Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) versus antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). BACKGROUND: There are no controlled data to support the therapeutic value of PFO closure with a device compared to medical treatment in patients with CS. METHODS: We performed a nonrandomized, prospective, patient preference case series comparing the recurrence rate in 92 patients with PFO and CS who were treated either with antiplatelet agents (44 patients) or underwent catheter closure (48 patients) using the Amplatzer PFO occluder (APFOO). All patients completed a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: PFO closure group. Immediate complete closure (CC) was observed in 44/48 (91%) patients. Four (9%) patients had a minimal residual shunt immediately after the procedure. One patient developed hemopericardium that was successfully managed by pericardiocentesis. No other complication was observed. Follow-up. PFO closure group. Contrast bubble study at 6-month follow-up confirmed CC in all 48 patients. No complications were observed. Antiplatelet therapy group. Three (6%) and 6 (13%) patients had a major and minor hemorrhagic event, respectively. The average incidence of embolic events/year was 0 and 14.75% for the PFO closure group and the antiplatelet therapy group, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure using the APFOO is a rational alternative to medical treatment in patients with CS. Larger randomized clinical trials are required to support the use of this device over the other PFO occluders and medical therapy.     

The role of device closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke

One of the most frequent causes of cardiac embolism in cryptogenic stroke is a paradoxical embolus, which originate from systemic venous source though an unidentified patent foramen ovale (PFO). PFO is a common finding in the general population with a prevalence of 25% to 30%. Transcatheter PFO device closure is known to be feasible and safety treatment for such patients. In recent years, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to address the superiority of PFO closure over medical therapy alone in the prevention of stroke recurrence in patients with PFO. In contrast to findings from early 3 RCTs, recent 4 RCTs could successfully show the benefits of PFO device closure compared with medical therapy, with less peri‐ and postprocedural complication. Based on these data, PFO device closure is recommended to carefully select cryptogenic stroke patients aged from 18 to 65 years, with a high probability of a causal role of the PFO in stroke events. However, it is still uncertain whether PFO closure is superior to oral anticoagulants therapy in these patients. Therefore, further prospective randomized trials are needed to address the efficacy of PFO device closure to oral anticoagulants therapy.     

Patent foramen ovale closure following cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: Long‐term follow‐up of 301 cases

Patent foramen ovale has been identified as a conduit for paradoxical embolism resulting in cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed to establish rates of death, recurrent stroke or TIA among patients undergoing PFO closure for stroke or TIA at our unit. A retrospective analysis of all PFO closure patients was performed between May 2004 and January 2013. Follow up was performed by mortality tracing using the Medical Research Information Service of the Office of National Statistics. With regard to stroke or TIA recurrence, written consent forms and questionnaires were mailed with follow up telephone calls. Medical notes and imaging records were consulted where adverse events were noted. 301 patients aged 48.6 ± 11.0 years, 54.4% male, with ≥1 thromboembolic neurovascular event had percutaneous PFO closure with one of eight devices, with successful implantation in 99% of cases. Follow‐up duration was 40.2 ± 26.2 months (range 1.3–105.3); complete in 301 patients for mortality (100%) and 283 patients (94.0%) for neurovascular events. Two patients died during follow‐up (respiratory failure n = 1; road traffic accident n = 1). Recurrent stroke (MRI or CT confirmed) was observed in five patients (0.5%; 0.55 per 100 person‐years) and TIA in 9 (1.1%; 0.98 per 100 person‐years). Atrial fibrillation requiring treatment was documented in 14 patients (1.7%). Percutaneous PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA is a safe treatment with a low incidence of procedural complications and recurrent neurovascular events. Registry data like these may help to demonstrate the utility of PFO closure in stroke. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Impaired endothelial function in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale is not affected by closure

Introduction

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke (CS) and migraine with aura (MA). Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease, but might also be involved in migraine pathophysiology. Short‐term worsening of migraine has been described after closure of PFO. We evaluated endothelial function in patients with CS and PFO, before and after closure of PFO, and in patients with migraine, whether changes in endothelial function was related to a change in migraine frequency.

Material and Methods

Patients with CS and PFO were included; 20 with planned closure of PFO and seven controls on medical treatment only. Endothelial function was assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPat^R) and biomarkers of endothelial activation. Patients were followed longitudinally at baseline, day 1, 1 month, and 6 months. A headache diary was used to assess migraine frequency.

Result

Mean age of the cohort was 45.4 years, and migraine prevalence was 50% whereof 84.6% had MA. Median EndoPat^R index (RHI) at baseline was 1.60 (IQR 1.41‐2.00). There was no change in RHI over time, either in closure patients (P = 0.66), nor in controls (P = 0.31), and there was no change in biomarkers of endothelial activation. Three migraine patients experienced worsening of migraine frequency directly after closure.

Discussion

Endothelial function did not change after closure of PFO. Although patients were lacking cardiovascular risk factors, a high proportion had impaired endothelial function. Whether ED can have predictive value, identifying PFO at higher risk for recurrent stroke warrants further investigations.

     

Clinical outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure for paradoxical emboli without echocardiographic guidance

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for presumed paradoxical emboli without echocardiographic guidance or balloon sizing and the clinical outcome after device closure. Closure of the PFO has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with presumed paradoxical emboli. At present, most centers perform device closure with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance and balloon sizing of the defect. Between May 1998 and April 2002, 92 consecutive patients underwent device closure for a PFO using fluoroscopic monitoring only. Procedural success and major complications were recorded. Follow‐up outcomes were recurrence rate and residual atrial shunting on transthoracic echocardiography. All patients (mean age, 45 ± 13 years; 52% male) had successful device deployment using either the CardioSeal (n = 78) and Amplatzer (n = 14) PFO occluders with no major complications. Mean procedure time and fluoroscopy time was 27 ± 13 and 6 ± 4 min, respectively. One patient had a residual shunt on echocardiography at 1 year. Cumulative event‐free survival for recurrence of paradoxical embolus at 1 year was 97.3% ± 1.8%. This study provides a basis for device closure of PFO becoming a safe, day‐case procedure, resulting in a low rate of residual shunting and recurrent thromboembolic events. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:519–525. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Updated meta-analysis of closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke

Background

Among patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure has remained controversial. We hypothesized that with the cumulative number of subjects in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there is now sufficient power to ascertain whether PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke improves the risk of stroke.

Anatomical predictors for suture-based closure of the patent foramen ovale: A multicenter experience

Background

NobleStitch EL is a novel suture-based technique used for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and an alternative to traditional double-disc devices without the need for antithrombotic therapy. However, successful closure rates are still unknown, and certain anatomies may be unfavorable for successful closure.

Aims

We assessed the efficacy of the NobleStitch EL and sought to identify patient-related anatomical features associated with successful suture-based closure.

Methods

We included 55 patients who underwent PFO closure with the NobleStitch EL in The Netherlands and Switzerland. Successful closure was defined as residual right-to-left shunt grade ≤1 with Valsalva maneuver at a cardiac ultrasound. Predefined possible anatomical determinants for effective closure included PFO length, atrial septal aneurysm, PFO entry- and exit diameter.

Results

Successful closure was achieved in 33 patients (60%). The PFO length was shorter in patients with successful closure compared to unsuccessful closure with a median length of 9.6 mm (IQR 8.0–15.0) versus 13.3 mm (IQR 11.4–18.6) on preprocedural ultrasound (p = 0.041) and 9.9 mm (IQR 8.0–13.1) versus 12.5 mm (IQR 9.7–15.4) on angiography (p = 0.049). Additionally, the PFO exit diameter and PFO volume were smaller in patients with successful closure than unsuccessful closure, with a mean diameter of 7.0 ± 3.1 mm versus 9.5 ± 3.8 mm (p = 0.015) and a median volume of 381 mm³ (IQR 286–894) versus 985 mm³ (IQR 572–1550) (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

In our study cohort, the successful PFO closure rate using NobleStitch EL was relatively low (60%). With this alternative procedure, patients with a small PFO driven by a short PFO tunnel length and small exit diameter seem to be eligible for successful suture-based closure.     

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism: intermediate-term risk of recurrent neurological events.

Closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with presumed paradoxical emboli. We report our preliminary intermediate results of patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure for paradoxical embolism using DAS-Angel Wings occluder or Amplatzer devices. Eighteen patients (8 male/10 female) underwent catheter closure of their PFOs at a median age of 42 years. The complete closure rate was 67% immediately after the procedure and 100% at a mean follow-up interval of 2.2 +/- 1.8 years. The mean fluoroscopy time and procedure time in the Amplatzer group were 8.5 +/- 3.2 min and 65 +/- 21 min, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those of DAS-Angel Wings group (18.9 +/- 4.7 min and 137 +/- 28 min, respectively). There were no recurrent embolic neurological events following device placement in this subset of patients. No complications were encountered either during or after the closure procedure. In conclusion, transcatheter closure of PFO seems to be an effective alternative therapy in the prevention of presumed paradoxical emboli. Further study is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from this intervention.     

Transthoracic echocardiography guidance during percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale

Background: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been increasingly performed for several indications; mostly due to cryptogenic stroke. In this study we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) guidance during percutaneous closure of PFO in using the Amplatzer and Occlutech Figulla PFO occluder devices. Methods: Between October 2005 and March 2011, 139 patients (74 male, mean age: 40.4 ± 10.3) underwent transcatheter PFO closure. In all patients transesophageal echocardiography performed subsequently to diagnose, assess the size and evaluate for suitability of the defect for percutaneous closure. During the procedure fluoroscopy and TTE were used for guidance. Results: Among 139 patients, Amplatzer PFO occluder was used in 74 patients and in 65 of them Occlutech Figulla device was selected for occlusion. The indications for PFO closure were ischemic stroke in 98 (70.5%), recurrent transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in 40 (28.7%), peripheral embolism in 1 (0.8%) of the patients. In all patients, percutaneous intervention was performed successfully under TTE guidance. There have been no neurologic (recurrent strokes or TIAs) and cardiovascular complications during the immediate and long‐term follow‐up period (2–67 months, median 29). There was significant difference between the mean fluoroscopic time from the beginning which is 8.6 ± 3.4 min in the former versus 3.4 ± 1.9 min in the latter (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of TTE guidance during percutaneous closure of PFO, which shortens the procedural time and obviates the need for general anesthesia or endotracheal intubation. (Echocardiography 2011;28:1074‐1080)     

Implantation of a second closure device in patients with residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism yields complete occlusion in > 90% of patients using contemporary closure devices. Patients with a residual shunt after percutaneous PFO closure have been found at increased risk for recurrent paradoxical events. Treatment options for such patients include medical treatment using antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulation, surgical device removal and patch closure, and percutaneous implantation of a second closure device. We report our experience with implantation of a second closure device in 10 patients with more than a minimal residual shunt < or = 6 months after percutaneous PFO closure. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar for the initial and repeat intervention (32 vs. 30 min and 5 vs. 6 min, respectively; P = NS). There were no procedural complications during implantation of the second closure device. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography 6 months after the second percutaneous intervention revealed complete PFO closure in nine (90%) patients. Therefore, implantation of a second closure device in patients with persistence of more than a residual shunt after percutaneous PFO closure appears safe and effective.     

Sustained long‐term benefit of patent foramen ovale closure on migraine

Objectives : This single‐center, observational, prospective study evaluated the impact of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure on migraine attacks over time. Background : PFO closure may reduce the frequency and severity of migraine headaches in patients with significant right‐to‐left shunts. Methods : Between May 2000 and September 2009, 305 consecutive patients (mean age, 43 ± 12 years; 54.5% women) with a prior embolic cerebrovascular event underwent PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO occluder for recurrence prevention. All patients had right‐to‐left shunts; the shunts were associated with migraine symptoms in 77 (25%), either alone (n = 64, 83%) or with aura (n = 13, 17%). Septal aneurysm was present in 15 (19.5%) migraine patients, and 43 (56%) had a previous transient brain ischemic attack. All migraine patients had a computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging, indicating a previous brain ischemic lesion. All 305 patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography with clinical follow‐up at 24 hr, at 3, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly. Results : An acute migraine attack occurred 24–48 hr after PFO closure in 28 (36.4%) of 77 patients. There was a significant reduction (>50%) in the number and intensity of attacks in 46 (60.5%) of 77 patients at the 3‐month follow‐up. At the 12‐month follow‐up, migraine had ceased in 23 (46%) patients, and 20 (40%) had a reduction in the migraine recurrence rate and disabling symptoms. These results were maintained at follow‐up (mean, 28 ± 27 months). There was overall improvement in migraine in 89% of the treated patients. Conclusions : Percutaneous PFO closure in migraineurs may provide beneficial mid‐term and long‐term results, with significant reduction in the intensity and frequency of headache symptoms. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

PFO closure vs. medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/objectives

This study aims to assess whether patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is superior to medical therapy in preventing recurrence of cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Methods

We searched PubMed for randomized trials which compared PFO closure with medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke/TIA using the items: “stroke or cerebrovascular accident or TIA” and “patent foramen ovale or paradoxical embolism” and “trial or study”.

Results

Among 650 potentially eligible articles, 3 were included including 2303 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between PFO-closure and medical therapy in ischemic stroke recurrence (1.91% vs. 2.94% respectively, OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.37–1.10), TIA (2.08% vs. 2.42% respectively, OR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.50–1.51) and death (0.60% vs. 0.86% respectively, OR: 0.71, 95%CI: 0.28–1.82). In subgroup analysis, there was significant reduction of ischemic strokes in the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder arm vs. medical therapy (1.4% vs. 3.04% respectively, OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.21–0.98, relative-risk-reduction: 53.2%, absolute-risk-reduction: 1.6%, number-needed-to-treat: 61.8) but not in the STARFlex device (2.7% vs. 2.8% with medical therapy, OR: 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45–2.11). Compared to medical therapy, the number of patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) was similar in the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder arm (0.72% vs. 1.28% respectively, OR: 1.81, 95%CI: 0.60–5.42) but higher in the STARFlex device (0.64% vs. 5.14% respectively, OR: 8.30, 95%CI: 2.47–27.84).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis does not support PFO closure for secondary prevention with unselected devices in cryptogenic stroke/TIA. In subgroup analysis, selected closure devices may be superior to medical therapy without increasing the risk of new-onset AF, however. This observation should be confirmed in further trials using inclusion criteria for patients with high likelihood of PFO-related stroke recurrence.     

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale

AIM: To review the safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in symptomatic patients without the use of general anaesthesia or echocardiographic guidance. METHOD: All patients accepted for percutaneous PFO closure by our service from August 2002 to August 2004 were included. Patient demographics and clinical information were obtained from clinical records and by telephone interview. Follow-up outcomes recorded were recurrence of systemic thromboembolism, residual shunt, and change in pattern of migraines. RESULTS: Forty consecutive adult patients, of whom 19 (48%) had an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), underwent PFO closure using the Amplatzer occluder device with fluoroscopic guidance alone. Their mean age was 45 +/- 10 years (range 23-63 years) and 24 (60%) were male. The indications for closure were ischaemic stroke (n = 26), transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (n = 8), both stroke and TIA (n = 2), refractory hypoxia (n = 2), platypnoea-orthodeoxia (n = 1) and severe migraine with seizures (n = 1). Twenty patients suffered a single neurological event and 16 suffered >1 event, including six with only radiographic evidence of >1 event. Mean procedure time was 17.7 +/- 9.6 min and fluoroscopy time was 6.7 +/- 7.3 min. Implanted device sizes were 18 mm (n = 1), 25 mm (n = 37) and 35 mm (n = 2). In 33 patients, the procedure was performed as a day-case. No complications were encountered. No further neurological events occurred in 39 patients at a mean follow-up time of 11 +/- 7 months (3-25 months) nor was a significant shunt detected in the 34 who underwent follow-up echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous closure of PFO with or without ASA, under local anaesthesia and without echocardiographic guidance, is a safe and effective procedure which can be performed as a day-case. This has now become our standard clinical practice.