Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT scans for diagnosing ovarian cancer recurrence

Objective

To evaluate low-dose non-enhanced CT (ldCT) and full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) in integrated ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT studies for restaging of ovarian cancer.

Materials and methods

One hundred and twenty women who had undergone treatment for ovarian cancer underwent a conventional PET/CT scans with ldCT, and then ceCT. Two observers interpreted and decided in consensus on the PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT images by a 3-point scale (N: negative, E: equivocal, P: positive) per patient and lesion site. Final diagnoses were obtained by histopathological examinations, or clinical follow-up for at least 6 months.

Results

Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/ceCT was 86.9% (40/46), 95.9% (71/74), and 92.5% (111/120), respectively, whereas those of PET/ldCT were 78.3% (36/46), 95.0% (70/74), and 88.3% (106/120), respectively. All sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy significantly differed between two methods (McNemar test, p < 0.0005, p = 0.023, and p < 0.0001, respectively). The scales of detecting 104 recurrent lesion sites were N:14, E:6, P:84 for PET/ceCT, and N:15, E:17, P:72 for PET/ldCT, respectively. Eleven equivocal and one negative regions by PET/ldCT were correctly interpreted as positive by PET/ceCT.

Conclusion

PET/ceCT is a more accurate imaging modality with higher confidence for assessing ovarian cancer recurrence than PET/ldCT.     

Non-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for nodal staging of rectal cancer

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for preoperative nodal staging of rectal cancer. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in 53 patients with pathologically proven rectal cancer who had been referred for preoperative staging. All patients underwent integrated PET/CT consisting of non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT followed by whole-body fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET. Both non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT images were evaluated separately by two observers in consensus. The reference standard was histopathologic results. For nodal staging of rectal cancer, we compared diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis between the two modalities. Results Nodal staging was correctly determined with non-enhanced studies in 37 patients (70%) and with contrast-enhanced studies in 42 patients (79%). On a per-patient basis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of regional lymph node staging were 85%, 68%, 83%, 72%, and 79%, respectively, with contrast-enhanced studies, and 85%, 42%, 73%, 62%, and 70%, respectively, with non-enhanced studies. The difference in the accuracy of nodal staging between the two modalities was not significant (p = 0.063). Compared with non-enhanced studies, contrast-enhanced studies determined more correctly the status of pararectal lymph nodes (p = 0.002), internal iliac lymph nodes (p = 0.004), and obturator lymph nodes (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced PET/CT is superior to non-enhanced PET/CT for precise definition of regional nodal status in rectal cancer.     

PET/CT versus MRI for diagnosis,staging, and follow‐up of lung cancer

Positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT), with its metabolic data of ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) cellular uptake in addition to morphologic CT data, is an established technique for staging of lung cancer and has higher sensitivity and accuracy for lung nodule characterization than conventional approaches. Its strength extends outside the chest, with unknown metastases detected or suspected metastases excluded in a significant number of patients. Lastly, PET/CT is used in the assessment of therapy response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the chest has been difficult to establish, but with the advent of new sequences is starting to become an increasingly useful alternative to conventional approaches. Diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) is useful for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, has high sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging, and is helpful for evaluating an early response to systemic chemotherapy. Whole‐body MRI/PET promises to contribute additional information with its higher soft‐tissue contrast and much less radiation exposure than PET/CT and has become feasible for fast imaging and can be used for cancer staging in patients with a malignant condition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:247–260.     

Staging accuracy of pancreatic cancer: Comparison between non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT

Purpose

Our aim was to clarify the diagnostic impact of contrast-enhanced (CE) ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer compared to non-CE PET/CT.

Method and materials

Between April 2006 and November 2009, a total of 95 patients (age range, 36–83 years [mean age, 67]) with primary pancreatic cancer underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations. Diagnostic accuracy was compared between non-CE PET/CT and CE PET/CT. Images were analyzed visually and quantitatively by two blinded reviewers. Reference standard was histological examination in 48 patients (51%) and/or confirmation of an obvious progression in number and/or size of the lesions on follow-up CT examinations in 47 patients (49%).

Results

For T-staging, invasion of duodenum (n = 20, 21%), mesentery (n = 12, 13%), and retroperitoneum (n = 13, 14%) was correctly diagnosed by both modalities. The ROC analyses revealed that the Az values of celiac artery (CA), common hepatic artery (CHA), splenic artery (SV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) invasion were significantly higher in the CE PET/CT group for both readers. Nodal metastasis was correctly diagnosed by CE PET/CT in 38 patients (88%) and by non-CE PET/CT in 45 patients (87%). Diagnostic accuracies of nodal metastasis in two modalities were similar. Using CE PET/CT, distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination were correctly assigned in 39 patients (91%), while interpretation based on non-CE PET/CT revealed distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination in 42 patients (81%). Diagnostic accuracy of distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination with CE PET/CT was significantly higher than that of non-CE PET/CT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

CE PET/CT allows a more precise assessment of distant metastasis, scalene node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination in patients with pancreatic cancer.     

Integrated PET/CT in the preoperative staging of lung cancer: A prospective comparison of CT,PET and integrated PET/CT

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of integrated PET/CT in the staging of lung cancer compared with CT alone or PET alone.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three patients underwent integrated PET/CT for the staging of lung cancer. The tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) stages were assessed with CT, PET and integrated PET–CT and compared with the surgical and pathological staging.

Results

CT correctly evaluated the (T) status in (64%) of the patients, PET in (59%) and PET/CT in (86%). CT correctly evaluated the (N) status in (73%) of the patients, PET in (76%), and PET/CT (88%) with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 73%, 78%, 71%, 50% and 94% for CT, 76%, 67%, 79%, 55% and 95% for PET and 88%, 89%, 88%, 73% and 100% for PET/CT respectively, and for (M) status were 91%, 86%, 92%, 75% and 96% for CT, 88%, 71%, 92%, 71% and 92% for PET and 97%, 100%, 96%, 88% and 100% for PET/CT respectively. Regarding the overall TNM staging CT correctly staged 24 patients. PET correctly staged 23 cases while PET/CT correctly staged 30 cases. A significant difference in the accuracy of overall tumor staging between PET/CT and CT (P = 0.0412) or PET (P = 0.0233).

Conclusion

The integrated PET/CT is superior to either CT or PET in the staging of lung cancer which has an important impact on selection of the appropriate treatment regimen.     

Prospective evaluation of MRI,C-acetate PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for staging of bladder cancer

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ¹¹C-acetate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced CT for bladder cancer staging, using whole-mount pathologic review of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node specimens as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

The institutional review board approved this prospective study, which was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Written informed consent was obtained from 16 patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer who underwent MRI, ¹¹C-acetate PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT before radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Before imaging 4/16 patients had received intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment, 6 had received systemic chemotherapy, 3 had received both and 3 had received neither. Measures of diagnostic performance including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were estimated separately for each imaging modality.

Results

MRI correctly staged 56% of patients (9/16), overstaged 38% (6/16) and understaged 6% (1/16). CT correctly staged 50% of patients (8/16), overstaged 44% (7/16) and understaged 6% (1/16). In 9 patients, ¹¹C-acetate PET/CT showed uptake within the bladder wall; the uptake was true-positive in 7 patients and false-positive in 2 patients. Of the remaining 7 patients, 5 had true-negative and 2 had false-negative PET/CT results for cancer in the bladder wall. For all modalities, staging accuracy was reduced in patients with a history of prior intravesical and/or systemic chemotherapy.

Conclusion

In staging bladder cancer, MRI, ¹¹C-acetate PET/CT and CT displayed similar levels of accuracy. For all modalities, a history of intravesical and/or systemic chemotherapy affected staging accuracy.     

18F-FDG hPET/CT显像在非小细胞肺癌临床分期中的应用

目的探讨^18F-脱氧葡萄糖hPET/CT（^18F-FDG hPET/CT）显像在非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）临床分期中的应用价值。方法72例NSCLC患者于放疗前行^18F-FDG hPET/CT显像检查,进行FDG分期,并将FDG分期和CT分期结果进行比较分析。结果^18F-FDG hPET/CT显像使27例NSCLC患者分期改变,其中分期升级20例,分期降级7例。14例分期升级者^18F-FDG hPET/CT显像检查发现了远处转移灶,其治疗方案由根治性治疗改为姑息性治疗。FDG显像较CT多发现了47个转移淋巴结,并对其进行了放疗;多发现了26个远处转移灶,并对其进行了姑息性放疗。结论^18F-FDG hPET/CT显像改变了37．5％（27／72）NSCLC患者的临床分期,影响了其治疗策略及放疗计划,使得治疗更加合理。     

Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: Comparison with F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic value of retrospective fusion of pelvic MRI and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET images for assessment of locoregional extension and nodal staging of endometrial cancer.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with biopsy-proven endometrial cancer underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced PET/CT (PET/ceCT) and pelvic dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for initial staging. Diagnostic performance of PET/ceCT, contrast-enhanced MRI, and retrospective image fusion from PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) for assessing the extent of the primary tumor (T stage) and metastasis to regional LNs (N stage) was evaluated by two experienced readers. Histopathological and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard. The McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis.

Results

Fused PET/MRI and MRI detected 96.7% of the primary tumors, whereas PET/ceCT detected 93.3%. Accuracy for T status was 80.0% for fused PET/MRI, and MRI proved significantly more accurate than PET/ceCT, which had an accuracy of 60.0% (p = 0.041). Patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detecting pelvic nodal metastasis were 100%, 96.3% and 96.7% for both fused PET/MRI and PET/ceCT, and 66.7%, 100% and 96.7% for MRI, respectively. These three parameters were not statistically significant (p = 1).

Conclusion

Fused PET/MRI, which complements the individual advantages of MRI and PET, is a valuable technique for assessment of the primary tumor and nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer.     

Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the staging and restaging of colorectal cancer: Comparison with PET and enhanced CT

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of PET/CT as a one step examination in patients with colorectal cancer. Therefore we proved whether diagnostic PET/CT adds information over PET or contrast-enhanced CT alone for staging or restaging of patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Seventy-three patients (46 males and 27 females; age range: 50-81 years; mean age: 67 years) with known colorectal cancer underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT for staging or restaging.

Results

Of the 73 patients 26 patients underwent PET/CT for staging and 47 for restaging. 266 metastases could be detected in 60 patients. Contrast-enhanced PET/CT had a lesion-based sensitivity of 100%, contrast-enhanced CT of 91% and PET of 85%. PET/CT identified 2 lesions as false positive. PET/CT could also reach a patient-based sensitivity of 100%, which was superior to contrast-enhanced CT and PET.

Conclusion

Our study clearly demonstrated the added value of contrast-enhanced PET/CT in staging and restaging patients with colorectal cancer over CT and PET alone.     

The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

Aim

To date, no data are available on the use of PET/CT for preoperative staging of gastric cancer. We attempted to evaluate the value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer, and to compare the use of PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).

Materials and methods

We analyzed PET/CT of 78 patients with surgically proven advanced gastric cancer who had undergone preoperative CECT. Qualitative analysis was conducted by assessing the presence of primary tumors and metastases with PET/CT and CECT.

Results

Among 71 patients who underwent a gastrectomy, 69 primary tumors (93%) were diagnosed by PET/CT, while 64 primary tumors (90%) were detected by CECT (p = 0.55). For regional lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT vs. CECT were 41% vs. 25% (p = 0.00019), 100% vs. 92% (p = 0.31), 100% vs. 98% (p = 0.46), 26% vs. 42% (p = 0.14), and 51% vs. 72% (p = 0.00089), respectively.

Conclusion

Overall, PET/CT showed comparable diagnostic performance to CECT in diagnosing primary tumors and regional lymph node metastases, though PET/CT was inferior to CECT for the sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosing regional lymph node metastases. Nevertheless, PET/CT would be useful when CECT findings were equivocal due to its high positive predictability.     

Bone metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: The diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Materials and methods

Three hundred and sixty-two consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed. Each image of PET/CT, combined CT, and PET was performed at 10 separate areas and interpreted blindly and separately. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT, combined CT and F-18 FDG PET were calculated and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results

Bone metastasis was confirmed in 82 patients with 331 positive segments based on the image findings and clinical follow-up. On patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of F-18 FDG PET/CT (93.9%) was significantly higher than those of combined CT (74.4%) and F-18 FDG PET (84.1%), respectively (p < 0.05). The overall specificity and accuracy of combined CT, F-18 FDG PET, and F-18 FDG PET/CT were 90.7%, 93.2%, 98.9% and 87.0%, 91.2%, and 97.8%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05). On segment-based analysis, the sensitivity of the three modalities were 79.5%, 94.3%, and 98.8%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05). The overall specificity and accuracy of the three modalities were 87.9%, 89.2%, 98.6% and 84.5%, 91.2%, 98.7%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

F-18 FDG PET/CT is superior to F-18 FDG PET or combined CT in detecting bone metastasis of NSCLC patients because of the complementation of CT and PET. It is worth noting that the added value of F-18 FDG PET/CT may beneficially impact the clinical management of NSCLC.     

Value of retrospective image fusion of F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: Comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI

Purpose

To assess the clinical value of retrospective image fusion of neck MRI and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET for locoregional extension and nodal staging of neck cancer.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity or hypopharynx underwent PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI for initial staging before surgery including primary tumor resection and neck dissection. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT, MRI, and retrospective image fusion of PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) for assessment of the extent of the primary tumor (T stage) and metastasis to regional lymph nodes (N stage) was evaluated.

Results

Accuracy for T status was 87% for fused PET/MRI and 90% for MRI, thus proving significantly superior to PET/CT, which had an accuracy of 67% (p = 0.041 and p = 0.023, respectively). Accuracy for N status was 77% for both fused PET/MRI and PET/CT, being superior to MRI, which had an accuracy of 63%, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.13). On a per-level basis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detection of nodal metastasis were 77%, 96% and 93% for both fused PET/MRI and PET/CT, compared with 49%, 99% and 91% for MRI, respectively. The differences for sensitivity (p = 0.0026) and accuracy (p = 0.041) were significant.

Conclusion

Fused PET/MRI combining the individual advantages of MRI and PET is a valuable technique for assessment of staging neck cancer.     

Dual-time point scanning of integrated FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed as operable by contrast-enhanced CT

Purpose

To evaluate whether dual-time point scanning with integrated fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) is useful for evaluation of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed as operable by contrast-enhanced CT.

Materials and methods

PET/CT data and pathological findings of 560 nodal stations in 129 patients with pathologically proven non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed as operable by contrast-enhanced CT were reviewed retrospectively. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) on early scans (SUVe) 1 h, and on delayed scans (SUVd) 2 h after FDG injection of each nodal station were measured. Retention index (RI) (%) was calculated by subtracting SUVe from SUVd and dividing by SUVe. Logistic regression analysis was performed with seven kinds of models, consisting of (1) SUVe, (2) SUVd, (3) RI, (4) SUVe and SUVd, (5) SUVe and RI, (6) SUVd and RI, and (7) SUVe, SUVd and RI. The seven derived models were compared by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. k-Fold cross-validation was performed with k values of 5 and 10. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Model (1) including the term of SUVe showed the largest area under the ROC curve among the seven models. The cut-off probability of metastasis of 3.5% with SUVe of 2.5 revealed a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 81% on ROC analysis, and approximately 60% and 80% on k-fold cross-validation.

Conclusion

Single scanning of PET/CT is sufficiently useful for evaluating mediastinal and hilar nodes for metastasis.     

F-FDG18PET/CT incidental detection of tumor-to-tumor metastasis in patients investigated for squamous cell lung cancer

Tumor-to-tumor metastasis (TTM) is a well-known entity, although this is still an extremely rare phenomenon. The lung cancers are considered the most frequent metastatic donors while kidney cancers are the most common recipient. The finding of TTM is often incidental during a biopsy of metastases or on surgical specimens but never suspected on radiological assessment of tumor extension. The finding of an unexpected region of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can occur when performing whole body Positron Emission Tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan and potentially raises the possibility of a second primary tumor. However, PET/CT scan incidental detection of tumor-to-tumor metastasis has never been reported in English literature. We report here a case of clear cell renal carcinoma, receptor of metastases originating from an oligometastatic squamous cell lung cancer detected on the PET/CT scan performed as part of the extension workup. Morphological and immunohistochemical analysis of a percutaneous biopsy of the renal mass were consistent with the diagnosis of a metastasis of lung cancer into renal cell carcinoma. This is the first case of oligometastatic lung cancer with the occurrence of TTM suspected in PET/CT scan. Although this is a rare setting, it should be considered in daily practice, as it could potentially modify the oncological management offered to the patients.     

Value of 124I-PET/CT in staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of ¹²⁴I positron emission tomography (PET) using a combined PET/CT tomograph in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma and to compare the PET/CT results with ¹³¹I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS), dedicated PET and CT alone. Twelve thyroid cancer patients were referred for diagnostic workup and entered complete clinical evaluation, including histology, cytology, thyroglobulin level, ultrasonography, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, FDG-PET/CT and CT. Lesion-based evaluation showed a lesion delectability of 56, 87 and 100% for CT, ¹²⁴I-PET, and combined ¹²⁴I-PET/CT imaging, respectively. Lesion delectability of ¹³¹I-WBS was 83%. We conclude that ¹²⁴I-PET/CT imaging is a promising technique to improve treatment planning in thyroid cancer. It is particularly valuable in patients suffering from advanced differentiated thyroid cancer prior to radio-iodine therapy and in patients with suspected recurrence and potential metastatic disease.     

Meta-analysis study of lymph node staging by 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan in non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison of TB and non-TB endemic regions

Lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is challenging and important for deciding treatment policy. The role of PET/CT scans in lymph node staging of NSCLC remains controversial when comparing TB and non-TB endemic regions. This study systematically reviews the literature regarding the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in lymph node staging of patients with NSCLC, and determines its pooled sensitivity and speci?city.     

PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma

Myeloma is the most common primary bone malignancy. It accounts for 10% of all hematological malignancies and 1% of all cancers. In the United States, there are an estimated 16,000 new cases and over 11,000 deaths yearly due to myeloma. Plasma cell dyscrasias manifest themselves in a variety of forms that range from MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) and smoldering myeloma that require no therapy, to the “malignant” form of multiple myeloma. The role of imaging in the management of myeloma includes: an assessment of the extent of intramedullary bone disease, detection of any extramedullary foci, and severity of the disease at presentation; the identification and characterization of complications; subsequent assessment of disease status. This review will focus on the use of PET/CT and MR imaging for myeloma patients at the time of initial diagnosis and for follow-up management, based on current reports in the literature and our practice at the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore, USA.     

18F-FDG PET/CT对非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变诊断价值的Meta分析

 目的 采用Meta分析系统评价¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT对非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变的诊断价值。方法 计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中文科技期刊数据库,查找有关¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT对非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变的诊断性试验。由 2 位评价员按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Meta DiSc1.4软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入16篇文献,非小细胞肺癌3308例。病理确诊为肺腺癌2914例(88.09%),其他病理类型394例(11.91%)。Meta分析结果示,SEN合并=0.57[95%CI(0.55,0.60)],SPE合并=0.65[95%CI(0.62,0.67)],+LR合并=1.82[95%CI(1.49,2.23)],-LR合并=0.67[95%CI(0.59,0.76)],DOR合并=2.93[95%CI(2.08,4.15)],AUC=0.6678。结论 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT的SUV_max对NSCLC患者的EGFR突变有一定的预测能力,其特异度优于敏感度,可以用于EGFR突变的诊断。     

TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer

Purpose PET/CT, PET+CT, and CT were compared concerning accuracies in TNM staging and malignancy detection in head and neck cancer. The impact of PET/CT compared to the other imaging modalities on therapy management was assessed. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients with suspected head and neck primary cancer underwent whole-body FDG-PET/CT. PET/CT and PET+CT were evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist; CT was evaluated by two radiologists, PET by two nuclear physicians. Histopathology served as the standard of reference. Differences between the staging modalities were tested for statistical significance by McNemar’s test. Results Overall TNM-staging and T-staging with PET/CT were more accurate than PET+CT and CT alone (p < 0.05). PET/CT was marginally more accurate than CT alone in N-staging (p = 0.04); no statistically significant difference was found when compared to PET+CT for N-staging. PET/CT altered further treatment in 13 patients compared to CT only and in 7 patients compared to PET+CT. Conclusion Combined PET/CT proved to be partly more accurate in assessing the overall TNM-stage than CT and PET+CT. These results were based on a higher accuracy concerning the T-stage, mainly in patients with metallic implants and marginally the N-stage. Therapy decisions have been influenced in a substantial number of patients. PET/CT might be considered as a first line diagnostic tool in patients with suspected primary head and neck cancer.     

Integrated FDG-PET/CT vs. standard radiological examinations: Comparison of capability for assessment of postoperative recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to prospectively and directly compare diagnostic capabilities of whole-body integrated FDG-PET/CT and standard radiologic examination for assessment of recurrence in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 92 consecutive pathologically diagnosed NSCLC patients (65 males, 27 females; mean age, 71 years) underwent pathologically and surgically proven complete resection, followed by prospective whole-body FDG-PET/CT and standard radiological examinations. Final diagnosis of recurrence was based on the results of more than 1 year of follow-up and/or pathological examinations. On both methods, the probability of recurrence was assessed in each patient by using a five-point visual scoring system, and the each final diagnosis was made by consensus between two readers. Kappa analyses were performed to determine inter-observer agreement for both methods, and ROC analyses were used to compare capability of the two methods for assessment of postoperative recurrence on a per-patient basis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were also compared between PET/CT and standard radiological examination by means of McNemar's test.

Results

All inter-observer agreements were almost perfect (integrated PET/CT: κ = 0.89; standard radiological examination: κ = 0.81). There were no statistically significant differences in area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between integrated FDG-PET/CT and standard radiologic examinations (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Integrated FDG-PET/CT can be used for assessment of postoperative recurrence in NSCLC patients with accuracy as good as that of standard radiological examinations.