Daclizumab is associated with decreased rejection and improved patient survival in renal transplant recipients

The present study investigated the safety of induction therapy with daclizumab (compared with no induction treatment), in adult renal transplant patients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database between January 1, 1998 and July 27, 2003. Patients who were discharged from the hospital on mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or sirolimus were divided into two groups: induction treatment with daclizumab (n = 8203) and no induction treatment (n = 25,368). Patient survival, death due to infection and death due to malignancy were evaluated at 1 and 3 yr post-transplantation. Rejection and graft survival were also examined. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to evaluate outcomes. No significant differences were found between patients treated with daclizumab compared with patients who received no induction therapy for death due to infection or malignancy at 1 and 3 yr post-transplantation. Patients treated with daclizumab (compared with no induction treatment) had statistically significantly better survival rates at 1 (96.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.003) and 3 yr (92.4% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.004) although absolute differences were minimal. This was confirmed in the multivariable Cox regression analysis for patient death at 1 (HR = 0.77, p < 0.001) and 3 yr (HR = 0.83, p = 0.001) post-transplantation. Patients treated with daclizumab compared to no induction had lower rejection rates at 1 (13.1% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001) and 3 yr post-transplantation (16.7% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Cox regression confirmed a decreased risk for rejection at 1 (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001) and 3 yr (HR = 0.75, p < 0.001). Treatment with daclizumab was associated with reduced risk for graft loss at 1 (HR = 0.82, p < 0.001) and 3 years (HR = 0.86, p < 0.001). In conclusion, daclizumab was associated with a significantly reduced risk for rejection and graft loss compared with no induction treatment, and improved patient survival. In addition, daclizumab was not associated with an increase in risk of death due to infection or malignancy, when compared with no induction therapy. These findings demonstrate the short and long-term safety and efficacy of daclizumab in patients transplanted between January 1998 and July 2003.     

Daclizumab induction and maintenance steroid-free immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus to prevent acute rejection of hepatic allografts

Steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid-free regimen in a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml in the first month and 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra-operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C-positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C-negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post-transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.     

Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: a multicenter, prospective, pilot trial

This single-arm, open-label, pilot study was designed to assess the efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal interleukin (IL)-2Ralpha antibody, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and early corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients. Seventy-nine renal allograft recipients were treated with daclizumab (1 mg/kg; five doses starting on the day before transplant and then every two weeks), MMF (1 g b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/d), and low-dose prednisolone, which was withdrawn at day 150 after transplant. The rate of acute rejection was determined at 12 months. Lipid profile, oral glucose tolerance, and adverse events were monitored. Of the 76 patients eligible for analysis, eight (10.5%) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Ten (13.2%) experienced clinical and/or BPAR. Corticosteroids were withdrawn completely in 91% of patients at 12 months. Graft and patient survival were 97.5% and 98.7% respectively. Mean total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly lower at 12 months post-transplant than at baseline (201 +/- 47.5 vs. 190.8 +/- 43.6 mg/dL, p = 0.005 and 196.2 +/- 133.2 vs. 144.5 +/- 76.8 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively). Mean hemoglobin A1c levels did not differ between baseline (5.54%) and 12 months (5.48%). New-onset post-transplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 6.6% of the non-diabetic transplanted patients. The proportion of patients with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was 47% at 3 months and 39% at 12 months (p = NS). Daclizumab induction in combination with MMF, tacrolimus, and low-dose (followed by withdrawal) prednisolone appears to be effective and safe in patients receiving renal allografts. The regimen appears to be associated with a favorable cardiovascular profile.     

A case of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity appearing in a second renal transplantation patient

Oka K, Moriyama T, Imai E, Kyo M, Toki K, Tanaka T, Hori M, Kokado Y, Okuyama A, Takahara S. A case of tacrolimus toxicity appearing in a second renal transplantation patient. Clin Transplantation 2001: 15 (Supplement 5): 30–34. ©Munksgaard, 2001
We experienced a case of a second renal trans- plantation patient. With the use of cyclosporin, he lost his first graft because of chronic rejection; with the use of tacrolimus, his second graft suffered from drug nephrotox- icity. On his second renal transplantation, his graft function deteriorated and required haemodialysis with the use of tacrolimus. Repeated biopsies did not reveal the typical characteristics of acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and acute rejection. His tacrolimus trough level was not high during the clinical course; however, by reducing tacrolimus dosage, his graft function eventually recovered to mild renal dys- function. This observation was helpful for clinical diagnosis of the functional toxicity of tacrolimus. The case is interest- ing in considering the functional toxicity of tacrolimus and the difference between tacrolimus and cyclosporin in terms of immunosuppressive and nephrotoxic actions.     

A prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus and steroids with tacrolimus monotherapy in liver transplantation: the impact on recurrence of hepatitis C

The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to study the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy (TACRO) and compare it with our standard treatment of tacrolimus plus steroids (TACRO + ST) after liver transplant (LT). Furthermore, the impact of steroid-free immunosuppression on outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was analysed. Between 1998 and 2000, 60 patients (mean age: 57 years) were included in the study and randomized to receive TACRO (n = 28) or TACRO + ST (n = 32). Indication for LT was postnecrotic cirrhosis in all cases (58.3% were HCV-positive). Mean follow-up was 44 months. Survival, incidence of rejection, infection and side-effects were compared between the two groups. In patients with HCV infection, incidence and severity of acute hepatitis C, long-term outcome of recurrent hepatitis C and survival were studied in an intention-to-treat analysis or in the real group analysis (real-TACRO versus real-TACRO + ST). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years, tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, incidence of rejection infections and side-effects were similar. In patients with HCV, the incidence and severity of graft hepatitis C tended to be lower in TACRO (47%) compared with TACRO + ST (67%) (P = NS), and also in real-TACRO (42%) compared with real-TACRO + ST (61%) (P = NS). A poor outcome considered as evolution to cirrhosis at 3 years was observed in one (9%) living patient in real-TACRO and nine (45%) in real-TACRO + ST (P = 0.04). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 92% and 73% for real-TACRO and 78%, 61% and 51% for real TACRO + ST (P = 0.07). Steroid-free immunosuppression appears to be safe and efficacious. The main advantage of this regimen could be in HCV patients, as recurrence of hepatitis in the graft was less severe in the group of patients in whom steroids could be avoided completely.     

Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in African– American recipients of primary cadaver renal transplant

The ideal immunosuppressive treatment for African-American kidney transplant recipients has not been established. We performed a long-term prospective randomized trial comparing the results of tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporine (CSA) in the African-American population. Thirty-five African-American primary cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients were enrolled in the study. Group I (n = 14) received TAC and group II (n = 21) received CSA; mean follow up was 78 months. We found no difference in patient/graft survival rates between the groups. Twelve patients in the CSA group were converted to TAC, mostly because of hypercholesterolemia or as a rescue for an acute rejection episode. Significant lower creatinine and cholesterol levels were seen at 1 year post-transplant, but this difference lost significance at 3 and 5 years, possibly because of conversion of most patients from CSA to TAC. In conclusion, African-American recipients of primary CRTs can achieve excellent long-term results with TAC-based immunosuppression.     

Four-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine microemulsion or tacrolimus following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: This is a 4-yr follow-up of a trial using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The goal of this study was to evaluate a multidrug approach that would reduce both early and long-term morbidity related to immunosuppression while maintaining an acceptable freedom from rejection. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, intent to treat study designed to compare the primary endpoints of rejection and infection, and secondary endpoints of liver function, renal function, bone marrow function, cardiovascular risk factors, and the recurrence of hepatitis C. Ninety-nine consecutive patients with end stage liver disease who underwent OLT were randomized to receive either cyclosporine microemulsion (N) (50 patients) or tacrolimus (FK) (49 patients) starting on postoperative day 2, with MMF and an identical steroid taper begun preoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety of 99 patients (N 46, FK 44) completed the 4-yr follow-up. The overall 4-yr patient and graft survivals were 93 and 89%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 4-yr patient (N 96% vs. FK 90%, p = ns) or graft (N, 90% vs. FK, 88%, p = ns) survival between groups. The 4-yr rejection rate was not significantly different in either arm (N = 34%, FK = 24%; p = 0.28). There were no differences in infection rates in either arm. The patients with hepatitis C had no differences in the viral titers or Knodell biopsy scores between groups. However, in the hepatitis C subgroup (37 patients), the FK patients had a significantly lower rejection rate (p = 0.0097) and a significantly lower clinically recurrent hepatitis C rate (p = 0.05) than the N patients. No difference was seen in the percent of patients weaned off of steroids after 4 yr (N 51%, FK 49%). There were no differences in the incidences of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. When renal dysfunction was analyzed, a significant difference in the number of patients whose creatinine had increased twofold since transplant was seen (N 63%, FK 38%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Use of MMF induction and maintenance following OLT in conjunction with either N or FK and an identical steroid taper, resulted in an acceptable long-term incidence of rejection and infection, without an increase in long-term graft or patient morbidity.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug that is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). After transplantation, many pharmacological interactions have been described. Corticosteroids induce both CYP3A and P-gp activity. This study was designed to investigate the presence of a clinically significant interaction between steroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation. METHODS: We studied 83 renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus after transplantation. Patients were divided into three groups, according to steroid dose (low: 0-0.15 mg/kg/day; intermediate: 0.16-0.25 mg/kg/day; and high: >0.25 mg/kg/day). All other medications, including those known to interact with CYP3A and/or P-gp, were recorded. Steroid dosage, tacrolimus dosage, tacrolimus trough concentration (C0) and tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio [C0 divided by the 24 h dosage (mg/kg)] were assessed for each dosage group after 1 and 3 months of tacrolimus treatment. RESULTS: The three groups were not different as regards the use of non-immunosuppressive treatments or clinical events. At 1 and 3 months, the tacrolimus doses and concentration/dose ratios differed significantly in the three steroid dosage groups. With the higher doses, higher tacrolimus doses were needed to achieve the blood tacrolimus targeted trough level. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that pharmacokinetic interaction occurs between steroids and tacrolimus in renal transplant patients. The higher the steroid dosage, the higher the dosage of tacrolimus needed to achieve target trough levels in these patients. The most likely interaction mechanism is specific enzymatic induction of CYP3A and/or P-gp. Interaction is present, even when the steroid dosage is low. The clinical events liable to occur during steroid sparing or tapering must be taken into account because it may be associated with episodes of tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity.     

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population. METHODS: Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.     

Enalapril/amlodipine combination in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Most hypertensive renal transplant recipients require two or more antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control. However, which medications must be combined is still a matter of debate. METHODS: A prospective randomized open-label blinded evaluation trial comparing the six-month effects of the amlodipine-enalapril combination (n = 32) vs. enalapril alone (n = 33) and vs. amlodipine alone (n = 34) on arterial pressure, renal function, albuminuria and tolerability. RESULTS: At six months, diastolic arterial pressure was more adequately controlled (i.e., <90 mmHg) in the combination group than in the amlodipine and enalapril groups (100% vs. 82.4% and 84.8%, respectively, p = 0.038). The same trend was observed for systolic arterial pressure (65.6% vs. 58.8% and 51.5%, NS). The six-month change in albuminuria was similar in the combination group and in the enalapril group (-64.7% vs. -59.5%); however, patients in the combination group exhibited a greater reduction in albuminuria than in the amlodipine group (-64.7% vs. -29.0%, p = 0.002). As compared with baseline values, serum creatinine and potassium remained unchanged in the combination group, whereas they increased by 9 +/- 12 micromol/L (p = 0.01) and by 0.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (p < 0.01), respectively, in the enalapril group. The cyclosporine trough levels remained unchanged in the combination group, but increased in the amlodipine group. CONCLUSION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-calcium-channel blocker (CCB) combination controls arterial pressure more adequately than ACEI alone or CCB alone, reduces albuminuria and may prevent the ACEI-induced initial rise in serum creatinine.     

Low toxicity regimens in renal transplantation: a country subset analysis of the Symphony study

Regional transplant practices may affect clinical outcomes within multinational studies. This study evaluated whether the overall results from the Symphony study can be generalized to the participating countries. De novo adult renal transplant recipients ( n  = 1645) were randomized to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, or daclizumab induction plus low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus, all in addition to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Data for the highest patient-recruiting countries, Spain ( n  = 275), Germany ( n  = 316) and Turkey ( n  = 258), were compared. Patient transplant characteristics were different among the country subsets; only deceased donors in Spain, more expanded criteria donors in Germany, and mainly living donors in Turkey. Efficacy results for the three countries were consistent with that of the overall study – renal function and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates were superior with low-dose tacrolimus. Turkey had higher mean calculated glomerular filtration rate across all treatment groups (60.6–72.2 ml/min) compared with that of Spain (51.1–57.5 ml/min) and Germany (51.3–62.9 ml/min). Spain and Turkey had lower BPAR rates across the four treatment groups compared with the overall study; Germany had much higher rates (21.0–54.2%). These findings confirm the general applicability of the Symphony study results and highlight the importance of inclusion of patients from different geographic origins in randomized clinical trials.     

A randomized trial of alemtuzumab vs. anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation

Abstract:  The role of alemtuzumab as an immunosuppressive agent is evolving. We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing alemtuzumab and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in adult kidney and pancreas transplantation using similar maintenance immunosuppression. Between February 1, 2005 and June 15, 2006 (median follow-up six months), 98 patients were randomized either to alemtuzumab (n = 48) or to rATG (n = 50) induction; 77 (79%) underwent kidney alone (KA) transplant, 17 (17%) pancreas–kidney transplant, and four (4%) pancreas after kidney transplant. Of 77 KA transplants, 66 (86%) were from deceased donors and 31 (40%) from expanded criteria donors (ECD). Re-transplantation, HLA-match, antibody titer, ECD, race, cytomegalovirus status, steroid use, delayed graft function, preservation time, and immunological risk were similar between the two induction groups. Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. Survival, initial length of stay, delayed graft function, and overall acute rejection rates were similar between alemtuzumab and rATG groups, but acute rejection occurred in nine (20%) rATG patients compared with zero (0%) alemtuzumab patients who received KA transplants (p = 0.007). Mean induction costs differed in the alemtuzumab ($1474) and rATG ($4996, p < 0.001) groups. In the short term after kidney and pancreas transplantation, alemtuzumab and rATG induction therapies are similarly safe and effective.     

Low-dose OKT3 induction therapy following renal transplantation: a controlled study

In a prospective clinical study we tested the immunosuppressiveproperties and toxicity of low-dose OKT3 induction therapy inrenal transplant recipients. 50 consecutive renal transplantrecipients were alternat ingly assigned to low-dose OKT3 inductionor prednisolone/cyclosporin. Low-dose OKT3 induction treatmentconsisted of 0.5 mg OKT3 twice daily for 10 days, initiallycombined with azathioprine and prednisolone maintenance immunosuppressionthat was converted to prednisolone/cyclosporin at the end ofthe course. During a 15–29-month follow-up period, low-doseOKT3 induction therapy was found to reduce significantly theincidence of acute rejections, as com-pared to the usual prednisolone/cyclosporinmainten ance immunosuppression (21 versus 52%, P=0.02). Therealso was a tendency towards an improved graft function afterlow-dose OKT3, although no signific ance was reached. Furthermore,compared to a histor ical control group of renal transplantpatients in whom acute rejection was treated with 5 mg OKT3daily, low-dose OKT3 appeared to cause fewer side-effects. Weconclude that low-dose OKT3 induction therapy is superior toprednisolone/cyclosporin in preventing acute rejection afterrenal transplantation and that it is better tolerated than conventionalOKT3 treatment.     

Efficacy and Toxicity of a Protocol Using Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Daclizumab in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Allotransplant Model

A regimen combining sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab has recently been shown to provide adequate immunosuppression for allogeneic islet transplantation in humans, but remains unproven for primarily vascularized allografts. We evaluated this regimen for renal allograft transplantation in mismatched nonhuman primates. Dosages of sirolimus and tacrolimus were adjusted for trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL and 4-6 ng/mL, respectively. Treated monkeys (n = 5) had significantly prolonged allograft survival, with a mean survival of 36 days vs. 7 days in untreated controls (n = 6, p = 0.008). Four of five treated animals, but none of the controls, developed fibrinoid vascular necrosis of the small intestine. A review of gut histology from animals on other immunosuppressive protocols performed by our laboratory suggested that these lesions were a result of sirolimus exposure. In summary, this regimen prolongs the survival of vascularized renal allografts, but is limited by profound GI toxicity in rhesus macaques.     

Discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil from a tacrolimus-based triple regimen 2 months after renal transplantation: a comparative randomized multicentre study

Previous clinical data suggested that with a tacrolimus-based regimen adjunctive immunosuppressives may be withdrawn after an initial treatment period. This study investigated the early discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from a standard triple regimen. Patients were randomized either to receive a continued tacrolimus/MMF/steroids triple regimen (control group) or to reduce and then stop the MMF dose (MMF stop group). Both groups received identical daily tacrolimus and corticosteroid doses. The initial MMF dose was 1 g/day in both arms, but in the MMF stop group the dose was reduced to 0.5 g/day from week 7 to week 12 and then stopped. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 74 (control) and 78 (MMF stop) patients. MMF was tapered off as planned in 82.9% of the patients in the MMF stop arm. The 6-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was similar in both arms (21.6% control, 16.7% MMF stop). Graft loss occurred in 5.4% (control) and 3.8% (MMF stop) of the patients. MMF could be safely discontinued from a tacrolimus-based triple therapy early after transplantation without any rebound in efficacy during the 6-month follow-up period. (Name of registry: ClinicalStudyResults.org, number: FG-02-CEE-01, date: 9 June 2006).     

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Comparison studies of calcineurin inhibitors as cornerstone immunosuppressants in renal transplantation have demonstrated that tacrolimus consistently reduces acute rejection rates and, in some studies, also improves long-term renal outcome in comparison to cyclosporin A (CsA). The aim of the present 2 year follow-up of the European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome in terms of rate of acute rejection, graft and patient survival and graft function. METHODS: The European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was a randomized, comparative 6 month trial of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and CsA in combination with both azathioprine and steroids. The intent-to-treat population (ITT) consisted of 286 patients in the tacrolimus arm and 271 in the CsA microemulsion (CsA-ME) arm. Whereas whole blood level targets were 10-20 and 5-15 ng/ml for tacrolimus and 100-400 and 100-200 ng/ml for CsA during months 0-3 and 4-6, respectively, during the investigator-driven follow-up after termination of the main study (months 7-24) no specific calcineurin inhibitor target levels were required. Follow-up data were collected at 2 years post-transplantation from 237 (82.9% of the ITT population) patients who received tacrolimus and 222 (81.9% of the ITT population) patients who received CsA-ME. RESULTS: Calculated on ITT populations, mortality (2.0% vs 3.3%; P<0.05 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was lower, but rate of graft loss (9.3% vs 11.2%; P = 0.12 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was not significantly different after 2 years with tacrolimus- vs CsA-ME-based immunosuppression. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly lower (19.6%) with tacrolimus than with CsA-ME (37.3%) during months 0-6 (P<0.0001), but was not significantly different during months 7-12 and 13-24 of follow-up (1.7% and 0.8% with tacrolimus and 4.7% and 0.9% with CsA-ME, respectively). A composite endpoint consisting of graft loss, patient death and biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred significantly more frequently in CsA-ME patients than in tacrolimus patients (42.8% vs 25.9%; P<0.001) during 24 months follow-up. Renal function 2 years post-transplant, measured by serum creatinine concentrations, was significantly better in tacrolimus-based compared with CsA-ME-based immunosuppression (136.9 vs 161.6 micromol/l; P<0.01). Cornerstone immunosuppression remained unchanged in 82.5% and 66.2% of patients treated with tacrolimus and CsA-ME, respectively. At 2 years, more patients in the tacrolimus arm were off steroids and received calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy, and fewer tacrolimus patients remained on a triple immunosuppressive regimen. The cardiovascular risk profile was affected favourably in the tacrolimus arm, with lower cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations (despite less use of cholesterol-lowering drugs); no significant difference in requirement for antidiabetic medication was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 year study results confirm that tacrolimus is a highly efficacious cornerstone immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may induce long-term benefits with regard to graft function and graft survival. The overall side-effect profile is considered to be favourable.