Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high mortality rates. Data has shown that intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support does not provide a survival benefit over optimal medical therapy in AMICS. Despite lack of supportive evidence, IABP is still commonly used in these clinical situations. The Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) (Abiomed, Denver, MA) rapidly deploys superior mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with AMICS. However, the safety and efficacy of Impella in AMICS is a matter of ongoing investigation, and its role in AMICS management is not yet fully established.MethodsThe databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to March 2020. Relevant randomized trials and observational studies comparing Impella versus IABP in AMICS were identified and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. The efficacy endpoint of interest was short-term mortality (defined as in-hospital or 30-day mortality). The safety endpoints of interest were major bleeding, limb complications, stroke and hemolysis.ResultsA total of 2 randomized trials and 5 observational studies with 3921 patients were included. No difference in short-term mortality between the two groups [RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87–1.33, P = 0.49] was found. For safety endpoints, Impella was associated with significantly higher incidence of major bleeding [RR: 2.03, 95% CI 1.56–2.64, P < 0.0001], limb complications [RR: 3.67, 95% CI 1.56–8.65, P = 0.003] as well as hemolysis [RR: 9.46, 95% CI 1.75–51.22, P = 0.009] compared with IABP. No significant difference was observed for the incidence of stroke [RR: 1.07 95% CI 0.34–3.31 P = 0.91].ConclusionImpella support in AMICS patients was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding, limb complications and hemolysis without an improved short-term survival advantage compared with IABP.     

Impact of administration of nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:In order to provide new evidence-based medical evidence for clinical treatment, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.Methods:This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently will search randomized controlled trials or observational studies about the treatment of nicorandil on AMI patients. Retrieved databases include Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. And retrieval time is limited from inception to June 2021. Key words are nicorandil, myocardial infarction, or similar expansion words without publication limitation. Biomechanical studies, in vitro studies, review articles, techniques, case reports, letters to the editor, and editorials are excluded.Results:The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria and the review will add to the existing literature by showing compelling evidence and improved guidance in clinic settings.OSF registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/UEPKB.     

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Previous studies comparing the published literature on drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) have drawn divergent conclusions, as these studies are limited by small sample sizes. To overcome these limitations, we thus conducted a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of DCB versus DES for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It was hypothesized that DCB use at the AMI is associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular disease and death.Methods:The electronic databases Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cinahl were searched from the earliest available date until August 2021. Study included in our study had to meet all of the following inclusion criteria: all randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of DES versus DCB in the treatment of AMI were considered eligible for analysis; participants received DCB or DES; reporting the available data on cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis. Review Manager Software (v 5.3; Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the meta-analysis. Two of us independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using parameters defined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions criteria.Results:It was hypothesized that DCB use at the AMI is associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular disease and death.Registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/AVTYW.     

ECMO and Short-term Support for Cardiogenic Shock in Heart Failure

Purpose of Review

This review aims to discuss the role of ECMO in the treatment of cardiogenic shock in heart failure.

Recent Findings

Trials done previously have shown that IABP does not improve survival in cardiogenic shock compared to medical treatment, and that neither Impella 2.5 nor TandemHeart improves survival compared to IABP. The “IMPRESS in severe shock” trial compared Impella CP with IABP and found no difference in survival. A meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing ECMO with IABP showed 33% improved 30-day survival with ECMO (risk difference 33%; 95% CI 14–52%; p =?0.0008; NNT 3).

Summary

ECMO is indicated in medically refractory cardiogenic shock. ECMO can be considered in cardiogenic shock patients with estimated mortality of more than 50%. ECMO is probably the MCS of choice in cardiogenic shock with; biventricular failure, respiratory failure, life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac arrest.

     

Intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock,efficiency, safety and mortality risk factors

Background and methodsCardiogenic shock remains one of the leading causes of death in patients with myocardial infarction. The Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been widely used as a treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), despite recommendations against its routine use. In this paper, our aim is to analyze and share our own experience with IABP in the setting of AMI. We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients admitted with AMI and cardiogenic shock and for whom IABP was inserted between June 2016 and December 2022.Results300 patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock were admitted and benefited from IABP insertion and primary coronary revascularization. The overall mortality rate was 62.3%, the site related complication rate was 0.6%, and the overall complications rate (including site related and major bleeding) was 10.6%. There was a significantly higher mortality in the group of patients where the Left Anterior Descending artery (LAD) was the culprit lesion, in the group of patients who required dialysis, the group who had creatinine levels greater than 200 um/L compared to the group who had creatinine lower than 200 um/L, and in patients older than 70 years. Interestingly, no difference in mortality was observed between men and women, single versus multiple vessel disease, and between STEMI and non-STEMI patients.ConclusionMortality of AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and treated by IABP remains high. However, IABP usage is associated with a low complication rate. Better selection criteria for IABP usage versus other more powerful mechanical circulatory support devices in such patients might improve the outcome for the patient.     

Efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:There are no meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.Methods:We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration to conduct this meta-analysis. Reviewers will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE online databases for all English-language cohort studies published up to April, 2021. The cohort studies focusing on assess the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of AMI will be included in our meta-analysis. At least one of the following outcomes should have been measured: reduced infarct size, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, adverse events, death and major cardiovascular events. Review Manager software will be used for the meta-analysis. All outcomes are pooled on random-effect model. A P value of <.05 is considered to be statistically significant.Results:Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.Registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/NTU5F.     

Effects of continuous use of metformin on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:To our knowledge, no meta-analyses or reviews have investigated the efficacy and safety of metformin on cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We thus conduct a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin on cardiovascular outcomes after AMI in patients with T2DM.Methods:In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will search PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through April, 2021. The study is structured to adhere to PRISMA guidelines (i.e., Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessments are conducted independently by 2 authors. Outcome measures include all-cause mortality; complications such as acute kidney injury, lactic acidosis, hospitalization for AMI or stroke, or death. Where disagreement in the collection of data occurs, this is resolved through discussion. Review Manager Software (v 5.3; Cochrane Collaboration) is used for the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers will assess the risk of bias of the included studies at study level.Results:It is hypothesized that metformin use at the post-AMI is associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular disease and death in patients with T2DM.Conclusions:This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of metformin on cardiovascular outcomes after AMI in patients with T2DM.Registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/S3MBP.     

Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support Used Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock From ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundOptimal timing to initiate mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear with studies showing conflicting results on whether to start before or after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aims to examine the association between mortality and MCS initiated before vs after PPCI in patients with STEMI complicated by CS.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for abstracts and full-text articles from inception to October 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated the association of mortality in patients who initiated MCS (specifically intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)) before PPCI versus after PPCI, specifically in patients with STEMI complicated by CS. Data were integrated using the random-effects models.ResultsTen studies involving 1,352 patients (956, 203, and 193 patients underwent IABP, Impella, and VA-ECMO respectively) with STEMI complicated by CS were included. There was no difference in mortality using IABP before or after PPCI ([OR] 1.77, 95% CI 0.77–1.61, I2 = 27%, p = 0.57). Nevertheless, Impella and VA-ECMO started before PPCI were significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality compared to that started after PPCI ([OR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.92, I2 = 0%, p = 0.03 and [OR] 0.29, 95% CI 0.14–0.62, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI complicated by CS undergoing PPCI, the use of IMPELLA or VA-ECMO prior to PPCI significantly decreased mortality, in contrast to IABP, in which no difference in mortality was found between using it before or after PPCI. More rigorous studies are needed to clarify this association.     

Efficacy and feasibility of deep brain stimulation for patients with depression: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Previous meta-analyses have examined the clinical efficacy and acceptability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) compared with sham therapy or paired active therapy. However, the absence of head-to-head clinical trials with some treatment comparisons creates uncertainty for decision makers. Thus, to provide new evidence-based medical evidence for clinical treatment, we undertook a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of DBS in patients with depression based on high-quality randomized controlled studies.Methods:The protocol was written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement guidelines. PubMed/Medline and EMBASE will be searched before May 2021 for all studies, using various combinations of the following free text and key terms: deep brain stimulation; depression; random. No language restrictions will be applied. The method of data extraction will follow the approach outlined by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Review Manager software 5.3 is used for the meta-analysis. The quality of randomized trials will be assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials.Results:The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria and the review will add to the existing literature by showing compelling evidence and improved guidance in clinic settings.OSF registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/Q5B3S.     

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of aspirin combination treatment in treating patients with coronary heart disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Coronary heart disease (CHD) has a high incidence rate as a cardiovascular condition, primarily affecting the elderly and middle-aged individuals. CHD has debilitating effects on the standard of life of the elderly, and affecting their physical and psychological health. Reportedly, using aspirin alone is less effective as a first line of treatment for CHD. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis will synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and safeness of aspirin combination treatment in treating patients with CHD.Methods:A comprehensive meta-analysis is to be performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aspirin combination treatment for CHD patients. A search will be performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, WanFang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure till December 25, 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials, assess all related studies on the aspirin combination treatment in treating patients with CHD. In this systematic review, we will adopt the second version of Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool to assess the bias risk in all studies that fulfil the eligibility conditions. Two authors will separately conduct the study selection process, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Moreover, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted to synthesize evidence for all outcomes. Provided there is sufficient homogeneity among the studies, we will perform meta-analysis. I ² test will be employed to assess the heterogeneity of the outcomes.OSF registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/MDTCA     

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Post–Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome.MethodsA systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases.ResultsOf 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I² = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I² = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy.ConclusionsThe current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO.     

Single- or dual-antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe evidence related to bleeding and thromboembolic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) treatment are inconsistent. Moreover, there are some limitations such as small sample size and the risk of bias in existing studies. We will conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the safety and efficacy of SAPT or DAPT after TAVR.MethodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched to retrieve studies involving SAPT versus DAPT after TAVR. Two investigators will independently select studies, extract data, and assess the quality of the included study. Any disagreement will be resolved by the third investigator. The study will use a random-effects model to pool the results of all studies and use the relative risk and 95% confidence intervals to summarize individual trial outcomes and estimate pooled effect. The study will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the certainty of evidence.ResultsThis study will provide high-quality evidence for treatment of TAVR in terms of effectiveness and safety.ConclusionThis systematic review aims to provide evidence for treatment of TAVR in different antiplatelet therapies.RegistrationThe systematic review and meta-analysis is registered in the OSF REGISTRIES (10.17605/OSF.IO/Q42TE) international prospective register.     

Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundLeft ventricular unloading with Impella may improve survival outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). However, the optimal timing to initiate left ventricular unloading has yet to be established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare survival in patients with AMI-CS who were supported with Impella prior to PCI (pre-PCI) to those in whom support was initiated following PCI (post-PCI).MethodsAll studies that evaluated the impact of pre-PCI versus post-PCI Impella placement in patients with AMI-CS were included. Primary endpoints included in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month survival rates.ResultsWe identified five observational studies comparing outcomes in 432 patients with AMI-CS, of which 173 patients were treated with Impella pre-PCI and 259 patients post-PCI. Patients in the pre-PCI group had lower in-hospital mortality compared to patients in the post-PCI group (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50–0.76, I² = 0%). The lower mortality rate in the pre-PCI group remained evident at 30 days (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47–0.78, I² = 0%) and at 6 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44–0.97, I² = 0%). There was no difference in the risk of adverse events including reinfarction, stroke, major bleeding, acute ischemic limb, access site bleeding, and hemolysis.ConclusionsIn this meta-analysis of studies evaluating survival among AMI-CS patients with left ventricular unloading initiated pre- versus post-PCI, Impella placement prior to PCI was associated with improved survival.     

Acupoint catgut embedding therapy for functional constipation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:This review will assess current evidence related to the effectiveness and safety of acupoint catgut embedding therapy for functional constipation (FC) and provide efficacy assessments for clinical applications.Methods:We will search the following databases for relevant trials: PubMed, EMBASE OVID, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, OVID MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane library, and Scopus. We will also search the following Chinese databases for trials published in the Chinese literature: China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Wan Fang Database, Chinese Biomedicine and other resources from inception to December 2020. Only randomized controlled trials comparing acupoint catgut embedding versus acupuncture or sham acupuncture or placebo or other therapies will be included. The outcomes involved mean spontaneous bowel movements, complete spontaneous bowel movements, the Bristol Stool Form Scale, the Cleveland Clinic Score, Patient Assessment of Constipation symptom and so on. The risk of bias assessment and quality of evidence for outcomes will be appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. RevMan 5.3 software will be employed for the meta-analysis.Results:This work will compare and arrange the comparative efficacy of acupoint catgut embedding with different treatments for FC by summarizing the current evidences.Conclusion:The results of this meta-analysis may help doctors determine the best treatments for patients to manage FC.Ethics and dissemination:This is a protocol with no patient recruitment and personal information collection, approval by the ethics committee is not required.OSF Registration number:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/XTKE2.     

Calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:Evidence suggesting a role for including calcineurin inhibitors(CNIs) in early therapy remains limited for low quality and mainly based on small observation cohort study. We will conduct a systematic reviews to explore the effect and adverse effect of calcineurin inhibitors compared with other interventions in the treatment of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).Methods:A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be conducted. Two investigators will independently select studies, extract data and assess the quality of the included study. Extracted information will include study characteristics, the contents of included randomized controlled trials, outcomes, the quality of randomized controlled trials and etc. A risk of bias tool will be used to assess the methodological quality. Any disagreement will be resolved by the third investigator. There is no requirement of ethical approval and informed consent.Results:This study will provide high-quality evidence for treatment of FSGS in terms of effectiveness and safety.Conclusion:This systematic review aims to provide evidence for treatment of FSGS in different CNIs.Registration:The systematic review and meta-analysis is registered in the OSF REGISTERS (10.17605/OSF.IO/3B7DE) international prospective register of systematic review.     

Traditional Chinese medicine Jianpi therapy in exercise-induced fatigue: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Exercise-induced fatigue (EIF) is a common occurrence in sports competition and training. It may cause trouble to athletes’ motor skill execution and cognition. Although traditional Chinese medicine Jianpi therapy has been commonly used for EIF management, relevant evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Jianpi therapy is still unclear.Methods:Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang will be searched for relevant randomized controlled trials from databases from 2000 to 2021. Randomized controlled trials related to traditional Chinese medicine Jianpi therapy in the treatment and management of EIF will be included. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the data will be performed in RevMan 5.3 according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors independently performed the literature searching, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized clinical trials.Results:This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the latest evidence for traditional Chinese medicine Jianpi therapy in EIF. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal once completed.Conclusion:The conclusion of our research will provide evidence to support traditional Chinese medicine Jianpi therapy as an effective intervention for patients with EIF.OSF Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NRKX4.     

Hypothermia therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the role of systemic therapeutic hypothermia remains controversial. We performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of systemic therapeutic hypothermia in patients with AMI receiving PCI.Methods:This study will use the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database, and Ongoing Clinical Trials Database. The search terms were hypothermia, cooling, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia and acute coronary syndrome. Quality assessment of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.Results:The findings of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.Conclusion:This systematic review will provide evidence to determine whether hypothermia therapy is an effective and safe intervention for patients with AMI receiving PCI.Registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XJSB.     

The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with AMI. Although several studies have demonstrated the importance of establishing and maintaining a patent infarct-related artery, it remains unclear as to whether intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) provides incremental benefit to reperfusion therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether IABP use is associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in a large AMI registry. METHODS: We evaluated patients participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 who had cardiogenic shock at initial examination or in whom cardiogenic shock developed during hospitalization (n = 23,180). RESULTS: The mean age of patients in the study was 72 years, 54% were men, and the majority were white. The overall mortality rate in all patients who had cardiogenic shock or in whom cardiogenic shock developed was 70%. IABP was used in 7268 (31%) patients. IABP use was associated with a significant reduction in mortality rates in patients who received thrombolytic therapy (67% vs 49%) but was not associated with any benefit in patients treated with primary angioplasty (45% vs 47%). In a multivariate model, the use of IABP in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy decreased the odds of death by 18% (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock may have substantial benefit from IABP when used in combination with thrombolytic therapy.     

Effect and safety of traditional Chinese exercises for patients with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background:Traditional Chinese exercises are more and more popular for type 2 diabetes patients for the treatment and rehabilitation; however, the comparative effectiveness and safety remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the pros and cons of these exercise interventions for type 2 diabetes by implementing a network meta-analysis.Methods:Eight databases will be searched for relevant systematic reviews including SinoMed, VIP, CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to Oct 2021. Randomized controlled trials that meeting eligibility in published systematic reviews will be identified. Randomized controlled trial related to Traditional Chinese Exercises or Qigong therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes will be included. Two researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. Network meta-analysis of the data was performed by Stata 14.0. The Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be used to evaluate the rank of evidence.Results:The findings will be reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses- network meta-analysis statement. This systematic review and network meta-analysis will summarize the direct and indirect evidence for different kinds of traditional Chinese exercises therapies and to rank these interventions. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal once completed.Conclusion:The network meta-analysis was designed to update and expand on previous research results of clinical trials to better evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different interventions of traditional Chinese exercises for type 2 diabetes patients.OSF Registration DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/MNJD6.     

Comparison of cyclophosphamide and calcineurin inhibitors for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the leading causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. We performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide (CTX) with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the treatment of IMN.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 3 Chinese databases (WanFang Data, Chongqing VIP and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched from inception through January 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CTX with CNIs for patients with IMN. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the data will be performed in RevMan software (version 5.3) according to the preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Two authors independently performed the literature searching, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials.Results:The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal once completed.Conclusion:The conclusion of our research will provide evidence to help physicians to decide between CTX and CNIs therapy regimens for IMN patients.Open Science Framework registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/G584K