Duodenal obstruction after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a case report

Gastrointestinal tract complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are well known. The reported frequency ranges from 6.6% to 21%. However, the incidence of duodenal obstruction following AAA has probably been underestimated. This report concerns a 78-year-old male who was admitted for elective repair of an infrarenal AAA. On the ninth postoperative day, the patient presented with large quantities of bile-stained vomitus despite passing flatus per rectum. Metoclopramide and ranitidine were given under the initial impression of paralytic ileus. However, the upper gastrointestinal obstruction persisted, and on day 12, computerized tomography (CT) revealed marked distension of the gastric tube and duodenum, down to the level of the third portion, with abrupt change of caliber at the point of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). SMA syndrome was diagnosed. After nasogastric tube aspiration, parenteral nutrition, and 11 days of conservative treatment, abdominal CT and upper gastrointestinal series showed no apparent duodenal obstruction. The patient was discharged on the 29th postoperative day; follow-up abdominal CT 4 months later was unremarkable.     

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enhances early postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal, multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to reduce surgical stress and enhance recovery in the postoperative period. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of ERAS protocol in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).MethodsA total of 50 consecutive patients with pancreatic/periampullary cancer who underwent PD between January 2016 to August 2017 were included in the study. As per the institute ERAS protocol, nasogastric tube (NGT) was removed on postoperative day (POD) 1 if output was less than 200 mL and oral sips were allowed; oral liquids were allowed on POD2; semisolid diet by POD3; abdominal drain was removed on POD 4 if output was less than 100 mL with no evidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF); normal diet was allowed on POD5. Discharge criteria on POD6 were afebrile, tolerating oral normal diet, pain free and no surgery related complications (defined as per the ISGPS definitions).ResultsNGT was removed on POD1 in 45 (90%) patients, abdominal drain removed by POD4 in 41 (82%) and 43 (86%) patients were discharged on POD6. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. Three (6%) patients had delayed gastric emptying (DGE). None had postoperative hemorrhage and POPF. Readmission rate was 8%. A significant relation was found between the length of hospital stay (LOS) with age (P < 0.05) and a marginal relation between LOS and postoperative albumin (P = 0.05).ConclusionsERAS protocol can be safely followed in the perioperative care of patients who undergo PD. Early removal of NGT and allowing oral diet restore bowel function early. ERAS decreases the LOS and postoperative complications.     

A Case of Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Bile Leakage from the Cystic Duct Treated by Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage without EST

Abstract: The patient was a 45 year old female with cholelithiasis who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Bile leakage was detected from the site of Penrose drain insertion immediately after the operation. As no improvement of bile leakage was subsequently observed, ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) was performed on the third postoperative day. Neither choledocholithiasis nor choledochal stricture was found and the diagnosis of bile leakage from the cystic duct stump was made. A 5Fr ENBD (endoscopic nasobiliary drainage)-tube without EST (endoscopic sphincterotomy) was inserted into the common bile duct, and bile leakage disappeared completely on the third day after insertion of the ENBD tube. Additional laparotomy, EST or biliary stenting was thereby avoided. Choledo-chography, via the ENBD-tube, showed no leakage of contrast material, the ENBD-tube was removed and the patient was discharged. ENBD should be considered as a method of treatment for management of bile leaks from the cystic duct stump.     

Implementation of an enhanced recovery programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods: Patients undergoing PD were managed according to an ERAS protocol. Outcome measures included postoperative mortality, morbidity, hospitalization and 30-day readmission rate. Key protocol targets were: nasogastric tube (NGT) removal [postoperative day (PoD) 1]; resumption of oral fluids (PoD 1); urinary catheter removal (PoD 3); high-dependency unit (HDU) discharge (PoD 3); tolerating diet (PoD 4); drain removal (PoD 5), and hospital discharge (PoD 6). Results: Data were collected for 50 patients (24 male; median age 67 years). Rates of mortality, morbidity and readmission were 4%, 46% and 4%, respectively. The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 10 days. The proportions of patients achieving key targets were: 78% for NGT removal; 82% for resumption of oral fluids; 48% for urinary catheter removal; 82% for HDU discharge; 86% for tolerating diet; 84% for meeting mobility targets, and 72% for drain removal. One patient was discharged by PoD 6, eight patients by PoD 7, 15 patients by PoD 8 and 26 patients (52%) by PoD 10. Discharge was delayed in 16 patients for social or transport-related reasons. Conclusions: The ERAS protocol was implemented safely. Achieving certain targets was challenging. Non-medical causes remain a significant factor in delayed discharge following PD.     

Biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy: Optimization of endoscopic treatment

AIM: To investigate the results of endoscopic treatment of postoperative biliary leakage occurring after urgent cholecystectomy with a long-term follow-up.METHODS: This is an observational database study conducted in a tertiary care center. All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography(ERC) for presumed postoperative biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy in the period between April 2008 and April 2013 were considered for this study. Patients with bile duct transection and biliary strictures were excluded. Biliary leakage was suspected in the case of bile appearance from either percutaneous drainage of abdominal collection or abdominal drain placed at the time of cholecystectomy. Procedural and main clinical characteristics of all consecutive patients with postoperative biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy, such as indication for cholecystectomy, etiology and type of leakage, ERC findings and post-ERC complications, were collected from our electronic database. All patients in whom the leakage was successfully treated endoscopically were followed-up after they were discharged from the hospital and the main clinical characteristics, laboratory data and common bile duct diameter were electronically recorded. RESULTS: During a five-year period, biliary leakage was recognized in 2.2% of patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy. The median time from cholecystectomy to ERC was 6 d(interquartile range, 4-11 d). Endoscopic interventions to manage biliary leakage included biliary stent insertion with or without biliary sphincterotomy. In 23(77%) patients after first endoscopic treatment bile flow through existing surgical drain ceased within 11 d following biliary therapeutic endoscopy(median, 4 d; interquartile range, 2-8 d). In those patients repeat ERC was not performed andthe biliary stent was removed on gastroscopy. In seven(23%) patients repeat ERC was done within one to fourth week after their first ERC, depending on the extent of the biliary leakage. In two of those patients common bile duct stone was recognized and removed. Three of those seven patients had more complicated clinical course and they were referred to surgery and were excluded from long-term follow-up. The median interval from endoscopic placement of biliary stent to demonstration of resolution of bile leakage for ERC treated patients was 32 d(interquartile range, 28-43 d). Among the patients included in the follow-up(median 30.5 mo, range 7-59 mo), four patients(14.8%) died of severe underlying comorbid illnesses.CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the great efficiency of the endoscopic therapy in the treatment of the patients with biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy.     

Reevaluation of routine gastrointestinal decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We reviewed postoperative courses of patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy to evaluate the need for routine postoperative gastrointestinal decompression. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred patients who underwent gastrectomy during 1998 and 1999 were enrolled in this study. A nasogastric tube was placed in all patients just after induction of the anesthesia. The patients were divided into two groups, 150 patients for each. In group 1, the nasogastric tube was maintained until the passage of flatus per rectum. In group 2, the nasogastric tube was removed immediately after the operation. RESULTS: The return of bowel function, return to a diet and postoperative length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. In group 1, only one patient (0.7%) had abdominal distension and no patient vomited, while four patients (2.7%) had abdominal distension and one patient (0.7%) vomited in group 2. There were no significant differences in the incidence of respiratory complications, anastomotic leakage and wound complications between the two groups. Postoperative death was rare, with the incidence of 0.7% in each group. There was a significantly high incidence of patient's discomfort in group 1. The major complaint was sore throat and it caused sleep disturbance when severe. CONCLUSIONS: It is desirable to insert a nasogastric tube while the patient is in the anesthetized state and keep it during operation and remove it immediately after operation, when no active bleeding is detected.     

Relevance of day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing nation.

Feasibility, safety and success of day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has been well established in advanced countries. The information on (DCLC) is not available from developing nations. All patients of gallstone disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the care of the two participating surgeons at the post graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research were considered for day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The selection criteria were: elective cases only, patients less than 70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and Grade II, living within 20 Kilometers of the hospital, availability of a responsible adult carer at home, access to a telephone and a means of transportation to hospital if needed. Clinical and operative data were recorded prospectively. All patients were discharged 6 to 8 hours after surgery with the advice to contact the surgical team over phone whenever necessary or on the day after discharge. Out of the total 236 laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed over a period of 26 months, 106 patients (44.9%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day care procedure. Five patients (4.8%) were admitted after surgery. Four patients were admitted because of conversion and one patient was admitted because of suspected myocardial infarction. Hundred and one patients (95.2%) were discharged on the same day. There was no major morbidity and patient's acceptance was high. Day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible, safe, and acceptable to patients.     

A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain

We advocate a technique using a small silastic flexible drain for air leaks after pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing lung resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study. The 331 patients consisted of 227 men and 104 women, with a median age of 58 years. The surgical procedures were lobectomy in 145, wedge resection in 177, and segmentectomy in 9. At the end of the operation, a 19F silastic drain under a pressure of -7 cm H(2)O was inserted. When no air leak was observed, we removed the drain on postoperative day 1. When an air leak was observed, the suction mode was changed to a water seal. The mean duration of chest tube drainage was 1.9 days. The chest tube was removed on postoperative day 1 in 243 (73.4%) patients. Postoperative complications, other than prolonged air leak, occurred in 5 (1.5%) patients. The drain was not effective in 4 (1.2%) patients, and it was replaced with a conventional rigid drain. Management of air leaks using silastic flexible drains is safe and effective after wedge resection. Care should be taken in cases of lobectomy and segmentectomy when a large air leak is anticipated.     

Practical experience of a no abdominal drainage policy in patients undergoing liver resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Routine use of abdominal drainage after liver resection is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the practical application of a "no abdominal drainage" policy for consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection. METHODOLOGY: The present trial included 60 consecutive patients who underwent elective hepatic resection. Fifty-two patients underwent no abdominal drainage, and in the remaining eight drainage was necessary because of gross contamination of the surgical field associated with bilioenteric anastomosis, uncontrollable bile leakage from the cut surface of the liver, or the surgeon's preference. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no hospital death. Eight complications occurred in 8 patients in the no-drainage group (morbidity rate 15.4%, 8/52): bleeding, abscess, ascites requiring peritoneal tap, pleural effusion requiring thoracentesis, and pneumonia in one case each, and three cases of wound infection. Three complications were encountered in 2 patients in the drainage group (morbidity rate 25%, 2/8): bleeding, infected biloma and pleural effusion in one case each. Postoperative hospital stay tended to be shorter in the no-drainage group (10.7 +/- 3.9 days) than in the drainage group (15.6 +/- 6.4 days) (p = 0.07). Considering early uneventful removal of the drain on the morning of postoperative day 1, half of the drained patients might have not required drainage. Furthermore, in the setting of concomitant bilioenteric anastomosis (n=4), one patient underwent hepatectomy uneventfully without drainage, and two of three patients with drainage had their drains removed successfully on day 1. The third patient retained the drain for an unnecessarily long period, but did not develop subsequent complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the view that prophylactic abdominal drainage is unnecessary in most patients who undergo elective hepatic resection. Bilioenteric anastomosis may not be a contraindication for a no abdominal drainage policy.     

Gastric volvulus and wandering spleen

Although rare in childhood, gastric volvulus and wandering spleen share a common etiology: congenital absence of intraperitoneal visceral attachments. We report an unusual case of a patient who presented with three episodes of intractable vomiting and abdominal mass but no abdominal pain. A diagnosis could not be made until the third episode because the gastric volvulus resolved each time on placement of a nasogastric (NG) tube before any further tests could be done. During the third episode, diagnostic imaging was performed before inserting an NG tube, and the diagnosis of a mesenteroaxial gastric volvulus and an abnormally positioned spleen was made. Although both conditions are caused by abnormalities of fixation, the association of gastric volvulus and wandering spleen has been reported only once before.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial report.

Sixty consecutive patients underwent an elective attempt at laparoscopic cholecystectomy between March 15 and July 31, 1990 at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Fifty-two patients had successful completion of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (87%). The reasons for conversion to open cholecystectomy were acute cholecystitis (four patients), inability to define the cystic duct-common duct junction (three patients), and one patient with an unexpected choledochal cyst variant. Forty patients (77%) were discharged on the first post-operative day, and the remaining 12 patients on the second post-operative day. Thirty-three patients (63%) required only oral pain medication, and 11 patients (21%) needed no pain medication post-operatively. Fifty-one patients (98%) had resumed normal activities by the seventh post-operative day. Cholecystectomy remains the treatment of choice for biliary colic. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimizes length of stay in the hospital, lessens post-operative pain, allows quicker return to normal activities, and has a superior cosmetic result.     

Peptic ulcer perforation: management of high-risk cases by percutaneous abdominal drainage

Sixty-six patients were selected as high-risk cases of duodenal ulcer perforation. After resuscitation with intravenous fluids and nasogastric suction, a widebore percutaneous intra-abdominal drain was put in under local anaesthesia.There were three (4.5%) deaths; 58 (87.8%) patients improved satisfactorily. High-risk peptic ulcer perforation patients can be managed by putting in an intra-abdominal drain supported by conservative treatment.     

A swallowing study, based on clinico-pathological evaluation, performed by video-fluoroscopy

A clinico-pathological evaluation was performed on patients requiring nasogastric nutritional support. As a result, it was found that nasogastric tube feeding was common in patients with cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) and senile dementia of Alzheimer's type (SDAT). Pneumonia was anamnestic in many CVD patients, which was frequently the direct indication for nasogastric tube feeding and the major cause of death in these patients. On the other hand, pneumonia was not common in SDAT in which the major indication of nasogastric tube feeding was abnormal appetite. However, pneumonia was an infrequent cause of death in SDAT compared to CVD patients. The mean age in which nasogastric tube feeding was started was 8 years older in SDAT than CVD patients, however, there was no significant difference in the duration of nasogastric tube feeding ranging from initiation to death. A swallowing study, based on a clinico-pathological evaluation, was performed by video-fluoroscopy on healthy seniors and senior patients neurological diseases. There was no abnormal finding in the healthy seniors. Findings in CVD patients with single-sided neurological diseases indicated that 27.3% had moderate abnormalities and 18.2% had severe abnormalities. In CVD with bilateral defects, 35.7% had moderate abnormalities and 42.9% had severe abnormalities. Though even single-sided CVD defects can frequently cause swallowing disorder, oral food intake was maintained in nearly half of the patients with bilateral CVD, despite high incidence of severe swallowing disorder. In the mild SDAT group, rated on a scale from 0.5 to 1.0 according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), 11.1% had moderate swallowing disorder. In the CDR 2-3 group, 23.1% had moderate disability and 15.4% had severe disability. It appears that SDAT patients do not suffer from rapid deterioration in swallowing ability, which was relatively retained in this disease group. In Parkinson's disease patients with a Yahr grade of I-II, 55.6% had normal findings and 44.4% had mild abnormalities. In Yahr grade III-IV patients, 28.6% had mild and 28.6% had severe disability. Patients with severe dysfunction had a high incidence of silent aspiration. The swallowing function was maintained in the early course of mild Parkinson's disease patients, however the ability rapidly deteriorated with the course of the disease. The radiological findings of the swallowing study supported the clinico-pathological characteristics of each disease.     

A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction

AIM:To study the therapeutic efficacy of a new transnasal ileus tube advanced endoscopically for adhesive small bowel obstruction.METHODS:A total of 186 patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction treated from September 2007 to February 2011 were enrolled into this prospective randomized controlled study.The endoscopically advanced new ileus tube was used for gastrointestinal decompression in 96 patients and ordinary nasogastric tube(NGT) was used in 90 patients.The therapeutic efficacy was compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Compared with the NGT group,the ileus tube group experienced significantly shorter time for relief of clinical symptoms and improvement in the findings of abdominal radiograph(4.1 ± 2.3 d vs 8.5 ± 5.0 d) and laboratory tests(P 0.01).The overall effectiveness rate was up to 89.6% in the ileus tube group and 46.7% in the NGT group(P 0.01).And 10.4% of the patients in the ileus tube group and 53.3% of the NGT group underwent surgery.For recurrent adhesive bowel obstruction,ileus tube was also significantly more effective than NGT(95.8% vs 31.6%).In the ileus tube group,the drainage output on the first day and the length of hospital stay were significantly different depending on the treatment success or failure(P 0.05).The abdominal radiographic improvement was correlated with whether or not the patient underwent surgery.CONCLUSION:Ileus tube can be used for adhesive small bowel obstruction.Endoscopic placement of the ileus tube is convenient and worthy to be promoted despite the potential risks.     

Routine nasogastric suction may be unnecessary after a pancreatic resection

BackgroundMost surgeons routinely place a nasogastric tube at the time of a pancreatic resection. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the outcome when a pancreatic resection is performed without routine post-operative nasogastric suction.MethodsOne hundred consecutive patients underwent a pancreatic resection (64 a pancreaticoduodenectomy, 98% pylorus sparing and 36 a distal pancreatectomy). In the first cohort (50 patients), a nasogastric tube was routinely placed at the time of surgery and in the second cohort (50 patients) the nasogastric was removed in the operating room. Outcomes for these two cohorts were recorded in a prospective database and compared using the χ² or Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test.ResultsDemographical, surgical and pathological details were similar between the two cohorts. A post-operative complication occurred in 22 (44%) in each group (P= 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency or severity of complications, or length of stay between groups. The spectrum of complications experienced by the two cohorts was similar including complications that could potentially be related to the use of nasogastric suction such as delayed gastric emptying, anastomotic leak, wound dehiscence and pneumonia. There was no difference between the two groups in the number of patients who required post-operative nasogastric tube placement (or replacement) [2 (4%) vs. 4 (8%), P= 0.678].ConclusionIt may be safe to place a nasogastric tube post-operatively in a minority of patients after a pancreatic resection and spare the majority the discomfort associated with routine post-operative nasogastric suction.     

Recovery following treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease. A comparison between endovascular repair and open surgery.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative course in patients treated by endovascular repair (endo) with patients treated by open surgery (open) for descending thoracic aortic disease. METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated with stent grafting for aneurysmal disease or type B dissection were compared with 35 historical controls treated by open surgery. Stay in the intensive care unit, need for artificial ventilation and to where the patient had been discharged, were noted. Pain medication, use of nasogastric tube, time until total oral nutrition, mobilization and the patients' mental condition in the postoperative period, were studied in the patients charts and the nursing reports. RESULTS: Time on the intensive care unit or intermediate care unit was median 45 h in the endo group compared with 192 h in the open group. Eighty percent of the patients in the endo group were discharged directly to their homes in contrast to 23% after open surgery. In the endo group 67% of the patients started oral nutrition on the 1st postoperative day compared to 10% in the open group. There was a significantly faster mobilization in the endo group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significantly shorter recovery after stent grafting for descending thoracic aortic disease compared to patients operated with open surgical technique.     

Non-surgical management of microperforation induced by EMR of the stomach

BACKGROUND: Perforation and bleeding are major complications associated with gastric endoscopic mucosal resection. Evident perforation during endoscopic mucosal resection can be managed by endoscopic clipping. However, management of microperforation is not well established. PATIENT AND METHOD: From January 2002 to June 2004, 109 early gastric cancers and 300 adenomas were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection. Iatrogenic perforations occurred in 4.16% (n=17) patients. Following exclusion of four evident perforations, microperforation was observed in 3.18% (n=13) patients. The clinical features of microperforation in patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In a total of 13 microperforation cases, 2 patients were managed surgically. The remaining patients successfully recovered without surgical management. In the case of 11 patients without surgery, 7 experienced abdominal pain, which required analgesics, 2 patients experienced mild discomfort and 2 patients experienced no symptoms. A body temperature above 37.5 degrees C was observed in 9.1% (n=1) patients and leucocytosis above 9000 microL-1 was in 72.7% (n=8) patients. The mean duration of nasogastric tube drainage was 2.36+/-1.03 days, of fasting 4.18+/-1.17 days, of intravenous antibiotics 5.55+/-1.44 days and of hospitalisation 7.45+/-1.04 days. CONCLUSION: Microperforation induced by gastric endoscopic mucosal resection can be managed successfully using a non-surgical approach including fasting, nasogastric tube drainage and intravenous antibiotics.     

Gallstones, cholecystectomy, and duodenogastric reflux of bile acid

It has earlier been suggested that cholecystectomy, by eliminating the reservoir function of the gallbladder, will induce reflux of bile to the stomach. In the present study 23 patients were studied for duodenogastric reflux of bile acid before and 3 months after cholecystectomy. At the test the gastric contents were continuously aspirated via a nasogastric tube, collected at 15-min intervals for 2 h in the fasting patient, and analyzed for volume and bile acid concentration. The results were compared with those in 14 control subjects. Significant duodenogastric reflux of bile acid (greater than 100 mumol/h) was seen more frequently in gallstone patients than in controls. This is explained by a high prevalence of bile acid reflux in patients with a reduced or absent opacification of the gallbladder at cholecystography. Cholecystectomy increased the prevalence of bile acid reflux in the patients with well-opacified gallbladders at cholecystography. The duodenogastric reflux of bile acid in patients with a poor filling of the gallbladder at cholecystography was not further enhanced by cholecystectomy. It is concluded that gallstone patients have an increased tendency to duodenogastric reflux of bile acid. This tendency is further enhanced by removal of a functioning gallbladder. The findings may explain some of the symptoms in patients with gallstones. The reflux may also be responsible for symptoms in the so-called postcholecystectomy syndrome.     

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for treating bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile leaks are common complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We evaluated the diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of bile leaks. METHODOLOGY: A total of 436 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with infrahepatic drainage. We performed immediate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on all patients with bile discharge from an infrahepatic drain, and treated bile leaks which were not due to a major ductal injury by endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) without endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). RESULTS: Ten patients developed bile leaks which were recognized within 18 hours of operation. ERCP, on post-operative day 1 or 2, showed a bile leak from the cystic duct (9 patients) or the liver bed (1 patient). All patients underwent ENBD. Only 1 patient, who had a retained stone, had ES. In all patients, the bile leak resolved promptly and both the infrahepatic and nasobiliary drains were removed within 6 days of cholecystectomy. All patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Routine placement of an infrahepatic drain is recommended for the early detection of bile leaks. Bile leaks can be successfully treated by prompt ENBD without ES.     

Respiratory patterns after cholecystectomy. Effects of posture and CO2 stimulation

A marked reduction in the ratio of abdominal to rib cage motion has been observed after upper abdominal surgery. This study seeks to determine the effects on respiratory pattern of stimulation with CO2 and a change in posture from supine to semirecumbent posture (hips flexed, head of bed elevated at 30 degrees to the horizontal) in patients having undergone cholecystectomy. Canopy spirometry and respiratory inductive plethysmography were used to measure minute ventilation, tidal volume, and rib cage and abdominal motion in 14 otherwise healthy women, prior to elective cholecystectomy and on the first and third postoperative days. Preoperatively, the relative contribution of the chest wall compartment to tidal volume (Vc/VT) was increased both by moving from the supine to the semirecumbent posture and by stimulation with 4 percent inhaled CO2. On the first postoperative day, there was a reduction in abdominal motion. In contrast to what happened in the preoperative period, there was no change in the relative contribution of the rib cage and abdomen when the patients moved from the supine to semirecumbent position. With CO2 stimulation, there was a further increase in the already increased absolute tidal volume of the chest. On the third postoperative day, there was an increase in abdominal motion in the supine and sitting position and during 4 percent CO2 stimulation. These results demonstrate that the response to a change in posture and to 4 percent CO2 stimulation are markedly altered in the postoperative period by the reduction in abdominal motion.