米非司酮配伍米索前列醇行药物流产的安全性评价

目的　评价米非司酮配伍米索前列醇行药物流产的安全性。方法　检索国内外 9个医学数据库及 9种中文期刊。采用循证医学的方法对收集有关药物流产安全性研究的文献 ,进行质量评价和数据提取 ;对数据不能合并进行分析时 ,则行定性系统评价。结果　共收集、纳入文献 10 1篇 ,病例 136 4例。其中为药物严重不良反应 115例 ( 8 4 3% ) ,包括药物过敏性和失血性休克、药物中毒性心律失常、抽搐及胎儿畸形等 ;一般不良反应 10 15例 ( 74 4 1% ) ,包括异常出血和轻、中度过敏反应等。系统评价提示 ,药物流产后出血量过多、腹痛、发热和眩晕的发生率比手术流产高 ,相对危险度(RR)及 95 %可信限 (CI)范围分别为 3 2 7,1 14～ 9 38;1 6 3,1 14～ 2 34;1 5 8,1 0 3～ 2 4 4 ;和1 36 ,1 0 6～ 1 75。药物流产后的出血时间比手术流产长 ,加权均数差 (WMD)为 6 4 9,95 %CI为6 0 8～ 7 80。药物流产有并发症者 177例 ( 12 98% ) ,包括滋养细胞疾病、宫腔粘连和继发不孕。为异位妊娠而误用药物流产者 5 7例 ( 4 18% )。结论　药物流产的严重不良反应发生率较低 ,不影响药物流产的临床应用 ,但需要健全监测药物流产不良反应的制度 ;减少药物流产后出血 ,是需要进一步研究的课题     

Acceptability and feasibility of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Nigeria

Objective

To examine the acceptability and feasibility of medical abortion in Nigeria.

Methods

In total, 250 women who were eligible for legal pregnancy termination with a gestational age of up to 63 days since last menstrual period were enrolled in Benin City and Zaria between May 2005 and October 2006. Participants received 200 mg of oral mifepristone in the clinic and then took 400 μg of oral misoprostol 2 days later—choosing to either return to the clinic or take it at home. Women returned 2 weeks later for an assessment of abortion status.

Results

The vast majority (96.3%) of women had successful complete abortions. Ultrasound was used to determine outcome in less than one-third (28.9%) of participants. Most women (83.2%) took the misoprostol at home. Almost all (96.2%) participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the abortion method.

Conclusion

The introduction of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol could greatly expand current method options and improve the quality of reproductive health care in Nigeria and other settings in which access to legal abortion services is limited.     

Efficacy and safety of mifepristone and buccal misoprostol versus buccal misoprostol alone for medical abortion

Objectives  

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and buccal misoprostol versus buccal misoprostol alone in medical abortion of ≤56 days.     

Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse effects and acceptability of the three most common misoprostol regimens used with mifepristone for medical abortion. DESIGN: Randomised nonblinded trial. SETTING: Three clinics associated with major research universities in Canada; two in major urban areas and one in a periurban area. POPULATION: Women of reproductive age. METHODS: Consenting women presenting for abortion services with gestations less than 56 days and who met inclusion criteria were given 200 mg mifepristone orally and then randomised into three misoprostol study groups: (group I) 400 micrograms of oral misoprostol, (group II) 600 micrograms of oral misoprostol, and (group III) 800 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol. Misoprostol was self-administered at home 24-48 hours following mifepristone, and participants were instructed to take a second similar misoprostol dose at 24 hours after the initial dose if bleeding was less than a normal menstrual period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful abortion without surgery was 94.1%, with no significant differences across the three study groups (94.7% in group I, 93.4% in group II, and 94.3% in group III; P= 0.975). RESULTS: Efficacy and adverse effects did not differ significantly across the three study groups. Pain increased significantly across the study and the gestational age groups and was associated with lower acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a range of safe and effective options for early medical abortion with mifepristone including a choice between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol.     

Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with mifepristone

OBJECTIVES: To compare the experience of pain, need of analgesic interventions, preference and acceptability in medical abortion up to 49 days of amenorrhea with mifepristone and orally versus vaginally administered misoprostol. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-seven women were randomised to oral misoprostol, n=48, or vaginal misoprostol, n=49. On day 1 of the study, both the groups received 600 mg of mifepristone. On day 3 of the study, one group received 0.4 mg of misoprostol orally and the other group received 0.8 mg of misoprostol vaginally. RESULTS: Even though oral administration of misoprostol seemed to be associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal side effects, women in both the groups showed a clear preference towards the oral route of administration. The willingness to administer the misoprostol at home was also higher among the women in the oral group, which may in part depend on a more positive/less negative experience of the abortion. CONCLUSION: A majority of women prefer oral administration of misoprostol in early medical abortion.     

Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: study of the efficacy,somatic tolerance and perception of medical abortion

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study examined the efficacy and somatic tolerance as well as the perception of the different phases of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. The subjective influence of counseling and accompanying on perception and psychic sequelae was evaluated. METHOD: The somatic data of the patients who had a medical abortion at Basel University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics from December 1, 1999, to October 31, 2000, were identified in the case records. A questionnaire at the time of the abortion and a structured interview by telephone 6 months later were used to assess the perception of the abortion. RESULTS: Abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol was successful in 95.2% of cases. Counseling and accompanying were considered supportive by 90.4 and 73.7%, respectively. The psychological workup was without problems in 95.5%. CONCLUSION: Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol was successful in 95.2%. Our concept of counseling and accompanying was well received and resulted in an uneventful psychological workup in most cases.     

Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of a regimen using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol with unlimited dosing for second trimester abortion in Armenia.

Methods: Women seeking to terminate 13–22 week pregnancies were enrolled in the study. Participants swallowed 200?mg mifepristone in the clinic and were instructed to return to the hospital for induction 24–48?h later. During induction, women were given 400?μg buccal misoprostol every 3?h until the fetus and placenta were expelled. The abortion was considered a success if complete uterine evacuation was achieved without oxytocin or surgery.

Results: A total of 120 women with a median gestational age of 18 weeks participated in the study. All women began misoprostol induction around 24?h after taking mifepristone. Complete uterine evacuation was achieved in 119 (99.2%) women. The median induction-to-abortion interval was 10.3?h (range 4–17.4) with a mean of 9.5?±?2.5?h. A median of four misoprostol doses (range 2–6) with a mean of 4?±?1 misoprostol doses were administered. The induction-to-abortion interval, number of misoprostol doses, pain score and analgesia use increased as gestational age advanced. Acceptability of the method was high among both patients and providers.

Conclusion: The medical abortion regimen of 200?mg mifepristone followed 24?h later by induction with 400?μg buccal misoprostol administered every 3?h, with no limit on the number of doses used for the termination of pregnancies of 13–22 weeks’ gestation is an effective and acceptable option for women.     

Early medical abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the introduction of an early medical abortion program with methotrexate and misoprostol, using a standardized protocol. METHODS: A total of 1973 women at 34 Planned Parenthood sites participated in a case series of early medical abortion. Ultrasound was used to confirm gestational age of less than 49 days from the first day of the last menstrual period. Women were given intramuscular methotrexate 50 mg/m(2) of body surface area on day 1, and then they inserted misoprostol 800 microg vaginally at home on day 5, 6, or 7. Women were advised to have a suction curettage if the pregnancy appeared viable 2 weeks after methotrexate or if any gestational sac persisted 4 weeks after methotrexate. Outcomes were complete medical abortion and suction curettage. RESULTS: Sixteen hundred fifty-nine women (84.1%) had a complete medical abortion, and 257 (13.0%) had suction curettage. The most common reason for curettage was patient option (8.9%). At 2 weeks after methotrexate use, 1.4% of women had curettage because of a viable pregnancy; at 4 weeks, 1.6% of women had curettage because of a persistent but nonviable pregnancy. One percent of women had curettage because of physician recommendation, most commonly for bleeding. Suction curettage rates decreased with site experience (P <.006) and were lower at early gestational ages (P <.004) and in nulliparous women (P <.004). CONCLUSION: Medical abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol is safe and effective and can be offered in a community setting.     

Use of various ultrasonographic criteria to evaluate the efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether applying modern formulas for mean sac diameter and crown-rump length to data from the recently published US mifepristone-misoprostol abortion trial would result in differences in assigned gestational ages and a higher rate of complete abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the US mifepristone-misoprostol trial were reanalyzed. The ultrasonographic findings at baseline examination of the 2121 participants were used to estimate gestational age according to criteria established by Rossavik et al for mean sac diameter and by Robinson and Fleming, Hadlock et al, and Goldstein and Wolfson for embryonic pole. The gestational ages as assigned by the different criteria were then compared and the treatment outcomes at various gestational ages were calculated for each of the dating criteria. These findings were compared with those reported in the original study. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of study subjects were assigned to the incorrect gestational age group according to the criteria used for the original report. Still, outcomes according to gestational age group were similar regardless of which ultrasonographic gestational age criteria were used and were comparable to those calculated in the original report. Overall efficacy for subjects at 相似文献   

延长米非司酮配伍米索前列醇序贯用药时间预防流产后出血的 …

目的 探讨米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止早孕的最佳剂量方案,以预防流产后出血,方法 对１６１２例妊娠≤４９天,要求药物终止妊娠的妇女,按２：１随机分为观察组,对照组。观察组１１８例,米非司酮首次剂量５０ｍｇ,继后每１２ｈ１次,每次２５ｍｇ（共６ｄ）,总剂量３００ｍｇ,于用药第３天晨加用米索前列醇６００μｇ,第４￣６天晨各加服２００μｇ,总量１２００μｇ。对照组４９４例,米非司酮首次剂量５０ｍｇ,继后第     

A two-stage increase in the dose of misoprostol improves the efficacy of medical abortion with mifepristone and prostaglandins

Objective?To compare the efficacy and side effects of three regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester abortion.

Methods?A total of 118 women requiring second-trimester pregnancy termination were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: 400?μg 3-hourly in group A (n?=?39), 600?μg 6-hourly in group B (n?=?39), and 800?μg 12-hourly in group C (n?=?40). Misoprostol tablets moistened with 3?ml of 5% acetic acid were placed into the posterior vaginal fornix.

Results?The median induction-abortion times in groups A (8?h [range: 3–64]) and B (9?h [4–81]) were significantly shorter (p?p?p?Conclusions?Misoprostol moistened with acetic acid is effective for second-trimester pregnancy termination when given vaginally 3-hourly, 6-hourly or 12-hourly. The former two regimens are significantly more effective than the latter.