Montelukast decreased exhaled nitric oxide in children with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a simple and noninvasive method for assessment of inflammatory airway diseases. eNO is elevated in adolescent patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and related to bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oral loratadine, montelukast, nasal budesonide or nasal sodium cromoglycate could reduce airway inflammation as indicated by decrease of eNO in children with perennial allergic rhinitis as demonstrated by eNO levels. METHODS: A randomized and investigator-blinded study was conducted in a hospital-based outpatient clinic. Children with perennial allergic rhinitis were divided into four groups and treated by loratadine, loratadine with nasal sodium cromoglycate, loratadine with oral montelukast, and loratadine with nasal budesonide, respectively. Allergic rhinitis scores, eNO and peak expiratory flow were measured before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Results showed that eNO in children with perennial allergic rhinitis was reduced by nasal budesonide and oral montelukast within 2 weeks (24.56 +/- 14.42 vs 18.42 +/- 12.48, P < 0.001, in budesonide group; 27.81 +/- 13.4 vs 19.09 +/- 10.45, P < 0.001, in montelukast group), but not in the loratadine and cromoglycate groups. In contrast, loratadine or sodium cromoglycate also did not decrease eNO levels although they could decrease the symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that four common treatment modalities could effectively release symptom scores, but decrease of airway inflammation as determined by decrease of eNO might be only achieved by nasal budesonide and montelukast, but not nasal sodium cromoglycate and loratadine. Children with perennial allergic rhinitis with high eNO levels may require oral montelukast or nasal budesonide treatment to prevent airway hyperresponsiveness.     

Efficacy of nebulized budesonide compared to oral prednisolone in acute bronchial asthma

To evaluate the efficacy of nebulized budesonide compared to oral prednisolone early in the emergency room management of acute asthma, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eighty children, 2 years to 12 years of age, with acute moderate attacks of asthma, were randomized into two groups. One group received nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) and placebo at half-hourly intervals for three doses, and a single dose of oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg) (prednisolone group) and other group received three doses of nebulized salbutamol and budesonide (800 microg) at half-hourly intervals and a single dose of placebo tablets (budesonide group). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, but after three doses of nebulization oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, pulmonary index and respiratory distress score were significantly improved in the budesonide group compared to prednisolone group (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients who were fit for discharge at the end of 2 h after the third dose of nebulization was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the prednisolone group (22/ 41, 54% vs 7/39, 18%, p < 0.001). The data suggest that a combination of nebulized salbutamol and budesonide should be preferred in the emergency room management of children with acute moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma and who are not on prior oral or inhaled steroid therapy.     

Role of steroids in treatment of croup

Unless there are clear contraindications, corticosteroids are the treatment of choice in mild, moderate and severe croup. Oral dexamethasone in a dose of 0.15 mg/kg to 0.6 mg/kg is recommended. Whenever a nebulizer is available budesonide in a dose of 2 mg should also be given, atleast to the more severe cases. Although nebulized budesonide (2 mg) has been shown to be as quick in action as nebulized Ladrenaline (4 mg) most workers would recommend additional adrenalin for immediate relief whenever required.     

Nebulized budesonide after hospitalization for recurrent bronchial obstruction in children younger than 18 months

A multi‐center, double‐blind, randomized dose–response study was performed to assess the effect of 3 months of treatment with two different doses of inhaled nebulized budesonide in children with acute recurrent bronchial obstruction (BO) causing hospitalization. Steroid‐naive children younger than 18 months were included when admitted to hospital because of BO for at least the second time, and were followed‐up monthly for 15 months. Forty‐five of 49 subjects (43 boys, 2 girls) (mean age 9.3 months upon inclusion) completed the study. Twenty‐four patients (20 boys, 4 girls) received nebulized budesonide 0.5 mg twice daily for 1 month followed by 0.25 mg daily for the next 2 months, whereas 25 children received 0.1 mg twice daily throughout the 3‐month treatment period. Outcome (number of BO episodes, time to first BO after start of treatment, and use of rescue medication), as well as height/length and weight, were assessed at the start of treatment and monthly for the following 3 months, as well as for 12 months after cessation of treatment (15 months in total). There was an overall tendency towards better symptom control (fewer episodes of acute BO during treatment and follow‐up, fewer hospital visits because of acute BO, lower clinical score during follow‐up, and less use of rescue medication during follow‐up) in the high‐dose treatment group vs. the low‐dose treatment group. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance for any of the outcomes. The only significant difference in effect between the groups was fewer children in the high‐dose group treated openly with nebulized budesonide during follow‐up. Length/height and weight gain did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups throughout the study. There was no significant dose‐dependent beneficial effect of 3 months of treatment with nebulized budesonide in infants and toddlers with at least two hospitalizations for acute bronchial obstruction.     

Linear growth of very young asthmatic children treated with high-dose nebulized budesonide

The aim of this open study was to observe linear growth in young children with asthma treated with nebulized budesonide. Infants and young children (< 3 years old) with severe uncontrolled asthma were studied. They were treated with nebulized budesonide (1-4mgday^-1) and treated for at least 6 months. Height standard deviation scores (HtSDS) were measured before ("pre-measurements") immediately prior to commencing nebulized budesonide therapy (baseline) and after at least 6 months of therapy ("post-measurements"). The mean HtSDS score at pretreatment was -0.21 and at baseline had fallen further to -0.46. The mean HtSDS increased to -0.17 when the post-measurements were made ( p = 0.035) after at least 6 months of nebulized budesonide therapy. Treatment with nebulized budesonide for longer than 6 months in very young children with severe asthma was not associated with reduced linear growth.     

The effect of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma

Background: The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma remains a controversial subject. Objective and methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group clinical trial on the effect of a 5-d course of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma was performed. The need for systemic corticosteroid intervention was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Results: Sixty-seven children aged 6 to 15 y were enrolled. During the emergency department phase, they received three nebulizations of either budesonide(1 mg/dose) or placebo, and then in the home phase of the study, they continued their study medications twice a day for another 4 d. Though the level of improvement in the emergency department phase was similar between the groups given either budesonide or placebo treatments (6.8±1.9% vs 4.0±1.5%, p=0.30, respectively), nebulized budesonide caused a trend towards a benefit in terms of the need for systemic corticosteroid intervention (2/33 vs 7/34, p=0.07), but not in secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Though we show a tendency towards a benefit with nebulized budesonide in children with mild to moderate exacerbations in terms of prevention of progression of the illness, the documented benefit is small and includes, at least, consideration for clinical significance, cost-effectiveness, impracticality and safety.     

Nebulized budesonide versus oral steroid in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma

The aim of this study was to assess whether nebulized budesonide may substitute for oral prednisolone in the management of children whose asthma is severe enough to warrant hospital admission, but who have no life threatening features. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study nebulized budesonide (2 mg 8 hourly) was compared with oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg at entry and again at 24 h) in 46 children admitted to hospital with severe asthma exacerbations. Efficacy variables (including lung function measurements such as the primary outcome variable, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and symptoms) were measured 24 h after treatment initiation. FEV₁ improved significantly compared to baseline in patients who received nebulized budesonide compared to the prednislone group. The data show nebulized budesonide to be at least as effective as oral steroid in improving lung function and symptom severity in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma.     

Effects of nebulized corticosteroids therapy on hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in young children with recurrent or persistent wheeze

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are preferred drugs for the long-term treatment of all severities of asthma in children. However, data about the safety of ICS in infants is lacking. So, it is essential to do further clinical studies to examine the safety and efficacy of ICS in this population. In this study, the effects of nebulized budesonide and nebulized fluticasone propionate suspensions on hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis is examined in infants with recurrent or persistent wheeze. Thirty-one children aged 6–24 months admitted to our hospital between January and December 2005 with symptoms of recurrent or persistent wheeze were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.25 mg BUD or 0.25 mg fluticasone propionate twice daily for 6 wk and half dose for another 6 wk with a jet nebulizer at home. Blood samples for basal cortisol concentration, adrenocarticotropic hormone, glucose, HbA1c and electrolytes were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the study. Adrenal function assessment was based on changes in cosyntropin-stimulated plasma cortisol levels. The study was completed with 31 patients, 16 of whom received BUD and 15 FP. All patients except one had plasma cortisol concentrations above 500 nmol/l (18 μg/dl) or had an incremental rise in cortisol of >200 nmol/l after stimulation. Although nebulized steroids seem to be safe in infancy, we recommend that adrenal functions should be tested periodically during long-term treatment with nebulized steroids.     

Inhaled budesonide in acute asthma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of aerosolized budesonide therapy (with metered dose inhaler and spacer) early in the emergency room treatment of acute moderate exacerbations of bronchial asthma in children. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Paediatric Emergency Service of an urban teaching hospital and a tertiary case referral centre. STUDY POPULATION: Sixty children between 3 and 12 years of age with an acute moderate exacerbation of asthma. INTERVENTION: All patients received humidified oxygen (5-8 L/min by Venturi(R) mask; Hudson Respiratory Care, Temecula, CA, USA), nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg in 3 mL saline) and were randomized to receive either budesonide (400 microg) or placebo inhalation (MDI and spacer) at half hourly intervals for three doses. If there was an inadequate response or no response to treatment at the end of 2 h, oxygen and salbutamol therapy were continued and the patient was given one of dose intravenous hydrocortisone and was started on an aminophylline infusion. If there was no response at the end of a further 4 h, the patient was hospitalized. INITIAL EVALUATION AND MONITORING: Colour, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate, accessory muscle usage, chest retraction, wheeze, oxygen saturation (by pulse oximetery) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was recorded at admission and thereafter at hourly intervals for 3 h or until till the child recovered. The need for oxygen therapy after 2 h and need for hospitalization were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant improvement in respiratory status at the end of 2 h. However, children in the intervention group showed greater improvements in RR and PEFR (P < 0. 05) and respiratory distress score (P < 0.1). A significantly lower proportion of the intervention group patients required oxygen therapy for more than 2 h (23% vs 50%; P < 0.05) and aminophylline infusion and systemic corticosteroid therapy (7% vs 27%; P < 0.05). None of the children in the budesonide group, in contrast to 23% of those in the placebo group, required hospitalization (P < 0.05). The length of hospital stay (i.e. time taken to recover from acute asthma) was significantly shorter in the intervention group (3.2 +/- 2.5 h) than in the placebo group (7.8 +/- 11.3 h; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Aerosolized budesonide therapy (with MDI and spacer) together with nebulized salbutamol early in the emergency room treatment of acute moderate exacerbations of asthma helped in early recovery and decreased the need for hospitalization. It may be worthwhile calculating this regimen for home-based early treatment of acute exacerbations.     

Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide in young children during tidal breathing through a facemask

Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) offers a non-invasive means for assessment of airway inflammation. The currently available methods are difficult to apply in preschool children. We evaluated four methods potentially applicable for eNO measurement during tidal breathing in young children. eNO was assessed during tidal breathing in 24 children, 2-7 yr old, using a facemask which separated nasal and oral airflow. Facemasks with and without a one-way valve allowing exhalation through the nose were used. Expiratory flow control was not attempted. Measurements of eNO were performed both on-line and off-line. In 11 children, 8-12 yr old, measurements were compared with the standard single breath on-line method. eNO was significantly lower applying the one-way valve in on-line and off-line measurements in comparison with measurements without the valve [4.6 and 3.9 parts per billion (ppb) vs. 6.9 ppb and 6.5 ppb]. The mean within subject coefficient of variation (CV) was significantly lower in on-line measurements with the one-way valve (9.6%) compared with the other three methods (18.8, 27.7 and 29.3% respectively). Measurements with a facemask fitted with a one-way valve yielded similar eNO levels as the standard single breath method (7.0 ppb vs. 6.9 ppb) and reproducibility (9.8% vs. 7.1%). In conclusion, reproducible measurements of eNO can be obtained without control of expiration flow using a facemask fitted with a one-way valve on the nasal compartment. The likely explanation to this is that the one-way valve reduces the admixture of nasal NO, thereby improving the reliability of eNO measurements.     

A review of once-daily delivery of anti-asthmatic drugs in children

Determining which drug is suitable for, and which patient can benefit from, a once-daily dose of prophylactic treatment is important for practitioners who want to improve therapeutic compliance in children with asthma. According to the literature, once-daily delivery of cromolyn sodium, nedocromil or beclomethasone dipropionate must be avoided. On the other hand, switching from a twice-daily to a once-daily regimen is efficient and safe only in children with well-controlled asthma using nebulized or dry-powder budesonide, dry-powder fluticasone propionate, flunisolide, or sustained-release theophylline. Such information is not available for long-acting β2-agonists, except for oral bambuterol. Initiating a once-daily treatment in previously untreated children can only be based on low doses of inhaled budesonide or on an oral drug, montelukast. Further studies in children with severe asthma or treated with metered-dose inhalers and spacer devices are required before recommending a once-daily drug delivery in such situations.     

Additive effect of eosinophilia and atopy on exhaled nitric oxide levels in children with or without a history of respiratory symptoms

Although atopy and blood eosinophilia both influence exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) measurements, no study has quantified their single or combined effect. We assessed the combined effect of atopy and blood eosinophilia on eNO in unselected schoolchildren. In 356 schoolchildren (boys/girls: 168/188) aged 9.0-11.5 yr, we determined eNO, total serum IgE, blood eosinophil counts and did skin prick tests (SPT) and spirometry. Parents completed a questionnaire on their children's current or past respiratory symptoms. Atopy was defined by a SPT >3 mm and eosinophilia by a blood cell count above the 80th percentile (>310 cells/ml). eNO levels were about twofold higher in atopic-eosinophilic subjects than in atopic subjects with low blood eosinophils [24.3 p.p.b. (parts per billion) vs. 14.1 p.p.b.] and than non-atopic subjects with high or low blood eosinophils (24.3 p.p.b. vs. 12.2 p.p.b. and 10.9 p.p.b.) (p <0.001 for both comparisons). The additive effect of atopy and high eosinophil count on eNO levels remained unchanged when subjects were analyzed separately by sex or by a positive history of wheeze (n=60), respiratory symptoms other than wheeze (n=107) or without respiratory symptoms (n=189). The frequency of sensitization to Dermatophagoides (Dpt or Dpf) was similar in atopic children with and without eosinophilia (66.2% and 67.4%, respectively); eosinophilia significantly increased eNO levels in Dp-sensitized children as well in children sensitized to other allergens. In a multiple linear regression analysis, eNO levels were mainly explained by the sum of positive SPT wheals and a high blood eosinophil count (t=4.8 and 4.3, p=0.000), but also by the presence of respiratory symptoms (especially wheeze) and male sex (t=2.6 and 2.0, p=0.009 and 0.045, respectively). Measuring eNO could be a simple, non-invasive method for identifying subjects at risk of asthma in unselected school populations.     

Consistently high levels of exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma

Background: Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels in children are unstable because they are regulated by many potent factors. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of eNO levels between a long interval and other lung functions in normal and asthmatic children. Methods: Eighty‐three elementary school children (aged 11–12 years; male : female, 39 : 44) participated in this study. Lung function, airway resistance and eNO levels were measured twice: the first measurement was in autumn 2007, and the second was one year later. Results: There were 62 non‐asthmatic control children (male : female, 31 : 31) and 21 asthmatic children (male : female, 8 : 13). In both the first and the second examination, the levels of eNO in children with asthma were higher than those in children without asthma. The parameters of lung function and the respiratory resistance in children without asthma showed a good correlation between the results of the first and second examinations. The eNO level in non‐asthmatic children showed a good correlation between the two. On the other hand, the peripheral airway parameters of lung function and the respiratory resistance in children with asthma were not correlated between the first and the second examinations. The eNO level in these patients was well correlated between the two examinations. Conclusions: These data suggest that the eNO level showed good reproducibility in children with and without asthma. The eNO level is therefore considered to be a useful marker for reproducibly evaluating a subject's airway condition.     

Nebulized budesonide for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma in infants and toddlers*

Maintenance treatment with nebulized budesonide was studied in young children with asthma not controlled without steroids. In a blind parallel-group study for 18 weeks, 102 children, mean age 22 (5–47) months, were randomized for treatment starting with 0.25 or 1 mg b.i.d. The patients were reviewed every 3 weeks, and if symptom control had been achieved the dose was reduced, otherwise it was kept. The clinical effect was very good with both dose regimens. The median time to 7 consecutive days without any asthma symptoms was about 1 month with both, highlighting the importance of the duration of therapy rather than the benefits of a high starting dose. In 18 of 24 children who attained the placebo stage, symptoms had reappeared at the last visit. Although an overall minimal effective maintenance dose could not be demonstrated, 47% achieved symptom control on 0.25 mg b.i.d., i.e. fulfilled criteria for further dose reduction. No significant side effects were seen. On average, 25% of the nominal dose reached the patients.     

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Dexamethasone and Racemic Epinephrine in the Treatment of Croup

ABSTRACT. Seventy-two children hospitalized for croup received on admission a single dose of either 0.6 mg/kg dexamethasone or an equivalent placebo intramuscularly from randomized ampules; subsequently the same patients were randomized to receive either nebulized racemic epinephrine or saline by intermittent positive pressure breathing. Of the four treatment groups those receiving a placebo injection and nebulized saline had the slowest recovery by all criteria. Dexamethasone and nebulized epinephrine reduced the symptoms and hastened recovery, but dexamethasone was more effective by clinical evaluation at 6 and 12 hours post admission. The patients given dexamethasone had a significantly shorter hospital stay than those receiving placebo. We conclude that a single injection of a potent corticosteroid is beneficial in acute spasmodic croup. Nebulized racemic epinephrine given with an appropriate device is also effective, but the effect of epinephrine is less remarkable in patients treated with dexamethasone.     

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexamethasone and racemic epinephrine in the treatment of croup

Seventy-two children hospitalized for croup received on admission a single dose of either 0.6 mg/kg dexamethasone or an equivalent placebo intramuscularly from randomized ampules; subsequently the same patients were randomized to receive either nebulized racemic epinephrine or saline by intermittent positive pressure breathing. Of the four treatment groups those receiving a placebo injection and nebulized saline had the slowest recovery by all criteria. Dexamethasone and nebulized epinephrine reduced the symptoms and hastened recovery, but dexamethasone was more effective by clinical evaluation at 6 and 12 hours post admission. The patients given dexamethasone had a significantly shorter hospital stay than those receiving placebo. We conclude that a single injection of a potent corticosteroid is beneficial in acute spasmodic croup. Nebulized racemic epinephrine given with an appropriate device is also effective, but the effect of epinephrine is less remarkable in patients treated with dexamethasone.     

Exhaled nitric oxide, total serum IgE and allergic sensitization in childhood asthma and allergic rhinitis

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels are correlated with several markers of atopy and inflammatory activity in the airways, but the relationship between eNO and total serum IgE has not been fully elucidated in the context of allergic sensitization. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between eNO, total serum IgE and allergic sensitization in childhood asthma and allergic rhinitis. eNO levels, lung function, skin prick tests and total serum IgE were determined in 109 children (mean age, 10.4 yr) with mild intermittent asthma and in 41 children (mean age, 10.1 yr) with allergic rhinitis; 25 healthy non-atopic children were recruited as controls. eNO levels (median) were significantly higher in patients with asthma (22.7 p.p.b.) and in those with allergic rhinitis (15.3 p.p.b.) than in healthy controls (5.9 p.p.b.). Children with allergic asthma had higher eNO levels than children with allergic rhinitis. A significant positive correlation was found between eNO and total serum IgE (asthma, r = 0.42, p < 0.0001; allergic rhinitis, r = 0.31, p < 0.01), and between eNO and the number of positive skin prick tests (asthma, r = 0.31, p < 0.0001; allergic rhinitis, r = 0.39, p < 0.01). eNO levels were better correlated with total IgE than with the number of positive skin prick tests. This correlation was independent of allergic sensitization. High total serum IgE represents a specific and predictive marker of eNO increase in children with asthma or allergic rhinitis. This finding adds further support to the hypothesis that increased serum IgE could be a marker itself of airway inflammation in patients with allergic disease.     

健康儿童呼出气体一氧化氮水平及其与肺功能相关性研究

目的 测定健康儿童呼出气体一氧化氮(eNO)浓度及其与肺功能的相关性.方法 随机测定100名7～8岁健康儿童(男53名;7岁43名)eNO及肺功能,采用SAS(8.2版)软件进行秩相关分析.结果 受试儿童eNO水平[中位数(四分位数间距)为8×10-9[(6～11)×10-9],其中男8×10-9[(6～11)×10-9],女8×10-9[(6～11)×10-9].eNO与肺功能无相关性(复相关系数r=0.22,P=0.32).eNO与身高、体质量有明显的相关性(r=0.22,P=0.03;r=0.23,P=0.02).结论 健康儿童eNO与肺功能无相关性.eNO与肺功能联合检测可全面认识气道炎症和气道高反应性.     

Efficacy of sequential early systemic and inhaled corticosteroid therapy in the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity

In order to assess the efficacy of a combination of systemic and nebulized corticosteroids in reducing the incidence and severity of chronic lung disease (CLD) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants, 60 ventilator-dependent infants ≤ 1500g were randomly assigned to receive either steroids or placebo as of 7d. The steroid group ( n = 30, GA = 25:8 ± 1:6 weeks, BW = 731 ± 147 g) received systemic dexamethasone for 3 d, followed by nebulized budesonide for 18 d. Control infants ( n = 30, GA = 25:9 ± 1.8 weeks, BW = 796 ± 199 g) received systemic and inhaled saline. Steroid-treated infants required less ventilatory support between 9 and 17 d ( p < 0:01), and had greater lung compliance at 10 d ( p = 0:01), but not subsequently. CLD incidence at 36 weeks was 45.5% vs 56.0% in controls, and fewer steroid-treated infants required dexamethasone rescue (23.3% vs 56.7%, p = 0:017). Survival to discharge was similar (73.3% vs 83.3%), as were the durations of mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen use, and hospitalization. Tracheal effluent elastase/albumin ratios and serum cortisol values did not differ between groups, and no adverse effects were noted. We conclude that early dexamethasone administration was associated with improved pulmonary function, which was not sustained with nebulized budesonide. However, the steroid regimen studied reduced the need for dexamethasone rescue in infants with CLD.     

Effects of montelukast on symptoms and eNO in children with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a marker reflecting airway inflammation. This study was conducted to investigate whether montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, could be used for the management of asthma and how fast the montelukast sodium decreased airway inflammation as demonstrated by eNO levels. METHODS: Twenty children aged 6-14 years (mean age: 9.2 +/- 2.4 years; mean weight 30 +/- 4.6 kg) with mild to moderate asthma were recruited for the study. They received montelukast plus an inhaled short-acting beta2 agonist as open and uncontrolled therapy. Asthma score (AS) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and eNO concentrations were measured at pretreatment (0 week) and post-treatment (1 and 2 weeks) as well as 2 weeks after withdrawal of therapy. RESULTS: In one week, the eNO levels (33.3 +/- 15.5 p.p.b. vs 14.8 +/- 8.6 p.p.b.; P < 0.05), and AS (4.2 +/- 1.3 vs 1.8 +/- 1.3; P < 0.05) decreased rapidly, and PEFR (206.9 +/- 69.7 L/min vs 236.2 +/- 69.8 L/min; P < 0.05) increased. Concurrent beta2 agonist use decreased from a mean +/- SD of 2.2 +/- 0.4-1.3 +/- 0.3 puffs per weeks (P < 0.05). After the withdrawal of treatment for 2 weeks, the eNO levels (29.2 +/- 16.1 p.p.b) rebounded again, although the improvements in AS (1.1 +/- 1.3) and PEFR (245.0 +/- 91.3 L/min) persisted. CONCLUSION: Oral montelukast sodium treatment of these children with mild to moderate asthma effectively improved asthmatic symptoms and suppressed airway inflammation in 1 week, suggesting that this leukotriene antagonist combined with short-acting beta2 agonists may provide effective treatment option in mild to moderate childhood asthma. Larger, controlled, and double-blinded studies are needed to confirm these preliminary open uncontrolled observations.