Putting the cardiovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer into perspective: a systematic review of the literature

In the adjuvant setting, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane are recommended at some point during treatment, either in the upfront, switch after tamoxifen or extended treatment setting after tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. AIs have demonstrated superior disease-free survival and overall benefit-to-risk profiles compared with tamoxifen. Potential adverse events, including cardiovascular (CV) side effects, should be considered in the long-term management of patients undergoing treatment with AIs. AIs reduce estrogen levels by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, thus reducing the levels of circulating estrogen. This further reduction in estrogen levels may potentially increase the risk of developing CV disease. This systematic review evaluated published clinical data for changes in plasma lipoproteins and ischaemic CV events during adjuvant therapy with AIs in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent Drug File and BIOSIS were searched to identify English-language articles published from January 1998 to 15 April 2011 that reported data on AIs and plasma lipoproteins and/or ischaemic CV events. Overall, available data did not show any definitive patterns or suggest an unfavourable effect of AIs on plasma lipoproteins from baseline to follow-up assessment in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Changes that occurred in plasma lipoproteins were observed soon after initiation of AI therapy and generally remained stable throughout the studies. Available data do not support a substantial risk of ischaemic CV events associated with adjuvant AI therapy; however, studies with longer follow-up are required to better characterize the CV profile of AIs.     

Defining the role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant endocrine treatment of early breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Over the past few years, data have been published concerning the relative efficacy and safety profiles of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant therapy setting for women with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recently, debate has centred around trials which have studied primary tamoxifen and AI therapy, switching and sequencing strategies and extended adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Here, a group of 24 breast cancer experts review efficacy and safety data from the recent major trials investigating tamoxifen and the third-generation AIs in postmenopausal women, which have challenged the perception of tamoxifen as optimum adjuvant endocrine therapy. Data from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study, National Cancer Institute of Canada MA 17 trial, Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole (ITA) trial, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 8 and Arimidex-Nolvadex (ARNO) 95 are considered to provide a rational interpretation of the impact of these data on current practice, and to highlight areas where further investigation is needed. CONCLUSION: We can be confident that AIs represent superior adjuvant endocrine treatment to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women, either as initial therapy or as an alternative for women who have started adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen. However, there remain issues regarding the best way to use AIs, such as the optimal length of AI treatment and how a sequence of tamoxifen followed by an AI compares with AI monotherapy; these will require further data to resolve.     

Defining the role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant endocrine treatment of early breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Background: Over the past few years, data have been published concerning the relative efficacy and safety profiles of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant therapy setting for women with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recently, debate has centred around trials which have studied primary tamoxifen and AI therapy, switching and equencing strategies and extended adjuvant therapy.

Methods: Here, a group of 24 breast cancer experts review efficacy and safety data from the recent major trials investigating tamoxifen and the third-generation AIs in postmenopausal women, which have challenged the perception of tamoxifen as optimum adjuvant endocrine therapy. Data from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, Breast International Group (BIG) 1‐98 study, National Cancer Institute of Canada MA 17 trial, Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole (ITA) trial, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 8 and Arimidex-Nolvadex (ARNO) 95 are considered to provide a rational interpretation of the impact of these data on current practice, and to highlight areas where further investigation is needed.

Conclusion: We can be confident that AIs represent superior adjuvant endocrine treatment to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women, either as initial therapy or as an alternative for women who have started adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen. However, there remain issues regarding the best way to use AIs, such as the optimal length of AI treatment and how a sequence of tamoxifen followed by an AI compares with AI monotherapy; these will require further data to resolve.     

Adjuvant hormone therapy for breast cancer: alternatives to tamoxifen

(1) After surgical excision of hormone-receptor-positive non metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women, a meta-analysis of 55 trials has shown that adjuvant tamoxifen, 20 mg/day for 5 years, reduces the risk of relapse by 8% and the risk of death by 5% (absolute values). The benefit of treatment beyond 5 years remains to be established. (2) Preliminary four-year results from a double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (ATAC trial) indicated an advantage for anastrozole in reducing the risk of relapse. There was no difference in survival rate. Women taking anastrozole experienced more sexual dysfunction and an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, whereas tamoxifen was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and endometrial cancer. The trial's methodology is controversial, however, and conclusions concerning the relative risk-benefit balances of these two drugs must await the full 5-year results. (3) A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of letrozole, prescribed after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, was stopped early after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. When extrapolated to 4 years, the results suggest that letrozole reduced the risk of relapse (7%, compared to 13% with tamoxifen) but had no effect on survival. (4) A double-blind trial comparing tamoxifen with exemestane in 4742 women who had already received tamoxifen for two to three years showed a higher three-year disease-free survival rate with exemestane (91.5% versus 86.8%). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups. (5) Pending results of further clinical trials, tamoxifen remains the first-line adjuvant hormone therapy for most postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive non metastatic breast cancer.     

Initial versus sequential adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: a review of the current data

ABSTRACT

Objective: One of the principle unresolved questions in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer is whether it is more beneficial for women to receive aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy or start with tamoxifen and then switch to AI therapy. This review will compare the current available efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness data for AIs in the initial adjuvant and switch adjuvant settings.

Methods: A search of the Medline database from 1976 through 2006 was performed for the following terms: breast cancer, adjuvant, aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen, sequential, switching. A search for relevant abstracts from the EBCC, ECCO, ASCO, and SABCS conferences was also performed.

Results: In the upfront adjuvant setting, anastrozole and letrozole have both demonstrated a significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit over tamoxifen. Upfront therapy with a non-steroidal AI appears to be most critical for patients at risk of an early relapse, illustrated by the finding that upfront letrozole provided a significant early DFS advantage over tamoxifen only in patients with node-positive disease (hazard ratio = 0.71, p < 0.001). With respect to safety, both strategies have similar adverse event profiles. From an economic perspective, AIs, whether used upfront or sequentially, are considered cost-effective compared with tamoxifen due to the cost savings associated with a reduction in the breast cancer event rate. From the efficacy standpoint, modeling studies have produced inconsistent results and do not produce definitive data.

Conclusions: Differences in patient populations, definitions of end points, and prior tamoxifen usage between the trials discussed necessitates a careful interpretation but may provide insights in the treatment decision-making process. The BIG 1-98 trial was designed to compare letrozole monotherapy versus a letrozole-to-tamoxifen or reverse-sequence approach and should provide insights to the question of optimal therapy. Until results are available, for higher-risk patients (i.e., those with positive lymph nodes), initiation of treatment with a non-steroidal AI may be beneficial to avoid tamoxifen-associated early relapses that occur in the first 2 years after diagnosis.     

Cost effectiveness of letrozole versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ early-stage breast cancer

Abstract

Background:

The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 and Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trials demonstrated that, in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer, 5 years of initial adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole or anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen. With expected generic availability of anastrozole in July 2010 and letrozole in June 2011, there may be financial pressures prior to letrozole's generic availability to start treatment-naïve patients on anastrozole vs. letrozole or to switch patients already receiving letrozole to anastrozole.     

Incidence and management of side effects associated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are effective and generally well-tolerated as adjuvant therapy. These AIs are now being introduced for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, questions remain about their long-term safety. This paper summarizes the adverse events reported in third-generation AI trials and comments on the appropriate management of these drug-induced adverse events in patients. METHODS: Papers relating to anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole were identified through Medline searches, and proceedings of recent oncology meetings were also reviewed to capture relevant emerging data. RESULTS: The most commonly reported adverse events associated with adjuvant AI therapy include hot flushes and musculoskeletal complaints/arthralgia. The incidence of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events is significantly lower with an AI than with tamoxifen. However, there is a small but significant increase in the risk of osteoporosis and fractures with AI therapy. A potential negative effect on the cardiovascular system, specifically on lipid metabolism, has not been conclusively demonstrated. No significant differences in overall quality of life were observed in studies comparing AIs with tamoxifen or placebo. CONCLUSION: AIs alone and sequenced after tamoxifen are an appropriate option for adjuvant endocrine therapy for most postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer. The incidence of some side effects such as endometrial cancer, stroke, or pulmonary embolism associated with tamoxifen is decreased. Monitoring and management of bone loss associated with AI treatment are essential and are being addressed in ongoing trials. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to clarify the effects of AIs on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular health.     

Is long-term adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with anastrozole indicated?

Background: Tamoxifen is the established adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Objective: To determine whether the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole should replace tamoxifen as the adjuvant treatment in this cancer. Methods: Two recent trials of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment were evaluated. Results/conclusion: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial showed that 5 years of adjuvant therapy with anastrozole reduced recurrence of breast cancer to a greater extent than did tamoxifen. The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a showed that after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen more benefit was achieved by continuing with adjuvant anastrozole for 3 years than no further treatment. Although the long-term adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer with anastrozole is indicated, questions remain as to how long the adjuvant treatment with anastrozole should continue.     

Aromatase inhibitors: a safety comparison

For almost three decades, tamoxifen has been the mainstay of hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients, but now the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, are emerging as potential alternatives, associating greater clinical efficacy with a more favourable overall safety profile than tamoxifen. AIs are associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding compared with tamoxifen, although they are known to affect bone turnover and possibly lipid metabolism. As the available AIs have similar efficacy, it is likely that safety and tolerability profiles will have an impact on agent selection in clinical practice. Therefore, it is important that differences in the safety profiles of the third-generation AIs are understood.     

Anastrozole

Recent trials have indicated that the aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane) are more effective than tamoxifen, the standard adjuvant treatment for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, both in adjuvant and first-line advanced settings. This paper reviews the mode of action and the main clinical trials done with anastrozole, the only aromatase inhibitor currently licensed for use in the adjuvant setting in estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Results from studies using anastrozole as a first-line treatment in advanced disease strongly suggest that this drug should now be considered as an alternative first-line therapy to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. As a second-line treatment in tamoxifen failures, anastrozole has shown a better survival rate and a better side-effect profile than megestrol acetate. Similarly, the use of anastrozole in the adjuvant setting has shown a significantly prolonged disease-free survival time and improved tolerability compared to tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.     

Aromatase inhibitors: a safety comparison

For almost three decades, tamoxifen has been the mainstay of hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients, but now the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, are emerging as potential alternatives, associating greater clinical efficacy with a more favourable overall safety profile than tamoxifen. AIs are associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding compared with tamoxifen, although they are known to affect bone turnover and possibly lipid metabolism. As the available AIs have similar efficacy, it is likely that safety and tolerability profiles will have an impact on agent selection in clinical practice. Therefore, it is important that differences in the safety profiles of the third-generation AIs are understood.     

Aromatase inhibitors: a new reality for the adjuvant endocrine treatment of early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has been used for many decades as the "gold standard" adjuvant treatment for patients with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. This drug, when administered for 5 years, reduces the risk for recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (BC) and death. The optimal duration of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting has not been established yet, but it has been demonstrated that 5 years are better than shorter treatment while it is still unclear if a prolongation of the treatment for more than 5 years is worthwhile. In the last few years, third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), either steroidal (exemestane) or non-steroidal (anastrozole, letrozole), have shown to be an effective alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with BC regardless of its stage. These agents act by blocking the aromatase enzyme which converts androgens into estrogens. The goal of this article was to review the results of recent randomized trials comparing AIs to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women in the adjuvant setting. Two strategies have been utilized: a direct upfront comparison in which both tamoxifen and AIs were given for 5 years or an early switch in which AIs were administered after 2-3 years of tamoxifen for 3-2 years or vice versa. Both strategies have shown a superiority of AIs over tamoxifen and a different safety profile but, the optimal treatment modality has yet to be defined. Moreover, in an attempt to further reduce patients' risk of recurrence after the administration of tamoxifen for 5 years, three trials have evaluated the role of prolonging the adjuvant treatment with AIs for 5 more years in comparison to placebo (late switch). A significant improvement of disease-free survival and of overall survival in the subgroup of node-positive patients, at least in one trial, has been observed with AIs. Despite these important results several unanswered questions remain and the results of ongoing trials will hopefully clarify some of them.     

Letrozole: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Letrozole (Femara), a nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor administered orally once daily, has shown efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced, hormone-sensitive breast cancer. In early-stage disease, extending adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (beyond the standard 5-year period of tamoxifen) improved disease-free survival; compared with placebo there was a 43% relative reduction in disease recurrences or new contralateral breast tumours at a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The results of 4 months' neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with untreated primary disease favour letrozole. In advanced breast cancer, letrozole was superior to tamoxifen as first-line treatment; time to disease progression was significantly longer (9.4 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) and objective response rate was significantly greater with letrozole, but median overall survival was similar between groups. For second-line therapy of advanced breast cancer that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole showed efficacy equivalent to that of anastrozole and similar to or better than that of megestrol acetate. Letrozole is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to tamoxifen; the most common treatment-related adverse events were hot flushes, nausea and hair thinning. In patients with tumours that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole was tolerated as least as well as, or better than, anastrozole or megestrol acetate. In the trial of extended adjuvant therapy, adverse events reported more frequently with letrozole than placebo were hot flushes, arthralgia, myalgia and arthritis. The long-term effects of letrozole on bone mineral density or lipid profile have not been determined and these parameters may require monitoring. In several pharmacoeconomic modelling studies from various public healthcare system perspectives, letrozole was considered a cost effective choice for first-line (vs tamoxifen) or second-line (vs megestrol acetate) treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, letrozole 2.5 mg/day is effective in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced breast cancer. The efficacy, cost effectiveness and favourable tolerability profile of letrozole are reflected in current treatment guidelines recommending the drug as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is superior to tamoxifen for first-line treatment and is at least as effective as standard second-line treatments in disease that has progressed on antiestrogen therapy. For early-stage disease, letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, and prolongs disease-free survival when administered after the standard 5-year period of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.     

Incidence and management of side effects associated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

ABSTRACT

Objective: Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are effective and generally well-tolerated as adjuvant therapy. These AIs are now being introduced for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptorpositive early-stage breast cancer. However, questions remain about their long-term safety. This paper summarizes the adverse events reported in third-generation AI trials and comments on the appropriate management of these drug-induced adverse events in patients.

Methods: Papers relating to anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole were identified through Medline searches, and proceedings of recent oncology meetings were also reviewed to capture relevant emerging data.

Results: The most commonly reported adverse events associated with adjuvant AI therapy include hot flushes and musculoskeletal complaints/arthralgia. The incidence of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events is significantly lower with an AI than with tamoxifen. However, there is a small but significant increase in the risk of osteoporosis and fractures with AI therapy. A potential negative effect on the cardiovascular system, specifically on lipid metabolism, has not been conclusively demonstrated. No significant differences in overall quality of life were observed in studies comparing AIs with tamoxifen or placebo.

Conclusion: AIs alone and sequenced after tamoxifen are an appropriate option for adjuvant endocrine therapy for most postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer. The incidence of some side effects such as endometrial cancer, stroke, or pulmonary embolism associated with tamoxifen is decreased. Monitoring and management of bone loss associated with AI treatment are essential and are being addressed in ongoing trials. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to clarify the effects of AIs on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular health.     

Aromatase inhibitors alone or in sequence with tamoxifen - Clinical Evaluation of the BIG 1-98 trial

Background: BIG 1-98 is a randomized Phase III, double-blind trial that compared tamoxifen and letrozole monotherapy and sequences of both with letrozole monotherapy. Results: At a median follow-up of 71 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly improved in either sequential arm compared with letrozole. At a median follow-up of 76 months, there was a statistically significant improvement observed for DFS (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 – 0.99 in the intention-to-treat analysis) and a trend towards improved overall survival (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.75 – 1.02) for letrozole compared with tamoxifen. Discussion: Sequential therapy is not superior to letrozole monotherapy. Lack of statistical significance does not imply that patients should be switched to tamoxifen after 2 years of an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Long-term data from the ATAC trial shows a significant carry-over effect after 5 years of an AI; we do not have such data for 2 years of an AI. Interpretation of the monotherapy results are confounded by the fact that 25% of patients randomized to tamoxifen crossed over to letrozole after the initial BIG 1-98 results were reported in 2005. Conclusion: This is the second large Phase III trial to show that upfront AI use is superior to tamoxifen.     

Adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Emerging data from clinical trials on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women are reviewed. SUMMARY: Aromatase is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of androgens to estrogens and the only source of estrogens in postmenopausal women. Clinical trials using aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer are few but significant because of their comparative design with tamoxifen given for five years, long regarded as the gold standard for breast cancer treatment. Data from the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen and Combination trial, the MA-17 trial (letrozole compared with placebo), the Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex trial (anastrozole following tamoxifen), and the Intergroup Exemestane Study have shown promising efficacy and safety in the use of these agents. While the optimal aromatase inhibitor for use in the adjuvant setting has not been elucidated, current evidence-based recommendations include using (1) anastrozole as the first adjuvant therapy for five years, (2) tamoxifen for two to three years, then exemestane or anastrozole for the remainder of the five years, and (3) tamoxifen for five years, then letrozole for another five years. CONCLUSION: While their impact on survival has not been determined, aromatase inhibitors are slowly changing the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women because of improved disease-free survival rates. Their ultimate role in therapy is unknown, but educating patients about the potential risks and benefits will allow them to make informed decisions regarding these data and their breast cancer care.     

Drug safety evaluation of exemestane

INTRODUCTION: Hormone-dependent breast cancer can be successfully treated by either blocking the estrogen receptor, as with tamoxifen, or reducing the production of estrogens, as with aromatase inhibitors. Exemestane is a third-generation aromatase inhibitor used in the treatment of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In various trials, exemestane has shown superiority over tamoxifen in both efficacy and safety. Furthermore, aromatase inhibitors are gaining territory in the metastatic, as well as the early, setting for treating patients with breast cancer. AREAS COVERED: The authors describe the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of exemestane and discuss its efficacy and safety within the framework of currently approved and potential new indications. The reader can expect a full update on the characteristics of exemestane, including its efficacy and safety profile compared with tamoxifen and other third-generation aromatase inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: Exemestane is a safe drug due to its steroidal structure, which blocks aromatase at a different site to nonsteroidal AIs (eg., anastrozole and letrozole). Noncross-resistance with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors makes it an attractive alternative for all clinical indications of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer therapy: a variety of treatment strategies

Until recently, standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in the preoperative neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant settings was the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen. An alternate therapeutic approach is to suppress total-body estrogen synthesis using an aromatase inhibitor. The highly potent and specific third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole) have consistently demonstrated improved efficacy over tamoxifen in large randomised neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. As neoadjuvant therapy, compared with tamoxifen, all three aromatase inhibitors significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates, but only letrozole achieved a significantly higher overall response rate. These agents have also been evaluated in three adjuvant strategies: instead of tamoxifen for 5 years, sequenced after 2 – 3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following a full 5-year course of tamoxifen. In all cases, the aromatase inhibitor was significantly more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence, compared with tamoxifen in the first two approaches and with placebo or no treatment as extended therapy. Long-term aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with less endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events and strokes than tamoxifen, but more musculoskeletal disorders and bone loss. Further investigation is focusing on identification of the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from each of these adjuvant therapy options.     

Aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer therapy: a variety of treatment strategies

Until recently, standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in the preoperative neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant settings was the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen. An alternate therapeutic approach is to suppress total-body estrogen synthesis using an aromatase inhibitor. The highly potent and specific third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole) have consistently demonstrated improved efficacy over tamoxifen in large randomised neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. As neoadjuvant therapy, compared with tamoxifen, all three aromatase inhibitors significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates, but only letrozole achieved a significantly higher overall response rate. These agents have also been evaluated in three adjuvant strategies: instead of tamoxifen for 5 years, sequenced after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following a full 5-year course of tamoxifen. In all cases, the aromatase inhibitor was significantly more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence, compared with tamoxifen in the first two approaches and with placebo or no treatment as extended therapy. Long-term aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with less endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events and strokes than tamoxifen, but more musculoskeletal disorders and bone loss. Further investigation is focusing on identification of the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from each of these adjuvant therapy options.     

Comparative review of anastrozole,letrozole and exemestane in the management of early breast cancer

The hormonal therapy of patients with endocrine-sensitive early breast cancer has mainly consisted, for several decades, of the gold standard tamoxifen. The efficacy and favorable toxicity profiles of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, in advanced disease led to their development in early breast cancer. Recent results consistently show the superiority of these agents over tamoxifen. Adjuvant trials evaluated AIs using four different therapeutic approaches: (1) Upfront strategy: randomization of newly diagnosed patients: tamoxifen for 5 years versus AI for 5 years. (2) Sequencial strategy: randomization of newly diagnosed patients: tamoxifen (2 – 3 years) followed by AI or the inverse for a total of 5 years versus upfront AI for 5 years. (3) Switch strategy: delayed randomization (or analysis) after 2 – 3 years of tamoxifen (patients free of disease): 2 – 3 years of tamoxifen versus 2 – 3 years of AI (total treatment 5 years). (4) Extended strategy: delayed randomization after 5 years of tamoxifen (patients free of disease): 2 – 5 years of AI versus placebo. Overall, AIs show evidence of superiority over tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting with proven improved efficacy and better toxicity profile. Despite some common characteristics, a body of evidence on AIs indicates some specific differences between the three agents in mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy as well as toxicity profiles. Consequently, these hormonal agents may not be considered interchangeable in clinical practice. This review explores available results from AI trials and tries to define their present role in the adjuvant management of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.