简化腋窝淋巴结清扫术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的应用

目的探讨简化腋窝淋巴结清扫术(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND)在乳腺癌手术中的应用及效果。方法分析2009年1月至2013年6月间行前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)327例乳腺癌患者的临床资料,行亚甲蓝染色法SLNB后根据前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)冰冻病理结果,对SLN阳性者行规范的ALND,SLN阴性则行简化的ALND(只清扫LevelⅠ),比较两组在手术时间、术后住院时间、腋窝引流时间及术后并发症的差异。结果 327例患者中,314例成功进行了SLNB,119例SLN阳性者行标准的ALND,195例SLN阴性者行简化的ALND,11例SLN阴性患者出现LevelⅠ组织淋巴结转移;简化组手术时间、术后住院时间、腋窝引流时间明显缩短,术后腋窝积液、肌力减退、活动受限、疼痛、麻木、肿胀等并发症明显减少。术后随访3~60个月,患者无腋窝淋巴结复发及远处转移。结论蓝染法SLNB是乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移状态的重要检测技术,对SLN阴性行简化的ALND,可节省医疗资源、减少术后并发症。     

前哨淋巴结活检术在早期乳腺癌保乳术中的应用

目的探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（sentinellymph node biopsy,SLNB）在早期乳腺癌保乳术中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析56例pT1.2N0M0期乳腺癌行保乳术＋前哨淋巴结活检术的临床资料。56例SLN阴性,未行腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection,ALND）。术后辅以化疗、放疗,激素受体阳性患者行内分泌治疗。结果56例成功施行保乳手术,保乳术后双乳对称。SLNB替代ALND者各项术后并发症少。中位随访时间36个月（1～72个月）,1例发现局部复发,行乳腺癌改良根治术时发现腋窝淋巴结转移;1例发现腋窝淋巴结复发转移。结论SLNB可以缩小手术范围,减少术后并发症,保留腋窝形态,提高保乳质量。     

前哨淋巴结活检指导乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫的研究进展

腋窝淋巴结清扫（axillary lymph node dissection,ALND）对降低乳腺癌患者的复发转移率、延长乳腺癌患者生存期具有重要意义,临床上绝大部分前哨淋巴结活检（sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB）结果阳性的乳腺癌患者均接受ALND。但现有研究显示,部分前哨淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者并没有因ALND而取得生存获益,这就引发了对于SLNB阳性的乳腺癌患者是否必须行ALND问题的思考。本文就近年来SLNB指导乳腺癌患者ALND相关研究的新进展进行综述。     

早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检在简化腋清扫中的应用研究

[目的]探讨早期乳腺癌患者行前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）为阴性,行简化腋窝淋巴结清扫替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术（ALND）的临床效果。[方法]采用1%亚甲蓝染色法对65例早期乳腺癌患者行SLNB,60例成功行SLNB,其中40例SLN无转移者行简化腋窝淋巴结清扫术（简化组）;20例SLN有转移者行ALND（标准组）,比较两组患者术后上肢并发症的发生情况、腋窝复发及全身转移情况。[结果]简化组手术时间和腋窝引流时间比标准组明显缩短,有统计学差异（P〈0.01）;简化组术后患侧上肢的疼痛、肿胀、麻木症状明显较标准组少（P〈0.01）。两组生存曲线没有差异。[结论]亚甲蓝染色法能够比较准确地定位乳腺癌的前哨淋巴结。简化ALND替代ALND手术时间和术后引流时间缩短,方便可行,并发症明显减少,腋窝复发率低,是早期乳腺癌患者的安全分期手术。     

乳腺癌哨兵淋巴结活检临床应用价值的研究

腋窝淋巴结清除是乳腺癌常规术式的重要组成部分。腋窝淋巴结转移状态对正确分期、判断预后和指导治疗具有重要的临床意义。但全腋窝淋巴结清除术(axillary lymph node dissection，ALND)也可引起许多并发症，如上肢无力、淋巴水肿等。随着肿瘤生物学特征的研究及诊断技术的提高，早期乳腺癌的检出率日渐增多，许多学者对早期乳腺癌行常规ALND的必要性提出了质疑，并试图用哨兵淋巴结活检(sentiel lymphnode biopsy，SLNB)来取代常规ALND。     

前哨淋巴结活组织检查指导乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫问题的思考

乳腺癌是危及女性生命健康最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。近年来,发展中国家乳腺癌的发病率居高不下,中国乳腺癌发病率每年增长约3%,其中京、津、沪等经济发达地区,乳腺癌已跃居女性恶性肿瘤之首[1]。准确的临床分期尤其是腋窝转移淋巴结分级对评估患者预后和制定治疗方案具有重要参考价值,研究发现有腋窝淋巴结侵犯的乳腺癌患者5年无瘤生存率相对于无腋窝淋巴结转移患者下降40%[2]。以前临床上评价腋窝淋巴结转移情况主要依靠腋窝淋巴结清扫（ axillary lymph node dissection, ALND）,致使绝大多数乳腺癌患者均接受了腋窝淋巴结清扫。自从20世纪90年代前哨淋巴结活组织检查（ sentinel lymph node biopsy, SLNB）首次应用于乳腺癌手术以来, SLNB逐渐改变了上述状况,使得SLNB阴性的乳腺癌患者避免接受ALND,SLNB现已成为决定患者是否需要进行ALND的主要依据[3]。近年来,临床研究结果提示部分SLNB阳性的乳腺癌患者即使不接受 ALND,其预后也不会因此受到影响[4],这引起了学者对SLNB 阳性乳腺癌患者是否一定要行ALND问题的思考。笔者就近年来有关SLNB指导腋窝淋巴结切除的研究成果进行总结,并展望SLNB在未来临床实践过程中的指导作用。     

前哨淋巴结活检术在早期乳腺癌保腋窝治疗中的应用

目的：探讨乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术（sentonel lymph node biopsy,SLNB）对SLN阴性者进行保腋窝的可行性。方法：联合应用专利蓝（patent blue-v）和^99mTc标记的硫胶体（^99mTc-Sulphur colloid,^99mTc-Sc）行乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术。对SLN阴性并同意保腋窝者免除腋窝淋巴结清扫（axillary lymph node dissection,ALND）,对SLN阳性或虽SLN阴性但不同意保腋窝者仍行ALND。结果：2002年3月～2006年3月入组临床分期T1～2N0M0乳腺癌患者135例,均行SLNB。SLN阳性44例,其中42例行ALND,2例镜下有微小转移灶者仅行SLNB术后加腋窝淋巴结区域放疗;SLN阴性91例（67.4%）,其中的39例仅行SLNB,52例仍行ALND。全组SLNB准确率97.8%（132/135）,假阴性率6.8%（3/44）。全组中位随访43个月（24～72个月）,SLNB保腋窝者术后并发症明显低于ALND者（P〈0.05）,区域淋巴结无复发,ALND者区域淋巴结亦无复发。结论：SLNB保腋窝近期疗效满意具有良好的微创效果。     

48例早期乳腺癌仅行前哨淋巴结活检术的疗效观察

目的探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（SLNB）替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术（ALND）在早期乳腺癌中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院行SLNB的48例早期乳腺癌患者的临床和病理资料,并与同期73例SLN阴性行ALND患者进行对比,比较两组患者的远期疗效及术后并发症情况。结果中位随访26月（2～40月）,SLNB组有1例患者于术后14月出现同侧腋窝淋巴结复发,ALND组有1例患者于术后33月出现同侧锁骨上淋巴结转移,两组淋巴结转移率分别为2.1%（1/48）和1.4%（1/73）,差异无统计学意义（P=1.000）;至随访结束,两组均未见远处转移及肿瘤所致死亡病例,总生存率均为100%。SLNB组和ALND组术后平均住院时间分别为5天（2~10天）和9天(5~16天)（P=0.004）,手术后6月时,两组患肢感觉异常发生率分别为4.2%（2/48）和71.2%(52/73)（P=0.000）,患肢水肿发生率分别为0和13.7%(10/73) （P=0.003）,差异均具有统计学意义。结论在SLN阴性早期乳腺癌中,仅行SLNB腋窝淋巴结复发率低,SLNB可以与取得ALND相同的疗效;同时,SLNB与ALND相比手术创伤小,术后并发症少。     

前哨淋巴结活检在早期乳腺癌患者腋窝管理中的研究进展

传统的观点认为腋窝淋巴结清扫(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND)是前哨淋巴结(sentinellymph node,SLN)阳性乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法,而ALND容易引起上肢水肿、功能障碍等术后并发症,影响患者生活质量.近几年研究显示,对于SLN阳性的早期乳腺癌,并非所有患者都需...     

ACOSOG Z0011试验标准用于中国前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者以避免腋窝淋巴结清扫的可行性研究

背景与目的:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组(American College of Surgeons Oncology Group,ACOSOG)Z0011试验的结果改变了乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)阳性患者的传统治疗模式。本研究的目的在于探讨ACOSOG Z0011试验标准用于中国前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者以避免腋窝淋巴结清扫(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND)的可行性。方法:连续收集194例SLN阳性的乳腺癌患者,根据Z0011的标准分为可以只做前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)组和仍需做ALND组。将SLNB组患者的临床病理学特征与Z0011试验标准的原始入组人群进行比较,再将SLNB组与ALND组患者的临床病理学特征进行比较。结果:194例患者中有77例符合Z0011标准可以只做SLNB,117例患者不符合Z0011标准,需要做ALND;SLNB组患者与Z0011标准原始入组人群比较,T1期肿瘤、ER阳性肿瘤、淋巴结转移数目少的肿瘤、非前哨淋巴结(non-sentinel lymph node,NSLN)阴性的肿瘤都显著多于Z0011标准原始人群,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。本研究ALND组患者与SLNB组患者比较,T2、T3期肿瘤较多,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ALND组腋窝淋巴结转移数目多的患者比例要明显多于SLNB组,NSLN阳性患者比例也高于SLNB组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:将Z0011试验标准用于SLN阳性乳腺癌患者,能够筛选出较Z0011标准研究中预后更好、更为低危的患者,使得该部分患者可以更为安全的只接受SLNB。     

Comparing Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis with and without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is used in cases with palpable axillary lymph nodes or positive SLNB cases. The aim of this review was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched using the key words of “breast cancer”, “axillary lymph node dissection”, and “sentinel lymph node dissection”. In addition, other sources were searched for ongoing studies (i.e., clinicaltrials.gov). The clinical trials were evaluated based on the Jadad quality criteria, and cohort studies were evaluated according to the STROBE criteria. At the end of the search, the articles were screened independently by two reviewers to check their eligibility to be included in the study. Afterwards, the data were extracted independently by two researchers. Results: After searching the databases, 169 papers were retrieved. However, after removing the duplicates and studying the titles and abstracts of these papers, only ten ones underwent further investigation. After reading full-text of each article, four studies were finalized. Following a manual search, 27 papers were entered into the study for the final evaluation, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings showed no significant differences in OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND. Conclusion: The findings did not confirm that ALND improved OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in patients who were clinically node-negative and positive SLNB.     

乳腺癌前哨体淋巴结活检的研究

前哨淋巴结(SLN)的概念和前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的应用是在1977年被提出的,但由于当时淋巴结检测设备和技术尚不先进,使SLN的研究未能得到足够的重视.乳腺癌SLNB是在20世纪90年代兴起的,现已成为乳腺癌外科领域的研究热点,有望在早期乳腺癌治疗中取代常规的腋窝淋巴结解剖(ALND),降低上肢淋巴水肿和功能障碍的发生率.我国该项目研究起步较晚,目前已逐渐成为人们关注的热点.该项目还将继续进行多中心、大样本、前瞻性研究,最终达成共识,将给乳腺癌病人带来福音.     

乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的临床意义

目的探讨新辅助化疗后乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性。方法对57例行^99Tc联合亚甲蓝示踪前哨淋巴结活检术和腋窝淋巴结清扫术乳腺癌患者的资料进行分析,其中31例ⅡB、Ⅲ期患者先行2～3个疗程新辅助化疗后再行前哨淋巴结活检及腋窝淋巴结清扫术,另26例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期患者直接行前哨淋巴结活检及腋窝淋巴结清扫术。结果新辅助化疗组和非新辅助化疗组平均腋窝淋巴结数、前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node,SLN）数、SLN检出率、SLN假阴性率均无显著差异（P均〉0．05）。新辅助化疗纽化疗前临床分期在N2以上者,SLN检出率均显著下降（P〈0．05）。结论新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检能准确预测腋窝淋巴结的状况。化疗前的N分期是SLNB检出率的影响因素。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients With Pathological Complete Response in the Axillary Lymph Node After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PurposeSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial in patients with breast cancer who are initially lymph node-positive. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients who converted from lymph node-positive to pathological node-negative (ypN0) after NAC.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 223 patients who converted to axillary lymph node-negative status after NAC and underwent breast and axillary surgery between January 2006 and December 2015. This study compared the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), ipsilateral axillary lymph node recurrence rates and incidence of postoperative complications, especially, arm lymphedema and shoulder stiffness between SLNB and ALND.ResultsThis study included 223 patients with axillary pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC and surgery. The SLNB and ALND groups included 94 and 129 patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 57 (range, 6–155) in the SLNB group and 99 (range 2–159) months in the ALND group. The corresponding 5-year OS and DFS rates were 96.3% and 94.2% (p = 0.392), and 89.2% and 86.4% (p = 0.671), respectively. Four patients (4.3%) in the SLNB group and nine (7.0%) in the ALND group developed locoregional recurrences. Ipsilateral axillary lymph node recurrence and distant metastasis were observed in one (1.1%) and three (2.3%) patients, and in 10 (10.6%) and 11 (8.5%) patients, respectively. Patients in the ALND group were more likely than their SLNB counterparts to experience complications, such as shoulder stiffness (9 [7.0%] vs. 4 [4.3%] patients, p = 0.57). The rate of lymphedema in the ALND group was three times that in the SLNB group (35 [27.1%] vs. 8 [8.5%] patients, p < 0.001).ConclusionAs an alternative to ALND, SLNB has oncological safety in patients with axillary pathological complete response after NAC.     

Role of FDG PET-CT in evaluation of locoregional nodal disease for initial staging of breast cancer

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is not indicated or recommended in the initial staging of early breast cancer. Although it is valuable for detecting distant metastasis, providing prognostic information, identifying recurrence and evaluating response to chemotherapy, the role of FDG PET/CT in evaluating locoregional nodal status for initial staging of breast cancer has not yet been well-defined in clinical practice. FDG PET/CT has high specificity but compromised sensitivity for identifying axillary nodal disease in breast cancer. Positive axillary FDG PET/CT is a good predictor of axillary disease and correlates well with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG PET/CT may help to identify patients with high axillary lymph node burden who could then move directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and would not require the additional step of SLNB. However, FDG PET/CT cannot replace SLNB or ALND due to unsatisfactory sensitivity. The spatial resolution of PET instruments precludes the detection of small nodal metastases. Although there is still disagreement regarding the management of internal mammary node (IMN) disease in breast cancer, it is known that IMN involvement is of prognostic significance, and IMN metastasis has been associated with higher rates of distant metastasis and lower overall survival rates. Limited clinical observations suggested that FDG PET/CT has advantages over conventional modalities in detecting and uncovering occult extra-axillary especially IMN lesions with upstaging the disease and an impact on the adjuvant management.     

美蓝在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的临床价值

目的探讨美蓝在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的临床价值。方法将1%美蓝2ml注入活检腔外上方的皮下及乳腺组织内,然后行Auchincloss仿根治术,依淋巴管走向找到蓝染淋巴结定为SLN,若此时未找到待腋窝清扫结束后,再在标本中寻找,蓝染者为SLN,余为非SLN,分别送病理检查。结果前哨淋巴结检出率为87.9%(95/108),SLN预测腋窝状况的准确率为95.7%(91/95),假阴性率为6.5%(4/62),无假阳性者。未检出者13例,其中4例为假阴性,均属跳跃式转移。前哨淋巴结转移阳性率(34.6%,33/95)和阴性率(65.3%,62/95),与全腋淋巴结转移阳性率(39.8%,43/108)和阴性率(60.2%,65/108)比较,均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论美蓝前哨淋巴结活检可以准确预测乳腺癌患者的腋淋巴结状态。     

核素标记法联合亚甲蓝在早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用价值

[目的]探讨核素标记法联合亚甲蓝在早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的临床应用价值。[方法]对65例临床确诊的早期乳腺癌患者联合应用99mTc-硫胶体和亚甲蓝标记法进行前哨淋巴结活检,并行腋淋巴结清扫术。[结果]前哨淋巴结活检成功率为100.00%,准确率98.46%,假阴性率6.25%。[结论]核素标记和亚甲蓝联合定位法在前哨淋巴结活检中具有明确的实用性,能有效预测早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移状况。