The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the role of duplex scanning in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE), the correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score with the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and patients who may benefit from surveillance duplex scanning. METHODS: Age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), VTE score, length of stay, diagnoses, and bleeding risk were recorded from the trauma registry in patients who had a duplex scan from 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: There were 1,513 duplex scans obtained (10,141 trauma admissions), 253 (2.5%) cases of DVT (52% above-knee, 8% upper extremity), and 30 cases of PE (0.3%). Only 5 of 21 duplex scans were positive in PE patients. DVT patients were older (52.9 vs. 46.7 years), with higher ISS (24.0 vs. 20.8) than patients without DVT. Regression analysis showed poor correlation between VTE score and DVT incidence (r2 = 0.27). Univariate analysis identified age, ISS, and VTE score as risk predictors for DVT. CONCLUSION: Adherence to an evidence-based VTE prophylaxis protocol is more important than surveillance duplex scanning in preventing VTE in trauma patients.     

Utility of Once-Daily Dose of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Multisystem Trauma Patients

Introduction Venous thromboembolism is a preventable cause of death in the severely injured patient. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been recommended as effective, safe prophylactic agents. However, LMWH use remains controversial in patients at risk for bleeding, those with traumatic brain injury, and those undergoing multiple invasive or operative procedures. We hypothesized that a protocol utilizing once-daily LMWH prophylaxis in high-risk trauma patients, regardless of the need for invasive procedures, is feasible, safe, and effective. Methods From August 1998 to August 2000, all patients admitted to our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma facility following injury were evaluated for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) risk and prospectively followed. Patients at high risk for DVT, including those with stable intracranial injuries, were placed on our institutional protocol and prospectively followed. Patients on the protocol received daily injections of the LMWH, dalteparin; DVT screening was performed with duplex ultrasonography within 48 hours of admission and after 7 to 10 days after injury. Regimen compliance, bleeding complications, DVT rates, and pulmonary embolus (PE) rates were analyzed. Results During the 2-year study period, 6247 trauma patients were admitted; 743 were considered at high risk for DVT. Most of the patients were men (72%), with a mean age of 38.7 years (range 15–89 years) and a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 19.5. Compliance with the daily regimen was maintained in 74% of patients. DVT was detected in 3.9% and PE in 0.8%. The wound complications rate was 2.7%, and the need for unexplained transfusions was 3%. There were no exacerbations of head injury following dalteparin initiation due to bleeding. There were 16 patient deaths; none was caused by PE or late hemorrhage. Conclusions Once-daily dosing of prophylactic LMWH dalteparin is feasible, safe, and effective in high-risk trauma patients. Our protocol allows one to “operate through” systemic prophylaxis and ensures timely prophylaxis for brain-injured and multisystem trauma patients.     

The incidence of thromboembolism in the surgical intensive care unit

The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is unreliable. Studies have been performed examining the utility of frequent duplex scans. However, these studies included patients outside of the intensive care unit. The incidence of venous thromboembolism and the effect of a less intense surveillance protocol was prospectively examined at a level-1 urban trauma center for a 6 month period. During the study period there were 726 admission to the surgical intensive care unit. Sequential compression devices (SCDs) were used for DVT prophylaxis in 93 per cent of the admissions. A total of 114 duplex scans were ordered: 42 per cent for surveillance and the rest for evaluation of a clinical indication. Twelve DVTs were discovered (11% overall DVT rate). No patient on subcutaneous heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin developed a DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). Four patients suffered a PE; however, none were found to have a lower extremity DVT on duplex ultrasound and all received SCD prophylaxis. Overall, proper use of DVT prophylaxis for intensive care unit days 1-14 was 77 per cent. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in a group of patients at overall high risk was low. A program of DVT surveillance with duplex ultrasound was not cost-effective.     

Routine prophylactic vena cava filtration is not indicated after acute spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating problem, with over 10,000 new cases annually. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-recognized risk in SCI patients, although no clear recommendations for prophylaxis exist. We therefore evaluated whether routine placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters is indicated in SCI patients. METHODS: The trauma registry of a regional trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining acute SCI resulting in tetraplegia or paraplegia after blunt or penetrating trauma for a 5-year period beginning in January 1995. Patients were analyzed for demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, associated long bone or pelvic fracture, severe closed-head injury, type of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, level of SCI, and incidence of DVT and PE. DVT prophylaxis was performed in all patients with sequential compression devices (SCDs) when extremity fracture status permitted. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD and analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 8,269 admissions during the study period, with an overall incidence of DVT and PE of 11.8% and 0.9%, respectively. There were 111 (1.3%) patients who sustained SCI, with an incidence of DVT and PE of 9.0% and 1.8%, respectively, and no deaths. Of these 111 patients, 41.4% were paraplegics and 58.6% were tetraplegics, and 17.1% of patients had severe closed-head injury. Mean hospital length of stay was 23 +/- 20 days for SCI patients. Surveillance duplex ultrasound was performed an average of 2.3 +/- 2.1 times during each hospitalization. Mean Injury Severity Score was 30.0 +/- 12.2. The incidence of DVT and PE in those patients with SCDs alone was 7.1% and 2.3%; for SCDs plus subcutaneous heparin, the incidence was 11.1% and 2.8%; and for SCDs plus low-molecular-weight heparin, the incidence was 7.4% and 0%, respectively, with no statistical difference between groups. The incidence of DVT in SCI patients with long bone fractures was 37.5%, which was significantly greater than the total SCI population (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT and PE in SCI patients was similar to that of the overall trauma population when appropriate DVT prophylaxis was used. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that SCI associated with long bone fracture significantly increases the incidence of DVT. On the basis of the low incidence of PE in the present study, routine placement of prophylactic caval filters does not appear warranted in all SCI patients. However, SCI patients with long bone fractures, patients with DVT formation despite prophylactic anticoagulation, or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation may be appropriate candidates for prophylactic caval filtration.     

Thromboembolism following multiple trauma.

The true incidence of thromboembolic complications following multiple trauma is unknown, and no method of prophylaxis has been shown to be both safe and effective in managing seriously injured patients. In this prospective study, 113 trauma patients were assigned on admission to receive either low-dose heparin (LDH), (5,000 U subcutaneously every 12 hours) or to wear sequential compression devices (SCDs) as prophylaxis against the development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Both groups of patients were serially studied with duplex venous ultrasound imaging to detect thrombus in the veins of the thigh. Ventilation-perfusion lung scans and pulmonary angiograms were performed when pulmonary embolism (PE) was suspected clinically. There were 12 patients who had thromboembolic complications, including 9 of 76 in the SCD group (12%) and 3 of 37 in the LDH group (8%). Five patients had DVT only, four had PE without detectable DVT, and three had both DVT and PE. None of the patients with PE died, and there were no major complications associated with either method of prophylaxis. Compared with the patients who did not develop DVT/PE, those with thromboembolic complications were older (49 +/- 23 vs. 36 +/- 17 years, p less than 0.02), spent more hospital days immobilized (24 +/- 15 vs. 10 +/- 13 days, p less than 0.001), received more transfusions (11 +/- 12 vs. 3 +/- 5 U, p less than 0.001) and had clotting abnormalities on admission, as demonstrated by prolonged PTT values (39 +/- 28 vs. 26 +/- 5 seconds, p less than 0.001). It appears that there is an identifiable subgroup of injured patients at highest risk for PE who warrant both prophylaxis and close surveillance for DVT.     

A potentially expanded role for enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in high risk blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after trauma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of enoxaparin in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after injury in patients who are at high risk for developing VTE. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-cohort observational study was initiated for seriously injured blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period. Patients were eligible for the study if time hospitalized was > or = 72 hours, Injury Severity Score (ISS) was > or = 9, enoxaparin was started within 24 hours after admission, and one or more of the following high risk criteria were met: age > 50 years, ISS > or = 16, presence of a femoral vein catheter, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) > or = 3 for any body region, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score < or = 8, presence of major pelvic, femur, or tibia fracture, and presence of direct blunt mechanism venous injury. Patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries were also potential participants. The primary outcomes measured were thromboembolic events--either a documented lower extremity DVT by duplex color-flow doppler ultrasonography or a PE documented by rapid infusion CT pulmonary angiography or conventional pulmonary angiography. RESULTS: There were 118 patients enrolled in the study. Two patients (2%) developed DVT, one of which was proximal to the calf (95% confidence interval, 0% to 6%). Two of 12 patients (17%) with splenic injuries who received enoxaparin failed initial nonoperative management. There were no other bleeding complications, and no clinical evidence or documented episodes of PE. One patient died from multiple system organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is a practical and effective method for reducing the incidence of VTE in high risk, seriously injured patients. This study supports further investigation into the safety of enoxaparin prophylaxis in patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries.     

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: an overstatement of the problem?

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) affect high-risk trauma patients (HRTP). Accurate incidence and clinical importance of DVT and PE in HRPT may be overstated. We performed a ten-year retrospective analysis of HRTP of the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study. High-risk factors (HRF) included pelvic fracture (PFx), lower extremity fracture (LEFx), severe head injury (CHI) (AIS - head > or =3), and spinal cord injury. HRF alone or in combination, age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) were examined for association with DVT/PE. A total of 73,419 HRTP were included: 1377 (1.9%) had DVT, 365 (0.5%) had PE. The incidence of DVT in level I trauma centers was 2.2 per cent and was 1.5 per cent in level II centers. The lowest incidence of DVT was 1.3 per cent for isolated LEFx; highest was 5.4% for combined PFx, LEFx, and CHI. Variables associated with DVT included age, ISS, and GCS (all P < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, only ISS was consistently predictive for DVT and PE. Though increased during the past decade, the overall incidence of DVT in HRTP remains below 3 per cent. Only the combination of multiple injuries or an ISS >30 result in DVT incidence of > or =5 per cent. We believe that current guidelines for screening for DVT may need to be reevaluated.     

Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma

OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple trauma often have injuries that preclude the use of anticoagulation therapy or sequential compression device prophylaxis. Temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (IVCFs) offer protection against pulmonary embolism during the early immediate injury and perioperative period, when risk is highest, while averting potential long-term sequelae of permanent IVCFs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under real-time intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in patients with multiple trauma. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-four patients with multiple trauma seen between July 1, 2002, and November 1, 2003, underwent placement of OptEase (Cordis Endovascular) retrievable IVCFs under real-time IVUS guidance. Mean (+/-SD) Injury Severity Score was 25.1 +/- 2.2). Abdominal x-ray films were obtained in all patients to verify filter location. Before IVCF retrieval all patients underwent femoral vein color-flow ultrasound scanning to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pre-procedure and post-procedure vena cavography to identify possible IVCF thrombus entrapment and post-retrieval inferior vena cava injury. RESULTS: Nineteen patients died of their injuries; no deaths were related to IVCF placement. One pulmonary embolism occurred during follow-up after filter retrieval, and 1 insertion site femoral vein DVT occurred. As verified on abdominal x-ray films, 96.8% (91 of 94) of IVCFs were placed without complications at the L2-3 level. Filter-related complications included 2 groin hematomas (2.1%) and 3 IVCFs misplaced in the right iliac vein (3.2%), early in our experience; the filters were uneventfully retrieved and replaced in the inferior vena cava within 24 hours. Thirty-one patients underwent uneventful retrieval of IVCFs after DVT or pulmonary embolism anticoagulation prophylaxis was initiated. Forty-four filters were not removed, 41 because severity of injury prevented DVT or pulmonary embolism prophylaxis and 3 because of thrombus trapped within the filter. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under IVUS guidance in patients with multiple trauma is simple and safe, and serves as an effective "bridge" to anticoagulation therapy until venous thromboembolism prophylaxis can be initiated. Further investigation of this bedside technique and the role of temporary IVCFs in patients with multiple trauma is warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with multiple trauma often have injuries that preclude the use of anticoagulation therapy or sequential compression device prophylaxis. Temporary inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) offer protection against pulmonary embolism during the perioperative and immediate injury period, when risk is highest. Ninety-four patients with multiple trauma underwent prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under real-time intravascular ultrasound. One pulmonary embolism occurred during follow-up after filter retrieval, and 1 insertion site femoral vein deep venous thrombosis occurred. Ninety-one of 94 IVCFs (96.8%) were placed without complication. Thirty-one patients underwent uneventful retrieval of IVCFs after anticoagulation prophylaxis was initiated. Forty-four filters were not removed, because of severity of injury (n = 41) or because of trapped thrombus within the filter (n = 3). Prophylactic, temporary IVCFs placed under intravascular ultrasound guidance at the bedside in patients with multiple trauma is simple, safe, and an effective bridge to anticoagulation therapy.     

Deep venous thrombosis in the pediatric trauma population: an unusual event: report of three cases

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the pediatric population has been reported to be lower than in adults. Pediatric trauma patients have predisposing risk factors for DVT similar to those in the general trauma population. We reviewed the records of 2746 children under 16 years of age admitted to our Level I pediatric trauma service from 1989 to 1997. Only three cases of DVT were documented, all adolescents. DVT was located in the upper (n = 1) and lower (n = 1) extremity venous system. One patient presented with pulmonary embolism alone without identifiable DVT. Risk factors found were venous system manipulations, including atriocaval shunt, subclavian central line, and hyperinflated medical antishock trousers garment. Therapy consisted of heparin followed by warfarin anticoagulation. A vena cava filter was inserted in one patient for whom systemic anticoagulation was contraindicated. No DVT was seen in 1123 closed head injury patients or 29 spinal cord injury patients without associated risk factors. The thrombotic risk in pediatric trauma patients is low. Routine screening or prophylaxis is not indicated except for patients who are likely to remain immobile for an extended period of time and require prolonged rehabilitation, have venous manipulations, or present with clinical symptoms. Hematologic evaluation in patients with diagnosed DVT is necessary to identify individual risk factors.     

Screening for major deep vein thrombosis in seriously injured patients: A prospective study

The purpose of the study is to determine the prevalence of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in severely injured trauma patients, to investigate the cost effectiveness of a noninvasive surveillance program, and to assess the merit of current methods of prophylaxis against DVT. One hundred and forty-eight patients (295 limbs) with a mean age of 36.5 years, mean trauma score of 13.3, mean injury severity score of 22.4 with predominantly blunt injuries (88.5%), were part of the study. The mean length of stay was 17.6 days. Venous duplex scans (VDS) were performed on inpatients on days 2-5, day 11, and day 30 following admission. Sequential compression device and/or subcutaneous heparin was used in 99% of patients with compliance being monitored by trauma nurse clinicians. A total of 272 VDS were performed with total charges of $111,520. DVT was found by VDS or venography in eight limbs (2.7%) of six patients (4%), four of the limbs being symptomatic. Two additional patients had pulmonary embolism, both with normal VDS. Routine serial VDS in severely injured patients who undergo aggressive prophylaxis against DVT is not cost effective and therefore not justified. (Ann Vasc Surg 1997; 11:626-629.)     

Heparin prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in a patient with multiple injuries: an evidence-based approach to a clinical problem.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a clinical decision-making process by which to determine if heparin prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is appropriate in a specific patient with multiple injuries. DATA SOURCES: A Medline search of the literature. Search terms included trauma, heparin, deep venous thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, phlebitis, and trauma. STUDY SELECTION: Eleven studies were selected from 789 publications using published criteria. Incidence, risk and potential for prophylaxis were established through a structured review process. DATA EXTRACTION: After the structured review, a small number of studies were available for the consideration of incidence (2), natural history (4) and prophylactic therapy (2). DATA SYNTHESIS: The incidence of DVT in a patient with such multiple injuries is significant (58%-63%). The resulting risk of pulmonary embolism was 4.3% with an associated 20% death rate. Prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin is associated with a statistically and clinically significant risk reduction for DVT when compared with unfractionated heparin and untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Few of the multiple available studies concerning trauma, DVT and pulmonary embolism meet reasonable standards to establish clinical validity. Available guidelines for literature evaluation allow surgeons to select relevant articles for consideration. Patients with multiple trauma appear to be at significant risk for DVT. The death rate associated with subsequent pulmonary embolism is significant. There is reasonably good evidence to suggest that low molecular weight heparin will reduce this likelihood without a significant risk of treatment complications.     

老年粗隆间骨折后发生下肢深静脉血栓的多因素分析

目的下肢深静脉血栓是老年创伤患者最常见并发症之一,本研究目的在于探究老年粗隆间骨折后下肢深静脉血栓的发生率、血栓位置及相关因素。 方法回顾性分析天津南开医院和河北省人民医院于2015年1月至2019年6月收治的老年粗隆间骨折患者。患者入院后经常规超声多普勒扫描以诊断双下肢深静脉血栓（DVT）,将有DVT的患者归为病例组,无DVT者归为对照组。患者的资料由住院病历获得,包括人口学资料、合并症、受伤相关数据和入院实验室检验结果。采用单因素χ²或Student-t检验评估两组患者的差异性,并采用二元logistic回归分析确定发生DVT的相关危险因素。 结果共673例患者纳入本研究,125（18.6%）例患者诊断含有DVT;其中75（60.0%）例为远端型,37（29.6%）例为近端型,13（10.4%）例为混合型DVT。74.4%（93/125）的患者DVT发生在骨折侧肢体,16.8%（11/125）发生于双侧肢体,8.8%（21/125）发生于未骨折侧。多因素logistic回归分析显示,受伤至入院时间、D-二聚体升高（>1.73 mg/L）、红细胞（RBC）减少（男,<4*10¹²/L;女,<3.5*10¹²/L）、周围血管病史、超重和肥胖（以正常BMI为参考）是DVT发生的独立相关因素。 结论本研究结果提示老年粗隆间骨折患者入院时DVT发生率较高,近端DVT达到7.4%。多个相关危险因素与DVT独立相关,这些流行病学数据有助于预测血栓发生、危险评估及针对性术前筛查。     

Is routine thromboprophylaxis justified among Indian patients sustaining major orthopedic trauma? A systematic review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common preventable cause of morbidity and mortality after trauma. Though most of the western countries have their guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in these patients, India still does not have these. The increasing detection of VTE among Indian population, lack of awareness, underestimation of the risk, and fear of bleeding complications after chemical prophylaxis have made deep vein thrombosis (DVT) a serious problem, hence a standard guideline for thromboprophylaxis after trauma is essential. The present review article discusses the incidence of DVT and role of thromboprophylaxis in Indian patients who have sustained major orthopedic trauma. A thorough search of ‘PubMed’ and ‘Google Scholar’ revealed 10 studies regarding venous thromboembolism in Indian patients after major orthopedic trauma surgery (hip or proximal femur fracture and spine injury). Most of these studies have evaluated venous thromboembolism in patients of arthroplasty and trauma. The incidence, risk factors, diagnosis and management of VTE in the subgroup of trauma patients (1049 patients) were separately evaluated after segregating them from the arthroplasty patients. Except two studies, which were based on spinal injury, all other studies recommended screening/ thromboprophylaxis in posttraumatic conditions in the Indian population. Color Doppler was used as common diagnostic or screening tool in most of the studies (eight studies, 722 patients). The incidence of VTE among thromboprophylaxis-receiving group was found to be 8% (10/125), whereas it was much higher (14.49%, 40/276) in patients not receiving any form of prophylaxis. Indian patients have definite risk of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic trauma (except spinal injury), and thromboprophylaxis either by chemical or mechanical methods seems to be justified in them.     

Evolution of deep venous thrombosis: a 2-year follow-up using duplex ultrasound scan and strain-gauge plethysmography

OBJECTIVE: The development of the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and recurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are not yet fully understood. The aim of the study was to identify factors that lead to the long-term complications of DVT. METHODS: In a 2-year prospective follow-up study, duplex scanning and strain-gauge plethysmography were used to evaluate DVT in relation to the development of long-term complications. Each of the 12 segments examined was assigned as a thrombosis score (TS). A total TS was calculated for each leg. Patent segments were assigned a TS = 0, noncompressible vein segments with flow TS = 1 and noncompressible vein segments without flow TS = 2. The degree of resolution of DVT and the incidence, timing, and outcome of further thrombotic events were measured during 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The study involved 86 legs with DVT. The 2-year follow-up was completed for 70 legs. Within 3 months, only 1% of the originally occluded proximal deep vein segments were still occluded. Between all time intervals, from month 12 to month 24, for example, thrombus regression continued in 36% of the legs and thrombus propagation continued in 27%. Multiple regression analysis revealed that an increase in age (P = .008) and proximal location of the original DVT (P = .05) was significantly related to thrombus propagation. Multiple regression analysis showed that the risk factors for clinical signs of PTS were a high venous outflow resistance after 1-month and 12-month follow-ups (P 相似文献   

Pulmonary embolism: which pediatric trauma patients are at risk?

Background/Purpose

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) are rare in pediatric trauma patients, and guidelines for prophylaxis are scarce. The authors sought to identify subgroups of patients who may be at higher risk of developing DVT/PE.

Methods

Case-control study of pediatric trauma patients with DVT/PE. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for known risk factors of PE using matched trauma controls (χ² analysis).

Results

A total of 3637 pediatric trauma patients was admitted over the last 7 years. Three patients developed DVT/PE (overall incidence, 0.08%). There were 2 girls and 1 boy, aged 15, 15, and 9 years, respectively. All 3 had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25 and an initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤8. None of the known and potential risk factors significantly increased the OR for developing DVT/PE: age 9 years or older (OR, 3.6; CI, 0.4-26), presence of head injury (OR, 2.9; CI, 0.3-22), female sex (OR, 1.2; CI, 0.15-9.1), GCS ≤8 (OR, 9.2; CI, 0.9-230), except ISS ≥25 (OR, 82; CI, 7.6-2058). The OR for a combination of age and GCS was 106, and the OR for the 3 risk factors (age, ISS, GCS) common to all 3 patients was 114 (CI, 10-5000; P < .001).

Conclusions

The overall incidence of DVT/PE in pediatric trauma patients is <0.1% and routine prophylaxis is not recommended. Children aged 9 years or older with an initial GCS ≤8 and patients with an estimated ISS ≥25 may constitute a high-risk group in which prophylaxis could be considered.     

The risk assessment profile score identifies trauma patients at risk for deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: The identification of trauma patients at risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the time of admission remains difficult. The purpose of this study is to validate the risk assessment profile (RAP) score to stratify patients for DVT prophylaxis. METHODS: All patients admitted from November 1998 thru May 1999 were evaluated for enrollment. We prospectively assigned patients as low risk or high risk for DVT using the RAP score. High-risk patients received both pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis. Low-risk patients received none. Surveillance duplex Doppler scans were performed each week of hospitalization or if symptoms developed. Hospital charges for prophylaxis were used to determine the savings in the low-risk group. Statistical differences between the risk groups for each factor of the RAP and development of DVT were determined by the chi-squared test, with significance at a probability value of less than .05. RESULTS: There were 102 high-risk (64%) and 58 low-risk (36%) individuals studied. Eleven of the high-risk group (10.8%) experienced the development of DVT (asymptomatic, 64%). None of the low-risk group was diagnosed with DVT. Five of the 16 RAP factors were statistically significant for DVT. Eliminating prophylaxis and Doppler scans in low-risk patients resulted in a total savings of $18,908 in hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: The RAP score correctly identified trauma patients at increased risk for the development of DVT. Despite prophylaxis, the high-risk group warrants surveillance scans. Withholding prophylaxis in low-risk patients can reduce hospital charges without risk.     

Evaluation of the applicability, efficacy, and safety of a thromboembolic event prophylaxis guideline designed for quality improvement of the traumatically injured patient

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TE) such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are common after trauma. Our Trauma Practice Management Committee developed an evidence-based DVT/PE prophylaxis guideline using a modified Delphi approach to standardize care and reduce TE rates. Our objective was to evaluate the applicability, efficacy, and safety of this guideline in the traumatized patient, especially those admitted first to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We developed a risk-stratified DVT/PE prophylaxis guideline incorporating specific injuries, pertinent history, and physiologic parameters, favoring aggressive therapy in those at highest risk of dying from a PE. We prospectively collected data using this guideline in all patients admitted to the trauma or orthopedic-trauma services that were expected to stay for more than 48 hours (March-December 2003). Comparison was made with historical controls. Data collected included DVT, PE, prophylaxis level chosen, inferior vena cava filters, admission service and location, TRISS scores, length of stay, outcomes, adverse events, and specific risk factors. RESULTS: TE rates after implementation of the guideline were lower than historical controls for all patients (1.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.059) and for patients admitted first to the ICU (6.3% vs. 2%, p = 0.018). Completed sheets were collected for 46% of the targeted population. No bleeding events caused by guideline anticoagulation were noted, and one death occurred after inferior vena cava filter placement. Nine of the 12 TEs in the treatment group were in patients with spine or closed-head injury, delaying chemical prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Form-based, risk-adjusted prophylaxis against TE leads to lower TE rates in a general and orthopedic ICU trauma population. Protocol compliance should be enforced.     

Surveillance with duplex ultrasound in traumatic spinal cord injury on initial admission to rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by surveillance duplex ultrasound in the traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) population on admission to rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective sequential case series. SETTING: Midwest regional, university-based, Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities-accredited acute rehabilitation center. METHODS: Charts of all patients with traumatic SCI admitted and discharged from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1998 were reviewed. Preadmission data were collected on demographics, severity of injury, and DVT prophylaxis information, along with rehabilitation duplex ultrasound results and incidence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants met the inclusion criteria. There were 68 men and 24 women with a mean age on admission of 32.4 years. On admission, 45 participants (49%) were classified as tetraplegic and 47 (51%) were classified as paraplegic; 63 (69%) had motor-complete lesions and 29 (31%) had motor-incomplete lesions. Of all the participants, 8 (8.7%) were found to have DVT on admission to rehabilitation. There were no statistically significant differences among participants with regard to age, sex, level of injury, or completeness of injury, when comparing those participants with DVT on admission, those without DVT on admission, and those with thromboembolic events diagnosed later in their hospitalization. Of the 84 participants who had negative duplex ultrasounds on admission, 4 individuals (4.8%) were found to have DVT and 4 (4.8%) had pulmonary emboli subsequently. In these 84 participants, DVT prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin was found to be more effective than was adjusted-dose heparin in preventing thromboembolic phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Incidence of DVT remains high despite prophylaxis in traumatic SCI patients. Two thirds of DVT diagnosed in rehabilitation was identified on admission and one third was diagnosed later. Duplex ultrasound is an effective and valuable tool that assists in the diagnosis of asymptomatic DVT in patients with traumatic SCI who are initiating in-patient rehabilitation.     

Deep Venous Thrombosis in Spine Surgery Patients: Incidence and Hematoma Formation

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a significant health care problem; a variety of factors place spinal surgery patients at high risk for DVT. Our aim is to define the incidence of DVT occurrence in spite of prophylactic measures (mechanical and chemoprophylaxis), and the development of spinal epidural hematoma as a complication of chemoprophylaxis. In a single-center prospective study, 158 patients who underwent spinal surgical procedures were evaluated by clinical evaluation and lower limb Doppler ultrasonography imaging. Only one patient (0.6%) developed DVT; this patient was treated successfully without thrombus progression, with full recanalization. Three patients (1.8%) developed spinal epidural hematoma, but only one required surgical evacuation, and none sustained neurologic deficit. Careful evaluation for DVT risk on an individual basis and good prophylaxis helps to minimize the risk of DVT. The neurosurgeon is thus left to weigh the risks of postoperative hematoma formation against the benefits of protecting against DVT.     

老年股骨颈骨折后下肢深静脉血栓发生情况及其危险因素分析

目的:探究老年股骨颈骨折后下肢深静脉血栓的发生率、血栓位置及相关危险因素。方法:回顾性分析天津南开医院和河北医科大学第三医院2017年1月—2019年6月收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者708例。入院后,对患者行常规超声多普勒扫描以评估患者双下肢是否有深静脉血栓,将有血栓者为病例组(112例),无血栓者为对照组(596例)。提取患者的临床资料,包括人口学信息、合并病、受伤情况和入院时实验室结果,采用单因素检验和二元logistic回归分析确定DVT发生的相关危险因素。结果:共112例(15.8%)患者诊断为DVT,84例(75.0%)为远端型,21例(18.8%)为近端型,7例(6.2%)为混合型DVT。75.9%(85/112)的患者DVT发生在骨折侧肢体,12.5%(14/112)发生于双侧肢体,11.6%(13/112)发生于未骨折侧。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄大、D-二聚体升高(>0.5 mg/L、受伤至入院时间长、血清白蛋白水平降低(<35 g/L)和血小板计数(>262×10⁹/L)是发生下肢深静脉血栓的独立危险因素。结论:老年股骨颈骨折患者入院时DVT发生率较高,近端DVT达到6%。多个相关危险因素与DVT独立相关。