Cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the anatomical and surgical factors related to cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Two independent reviewers performed an unrestricted electronic database search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to and including August 2018. Thirty-two articles were selected for data extraction and synthesis: 30 studies were identified in the main search and two by a manual search. The level of agreement between the reviewers was considered excellent (κ = 0.779 for study selection and κ = 0.767 for study eligibility). This study revealed that the main nerve affected was the trigeminal nerve, followed by the oculomotor, abducens, optic, facial, and vagus and accessory nerves. Cleft lip and palate patients presented the highest incidence of cranial nerve damage. Cranial nerve damage after Le Fort I osteotomy is not rare. Anatomical and structural knowledge of the patient are necessary in order to minimize the risks of cranial nerve injury in Le Fort I osteotomy.     

Surgical complications of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy

Segmental maxillary osteotomy is a useful adjunct in orthognathic surgery for the correction of vertical and transverse maxillary deformities, but we know of few published reports that document complications. We evaluated the complication rates associated with segmental maxillary surgery in our unit by retrospective review of medical records, radiographs, and study models of 85 consecutive patients (mean age 23.3 years, range 14–51; male:female ratio 1:2) treated from 1995 to 2009. Types of deformity were anterior open bite (n = 30, 35%), transverse maxillary deficiency (n = 24, 28%), anterior open bite with transverse maxillary deficiency (n = 28, 33%), and anterior vertical maxillary excess (n = 3, 4%). There were 70 tripartite (82%), 13 bipartite (15%), and two quadripartite (2%) maxillas. Twenty-one patients (25%) had bone grafts. Fixation was done using titanium miniplates in 80 patients (94%), and titanium miniplates and resorbable plates in five (6%). The overall complication rate was 27%. Three patients (4%) had devitalisation of teeth, three (4%) developed minor periodontal defects, and one had tooth loss. Eight patients (9%) had plates removed, and two patients developed persistent postoperative palatal fistula. There was no segmental loss of bone or teeth. Our results show that complications in this cohort were relatively low, and that segmental maxillary surgery is safe as an adjunct in carefully selected cases.     

Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of tooth injury after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy

The purpose of this study was to explore the incidence of injuries to the teeth at the vertical osteotomy line after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy by examination of postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Data for this retrospective case study were collected using CBCT images of 132 patients with an indication for Le Fort I osteotomy with three-piece segmentation of the maxilla. Twenty-two patients (17%, 95% confidence interval 10–23%) had dental injuries. No patient had more than one dental injury. Thirty-three patients (25%, 95% confidence interval 18–32%) had bone dehiscence of the teeth (defined as the osteotomy line passing through the periodontal ligament). Six patients had bone dehiscence involving two teeth and one patient had bone dehiscence involving three teeth. In the group in which dental injuries occurred, the preoperative interdental distance at the vertical osteotomy line was significantly shorter than the interdental distance in the group without dental injuries. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a preoperative interdental distance of more than 2.5 mm significantly reduced the possibility of tooth injuries adjacent to the vertical osteotomy line during Le Fort I osteotomy with three-piece segmentation of the maxilla.     

Late onset of abducens palsy after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy

Abducens nerve palsy after low-level Le Fort 1 maxillary osteotomy is a rare complication, but with few cases reported, its true incidence is not known. We report an unusual case of late postoperative onset of abducens palsy that differs from existing case reports.     

Time-course change in temporomandibular joint space after advancement and setback mandibular osteotomy with Le Fort I osteotomy

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare time-course changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space between mandibular advancement surgery and setback surgery after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and Le Fort I osteotomy.

Role of Le Fort type I osteotomy approach in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma

Le Fort type I osteotomy is a fracture that extends from the pyriform aperture to each of the pterygoid plates, resulting in the detachment of the upper jaw from the cranial base. A retrospective study was conducted on 12 patients with juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) who underwent the Le Fort type I approach. Preoperatively, all cases were investigated with computed tomographic scans with contrast and angiography with embolisation. This paper highlights the surgical technique, results and treatment morbidity. The average age of the patients was 21 years, average duration of surgery was 3.2h and average blood loss was 550 ml. All cases had significant symptomatic improvement postoperatively. At 1 year follow up, the authors encountered dental malocclusion in one case and no recurrence of JNA. The Le Fort I osteotomy approach is an excellent approach for the excision of JNA because it allows good surgical exposure, better haemostasis, is cosmetically more acceptable and has a very low morbidity.     

Adie's pupil following Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy: case report

Complications after Le Fort I osteotomy are rare. We report, to our knowledge, the first case of bilateral Adie's pupil after Le Fort I osteotomy.     

Horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with endosteal implants — a median-term follow-up study

Fourteen patients with Class VI resorption of the maxilla were treated with horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy. In 11 cases, the procedure was followed by the placement of endosteal implants. In six patients, simultaneous placement of implants was carried out, while in five patients this was done in a second procedure. Ten patients wore their implant-supported dentures. In one patient, 5/8 implants were lost due to nonintegration. Three patients lost one implant each. The total number of implants placed was 76, and the survival rate of the implants was 88.1%. In the one-step procedure (n=42), the survival rate was 84.8%; in the two-step procedure (n=34), 92.3%. In comparison of the one-step to the two-step procedure, there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.11) between the amount of marginal peri-implant bone loss and the condition of the peri-implant soft tissues as measured 2 years after implantation.     

Fractures of the atrophic, edentulous maxilla during Le Fort I osteotomy

The incidence of unfavorable fractures of the maxilla during Le Fort I osteotomy was compared between patients with atrophic, edentulous maxillae and patients with normal dentate maxillae. Unfavorable fractures frequently occurred in atrophic, edentulous maxillae. The most common maxillary fracture involved the junction of the horizontal plate of the palatine bone and posterior part of the maxilla. Prevention strategies and treatment options are discussed.     

Biomechanical evaluation of two miniplate fixations applied in the anterior region after Le Fort I osteotomy: an experimental study

The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the reliability of two-plate fixations applied to the anterior region of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy in terms of stability. Twenty polyurethane-based skull models were used to evaluate two fixation techniques. Two groups consisting of four and two L-shaped titanium miniplates were tested. Each group was tested with the application of vertical forces in the anteroposterior direction using a servohydraulic testing unit. The displacement values in each group at each stage (from 10 N - 120 N) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The displacement values for the two groups were not statistically significant up to 20 N, but differed significantly between 20 N and 120 N (p < 0.05). The results showed that the biomechanical behaviour of fixation with four miniplates was better than that of two after a load of 20 N. It can be concluded that when the amount of maxillary advancement is increased to 10 mm or more, fixation with only two plates does not provide sufficient stability experimentally.     

上颌骨Le Fort I型截骨进路切除巨大鼻咽纤维血管瘤

目的:探讨上颌骨LeFortI型截骨进路切除累及翼腭凹、颞下凹巨大鼻咽纤维血管肿瘤的可行性。方法:采用矫正上颌骨先天或后天畸形的LeFortI型截骨术式进路,切除位于鼻咽部、筛窦等深在部位的纤维血管瘤。结果:该进路术野显露充分,取得了理想的治疗效果。结论:上颌骨LeFortI型截骨进路是切除鼻咽、颅底部纤维血管瘤的理想进路。     

Reaching the vertical versus horizontal target position in multi-segmental Le Fort I osteotomy is more difficult,but yields comparably stable results to one-segment osteotomy

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the postoperative outcomes of preoperatively planned positional changes for Le Fort I osteotomy in 77 patients (average age 26.6 years). Movement relapse and planning accuracy were evaluated by lateral cephalometric analysis, with an average follow-up of 257 days. In one-segment osteotomy cases, 73% of the horizontal movements were positioned within 2 mm of the surgical plan. With posterior–inferior repositioning of the maxilla, results fell within 2 mm of the prescribed plan in 60% of cases. Maxillary advancement and superior repositioning proved more stable than inferior maxillary repositioning. Relapse did not differ between three-piece and one-piece osteotomies for any movements; however, in three-piece cases, only half of the positional changes on average stayed within 2 mm of the prescribed surgical plan. Relapse did not vary with bone grafting among the groups. To summarize, in most Le Fort I osteotomy cases, the surgical plan is achieved within 2 mm, with posterior extrusion of the maxilla showing the greatest deviation both in reaching the target and maintaining the result achieved. Although maxillary segmentation makes the surgical plan more difficult to achieve, the results are at least as stable as those of one-piece osteotomies.     

Trans oral approach to the nasopharynx and clivus using the Le Fort I osteotomy with midpalatal split

The Le Fort I level osteotomy is a procedure well known to oral and maxillofacial surgeons, who routinely use it to correct midfacial skeletal deformities and alter the dental occlusion. This osteotomy can also be used as a maxillotomy for access to more superiorly and posteriorly situated structures. The downfracture technique provides the surgeon with a safe approach that allows visualization of the maxillary sinuses, nasal cavity, nasopharynx, base of the skull and upper cervical spine. This approach can also be combined with a midline lip split, mandibulotomy and glossotomy to give access to retropharyngeal structures. By modifying the combined Le Fort I and transmandibular approach utilizing a midline split of the hard and soft palate, the access to the clivus can be improved considerably. The clinical applications of these combined procedures in the treatment of basilar invagination and tumors of the nasopharynx are discussed.     

Higher need for removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece versus one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy: A retrospective study of 339 patients

The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece Le Fort I osteotomy compared to standard one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy (LF1).Medical files of patients treated with multi-piece or one-piece LF1 were retrospectively reviewed, including the indication for removal and time between insertion and removal. A total of 339 patients were included: 290 patients with LF1 and 49 patients with multi-piece LF1.Patients undergoing multi-piece LF1 had 2.7-times significantly higher (p < 0.001) relative risk of osteosynthesis removal in the upper jaw (42.9%) than patients undergoing LF1 (15.9%). Significant independent predictors of removal of osteosynthesis material after multi-piece LF1 were older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–1.2; p = 0.028), simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (OR 7.8, 95% CI 1.2–50.3; p = 0.031), and no previous surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03–0.69; p = 0.15).Significantly higher removal rates of osteosynthesis material were found after multi-piece LF1. Therefore, all patients must be informed of the higher risk for removal of osteosynthesis material when undergoing a multi-piece LF1.     

Comparison of scleral show alterations following Le Fort I osteotomy with either maxillary impaction or lengthening

This study aimed at evaluating changes in scleral show following Le Fort I osteotomy with either impaction or lengthening of the mid face. Patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy were included. The patients were divided according to the direction of the movement: group 1 underwent maxillary advancement and impaction, while group 2 underwent maxillary advancement and lengthening. Standardized preoperative and 6-month postoperative photos were superimposed using Microsoft PowerPoint. The inferior visible scleral area was assessed with landmarks and measured separately using ImageJ software. Marked scleral surface area was determined using pixel count. A total of 36 consecutive patients were included. The mean maxillary advancement in the patients was 4.16 ± 2.14 mm. The mean impaction in group 1 (n= 21) was 1.06 ± 1.49 mm, while the mean vertical lengthening in group 2 (n = 15) was 1.54 ± 1.65 mm. The difference in improvement in the inferior scleral show between the groups was not statistically significant. Preoperative (180 ± 118.2 mm) and postoperative (147.75 ± 92.2 mm) scleral show significantly improved (p = 0.012) in both groups. Scleral show can be overlooked for movements under 6 mm while planning for maxillary orthognathic movement, as it improves regardless of the desired movement.     

Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用与评价

目的:观察分析Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用效果.方法:回顾2004年3月至2006年12月武汉大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科收治的唇腭裂患者的临床资料,并进行总结与分析,所有患者均进行了以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗.结果:共收集相关病例16例,其中男9例,女7例,平均年龄22.4岁.术前∠SNA平均73.2°,术后LSNA平均79.5°;上颌前移距离平均8.13mm.平均随访时间7.3个月.所有患者术后面容改善明显,经正畸治疗后咬合关系满意.结论:以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗,可以显著改善唇腭裂患者的颌骨与面容畸形.     

Three-dimensional analysis of nasolabial soft tissue changes after Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review of the literature

A systematic review was conducted to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) effect of Le Fort I osteotomy on the nasolabial soft tissues. The literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases until January 2018. A total of 333 studies were identified (PubMed, n = 292; Embase, n = 41; Cochrane Library, n = 0). Seventeen met the inclusion criteria. The studies were essentially retrospective. The risk of bias was considered high in 15 studies, medium in one study, and low in one study. 3D soft tissue analysis was performed at least 6 months after surgery (mean 8.3 months). The main image acquisition technique reported was cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), associated or not with 3D photography. Approximately 50% of the studies performed two-jaw surgery, 25% performed maxillary surgery only, and the other 25% included heterogeneous intervention groups. The most reported nasolabial changes were anterior and lateral movements of the nasomaxillary soft tissues and upper lip, together with anterior and superior movement of the nasal tip. The alar cinch suture and V–Y closure technique seemed to have little effect in counteracting the undesirable postoperative nasolabial changes. CBCT superimposition presented a reliable 3D assessment for simultaneous measurement of skeletal and soft tissue changes.     

Maxillary sinus recovery and nasal ventilation after Le Fort I osteotomy: a prospective clinical,endoscopic, functional and radiographic evaluation

The condition of the maxillary sinus is not routinely assessed before a Le Fort I osteotomy. Performing this procedure in an infected sinus might account for a considerable proportion of the complications, such as excessive bleeding and sinusitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the maxillary sinus and nasal ventilation after Le Fort I osteotomy. Twenty patients were evaluated before and 2 months after surgery using validated questionnaires for sinonasal complaints (RSOM-31 and VAS score), nasal endoscopy, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and a computed tomography (CT) scan. There were no differences in complaints before and 2 months after surgery (P > 0.24). Also, the PNIF did not change significantly (P = 0.10). On CT evaluation before surgery, a previously unnoted sinusitis was diagnosed in two patients. Postoperatively, a thickened sinus mucosa was present in all patients near the osteotomy line, the osteosyntheses, and around sequesters. This report describes maxillary sinus evaluation after Le Fort I osteotomy in a more comprehensive way by using CT. The Le Fort I procedure did not influence already existing physical or mental complaints, and nasal ventilation was not negatively affected. However, evaluation of sinonasal pathology should be emphasized in the preoperative work-up.