国人肝段在冠状断层上的划分

目的：为肝内微小病变精确定位诊断和外科治疗提供冠状断层解剖学依据。方法：采用30例上腹部连续冠状断层标本、20例肝内门静脉和肝静脉解剖正常的薄层MSCT断层图像及其三维重建图像,在冠状断层上对其门静脉肝段进行精确划分。结果：经胆囊、门静脉左支及肝左静脉的冠状断面上,肝中静脉主干是划分右前上叶和左前下叶的识别标志,门静脉左支角部是左前下叶的段间裂识别标志,亦是右前上叶和左前下叶的亚段间裂识别标志。经肝门静脉主干的冠状断面上,门静脉右前支主干是右前上叶的段间裂识别标志,该层面以前为右前上叶的腹侧段,该层面以后则为右前上叶的背侧段。经网膜孔的冠状断面上、下腔静脉的右缘是划分尾状叶和右半肝的识别标志,门静脉右后支主干是划分右前上叶背侧段和右后下叶下段的标志,经下腔静脉和肝右静脉的冠状面上,肝右静脉主干是划分右前上叶的背侧段和右后下叶上段的标志;门静脉右后支主干是右后下叶的段间裂识别标志。结论：国人门静脉肝段在冠状断面上的精确划分,不仅有利于肝内微小病变的精确定位,且有利于探索新的和更加安全的外科术式。     

国人肝段的再认识

目的:对肝内门静脉和肝静脉重新认识,提出一种新的国人肝段划分方法,为影像学和肝外科提供断层解剖学资料。方法:使用50例上腹部连续断层标本和20例多层螺旋CT图像及三维重建图像,研究了肝内门静脉的走行和分布以及肝静脉及其属支的回流范围及其两者之间的相互关系。结果:国人肝段新的划分方法:门静脉右支主干存在时,依肝中静脉所在的正中裂将肝分为左、右半肝。右半肝被一弯曲的右叶间裂分成右前上叶和右后下叶。右前上叶依垂直段间裂分为腹侧和背侧段。右前上叶的腹侧段被水平亚段间裂分为上、下两个亚段。右后下叶依水平段间裂分为上、下两段。肝左静脉主干存在时,依肝左静脉主干所在的左叶间裂将左半肝分成左后上叶和左前下叶。左前下叶依左段间裂分为内侧和外侧段。水平亚段间裂将左前下叶的内侧段分为上、下两个亚段。依弧形背裂分尾状叶和右前上叶及左前下叶内侧段。结论:国人肝段新的划分法不仅有利于肝内微小病变的精确定位,而且便于肝外科探索新的和更加安全的术式来施行各种肝切除和肝移植。     

肝静脉的冠状断层解剖学研究

目的为MRI和多层螺旋CT在冠状断面上诊断肝疾患及肝外科手术提供断层解剖学依据。方法用30例成人躯干部连续冠状断层标本、10例成人腹部MRI冠状图像及5例成人肝内管道多层螺旋CT三维重建图像,观测了肝左、中、右静脉及其重要属支的走行、分布及其与肝门静脉的关系。结果依左外叶的外形特征,将肝左静脉的回流形式分为4型。来自段Ⅷ腹侧部的静脉全部汇入肝中静脉,来自段Ⅷ背侧部的静脉全部汇入肝右静脉。而位于段Ⅷ腹侧部和背侧部之间的静脉（V8i）,其回流形式可分为3型。肝右静脉的主干多出现于下腔静脉及其稍后层面,在冠状断面上可分为4型。结论冠状断面在显示肝静脉及其属支的上、下走行方面具有明显优势。以V8i为标志,将段Ⅷ分为腹侧和背侧两个亚段。这种亚段划分有利于探讨一种新的和更加安全的肝外科手术方式。     

右半肝肝段解剖研究进展

对肝内血管解剖结构及肝段的准确认识是肝切除术前评估和活体肝移植肝段选择的基础。特别是活体肝移植供体肝段的选择,需要考虑到肝段的体积、门脉及动脉血供和静脉回流,更需要对肝内各管道的解剖结构有精确的把握。右半肝管道立体交叉关系复杂,门静脉及肝静脉变异均多见。国际上通用的Couinaud肝段划分法,将右半肝分为4段,段Ⅷ、段Ⅴ为上下关系,段Ⅶ,段Ⅵ为上下关系。但随着肝脏手术的进展,影像学技术的提高,人们对右半肝肝段解剖划分提出质疑并有了新的观点。大部分学者倾向于以肝内门静脉3级分支分布形式作为划分右半肝肝段的主要依据,同时肝静脉引流情况也是重要的辅助依据,但分段方式并未形成统一。     

右半肝内门静脉的断层影像解剖学研究

目的 探讨右半肝内门静脉的走行、分布规律及门静脉肝裂和肝静脉的关系,进而为肝段的划分提供断层解剖学依据. 方法使用30例上腹部连续断层标本(10例横断面、20例冠状面)以及20例多层螺旋CT图像和三维图像,探讨右半肝内门静脉的分支类型和常见变异以及肝内门静脉和肝静脉之间的关系. 结果 50例标本和图像中,右半肝内门静脉均可分为前上和后下两组分支.76%(38150)的门静脉右前支的分支向后分布至肝右静脉后方的部分区域.40%(20/50)的门静脉右后支的起始部向尾侧发出的第一分支分布至肝右静脉前的部分区域.门静脉右前支的分布区域,越过肝中静脉偏向左侧,在15例无门静脉右支主干的标本和图像中尤其明显.肝右前叶无明显横裂存在.门静脉的亚段分型有显著的个体差异,且无优势分支类型. 结论右半肝可分为右前上叶和右后下叶,两叶之间为一弯曲的"裂隙".肝右前上叶有一恒定的纵裂存在.肝右静脉不是右叶间裂的准确定位标志,尤其在其上份和下份.肝中静脉不是正中裂的准确识别标志,尤其在门静脉右支主干缺如的人群中.     

肝左内叶及右前叶肝段超声解剖

目的:为发生于肝左内叶和右前叶的肝占位性疾病治疗提供超声解剖资料。方法:随机选取健康成人61例(男42,女19),利用彩色多普勒超声诊断仪经腹途径获取各断面超声声像图,并观察测量。结果:Ⅳa亚段内门静脉分支仅见1种类型;Ⅳb亚段内门静脉分支见2种类型,分别占62.30%、37.70%;右前叶门静脉分支见3种类型:a型占75.41%,b型占16.39%,c型占8.20%;左内叶两亚段间有48例可见肝静脉属支走行,占78.69%,其中肝中静脉属支占95.83%,肝左静脉属支占4.17%;右前叶两亚段间有54例可见肝静脉属支走行,占88.52%,其中肝中静脉属支占92.59%,肝右静脉属支占7.41%。结论:在超声水平,进一步证明右前叶两亚段间及左内叶两亚段间存在肝静脉属支,并可作为相邻两亚段间分界的解剖学标志。     

肝内胆管的应用解剖与肝内胆管结石手术入路的研究

目的 探讨肝内叶、段胆管的解剖结构及肝内胆管结石的手术入路。方法 通过研究12例成人肝脏标本的肝内胆管与血管的位置、毗邻关系,设计出经肝的脏面显露左右肝管,经肝的膈面显露肝内叶、段胆管相对合的手术入路,并结合治疗56例复杂性肝内胆管结石患者。结果 左右肝管均位于肝脏脏面门静脉左右干的前上缘;左内叶、右前叶胆管位于相应门静脉的前内侧。右后叶胆管位于门静脉右前支或右前叶下段支脏面测侧者占66.7％(8/12);位于门静脉右后支脏面深侧或后上缘者占83.3％(10/12)。左外叶胆管位于门静脉矢状部脏面深侧者占91.7％(11/12)。选择经肝的脏面显露左右肝管,经肝的膈面显露肝内叶、段胆管相结合的手术入路,治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石患者56例,临床疗效满意。结论 选择经肝的脏面与膈面相结合的手术方式,较易取出结石。     

肝右前叶Glisson系统的解剖结构特点及其临床意义

目的观察右前叶Glisson系统的解剖结构特点,为实施右前叶病灶的精准肝切除术提供解剖学基础。方法剥离解剖20例成人无病变尸体肝脏标本,对肝右前叶Glisson系统进行形态学观察,采集相关数据并进行统计学分析。结果 G右总分出G右后与G右前的两支型占95%,G右总分出G右前与G6、G7的3支型占5%。G右总长(2.36±0.56)cm,G右前长(2.61±0.72)cm。G右前根部距肝脏面的深度(1.99±0.43)cm,G右前末端距膈面的深度(4.84±1.95)cm,G右前主干与MHV主干的最短距离(1.61±0.90)cm,G右前主干与RHV主干的最短距离(1.89±0.80)cm,G右前主干与MHV主干的夹角(74.4±16.8)°,G右前主干与RHV主干的夹角(73.1±19.6)°。右前叶Glisson系统的主干末端呈Couinaud型占20%,竜崇正型占65%,复合型占15%;3级分支数目呈2~6支不等。结论右前叶Glisson系统走形存在着明显的个体差异,分布情况不完全符合Couinaud 8段所描述,在实施右前叶精准肝切除术之前应掌握右前叶Glisson系统的解剖特点,有助于设计合理的手术方式。     

COUINAUD肝段法在横断面上的划分及其在影像学中的应用

作者在30具男性成年尸体连续横断面上，追踪观察了肝静脉系统和肝门静脉鞘系在肝内的属支和分支，下腔静脉肝后段以及肝表面的沟，裂，探讨了如何按Couinaud肝段法划分横断面上的肝叶，肝段的问题，并讨论了在影像学诊断中的有关问题。     

肝裂的定位与肝段的划分

目的：精确定位肝裂与肝段,为肝脏病变的诊断和治疗提供解剖学依据。方法：用过氯乙烯分色灌注肝静脉和门静脉。固定灌注后的肝脏,再用雕刻法移去肝组织,保留肝静脉和门静脉,并对其进行详细地解剖学观察。结果：3条肝静脉的位置可精确定位3条肝裂。门静脉左、右支可精确定位1条段间裂。肝裂和段问裂将肝脏分成5叶8段。结论：肝裂和段间裂确定了肝叶和肝段的精确定位与划分,对肝脏病变的诊断和治疗非常重要。     

Reconfirmation of the right medial division of the portal venous system of liver

With the development of hepatic surgery and radiology, an increasing amount of researchers have reported discrepancies between the real distribution of the hepatic portal vein branches and Couinaud's segmentation, especially for further division of the right medial division. The present study investigated 25 cadaveric liver dissections and 30 three-dimensional reconstruction images of intrahepatic vessels. The ramifications, course, distribution and quantity of the portal branches were analyzed. An oblique fissure that had few vessels was found among third-order branches of the hepatic portal vein of the right medial division. The right medial division could be redivided into the ventral subsegment and dorsal subsegment by this oblique fissure. A hepatic vein coursed in the oblique fissure between the ventral subsegment and dorsal subsegment. The hepatic vein could serve as an anatomical landmark of the inter-subsegmental plane. This new method of identifying further division of the right medial division is a novel concept providing further information on conventional segmental anatomy.     

Configuration of the liver segment observed in the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk at the hepatic hilum

After preparing threparing the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk at the hepatic hilum, 60 human livers (35, entirely; 25, partly) were dissected to reveal segmental configuration and the supplying portal vein branches. We usually observed two combinations of segments, i.e., S2, 4, 5 and 8 or S2, 3, 4, 5 and 8, in the frontal section including the origin of the left portal trunk. However, S8 was sometimes absent in the section when S4 extended to the right and/or upper side. S2 was consistently located dorsal to S3 despite the fact that 11.7% of the specimens carried an unexpected configuration showing a "lower" S2 in combined with an "upper" S3 in the frontal section. The latter case was associated with specific S2 and S3 segmental branches maintaining horizontal courses along a common plane. S4, S5 and S8 were usually arranged from the ventral to the dorsal aspect in this order. Four types of ventral short branches originated at or near the primary portal divisions and supplied the hilar parenchyme adjacent to S4 and/or the anterior segment (S5 or S8). These ventral short branches tended to be associated with the variations of the primary division. Dissection of the liver after frontal section provided a better understanding of the segmental configuration rather than an approach from the hepatic hilum.     

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma with marked liver deformity and secondary Budd–Chiari syndrome: Pathological and radiological correlation

A case of malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver in a 48-year-old woman with severe portal hypertension and marked deformity of the liver is presented. This woman had a history of mild liver dysfunction since the age of 30 years, and abdominal distention, esophageal varices, splenomegaly and ascites since October 1996. Imaging examinations revealed liver deformity with severe atrophy of the left lobe and the anterior segment of the right lobe. Celiac arteriography showed narrowing and upward deviation of the proper hepatic artery, and occlusion of the left and right anterior hepatic arteries. Since March 1997, hepatic venography showed stenosis in the right hepatic vein truncus. Budd-Chiari syndrome was clinically diagnosed. She died in June 1997. The autopsy disclosed massive tumor embolism in the left and right anterior portal branches, few in the hepatic artery, and occlusion of the left and right anterior hepatic arteries. The extensive tumor embolism resulted in portal hypertension, and atrophy of the left lobe. The anterior segment of the right lobe was probably caused by the occlusion of both the hepatic arteries and the portal veins. The posterior segment of the right lobe, without massive tumor embolism in its portal branch, appeared hypertrophic.     

左外叶活体肝移植的解剖学研究

目的：模拟左外叶活体肝移植门静脉、肝动脉和胆管的切取方法。方法：解剖正常人肝脏标本30具，观察肝脏铸型标本30具，测量门静脉、肝动脉及胆管长度、管径及属支或分支分布情况。结果：左外叶门静脉的血供来自门静脉左支，主要为左外叶上段门静脉支、左外叶下段门静脉支；动脉主要来源于肝固有动脉、肝左动脉、肝中动脉，偶有迷走动脉支；胆道引流属支有左外叶上段胆管支、左外叶下段胆管支。结论：左外叶解剖变异较多，活体取肝前应仔细研究其结构特点，设计合理的切取模式；对门静脉、肝动脉和胆管支需行必要的整形，以便与受体相应的管道进行吻合。     

Arterial supply and biliary drainage of the dorsal liver: A dissection study using controlled specimens

Liver surgeons favor using the entity called the 'dorsal liver' (i.e. the caudate lobe and other paracavally located liver parenchyme of segments 7 and 8). According to minute dissection of 48 livers, we describe the territories of the left/right portal veins, hepatic ducts and hepatic arteries in the dorsal liver. In the caudate lobe, the right hepatic artery, rather than the left hepatic artery (23/48 vs 19/48 for right vs left, respectively), tended to supply the 'left' portal vein territory. Similarly, paradoxical drainage patterns, such as the right hepatic duct draining the left portal vein territory, were found in seven of 48 livers. In the territory of the hilar bifurcation, right hepatic artery dominance was also evident and various bile drainage patterns were found. These included double drainage by the bilateral hepatic ducts (3/48) and drainage into the confluence of bilateral ducts (6/48). In contrast, the arterial supply and biliary drainage of the paracavally located parenchyme of segments 7 and 8 usually depended on the proper segmental arteries and ducts and their variations were within the range of those found in other parts of the right lobe. Therefore, the dorsal liver concept may not be anatomical but, rather, simply aimed at usefulness in surgery. Nevertheless, clear subdivision of the caudate lobe according to biliary drainage and/or arterial supply seemed difficult because of the paradoxical relatioships among the portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct. Consequently, the present results support extended surgery based on the dorsal liver concept for carcinomas involving the caudate lobe.     

Location of the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe of the human liver with special reference to the configuration of hepatic portal vein branches

The topographic anatomy of the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe of the human liver has not been clearly described to date. To this end we hypothesize the existence of a precaudate plane, a flat or slightly curved plane defined by the ventral margins of the ligamentum venosum and the hilar plate. Using 76 cadaveric livers, we investigated whether the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe extended ventral to this plane and whether the paracaval caudate branch of the portal vein (PC) ran through this plane to its ventral side. In 28 of the specimens (36.8%), the PC extended over the plane to a variable depth: less than 10 mm in 10 specimens, 10-20 mm in 10, and more than 20 mm in eight specimens. This ventral extension of the PC consistently included its penetration into the dome-like area under the terminals of the three major hepatic veins; therefore, the ventrally extended PC often interdigitated with these veins and their tributaries (in practice, the ventral margin of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe could generally be considered to run alongside the middle hepatic vein). Moreover, the ventral extension of the PC often reached the upper, diaphragmatic surface or the dorsal surface of the liver immediately to the right of the inferior vena cava. Several branches (termed border branches) in the ventral extension were difficult to identify as belonging to the PC. We discuss both the marginal configuration of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe and how to identify and operate on the ventrally extended PC and related border branches during liver surgery.     

Right ligamentum teres joining to the right branch of the portal vein

Ligamentum teres joining to the right branch of the portal vein in a 79-year-old Japanese male cadaver was noted during student dissection at Kumamoto University in 2004. The ligamentum teres entered the liver along the left side of the gallbladder fossa. The quadrate lobe was not distinguished from the left lobe in the visceral surface. When the liver parenchyma was removed by tearing off to expose the branches of the portal and hepatic veins, it was clarified that the ligamentum teres unusually joined to the bifurcation of the upper anterior and lower anterior branches of the right branch of the portal vein. The ligamentum teres is the remnant of the umbilical vein working throughout fetal life. Initially a pair of the umbilical veins entered the sinus venosus. During the fourth and fifth weeks they connect to the hepatic sinusoids, which become the portal and hepatic veins, and the parts entering the sinus venosus of both umbilical veins disappear. By the eighth week, as all remainder of the right umbilical vein disappears, the left umbilical vein is the only one to carry blood from the placenta to the liver. It results in the ligamentum teres joining to the left branch of the portal vein. However, in the present case it is thought that the right umbilical vein remained instead of the left one for some reason, and it then became the right ligamentum teres joining to the right branch of the portal vein.