卡培他滨联合多西他赛或长春瑞滨一线解救治疗晚期乳腺癌的效果观察

目的 评价卡培他滨联合多西他赛或长春瑞滨的两药方案对蒽环类或蒽环类联合紫杉醇辅助治疗耐药的晚期乳腺癌患者的疗效和不良反应.方法 2010年6月至2013年6月收治的女性乳腺癌患者65例,给予卡培他滨联合多西他赛（TX方案）和（或）卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨（NX方案）化疗,分析患者的疗效和生存情况.结果 35例患者接受TX方案化疗,30例患者接受NX方案化疗.全部患者中位随访时间为18个月（2～39个月）,中位无进展生存（PFS）为6.8个月（95％CI6.1 ～7.6个月）;中位总生存（OS）为25.2个月（95％ CI 17.1～33.3个月）.TX方案组客观有效率（RR）为37.2％（13/35）,中位PFS为6.8个月,中位OS为25.2个月;NX方案组RR为33.3％（10/30）,中位PFS为6.9个月,中位OS为21.0个月.两组RR、PFS及OS差异均无统计学意义（均P＞ 0.05）.两组患者各不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义（均P＞ 0.05）.结论 卡培他滨联合多西他赛或长春瑞滨的两药方案治疗蒽环类和紫杉醇耐药的晚期乳腺癌患者有较好的疾病控制率和生存获益,安全性良好,可作为晚期乳腺患者的一线解救治疗方案进一步推广.     

紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂与吉西他滨联合顺铂一线治疗晚期肺鳞癌患者的疗效比较

目的探讨注射用紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂(LP方案)与吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP方案)一线治疗晚期肺鳞癌患者的临床疗效和不良反应。方法选取2010年7月至2016年7月间山东省肿瘤医院收治的200例晚期肺鳞癌患者,根据治疗方法不同分为LP组和GP组,每组100例。LP组患者采用注射用紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂治疗,GP组患者采用吉西他滨联合顺铂一线化疗治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效和不良反应。结果 LP组患者有效率(RR)为39. 0%,疾病控制率(DCR)为88. 0%,GP组患者RR为43. 0%,DCR为87. 0%; LP组患者中位无进展生存时间(OS)为5. 6个月,中位总生存时间(PFS)为14. 1个月; GP组患者PFS为6. 1个月,OS为13. 5个月。两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0. 05)。GP组患者的白细胞减少、血小板减少和胃肠道反应较LP组更明显,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。结论 LP和GP两种方案治疗晚期肺鳞状细胞癌患者的临床疗效相似,LP方案不良反应较轻。     

奥沙利铂联合紫杉醇脂质体治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析

目的 探讨奥沙利铂联合紫杉醇脂质体或替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及不良反应.方法 选取46例晚期胃癌患者作为研究对象.按照随机数字表法将46例晚期胃癌患者随机分为A组和B组,每组23例.其中,A组患者接受奥沙利铂联合紫杉醇脂质体方案化疗,B组患者接受奥沙利铂联合替吉奥方案化疗.比较两组患者的客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良反应发生情况.结果 A组患者的ORR为47.8%,DCR为78.3%;B组患者的ORR为43.5%,DCR为69.6%;两组患者的ORR和DCR比较,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.767、0.502).A组和B组患者的中位OS分别为9.4个月和9.5个月,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.911).A组患者的中位PFS为6.9个月(95%CI:6.2~7.8个月),长于B组患者的5.4个月(95%CI:4.0~5.9个月),差异有统计学意义(P=0.048).两组患者的中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、贫血、疲劳乏力、腹泻、关节肌肉疼痛、恶心呕吐以及神经毒性的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).结论 奥沙利铂联合紫杉醇脂质体方案和奥沙利铂联合替吉奥方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效接近,但在晚期胃癌患者的无进展生存期方面,奥沙利铂联合紫杉醇脂质体方案可能优于奥沙利铂联合替吉奥方案.     

多西紫杉醇联合顺铂与紫杉醇联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机临床对照研究

背景与目的多西紫杉醇是二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效药物,近年来多项临床试验显示其在一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效与目前常用的一线方案相似。本研究拟比较多西紫杉醇联合顺铂(DC)与紫杉醇联合顺铂(PC)一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效、毒副反应及生存情况。方法细胞学或病理学确诊的90例初治晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为DC组与PC组。DC组:多西紫杉醇75mg/m~2,静脉滴注1小时,第1天,顺铂75mg/m~2,分成两天静脉滴注,第2～3天。PC组:紫杉醇150mg/m~2,静脉滴注3小时,第1天;顺铂75mg/m~2,分成两天静脉滴注,第2-3天。顺铂用药时需水化。两种方案均为21天重复。至少完成2周期化疗的患者进行疗效、毒副反应评价,并分析生存情况。结果DC组总有效率为31.1%,中位生存期为10.2个月,中位疾病进展时间为4.4个月,1年和2年生存率分别为35.6%、8.9%;PC组总有效率为33.3%,中位生存期为10.4个月,中位疾病进展时间为4.9个月,1年和2年生存率分别为37.8%、11.1%。两组的总有效率、中位生存期、中位疾病进展时间及1、2年生存率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度毒副反应为白细胞减少、贫血、恶心、呕吐及脱发,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多西紫杉醇联合顺铂方案与紫杉醇联合顺铂方案比较,疗效与生存相似,毒副反应较轻,耐受性好,是一线治疗非小细胞肺癌的有效方案。     

紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂方案一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床随机对照研究

背景与目的紫杉醇联合顺铂方案(pacilitaxel plus cisplatin,TP)是目前一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的标准方案之一。本研究旨在比较紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂(liposome pacilitaxelplus cisplatin,LP)方案与TP方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC的近期疗效、远期生存及毒副反应。方法 100例患者随机分为两组,分别静脉注射紫杉醇脂质体和紫杉醇注射液150 mg/m~2,第1天,联合顺铂75mg/m~2,第1天-2天,21天一个周期。结果 100例患者均可评价疗效,其中LP组中位无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)为5.1个月,中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)为9.0个月,客观反应率(response rate,RR)为26%;TP组中位PFS为4.2个月,中位OS为9.3个月,RR为24%;两组比较均无统计学差异(P=0.110;P=0.342;P=0.890)。两组Ⅲ度+Ⅳ度毒性反应均无统计学差异(P>0.05),LP组末梢神经炎发生率低于TP组(8%vs 28%,P=0.030)。结论 LP方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC疗效与TP方案相当,末梢神经炎发生率低于TP方案。     

不同治疗方案针对晚期或不可切除血管肉瘤的单中心研究

目的评价不同内科方案治疗晚期或不可切除血管肉瘤的有效性和安全性。方法采用单中心回顾性研究方法, 选取2005年1月至2020年8月于中山大学肿瘤防治中心治疗的晚期或不可切除的血管肉瘤患者55例, 其中接受以阿霉素为主的一线联合化疗(阿霉素组)34例, 接受阿霉素或脂质体阿霉素联合紫杉醇或白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案一线化疗(联合组)12例, 接受紫杉醇为主的一线化疗(紫杉醇组)4例, 接受抗血管生成靶向治疗6例, 接受程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抗体联合抗血管生成靶向治疗2例。靶向和免疫联合靶向治疗包括5例一线治疗及3例二线治疗。采用实体瘤的疗效评价标准1.1标准评价疗效, 药物不良反应根据常见不良反应事件评价标准4.0版本评价。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log rank检验, 影响因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。结果阿霉素组34例患者中部分缓解(PR)18例, 中位无进展生存时间(PFS)为4.5个月, 中位总生存时间(OS)为15个月。联合组12例患者中PR 4例, 中位PFS为4个月, 中位OS为19个月。紫杉醇组4例患者中PR 2例, 中位PFS为3个月, 中位OS...     

多西他赛联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期复治食管癌的临床疗效

目的探讨多西他赛联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期复治食管癌的临床疗效。方法选取2012年5月至2016年5月间云南省肿瘤医院收治的80例晚期复治食管癌患者,采用等距随机抽样法分为观察组与对照组,每组40例。观察者患者采用多西他赛联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗,对照组患者采用多西他赛联合顺铂治疗,2个疗程后比较临床疗效。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率为62.5%,生活质量总分(88.14士1.21)分,对照组患者总有效率为47.5%,生活质量总分(75.33±1.25)分,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);对照组患者不良反应发生率为15.0%,观察组患者为17.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多西他赛联合顺铂与5-氟尿嘧啶化疗方案治疗晚期复治食管癌疗效显著,可作为首选治疗方案推广使用。     

多西他赛作为一线用药治疗卵巢癌研究进展

多西他赛是半合成的紫杉类药物,临床药理学研究证实,多西他赛的抗瘤活性强于紫杉醇,并和紫杉醇没有交叉耐药.已有的研究表明,多西他赛治疗铂类耐药和对紫杉醇耐药的卵巢癌有较好的疗效.近几年,很多研究评价了多西他赛作为一线药物治疗卵巢上皮癌的价值.Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期的临床研究证实,多西他赛联合铂类药物作为一线药物治疗卵巢癌有较好的有效率为58%～89%,而多西他赛联合卡铂化疗的毒副反应比多西他赛联合顺铂少,特别是神经毒性.Ⅲ期临床研究比较了多西他赛联合卡铂方案和目前作为治疗卵巢上皮癌标准一线化疗方案的紫杉醇联合卡铂方案治疗卵巢上皮癌的差别,发现两个方案有相同的有效率,分别为58.7%和59.5%,但是多西他赛联合卡铂化疗的神经毒性更低,所以推荐多西他赛加卡铂联合化疗方案作为卵巢上皮癌的一线化疗方案.     

紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期鼻咽癌的临床研究

目的 观察紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期鼻咽癌的疗效及安全性.方法 随机将晚期鼻咽癌56例分为紫杉醇联合顺铂组(PP组)28例,多两紫杉醇联合顺铂组(DP组)28例.每例至少完成2周期以上的化疗.结果 PP组有效率67.86%,中位缓解期10.7个月,中位生存期18.4个月.DP组有效率71.43%,中位缓解期11.8个月,中位生存期20.2个月.PP组较多出现肌肉骨关节痛和周围神经毒性;其他毒副反应为骨髓抑制和恶心、呕吐等,两组相近.结论 紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇联合顺铂两方案治疗晚期鼻咽癌,效果较好,疗效相当,毒副反应均可耐受.     

多西他赛或吉西他滨联合替吉奥二线治疗晚期食管鳞癌的临床疗效和安全性分析

目的 比较多西他赛或吉西他滨联合替吉奥二线治疗晚期食管鳞癌的临床疗效和安全性.方法 选取一线紫杉醇联合铂类化疗方案治疗失败或缓解后再进展的晚期食管鳞癌患者61例,根据二线化疗方案不同将患者分为多西他赛组和吉西他滨组,多西他赛组(n=31)给予多西他赛联合替吉奥治疗,吉西他滨组(n=30)给予吉西他滨联合替吉奥治疗.两组患者均每2个周期评价疗效,并对两组患者的疗效、不良反应发生情况、无进展生存情况进行比较.结果 多西他赛组和吉西他滨组患者的有效率(RR)分别为25.806%、16.667%,疾病控制率(DCR)分别为61.290%、56.667%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为4.5个月、4.0个月,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者的主要不良反应均为血液学不良反应和消化道不良反应,经过对症治疗均可缓解,多西他赛组的中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、乏力及皮疹的发生率低于吉西他滨组(P<0.05).结论 多西他赛或吉西他滨联合替吉奥药物作为二线化疗方案治疗晚期食管鳞癌疗效相当,但多西他赛相较吉西他滨可有效降低化疗不良反应发生率.     

术前新辅助化疗联合手术切除治疗局部晚期食管癌的疗效观察

【摘要】目的:研究术前紫杉醇+顺铂新辅助化疗联合手术切除在局部晚期食管癌治疗中的临床效果。方法:选取2014 年 1 月 ～2016 年 12 月我院治疗局部晚期食管癌患者 60 例,进行随机分组,对照组 30 例仅在术后给予化疗治疗,观察组 30 例在手术前应用紫杉醇+顺铂新辅助化疗方案治疗,再进行手术治疗,比较两组患者食管癌完全切除率、1年复发率。结果:观察组食管癌完全切除率明显高于对照组,1年复发率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P ＜0. 05)。结论:术前应用紫杉醇+顺铂新辅助化疗联合手术切除治疗局部晚期食管癌临床效果理想。     

Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline

This evidence-based practice guideline on the use of paclitaxel (Taxol^®) or docetaxel (Taxotere^®) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who are candidates for palliative first-line chemotherapy is based on a systematic search and review of literature published in full or in abstract form between 1985 and April 2005. Forty-five randomized trials, including 11 abstracts, were reviewed and clinicians in the province of Ontario, Canada, provided feedback on a draft version of the guideline. Two phase III trials detected a statistically significant survival advantage for a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with best supportive care versus best supportive care alone. Among the nine fully published phase III trials comparing platinum-based chemotherapies, taxane-platinum combinations achieved higher response rates compared with older chemotherapy combinations, although significantly longer survival was observed only for docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vindesine-cisplatin. Response rates and survival were generally not significantly different for taxane-platinum combinations compared with other current chemotherapy combinations, although the toxicity profile of the regimens varied. However, in one large trial, improved tumor response and modest survival and quality of life benefits were associated with docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vinorelbine-cisplatin. No statistically significant survival differences were detected in the three fully published phase III trials comparing a taxane-gemcitabine combination with a taxane-platinum regimen.

Recommendations: (i) paclitaxel or docetaxel combined with cisplatin is recommended as one of a number of chemotherapy options for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with a good performance status; (ii) carboplatin may be combined with a taxane if a patient is unable or unwilling to take cisplatin; (iii) a taxane-gemcitabine combination may be considered for patients with a contraindication to cisplatin and carboplatin; (iv) no firm recommendation can be made on the optimal dose and schedule of taxane-based chemotherapy; however, commonly used regimens include cisplatin 75 mg/m² combined with either docetaxel 75 mg/m² or paclitaxel 135 mg/m² (24-h infusion) and carboplatin AUC 6 combined with paclitaxel 225 mg/m² (3-h infusion); (v) a single-agent taxane may be used if combination chemotherapy is considered inappropriate.     

雷替曲塞联合顺铂方案与多西他赛联合顺铂方案二线治疗晚期/复发宫颈癌的疗效比较

目的:比较雷替曲塞联合顺铂与多西他赛联合顺铂对一线化疗失败的晚期/复发宫颈癌患者的近期疗效、生活质量及不良反应。方法: 将2015年1月至2016年12月确诊为一线化疗失败的晚期/复发宫颈癌患者共93例,随机分为两组。治疗组49例:雷替曲塞 2.5~3 mg/m2, 第1天+顺铂 25~30 mg/m2,第1~3天。对照组44例:多西他赛 60 mg/m2 第1天+顺铂 25~30 mg/m2,第1~3天。治疗组和对照组均21天为一疗程,连续治疗四疗程。结果:治疗组有效率为51.02%,对照组为29.55%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗组疾病控制率为73.47%,对照组为47.73%,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗组患者生活质量改善率（83.67%）明显高于对照组（56.82%）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗组主要不良反应有:乏力（63.27%）、恶心（59.18%）、贫血（46.94%）、白细胞下降（44.90%）。对照组主要不良反应有:贫血（84.09%）、白细胞下降（75.00%）、脱发（47.73%）、恶心（40.91%）。在发生III-IV度不良反应中,治疗组主要为恶心（12.24%）和乏力（14.29%）,对照组主要为骨髓抑制（20.46%）和恶心（13.64%）。结论:雷替曲塞联合顺铂方案治疗一线化疗失败的患者,取得比多西他赛联合顺铂更好的疗效和可接受的不良反应,可在一定程度上提高患者生活质量,可作为晚期或复发宫颈癌患者二线化疗的可选方案。     

紫杉醇脂质体联合5-FU/DDP治疗晚期食管癌49例临床观察

目的观察紫杉醇脂质体联合5-FU/DDP治疗晚期食管癌的疗效及不良反应。方法 49例患者使用紫杉醇脂质体135 mg/m2,5-FU 500 mg/m2静脉滴注,第1-5天;顺铂25 mg/m2静脉滴注,第1-3天。21天为1周期,连用2周期后按照实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST 1.0)评价疗效。结果 49例患者共完成212周期化疗,平均完成4.3周期,CR 4例(8.2%),PR 19例(38.8%),SD 12例(24.4%),PD 14例(28.6%),总有效率(CR+PR)47.0%,临床受益率(CR+PR+SD)74.4%。中位疾病进展时间6月(95%CI:5.09～6.91)。49例患者1年生存率为79.6%(39/49),2年生存率为46.9%(23/49)。不良反应主要为血液学毒性及消化道反应。结论紫杉醇脂质体联合5-FU/DDP治疗晚期食管癌具有较好的有效性及安全性。     

Randomized phase II trial of two different schedules of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the use of a weekly administration of docetaxel as a way of reducing its hematologic toxicity. The purpose of the current randomized study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel plus cisplatin combination on 2 schedules in patients with previously untreated, advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Consenting patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1, plus 3-weekly (75 mg/m(2) on Day 1) or weekly (35 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle) docetaxel, for up to 6 cycles. RESULTS: Of 86 patients accrued, 41 patients were treated with 3-weekly and 43 with weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity in the 3-weekly arm was neutropenia (56% of patients). In those receiving the weekly regimen, the frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (44%) and nausea/vomiting (35%). The overall response rate was 40% with the 3-weekly and 39% with the weekly arm (P = .74). The median progression-free survival was 4.3 months in the 3-weekly arm and 3.9 months in the weekly arm (P = .08) and the median survival was 10.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (P = .76). Quality of life data showed no relevant difference between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly schedule of docetaxel plus cisplatin combination as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, while feasible, has no clear advantage over the standard 3-weekly regimen.     

ATP生物荧光肿瘤体外药敏检测技术指导复发合并恶性胸腔积液的非小细胞肺癌的治疗

Objective: This study was aimed to research the feasibility of ATP-bioluminescence assay (ATP-TCA) guiding the treatment on recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) combined with malignant pleural effusion. Methods: We collected 30 pleural fluid samples which were approved to be positive by cytology from recurrent NSCLC patients. These cells were cocultured with chemotherapy medicines, single agent or drugs combination. Five drug concentrations, two parallel holes were examined in vitro for 4 days, the results were measured by adding luciferase-fluorescein working system and luminescence analyzer. We applied chemotherapy medicines according to the results in vitro of ATP-TCA. Results: There were differences among drug sensitivities of individuals. All the samples could be evaluated. Effective single drugs included cisplatinum, mitomycin C, doxorubicin, and pemetrexed disodium; sensitive drugs in the combination therapy were gemcitabine plus cisplatin, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, paclitaxel plus cisplatin, docetaxel plus cisplatin, and mitomycin C, vindesine plus cisplatin, in which gemcitabine + cispiatin (GEM + DDP) in vitro was the most efficient program. Conclusion: ATP-TCA in vitro sensitivity assay is rapid, reliable, and simple to guide the treatment of recurrent NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion, and can help clinicians to make the individual chemotherapy program.     

Chemotherapy for gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients whose gastric cancer recurred after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. A total of 51 patients were evaluated. Twenty-one patients received S-1-containing chemotherapy as first-line treatment after recurrence [cohort A: S-1 plus cisplatin (n = 10), S-1 monotherapy (n = 7), S-1 plus irinotecan (n = 3) and S-1 plus docetaxel (n = 1)]. The other 30 patients received a non-S-1-containing regimen [cohort B: paclitaxel or docetaxel (n = 22), irinotecan plus cisplatin (n = 6) and other drugs (n = 2)]. No objective responses occurred in cohort A, while five patients achieved a partial response in cohort B (response rate, 0 versus 16%; P = 0.04). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in cohort B than in cohort A (4.3 versus 2.3 months, P = 0.02). S-1-containing chemotherapy does not appear to be effective in patients whose gastric cancer recurs after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy. Other chemotherapeutic agents should be evaluated in this setting.     

A phase II randomized study of two taxanes and cisplatin for metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline: a final analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare two taxanes/cisplatin combinations for metastatic breast cancer in terms of time to disease progression, response rates and toxicity. METHODS: Between April 2000 and December 2002, 101 patients with advanced breast carcinoma, previously treated with an anthracycline but not with a taxane, were enrolled. Fifty patients were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2, and 51 patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2. Each cycle repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62.5 and 42.6% in the docetaxel and palcitaxel groups respectively (P = 0.06). Median time to disease progression was 9.8 and 6.5 months in docetaxel and paclitaxel groups respectively (P = 0.15). The median overall survival time was 22.7 months in the docetaxel arm and 22.4 months in the paclitaxel arm. Grade 3/4 arthralgia/myalgia, sensory neuropathy and anemia occurred more frequently in the paclitaxel arm, while more mucositis, fatigue and neutropenia occurred in the docetaxel arm. CONCLUSION: Taxane/cisplatin combinations were active for advanced breast cancer, while there appeared to be evidence in favor of a docetaxel/cisplatin combination. The toxicity in favor of docetaxel/cisplatin warrants future first-line clinical trials.     

三维适行放疗同期多西紫杉醇和顺铂化疗治疗中晚期食管癌的临床观察

目的 探讨三维适行放疗同期多西紫杉醇和顺铂化疗治疗中晚期食管癌的疗效及毒副反应.方法 68例中晚期食管癌患者随机分为2组,观察组35例接受三维适形放疗同期联合多西紫杉醇和顺铂化疗,对照组33例患者仅接受三维适形放疗.结果 观察组总有效率为82.9%,对照组为69.7%（P〈0.05）.观察组1、2 a生存率分别为68.6%,40.0%,对照组分别为60.6%,30.3%,2组生存率曲线差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.结论 三维适行放疗同期多西紫杉醇和顺铂化疗能提高中晚期食管癌的近期疗效,延长生存期,且毒副反应可耐受.