XPG mRNA Expression Levels Modulate Prognosis in Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Conjunction with BRCA1 and ERCC1 Expression

BackgroundMolecular markers can help identify patients with early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high risk of relapse. Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), Xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), and breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) are involved in DNA damage repair, whereas ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) is implicated in DNA synthesis. Expression levels of these molecules might therefore have a prognostic role in lung cancer.Patients and MethodsWe examined ERCC1, RRM1, XPG, and BRCA1 mRNA levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 54 patients with stage IB-IIB resected NSCLC. A strong correlation was observed between the 4 genes.ResultsFor patients with low BRCA1, regardless of XPG mRNA expression levels, disease-free survival (DFS) was not reached. For patients with intermediate/high BRCA1 and high XPG, DFS was 50.7 months. However, for patients with intermediate/high BRCA1 and low/intermediate XPG, DFS decreased to 16.3 months (P = .002). Similar differences were observed in overall survival, with median survival not reached for patients with low BRCA1, regardless of XPG levels, or for patients with intermediate/high BRCA1 and high XPG. Conversely, for patients with intermediate/high BRCA1 levels and low/intermediate XPG levels, median survival dropped to 25.5 months (P = .007).ConclusionBRCA1 and XPG were identified as independent prognostic factors for both median survival and DFS. High BRCA1 mRNA expression confers poor prognosis in early NSCLC, and the combination of high BRCA1 and low XPG expression still further increases the risk of shorter survival. These findings can help optimize the customization of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Combined analysis of mRNA expression of ERCC1, BAG-1, BRCA1, RRM1 and TUBB3 to predict prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic value of excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), BCL2-associated athanogene (BAG-1), the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received platinum- based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Messenger RNA expressions of these genes were examined in 85 tumor tissues and 34 adjacent tissue samples using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The expressions of these five genes were analyzed in relation to chemotherapy and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Seventy-four patients were enrolled into chemotherapy.

Results

Patients with ERCC1 or BAG-1 negative expression had a significantly longer PFS (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001) than those with positive expression. Patients with negative ERCC1 and BAG-1 expression benefited more from platinum regimen (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002). Patients with BRCA1 negative expression might have a longer OS (P = 0.052), but not PFS (P = 0.088) than those with BRCA1 positive expression. A significant relationship was observed between the mRNA expression of ERCC1 and BAG-1 (P = 0.042). In multivariate analysis, ERCC1 and BAG-1 were significantly favorable factors for PFS (P = 0.018 and P = 0.017) and OS (P = 0.027 and P = 0.022).

Conclusions

ERCC1 and BAG-1 are determinants of survival after surgical treatment of NSCLC, and its mRNA expression in tumor tissues could be used to predict the prognosis of NSCLC treated by platinum.     

ERCC1, RRM1 and BRCA1 mRNA expression levels and clinical outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

This study was to investigate whether the expressions of DNA repair genes ERCC1 (excision repair cross complementing 1), RRM1 (ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1) and BRCA1 (breast cancer 1) affected clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC. Patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC were given platinum-based chemotherapy. Messenger RNA expression levels of ERCC1, BRCA1 and RRM1 were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction with TaqMan probes in the tumor. The relationship between these three genes with chemoresponse and overall survival was analyzed in this study. Eighty-five patients (median age 59, range 30–78) were enrolled into the study. Median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range 10.8–15.2). Time to progression (TTP) was 6.1 months (range 5.5–6.7). Patients with low ERCC1 expression benefited more from a platinum-containing regimen (P = 0.094). Patients with low RRM1 expression benefited more from a gemcitabine-containing regimen. Patients with high BRCA1 expression benefited more from an anti-tubulin-containing regimen (P = 0.046). Partial response rate was 42.4%. A statistically significant difference in OS was seen in patients with low ERCC1 levels compared to patients with high ERCC1 ones. (16.5 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.045). A significant relationship was observed between the expression of ERCC1 and BRCA1 and TTP (6.5 vs. 5.1 months, P = 0.001, 5.2 vs. 6.5, P = 0.019, respectively). High expression of BRCA1 was associated with better survival in the anti-tubulin-containing regimen subgroup (8.7 vs. 13.0, P = 0.035). ERCC1, RRM1 and BRCA1 are promising predictive and prognostic biomarkers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.     

Effect of BRCA1 and XPG mutations on treatment response to trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: exploratory analysis of the phase 3 OVA-301 study

In this exploratory analysis, patients with recurrent ovarian cancer carrying BRCA1^mut gene had improved outcomes with trabectedin + PLD treatment compared with PLD alone. Prospective evaluation of BRCA status is likely an important evaluation for DNA-damaging agents and may significantly impact interpretation of clinical studies. XPG may be a biomarker of poor outcome in these patients.BackgroundWe investigated the association of BRCA1 and XPG mutations with response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a subset of patients from a phase 3 clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of trabectedin + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus PLD alone in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.Patients and methodsA candidate array was designed based on the Breast Cancer Information Core database for BRCA mutation analyses. An exploratory analysis of BRCA1/XPG mutation status was conducted using a two-sided log-rank test and 0.05 significance in germline DNA samples from 264 women with failed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, randomized (1 : 1) to trabectedin + PLD or PLD alone.ResultsOverall, 41 (16%) of the 264 women had BRCA1^mut (trabectedin + PLD: n = 24/135, 18%; PLD: n = 17/129; 13%) and 17 (6%) had XPG^mut (trabectedin + PLD: n = 8/135, 6%; PLD: n = 9/129, 7%). A higher RR was observed in BRCA1^mut patients (20/41; 49%) versus BRCA1^wt patients (62/223; 28%). Within the BRCA1^mut group, trabectedin + PLD-treated patients had longer PFS and longer OS than PLD-treated patients (median PFS 13.5 versus 5.5 months, P = 0.0002; median OS 23.8 versus 12.5 months, P = 0.0086), whereas in BRCA1^wt patients, OS was not significantly different (median OS: 19.1 versus 19.3 months; P = 0.9377). There were no differences in OS or PFS of patients with XPG^mut between the two treatment arms. However, trabectedin + PLD-treated patients with XPG^mut had a trend toward shorter PFS (median PFS: 1.9 versus 7.5 months; P = 0.1666) and OS (median OS: 14.5 versus 20.7 months; P = 0.1774) than those with XPG^wt.ConclusionsIn this exploratory analysis, patients with recurrent ovarian cancer carrying the BRCA1^mut had improved outcomes with trabectedin + PLD treatment compared with PLD alone. Prospective evaluation of BRCA status is likely an important evaluation for DNA-damaging agents and may significantly impact interpretation of clinical studies. XPG may be a biomarker of poor outcome in these patients.     

ERCC1、RRM1和BRCA1在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及预后意义

目的:探讨DNA修复基因家族成员ERCC1、RRM1和BRCA1在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的表达及预后意义。方法:应用实时荧光定量PCR技术对32例肺癌及16例癌旁组织中ERCC1、RRM1和BRCA1基因的mRNA进行定量检测。用非参数检验、相关分析、Kap lan-M e ier生存曲线和COX多因素回归分析进行统计分析。结果:NSCLC中ERCC1、RRM1和BRCA1在癌组织内表达量显著高于癌旁组织,且在癌内表达具有正相关性;RRM1在肺鳞癌中高于腺癌,但在不同分期中表达无差异;ERCC1和BRCA1在不同病理类型和分期中表达均无差异;RRM1和BRCA1高表达组的生存期明显长于低表达组;COX多因素回归分析示RRM1表达是影响本组患者预后的独立因素。结论:NSCLC中,ERCC1、RRM1和BRCA1在肺癌组织中的表达显著高于癌旁组织,RRM1和BRCA1高表达组的生存期长于低表达组。RRM1和BRCA1可作为判断预后的一种指标。     

A biomarker profile for predicting efficacy of cisplatin–vinorelbine therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Purpose

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a dismal prognosis. Treatment results may be improved by biomarker-directed therapy. We investigated the baseline expression and impact on outcome of predictive biomarkers ERCC1, BRCA1, and class III β-tubulin in a cohort of MPM patients treated with cisplatin–vinorelbine. We further explored the possibility of combining markers into a treatment-response profile to increase the predictive power.

Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 54 MPM patients included in a phase II trial were evaluated for ERCC1, BRCA1, and class III β-tubulin by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Immunostaining was quantified by an H-score and dichotomized according to upper quartile values. The ERCC1- and class III β-tubulin-status classified patients as treatment resistant (ERCC1 positive?+?class III β-tubulin positive) or treatment responsive (ERCC1 negative?+?class III β-tubulin negative). The remaining marker combinations were considered inconclusive.

Results

Fifty patients had tumor tissue available for IHC. Eleven had a responsive profile, and nine had a resistant profile. Thirty patients had an inconclusive profile. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7?months in the treatment-resistant group, 15.3?months in the treatment-responsive group, and 8.1?months in the inconclusive group (log-rank p?=?0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment-resistant patients had a decreased PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with the treatment-responsive patients (HR 6.45, CI 95?% [2.02–20.64] p?=?0.002 and HR 4.64, CI 95?% [1.56–13.79], p?=?0.006, respectively). BRCA1 status was associated with neither PFS nor OS.

Conclusion

Combined negative ERCC1 and class III β-tubulin immunostaining is associated with significantly prolonged PFS and OS in MPM patients receiving cisplatin–vinorelbine therapy.     

ERCC1 assessment in upfront treatment with and without cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Prior studies have demonstrated an association between excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression level and outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ERCC1 on survival for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial, thus receiving as treatment either erlotinib/bevacizumab (EB) or cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (PGB). We retrospectively analyzed tumor tissue of 72 patients using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of ERCC1. The distribution between treatment arms was equal (36 patients each). Two different H scores were calculated and correlated with survival. In ERCC1-positive patients, no significant difference in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms has been detected. ERCC1-negative patients benefited from PGB compared to EB arm (H score: HR?=?0.377, 95% CI [0.167–0.849], p?=?0.0151; modified H score: HR?=?0.484, 95% CI [0.234–1.004], p?=?0.0468). With respect to the scoring system, in the EB-arm, a significant superior PFS turned out in ERCC1-positive patients when employing the H-score (HR?=?0.430, 95% CI [0.188–0.981], p?=?0.0397; median 4.9 vs. 3.9 months), but not with the modified H-score. Our findings support the hypothesis that NS-NSCLC displaying a low ERCC1 expression might benefit from cisplatin-based chemotherapy. High expression indicated better PFS in the EB arm supporting the prognostic impact. However, as impact of ERCC1-assessment even might depend on scoring systems differences, the need in standardization of assessment methodology is emphasized.     

Preliminary indication of survival benefit from ERCC1 and RRM1-tailored chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: evidence from an individual patient analysis

BACKGROUND:

Excision repair cross complementing 1 (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) are molecular determinants that predict sensitivity or resistance to platinum agents and gemcitabine, respectively. Tailored therapy using these molecular determinants suggested patient benefit in a previously reported phase 2 trial. Here, we report an individual patient analysis of prospectively accrued patients who were treated with the “personalized therapy” approach versus other “standard,” noncustomized approaches.

METHODS:

Patients who had nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with extranodal metastatic disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 were accrued to 4 phase 2 clinical trials conducted at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center: Trial A (first‐line carboplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel), Trial B (docetaxel and gefitinib in patients aged ≥70 years), Trial C (combination therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel/atrasentan), and Trial D (personalized therapy based on ERCC1 and RRM1 expression). Patients with low RRM1/low ERCC1 expression received gemcitabine/carboplatin, patients with low RRM1/high ERCC1 expression received gemcitabine/docetaxel, patients with high RRM1/low ERCC1 expression received docetaxel/carboplatin, and patients with high RRM1/high ERCC1 expression received vinorelbine/docetaxel. Patients who were treated on Trials A, B, and C were pooled together and analyzed as the “standard therapy” group. Patients accrued to Trial D were called the “personalized therapy” group. Individual patient data were updated as of February 8, 2011. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier method.

RESULTS:

There were statistically significant improvements between the personalized therapy group versus the standard therapy group in response (44% vs 22%; P = .002), OS (median: 13.3 months vs 8.9 months; P = .016), and PFS (median: 7.0 months vs 4.3 months; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS:

The results from individual patient analyses suggest that ERCC1 and RRM1/tailored selection of first‐line therapy improved survival over standard treatment‐selection approaches. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Predictive value of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line platinum–paclitaxel chemotherapy

Purpose

Drug resistance is not only one of the major obstacles to treatment but also a poor prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 in advanced NSCLC patients who received platinum–paclitaxel treatment.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-six advanced NSCLC patients, who were treated with first-line platinum–paclitaxel chemotherapy, were enrolled in this study. The protein expression levels of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 were assessed by immunohistochemistry and analyzed for the association with response to chemotherapy and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Patients with negative expression of APE1, ERCC1 or TUBB3 benefited from platinum plus paclitaxel regimen chemotherapy. ERCC1-negative patients had better PFS (P = 0.016) and OS (P = 0.030) compared with positive patients. Similarly, the APE1-negative patients showed better PFS (P = 0.004) and longer OS though statistically insignificant. Multivariate analysis showed that APE1 and ERCC1 were independent predictor for PFS (HR 2.07; P = 0.004 and HR 1.66; P = 0.016) and OS (HR 1.99; P = 0.008 and HR 1.64; P = 0.040). Moreover, patients with both APE1- and ERCC1-negative or both APE1- and TUBB3-negative tumors had significantly higher response rate, longer median PFS and OS following treatment with platinum and paclitaxel (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The data indicate that APE1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 could be a useful biomarker to predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line platinum–paclitaxel chemotherapy.     

ERCC5/XPG, ERCC1, and BRCA1 gene status and clinical benefit of trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to determine whether specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathways are associated with sensitivity to trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS:

The authors analyzed excision repair cross‐complementation group 5/xeroderma pigmentosum group G (ERCC5/XPG) (NER), excision repair cross‐complementation group 1 (ERCC1) (NER), and breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) (HR) SNPs and messenger RNA expression levels in tumor specimens from 113 patients with advanced STS who were enrolled in previously published phase 2 trials or in a compassionate‐use program. The 6‐month progression‐free rate (PFR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to ERCC5, ERCC1, and BRCA1 status using log‐rank tests.

RESULTS:

High expression of the common allele (aspartic acid at codon 1104) of ERCC5, high expression of ERCC1, and BRCA1 haplotype were associated significantly with improved PFR, PFS, and OS. The ERCC1 thymine‐to‐cytosine (T→C) SNP at codon 19007 and BRCA1 expression were not associated with outcome. On univariate analysis, tumor histology, favorable NER status (high expression of common ERCC5 and/or high ERCC1 expression status), and favorable BRCA1 haplotype (at least 1 triple‐adenine plus guanine [AAAG] allele) were the sole variables associated significantly with PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the current study, ERCC5, ERCC1, and BRCA1 status represented a potential DNA repair signature that could be used for the prediction of clinical response to trabectedin in patients with STS. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Transforming growth factor-β1 and α-smooth muscle actin in stromal fibroblasts are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with clinical stage I–IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer after curative resection

The aims of this study were to investigate the expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in surgical resection specimens from nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate the prognostic significance of this gene expression in stromal fibroblasts for patients with clinical stage I–IIIA NSCLC. The immunohistochemical expression of TGF-β1 and α-SMA was evaluated in 78 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from clinical stage I–IIIA NSCLC. Correlations between this gene expression and the clinicopathologic characteristics were determined by chi-square test. The prognostic impact of this gene expression in stromal fibroblasts with regard to overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard proportional model. The percentages of high TGF-β1 expression in stromal fibroblasts and cancer cells were 19.2 % (15/78) and 35.9 % (28/78), respectively. There were 28.2 % (22/78) of patients with high α-SMA expression in stromal fibroblasts. The analysis revealed a significant positive association between TGF-β1 expression in stromal fibroblasts and in cancer cells (χ ²?=?4.86, p?=?0.03). No significant association was found between TGF-β1 in cancer cells and α-SMA expression in stromal fibroblasts (χ ²?=?0.978, p?=?0.326). The 3-year OS rates with low and high TGF-β1 expression in stromal fibroblasts were 52.4 and 26.7 %, respectively (χ ²?=?5.42, p?=?0.019). The 3-year OS rates with low and high α-SMA expression in stromal fibroblasts were 53.9 and 31.0 %, respectively (χ ²?=?5.01, p?=?0.025). The multivariate analysis revealed that clinical stage and TGF-β1 and α-SMA expression levels in stromal fibroblasts were identified as independent predictive factors of OS. The results suggest that the expression level of TGF-β1 and α-SMA in stromal fibroblasts may have prognostic significance in patients with clinical stage I–IIIA NSCLC after curative resection.     

mRNA Expression and Clinical Significance of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1, TYMS and TUBB3 in Postoperative Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: To explore mRNA expression and clinical significance of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1, TYMS andTUBB3 genes in tumor tissue of postoperative patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materialsand Methods: Sixty NSCLC patients undergoing radical operation in our hospital from Nov., 2011 to Jun.,2012 were selected. Plasmid standards of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1, TYMS and TUBB3 were established andstandard curves were prepared by SYBR fluorescent real-time quantitative PCR analysis. Samples fromtumor centers were taken to detect mRNA expression of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1, TYMS and TUBB3 genesin cancerous tissue during operation. The total mRNA expression quantities were compared according todifferent clinical characteristics. Results: The total expression quantities of 5 genotypes from high to low wereERCC1>RRM1>TUBB3>TYMS>BRCA1 in turn. By pairwise comparisons, other differences showed statisticalsignificance (p<0.05 or p<0.01) except for TYMS and TUBB3 (p>0.05); the low expression rates from high to lowwere ERCC1>TYMS>TUBB3>TUBB3>RRM1>BRCA1 in turn. The expression quantities of BRCA1, RRM1 andTYMS in males, smokers and patients without adenocarcinoma were all significantly higher than that in females,non-smokers and patients with adenocarcinoma, and significant differences were present (p<0.05 or p<0.01).In terms of pathological staging, the expression quantities of BRCA1, RRM1 and TYMS in phases Ⅱa~Ⅱb andⅢa~Ⅲb had a tendency to be greater than in phases Ⅰ and Ⅳ. Conclusions: Resistance to chemotherapy andsensitivity to targeted therapy differ among patients with NSCLC. Differences in gene expression in differentindividuals were also revealed. Only according to personalized detection results can individualized therapeuticregimens be worked out, which is a new direction for oncotherapy.     

Tubulin, BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas, RAP80 mRNA expression, p53/p21 immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of tumor expression of nine genes on clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Methods

Quantitative PCR or immunohistochemistry were used to analyze the expression of β-tubuline IIA (TUBB2A), β-tubuline III (TUBB3), BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas (ABRX) and RAP80 in mRNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies of 45 NSCLC patients treated as part of a larger observational trial. All patients received first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy for stage IIIB or IV NSCLC.

Results

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, overall survival (OS) 12 months. A partial treatment response was found in 14 patients (33%). Patients with low ERCC1 or ABRX expression had a significantly better response to chemotherapy (R = −0.45, p < 0.01 for ERCC1; R = −0.40, p = 0.016 for ABRX). A significant correlation was found between the individual time for PFS and the expression of both ERCC1 (R = −0.36, p = 0.015) and ABRX (R = −0.46, p = 0.001). Patients with low ERCC1 expression had a longer OS as compared to patients with high ERCC1 expression (HR = 0.26, log-rank p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The study confirms tumor expression of ERCC1 as a predictor for clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and found ABRX expression to be similarly predictive of clinical outcome. Prospective validation is warranted and - if confirmed - non platinum-containing chemotherapy should be explored as the preferred treatment in patients with high ERCC1 or ABRX expression and no activating mutations of EGFR.     

Prognostic value of <Emphasis Type="Italic">ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">SETDB1</Emphasis> in early stage of non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Nowadays, 40 % of early-stage NSCLC patients relapse in the 2 years following resection, suggesting a mis-staging in this group of patients who are not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Although different biomarkers, such as ERCC1, RRM1 and BRCA1 have been found to present prognostic value in advanced NSCLC patients, in early-stage NSCLC patients its relevance remains unclear. Moreover, SETDB1 has been recently proposed as a bona fide oncogene in lung tumourigenesis and related with metastasis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic value of ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression levels in NSCLC patients at stage I.

Patients and methods

ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression at mRNA level was analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in fresh-frozen tumor and normal adjacent lung tissue samples from 64 stage I NSCLC patients. Later, significant association between gene expression levels, clinicopathological characteristics and patient’s disease-free survival was assessed.

Results

We did not find any statistically significant correlation between gene expression and gender, age, histological type or smoking status. Univariate followed by multivariate Cox analysis showed that higher levels of BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival in stage I NSCLC patients.

Conclusion

Our study finds that ERCC1 and RRM1 are not independent prognostic factors of recurrence in stage I NSCLC patients. By contrast, BRCA1 and SETDB1 stand out as the most significant prognostic markers in this group of patients, appearing as promising tools to predict tumor recurrence in early-stage NSCLC patients.

     

Individualized chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients based on mRNA levels of BRCA1 and RRM1

Objective: Experimental evidence suggests that the overexpression of breast cancer-specific tumor suppressor protein 1 (BRCA1) gene enhances sensitivity to docetaxel and resistance to cisplatin and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) gene overexpression enhances resistance to gemcitabine. To further examine the effect of BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels on outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed this non-randomized phase II clinical trial which tested the hypothesis that customized therapy would confer improved outcome over non-customized therapy. Methods: RNA was isolated from fresh tumor tissue. Patients received chemotherapy regimen based on their BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels: both low-cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP); both high-vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP); BRCA1 low and RRM1 high-cisplatin plus docetaxel (TP); BRCA1 high and RRM1 low-vinorelbine plus gemcitabine (GN). Results: From Dec 2005 to Nov 2008, 94 metastatic and locally advanced NSCLC patients from our institute were enrolled in this study. The median age was 58 years old. Among them, 21 patients received GP, 30 patients received TP and 43 patients received NP chemotherapy. GP group had a higher response rate, and longer median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) time than the other 2 groups. The response rates in the GP, TP and NP groups were 42.9%, 36.7% and 27.9%, respectively (P=0.568). The median TTP was 5.6, 5.0, 4.8 months (P=0.975), respectively, and the median OS time was 12.5, 11.0, 9.7 months (P=0.808), respectively. Conclusion: Chemotherapy customized according to BRCA1 and RRM1 expression levels is associated with higher response rate and longer TTP and OS time in the GP group. This suggests that BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels could be used as biomarkers in individual therapy in NSCLC.     

Different relation between ERCC1 overexpression and treatment outcomes of two platinum agents in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma patients

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression on treatment outcomes in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

One hundred and six patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of biliary tract were enrolled at 5 institutions in South Korea between January 2002 and September 2008. Of 106 patients, 93 were assessed by immunohistochemistry from tissue specimens. Sixty-five patients were treated with cisplatin-based regimens and the other 28 treated with oxaliplatin-based ones.

Results

For total study population, no significant differences were noted in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between ERCC1-negative and ERCC1-positive patients, respectively (4.2 vs. 2.9?months, p?=?0.116; 7.0 vs. 7.8?months, p?=?0.143). In patients treated with cisplatin-based regimens, median PFS and OS were significantly longer in ERCC1-negative group than in ERCC1-positive group, respectively (4.6 vs. 1.9?months, p?=?0.014; 9.1 vs. 7.9?months, p?=?0.017). Disease control rate (DCR) was better in patients with ERCC1 negative than in patients with ERCC1 positive (p?=?0.048). On the other hand, in patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens, median PFS and OS tended to be longer in ERCC1-positive group, but these did not reach statistical significances. Response rate was better in patients with ERCC1 positive (p?=?0.005).

Conclusions

ERCC1 shows a significant prognostic value in ABTA patients treated with cisplatin. A survival benefit was observed in ERCC1-negative patients from cisplatin-containing chemotherapy but not from oxaliplatin-containing ones. The action mechanism of ERCC1 on cisplatin may be different from that on oxaliplatin.     

Excision repair cross‐complementing gene‐1, ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1, ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2, and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter‐1 expression and prognostic value in biliary tract malignancy

BACKGROUND:

Tumor expression of excision cross‐complementing gene‐1 (ERCC1), human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1), and ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2 (RRM2), is associated with the efficacy of platinum and gemcitabine chemotherapy. The authors of this report recently demonstrated that high ERCC1 and RRM2 expression levels are independent negative prognostic markers for survival in early stage pancreas cancer. The differential expression and prognostic value of these biomarkers in biliary tract malignancy (BTM) is unknown.

METHODS:

In total, 63 patients who had tissue available for analysis were selected from a prospective database of all patients (n = 104) who underwent resection of BTM (intrahepatic, hilar, or distal cholangiocarcinoma; gallbladder carcinoma) between January 2000 and December 2008. Immunohistochemistry for ERCC1, hENT1, RRM1, and RRM2 expression was performed. Staining was scored by a single pathologist who was blinded to patient outcomes.

RESULTS:

The median patient age was 67 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.2 months, and the median follow‐up was 32.7 months. Only 3 BTMs (4.8%) had high ERCC1 expression, and 92.1% and 81% of BTMs exhibited high hENT1 and RRM1 expression, respectively. RRM2 expression varied, and 32% of tumors demonstrated high RRM2 expression. ERCC1 and RRM1 were not associated with OS. High RRM2 expression was associated with a trend toward improved OS (30.8 months vs 16.2 months; P = .06), and high hENT1 expression was associated with improved OS (17.7 months vs 9.5 months; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most BTMs exhibited low ERCC1 expression and high hENT1 and RRM1 expression, whereas RRM2 expression levels varied. High expression of hENT1 was associated with improved OS. These findings may have implications for the selection of chemotherapy agents (gemcitabine vs platinum) and the stratification of patients in chemotherapy trials that assess outcome. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Positive expression of ERCC1 predicts a poorer platinum-based treatment outcome in Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The goal of this study is to determine role of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) expression in predicting response and survival in Chinese patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy tissues were retrospectively obtained from 124 advanced NSCLC patients. Protein expression levels of ERCC1 and RRM1 were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Associations between expression of ERCC1 and RRM1 and clinic-pathologic parameters were analyzed. The study shows that ERCC1 and RRM1 expression was detected in 43 (35%) and 50 (40%) of the 124 tumor samples, respectively. Expression of ERCC1 and RRM1 was negatively associated with tumor response. Fifty-four percent patients whose tumors did not express ERCC1 had partial response (PR) compared to 33% whose tumors expressed the protein (P = 0.022). Similarly, 54% patients whose tumor did not express RRM1 had PR compared to 36% whose tumors expression the protein (P = 0.042). Further, patients whose tumors lacked of ERCC1 but not RRM1 expression had a longer median survival time than those tumors expressed ERCC1 (13.4 months versus 9.1 months; P = 0.006), which is independent of other prognostic factors (P = 0.0066). In conclusion, tumor ERCC1 expression is associated with tumor response and patients’ survival in Chinese advanced NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based regimen and may serve as a biomarker in predicting tumor response and clinical outcome in the patient population.     

Excision-repair-cross-complement-1 protein as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy

Excision-repair-cross-complement-1 (ERCC1) protein expression in tumor cells has been associated with resistance to platinum compounds, the backbone of treatment in NSCLC. In the current study the impact of the tumoral ERCC1 protein expression on the outcome of patients with advanced stage NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, was investigated. Ninety-four patients with inoperable stage III–IV NSCLC, treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment tumor samples were analyzed for ERCC1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry. Response to treatment, time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with patients’ clinicopathological characteristics and ERCC1 protein expression on tumor cells. ERCC1 protein low expression was detected in 39 (41.5%) patients and did not correlate with patients’ clinicopathological characteristics or response to chemotherapy. However, ERCC1 protein low expression showed a trend for better disease control rate (p = 0.059), longer TTP (5.3 vs. 3.2 months; p = 0.051) and significantly longer OS (18.7 vs. 9.7 months; p = 0.009). ERCC1 could have a role in refining prognosis and thus individualizing chemotherapy for advanced stage NSCLC.