Effects of Swedish massage on gait spatiotemporal parameters in adult women with medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are always faced with functional limitations in daily activities due to knee pain. They are also at risk of falling because of compensatory kinetics and kinematics changes in walking, which is why they are seeking complementary therapies to deal with their problems.ObjectiveThe present research aimed to evaluate whether Swedish massage is effective in relieving the symptoms of knee OA and improving the gait spatiotemporal parameters of patients with knee OA.MethodsThirty adult women with knee OA participated in this study voluntarily. The intervention group (n = 15) received Swedish massage on their quadriceps for 20–30 min per session (12 sessions). During this period, the control group (n = 15) received their regular treatment. Osteoarthritis symptoms were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The spatiotemporal parameters of gait were also captured by the motion analysis system during barefoot walking.ResultsThe intervention group demonstrated significantly more pain relief and improved function compared to the control group. A significant increase was observed in the gait speed, total support time, and single support time (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significant decrease in the step width and initial double support time of the patients after receiving Swedish massage (P < 0.05).ConclusionIt can be concluded that Swedish massage may positively affect pain relief and function improvement in patients with knee OA. Also, Swedish massage was found to improve the spatiotemporal parameters in the patients. This may have important clinical implications regarding the rehabilitation of patients with knee OA.     

A comparison of two manual physical therapy approaches and electrotherapy modalities for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized three arm clinical trial

A broad spectrum of physical therapy exercise programs provides symptom relief and functional benefit for patients with knee OA. Manual physical therapy, including tailored exercise programs provide relatively higher level benefit that persists to one year. It is currently unknown if there are important differences in the effects of different manual physical therapy techniques for patients with knee OA and there are virtually no studies comparing manual physical therapy and electrotherapy modalities. The aim of the study was to compare long-term results between three treatment groups (mobilization with movements [MWMs], passive joint mobilization [PJM], and electrotherapy) to determine which treatment is most effective in patients with knee OA. A single-blind randomized clinical trial with parallel design was conducted in patients with knee OA. Seventy-two consecutive patients (mean age 56.11 ± 6.80 years) with bilateral knee OA were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: MWMs, PJM, and electrotherapy. All groups performed an exercise program and received 12 sessions. The primary outcome measures of the functional assessment were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) test scores. The secondary outcome measures were pain level, measured using a pressure algometer and a visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), measured using a digital goniometer, and muscle strength, evaluated with a handheld dynamometer. Patients were assessed before treatment, after treatment and after 1 year of follow-up. Patients receiving the manual physical therapy interventions consisting of either MWM or PJM demonstrated a greater decrease in VAS scores at rest, during functional activities, and during the night compared to those in the electrotherapy group from baseline to after the treatment (p < 0.05). This improvement continued at the 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). The MWMs and PJM groups also showed significantly improved WOMAC and ALF scores, knee ROM and quadriceps muscle strength compared to those in the electrotherapy group from baseline to 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). In the treatment of patients with knee OA, manual physical therapy consisting of either MWM or PJM provided superior benefit over electrotherapy in terms of pain level, knee ROM, quadriceps muscle strength, and functional level.     

The efficacy of topical sesame oil in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blinded active-controlled non-inferiority clinical trial

ObjectiveSesame oil is an herbal product that has been used to treat the joints pain in several traditional medicines. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of topical sesame oil versus diclofenac gel in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsOne hundred and four patients were randomly enrolled in two arms of the trial. Patients were treated by topical sesame oil or diclofenac (three times a day) for 4 weeks. Outcome measures were knee pain via visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, knee joint’s flexion angle, 8-meter walk test and number of used analgesics. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 2 and then 4 weeks after the intervention.ResultsAt the follow-up visits, sesame oil was not inferior to diclofenac regarding scores of WOMAC pain, 8-meter walk test, and knee flexion angle. Although, its non-inferiority was not proved regarding scores of VAS, WOMAC stiffness, and WOMAC total at the 4^th week. Moreover, sesame oil was not inferior to diclofenac regarding consumed analgesics.ConclusionIt seems that the topical sesame oil was non-inferior to diclofenac gel on the reduction of the knee OA pain and improvement of some indicators of its function.     

Sex and body mass index correlate with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and quality of life scores in knee osteoarthritis

Elbaz A, Debbi EM, Segal G, Haim A, Halperin N, Agar G, Mor A, Debi R. Sex and body mass index correlate with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and quality of life scores in knee osteoarthritis.

Objective

To examine the associations of sex, body mass index (BMI), and age with knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptomatic severity.

Design

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis.

Setting

Patients completed the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Data were acquired from a stored database of a private therapy center.

Participants

Patients (N=1487) with symptomatic knee OA were evaluated.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

WOMAC questionnaire and SF-36.

Results

BMI correlated significantly with worse knee OA symptoms for all WOMAC and SF-36 subcategories (all P≤.001). Age correlated significantly with worse symptoms only for WOMAC function and SF-36 physical functioning (P=.001 and P=.009, respectively). A significant difference across BMI quintiles was found for all WOMAC and SF-36 subcategories (all P≤.01). Women showed worse knee OA symptoms in all WOMAC and SF-36 subcategories (all P≤.001). There was a significant interaction of sex by BMI in WOMAC pain and WOMAC function (P=.01 and P=.02, respectively).

Conclusions

Based on the results of this analysis, it can be concluded that women and patients with a higher BMI with knee OA are at a greater risk for worse symptoms.     

Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential currents, and shortwave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study

Atamaz FC, Durmaz B, Baydar M, Demircioglu OY, Iyiyapici A, Kuran B, Oncel S, Sendur OF. Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential currents, and shortwave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), interferential currents (IFCs), and shortwave diathermy (SWD) against each other and sham intervention with exercise training and education as a multimodal package.DesignA double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.SettingDepartments of physical medicine and rehabilitation in 4 centers.ParticipantsPatients (N=203) with knee osteoarthritis (OA).InterventionsThe patients were randomized by the principal center into the following 6 treatment groups: TENS sham, TENS, IFCs sham, IFCs, SWD sham, and SWD. All interventions were applied 5 times a week for 3 weeks. In addition, exercises and an education program were given. The exercises were carried out as part of a home-based training program after 3 weeks' supervised group exercise.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome was a visual analog scale (0–100mm) to assess knee pain. Other outcome measures were time to walk a distance of 15m, range of motion, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Nottingham Health Profile, and paracetamol intake (in grams).ResultsWe found a significant decrease in all assessment parameters (P<.05), without a significant difference among the groups except WOMAC stiffness score and range of motion. However, the intake of paracetamol was significantly lower in each treatment group when compared with the sham groups at 3 months (P<.05). Also, the patients in the IFCs group used a lower amount of paracetamol at 6 months (P<.05) in comparison with the IFCs sham group.ConclusionsAlthough all groups showed significant improvements, we can suggest that the use of physical therapy agents in knee OA provided additional benefits in improving pain because paracetamol intake was significantly higher in the patients who were treated with 3 sham interventions in addition to exercise and education.     

Exercise on balance and function for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives

To assess balance and function of symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and investigate the influence of physical exercise.

Changes in self-reported disability after performance-based tests in obese and non-obese individuals diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study are three-fold: (1) To examine whether the WOMAC questionnaire should be obtained before or after performance-based tests. (2) To assess whether self-reported disability scores before and after performance-based tests differ between obese and non-obese individuals. (3) To observe whether physical activity and BMI predict self-reported disability before and after performance based tests. Methods: A longitudinal study included thirty one participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using the Kellgren-Lawrence Scale by an orthopedic surgeon. Results: All WOMAC scores were significantly higher after as compared to before the completion of performance-based tests. This pattern of results suggested that the WOMAC questionnaire should be administered to individuals with OA after performance-based tests. The obese OA was significantly different compared to the non-obese OA group on all WOMAC scores. Physical activity and BMI explained a significant proportion of variance of self-reported disability. Conclusion: Obese individuals with knee OA may over-estimate their ability to perform physical activities, and may under-estimate their level of disability compared to non-obese individuals with knee OA. In addition, self-reported physical activity seems to be a strong indicator of disability in individuals with knee OA, particularly for individuals with a sedentary life style.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Osteoarthritis is a progressive joint disabling condition that restricts physical function and participation in daily activities, particularity in elderly individuals.

• Obesity is a comorbidity commonly associated with osteoarthritis and it appears to increase self-reported disability in those diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee.

• In a relatively small sample, this study recommends that rehabilitation professionals obtain self-report questionnaires of disability after performance-based tests in obese individuals with osteoarthritis of the knee as they are more likely to give an accurate representation of their level of ability at this time.

     

Hydrotherapy versus conventional land-based exercise for the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrotherapy in subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee compared with subjects with OA of the knee who performed land-based exercises. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects with OA of the knee were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups that performed exercises for 18 weeks: a water-based exercise group and a land-based exercise group. The outcome measures included a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain in the previous week, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), pain during gait assessed by a VAS at rest and immediately following a 50-foot (15.24-m) walk test (50FWT), walking time measured at fast and comfortable paces during the 50FWT, and the Lequesne Index. Measurements were recorded by a blinded investigator at baseline and at 9 and 18 weeks after initiating the intervention. RESULTS: The 2 groups were homogenous regarding all parameters at baseline. Reductions in pain and improvements in WOMAC and Lequesne index scores were similar between groups. Pain before and after the 50FWT decreased significantly over time in both groups. However, the water-based exercise group experienced a significantly greater decrease in pain than the land-based exercise group before and after the 50FWT at the week-18 follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Both water-based and land-based exercises reduced knee pain and increased knee function in participants with OA of the knee. Hydrotherapy was superior to land-based exercise in relieving pain before and after walking during the last follow-up. Water-based exercises are a suitable and effective alternative for the management of OA of the knee.     

Photobiomodulation does not provide incremental benefits to patients with knee osteoarthritis who receive a strengthening exercises program: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThere is lack of agreement in the literature about the effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) for reducing pain-related symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether PBM, when combined to exercises, provides incremental therapeutic benefits for pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with knee OA.MethodsA six-month double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted. Patients with knee OA were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Exercise, Exercise plus Active PBM, or Exercise plus Placebo PBM. Treatment was provided over an eight-week period, three times per week. The primary outcomes were pain at rest and upon movement, assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). WOMAC global score, QoL, and a core-set of performance-based tests were measured as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were collected at baseline, immediately after treatment, and after three- and six-month post-treatment.Results127 participants were allocated as follows: Exercise, N = 41; Exercise plus Active PBM, N = 44; and Exercise plus Placebo PBM, N = 42. There was no between-groups difference in improvement in pain, physical function, and QoL for all follow-up times. However, all groups presented significant, clinically relevant improvements in pain, physical function, and QoL immediately and three months after treatment compared with baseline measures.ConclusionPatients with knee OA who received a strengthening exercises program did not experience incremental benefits regarding pain, physical function, or QoL when adding PBM to their therapeutic exercises.     

AAOMPT platform presentations selection

Background

Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrate an increased falls’ risk, but it is not known how knee OA affects stumble response and subsequent recovery. In previous trials, an orthopaedic manual physical therapist (OMPT) approach resulted in meaningful improvements for reducing the pain, stiffness, and functional limitations associated with knee OA.

Purpose

Describe stumble recovery in patients with knee OA and observe the changes following OMPT intervention.

Methods

This was a prospective case series with age- and gender-matched controls. Five patients with symptomatic knee OA (57.2 [1.5 years]) and five matched controls (56.8 [3.2 years]) completed the alternate step test and walked on a treadmill with lateral to medial translational walking surface perturbations. Data were collected on strides to recovery and reaction times in response to perturbation. After completing the WOMAC, patients were treated using an OMPT approach for 4 weeks and re-tested.

Results

The patient group demonstrated meaningful clinical improvements in WOMAC scores (mean change 62%, 86.8 [40.6] to 32.6 [31.9]) and alternate step test performance (mean change 28%, 9.3 [2.0] to 6.8 [1.6] seconds) at 4 weeks. At baseline, two of the five patients differed appreciably from their matched controls in both strides to recovery and reaction time. After four weeks of treatment, both patients demonstrated significant improvements following intervention that aligned them more closely with their controls.

Discussion–conclusion

For those patients identified as being at high risk for falls, we observed large improvements in alternate step test performance and stumble recovery strategies following 4 weeks of OMPT intervention.

• J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Nov; 19(4): 239–246.
»
• Manual physical therapy management for a pediatric patient diagnosed with atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation with pre-/post-intervention MRI validation: a case report

J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Nov; 19(4): 239–246. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12998437860712

Manual physical therapy management for a pediatric patient diagnosed with atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation with pre-/post-intervention MRI validation: a case report

SM Baker and JA Rot

SM Baker

²1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX, USA¹Kids Can Do, Inc., Mokena, IL, USAFind articles by SM Baker

JA Rot

²University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, St. Augustine, FL, USAFind articles by JA RotAuthor information Copyright and License information Disclaimer¹Kids Can Do, Inc., Mokena, IL, USA²University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, St. Augustine, FL, USACorresponding author: ude.asu@torjCopyright © W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2011     

Exercise in knee osteoarthritis: do treatment outcomes relate to bone marrow lesions? A randomized trial

Purpose: Exercise is effective for reducing knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain but effect sizes vary widely. Moreover, not all knee OA patients perceive beneficial effects. Tailoring specific exercises to subgroups of knee OA patients may increase effectivity. Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) have been suggested as a criterion to define such subgroups.

This study aimed to investigate whether BMLs’ presence/absence is related to treatment outcomes in a group of knee OA patients who exercised for 18 weeks.

Methods: Subjects with symptomatic knee OA started a strength or walking exercise program. BMLs’ presence at baseline was assessed. Pain was assessed before and after the intervention with the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) questionnaire. Also the global perceived effect (GPE) on the patient’s complaints was rated.

Results: Thirty-five patients (strength (N?=?17) and walking (N?=?18)) were analyzed for BMLs. BMLs were present in 25 (71%) knees. Five (14%) patients dropped out and 19 (54%) improved (GPE ≥5). All dropouts had BMLs, but no difference was seen between dropouts and retainers (p?>?0.05). Pain scores did not differ between intervention groups (p?>?0.05) or between patients with BMLs and without BMLs (p?>?0.05).

Conclusions: Pain scores and GPE was not different between knee OA patients with and without baseline BMLs in this sample.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Both walking and strengthening exercises are effective means of improving pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

• In a relatively small sample, this study shows that the presence or absence of subchondral bone marrow lesions, as seen on magnetic resonance images, is not related to treatment outcomes.

     

Knee osteoarthritis: key treatments and implications for physical therapy

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic progressive disease that imparts a substantial socioeconomic burden to society and healthcare systems. The prevalence of knee OA has dramatically risen in recent decades due to consistent increases in life expectancy and obesity worldwide. Patient education, physical exercise, and weight loss (for overweight or obese individuals) constitute the first-line knee OA treatment approach. However, less than 40% of patients with knee OA receive this kind of intervention. There is an unmet need for healthcare professionals treating individuals with knee OA to understand the current recommended treatment strategies to provide effective rehabilitation.ObjectiveTo guide physical therapists in their clinical decision making by summarizing the safest and most efficacious treatment options currently available, and by delineating the most traditional outcome measures used in clinical research for knee OA.ConclusionThere is a need for healthcare providers to abandon low-quality and ineffective treatments and educate themselves and their patients about the current best evidence-based practices for knee OA.     

Variability in effect sizes of exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis depending on comparator interventions

BackgroundSystematic reviews of exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) have largely ignored the variability in comparator interventions.ObjectiveTo assess how effect estimates of exercise therapy for knee OA as reported in randomized controlled trials vary depending on the comparator interventions.MethodsWe followed the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidance to conduct and report this meta-epidemiological study. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from systematic reviews published in 2015 or later and reference lists of included studies. Exercise therapy RCTs testing interventions that adhered to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines compared to any comparator intervention in people with knee OA and reporting outcomes of knee pain, physical function and/or quadriceps strength at the end of intervention were included.ResultsThirty-five RCTs with 2412 participants were included. Comparator interventions included no intervention, non-ACSM compliant exercise therapy, education/self-management, and passive modalities. For pain, standardized mean difference (SMD) for ACSM compliant exercise therapy compared to passive modalities was 1.76 (95% CI 0.49, 3.04), no intervention 0.93 (95% CI 0.50; 1.36), education/self-management 0.27 (95% CI 0.07, 0.47), and non-ACSM compliant exercise therapy 0.09 (95% CI -0.06, 0.23). For physical function, SMD for ACSM compliant exercise therapy compared to passive modalities was 1.29 (95% CI 0.41, 2.17), no intervention 0.76 (95% CI 0.15, 1.36), non-ACSM compliant exercise therapy 0.25 (95% CI -0.00, 0.51) and education/self-management 0.21 (95% CI -0.14, 0.55). For quadriceps strength, SMD for ACSM compliant exercise therapy compared to no intervention was 0.69 (95% CI 0.42, 0.96), non-ACSM compliant exercise therapy 0.23 (95% CI -0.01, 0.46), education/self-management -0.02 (95% CI -0.45, 0.42) and passive modalities 0.80 (95% CI -0.10, 1.71).ConclusionThe effect of exercise therapy for knee OA varies significantly depending on the comparator intervention. This variability should be assessed routinely in systematic reviews.     

Iyengar yoga for treating symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knees: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES: The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis (OA) emphasize the use of nonpharmacologic interventions including exercise. Implementation of an exercise program can be difficult for patients, and little is known about the benefits of alternative therapies such as yoga. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of using yoga in the tradition of B.K.S. Iyengar to treat the symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. DESIGN: Participants were instructed in modified Iyengar yoga postures during 90-minute classes once weekly for 8 weeks. SUBJECTS: Participants met ACR criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee and completed a medical history and physical examination, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2 (AIMS2), Patient Global Assessment (GA) by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Physician GA by VAS, and 50-foot Walk Time before and following an 8-week course of yoga instruction. Eleven (11) subjects enrolled, nine completed at least one session and seven (six of whom were obese) had data from pre- and post-course time points available for analysis. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and AIMS2 Affect were observed when participants' status were compared to their pre-course status. WOMAC Stiffness, AIMS2 Symptoms, Social and Role, Physician GA, and Patient GA measured trends in improvement of symptoms. No adverse events from treatment were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that yoga may provide a feasible treatment option for previously yoga-naive, obese patients >50 years of age and offers potential reductions in pain and disability caused by knee OA. Future studies should compare yoga to other nonpharmacologic interventions for knee OA, such as patient education or quadriceps-strengthening exercises.     

Comorbidities in Patients With End-Stage Knee OA: Prevalence and Effect on Physical Function

ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of comorbidities and their effect on physical function, quality of life (QOL), and pain, in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA).DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingA rehabilitation facility at university hospital.ParticipantsPatients (N=577; 503 women and 74 men) diagnosed with end-stage knee OA between October 2013 and June 2018.InterventionNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresComorbidities were as follows: osteoporosis, presarcopenia, degenerative spine disease, diabetes, and hypertension. All patients completed the following performance-based physical function tests: stair-climbing test (SCT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait analysis. Self-reported physical function and pain were measured using Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and a visual analog scale (VAS), respectively, and self-reported QOL was measured using EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.ResultsUnivariate analyses revealed that patients with osteoporosis had significantly higher scores in SCT ascent, SCT descent, TUG, WOMAC pain tests, and lower scores in 6MWT, gait speed, and cadence tests than those without osteoporosis. Patients with presarcopenia recorded higher scores in SCT ascent, TUG, EQ-5D, and lower scores in 6MWT and gait speed tests than those without presarcopenia. Patients with degenerative spine disease showed higher scores in WOMAC pain and lower scores in gait speeds than those without degenerative spine disease. Patients with diabetes showed higher scores in SCT ascent than those without diabetes, and patients with hypertension showed lower scores in 6MWT than those without hypertension. After adjusting age, sex, and body mass index, SCT descent retained significant association with osteoporosis, SCT ascent showed independent association with presarcopenia and diabetes, and WOMAC pain revealed significant association with degenerative spine disease.ConclusionThe results confirm associations between comorbidities, performance-based and self-reported physical functions, and QOL in patients with end-stage knee OA.     

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current Combined with Exercise for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Interferential current (IFC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are forms of electrical stimulation frequently used to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). The relative effectiveness of these two modalities is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of IFC and TENS, when used in conjunction with exercise, on pain and function in patients with knee OA. Forty-six subjects with radiographically confirmed OA were randomly assigned to one of three groups: TENS and standardised exercises, IFC and exercises or exercises alone. An electrical stimulator was used to apply IFC or TENS at 80 Hz for 20 minutes. All groups had a standardised exercise programme. Treatment was applied twice per week for 4 weeks. Outcomes included a 10-point pain rating scale for pain intensity and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA performed on the pain assessment score showed a statistically significant effect of time (p < 0.001), but not of experimental group (p = 0.813) or interaction (p = 0.067). A similar result was obtained for WOMAC score (p < 0.001, p = 0.241 and p = 0.130 for time, group and interaction effects, respectively). All treatment protocols led to significant improvements in pain and function over time. Neither IFC nor TENS displayed significant additional effects over exercise alone.     

Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Manual therapy and exercise have not previously been compared with a home exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between a home-based physical therapy program and a clinically based physical therapy program. SUBJECTS: One hundred thirty-four subjects with OA of the knee were randomly assigned to a clinic treatment group (n=66; 61% female, 39% male; mean age [+/-SD]=64+/-10 years) or a home exercise group (n=68, 71% female, 29% male; mean age [+/-SD]=62+/-9 years). METHODS: Subjects in the clinic treatment group received supervised exercise, individualized manual therapy, and a home exercise program over a 4-week period. Subjects in the home exercise group received the same home exercise program initially, reinforced at a clinic visit 2 weeks later. Measured outcomes were the distance walked in 6 minutes and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: Both groups showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in 6-minute walk distances and WOMAC scores at 4 weeks; improvements were still evident in both groups at 8 weeks. By 4 weeks, WOMAC scores had improved by 52% in the clinic treatment group and by 26% in the home exercise group. Average 6-minute walk distances had improved about 10% in both groups. At 1 year, both groups were substantially and about equally improved over baseline measurements. Subjects in the clinic treatment group were less likely to be taking medications for their arthritis and were more satisfied with the overall outcome of their rehabilitative treatment compared with subjects in the home exercise group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although both groups improved by 1 month, subjects in the clinic treatment group achieved about twice as much improvement in WOMAC scores than subjects who performed similar unsupervised exercises at home. Equivalent maintenance of improvements at 1 year was presumably due to both groups continuing the identical home exercise program. The results indicate that a home exercise program for patients with OA of the knee provides important benefit. Adding a small number of additional clinical visits for the application of manual therapy and supervised exercise adds greater symptomatic relief.     

Effectiveness of translational manipulation under interscalene block for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A nonrandomized clinical trial

Study Design: Nonrandomized controlled trial. Objective: To determine whether translational manipulation under anesthesia/local block (TMUA) adds to the benefit of mobilization and range of motion exercise for improving pain and functional status among patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (AC). Background: TMUA has been shown to improve pain and dysfunction in patients with AC. This intervention has not been directly compared to physical therapy treatment without TMUA in a prospective trial. Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of AC were divided into two groups. Patients in the first (TMUA) group received a session of translational manipulation under interscalene block, followed by six sessions of manipulation and exercise. Patients in the comparison group received seven sessions of manipulation and exercise. Outcome measures taken at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months and 4 years included Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores. Four-year outcomes included percent of normal ratings, medication use, and activity limitations. Results: Both groups showed improved SPADI scores across all follow-up times compared to baseline. The TMUA group showed a greater improvement in SPADI scores than the comparison group at 3 weeks, with no significant differences in SPADI scores at other time points. However, at 4 years, significantly more subjects in the comparison group (5 of 8) had activity limitations versus subjects in the TMUA group (1 of 8). No subject experienced a complication from either intervention protocol. Conclusion: Physical therapy consisting of manual therapy and exercise provides benefit for patients with AC. Translational manipulation under local block may be a useful adjunct to manual therapy and exercise for patients with AC.     

No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial

BackgroundA stratified approach to exercise therapy may yield superior clinical and economic outcomes, given the large heterogeneity of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness during a 12-month follow-up of a model of stratified exercise therapy compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA, from a societal and healthcare perspective.MethodsAn economic evaluation was conducted alongside a cluster-randomized controlled trial in patients with knee OA (n = 335), comparing subgroup-specific exercise therapy for a ‘high muscle strength subgroup’, ‘low muscle strength subgroup’, and ‘obesity subgroup’ supplemented by a dietary intervention for the ‘obesity subgroup’ (experimental group), with usual (‘non-stratified’) exercise therapy (control group). Clinical outcomes included quality-adjusted life years – QALYs (EuroQol-5D-5 L), knee pain (Numerical Rating Scale) and physical functioning (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in daily living). Costs were measured by self-reported questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Data were analyzed through linear regression. Bootstrapping techniques were applied to estimate statistical uncertainty.ResultsDuring 12-month follow-up, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. The total societal costs of the experimental group were on average lower compared to the control group (mean [95% confidence interval]: € 405 [-1728, 918]), albeit with a high level of uncertainty. We found a negligible difference in QALYs between groups (mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.006 [-0.011, 0.023]). The probability of stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy from the societal perspective was around 73%, regardless of the willingness-to-pay threshold. However, this probability decreased substantially to 50% (willingness-to-pay threshold of €20.000/QALY) when using the healthcare perspective. Similar results were found for knee pain and physical functioning.ConclusionsWe found no clear evidence that stratified exercise therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA. However, results should be interpreted with caution as the study power was lower than intended, due to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.     

Bromelain as an adjunctive treatment for moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is the most prevalent joint disorder. Previous studies suggest that bromelain, a pineapple extract, may be a safer alternative/adjunctive treatment for knee OA than current conventional treatment. AIM: To assess the efficacy of bromelain in treating OA of the knee. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Subjects (n = 47) with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe knee OA were randomized to 12 weeks of bromelain 800 mg/day or placebo, with a 4-week follow-up. Knee (pain, stiffness and function) and quality-of-life symptoms were reported monthly in the WOMAC and SF36 questionnaires, respectively. Adverse events were also recorded. The primary outcome measure was the change in total WOMAC score from baseline to the end of treatment at week 12. Longitudinal models were used to evaluate outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients completed the trial (14 bromelain, 17 placebo). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for the primary outcome (coefficient 11.16, p = 0.27, 95%CI -8.86 to 31.18), nor the WOMAC subscales or SF36. Both treatment groups showed clinically relevant improvement in the WOMAC disability subscale only. Adverse events were generally mild in nature. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that bromelain is not efficacious as an adjunctive treatment of moderate to severe OA, but its limitations support the need for a follow-up study.