Abdominopreanal proctocolectomy and ileal U-pouch in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis

In some cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, cancerous changes frequently occur on the distal rectum, in which case a restorative proctocolectomy is not recommended because of the limitations of a radical resection. Even if rectal cancer is not confirmed preoperatively, a strong possibility of cancer in the rectum could afford some support for a radical pelvic dissection during the anus-sparing procedure. The author designed a new operative procedure for resolving this problem. It is an abdominopreanal extrasphincteric proctocolectomy with preileal-pouch positioning of the distal ileal segment including the ileocecal sphincter (ileal U-pouch) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis coli (restorative radical proctocolectomy). The author performed this restorative radical proctocolectomy on seven patients over the past 5 years at the Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, of which four cases were ulcerative colitis and three were familial adenomatous polyposis. The results obtained were as follows: (a) The most common sequela was nocturnal seepage, which lasted for 6 months in 4 patients after the final operation. (b) The mean frequency of defecation was six times per day at 6 months after the final operation. (c) The average amount of stool was about 460 g per day at 6 months after the final operation. Therefore, the ileal U-pouch is considered to be effective in reducing the daily amount of stool. A preanal extrasphincteric approach could be especially useful in the case of a difficult dissection of the anterectal space while also providing an effective dependent drainage of the ileoanal anastomotic space.This paper was presented at the 95th Annual Congress of the Japan Surgical Society in Nagoya, Japan, April 10–12, 1995. The author received a travel grant from the Japan Surgical Society.     

Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Clinical results in 66 patients followed for up to 6 years.

The results of restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir were reviewed. Of 66 patients treated between 1976 and 1982, 52 had ulcerative colitis and 14 had familial adenomatous polyposis. The temporary ileostomy was closed between 2 and 78 months previously in 63 cases. Of these, three patients had had the reservoir removed and two were lost to follow-up. One other patient was subsequently found to have Crohn's disease. Function was assessed in 55 patients who had undergone closure of the ileostomy more than 8 weeks previously. Mean frequency of defecation was 3.7 per 24 hours (range 1-9.5) and 11 patients (20%) were taking antidiarrheal medication. Spontaneous defecation occurred in 22 patients (40%) while 29 (52.7%) had to use a catheter passed per anum. Four patients defecated spontaneously but sometimes used a catheter. Continence was normal in 36 (65.4%) and minor leakage once every 2 to 3 days occurred at night in 16 (29.1%). Three patients (5.4%) had some soiling during day and night. Troublesome perianal soreness (five patients, 9.1%) necessitated a defunctioning ileostomy in one. Fifty-four of the 55 patients assessed preferred their quality of life to that with an ileostomy.     

腹腔镜全结直肠切除并拖出式直肠黏膜剥离术治疗FAP及UC

目的探讨腹腔镜全结直肠切除并拖出式直肠黏膜剥离术治疗家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)及溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的可行性及安全性。方法自2007年12月至2009年9月,应用腹腔镜全结直肠切除治疗FAP9例及UC4例,除2例因直肠癌变行回肠造口外,其余11例均在腹腔镜下游离全结直肠后,将直肠外翻拖出后行直肠黏膜剥离,再将回肠J型储袋与齿线行手工吻合。结果 13例手术均在腹腔镜辅助下成功完成,平均手术时间(248.8±27.8)min,平均出血量(61.0±27.7)ml,辅助切口平均长度(3.8±1.0)cm,术后2~3d排气。所有患者术后恢复顺利,无严重并发症。所有患者随访超过4个月,肛门功能恢复较满意。结论腹腔镜辅助全结直肠切除、拖出式直肠黏膜剥离并回肠储袋肛管吻合术是可行、安全及微创的,在保证对疾病治疗彻底性的同时,能取得较满意的近期效果。     

The W ileal reservoir: long-term assessment after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.

BACKGROUND. This report examines the viability of the W reservoir as a reliable option for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis and studies W reservoir adaptation as reflected by changes in compliance and stool frequency. METHODS. Since 1984, 109 patients have undergone proctocolectomy with W reservoir reconstruction. Ileal reservoir static compliance was measured in 70 and 57 patients at 2 and 12 months after ileostomy takedown and in 25 patients at 3 years. Compliance was calculated as the change in volume over change in pressure. RESULTS. Twenty-four-hour stool frequency decreased from 7.3 +/- 0.2 at 2 months to 4.9 +/- 0.2 at 1 year for patients with ulcerative colitis and from 6.3 +/- 0.4 to 3.4 +/- 0.4 for patients with familial polyposis (p less than or equal to 0.05). Compliance increased from 12.7 +/- 0.6 ml/mm Hg to 14.3 +/- 0.6 ml/mm Hg between 2 months and 1 year. No significant increase in compliance occurred after 1 year. Ninety-six percent of patients were continent during the day at 12 months although 10% experienced occasional minor leakage at night. Average postoperative morbidity (for example, small-bowel obstruction, anastomotic complications) was 35%. No operative deaths, pelvic sepsis, or reservoir loss occurred. CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that W ileal reservoirs (1) are an excellent option for ileal reservoir reconstruction, (2) have optimal functional and compliance properties versus lower capacity designs and straight ileoanal pull-through procedures, and (3) maintain stable compliance characteristics and functional reservoir volume after the initial year of adaptation.     

Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: initial experience in Mexico

Background Since the introduction of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991, experience in laparoscopic bowel surgery has gradually increased. Several reports from specialized centers have demonstrated that laparoscopic colorectal resections are feasible and safe, providing an acceptable alternative to laparotomy for a variety of diseases. Some studies have shown the feasibility, safety, and good functional outcome of the minimally invasive procedures for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). No known studies have investigated laparoscopic proctocolectomy in México. This report aims to describe the first laparoscopic proctocolectomies with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ). Methods All the patients in the authors’ institution who underwent a one- or two-stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with IPAA between June 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon, who had already completed the learning curve for colorectal laparoscopic procedures. Results For the study, 10 patients underwent a laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA by a single surgeon. Eight of the patients underwent a one-stage procedure, whereas two patients with severe colitis underwent a two-step procedure. All the cases were managed with a diverting loop ileostomy. Six patients underwent a standard double-stapled IPAA anastomosis, and two patients with FAP underwent a mucosectomy with a manual IPAA anastomosis. The mean operative time was 187 min, and the mean blood loss was 46 ml. There were two postoperative complications. One patient presented with an early small bowel obstruction due to an internal hernia, which required reoperation. The other complication was a wound infection. The mean return to oral intake was 1.5 days, and the mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days. Conclusion Although this was not a comparative study and although sample size imposed limitations, with this preliminary data, we conclude that the laparoscopic approach to UC and FAP at our institution is safe, feasible, and effective. However, to achieve the benefits in postoperative outcome, this procedure should be performed only by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.     

Endorectal ileal pullthrough with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and polyposis

Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileal pullthrough operations were performed in 29 patients (mean age 16.8 years) with ulcerative colitis or polyposis during the past 10 years. The immediate and long-term results achieved after use of a lateral internal ileal reservoir 25 to 30 cm long in 15 patients were superior to those after construction of an S-shaped reservoir (5 patients) or when no ileal reservoir was used (3 patients). A completely diverting ileostomy was used for approximately 4 months to minimize complications. A mean of four continent bowel movements per 24 hours has been achieved within 4 weeks in patients with lateral reservoirs; all have returned to school or work within 4.5 weeks. The absence of mortality and the low morbidity suggest that the endorectal pullthrough with ileal reservoir should be the primary operation early in the course of ulcerative colitis refractory to medical therapy.     

Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

The results of 36 restorative proctocolectomies (with 2-loop reservoir) for ulcerative colitis (UC) performed in a three-year period were surveyed. These patients represented 69% of all those undergoing definitive surgery for UC at the same time at our department. There was no operative mortality. Both early (44.4%) and late complications (45.2%) were quite common, but they were mostly minor and only two were permanent failures (5.6%) requiring construction of conventional ileostomy. Anastomotic retraction and sinus formation (25%), as revealed by pouch x-ray, were the most frequent early complications, occurring in a lesser degree (19.4%) also after stoma closure. Pouchitis was also a common (20%) late complication, but usually resolved promptly with metronidazole treatment. The functional results in the 23 patients evaluated were satisfactory, with a mean defaecation frequency of 5.4 per 24 hour and a minor soiling frequency of 36%. None of the patients had to wear a pad. The over-all results are compatible to those from other centres and suggest that acceptable anal function follows restorative proctocolectomy in most suitable cases with UC. The role of adequate surgical experience and consideration of contraindications must, however, be emphasised, and the surgeon must be ready to handle many minor and even major complications.     

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis:A narrative review

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RP-IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis.However,despite the widespread use of RP-IPAA,many aspects of this treatment still remain controversial,such as the approach(open or laparoscopic),number of stages in the surgery,type of pouch,and construction type(hand-sewn or stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis).The present narrative review aims to discuss current evidence on the short-,mid-,and long-term results of each of these technical alternatives as well as their benefits and disadvantages.A review of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Ovid databases was performed to identify studies published through March 2016.Few large,randomized,controlled studies have been conducted,which limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding controversial issues.The available data from retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopic surgery has no clear advantages compared with open surgery and that one-stage RP-IPAA may be indicated in selected cases.Regarding 2- and 3-stage RP-IPAA,patients who underwent these surgeries differed significantly with respect to clinical and laboratory variables,making any comparisons extremely difficult.The long-term results regarding the pouch type show that the W- and J-reservoirs do not differ significantly,although the J pouch is generally preferred by surgeons.Hand-sewn and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomoses have their own advantages,and there is no clear benefit of one technique over the other.     

Laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is a hereditary disease characterized by the presence of thousands of colonic adenomas, which, if untreated, invariably undergo malignant transformation. Because this disease manifests at a young age, the laparoscopic approach to perform surgery would be desirable due to its cosmetic benefits. We describe our experience with this procedure and review the literature on the topic. METHODS: This is a case series of 15 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis between 2000 and 2007. The salient operative steps are described. RESULTS: There were 9 males and 6 females, 32 to 52 years of age, with an average age of 44.8 years. The median body mass index was 21.5 (range, 17 to 28). Rectal cancer was already present in 4 patients at the time of diagnosis. The median operating time was 225 minutes. Mean blood loss was 60 mL, with none of the patients requiring perioperative blood transfusion. None of the surgeries required conversion to the open approach. Bowel function resumed on the second postoperative day in 12 patients and on the third postoperative day in 3 patients. The median hospital stay was 8 days. Postoperatively, there was no mortality and no serious morbidity. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a feasible surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis, and considering its cosmetic benefit, is a desirable option for this group of predominantly young patients.     

Ileoanal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis

Although total proctocolectomy with permanent ileostomy is regarded as the definitive therapy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis, psychologic and physical complications with this operation have stimulated the development of the operation of total abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, ileal reservoir, and ileoanal anastomosis as an alternative surgical procedure. Since 1980, 104 of these operative procedures have been completed with no operative mortality; experience has been gained with both the J- and S-type reservoirs. Despite an appreciable number of postoperative complications, satisfactory function of the reservoir has been achieved in 86 of 91 patients followed up for at least three months after closure of the ileostomy. The remaining five patients have required reinstitution of fecal diversion. Functional results have not differed between two-limbed and three-limbed reservoirs. This operation must be considered a viable alternative in patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.     

Gasless laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE: We evaluated the data on initial experience of gasless laparoscopic surgery for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients (male/female = 3:4, median age 23, UC/FAP=5:2) underwent gasless laparoscopic total (procto) colectomy. Our basic surgical procedure involved (1) a 6- to 8-cm incision made at the beginning of the operation, (2) the wound pulled upward and/or laterally by retractors, and (3) conventional surgical instruments used through the wound; occasionally laparoscopic assistance and abdominal lifting were employed. The results were compared to those of 7 patients who had undergone conventional open surgery. RESULTS: Oral intake started earlier (p = 0.03) and C-reactive protein level on POD 4 was lower (p = 0.03) in the gasless group than in the control group. Duration of surgery, blood loss, requirement of analgesia, and morbidity rate were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that gasless laparoscopic surgery for UC and FAP is feasible and can be an alternative method for minimally invasive surgery.     

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis

An initial experience with a technique of restorative proctocolectomy utilizing a rectal mucosectomy, total colectomy, and ileal reservoir (Parks S-pouch) with ileoanal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis is presented. Although there were no deaths, significant morbidity did occur and was attributed to the use of a temporary loop ileostomy which may not be necessary. Early functional results are promising and to date, patient satisfaction is very high.     

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in very young patients with refractory ulcerative colitis

Background/purpose

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). The purpose of the current study was to determine the outcome of very young patients (≤10 years of age) with UC undergoing IPAA.

Methods

Between 1978 and 2002, 13 patients 10 years of age or younger underwent IPAA for management of UC at the authors’ institution. Charts were reviewed for patient characteristics, and a standardized telephone interview was performed.

Results

Average age at diagnosis was 4.0 years (range, 1.0 to 8.4 years), and patients underwent IPAA at a mean of 6.8 years (range, 3.7 to 10.8 years). Pancolitis was present in 100%. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years (1.0 to 16.1 years), the average number of stools per day was 5 (3 to 8). All patients are continent while awake. Pouchitis was documented in 9 patients (75%). All patients or their parents rated the outcome of their procedures as “excellent.”

Conclusions

When compared with older children, very young patients with UC tend to have more frequent total colonic involvement and a greater frequency of pouchitis after IPAA. The functional outcome and patient/family satisfaction with the procedure endorse IPAA as an attractive procedure even in the very young population with UC.     

The lateral reservoir technique of ileal endorectal pull-through for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis in children

Total abdominal colectomy and endorectal ileal pull-through have been widely used in children as a definitive continence-preserving procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial polyposis (FP). Controversy exists in regards to the results achieved with the various techniques utilized to accomplish this procedure, including straight ileal pull-through, pull-through with balloon dilatation of the lower ileal segment, and the construction of a variety of ileal reservoirs: S-shaped, J-shaped, or lateral. We have utilized the two-stage lateral reservoir approach advocated by Fonkalsrud et al, on a total of 12 patients, aged 1 to 17 years, including ten patients with UC and two with FP. Twelve patients have undergone stage 1 and seven of these stage 2. Numerous complications of stage 1 occurred early in the series, including breakdown of the ileoanal anastomosis, 3 patients; cuff abscess, 2 patients; postoperative intestinal obstruction, 2 patients; and intraabdominal abscess, 1 patient. All have fully recovered. The last six stage 1 procedures have been without complications. Five of the seven stage 2 patients are now well, continent, and having four to six controlled bowel movements a day 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Two patients are using small amounts of Immodium and Metamucil. One patient has developed marked dilatation of the pouch at 8 months postoperatively with episodic "pouchitis" requiring operative revision and diversion. One stage 2 patient suffered numerous complications including spontaneous perforation of the reservoir 2 months postoperatively, eventually leading to re-creation of a permanent ileostomy and removal of the pouch. Five patients await further treatment. The lateral reservoir technique is capable of producing a satisfied and continent patient; however, the potential technical problems and early complications are significant. The occurrence of delayed "pouchitis" is worrisome. Although the initial results with the lateral reservoir technique appear encouraging, further longterm evaluation is necessary.     

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of results in familial adenomatous polyposis and chronic ulcerative colitis.

The aim of this study was to compare the immediate postoperative results and the long-term outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 94 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis to those in 758 patients with ulcerative colitis. Two colitis patients died after operation (0.3%), but no polyposis patients died. Overall operative complications appeared in 26% and 29% of polyposis and colitis patients, respectively (NS). Reoperation for intestinal obstruction did not differ between the two groups, but sepsis requiring reoperation was more common in colitis patients (6%) than in polyposis patients (0%, p less than 0.04). At follow-up (mean, 3 years), polyposis patients had fewer daytime stools (4.5 stools per day), less nighttime fecal spotting (26%), and less pouchitis (7%) than colitis patients (5.8 stools per day; spotting, 40%; pouchitis, 22%; p less than 0.002). The conclusion was that polyposis patients tolerated the operation better and had less long-term disability than did colitis patients. The data suggest that postoperative sepsis, daytime stooling frequency, nocturnal incontinence, and pouchitis may be, at least in part, disease related and not surgeon or operation related.     

Quality-of-life assessment after ileoanal pull-through for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The ileoanal pull-through procedure (IAP) is gaining increasing favor and use in the surgical treatment of children with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FP). Although physiological studies have been performed to assess the outcome of these children, no long-term quality-of-life assessment after the procedure has been performed. METHODS: Forty-three patients were identified who had an IAP at our institution in the last 10 years and were at least 6 months postsurgery. Thirty-four were contacted, and 32 agreed to participate in the survey, which was approved by the Human Studies Committee. Participants completed the standardized Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), which has well-established normative values. Several supplemental questions were prepared in a similar format dealing with issues specific to the ileoanal pull-through procedure. RESULTS: Of the 32 participants, 19 (59%) were girls and 26 (81%) had ulcerative colitis. Mean age at the time of survey was 18.1 years with 12 less than 18 years and 20 > or =18 years. Data from the latter group could be compared with national normative values for this age. The study group was not statistically different from age-appropriate US population normal values on all assessable scales of physical and mental health in the SF-36 survey including physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health (all P>.05 or mean difference SD units <0.8). The supplemental questionaire demonstrated little adverse effect of the surgery. There was limited consumption of medications to control bowel frequency and little restriction of activity because of the frequency of bowel movements or fear of incontinence. The surgical scar was the sole negative factor of significance. CONCLUSIONS: The ileoanal pull-through procedure is an excellent surgical option for children with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, and it produced minimal, if any, adverse effects on their long-term quality of life.