Evidence on how to practice intersectoral collaboration for health equity: a scoping review

The persistence of health inequities is reflected in repeated calls for intersectoral collaboration on the social determinants of health, specifically through public policy action. Yet, how to do intersectoral collaboration specifically for policy action toward health equity is articulated rather scarcely in the scientific literature. With this scoping review, we intended to generate insight into current peer-reviewed literature to identify gaps about evidence-based approaches to practices of intersectoral collaboration for health equity-oriented policy action. Seven search engines were used: Proquest, Web of Science, CINAHL, Pubmed, Sociological Abstracts, Project Muse and ERIC. Social determinants of health, including public policy and intersectoral collaboration, are related concepts for the health equity agenda and were used as a conceptual framework to map selected literature. Out of 227 articles, our review identified 64 articles describing intersectoral collaboration specifically in relation to public policy. Of those articles with a policy topic, 10 had a focus on broad public policy areas, while 51 publications articulated specific policies relevant to the determinants of health and only three articles examined effective practices of intersectoral collaboration in public policy through phenomenology, literature review and case study research. The majority of policy-focused publications described that collaboration was used as a strategy to address intersectoral public policy issues, but failed to report how the process of collaboration unfolded. Perhaps it is time to re-direct the gaze onto collaborative teams to generate evidence of effective intersectoral collaboration practices in public policy.     

Ambiguous expectations for intersectoral action for health: a document analysis of the Danish case

Ideas about intersectoral action and policy-making for health (ISA) are prominent among public health professionals. They are often presented as effective ways to address root causes of poor health and health inequality, and as such the best way to promote population health. The implementation of such ideas has proven difficult though. In this paper we argue that neo-institutional theory can help us conceptualize implementation challenges by pointing to implicit expectations and contradictions associated with the ISA idea itself. With Denmark as empirical case, we conducted a document analysis of recommendations for municipal ISA. The analysis shows how the recommendations provide a very abstract conceptualization of ISA that does not give much practical guidance for action. We show how ISA is discursively constructed with buzzword qualities as the natural way to organize health promotion, by being presented as a means to produce better quality services, more cost-effective operations and ensure the future of the welfare state, while at the same time hardly changing much at all. By applying the lens of institutional logics we show how ISA, although being vaguely defined, offer ambiguous normative and symbolic repertoires for action. We discuss the implementation challenges associated with this advocacy rhetoric and suggest that the domination of the corporation logic may appear to reduce the political character of ISA and potentially conflict with the ideals of health as a matter of social justice and human rights.     

A review of UK housing policy: ideology and public health

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to review UK public health policy, with a specific reference to housing as a key health determinant, since its inception in the Victorian era to contemporary times. REVIEW: This paper reviews the role of social and private housing policy in the development of the UK public health movement, tracing its initial medical routes through to the current socio-economic model of public health. The paper establishes five distinct ideologically and philosophically driven eras, placing public health and housing within liberal (Victorian era), state interventionist (post World War 1; post World War 2), neoliberal (post 1979) and "Third Way" (post 1997) models, showing the political perspective of policy interventions and overviewing their impact on public health. The paper particularly focuses on the contemporary model of public health since the Acheson Report, and how its recommendations have found their way into policy, also the impact on housing practice. CONCLUSIONS: Public health is closely related to political ideology, whether driven by the State, individual or partnership arrangements. The current political system, the Third Way, seeks to promote a sustainable "social contract" between citizens and the State, public, private and voluntary organizations in delivering community-based change in areas where health inequalities can be most progressively and successfully addressed.     

Understanding the challenges of intersectoral action in public health through a case study of early childhood programmes and services

After two decades of intersectoral public health action, the literature reports considerable ongoing difficulty in achieving this aim. This article analyses two of the challenges of intersectoral action: (1) ensuring convergence among the interests and resources of sectoral actors, and (2) coordinating the multiplicity of sectoral programmes. A case study employing Actor–Network Theory is used to provide an in-depth understanding of the persistence of these problems. In 2008, the Montreal Directorate of Public Health in the province of Quebec, Canada, implemented a vast consultation and mobilization process to address problems highlighted by the Survey of the School Readiness of Montreal Children. The process mobilized regional and local multi-sectoral actors in order to propose solutions. At the local community level, the process resulted in increased coordination leading to intersectoral innovation, while at the regional level it brought about the deployment of additional resources, albeit in sectoral programmes. This study analyses how intersectoral issues raised by the survey have been addressed so as to produce these results. It discusses how the balance between sectoral interests and the common good, as well as between sector autonomy and interdependence, is central to dealing with these two critical challenges.     

A research impact model for work and health

Research organizations, governments and funding agencies are increasingly interested in the impact of research beyond academia. While a growing literature describes research impacts in healthcare and health services, little has focused on occupational health and safety research. This article describes a research impact model that has been in use for over a decade. The model was developed to track and describe the impact of research conducted by a mid‐sized institute that focuses on work and health. Model development was informed by existing models, with the goal of contextualizing the institute's case studies describing three types of research impact: evidence of the diffusion of research; evidence of research informing decision‐making; and evidence of societal impact. A logic model describes research actions and outcomes, as well as key audiences and knowledge transfer approaches. A unique element is its indication of the level of difficulty in determining types of impact. The model compares well with current research impact models developed or used in healthcare and health services research, and it has been useful in guiding a mid‐sized research organization's process for tracking and describing the impact of its research. It may be useful to other small and mid‐sized research organizations that focus on workplace health and safety.     

A new approach to prison public health? Challenging and advancing the agenda for prison health

This paper explores recent developments in prison public health, recommending that future prison health policies and practices become more ‘upstream’ in their outlook and approach. It is argued that this will require much firmer acknowledgement of the significance of broad, systemic and structural determinants of prisoner health, particularly if the World Health organization's vision for a ‘healthy prison’ is to be realized. Epidemiological evidence plainly shows that prisoners have experienced—and continue to experience—worse health than the general population, despite the fact that prison settings across the European Union have been targeted for health promotion by the World Health Organization since 1994. In 2005, WHO launched a new 10-year prison public health plan, which it envisages will begin to address key prison health determinants. In the UK, New Labour has identified prison health as a key public health objective within Choosing Health, although health interventions within prisons continue to be predominantly geared towards efficient and effective primary and secondary healthcare, and much less towards public health goals. This paper strives to open up the debate on prison public health, advocating a progressive and more sustainable approach to developing and commissioning health services for prisoners.     

Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan

Background

People with literacy needs can experience many challenges in accessing, understanding and using health services and health information. Such challenges can adversely impact patient-provider interactions and ultimately, health outcomes. Healthcare providers need to be aware of health literacy (HL) to address the demands of healthcare systems, improve their interactions with communities and patients and promote patient engagement for improved health outcomes.

Methods

This paper reports on a process of patient and public involvement (PPI) with participants in an adult literacy programme acting as PPI contributors to identify priority areas for a local hospital HL action plan and to develop a protocol for a PPI process with other groups. A qualitative community-based participatory research study design informed by principles of PPI was undertaken, drawing on the tools of participatory and visual methods, open discussion and workshop format to facilitate a process of co-creation. Three workshops with six PPI contributors took place to identify issues to be included in the hospital action plan. PPI contributors identified issues and grouped these into priority areas using discussion and ranking procedures.

Results

Key areas prioritised for HL action by the PPI contributors were: verbal communication, emphasising the patient's right to understand, and improved understanding of medication use. These were incorporated into the action plan. The workshop format and process were deemed acceptable to the group and input on improvements will be incorporated into further work in this area.

Conclusion

PPI acts as a lever in the knowledge translation process. Genuine engagement with service users can meaningfully contribute to relevant and sustainable changes to services as well as foster the empowerment of service users.

Patient or Public Contribution

Members of the public with literacy needs actively participated in the co-creation of a HL action plan for a local hospital and in the development of a protocol for a patient and public process for HL research.     

Epistemological barriers to addressing the social determinants of health among public health professionals in Ontario,Canada: a qualitative inquiry

To date, Ontario public health units (PHUs) have generally neglected the social determinants of health (SDH) concept in favor of risk aversion and behaviorally oriented health promotion approaches. Addressing SDH and responding to the presence of health inequities is required under the Ontario Public Health Standards and is a component of provincial public health documents and reports. Nevertheless, units vary in their understanding and application of the SDH concept in their activities. The authors conducted 18 interviews with Medical Officers of Health and lead staff persons from nine Ontario PHUs, in order to better understand how these differences in addressing the SDH among health units come about. The findings suggest that differences in practice largely result from epistemological variations: conceptions of the SDH; the perceived role of public health in addressing them; and understandings concerning the validity of differing forms of evidence and expected outcomes. Drawing from Bachelard’s concept of epistemological barriers and Raphael’s seven discourses on the SDH, we examine the ways in which the participating units discuss and apply the SDH concepts. We argue that a substantial barrier to further action on the SDH is the internalization of discourses and traditions that treat health as individualized and depoliticized.     

Ten years of Pan-InfORM: modelling research for public health in Canada

Modelling and simulation methods can play an important role in guiding public health responses to infectious diseases and emerging health threats by projecting the plausible outcomes of decisions and interventions. The 2003 SARS epidemic marked a new chapter in disease modelling in Canada as it triggered a national discussion on the utility and uptake of modelling research in local and pandemic outbreaks. However, integration and application of model-based outcomes in public health requires knowledge translation and contextualization. We reviewed the history and performance of Pan-InfORM (Pandemic Influenza Outbreak Research Modelling), which created a national infrastructure in Canada with a mandate to develop innovative knowledge translation methodologies to inform policy makers through modelling frameworks that bridge the gaps between theory, policy, and practice. This review demonstrates the importance of a collaborative infrastructure as a “Community of Practice” to guide public health responses, especially in the context of emerging diseases with substantial uncertainty, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Dedicated resources to modelling and knowledge translation activities can help create synergistic strategies at the global scale and optimize public health responses to protect at-risk populations and quell socioeconomic and health burden.     

健康中国的新征程——公共健康的时代性与紧迫性

"构建起强大的公共卫生体系"已成为新时代、新征程的紧迫任务.基于8年多系列的系统研究认为,要迈向"构建起强大的公共卫生体系"需重点关注5个方面:一是应当转变观念,统一思想,将"公共卫生"转变为"公共健康",将"公共卫生体系"转变为"公共健康体系",引领体系建设和发展;二是应当走适宜公共健康体系的发展道路,不断提升健康治...     

Lost in translation: a genealogy of the "social capital" concept in public health

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the genealogy of the social capital concept in public health, with attention to the epistemological concerns and academic practices that shaped the way in which this concept was translated into public health. DESIGN: A citation-network path analysis of the public health literature on social capital was used to generate a genealogy of the social capital concept in public health. The analysis identifies the intellectual sources, influential texts, and developments in the conceptualisation of social capital in public health. PARTICIPANTS: The population of 227 texts (articles, books, reports) was selected in two phases. Phase 1 texts were articles in the PubMed database with "social capital" in their title published before 2003 (n = 65). Phase 2 texts are those texts cited more than once by phase 1 articles (n = 165). MAIN RESULTS: The analysis shows how the scholarship of Robert Putnam has been absorbed into public health research, how three seminal texts appearing in 1996 and 1997 helped shape the communitarian form that the social capital concept has assumed in public health, and how both were influenced by the epistemological context of social epidemiology at the time. CONCLUSIONS: Originally viewed in public health research as an ecological level, psychosocial mechanism that might mediate the income inequality-health pathway, the dominance of the communitarian approach to social capital has given disproportionate attention to normative and associational properties of places. Network approaches to social capital were lost in this translation. Recovering them is key to a full translation and conceptualisation of social capital in public health.     

Knowledge translation in biostatistics: a survey of current practices,preferences, and barriers to the dissemination and uptake of new statistical methods

Background: The use of standard statistical methods in the medical literature has been studied extensively; however, the adoption of new methods has received less attention. We sought to understand (i) whether there is a perception that new methods are underused, (ii) what the barriers to use of new methods are, (iii) what dissemination activities are used, and (iv) user preferences for learning about new methods. Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional survey of members of the Statistical Society of Canada (SSC) and of principal investigators (knowledge‐users) funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Results: There were 157 CIHR respondents (14% response rate), and 39 respondents were statisticians from the Statistical Society of Canada. Seventy percent of CIHR respondents and 82% of statisticians felt that new developments were under‐used. Barriers to use of new methods included lack of access to the necessary expertise (selected by over 90% of respondents), lack of suitable software (selected by 81% of statisticians), and lack of time to implement new methods (selected by 78% of statisticians). Greater access to statistical colleagues with an interest in collaboration and availability of software to implement new methods were the top‐rated preferences among knowledge‐users. Conclusions: There was a clear perception among all respondents that new statistical methods are underused. Encouraging statistical methodologists to develop a knowledge translation plan for improved dissemination and uptake, placing greater value on the role of the statistical collaborator in research, and providing software alongside new methods may improve the use of newly developed statistical methods. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Promoting social responsibility for health: health impact assessment and healthy public policy at the community level

The 1997 Jakarta Declaration on Health Promotion into the 21st Century called for new responses to address the emerging threats to health. The declaration placed a high priority on promoting social responsibility for health, and it identified equity-focused health impact assessment as a high priority for action. This theme was among the foci at the 2000 Fifth Global Conference on Health Promotion held in Mexico. This paper, which is an abbreviation of a technical report prepared for the Mexico conference, advances arguments for focusing on health impact assessment at the local level. Health impact assessment identifies negative health impacts that call for policy responses, and identifies and encourages practices and policies that promote health. Health impact assessment may be highly technical and require sophisticated technology and expertise. But it can also be a simple, highly practical process, accessible to ordinary people, and one that helps a community come to grips with local circumstances that need changing for better health. To illustrate the possibilities, this paper presents a case study, the People Assessing Their Health (PATH) project from Eastern Nova Scotia, Canada. It places ordinary citizens, rather than community elites, at the very heart of local decision-making. Evidence from PATH demonstrates that low technology health impact assessment, done by and for local people, can shift thinking beyond the illness problems of individuals. It can bring into consideration, instead, how programmes and policies support or weaken community health, and illuminate a community's capacity to improve local circumstances for better health. This stands in contrast to evidence that highly technological approaches to community-level health impact assessment can be self-defeating. Further development of simple, people-centred, low technology approaches to health impact assessment at the local level is called for.     

General practice and public health: Assessing the impact of the new GMS contract

Over the past 30 years, the important role of primary care in public health has been widely recognised, and in the UK a range of measures to support public health in general practice have been introduced since the late 1980s. In 2004 a new general medical services contract was introduced changing the way general practitioners are reimbursed in the NHS. The new contract shifted the emphasis from the individual practitioner to the practice and introduced a new performance incentive framework, the Quality Outcomes Framework, which rewards performance through targeted financial payments. The performance framework identifies specific areas of clinical and organisational performance and patient experience activities–including a number of health promotion activities–and practices attract points for attaining performance targets. This paper examines the experience and impact of the new GMS contract on public health activities in general practice. While the contract has only been operating for three full years, there is emerging evidence to suggest that it may have a negative impact on public health activities in general practice. The use of financial incentives appears to be skewing practice towards areas that are rewarded, which may not be those that maximise health outcomes, and there is some emerging evidence suggesting that there is a negative effect on health inequalities. This paper reviews current evidence on public health incentives in general practice within a wider context of the impact of incentives for public health.     

The effect of market reforms and new public management mechanisms on the Swiss health care system

In 1996, the Federal Law on Health Insurance (LAMal) was adopted in order to contain costs in Swiss health care. At the same time, the reform aimed to maintain or even improve solidarity and encourage institutional reform through new public management (NPM) and market mechanisms. More freedom in contractual conditions between insurers and providers and a clearer distinction of responsibilities between federal and regional (cantonal) authorities were stipulated to achieve efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency. The focus of this paper is an analysis of the effects of market reforms and NPM mechanisms introduced with the LAMal on the cost‐containment, quality of care and equity objectives in the Swiss health care system. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Putting public health infrastructures to the test: introducing HPV vaccination in Austria and the Netherlands

This article presents two cases of policymaking concerning the vaccine against Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), which is sexually transmitted and carcinogenic. Our analysis focuses on its introduction in Austria and the Netherlands. In both contexts, we find prevention and screening to be at once complementary and competing public health logics and we draw on the concept of ‘infrastructure’ to understand their roles in shaping the reception of the vaccine. We reveal how the HPV vaccine had to be made ‘good enough’, much like the Pap smear (Casper and Clarke 1998 ), by means of diverse tinkering practices that transformed both the technology and the infrastructures in which they emerged. At the same time, it was important that the vaccine would not come to problematise Pap smear‐based screening. The article points to the contextually contingent nature of policymaking around new medical technologies, and the skillful care with which public health infrastructures such as immunisation and screening programmes are handled and tinkered with.