Predictors of the timing of natural menopause in the Multiethnic Cohort Study

The timing of natural menopause has implications for several health endpoints; in particular, it is a risk factor for breast cancer. The authors investigated factors influencing the timing of natural menopause among 95,704 women with a mean age of 59.7 years (10th-90th percentile range, 47.0-71.0) in five racial/ethnic groups in the Multiethnic Cohort Study, including non-Latina Whites, Japanese Americans, African Americans, Native Hawai'ians, and Latinas. The authors investigated whether race/ethnicity and several lifestyle and reproductive characteristics were associated with the timing of natural menopause. Race/ethnicity was a significant independent predictor of the timing of natural menopause. Other factors, including smoking, age at menarche, parity, and body mass index, did not significantly alter the race/ethnicity-specific hazard ratios. Relative to non-Latina Whites, natural menopause occurred earlier among Latinas (US-born Latinas: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07, 1.14; non-US-born Latinas: HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.30) and later among Japanese Americans (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.95). These results support the hypothesis that the timing of natural menopause is driven by a combination of genetic, reproductive, and lifestyle factors.     

Reversal of Associations Between Spanish Language Use and Mammography and Pap Smear Testing

Latina women are less likely to utilize cancer screening services than are non-Latina White women. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between preferred language (English vs. Spanish) and receipt of mammography and Pap-smear testing among US Latinas and non-Latinas. Cross-sectional analysis of the 2008 and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. While Latinas responding to the BRFSS in English or in Spanish had unadjusted lower odds of receiving mammography testing, in multivariable analysis Latinas responding-in-Spanish had 2.20 times the odds (OR = 2.20, 95 % CI, 1.90–2.55) of reporting mammography compared to non-Latinas. Similarly, Latinas responding-in- Spanish had lower unadjusted odds of receiving Pap-smear testing. However, Latinas responding-in-Spanish had 2.37 times the odds (OR = 2.37 CI, 2.04–2.75) of reporting having received Pap smear testing compared to non-Latinas in multivariate analysis. The results of this paper further confirm the “reversed associations” among Latinas and mammography and Pap smear testing described in previous studies and suggest that in addition to insurance status, preferred language may be a key variable contributing to the reversal phenomenon observed among Latinas.     

Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether Latinas differ from non-Latinas in having undergone recent mammography, clinical breast examination, or Papanicolaou testing, as well as the contribution of sociodemographic and health care variables to screening. METHODS: We used data from the 1991 National Health Interview Survey Health Promotion and Disease Prevention supplement. RESULTS: Latinas were less likely than non-Latina Whites to have undergone mammography (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57, 0.88), but this difference was attenuated when we controlled for socioeconomic factors (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.70, 1.15). Latinas did not differ from Whites on Papanicolaou tests or clinical breast examinations. Quality of and access to health care predicted screening. CONCLUSIONS: Latina ethnicity does not predict breast and cervical cancer screening behavior independent of sociodemographic and structural factors.     

Sociocultural Determinants of Teenage Childbearing Among Latinas in California

Objectives U.S. Latinas have a persistently high rate of teenage childbearing, which is associated with adverse outcomes for both mother and child. This study was designed to investigate the roles of socioeconomic factors and acculturation in teenage childbearing in this population. Methods Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of measures of acculturation (language spoken at home, nativity, and age at immigration) and respondents’ parents’ education with age at first birth in a stratified sample of post-partum women in California. Results The unadjusted odds ratio for teenage birth for Latinas versus non-Latina Whites was 5.2 (95% CI 4.1–6.6). Nativity was not significantly associated with teen birth, but speaking Spanish at home was positively associated and immigrating at a later age was negatively associated with teen birth. Overall, these measures of acculturation accounted for 17% (95% CI 8–28%) of the difference in odds of teen birth between Latinas and non-Latina Whites. Higher levels of education among respondents’ parents had differentially protective effects across the racial/ethnic groups. Controlling for disparities in respondents’ parents’ education without changing its differential effects across racial/ethnic groups reduced the odds ratio for Latinas compared to non-Latina Whites by 30% (95% CI 14–60%). Conclusion These findings call into question common assumptions about the protective effect of acculturation on teen fertility and suggest that improving childhood socioeconomic factors among Latinas may decrease teen childbearing.     

Latina Birth Outcomes in California: Not so Paradoxical

Objectives To investigate Latina-White differences in birth outcomes in California from 2003 to 2010, looking for evidence of the often-cited “Latina paradox” and assessing the possible role of socioeconomic factors in observed differences. MethodsUsing statewide-representative data from the California Maternal and Infant Health Assessment, an annual population-based postpartum survey, we compared rates of preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW) in five groups: U.S.-born non-Latina Whites (“Whites”), U.S.-born Mexican–Americans, U.S.-born non-Mexican Latinas, Mexican immigrants, and non-Mexican Latina immigrants. Logistic regression models examined the relative likelihood of PTB and LBW for women in each Latina subgroup compared with Whites, before and after adjustment for socioeconomic and other covariates. Results In unadjusted analyses, women in each Latina subgroup appeared more likely than White women to have PTB and LBW, although the increased likelihood of LBW among Mexican immigrants was statistically non-significant. After adjustment for less favorable socioeconomic characteristics among Latinas compared with Whites, observed differences in the estimated likelihoods of PTB or LBW for Latina subgroups relative to Whites were attenuated and (with the exception of PTB among U.S.-born Mexican Americans) no longer statistically significant. Conclusions We found no evidence of a “Latina paradox” in birth outcomes, which some have cited as evidence that social disadvantage is not always health-damaging. As observed in several previous studies, our findings were non-paradoxical: consistent with their socioeconomic disadvantage, Latinas had worse birth outcomes than non-Latina White women. Policy-makers should not rely on a “Latina paradox” to ensure good birth outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged Latina women.     

Developing and Evaluating a Spanish Tel-Med Message on Breast Cancer

A Spanish TEL-MED message on breast cancer was designed for Delaware. The message, created from a focus group of Latino professionals and volunteers from the American Cancer Society, Delaware Division, provides information for Latinas on breast cancer. In one minute, forty-five seconds the message answers in Spanish the following questions: (1) What are the symptoms of breast cancer? (2) What can women do to protect themselves against breast cancer? (3) What is a mammogram? (4) When should I have a mammogram done? (5) How much does a mammogram cost? The message also provides information on where to obtain low cost or free mammograms. A pamphlet in Spanish, featuring a picture of an elderly Latina listening to the phone message, describes how to access the tape. The message targets older Latinas who prefer to speak Spanish. The American Cancer Society, Delaware Division, distributed a press release featuring the Spanish TEL-MED and circulated the pamphlets to Latino organizations and churches. Evaluation of the TEL-MED message in Spanish suggests it to be an innovative way to reach older Latino women. The Spanish message on breast cancer was requested 58% as often as the breast cancer message in English, and 193% more often than the epilepsy tape in Spanish. The peak period for the calls to the Spanish TEL-MED message occurred after the initial promotional activities. These findings suggest that education of older Latinas on breast cancer can be augmented by the use of TEL-MED message in Spanish. They further suggest that the combination of TEL-MED and mass media campaign had a positive effect on Spanish speaking users of the TEL-MED.     

Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates?

Breast cancer incidence rates in the United States are substantially lower among Asian-American women than among White or African-American women. The authors determined whether mammographic density reflects these ethnic differences by evaluating mammograms from 442 White, African-American, and Asian-American women without breast cancer who served as controls in one of two population-based, breast cancer case-control studies conducted in Los Angeles, California, in 1994-1998. Absolute and percent mammographic densities were determined with a previously developed and validated computer-assisted method. Data were analyzed using multiple regression methods. Mean age-adjusted percent mammographic density was significantly higher in Asian Americans (35.9%) than in African Americans (27.8%, p < 0.05) but was no longer significant after further adjustment for body mass index. After adjustment for age, body mass index, selected menstrual/reproductive factors, and family history, absolute mammographic density was statistically significantly lower in Asian Americans than in African Americans (p < 0.05) but not than in Whites. The ethnic difference in absolute mammographic density was particularly evident among women older than age 50 years. Additional adjustment for breast size reduced these ethnic differences. This study suggests that absolute but not percent mammographic density reflects the lower breast cancer incidence rates of Asian Americans in relation to those of African Americans and Whites.     

Stage at diagnosis and survival in a multiethnic cohort of prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects of socioeconomic status and comorbidity on stage of disease and survival among 1509 population-based prostate cancer patients. METHODS: We applied logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression to data from Whites, African Americans, and Asian Americans who were diagnosed from 1987 to 1991. RESULTS: Patients with existing comorbid conditions were less likely than those without these conditions to be diagnosed with advanced cancer. Compared with Whites, African Americans (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 2.2) and foreign-born Asian Americans (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.0, 2.4) were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer. Among men with localized disease, prostate cancer death rates were higher for African Americans than for Whites (death rate ratio = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.2, 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the need for further investigation of factors that affect access to and use of health care among African Americans and Asian Americans.     

The “Latina Epidemiologic Paradox”: Contrasting Patterns of Adverse Birth Outcomes in U.S.-Born and Foreign-Born Latinas

BackgroundThe “Latina epidemiologic paradox” postulates that despite socioeconomic disadvantages, Latina mothers have a lower risk for delivering low birth weight (LBW) babies than non-Latina Whites. However, these patterns may be changing over time and may differ depending on the mother's birthplace and legal status in the United States. This study investigates differences in risk for three birth outcomes among Whites, U.S.-born Latinas, and foreign-born Latinas.MethodsWe undertook a cross-sectional study of rates of LBW, preterm, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births among 196,617 women delivering live, singleton births in Utah from 2004 to 2007. Each group was compared using logistic regression.ResultsU.S.-born Latinas had a similar or greater risk for all three outcomes when compared with Whites. Foreign-born Latinas had lower risk for preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.90) compared with Whites, but not for LBW and SGA; foreign-born Latinas had a lower risk for LBW (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74–0.92), preterm birth (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.89), and SGA (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83–0.99) compared with U.S.-born Latinas. Among foreign-born Latinas only, there was no difference in risk between documented (i.e., those who had a legal social security number) and undocumented women for LBW, preterm birth, or SGA.ConclusionsThese data support the existence of a variation of the “Latina paradox” among Latinas according to birthplace, where U.S.-born Latinas do not experience better birth outcomes than Whites, but foreign-born Latinas experience better birth outcomes for several endpoints compared with U.S.-born Latinas. Prevention efforts may prove more effective by considering the different composition of risk factors among foreign- and U.S.-born Latina populations.     

Racial/ethnic differences in endometrial cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study

Few studies have examined differences in endometrial cancer risk among ethnic groups in the United States. The authors assessed the extent to which known risk factors for endometrial cancer explain the racial/ethnic differences in risk among 46,933 postmenopausal African-American, Native-Hawaiian, Japanese-American, Latina, and White women recruited to the prospective Multiethnic Cohort Study in 1993-1996. During a 7.3-year follow up period, 321 incident endometrial cancer cases were identified among these women. Data on known/suspected risk factors were obtained from baseline questionnaires, and comparisons of endometrial cancer incidence across racial/ethnic groups were estimated using log-linear proportional hazard models. Later age at menopause, unopposed estrogen therapy use, and obesity were associated with increased risk, while increasing parity and increasing duration of oral contraceptive use were associated with decreased risk. The relative risks for endometrial cancer (vs. Whites) were 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53, 1.08) for African Americans, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.46) for Native Hawaiians, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.83) for Japanese Americans, and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.87) for Latinas. After adjustment for the risk factors, the relative risks were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.98) for African Americans, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.46) for Native Hawaiians, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54, 1.01) for Japanese Americans, and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.92) for Latinas. Results from this study show that the interethnic differences in endometrial cancer risk do not appear to be explained by differences in the distribution of known risk factors among women of different races/ethnicities.     

Perception of racial barriers to health care in the rural South

We assessed how commonly people in the rural South perceive racial barriers to care, the characteristics of the people among whom this perception is most common and whether this perception is associated with satisfaction with and use of health services. We analyzed telephone survey data collected in 2002-3, using weighted statistical techniques and multivariate logistic regression in analyses stratified by race. Fifty-four percent of African Americans and 23% of Whites reported that they perceive racial barriers to care in their communities. African Americans who were middle-aged or older, male, or who report being in good-to-excellent health were more likely to perceive racial barriers. Whites who were younger, less educated, and uninsured were more likely than other Whites to perceive racial barriers. For African Americans, perceptions of racial barriers were associated with lower likelihood of being satisfied with care, but not with use of preventive services. The perception of racial barriers to health care is prevalent in the rural South, especially among African Americans. The consequences of this perception may include mistrust and dissatisfaction with medical care.     

The “Latina Epidemiologic Paradox” Revisited: The Role of Birthplace and Acculturation in Predicting Infant Low Birth Weight for Latinas in Los Angeles, CA

The "Latina epidemiologic paradox" refers to the observation that despite socioeconomic disadvantages, Latina mothers in the United States (US) have a similar or lower risk for delivering an infant with low birth weight (LBW) compared to non-Latina White mothers. An analogous paradox may exist between foreign-born (FB) and US-born (USB) Latinas. Our goal was to assess differences in LBW in USB Latinas, FB Latinas, and non-Latina Whites in Los Angeles County in 2003 using birth records and survey data. Using logistic regression, we estimated associations between LBW and birthplace/ethnicity in a birth cohort and nested survey responder group and between LBW and acculturation in responders to a follow-up survey. USB Latinas and FB Latinas had a higher prevalence of LBW infants compared to Whites (odds ratio [OR]?=?1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?(1.17, 1.53) and OR?=?1.32, 95% CI?=?(1.18, 1.49), respectively); when we adjusted for additional maternal risk factors these point estimates were attenuated, and interval estimates were consistent with a modest positive or inverse association. Among Latinas only, LBW was more common for high-acculturated FB and USB Latinas compared to low-acculturated FB Latinas, and there was limited evidence that environmental or behavior risk factors had less impact in low-acculturated Latinas. In summary, adjusting only for demographics, Latinas in our study were more likely to have LBW infants compared to Whites, in contrast to the Latina paradox hypothesis. Furthermore, adjusting for environmental or behavioral factors attenuated the positive association, but there was little evidence that Latinas had a lower prevalence of LBW regardless of the variables included in the models. Finally, among Latinas, there was limited evidence that associations between known risk factors and LBW were modified by acculturation.     

The deep South network for cancer control: eliminating cancer disparities through community-academic collaboration

African Americans have a substantially increased mortality rate compared to Whites in many cancers, including breast and cervix. The Deep South Network for Cancer Control (the Network) was established to develop sustainable community infrastructure to promote cancer awareness, enhance participation of African Americans and other special populations in clinical trials, recruit and train minority investigators, and develop and test innovative community-based cancer control measures to eliminate cancer mortality disparities in special populations. This article describes the steps necessary to form the network and the process and activities required to establish it as an effective infrastructure for eliminating disparities between Whites and African Americans in the United States.     

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort

Previous studies on nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and breast cancer have produced mixed results. Incident invasive cases of breast cancer from the Multiethnic Cohort (African Americans, Caucasians, Japanese Americans, Latinas, and Native Hawaiians from Hawaii and California) were identified from 1993 to 2002. Data on aspirin, acetaminophen, and other NSAID (ibuprofen, naproxen, indomethacin) use were based on a self-administered questionnaire at baseline (1993-1996). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models provided estimates of hazard rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The authors observed no associations between breast cancer risk and duration of aspirin use for current or past users (hazard rate ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.25 and hazard rate ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.84, 1.27 for > or =6 years of use, respectively) compared with nonusers. However, duration of current other NSAID use was protective (hazard rate ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.95 for > or =6 years of use; p(trend) = 0.01) against the risk of breast cancer, while past use was not (hazard rate ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 1.30 for > or =6 years of use). Analyses by ethnicity and hormone receptor status showed that the protective effect of current other NSAID use was limited to Caucasians and African Americans and to women with at least one positive hormone receptor. This study found duration of current other NSAID use to be protective against breast cancer risk.     

Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?

OBJECTIVES: This study examined knowledge about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening among African Americans and Whites. Because PSA screening for prostate cancer is controversial, professional organizations recommend informed consent for screening. METHODS: Men (n = 304) attending outpatient clinics were surveyed for their knowledge about and experience with screening. RESULTS: Most men did not know the key facts about screening with PSA. African Americans appeared less knowledgeable than Whites, but these differences were mediated by differences in educational level and experience with prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS: Public health efforts to improve informed consent for prostate cancer screening should focus on highlighting the key facts and developing different approaches for men at different levels of formal education and prior experience with screening.     

Breaking down barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening: a university-based prevention program for Latinas

INTRODUCTION: The lower rate of utilization of mammography and cervical cancer screening observed for Latinas in the United States has been attributed to cultural, economic, and linguistic barriers they may encounter. METHODS: A screening program was implemented offering cancer prevention education plus breast and cervical cancer screening to Latinas, as well as all necessary follow-up care, at no cost to the participant. RESULTS: In the first 6 years of this project, a total of 928 screening visits occurred; 53% were participants who had returned at least once for additional annual screening. Ninety-one percent of participants preferred speaking in Spanish to their health care providers; however, only 2% identified a primary care provider and 5% stated they had health care insurance. The participant characteristics and results of initial evaluation, as well as necessary follow-up studies, are presented. CONCLUSIONS: By removing economic concerns and by providing care and education through bilingual staff in a culturally sensitive environment, some of the barriers to cancer screening for Latinas were overcome. The success of the program is reflected by a high rate of return for additional annual screening by our participants.     

Quality of anticoagulation control: do race and language matter?

No studies have evaluated the quality of anticoagulation control among populations characterized by low socioeconomic status, diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, or limited English proficiency. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effects of race/ethnicity and language on anticoagulation outcomes among patients (N=864) receiving continuous anticoagulation services at a university-affiliated public hospital. White/non-Hispanic patients made up 24%, Asian/Pacific Islanders 33%, Hispanics 22%, African Americans 18%. English (63%), Spanish, (14%), and Cantonese (13%) were the most common languages. Mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 43%. After adjustment, TTR was lower for African Americans than for Whites (absolute difference, -8.7%, p< .001) and for Spanish-speaking than for English-speaking Hispanics (absolute difference, -7.2%, p< .05). There were no differences between Asian/Pacific Islanders and Whites, nor between Cantonese-speaking and English-speaking Asian/Pacific Islanders. Future research should examine mechanisms by which race/ethnicity and language affect quality of anticoagulation and evaluate programs to improve treatment in diverse communities.     

Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that health insurance payer and race might influence the care and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: We examined treatments received for all incident cases of colorectal cancer occurring in Florida in 1994 (n = 9551), using state tumor registry data. We also estimated the adjusted risk of death (through 1997), using proportional hazards regression analysis controlling for other predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Treatments received by patients varied considerably according to their insurance payer. Among non-Medicare patients, those in the following groups had higher adjusted risks of death relative to commercial fee-for-service insurance: commercial HMO (risk ratio [RR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18, 1.67; P = .0001), Medicaid (RR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.97; P = .02), and uninsured (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.77; P = .003). Non-Hispanic African Americans had higher mortality rates (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.37; P = .04) than non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with colorectal cancer who were uninsured or insured by Medicaid or commercial HMOs had higher mortality rates than patients with commercial fee-for-service insurance. Mortality was also higher among non-Hispanic African American patients.