The use of a free and pedicled lateral arm flap for coverage of an extensive degloving injury of the upper extremity

Classical skin free flaps are rarely used to cover large skin defects of the upper extremity because of the limited donor size. Muscle flaps with a skin graft are preferred because they provide a large amount of cover and a good blood supply. A case report is presented in which a double skin flap was used to cover a large defect (40×8 cm) extending from the lateral humeral condyle to the dorsal aspect of the hand. A free lateral arm flap from the contra–lateral arm was successfully used in conjunction with a pedicled reversed lateral arm flap from the injured limb. We suggest that skin flaps should be considered for cover of skin defects. The lateral arm flap, which is a versatile flap, offers thin, pliable and sensate skin with minimal donor site morbidity.     

Versatility of the lateral arm free flap in various anatomic defect reconstructions

The free lateral arm flap may be harvested as a fascial, fasciocutaneous, or osteofasciocutaneous flap. Simultaneous flap elevation with preparation of the recipient site, easy dissection, minimal donor-site morbidity, and a constant vascular anatomy with long pedicle are advantages of the flap. In this study, the authors present 18 patients operated on between January, 2002 and August, 2003 in whom 18 free lateral arm flaps were utilized. There were four women and 14 men, and the mean patient age was 40 years. Thirteen fasciocutaneous, three fascial, and two osteofasciocutaneous flaps were used. Flaps were employed for the reconstruction of the lower extremity in five patients, upper extremity in nine patients, and head and neck in four patients. Thirteen flaps were elevated under axillary block and five flaps under general anesthesia. Aspirin, dipirydamol, dextran, and chlorpromazine were administered postoperatively. Venous insufficiency developed in two lower-extremity reconstructions on postoperative day 1. Venous thromboses were detected, anastomoses were re-done, and flaps healed uneventfully. No other postoperative complication was observed in the other patients. The free lateral arm flap may be used in various anatomic defects with various indications. It may be elevated under axillary block for extremity reconstructions.     

Free flap choice for soft tissue reconstruction of the severely damaged upper extremity

Reconstruction of complex wounds of the hand associated with severe bone, tendon, nerve and soft-tissue injuries has been a major problem in hand surgery. Early definitive soft-tissue coverage of this kind of extensive wound with well-vascularized tissue is one of the most important stages of reconstruction for salvage of the extremity and restoration of function. Although multiple free flap donor sites have been described for complex upper extremity wounds, the authors think that anterolateral thigh (ALT) and lateral arm (LA) flaps are good choices for soft-tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity because of their reconstructive characteristics. These flaps can be used as flow-through and also sensate flaps. There is no need for position change intraoperatively and two teams may work simultaneously. Donor sites can be hidden and there is no required sacrifice of major artery or muscle.     

Microsurgical free flap transfer to amputation sites: indications and results

A series of microsurgical free flap reconstructions to amputation stumps of the upper as well as the lower extremities was reviewed in 7 male and 2 female patients. Indications included preservation of length after trauma in 6 patients and cure of local infection in 2 patients. In 1 patient an extensive defect after resection of a recurrent shoulder sarcoma required use of a complete arm fillet free flap for tumor reconstruction. Microvascular free flaps used included four scapular flaps, two fillet flaps from the amputated extremity, one anterolateral thigh flap, and one lateral arm flap. Seven of 9 patients were fitted with a prosthesis and underwent occupational therapy resulting in ambulatory and improved functional status. Microvascular reconstruction is indicated in emergency settings as well as for elective reconstruction of amputation sites. Using uninjured "spare parts" of the amputated extremity should be considered. Elective reconstruction is performed preferably with free flaps based on the subscapular vascular system.     

带感觉的上臂外侧皮瓣游离移植修复手部皮肤缺损

目的游离上臂外侧穿支感觉皮瓣修复手部皮肤缺损。方法2008年7月-2010年5月．急诊或择期行同侧上臂外侧穿支感觉皮瓣修复手部皮肤缺损11例．其中单纯皮肤缺损5例．合并肌腱伤或骨折6例。皮瓣切取面积为6．5cm×4．5cm-11cm×6．5cm,皮瓣包括上臂外侧皮神经．移至受区重建皮瓣感觉。结果术后皮瓣全部成活。随访5～12个月．皮瓣外观及弹性良好,单纯皮肤缺损行皮瓣移植后手部各关节主被动活动正常者5例,合并肌腱伤或骨折行皮瓣移植后手部各关节主动活动有不同程度影响者6例。按中华医学会手外科学会断指再植功能评定标准评定：优7指,良4指。结论带感觉上臂外侧皮瓣游离移植是修复手部皮肤缺损的一种较好方法。     

The free lateral arm flap in reconstructive hand surgery

Microsurgical tissue transplantation has provided a great advance in reconstructive surgery, especially regarding upper limb defects. Compared to conventional pedicled flaps, mobilisation can occur earlier, hospital stay is shorter and no additional interventions for pedicle detachment and flap inset are needed. The lateral arm flap is an exceptionally versatile free flap with straightforward dissection and low donor site morbidity. End-to-side anastomosis preserves blood flow through the main arteries to the hand and reduces the risk of vascular compromise of the hand, which is especially important in case of severe hand injuries. Sixteen patients who underwent hand reconstruction using the lateral arm free flap are reviewed. All arterial anastomoses were conducted in end-to-side-technique either to the radial or the ulnar artery. There was no total- or partial-flap failure and only one revisional procedure due to a haematoma under the anastomosis. Eight flaps required secondary defatting, combined with removal of osteosynthesis material or tenolysis. From our point of view the free lateral arm flap is a very reliable and versatile method to resurface small and medium sized hand defects.     

Leiomyosarcoma of the forearm: treatment with wide local excision and a lateral arm flap

Leiomyosarcomas of the subcutaneous tissues in the upper extremity are extremely rare tumors. We report a subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma of the forearm in a 52-year-old man who was treated with wide local excision and reconstruction with a free lateral arm flap.     

Vascularized femoral nerve graft with anterolateral thigh true perforator flap for massive defects after cancer ablation in the upper arm

Massive resection of soft-tissue sarcoma in the elbow region often results in loss of long segments of the brachial artery and median nerve, as well as a wide soft-tissue defect. With conventional nerve grafts and revascularization of the arm, forearm and hand function is poor because nerves cannot be regenerated over the long nerve gap in the high elbow region. The authors used a long vascularized nerve graft and found it effective for reconstruction of upper arm function. This paper describes the first application of a free vascularized femoral nerve graft and a free anterolateral thigh true perforator flap based on the lateral circumflex femoral system, to repair elbow and forearm function. Long vascularized femoral nerve grafts of over 12 cm can be obtained, and an anterolateral thigh flap can be harvested from the same donor area.     

Upper extremity reconstruction using free SCIA/SIEA flap

The most suitable free flap alternative in upper extremity reconstruction has adequate and quality of tissue with consistent vascular pedicle. Free flap must provide convenient tissue texture to reconstruct aesthetic and functional units of upper extremity. Furthermore, minimal donor site morbidity is preferred features in free flap election. In our efforts to obtain the best possible outcome for patients, we chose, as a first priority, the free superficial circumflex inferior artery (SCIA)/superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap over other free flap options for the soft‐tissue reconstruction of upper extremities. The authors retrospectively report the results of 20 free SCIA/SIEA flaps for upper extremity reconstruction during the past 3 years. Nineteen of 20 flaps were successful (95%): three required emergent postoperative reexploration of the anastomosis and one failed. Flap thinning (n = 4) was performed during the flap harvest, whereas some flaps were thinned with secondary debulking (n = 4). The functional and aesthetic results were evaluated as acceptable by all patients. Based on our results, a free SCIA/SIEA flap has the following advantages in soft‐tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity: (1) if necessary, flap thinning may be performed safely at the time of flap elevation and (2) flaps are harvested using a lower abdominal incision so that it causes minimal donor site scar. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010.     

Upper limb flaps for hand reconstruction

This article reviews three of the most popular upper limb flaps used in hand surgery, namely the posterior interosseous flap, the lateral arm flap and the radial forearm flap. An anatomic study performed with the use of eight fresh cadavers (sixteen upper limbs) is supported by a wide review of the literature. The combined posterior interosseous and lateral arm flap is also discussed. It is concluded that these flaps are easily harvested and dependable and in spite of any disadvantages their combination should be adequate for the treatment of almost any hand injury.     

The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma

BACKGROUND: Severe isolated upper extremity injuries are rarely lethal; however, they invariably are resource intensive, create significant disability, and promote resistance to a return to gainful employment. Appropriate soft tissue restoration is an essential component of any treatment protocol, and often requires a vascularized flap to protect the superficial neurovascular and musculotendinous structures. A basic schema to facilitate flap selection in the upper extremity is introduced. METHODS: The role of local muscle and fascia flaps or free tissue transfers for severe upper extremity injuries was retrospectively reviewed from a two-decade experience. Excluding digital injuries, primary treatment of soft tissue traumatic wounds requiring some form of vascularized flap occurred in 33 limbs in 31 patients. The choice of flap donor site, type, specific complications and benefits as related to the severity of injury, and the effect of timing of wound closure were compared. RESULTS: Initial coverage after significant upper extremity trauma in these 33 limbs required 16 local fascia flaps, 22 free flaps, 1 multistaged distant pedicled flap, and 1 local muscle flap. Flaps were selected in a nonrandom fashion on the basis of wound location, severity of injury, and flap availability. Complication rates were similar for local fascia and free flaps. The upper extremity could be divided into three regions that were differentiated according to the observed incidence of flap preference. Free flaps were more commonly used for hand and wrist wounds, or anywhere the defect was moderately large in size or extremely severe in overall injury. Local fascia flaps were a simpler option most applicable for the central upper limb. Local muscles as flaps were intentionally avoided to minimize any functional derangement. CONCLUSION: A schema to guide flap selection for upper extremity coverage is introduced that is predicated on using the best available option. The shoulder girdle and axilla are reached by many local trunk muscle or fascia flaps. The central upper limb about the elbow often is conducive to coverage with specific local fascia flaps. The distal upper extremity may be best served by a free flap, as would any large wound in all upper limb regions.     

New anterolateral thigh perforator flap with a short pedicle for reconstruction of defects in the upper extremities

Three cases of successful transfer of a new free anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the hand and upper arm are described. This new flap has a thin superficial fatty layer, no fascial component, and is vascularized with a perforator of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral system. The free flap is nourished by anastomosing of the perforator or the proximal small segment of the descending branch. The advantages of this flap are no need for deep dissection, minimal time for flap elevation, minimal donor site morbidity, preservation of the main trunk of the lateral circumflex femoral system, possible thinning of the flap with primary defatting, possible application as a flow-through flap, and a concealed donor scar. This flap is suitable for coverage of defects in the fingers, hands, and arms.     

Free fillet flap application to cover forequarter or traumatic amputation of an upper extremity: A case report

Reusing tissue of amputated or unsalvageable limbs to reconstruct soft tissue defects is one aspect of the “spare parts concept.” Using a free fillet flap in such situations enables the successful formation of a proximal stump with the length needed to cover a large defect from forequarter amputation without risking additional donor‐site morbidity. The use of free fillet flaps for reconstruction after forequarter and traumatic upper extremity amputations is illustrated here in a case report. A 41‐year old patient required a forequarter amputation to resect a desmoid tumor, resulting in an extensive soft‐tissue defect of the upper extremity. A free fillet flap of the amputated arm and an additional local epaulette flap were used to reconstruct the defect. At 9 months after the procedure, a satisfactory result with a very well healed flap was attained. Free fillet flaps can be used successfully for reconstruction of large upper extremity defects, without risking additional donor‐site morbidity. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:700–704, 2016.     

Sequential free tissue transfers for simultaneous upper and lower limb salvage

Background: The Iraq and Afghanistan Wars have presented military reconstructive surgeons with a high volume of challenging extremity injuries. In recent years, a number of upper and lower extremity injuries requiring multiple tissue transfers for multiple limb salvages in the same casualty have been encountered. Our group will discuss the microsurgical challenges, algorithms, and success and complication rates for this cohort of war injured patients. Methods: All consecutive limb salvage cases requiring free flaps from 2003 to 2012 were reviewed. Cases involving simultaneous free tissue transfers were identified. Data collected included success rates and complications with comparisons made between the single and multiple free‐flap limb salvage cohorts. Results: Seventy‐four free flap limb salvage cases were performed over the 10‐year period. Of these cases, four patients received two free flaps to separate upper and lower extremity injuries for limb salvage within a single operative setting. The complication rate was 63%, which was significantly higher than those cases in which a single microvascular anastomosis was performed (26%, p = 0.046). However, the higher complication rate did not increase the flap or limb salvage failure rates (p = 0.892 and 0.626). Conclusions: The last decade of war trauma has provided a high volume of extremity injuries requiring limb salvage procedures including casualties who underwent single and multiple free flap coverage procedures. Although multiple flap limb salvage procedures have a higher complication rate, they can be performed within the same patient without concern for increased failure rate in carefully selected and appropriately managed patients. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:447–453, 2013.     

Reconstruction of elbow region defects using radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP)-based propeller flaps

Perforator-based propeller flaps permit flap rotation up to 180°. This ability to transfer skin from one longitudinal axis to another has led to the increasing use of perforator-based propeller flaps in extremity reconstruction, especially lower-extremity reconstruction. However, the application of perforator-based propeller flaps to upper-extremity reconstruction is still limited. This article reports two cases of successful reconstruction of elbow region defects with radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP)-based propeller flaps. The elbow region has a variety of perforators available for perforator-based propeller flap reconstruction. Among them, the RCAP seems to be one of the most reliable options. This is because there are less anatomical variations of perforators' location on the lateral upper arm than on the medial upper arm. By using an RCAP perforator as a flap pedicle, the small-to-medium sized defects (<6?cm in diameter) around elbow regions can be closed primarily without skin grafts.     

Negative pressure wound therapy as a definitive treatment for upper extremity wound defects: A systematic review

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represents one of the many solutions for complex wounds of the upper extremity. The goal of this study was to investigate the most common indications for definitive treatment of wound defects in the upper extremity with NPWT and to report revision surgery outcomes after its use. A systematic review of the literature was performed. The following keywords and their combinations were used: “upper extremity,” “arm,” “forearm,” “wrist,” “hand,” “finger” AND “negative‐pressure wound therapy,” “VAC therapy,” “vacuum assisted closure.” A total of 45 articles were included, regrouping 404 cases of NPWT in the upper extremity. The forearm was involved in 53% of cases, followed by hand (36%), fingers (10%), and arm (1%). Seventeen different indications were cited, the most common of which were radial forearm flap reconstruction (23%), burn wounds (18%), and compartment syndromes (17%). Of the cases, 90% did not require any subsequent surgical procedure, as opposed to 6% considered partial failures requiring minor revisions and 4% total failures requiring major revisions. Closure of radial forearm flap donor site required the most revision procedures when treated with NPWT. NPWT can be used for several indications pertaining to the reconstruction of the upper extremity. Positive outcomes as a definitive treatment are demonstrated in this systematic review, which reaffirms NPWT as a potent tool for reconstructive endeavours.     

Free flap reconstruction in massive upper extremity burns

In massive burns, early excision and a free flap reconstruction is, in some cases, limb saving. From October 1979 to August 1993, eleven patients with massive burn injury in the upper extremity were treated using a free flap reconstruction. Eight cases were acute or subacute and three were late reconstructions. The following free flaps were used: rectus femoris microneurovascular musculocutaneous flap (2), latissimus dorsi flap (4), rectus abdominis flap (3), gluteal thigh flap (1), lateral arm flap (1), and serratus flap (1). The gluteal thigh flap was lost and it was later replaced by a rectus abdominis flap. In three cases successful reanastomosis was performed. Functional late reconstructions were performed in nine patients. In all eleven patients the limb was saved and functional recovery was satisfactory. We recommend that a free musculocutaneous or muscle flap is used, proximal to the wrist, if after careful excision of nonviable tissue, tendons, bone joint or major vessels are exposed. The rectus femoris musculocutaneous flap is a useful solution to restore extensor musculature of the forearm after extensive injury.     

Versatility of lateral arm flap for hand reconstruction—a clinical experience

Background

The lateral arm free flap (LAFF) has several advantages in hand reconstruction due to multiple factors. We aimed to show the versatility of LAFF in treating hand defects.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all LAAF for hand reconstruction carried out at our institutions between August 2006 and August 2012 was undertaken. Clinical records were reviewed with respect to patients’ age and gender, size and location of defect, type and size of flaps, and complications.

Results

Twenty-four hand defects were reconstructed using LAFF. These included 15 cutaneous flaps, 8 fascial flaps, and 1 osteocutaneous flap. All flaps survived well except for one case that developed arterial insufficiency and required anastomotic revision. Primary closure of the donor site was possible in all patients. No complications occurred during the healing procedure.

Conclusions

The free lateral arm flap is a versatile and reliable option for defect coverage at the hand for small- and medium-size defects. It can be raised as a cutaneous, fascial, or osteocutaneous flap. Several advantages favor the use of lateral arm flap in hand reconstruction. These include preservation of major arm blood vessels, its constant vascular anatomy, long pedicle, and low donor site morbidity.Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

     

The use of the lateral arm flap in upper limb surgery

Twenty patients who had had upper limb reconstruction using the lateral arm free microvascular flap are reviewed. The size of the flap, modifications to the flap, and complications were documented. There was one flap failure, and nine flaps required surgical thinning at a second procedure. This sole disadvantage was outweighed in clinical usage by the advantages and versatility of the lateral arm flap.     

Free flaps in the reconstruction of hand and distal forearm injuries.

We report a series of 32 free flap reconstructions following acute hand and forearm trauma. The series consists of two dorsalis pedis flaps, four scapular flaps and 26 lateral arm flaps. One flap became infected and failed completely, and a partial necrosis occurred in another flap. The transfers covered large skin defects, exposed tendons, tendon grafts, bone, bone grafts, joints, nerves and nerve grafts. The donor site morbidity was negligible. Our study shows that free microvascular flaps are a safe and convenient alternative to conventional flaps in hand surgery. The lateral arm flap seems very suitable for small and medium size defects.