Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer

A deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR) is present in 10–20% of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a favourable prognosis in early stage disease. Data on patients with advanced disease are scarce. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of sporadic dMMR in advanced CRC. Data were collected from a phase III study in 820 advanced CRC patients. Expression of mismatch repair proteins was examined by immunohistochemistry. In addition microsatellite instability analysis was performed and the methylation status of the MLH1 promoter was assessed. We then correlated MMR status to clinical outcome. Deficient mismatch repair was found in only 18 (3.5%) out of 515 evaluable patients, of which 13 were caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. The median overall survival in proficient MMR (pMMR), dMMR caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter and total dMMR was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval 16.2–18.8), 7.4 months (95% CI 3.7–16.9) and 10.2 months (95% CI 5.9–19.8), respectively. The disease control rate in pMMR and dMMR patients was 83% (95% CI 79–86%) and 56% (30–80%), respectively. We conclude that dMMR is rare in patients with sporadic advanced CRC. This supports the hypothesis that dMMR tumours have a reduced metastatic potential, as is observed in dMMR patients with early stage disease. The low incidence of dMMR does not allow drawing meaningful conclusions about the outcome of treatment in these patients.     

散发性大肠癌的错配修复缺陷研究

目的探讨错配修复缺陷的散发性大肠癌的临床病理特征及错配修复缺陷检测手段的应用。方法对71例散发性大肠癌行hMLH1启动子甲基化检测、微卫星不稳定检测以及hMLH1和hMSH2的免疫组化检测,分析错配修复缺陷的散发性大肠癌的临床病理特征,探讨三种检测方法的应用价值。结果hMLH1基因启动子甲基化、微卫星不稳定和错配修复蛋白表达的阳性率分别为9.9%,9.9%和71.0%,三者密切相关。hMLH1启动子甲基化和微卫星不稳定的散发性大肠癌均具有结肠癌多发和低分化腺癌相对多见的特征。错配修复蛋白表达阴性的散发性大肠癌仅具有低分化腺癌相对多见的特征。结论错配修复缺陷的散发性大肠癌具有结肠癌和低分化腺癌多发的倾向,hMLH1启动子甲基化和微卫星不稳定以及错配修复蛋白的失表达三者密切相关。     

Associations of defect mismatch repair genes with prognosis and heredity in sporadic colorectal cancer

Background

Microsatellite instability arises due to defect mismatch repair (MMR) and occurs in 10–20% of sporadic colorectal cancer. The purpose was to investigate correlations between defect MMR, prognosis and heredity for colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives.

High resolution deletion mapping reveals frequent allelic losses at the DNA mismatch repair loci hMLH1 and hMSH3 in non-small cell lung cancer

To study the involvement of DNA mismatch repair genes in non-small cell lung cancer, matched normal and tumoral DNA samples from 31 patients were analyzed for both LOH and microsatellite instability with 34 markers at or linked to hMLH1(3p21),hMSH2(2p16), hMSH3(5q11-q13),hMSH6(2p16), hPMS1(2q32), and hPMS2 (7p22) loci. Chromosomal regions 3p21 and 5q11-q13 were found to be hemizygously deleted in 55% and 42% of the patients, respectively. Sixty five percent of the patients deleted at hMLH1 were also deleted at hMSH3. The shortest regions of overlap for 3p21 and 5q11-q13 deletions delimited by D3S1561/D3S1612 and D5S2107/D5S624, respectively, were restricted to genetic distances of only 1 cM. Currently, the hMLH1 (3p21) and hMSH3 (5q11-q13) genes are the only known candidates located within these regions. The mutational analysis of hMLH1 and hMSH3 in hemizygously deleted patients led to the detection of 2 new polymorphisms in hMSH3. The consequence of these allelic losses remains unclear, but the lack of inactivating mutation might explain that replication error, the hallmark of mismatch repair genes inactivation in cancer cells, was quasi-absent in tumors. We suggest that hMLH1 and hMSH3 genes could be involved in lung tumorigenesis through dosage effect in cellular functions other than replication error correction. Int. J. Cancer 77:173–180, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

散发性结直肠癌患者5号染色体杂合缺失分析

目的：探讨散发性结直肠癌患者5号染色体上与抑癌基因相关的杂合缺失（LOH）情况,并探讨新的抑癌基因位点,方法：对83例散发性结直肠癌患者基因组DNA,以15个不同荧光标记的高度多态性微卫星引物（平均遗传距离12．67cm)扩增相应的微卫星位点,用ABI PRISM 377测序仪进行基因扫描,统计各位点杂合缺失率。结果：在15个微卫星位点中,平均杂合缺失率为25．80％,5p中最高为D5S416,占48．15％,5q中最高为D5S471,占38．71％,D5S471周围的3个位点（D5S428,D5S2027 和 D5S2115）也存在高频的杂合缺失（＞30．00％）,结论：5号染色体上存在着高频的杂合缺失,其中5q13.3-31.1区域中,有与结直肠癌发生密切相关的APC,MCC,CTNNA1及IL家族等基因,而在5p15.1上的D5S416的杂合缺失率高达48．15％,此区域至今尚未发现与结直肠癌相关的基因位点,估计可能有未知的抑癌基因存在。     

Microsatellite instability and expression of mismatch repair genes in sporadic endometrial cancer coexisting with colorectal or breast cancer

The molecular background of sporadic endometrial cancer coexisting with colorectal or breast cancer is not clear. We investigated microsatellite instability (MSI) and status of mismatch repair (MMR) gene product, MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, in 63 sporadic endometrial cancers coexisting with colorectal or breast cancer. Sixteen sporadic endometrial cancers with colorectal cancers (EC), 26 sporadic endometrial cancers with breast cancer (EB) and 21 endometrial cancers without a coexisting cancer (control) were analyzed. EC had the highest frequency of MSI among the 3 groups (EC, 69%; EB, 23%; and control, 43%). Incidence of low-frequency MSI was significantly higher in EC (38%). Among endometrial cancer cases diagnosed before age 50, all high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) cases belonged to EC. Interestingly, incidence of MSI-H was significantly higher in tamoxifen-non-treated cases (75%) than that of treated cases (14%). These results suggest that alterations in MMR genes appear to be involved in carcinogenesis of EC but seem to be uncommon in those of EB. Presence of MSI in sporadic endometrial cancer may be a useful marker to predict the risk of colorectal cancer.     

Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in colorectal cancer with DNA mismatch repair deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) overexpression is a frequent but not universal event in colorectal cancer. It has been suggested that COX-2 protein expression is reduced in colorectal cancer with a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system, a phenomenon commonly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) but also present in up to 15% of sporadic tumors. Aim: To assess COX-2 expression in a large series of fully characterized colorectal cancer patients with respect to the MMR system and to dissect the mechanisms responsible for altered COX-2 expression in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were identified in a nationwide, prospective, multicenter study (EPICOLON project). Control MMR-proficient colorectal cancer patients were randomly selected. COX-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Personal and familial characteristics, as well as MSH2/MLH1 expression and germ line mutations, were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients, 46 with MMR deficiency and 107 with MMR proficiency, were included in the analysis. Overall, tumor COX-2 overexpression was observed in 107 patients (70%). COX-2 overexpression was observed in 85 patients (79%) with a MMR-proficient system, but only in 22 patients (48%) with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). The lack of COX-2 overexpression was independently associated with a MMR-deficient system (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-8.51; P = 0.001) and a poor degree of differentiation (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.30-11.31; P = 0.015). In the subset of patients with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer, lack of COX-2 overexpression correlated with a poor degree of differentiation, no fulfillment of Amsterdam II criteria, absence of MSH2/MLH1 germ line mutations, presence of tumor MSH2 expression, and lack of tumor MLH1 expression. CpG island promoter hypermethylation of COX2 was observed in 6 of 18 (33%) tumors lacking COX-2 expression in comparison with 2 of 28 (7%) tumors expressing this protein (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer do not show COX-2 overexpression, a fact observed almost exclusively in patients with sporadic forms. COX2 hypermethylation seems to be responsible for gene silencing in one third of them. These results suggest the potential utility of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in HNPCC chemoprevention and may explain the lack of response of this approach in some sporadic tumors.     

DNA mismatch repair proficiency executing 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer cells

Background

5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Several groups including ours have reported that stage II-III colorectal cancer patients whose tumors retain DNA Mismatch repair (MMR) function derive a benefit from 5-FU, but patients with tumors that lost MMR function do not. Although, MMR recognition of 5-FU incorporated in DNA has been demonstrated biochemically, it has not been demonstrated within cells to execute 5-FU cytotoxicity.

Aim

To establish an efficient construction model for 5-FU within DNA and demonstrate that 5-FU incorporated into DNA can trigger cellular cytotoxicity executed by the DNA MMR system.

Methods

We constructed a 5FdU-containing heteroduplex plasmid (5FdU plasmid) and 5FdU-containing linear ds-DNA (5FdU linear DNA), and transfected these into MMR-proficient, hMLH1^-/- and hMSH6^-/- cells. We observed cell growth characteristics of both transfectants for 5-FU-induced cytotoxicity.

Results

MMR-proficient cells transfected with the 5FdU plasmid but not the 5FdU linear DNA showed reduced cell proliferation by MTS and clonogenic assays, and demonstrated cell morphological change consistent with apoptosis. In MMR-deficient cells, neither the 5FdU plasmid nor 5FdU linear DNA induced cell growth or morphological changes different from controls.

Conclusion

5FdU as heteroduplex DNA in plasmid but not linear form triggered cytotoxicity in a MMR-dependent manner. Thus 5-FU incorporated into DNA, separated from its effects on RNA, can be recognized by DNA MMR to trigger cell death.Key words: 5-FU, colorectal cancer, mismatch repair system, heteroduplex plasmid     

Prognostic and predictive impact of DNA mismatch repair in the management of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancers develop via two major pathways that include chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability. Microsatellite instability occurs due to deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR), which can be caused by epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 MMR gene in sporadic colorectal cancers or germline mutations in MMR genes that result in Lynch syndrome. While the molecular origin of deficient MMR differs, sporadic and Lynch syndrome tumors share similar pathological features and have a more favorable stage-adjusted prognosis compared with MMR-proficient cases. While controversy remains, there is evidence to suggest that deficient MMR may predict a lack of benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The focus of this article is on the MMR phenotype and its prognostic and predictive implications for the management of patients with colorectal cancer.     

筛查结直肠癌DNA错配修复基因缺失的方法分析

目的:通过对筛查结直肠癌DNA错配修复(mismatch repair,MMR)基因缺失两种最常用的检测方法的分析,寻找更为经济有效的检测策略。方法:分析新疆医科大学第一附属医院2018年9月至2019年9月收治并行手术的结直肠癌患者的肿瘤组织223例,采用免疫组织化学法检测平台检测MLH1、MSH2、PMS2、MSH6的表达缺失情况,PCR-毛细管电泳法检测肿瘤微卫星不稳定(microstatellites instability,MSI)状态。结果:在223例结直肠癌中,27例(12.1%)MMR蛋白表达缺失(MMR deficiency,dMMR),196例(87.9%)MMR蛋白表达完整(MMR proficient,pMMR)。MLH1、MSH2、MSH6和PMS2的缺失率分别为9.0%(20/223)、1.8%(4/223)、2.7%(6/223)和9.4%(21/223)。包含PMS2和MSH6的2种抗体试验筛查dMMR结直肠癌的灵敏度和特异度与4种抗体试验(MLH1、MSH2、PMS2、MSH6)的灵敏度和特异度均相同。微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-high,MSI-H)2...     

DNA methylation markers in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arises as a consequence of the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in colonic epithelial cells during neoplastic transformation. Epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation in selected gene promoters, are recognized as common molecular alterations in human tumors. Substantial efforts have been made to determine the cause and role of aberrant DNA methylation (“epigenomic instability”) in colon carcinogenesis. In the colon, aberrant DNA methylation arises in tumor-adjacent, normal-appearing mucosa. Aberrant methylation also contributes to later stages of colon carcinogenesis through simultaneous methylation in key specific genes that alter specific oncogenic pathways. Hypermethylation of several gene clusters has been termed CpG island methylator phenotype and appears to define a subgroup of colon cancer distinctly characterized by pathological, clinical, and molecular features. DNA methylation of multiple promoters may serve as a biomarker for early detection in stool and blood DNA and as a tool for monitoring patients with CRC. DNA methylation patterns may also be predictors of metastatic or aggressive CRC. Therefore, the aim of this review is to understand DNA methylation as a driving force in colorectal neoplasia and its emerging value as a molecular marker in the clinic.     

Microsatellite instability and methylation of the DNA mismatch repair genes in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Methylation in the promoter region of the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 and microsatellite instability at three loci were analyzed in the tumor tissue from patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Microsatellite instability and promoter methylation were investigated by PCR, denaturing-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and digestion with methylation-specific restriction enzymes. RESULTS: Microsatellite instability was observed in 41% of the patients. hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes were methylated in 47% and 30% of the patients, respectively. BAT25 and BAT26 instability were associated with age and histopathology, respectively. Methylation frequency of the hMLH1 gene promoter was significantly higher in patients displaying a high level of microsatellite instability. Instability at the BAT 26 and D2S123 loci were associated with the MSI-high status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that microsatellite instability and modifications in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes are implicated in a significant proportion of the patients with head and neck cancer.     

DNA methylator and mismatch repair phenotypes are not mutually exclusive in colorectal cancer cell lines

A potential link between DNA repair and de novo methylation of exogenous sequences in colorectal cancer cell lines suggested that cells deficient in mismatch repair (MMR-) had an increased ability to silence the introduced virus promoter by DNA methylation due to the presence of a methylator phenotype (MET+) (Lengauer et al., 1997a). We explored this relationship in more detail and found that although there was a clear difference in the abilities of MMR+ cells to express the viral promoter compared to their MMR- counterparts, this difference was not consistently explained by levels of methylation in the viral promoter. Furthermore, we were unable to distinguish differences between the levels of methylation of six endogenous known CpG islands or 100 random DNA fragments containing CCGG sites within the cells. No consistent differences between the abilities of the cells to methylate the CpG island in exon 2 of the p16 gene were observed after transient demethylation by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine nor in the levels of expression of three human methyltransferase enzymes. Our results do not therefore support the existence of mutually exclusive DNA methylation (MET) and DNA repair (MMR) phenotypes. Oncogene (2000) 19, 943 - 952.     

Clinical and molecular characterisation of hereditary and sporadic metastatic colorectal cancers harbouring microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency

BackgroundPatients treated with chemotherapy for microsatellite unstable (MSI) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancer metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) exhibit poor prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of distinguishing sporadic from Lynch syndrome (LS)-like mCRCs.Patients and methodsMSI/dMMR mCRC patients were retrospectively identified in six French hospitals. Tumour samples were screened for MSI, dMMR, RAS/RAF mutations and MLH1 methylation. Sporadic cases were molecularly defined as those displaying MLH1/PMS2 loss of expression with BRAFV600E and/or MLH1 hypermethylation and no MMR germline mutation.ResultsAmong 129 MSI/dMMR mCRC patients, 81 (63%) were LS-like and 48 (37%) had sporadic tumours; 22% of MLH1/PMS2-negative mCRCs would have been misclassified using an algorithm based on local medical records (age, Amsterdam II criteria, BRAF and MMR statuses when locally tested), compared to a systematical assessment of MMR, BRAF and MLH1 methylation statuses. In univariate analysis, parameters associated with better overall survival were age (P < 0.0001), metastatic resection (P = 0.001) and LS-like mCRC (P = 0.01), but not BRAFV600E. In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.19, P = 0.01) and metastatic resection (HR = 4.2, P = 0.001) were associated with overall survival, but not LS. LS-like patients were associated with more frequent liver involvement, metastatic resection and better disease-free survival after metastasectomy (HR = 0.28, P = 0.01). Median progression-free survival of first-line chemotherapy was similar between the two groups (4.2 and 4.2 months; P = 0.44).ConclusionsLS-like and sporadic MSI/dMMR mCRCs display distinct natural histories. MMR, BRAF mutation and MLH1 methylation testing should be mandatory to differentiate LS-like and sporadic MSI/dMMR mCRC, to determine in particular whether immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy differs in these two populations.     

Roles of the DNA mismatch repair genes in colorectal tumorigenesis

A rapid increase in our understanding of the basic mechanisms involved in the genesis of colorectal cancer has occurred. Important factors include the activation of oncogenes, the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and the inactivation of DNA repair systems. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) has been linked to germ-line mutations that inactivate one allele of a DNA mismatch repair gene, which pre-disposes affected individuals to a high frequency of early-onset cancer. We have developed a cellular model to study HNPCC using the DNA mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer cell line HCT116 and corrected the genetic deficiency by chromosome transfer. Human chromosome 3 corrected all manifestations of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in the cell line and restored sensitivity to the toxic effects of certain DNA alkylating agents. Data suggest that the DNA mismatch repair genes not only participate in the recognition and repair of DNA mismatches during new strand synthesis but may also signal cell cycle arrest in the face of overwhelming DNA damage. Additional functions for the DNA mismatch repair genes in the maintenance of DNA replicative fidelity are being studied. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Validation of predictive models for germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer

Lynch syndrome is defined by the presence of germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Several models have been recently devised that predict mutation carrier status (Myriad Genetics, Wijnen, Barnetson, PREMM and MMRpro models). Families at moderate‐high risk for harboring a Lynch‐associated mutation, referred to the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) Hereditary Cancer Program (HCP), underwent mutation analysis, immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite testing. Seventy‐two tested cases were included. Twenty‐five patients were mutation positive (34.7%) and 47 were mutation negative (65.3%). Nineteen of 43 patients who were both microsatellite stable and normal on immunohistochemistry for MLH1 and MSH2 were also genotyped for mutations in these genes; all 19 were negative for MMR gene mutations. Model‐derived probabilities of harboring a MMR gene mutation in the proband were calculated and compared to observed results. The area under the ROC curves were 0.75 (95%CI; 0.63–0.87), 0.86 (0.7–0.96), 0.89 (0.82–0.97), 0.89 (0.81–0.98) and 0.93 (0.86–0.99) for the Myriad, Barnetson, Wijnen, MMRpro and PREMM models, respectively. The Amsterdam II criteria had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.74, respectively, in this cohort. The PREMM model demonstrated the best performance for predicting carrier status based on the positive likelihood ratios at the >10%, >20% and >30% probability thresholds. In this referred cohort, the PREMM model had the most favorable concordance index and predictive performance for carrier status based on the positive LR. These prediction models (PREMM, MMRPro and Wijnen) may soon replace the Amsterdam II and revised Bethesda criteria as a prescreening tool for Lynch mutations.     

Frequency of defective DNA mismatch repair in colorectal cancer among the Alaska Native people.

The frequency of colorectal cancer (CRC) among the Alaska Native people is the highest of any ethnic group in the United States. In this study, CRC from 329 Alaska Native people (165 Eskimo, 111 Indians, and 53 Aleut) were evaluated for evidence of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by testing tumors for altered protein expression (hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6) and for the presence of microsatellite instability. Of the 329 samples tested, 46 (14%) showed both microsatellite instability and altered protein expression; 42 (91%) with a loss of hMLH1, 3 (7%) hMSH2, and 1 (2%) hMLH1/hMSH6. Tumors with loss of hMLH1 were further evaluated for hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and for the presence of the BRAF-V600E mutation. Among cases tested, all 19 (100%) tumors among the Eskimo patients showed hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation, whereas this was the case for only 3 of the 7 (42%) tumors among the Aleut (P=0.002) and 5 of the 10 (50%) tumors from the Indians (P=0.002). The majority of hypermethylated cases (23 of 27) tested positive for the V600E alteration. Of the nine tumors from the Aleut and Indian patients that did not exhibit hMLH1 hypermethylation, eight tested negative for V600E. Overall, the frequency of defective MMR among the three groups was not statistically different (P=0.75). However, the data suggest that the pathogenesis of CRC may differ between the three groups. The CRC with defective MMR among the Eskimo sample fit the typical profile for hMLH1-related cancer associated with sporadic CRC, whereas the pattern in the Aleut and Indian suggests the possibility that germ line hMLH1 mutations may be present.