Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging

The sensitivities of contrast medium-enhanced computed tomography (CT), delayed CT (DCT), CT during arterial portography (CTAP), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detecting focal liver lesions were prospectively evaluated in eight patients who subsequently underwent hepatic lobectomy or transplantation. Pathologic evaluation of the resected liver specimens demonstrated 37 lesions. The sensitivities were 81% (30 of 37 lesions) for CTAP, 57% (21 of 37 lesions) for MR imaging, 52% (12 of 23 lesions) for DCT, and 38% (14 of 37 lesions) for contrast-enhanced CT. The difference between the sensitivity of CTAP and the sensitivities of the other imaging tests was statistically significant (P less than .004). Of the lesions smaller than 1 cm in diameter, CTAP depicted 61% (11 of 18 lesions), MR imaging 17% (three of 18 lesions), CT 0% (zero of 18 lesions), and DCT 0% (zero of nine lesions). It is concluded that for preoperative detection of focal hepatic masses, CTAP is the most accurate technique available to most radiologists. Patients with primary or secondary hepatic neoplasms who are being considered for hepatic resection should undergo CTAP as part of their preoperative examination.     

MR portography: Preliminary comparison with CT portography and conventional MR imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with arterial portography (MRAP) was compared with computed tomography with arterial portography (CTAP) and conventional MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of hepatic masses in eight patients (nine studies). Twenty contiguous, 10-mm-thick-section CTAP images were obtained. MR imaging included T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo and fast multiplanar SPGR (spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state) techniques. For MRAP, 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected into the superior mesenteric artery. Portographic-phase, 8-mm-thick-section, axial SPGR images were first obtained, followed by “systemic phase” SPGR images. Lesions were seen best on the portographic-phase MRAP images and were less conspicuous on the systemic-phase MRAP, CTAP and conventional MR images. Of 19 visualized lesions, 18 were seen with MRAP; however; five subcentimeter lesions seen with MRAP were not seen with conventional MR imaging or CTAP. Systemic recirculation of iodinated contrast material from the bolus and from previous angiography is a potential limitation of CTAP. For both CTAP and MRAP, optimal results are expected if all images are obtained during a single breath hold, within seconds of the onset of contrast agent administration.     

经动脉磁共振门静脉成像的实验研究

目的在犬模型上评价不同的造影动脉、对比剂剂量及血管扩张剂应用与否对经动脉磁共振门静脉成像(MR imaging during arterial portography,MRAP)图像的影响,总结出MRAP的最佳技术参数,为下一步的临床应用做准备.方法健康成犬16条,通过随机化分组表法分配到造影动脉、对比剂剂量及有无血管扩张剂3个研究组中.每条犬行腹腔麻醉后,在X线监视下经股动脉穿刺插管至肠系膜上动脉或脾动脉,行MRAP检查.计算增强前后肝实质信号强度的相对增强值,比较各因素不同水平间的相对增强值之间差异有无统计学意义.分析时间-增强曲线,总结MRAP的最佳技术参数.结果在16条犬上均获得了较为理想的MRAP图像.肠系膜上动脉组肝实质相对增强峰值为29.3%～106.0%,脾动脉组为29.5%～105.0%,肠系膜上动脉组达到肝实质相对增强峰值的时间为24～27 s,而脾动脉组为24～28 s,两组间差异无显著性意义(F=0.03,P>0.05).0.025 mmol/kg组的相对增强峰值为29.3%～30.9%,与0.050 mmol/kg组的95.5%～98.8%,0.100 mmol/kg组的102.0%～106.0%和0.200 mmol/kg组的104.0%～105.0%比较,除后两组之间差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)外,其他各组间差异均有非常显著性意义(P<0.01).有血管扩张剂组达到肝实质相对增强峰值的时间为21～27 s,早于无血管扩张剂组的24～28 s(P<0.05),但两组肝实质相对增强峰值差异无显著性意义(P>0.05).结论 (1)MRAP是一项新的安全可行的肝脏影像学检查技术,20 ml 钆喷替酸葡甲胺(Gd-DTPA)混合液(0.050～0.100 mmol/kg)以1 ml/s注射速度经造影动脉注入,在注射开始后21～28 s即可获得实验动物肝实质的最佳门静脉增强MRAP图像.(2)肠系膜上动脉或脾动脉作为造影动脉,在MRAP影像和时间-增强曲线上无差别.(3)0.050～0.100 mmol/kg的Gd-DTPA剂量完全可以引起肝实质足够的增强(95.5%～106.0%).(4)血管扩张剂的应用并不影响MRAP图像肝实质增强峰值达到的时间和峰值的大小.     

Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of combined contrast-enhanced MR imaging and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography

The aim of this study was to compare Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR images, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images, vs combined CT arterial portography (CTAP) and CT hepatic arteriography (CTHA), in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Twenty-four patients with 38 nodular HCCs (5–60 mm, mean 23.0 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. Image reviews were conducted on a liver segment-by-segment basis. A total of 192 segments, including 36 segments with 38 HCC, were reviewed independently by three radiologists. Each radiologist read four sets of images (set 1, unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images; set 2, unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MR images; set 3, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images; set 4, combined CTAP and CTHA). To minimize any possible learning bias, the reviewing order was randomized and the reviewing procedure was performed in four sessions at 2-week intervals. The diagnostic accuracy (A_z values) for HCCs of combined CTAP and CTHA, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images, Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images, and SPIO-enhanced MR images for all observers were 0.934, 0.963, 0.878, and 0.869, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of combined CTAP and CTHA and combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images was significantly higher than Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images or SPIO-enhanced MR images (p<0.005). The mean specificity of combined CTAP and CTHA (93%) and combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images (95%) was significantly higher than Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images (87%) or SPIO-enhanced MR images (88%; p<0.05). Combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images may obviate the need for more invasive combined CTAP and CTHA for the preoperative evaluation of patients with HCC.     

Hepatic tumors: dynamic MR imaging

Thirty-six patients with hepatic tumors (28 hepatocellular carcinomas, seven cavernous hemangiomas, one metastatic tumor) were examined with serial magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, after a bolus intravenous injection of 0.05 mmol/kg gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. A typical MR imaging pattern for hemangiomas (present in five of seven cases [71.4%]) was a lesion of diminished signal intensity on precontrast images, peripheral contrast enhancement during the bolus dynamic phase, and complete fill-in of high signal intensity on delayed scan images. Twenty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas showed a variety of contrast enhancement patterns during the dynamic phase. In 21 patients (75%), there was no area of high signal intensity within the tumor on the delayed phase. A peripheral halo with delayed enhancement was noticed in 12 patients (42.8%) Histologic correlation in hepatocellular carcinomas showed that the degree of contrast enhancement corresponded to tumor vascularity and that the peripheral halo corresponded to fibrous capsular structure.     

Hepatic metastases: randomized, controlled comparison of detection with MR imaging and CT

To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging relative to computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of liver metastases, a randomized, controlled study was conducted of 135 subjects, including 57 with cancer metastatic to the liver, 27 with benign cysts or hemangiomas, and 51 without focal liver disease. The sensitivity of MR imaging for detecting individual metastatic deposits was 64%, significantly greater than 51% for CT (P less than .001); the difference in sensitivity for identifying patients with one or more hepatic metastases was less (82% for MR imaging vs. 80% for CT). In patients without hepatic metastases, the specificity of MR imaging was 99% versus 94% for CT. Significant differences were found between individual MR pulse sequences in detection of individual lesions. The sensitivity of both T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) (64%) and inversion-recovery (IR) (65%) pulse sequences was significantly (P less than .001) greater than either the TE (echo time) 60 msec (43%) or TE 120 msec (43%) T2-weighted pulse sequences. Overall, the accuracy of a single T1-weighted (10-minute) pulse sequence was superior to that of contrast-enhanced CT.     

CT during arterial portography: diagnostic pitfalls.

Computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography (CTAP) is an important technique for evaluating the liver before hepatic tumor resection. With this technique, most tumors are of low attenuation compared with that of enhancing parenchyma. At times, low-attenuation lesions are encountered that represent perfusion abnormalities rather than tumor deposits. These perfusion abnormalities can be categorized as (a) those resulting from improper technique; (b) those extending from hilum to capsule (straight-line sign), with or without an obstructing mass; (c) perihilar and periligamentous abnormalities; (d) subcapsular defects (linear or wedge shaped); and (e) those seen with cirrhosis or regenerating nodules. Adjuvant use of delayed CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoperative ultrasound aids in characterization of these nontumorous defects, thereby improving specificity. The authors conclude that when potential candidates are evaluated for hepatic tumor resection, knowledge of the existence of the various diagnostic pitfalls of CTAP and their imaging characteristics is imperative to avoid inadvertent false results.     

Liver metastases: comparison of current MR techniques and spiral CT during arterial portography for detection in 20 surgically staged cases.

PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) with current magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including hepatic arterial-dominant phase, gadolinium-enhanced, spoiled gradient-echo imaging, for the prospective detection of liver metastases in 20 patients who subsequently underwent surgery to confirm findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients underwent spiral CTAP and MR imaging within 1 week. Spiral CTAP and MR images were interpreted separately in blinded fashion. All patients subsequently had intraoperative confirmation. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for lesion detection and segmental distribution. RESULTS: CTAP and MR images demonstrated, respectively, 54 and 60 true-positive lesions, six and one false-positive lesions, 15 and 22 true-negative (i.e., benign) lesions, and eight and two false-negative lesions. CTAP and MR images demonstrated, respectively, 57 and 62 true-positive segmental involvements, six and one false-positive segmental involvements, 89 and 95 true-negative segmental involvements, and eight and two false-negative segmental involvements. No significant difference in lesion detection was observed. CONCLUSION: Spiral CTAP and MR imaging were approximately equivalent for lesion detection in patients who were evaluated preoperatively for resection of liver metastases. The lower cost and fewer problems with artifacts may suggest that MR imaging is the preferred modality for preoperative assessment of patients for surgical treatment of liver metastases.     

Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up

PURPOSE: To describe the appearance of hepatic tumors treated with radio-frequency (RF) ablation on computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images and the pattern of residual tumor at the site of RF ablation and to assess prospectively the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive CT and MR imaging values in the evaluation of RF treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 50 tumors (nine hepatocellular carcinomas and 41 metastases) treated with RF ablation underwent CT and MR imaging on the same day at 2, 4, and 6 months; CT was performed every 3 months thereafter. CT and MR findings were interpreted separately and prospectively by two reviewers with consensus. For both imaging techniques, appearance of the treated area, treatment efficacy, and complications were assessed at each time. Sensitivity and specificity were determined by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 19 months, nine tumors showed local regrowth. At 2 months, MR imaging depicted more local regrowths (eight of nine; sensitivity, 89%) than did CT (four of nine; sensitivity, 44%) but without significant differences (P =.12). In two cases, only T2-weighted imaging depicted local regrowth. All nine lesions became conspicuous at 4-month follow-up with both techniques. At 2 months, thin peripheral rim enhancement and arterioportal shunting were found in 24% and 12%, respectively, of the treated tumors. These findings disappeared thereafter and are not linked to tumor regrowth. CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of patients, CT and MR imaging may depicted all local regrowth at 4 months or sooner. MR imaging may have an edge over CT in the early detection of local regrowth.     

Nerve sheath tumors: evaluation with CT and MR imaging.

Tumors of nerves are classified into benign (schwannoma and neurofibroma) and malignant nerve sheath tumors. Schwannomas almost always occur as solitary lesions, whereas neurofibromas may occur alone or in a greater number, especially in patients with the peripheral form of von Recklinghausen's disease. Benign nerve sheath tumors often present as asymptomatic, slowly growing soft tissue masses. Although malignant nerve sheath tumors are relatively rare, a sudden increase in the size of a lesion, in particular in a patient with neurofibromatosis, should raise the suspicion of malignant change. On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) a benign nerve sheath tumor usually appears as a well-defined, oval, spherical or fusiform mass with smooth borders and distinct outlines, located in the subcutaneous tissue or centered at the expected anatomic location of a nerve, with displacement of adjacent soft tissues. Generally nerve sheath tumors have a low density on unenhanced CT scans. On MR they are isointense to muscle on T1-weighted images, whereas on T2-weighted images the signal intensity is high. Both on CT and MR the degree of contrast enhancement is moderate to marked and may be homogeneous or inhomogeneous. MR has become the method of choice for evaluating the anatomic location, contour, and relation of a nerve sheath tumor to adjacent neural, vascular, and muscular structures. The imaging criteria for malignant nerve sheath tumors are not specific enough to distinguish them from other malignant soft tissue tumors, so that neither CT nor MR can establish a definite diagnosis.     

Lipomatous tumors and tumors with fatty component: MR imaging potential and comparison of MR and CT results

This retrospective study was performed to assess the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for demonstrating various types of lipomatous tumors and tumors with fatty component and to compare the results of MR with those of computed tomography (CT). MR examinations of 17 patients with 18 lipomatous tumors (16, benign; two, liposarcoma) and two patients with fibrosarcomas were reviewed; CT scans were available for comparison in all patients. In the 16 benign lesions (12 benign lipomas, two ovarian dermoid cysts, and two renal angiomyolipomas), the fatty component of the tumors was readily demonstrated by both MR and CT. The T1 and T2 relaxation times and spin density of benign lipomatous tumors were in a range similar to those of normal subcutaneous fat. Differentiation between lipomas and liposarcomas was achieved with both MR and CT. On MR images using a short repetition time (TR = .5 sec), liposarcomas (long T1) were imaged with a lower MR intensity than lipomas (short T1).