Caudal block with 4 mg x kg-1 (1.6 ml x kg-1) of bupivacaine 0.25% in children undergoing surgical correction of congenital pyloric stenosis

BACKGROUND: Since 1970, bupivacaine 0.25% in a dose of 4 mg x kg-1 (1.6 ml x kg-1) has been used at the Hospital Infantil de México for caudal block in children undergoing surgical correction of congenital pyloric stenosis (CPS). Although this dose is considered unsafe, in our experience, it has been associated with a high success rate and a low incidence of adverse events. This experience has not been previously documented. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing surgical correction of CPS was studied. Nineteen patients received general anaesthesia while 223 received caudal block. The latter were then grouped according to the sedation technique. The rate of successful caudal blocks and complications were considered the major outcomes of the study, whereas the postsurgical fasting period and hospital stay were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of success of caudal block was 96%. Anaesthetic complications related to bupivacaine were present in 1.3%. Mortality occurred in the postoperatory period in one septic patient who also was suffering from gastroschisis that required general anaesthesia. Postoperatory fasting period and hospital stay tended to be higher with general anaesthesia than caudal block. However, of the 19 patients receiving general anaesthesia, five suffered serious comorbidity and nine were failed caudal blocks. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25% (4 mg x kg-1) was associated with a low rate of anaesthetic complications. Further prospective studies to clarify the risks and benefits are required.     

Comparison of clonidine 1 microgram kg-1 with morphine 30 micrograms kg-1 for post-operative caudal analgesia in children

In a prospective randomized study in children, we compared caudal bupivacaine-clonidine with bupivacaine-morphine to evaluate whether clonidine can be used as an alternative to morphine in caudal anaesthesia. Caudal anaesthesia was administered in 36 children undergoing orchidopexy, hernia repair or circumcision, using 1.5 mL kg-1 bupivacaine 0.18% with either 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine (group 1) or 30 micrograms kg-1 morphine (group 2). Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, anaesthetic requirements, recovery time and pain score were monitored for 24 h. Eleven children in group 1 and nine children in group 2 did not need any supplementary systemic analgesics throughout the 24-h observation period. Mean (+/- SD) duration of analgesia in the remaining patients was 6.3 h (+/- 3.3 h) in group 1 and 7.1 h (+/- 3.4 h) in group 2 (P = 0.43). Recovery time after anaesthesia was significantly longer in group 1 (16.6 +/- 8.8 min) than in group 2 (11.5 +/- 4.7 min) (P < 0.05). We conclude that analgesia provided by 1 microgram kg-1 clonidine added to caudal bupivacaine is comparable with that provided by 30 micrograms kg-1 caudal morphine with bupivacaine. Clonidine at this low dose did not cause respiratory depression.     

Effect of caudal block on the plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations in paediatric patients undergoing ilioinguinal herniorrhaphy

This study compared the effect of two anaesthetic techniques on the catecholamine levels in children undergoing ilioinguinal herniorrhaphy. Forty male paediatric patients ASA class I were allocated randomly to one of two groups: the control group (n = 20) received general anaesthesia including intravenous fentanyl; and the caudal group (n = 20) received caudal anaesthesia with bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mL kg-1 combined with general anaesthesia but without opioids. Plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations were measured at induction, at the end of surgery and in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). In the caudal group, there were significant decreases in the adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations at the end of surgery and in the PACU compared with baseline concentrations. In the control group, there was a significant increase in PACU concentrations of adrenaline and noradrenaline compared with baseline concentrations. These findings suggest that the addition of a caudal block to general anaesthesia in children undergoing ilioinguinal herniorrhaphy decreases significantly the neurohormonal responses to surgery.     

A comparison of two concentrations of bupivacaine and adrenaline with and without fentanyl in paediatric inguinal herniorrhaphy

This study was designed to determine whether administration of caudal bupivacaine with fentanyl would have any effect on analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy repair. Fifty-six outpatient paediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair were evaluated. Patients received, in a randomized manner, 1 ml.kg-1 of either bupivacaine 0.25% or 0.125% with or without fentanyl 1 microg.kg-1. There was no difference in pain scores in the hospital, the night of surgery, or 24 h postoperatively nor was there a difference in the oral analgesics administered between any of the groups. There was a higher incidence of vomiting at home in both 0.25% bupivacaine groups irrespective of the use of fentanyl. The 0.125% bupivacaine group had significantly more patients who received intravenous fentanyl in the PACU than did the other three groups (P<0.001). Increasing the concentration of bupivacaine from 0. 125% to 0.25% increased the incidence of postoperative vomiting. We recommend that clinicians utilize bupivacaine 0.125% with 1 microg. kg-1 fentanyl as the caudal injectate in paediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.     

Caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in paediatric surgery

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate analgesia and side-effects of caudal neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine in paediatric surgery. METHODS: We studied children, aged 1-5 years, undergoing elective surgery (inguinal hernia and hypospadias). After standard induction of anaesthesia, caudal anaesthesia was performed. Group 1 received 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml.kg-1 and Group 2 received 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml x kg-1 with 1 microg x kg-1 neostigmine via the caudal route. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded before induction, after induction but before caudal anaesthesia, and then every 5 min after caudal anaesthesia. Haemodynamic, Toddler, Preschooler, Postoperative Pain Scale (TPPPS) pain score and sedation score values were recorded 30 min after extubation and at hours 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24. A pain score >3/10 resulted in administration of rectal paracetamol. The duration of postoperative analgesia was defined as the time between caudal drug injection and the first rectal paracetamol administration. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in demographic and haemodynamic date, duration of surgery and anaesthesia, time to extubation or sedation scores. The duration of postoperative pain relief did not differ between the two groups; 15.40 +/- 10.97 h for group 1 vs. 15.45 +/- 10.99 h for group 2 (P > 0.05). The incidence of nausea (three patients in group 2 and one patient in group 1) was not statistically significant. No other side-effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a single caudal injection of 1 microg x kg-1 neostigmine mixed with bupivacaine offers no significant advantage over bupivacaine alone for postoperative pain relief in children undergoing genitourinary surgery.     

Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol

BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation in children is frequently associated with the use of the new highly insoluble volatile anaesthetics. Rapid emergence has been cited as one of the possible causes. Propofol also permits rapid emergence from general anaesthesia but is not associated with agitation. METHODS: The emergence characteristics of children receiving sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia were examined. After induction with sevoflurane, 53 children, aged 2-36 months, who were undergoing ambulatory surgery, were randomized to receive maintenance anaesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol. Introperative analgesia with either 2 micro g x kg-1 of intravenous fentanyl or a caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine was supplied according to surgical procedure. An observer blinded to anaesthetic technique recorded the time to achieve extubation and recovery and assessed emergence behaviour. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon scores, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that the time to extubation and recovery were similar between the two study groups, but that emergence agitation was significantly higher in the sevoflurane group compared with the propofol group. No relationship between analgesic technique and agitation scores was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although both sevoflurane and propofol allow for rapid emergence from general anaesthesia, only sevoflurane is associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation in infants and young children. Rapid emergence does not fully explain this phenomena.     

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.     

The effect of epidural bupivacaine on maintenance requirements of sevoflurane evaluated by bispectral index in children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Combined (local and general) anaesthesia or Balanced (intravenous analgesics and inhalational hypnotics) anaesthesia are commonly used in paediatrics. The authors have investigated the influence of both types of anaesthesia on the requirements of sevoflurane to maintain an adequate level of hypnosis as measured by Bispectral index (at around 50) monitoring in paediatric orthopaedic patients. METHODS: Twenty-six orthopaedic surgery patients aged 2-15 yr were randomized to receive, during general sevoflurane anaesthesia, 5 microg kg-1 of intravenous fentanyl (Balanced anaesthesia group) or 1 mL kg-1 of caudal-epidural bupivacaine 0.25% (Combined anaesthesia group). The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was adjusted every 5 min in order to maintain Bispectral index values at around 50. RESULTS: Patients showed very similar Bispectral index values (P > 0.05) in both the Combined and the Balanced groups before anaesthesia (96.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 96.9 +/- 1.8), after induction (48.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 49.8 +/- 3.6) and after administration of analgesia (50.9 +/- 3.8 vs. 50.3 +/- 4.3). The sevoflurane end-tidal concentration requirements were similar in both the Combined and Balanced groups before administration of analgesia (2.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.4, P = 0.9415), but lower end-tidal concentrations were required by the Combined group than by the Balanced group (0.81 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5, P < 0.0001) in the first 20 min after administration of analgesia. CONCLUSION: Combined anaesthesia with epidural bupivacaine maintains the same Bispectral index values as Balanced anaesthesia during orthopaedic surgery in children without fentanyl and with a lower sevoflurane requirement.     

Comparison of caudal morphine and tramadol for postoperative pain control in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy

OBJECTIVES: We compared the quality and duration of analgesia, the effect on perioperative sevoflurane requirement after a single, presurgical caudal block with either tramadol or morphine in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. Our study was also designed to evaluate the preemptive analgesic efficacy of morphine administered caudally in children. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into three groups to receive 2 mg.kg-1 tramadol (group T, preemptive group) or morphine sulphate 0.03 mg.kg-1 (group M, preemptive group). The patients in control group (group C, postincisional group) received morphine sulphate 0.03 mg.kg-1 at the end of surgery, caudally. Cardiorespiratory data, sedation and pain were recorded for 24 h following recovery from anaesthesia. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups in baseline blood pressure or heart rate; or duration of anaesthesia, surgery. The inhaled sevoflurane concentration was significantly lower in group M and group T than in the control group. The quality and duration of postoperative pain relief did not differ between the three groups. There were no intergroup differences in postoperative nausea, vomiting, or other complications. CONCLUSION: Caudal tramadol (2 mg.kg-1) provided reliable postoperative analgesia similar to caudal morphine (0.03 mg.kg-1) in quality and duration of pain relief in our study children who were undergoing herniorrhaphy. We also concluded that presurgical caudal morphine or tramadol reduced perioperative sevoflurane requirements and either presurgical or postsurgical caudal morphine did not make any difference to postoperative analgesia.     

A comparison between local anaesthetic dorsal nerve block and caudal bupivacaine with ketamine for paediatric circumcision

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been shown to prolong analgesia produced by caudal local anaesthetic block and is now in common use. This study compares caudal block using bupivacaine/ketamine with dorsal nerve block of the penis. METHODS: Sixty boys undergoing elective circumcision were given either 0.5 ml x kg-1 of bupivacaine 0.15% with ketamine 0.5 mg x kg-1 (n = 30) or dorsal nerve block of the penis with bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 30) as a supplement to general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain was assessed by parents using a modified objective pain score, and the time taken to first requirement of analgesia was recorded. Motor weakness, time to first micturition, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), eating habits, sleep disturbance and behaviour were also assessed. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in time to first requirement for analgesia or number of doses of paracetamol given in the first 24 h. Almost half the boys in the caudal group had motor weakness, and there was a significant increase in time to first micturition in that group. There was no difference between the groups in PONV, eating, sleeping or behavioural disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal anaesthesia with bupivacaine/ketamine does not confer any advantage over a dorsal nerve block with the doses used in this study. Because of the higher incidence of side-effects and technique failure in the caudal group, dorsal nerve block is perhaps the preferred technique.     

Caudal block in children: analgesia and respiratory effect of the combination bupivacaine-fentanyl]

A study of the duration of analgesia and of the respiratory response to hypercapnia was carried out in 14 children who had had a caudal block with either bupivacaine alone (group B) or combined with fentanyl (Group B+F). Fourteen ASA I or II 5 to 10-year-old children undergoing genital and urinary surgery were included. They were not premedicated. At first, general anaesthesia was induced with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Thereafter, caudal anaesthesia was then carried out with 1 ml.kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1 in 200,000. Group B+F patients were also given 1 microgram.kg-1 of fentanyl in 1 ml of normal saline, and those in Group B 1 ml of normal saline. The level of sensory loss on leaving the operating theatre as well as the duration of motor paralysis were monitored. Postoperative pain was scored with Hannalah and Broadman's score (0 to 10) 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after the caudal block. Respiratory rate (fR), tidal volume (VT) and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed 10 min before induction of general anaesthesia, and 30, 60 and 120 min after the caudal anaesthesia. Petco2 was also measured before induction of general anaesthesia, and 60 and 120 min after caudal anaesthesia; at the same times, the ventilatory response to hypercapnia was assessed using Read's method with a Douglas bag containing 7% CO2 and 93% O2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sevoflurane provides better recovery than propofol plus fentanyl in anaesthesia for day-care surgery

To compare ease of maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and propofol plus fentanyl in day-care anaesthesia, 60 outpatients undergoing elective surgery of up to 3 h duration were randomized to receive sevoflurane or propofol as their primary anaesthetic. Induction was always carried out with propofol, but a fentanyl bolus 5 microg kg-1 was added in the propofol group. Anaesthesia was supplemented with up to 70% N2O. Significantly shorter times to extubation (10.03 min +/- 3.2 SD vs. 17.2 +/- 7.3; P < 0.001) and emergence (10.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.8 +/- 6.4; P < 0.001) were observed in the sevoflurane group. Patients treated with sevoflurane felt less confused, showed better performances in the digit symbol substitution test and achieved higher modified Aldrete scores sooner in the post-operative course. Maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane produces faster emergence and recovery than propofol plus fentanyl after anaesthesia of short to intermediate duration.     

Analgesic efficacy and safety of a caudal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in children

The analgesic efficacy and safety of a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture was investigated in this prospective, controlled, triple-blinded study of 34 children, aged 1-11 yr and of ASA physical status I-II undergoing urological surgery. After induction of anaesthesia and before surgery, the children were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of 1.0 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and either fentanyl 1.0 microgram.kg-1 in 1.0 ml of normal saline or 1.0 ml of normal saline. After completion of surgery, patients were assessed in the recovery room for six hours from the time of the caudal injection and for a further 18 hr on the ward. While in the recovery room arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored continuously and recorded hourly together with end-tidal carbon dioxide, pain and sedation scores. Other complications were also recorded. While on the ward, pain and sedation scores, respiratory rate and side effects were recorded every two hours. Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous morphine. Analgesic requirements were recorded for the 24-hr study period. Pain and sedation scores did not differ between groups. Respiratory depression or hypoxia did not occur. The incidences of other side effects did not differ. There were no differences in the numbers of patients requiring morphine within eight hours, the time to first morphine administration or the total morphine requirements. We conclude that a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture with epinephrine administered prior to surgery, while safe, offers no advantage over an injection of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine for paediatric urological surgery.     

Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.375% bupivacaine in paediatric patients

We have determined the effectiveness and degree of motor block produced by the new local anaesthetic, ropivacaine, when used for caudal anaesthesia in children. We studied 60 children, aged 3-6 yr, ASA I, allocated randomly in a double-blind manner, to receive one of two local anaesthetics: 0.375% ropivacaine 1.0 ml kg-1 or 0.375% bupivacaine 1.0 ml kg-1. Patients were anaesthetized with continuous infusion of propofol 200 micrograms kg-1 min-1. The lungs were ventilated with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Heart rate and arterial pressure were measured every 5 min after administration of local anaesthetic until discharge from the recovery room. The extent of motor block in the recovery room was scored as 1-3. Adverse events and time to first analgesic requirements were recorded. Patients in the two groups did not differ in age, weight or height. There were no differences in heart rate or arterial pressure between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. The degree of motor block was significantly different between the two groups. The ropivacaine group showed a shorter duration of motor block than the bupivacaine group (P < 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was required at a mean time of 5 (SD 3.2) h in the ropivacaine group compared with 5 (2.8) h in the bupivacaine group. These findings suggest that caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine in paediatric patients is effective and produces less motor block in the postoperative period.      

Ropivacaine 0.25% compared with bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route.

We compared in a randomized double-blind study, the postoperative analgesia and degree of motor block produced by the new local anaesthetic ropivacaine, with bupivacaine, for caudal anaesthesia in children. Eighty children, 2-5-years-old, ASA I, received one of two local anaesthetics; either ropivacaine 0.25% (1.0 ml x kg(-1)) or bupivacaine 0.25% (1.0 ml x kg(-1)). They were sedated with a continuous infusion of propofol (200 microg x kg(-1) min(-1). The lungs were ventilated with a mixture of 50% nitrous oxide with oxygen. 60 min after local anaesthetic injection, and every 60 min, the extent of the motor block in the recovery room was scored as 1-3, according to a modified Bromage scale. Adverse events and the time to the first analgesic requirement were reported. Patients in the two groups did not differ with respect to age, weight and height. There were no differences in heart rate and arterial pressure between the two groups(P>0.05). No adverse events were observed. The ropivacaine group showed a shorter duration of motor block than the bupivacaine group (P<0.05). The first postoperative analgesic requirement was a mean (sd) of 5 h+/-4.32 after the operation in the ropivacaine group and 5 h+/-3.81 for the bupivacaine group. These findings suggest that caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine 0.25% in paediatric patients can be effective, with less motor blockade in the postoperative period.     

Comparison of ropivacaine with bupivacaine for paediatric caudal block

In a double-blind, multicentre study 245 children aged 1-10 yr undergoing elective minor surgery as inpatients were randomly allocated to receive a single caudal extradural injection of 1 ml kg-1 of either 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine after induction of light general anaesthesia. The groups were comparable for age, weight, vital signs and duration of surgery. The onset time was similar for ropivacaine and bupivacaine (9.7 vs 10.4 min). Further analgesia was not required in 40% of children. The mean time to first analgesia in the remainder was 233 min in the bupivacaine group and 271 min in the ropivacaine group. No motor block was measurable in either group. Ropivacaine 2 mg kg-1 was as effective as bupivacaine 2.5 mg kg-1 for caudal analgesia in children.      

Analgesic effect of clonidine added to bupivacaine 0.125% in paediatric caudal blockade

BACKGROUND: Caudals are a common method of providing pain relief in children undergoing surgery. Clonidine, an alpha(2) agonist, exhibits significant analgesic properties. The current investigation sought to determine whether caudal clonidine added to caudal bupivacaine would decrease pain in paediatric patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Thirty-six children undergoing elective surgery were studied. Following anaesthetic induction, a caudal was placed (1 mg.kg(-1) bupivacaine 0.125%) with an equal volume of either clonidine (2 microg.kg(-1)) or saline. Perioperative analgesic requirements in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) and at home following hospital discharge, and parental pain scores were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic, haemodynamic, or pain score differences between the groups. There was no difference in analgesic duration between groups. There were significantly more children who vomited during the first 24 postoperative hours in the clonidine group than in the saline group (eight in clonidine, two in saline; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We do not recommend adding clonidine (2 microg.kg(-1)) to a bupivacaine (0.125%) caudal block in children undergoing surgery.     

The addition of clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 does not enhance the postoperative analgesia of a caudal block using 0.125% bupivacaine and epinephrine 1:200,000 in children: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of 0.125% bupivacaine and epinephrine 1:200,000 with and without clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 for 'single shot' pediatric caudal analgesia. METHODS: Thirty ASA I and II children, ages 2-8 years, undergoing outpatient surgical procedures below the umbilicus received 1 ml.kg-1 0.125% bupivacaine with fresh epinephrine 1:200,000 and clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 (group-C) or 1 ml.kg-1 0.125 % bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200 000 (group-NC). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic (induction with 67% N2O in O2 and sevoflurane followed by isoflurane maintenance). Primary outcome measures were time to first rescue analgesic and number of patients requiring rescue analgesic at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after caudal placement. Secondary outcome measures included: extubation times, Objective Pain Scale (OPS) scores, sedation scores, time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), discharge time, number of analgesic doses given in 24 h following caudal blockade, and adverse effects (vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia). RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics, investigated parameters, or adverse effects between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the addition of clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 to 0.125% bupivacaine with fresh epinephrine 1:200,000 for caudal analgesia did not significantly delay the time to first rescue analgesic or decrease the overall need for rescue analgesics in children 2-8 years undergoing surgical procedures below the umbilicus.     

Comparison of Haemodynamic Effects of Morphine and Fentanyl in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

The haemodynamic effects of morphine (2.5 mg kg-1) and fentanyl (16.7 and 25 micrograms kg-1) were compared in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Morphine or fentanyl in combination with pancuronium, nitrous oxide and a small dose of thiopentone produced some deterioration of myocardial performance. Both analgesics failed to block haemodynamic responses to noxious stimulation including tracheal intubation and sternotomy. Heart rate increased following tracheal intubation and systemic vascular resistance increased after sternotomy. However, the larger dose of fentanyl (25 micrograms kg-1) was accompanied by the smallest haemodynamic changes. Supplementary anaesthetic agents were often required to maintain haemodynamic stability during sternotomy. It is suggested here that larger doses of fentanyl, or the addition of other intravenous or inhalation anaesthetics might be employed for patients with severe coronary artery disease and good left ventricular function. On the other hand, in patients with poor left ventricular function, the myocardial depressant properties of thiopentone and nitrous oxide may be detrimental.     

Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolongs the duration of surgical analgesia after single shot caudal block in children

Caudal anaesthesia is indicated for surgical procedures lasting less than 90 min. Fentanyl and clonidine are known to prolong postoperative caudal analgesia, but there are no data on their effect on duration of surgical analgesia. We evaluated if the addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolonged the duration of surgical analgesia after single shot caudal block in children in a randomized, double-blind study. We studied 64 children, aged 6-108 months, undergoing bilateral correction of vesicoureteral reflux which was expected to last more than 90 min. Patients were allocated to one of four groups: group O received 1 ml kg-1 of a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 1% lidocaine in equal parts; group F received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1; group C received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to clonidine 1.5 micrograms kg-1; and group C + F received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to fentanyl 0.5 microgram kg-1 and clonidine 0.75 microgram kg-1. Single shot caudal block was sufficient in only 57% of children in group O compared with 93% in groups C and F and 86% in group C + F (P = 0.035). Global assessment of anaesthesia, defined as the time from caudal injection to the first administration of analgesic (either during or after surgery), was significantly longer in the three groups of children who received additives compared with local anaesthetics alone (P = 0.035), but there were no differences between the three additive groups. Vomiting was observed only in children who received fentanyl. Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolonged the duration of surgical analgesia of caudal block, allowing single shot caudal anaesthesia to be recommended for surgery lasting 90-150 minutes. Clonidine had some advantages over fentanyl as it did not produce clinically significant side effects.