Histopathological substrate of the atrial myocardium in the progression of obstructive sleep apnoea–related atrial fibrillation

Sleep and Breathing - Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is closely related to atrial fibrillation (AF), and OSA-induced atrial structural remodelling is the basis of AF maintenance. However, the...     

Can we predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex disease with increasing prevalence in an aging population and longer survival with cardiovascular diseases. Whereas most clinical efforts have been aimed at predicting risk of AF sequelae such as stroke and heart failure, little is known on primary prevention. AF risk assessment is complicated by the existence of distinct subtypes of AF, such as lone AF or postoperative AF, in contrast to common AF in the elderly. Due to its often intermittent nature, diagnosing AF can be a challenge. Risk prediction becomes reasonable when specific interventions arise. Due to our limited understanding of AF pathophysiology and substantial lack of specific preventive strategies in the population, modification of the general cardiovascular risk profile has largely remained the only option. Initial attempts at combining established risk factors for AF such as age, sex, hypertension, body mass index, electrocardiographic characteristics, and cardiovascular disease in a risk-prediction instrument have produced a robust algorithm. However, known risk factors only explain a fraction of the population-attributable risk of AF, and the search for novel risk indicators is ongoing. More efficient monitoring for electrocardiographic precursors of AF and the field of genomics are evolving areas of AF risk factor research. A better understanding of the underlying substrate of AF will provide targets for prevention. In the future, clinical trials will be needed to establish risk categories, interventions, and their efficacy. Despite a relevant public-health impact, knowledge on risk prediction and primary prevention of AF is still limited today. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.     

Increasing atrial fibrillation: What is the cause?

A 72‐year‐old woman with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus node dysfunction is seen in clinic for routine follow‐up.     

Non-antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation?

In atrial fibrillation (AF), the absence of a clear benefit of a rhythm-control strategy over a rate-control strategy seen in recent trials may be due to the fact that many of the usual antiarrhythmic strategy have significant weaknesses. Besides research efforts to improve the efficacy and safety of conventional antiarrhythmic agents, therapies directed 'upstream'of the electrical aspects of AF, towards the underlying anatomical substrate and atrial remodelling, have been proposed as new pharmacological therapeutic approaches. Potential upstream therapies for AF comprise a variety of agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), statins, N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and steroids. On the basis of experimental data, clinical studies have provided information on the potential of upstream therapy for the prevention of AF across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular patient groups. In patients with heart failure or hypertension, data are sufficient to support the use of ACEI or ARB as treatment that may decrease the risk of AF beyond their other beneficial effects. Similarly, it is highly possible that the use of statin in patients with a recognized indication may be associated with a benefit against AF. However, in most clinical settings, the evidence appears to be insufficient to drive changes in therapy management per se, and large-scale, randomized controlled trials with adequately defined endpoints are still needed. The results from these trials may help to understand the complex mechanisms that lead to AF, and may clarify the benefit-to-risk ratio of these new therapeutic approaches.     

Acute management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the critical care unit: shouLd it be ibutilide?

BACKGROUND: Ibutilide is currently indicated for the rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation (Afb) or atrial flutter (Afl) of recent onset but limited to patients who are hemodynamically stable and without symptomatic cardiovascular conditions. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of ibutilide in patients with Afb or Afl associated with acute cardiovascular-medical disorders and in patients receiving prior selective antiarrhythmic drug therapy. METHODS: The study included 34 patients, mean age 75 +/- 16.3 years, with Afb (n = 25) or Afl (n = 9) having a variety of disorders, for example, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, borderline hypotension, respiratory failure, and chronic renal failure. Prior antiarrhythmic drugs consisted of propafenone (n = 5) or amiodarone (n = 3). Eligibility for cardioversion was established with appropriate anticoagulation or transesophageal echocardiography findings. Ibutilide was given as up to two 10 min infusions of 1 mg separated by 10 min. RESULTS: The overall conversion rate after ibutilide was 79.4% (27/34 patients): 80% for Afb and 78% for Afl. More than 90% converted within 1 h of treatment. A high conversion rate of 92% resulted in those with an arrhythmia duration of < or = 1 week. All eight patients with prior antiarrhythmic therapy converted to sinus rhythm. The average baseline QTc interval for all patients increased 17.1% (397 +/- 63.3 to 465 +/- 60.2 ms) at 30 min. For eight patients (including four who received prior antiarrhythmic drugs), QTc interval prolongation > or = 500 ms was associated with nearly half the entire incidence of arrhythmic events. Proarrhythmia, the exclusive adverse effect, consisted of ventricular extrasystoles (n = 10) and nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 2) managed with intravenous MgSO4, and sustained polymorphic VT (n = 1) requiring electrical cardioversion. CONCLUSION: Ibutilide is an effective and well tolerated drug for the rapid termination of Afb or Afl of recent onset associated with symptomatic and/or hemodynamically unstable disorders, and it is most efficacious (> or = 90%) when the atrial arrhythmia is < or = 1 week in duration. Proarrhythmic events are readily manageable in a monitored unit with access to appropriate treatment.