coronary territory supplied by a vessel with 50% or greater stenosis. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-four patients were followed for a mean of 3.3 +/- 1.6 years. Complete revascularization was found in 937 (90.6%) patients, and incomplete revascularization was found in 97 (9.4%) patients. Eight hundred twenty-seven (80.4%) patients underwent on-pump operations, and 207 (19.6%) underwent off-pump operations. Incomplete revascularization was more prevalent in off-pump versus on-pump operations (21.7% vs 6.3%, P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that in-hospital cerebrovascular accidents (hazard ratio, 5.49; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.97; P = .019), and incomplete revascularization (hazard ratio, 1.85; P = .040) predicted an increased hazard (risk) of cardiac death. Left internal thoracic artery (hazard ratio, 0.38; P = .047), right internal thoracic artery (hazard ratio, 0.25; P = .019), and radial artery (hazard ratio, 0.36; P < .001) grafting reduced the risk of cardiac death. The 5-year unadjusted survival rate was 52.6% versus 82.4% in patients undergoing incomplete and complete revascularization ( P < .001), with cardiac survival rates of 74.5% versus 93.1%, respectively ( P < .001). However, this difference in cardiac survival was smaller in octogenarians with incomplete versus complete revascularizations (77.4% vs 87.6%, P = .101) and was essentially absent in off-pump versus on-pump operations if complete revascularization was achieved in both cases (93.6% vs 93.1%, P > .200). CONCLUSIONS: Complete revascularization and arterial grafting improve 5-year survival. Off-pump techniques do not affect survival. Complete revascularization should be performed whenever possible.     

Extending the in situ right internal mammary artery graft with retrocaval positioning

Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting is associated with improved long-term patient outcomes. In situ right internal mammary artery grafting of the obtuse marginal artery, through the transverse sinus, is often limited by conduit length. We describe the technique of retrocaval positioning of the right internal mammary artery graft to extend its functional length for grafting of the circumflex territory. With careful surgical technique, this procedure can be performed safely during routine coronary bypass operations.     

Inferior epigastric artery as a conduit for myocardial revascularization: a two-year clinical and angiographic follow-up

The inferior epigastric artery has been proposed as a suitable conduit for myocardial revascularization but its mid-term patency rate has not been assessed. A prospective clinical and angiographic study on the use of the inferior epigastric artery as an additional arterial conduit together with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was conducted in 38 patients. No deaths or major postoperative complications occurred. Twenty-three patients underwent repeat angiography after an average of 21.2 months. The left and right internal thoracic artery grafts patency rate was 95.6% (44/46), while inferior epigastric artery patency rate was 52.2% (12/23). By relating patency to the grafted coronary branch, the following results were obtained: 100% for the left anterior descending (3/3), right coronary (1/1) and ramus medianus (1/1); 40% (4/10) and 37.5% (3/8) for diagonals and obtuse marginals respectively. The low patency rates observed when the inferior epigastric artery is used on diagonals and obtuse marginals indicate that this vessel cannot be considered a suitable conduit for extensive application of arterial revascularization. We suggest that the inferior epigastric artery should only be used in patients presenting with contraindications to bilateral internal thoracic artery or right gastroepiploic artery grafting, or exhibiting unsuitable saphenous veins.