Grass pollen immunotherapy for seasonal rhinitis and asthma: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen immunotherapy significantly reduces hay fever symptoms and medication requirements. Effects on seasonal asthma are less clear, and concerns over safety persist. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the effects of grass pollen immunotherapy on symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and quality of life in seasonal rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: Forty-four patients with severe summer hay fever (of whom 36 reported seasonal chest symptoms and 28 had seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. After symptom monitoring for one summer, participants received injections of a depot grass pollen vaccine (n = 22) or matched placebo injections (n = 22) in a rapid updosing cluster regimen for 4 weeks, followed by monthly injections for 2 years. Outcome measures included hay fever symptoms and medication use, health-related quality of life, and measurements of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness. RESULTS: Significant reductions were observed in the immunotherapy group compared with the placebo group in hay fever symptoms (49%, 15%; P =.01), medication scores (80%, 18%; P =.007), and seasonal chest symptoms (90%, 11%; P <.05). Impairment of overall quality of life (mean score of 7 domains) during the pollen season was less in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group (median difference [95% CI], 0.8 [0.18-1.5]; P =.02). During the pollen season there was no change in airway methacholine PC(20) (provocation concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in the immunotherapy-treated group (P =.5), compared with an almost 3 doubling-dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P =.01, between-group difference). There were no significant local or systemic side effects during the study. CONCLUSION: Grass pollen immunotherapy improves quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis and reduces seasonal asthma symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.     

Nasal beclomethasone prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that induction of a nasal allergic reaction can lead to an increase in bronchial responsiveness (BR). To assess the clinical relevance of these experimental changes to chronic asthma, we sought to determine the effect of nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (Bdp) on BR in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. Eighteen subjects with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma during the fall pollen season with positive skin tests to short ragweed and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were assigned to receive either nasal Bdp (336 micrograms/day) or placebo for the entire ragweed season. Patients recorded daily nasal and chest symptoms, nasal blockage index, oral peak expiratory flow rates, and supplemental medication use. BR to methacholine was measured during the baseline period and 6 weeks into the ragweed season. Although the Bdp group did have a significant improvement in nasal blockage index, there was no improvement in daily asthma symptom scores, oral peak expiratory flow, or asthma medication use. However, subjects treated with Bdp were protected from the increase in BR seen in the placebo group (geometric mean PC20 placebo group: baseline = 0.70, week 6 = 0.29; Bdp group: baseline = 0.80, week 6 = 0.93; intergroup difference, p = 0.022). We conclude that nasal corticosteroid therapy can prevent the increase in BR associated with seasonal pollen exposure in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.     

Treatment of ragweed hay fever with intranasally administered disodium cromoglycate*

In a double-blind study the therapeutic effect of a 4% disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) nasal solution was evaluated in thirty-nine patients with acute symptoms of ragweed hay fever. Patients were randomly assigned to the DSCG or placebo group as they presented with allergic rhinitis. Overall, the DSCG was not more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms of rhinitis or in decreasing the need for concomitant antihistamines or corticosteroids. Among patients with the highest pretreatment serum ragweed-specific IgE (RW IgE) levels, drug-treated patients had some reduction in symptoms as compared to their placebo controls during the peak of the ragweed pollen season. DSCG treatment did not influence the usual seasonal rise in RW IgE. Side effects from both the active and placebo aerosols were frequent but mild. We conclude that DSCG nasal solution used for the treatment of seasonal ragweed allergic rhinitis is relatively ineffective.     

Intranasal and inhaled fluticasone propionate for pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that nasal treatment might influence lower airway symptoms and function in patients with comorbid rhinitis and asthma. We investigated the effect of intranasal, inhaled corticosteroid or the combination of both in patients with both pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: A total of 262 patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP) 200 microg o.d., inhaled fluticasone propionate (IHFP) 250 microg b.i.d., their combination, or intranasal or inhaled placebo, in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. Treatment was started 2 weeks prior to the pollen season and patients recorded their nasal and bronchial symptoms twice daily. Before and after 4 and 6 weeks' treatment, the patients were assessed for lung function, methacholine responsiveness, and induced sputum cell counts. RESULTS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate significantly increased the percentages of patients reporting no nasal blockage, sneezing, or rhinorrhoea during the pollen season, compared with IHFP or intranasal or inhaled placebo. In contrast, only IHFP significantly improved morning peak-flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and methacholine PD20, and the seasonal increase in the sputum eosinophils and methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma, the combination of intranasal and IHFP is needed to control the seasonal increase in nasal and asthmatic symptoms.     

Serum IgE levels and the use of sodium cromoglycate (BP) in hay fever: a study of forty-six patients from a single general practice

In a double blind trial of nasal spray of sodium cromoglycate (DSCG) for hay fever, fifteen of twenty-three patients taking the drug were helped, compared with thirteen of twenty-three receiving placebo—a statistically insignificant difference. Serum levels of IgE were raised in thirty-eight of forty-four patients examined. There was no significant difference between preseasonal and seasonal serum IgE levels in either of the DSCG or the placebo group. Serum IgE levels were significantly higher in the patients showing peripheral blood or nasal secretion eosinophilia during the hay fever season. There was no significant difference in the frequency of nasal secretion eosinophilia between those taking DSCG and those taking placebo. It is concluded that DSCG spray does not affect serum IgE levels or eosinophilia of either peripheral blood or nasal secretions under the conditions applying in this trial. Neither was DSCG significantly better than placebo in controlling symptoms.     

Mechanism of topical glucocorticoid treatment of hay fever: IL-5 and eosinophil activation during natural allergen exposure are suppressed, but IL-4, IL-6, and IgE antibody production are unaffected

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is traditionally defined as an IgE- and mast cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Allergen challenge models suggest that cytokines and eosinophil mediators may also play roles. However, the causal relationship among inflammatory cells, their products, and patients' symptoms during natural allergen exposure has not been established. OBJECTIVE: We sought to elucidate the mechanisms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and the beneficial effects of topical glucocorticoids. METHODS: Thirty patients with ragweed-induced hay fever and a strongly positive serologic test response for ragweed IgE antibody received budesonide nasal spray or placebo in a randomized, parallel, double-blind study. Nasal wash fluids and sera were collected before and during the hay fever season. The levels of inflammatory mediators and allergen-specific immunoglobulins were measured by immunoassay. The activation markers on blood eosinophils were quantitated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Compared with placebo-treated patients, budesonide-treated patients had strikingly reduced symptoms. In the placebo group, nasal symptoms correlated with nasal lavage fluid eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and IL-5 levels. At the season peak, the budesonide-treated group had significantly lower nasal fluid eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, IL-5, and soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 levels. In the treated group eosinophil expression of CD11b was suppressed at the season peak. In contrast, levels of IL-4 and IL-6 in nasal fluid and the seasonal increases in serum ragweed-specific IgE and nasal fluid IgA antibodies did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Eosinophilic inflammation plays a critical role in seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms. One of the therapeutic effects of glucocorticoids is to suppress this inflammation.     

Effect of cetirizine on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma

Although H1 antihistamine compounds (H1) are highly effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR), their role in the treatment of asthma is still controversial. Because a strong association between AR and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) has been reported, this study was designed to assess the effect of a new H1 anti histamine, cetirizine (C), on nonspecific BHR in patients with AR. Twelve patients were included in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. All patients had positive skin tests for common allergens and showed BHR to inhaled methacholine after specific nasal allergenic challenge. After a washout period of 1 week to ensure the stability of the BHR, the patients received, by crossover randomization, C 10 mg daily or placebo (P) for 2 weeks. After each treatment period, BHR and nasal blocking index (NBI) were measured 1 and 6 h after nasal challenge. Bronchial responsiveness was expressed as methacholine PD20, the provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1. Measurements were then performed after 2 weeks of C and after 2 weeks of P. Baseline values of PD20 (median) measured before challenge showed no difference after cetirizine or after placebo (1.36 mg). Results 1 h after allergen did not show significant differences between C (methacholine PD20=0.522 mg) and placebo (methacholine PD20=0.455 mg). By contrast, 6 h after challenge, methacholine PD20 was 0.918 mg for C and 0.483 mg for P (P=0.042). Similarly, NBI showed no change between C and P 1 h after challenge, whereas the difference was significant 6 h after challenge (P=0.011 ). These data demonstrate a protective nasal effect of C against BHR measured 6 h after nasal allergen challenge in patients with AR. They suggest that C may be useful in patients with asthma associated with AR.     

Effect of seasonal exposure to pollen on specific bronchial sensitivity in allergic patients

Bronchial provocation tests with aerosol of birch extract were performed before and after pollen season in 11 sensitized subjects. Changes of metacholine bronchial responsiveness and serum-specific IgE level were also assessed. In five patients who did not take steroids to control their symptoms, both early and late asthmatic responses to inhaled allergen were enhanced after season, whereas IgE serum level, but not methacholine sensitivity, was significantly increased. In six patients who needed steroids, neither responses to allergen nor IgE serum level and methacholine sensitivity were significantly changed after season. For the whole group, the increase in immediate bronchial sensitivity to allergen was positively correlated with the increase in specific IgE antibodies. We conclude that seasonal exposure to pollen has, in sensitized patients, a priming effect on bronchial mucosa that may be blunted by steroid treatment. The increased production of specific IgE antibodies appears to be an important mechanism for this priming effect.     

Challenge tests and specific IgE in hay fever sufferers

The relationship between challenge tests, specific IgE and seasonal effects in hay fever sufferers was studied. There were significant relationships between nasal challenge, conjunctival challenge and skin-prick test threshold doses, although the skin and conjunctiva tended to be less sensitive than the nose. A seasonal effect was apparent on nasal challenge, but not conjunctival challenge or skin-prick testing, with lower threshold doses recorded after the pollen season than in midwinter. There was a significant relationship between specific IgE and nasal challenge, but not conjunctival or skin-prick test threshold doses.     

Immunotherapy in Hay Fever with Two Major Allergens 19, 25 and Partially Purified Extract of Timothy Grass Pollen

Grass pollen hay fever patients were hyposensitized in a prospective 3-year double blind study with two timothy extracts. Group WPA (20 patients) was treated with partially purified extract = whole pollen allergens (WPA) (Alutard®SQ) and group PPA (20 patients) was treated with a purified pollen allergen (PPA) = two isolated major allergens, Ag19 and Ag25. Both aluminiumhydroxide adsorbed extracts were biologically standardized. Clinical results from the first season have been recently published and WPA showed significantly fewer symptoms (P= 0.001) than PPA. Corresponding preseasonal and seasonal in vitro results are presented here. Serum total IgE, specific IgE versus total and individual allergens of timothy pollen and allergen-specific IgG showed a rapid increase in both groups until the season but showed no further increase or decrease during the season. Specific IgE was shown to correlate to specific IgG during hyposensitization. Group WPA, with fewer symptoms in grass pollen season than group PPA showed a significantly higher increase of specific IgG and IgE than group PPA, but individual symptom scores were not correlated to specific IgG or IgE, or their ratio. Specific IgE and IgG increases were not correlated to dosage. Surprisingly, almost all females were low-responders to specific IgG and IgE though they had equal symptom scores, dosage, and side effects as males, while the characteristics of high-responders to antibody were: youngest individuals and shortest duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis (CRIE) showed specific reaction to stimuli but no development of allergy against new timothy antigens. High response of IgE to Ag 19 in CRIE during initial hyposensitization seems suitable as marker for prospective evaluation of clinical effect in grass pollen hyposensitization. Nasal secretion was collected after methacholine provocation, and total IgE and specific IgE detected. There was no response to treatment, only a slight increase during the season. No decrease in nasal reactivity to methacholine was noted during one preseasonal hyposensitization.     

Changes in airway inflammation following nasal allergic challenge in patients with seasonal rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis could predispose to the development of chronic bronchial inflammation as observed in asthma. However, direct links between nasal inflammation, bronchial inflammation and airway responsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and without asthma are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyse the changes induced by allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season in airway responsiveness and bronchial inflammation of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Nine patients were evaluated after either grass pollens or placebo nasal challenge in a randomized cross-over double-blinded trial. Nasal parameters were recorded hourly and airway responsiveness was assessed by methacholine challenge. Cytological examinations and cytokine measurements were performed in nasal lavage and induced sputum. Eosinophil activation was investigated by eosinophil-cationic protein expression and secretion. RESULTS: Airway responsiveness was increased after allergic nasal challenge. Total eosinophils and eosinophils expressing eosinophil-cationic protein were increased in induced sputum after allergic nasal challenge. Both eosinophil number and eosinophil-cationic protein concentration in induced sputum were correlated to methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophils participate to the bronchial inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis following allergic nasal challenge outside the pollen season and might explain changes in airway responsiveness.     

Non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness in mono-sensitive Sicilian patients with allergic rhinitis. Its relationship to total serum IgE levels and blood eosinophils during and out of the pollen season

Background Initial attempts to evaluate the association between allergic rhinitis and nonspecific bronchial responsiveness has produced conflicting results. In fact, some studies showed a strong correlation and other failed to find an association. However, little is known about the effect of natural specific allergen exposure on the bronchial reactivity of mono-sensitive patients with rhinitis in the southern Mediterranean area, in relation to skin reactivity to allergens, total serum IgE levels and blood eosinophiis. Objectives The significance of the association between allergic rhinitis, and abnormal airway responsiveness with regard to the pathogenesis of asthma is unclear. For this reason, we have studied non-specific bronchiai hyperreactivity. in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, with reference to the responsible allergen. The aim of the study was to correlate the responsiveness to bronchoprovocation with methacholine in subjects a with allergic rhinitis during and out of the pollen season with total serum IgE and blood eosinophils. Methods Fourty-nine non-smoking patients with clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and mono-sensitive skinprick tests to pollen allergens were enrolled in the study. Twenty patients suffered from seasonal rhinitis to Parietaria pollen. 15 patients to Gramineae pollen and 14 patients to Olea pollen. In all patients lung function measurements (assessed as response to methacholine). tolal serum IgE and blood eosinophii counts were measured during and out of the pollen season. Results During pollen season. 16 out of 49 rhinitis patients demonstrated values of bronchial responsiveness measured as response to inhaled metbacholine in the asthmatic range whereas out of the pollen season only eight patients were in the asthmatic range. By analysing the results with reference to the responsible allergen, during the pollen season 5 out of 16 patients were Parietaria -sensitive and out of the pollen season seven out of eight patients. Finally, in Parietaria -sensitive rhinitis bronchial responsiveness signifi-cantly correlated, during and out of the pollen season, with total serum IgE and with blood eosinophil counts. Conclusions Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that Parietaria is more important than Olea and Gramineae as a risk for developing non- specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. On the whole, present observations provide further evidence that there is an interrelationship of allergen kind, total serum IgE. eosinophil and bronchial hyperressponsiveness suggesting that they may play a role in the development of bronchial asthma in rhinitis patients.     

Effect of azelastine on the seasonal increase in non-specific bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in pollen allergic patients. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, crossover study

Azelastine, a phthalazinone derivative, is a new potent, long acting, orally active anti-allergic compound with particularly strong H1-histamine receptor antagonistic effects which has been proven to possess in vitro and in vivo a number of anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether azelastine would be able to prevent and/or reverse the seasonal increase in non-specific bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in pollen allergic patients. Twelve atopic patients (5 males, mean age 31 years), skin positive exclusively to grass and/or Parietaria pollen extract, with rhinitis and mild asthma occurring in the spring for at least two years previously, were studied. After a 2 week run-in period, oral azelastine, 4 mg twice daily, or placebo, was given for 2 weeks from the start of the pollen season, according to a randomized, double-blind design. After 2 weeks, the treatments were crossed over. During both the run-in and study periods, patients recorded rhinitis and asthma symptoms, additional antihistamine and bronchodilator drugs taken and peak expiratory flow measurements. A methacholine inhalation test was carried out on four occasions in each patient: before the run-in period, before the start of the treatment, and at the end of the two 2 week treatment periods. Azelastine significantly reduced rhinitis symptoms and the need for antihistamine drugs, whereas asthmatic symptoms, use of bronchodilator drugs, peak flow recordings and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine were unaffected by the treatment. Compliance level and adverse side-effects were not significantly different between active treatment and placebo. In the final subjective evaluation of the two treatments, eight out of 12 patients preferred azelastine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pollen immunotherapy reduces the development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis (the PAT-study)

BACKGROUND: Children with allergic rhinitis are likely to develop asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether specific immunotherapy can prevent the development of asthma and reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: From 6 pediatric allergy centers, 205 children aged 6 to 14 years (mean age, 10.7 years) with grass and/or birch pollen allergy but without any other clinically important allergy were randomized either to receive specific immunotherapy for 3 years or to an open control group. All subjects had moderate to severe hay fever symptoms, but at inclusion none reported asthma with need of daily treatment. Symptomatic treatment was limited to loratadine, levocabastine, sodium cromoglycate, and nasal budesonide. Asthma was evaluated clinically and by peak flow. Methacholine bronchial provocation tests were carried out during the season(s) and during the winter. RESULTS: Before the start of immunotherapy, 20% of the children had mild asthma symptoms during the pollen season(s). Among those without asthma, the actively treated children had significantly fewer asthma symptoms after 3 years as evaluated by clinical diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.52; P <.05). Methacholine bronchial provocation test results improved significant in the active group (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy can reduce the development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis.     

Use of glutaraldehyde-modified timothy grass pollen extract in nasal hyposensitisation treatment of hay fever.

12 patients suffering from grass pollen hay fever were treated for 14 weeks pre- and co-seasonally by intranasal self-administration of an aqueous solution of a glutaraldehyde-treated timothy grass pollen allergen. These patients had a statistically significant decrease in nasal symptom scores during the grass pollen peak period and in nasal challenge end-point titre after the season compared to placebo-treated patients. No significant effect was seen on the eye symptoms. 1 patient withdrew from the trial as a consequence of too strong local nasal reactions during treatment. Most other patients treated with active material reported mild local reactions during the first minutes after administration of the nasal spray. In the actively treated group a significant increase in serum and nasal secretion of grass pollen specific IgE, IgG and IgA antibodies was obtained during the treatment. In contrast, in the placebo group a significant increase in IgE antibody levels in serum and secretion occurred during the pollen season. The reduction in symptoms and increase in antibody production together with the simplicity of the procedure makes this approach to immunotherapy attractive.     

Treatment of hay fever with loratadine - a new non-sedating antihistamine

The efficacy and safety of loratadine, a new orally active specific H1-receptor blocking antihistamine with poor penetration into the CNS, was evaluated in a double blind comparative study. One hundred and seven hay fever patients, sensitive to birch pollen, were randomized into three parallel groups receiving loratadine 40 mg once daily, clemastine 1 mg twice daily, or placebo during the birch pollen season. Both active treatments showed reduction of symptoms in comparison with placebo, but the results were more pronounced with loratadine treatment, which significantly reduced the overall allergic condition as well as all separate allergic rhino-conjunctivitis symptoms except nasal stuffiness. Compared with placebo the sedation rate was significantly higher with clemastine treatment (P less than 0.05) but not with loratadine. Loratadine was thus concluded to be efficacious in hay fever treatment with a sedation rate not differing from placebo.     

Effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchial inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that patients with allergic rhinitis have lower airway inflammation and a higher prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) regardless of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers of lower airway inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) before and during pollen season and the effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations in these parameters. METHODS: Thirty-two nonasthmatic children with SAR in response to grass and/or weed pollens were recruited and separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with triamcinolone acetonide (220 microg once daily) for 6 weeks, and group 2 received no intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine [concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20)], eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and serum were measured before and during grass pollen season. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study. During the pollen season, methacholine PC20 significantly decreased in both groups when compared with the corresponding preseasonal values (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). The mean percentage of sputum eosinophils increased significantly during the pollen season compared with preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 (12.7% +/- 2.1% vs 16.5% +/- 2.1%, P = .007, and 11.0% +/- 2.0% vs 20.2% +/- 1.4%, P = .003, respectively). Median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] sputum ECP levels were significantly higher during the pollen season when compared with the preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 [7.5 microg/L (3.5-36.0 microg/L) vs 35.5 microg/L (13.0-71.7 microg/L), P = .04, and 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L) vs 69.0 microg/L (39.0-195.0 microg/L), P = .003, respectively], as were the serum ECP levels [6.0 microg/L (2.0-13.0 microg/L) vs 19.0 microg/L (14.0-43.5 microg/L), P = .004, and 6.0 microg/L (3.0-7.0 microg/L) vs 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L), P = .001, respectively]. Although the mean number of eosinophils in blood increased during the pollen season in both groups, it was only significant in group 2 (70.0 +/- 20.0 vs 161.6 +/- 29.0, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic nasal corticosteroid treatment provides significant reduction of nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use, there is no significant prevention in the seasonal increase of bronchial inflammation and methacholine BHR.     

Bronchial challenge responses in asthmatic patients sensitized to Artemisia spp. pollen

To characterize the patients whose asthma may be caused by Artemisia pollen extracts, we studied the bronchoprovocation test with Korean Artemisia pollen extracts (1:20 w/v), methacholine bronchial challenge test and wormwood-RAST in 32 asthmatic patients sensitized to Artemisia pollen. Twenty-six(81%) developed a 15% or greater decrease in FEVI after the inhalation of Artemisia pollen extracts and 13 patients showed early responses, 8 dual, and 5 late only. Thirteen(50%) out of 26 positive responders complained of seasonal aggravation of their asthmatic symptoms. Seven(53.8%) of the 13 seasonal type patients, 10(76.9%) of the 13 perennial type and 5(100%) of the 5 negative responders showed concurrent positive responses in the house dust bronchoprovocation test. The bronchial responsiveness to allergen(PD15) was more dependent upon the specific IgE level(bound radioactivity on wormwood-RAST) and multiple regression analysis revealed that the specific IgE level and methacholine PC20 may be contributory to allergen PD15. These results suggested that specific IgE to Artemisia pollen appears to be the major contributor to susceptibility to Artemisia bronchial challenges and this pollen may be considered as one of the important allergenic etiologies of atopic asthma in this country.     

Randomized controlled trial of high-dose sublingual immunotherapy to treat seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis is common and troublesome. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proposed as an alternative to injection immunotherapy and might offer some advantages if it were effective and practical in a community setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and side-effect profile of SLIT in patients with summer hay fever uncontrolled on current standard medication. To assess the feasibility of delivering SLIT in a United Kingdom general practice setting. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 186 patients with severe summer hay fever identified from 16 United Kingdom general practices. After a baseline year to ensure balanced groups, subjects were randomized, and SLIT was given for 1 or 2 years and compared with placebo. The principal outcome measure was symptoms as recorded on diary cards. Secondary criteria were skin and conjunctival reactivity, allergen-specific IgE and IgG 4 , and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six subjects completed the study. After 1 year, no significant differences were found between actively treated subjects and the placebo group. After the second year of therapy, subjects who had received 2 years treatment were 6.8 times more likely to show a reduction in nose running (P <.001) and 2.4 times more likely to have reduced sneezing (P <.05) compared with subjects in the placebo group. Benefits for nasal blockage were found at the peak pollen season and were similar in both actively treated groups. CONCLUSION: Sublingual immunotherapy can be given successfully and safely in the community. High-dose SLIT has beneficial effects on nasal symptoms during the peak pollen season in patients with severe seasonal allergic rhinitis. At least 2 years of treatment with SLIT is required to show a benefit.     

Dissimilarity between seasonal changes in airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: relation to induced sputum

BACKGROUND: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. METHODS: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC(20)) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a decrease in PC(20) methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC(20) from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC(20) AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22-2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55- 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC(20) methacholine and log PC(20) AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC(20) methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC(20) AMP (rho = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC(20) methacholine or seasonal changes in PC(20) methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (rho = -0.59, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC(20) AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC(20) methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.