Depression, anxiety and adjustment in renal replacement therapy: a quality of life assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the quality of life (QOL) of patients on RRT with regard to depression, anxiety, and adjustment to illness. MATERIAL: The study was conducted between 1996 and 1998 at a teaching hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The study population included 125 patients (transplant n = 64, hemodialysis n = 42 and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] n = 19). METHODS: The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS) were used for patient assessment. Results were analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Depression scores were higher for hemodialysis patients compared with transplant patients (H = 15.22; p < 0.005). CAPD patients had intermediate scores (no statistical difference). As far as anxiety was concerned, no statistical difference was observed when the groups were compared. In terms of adjustment to illness, hemodialysis patients were significantly less well adjusted than transplant patients (H = 23.34; p < 0.001). Patients on CAPD had intermediate scores, with no significant difference compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of life of transplant patients is higher than that of hemodialysis patients.     

Health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation in comparison intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and normal controls

The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life (QOL) in renal transplantation patients. QOL is one of the important indicators of the effects of medical treatment. In this cross-sectional study, QOL was analyzed in 302 renal transplant recipients compared with 64 hemodialysis (HD) patients, 207 (PD) peritoneal dialysis patients, and 278 normal controls (NC) matched as closely as possible to the grafted patients regarding age, gender, education, and occupation. All groups were asked to estimate their subjective QOL by responding to sociodemographic data, Turkish adapted instruments of the Nottingham Health profile (NHP), and the Short-form 36 (SF-36). Transplant recipients were significantly younger than the HD and PD patients (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant differences between normal controls and transplant patients ages. Among the three renal replacement methods, QOL in transplants was clearly better than that in HD or PD patients (P < .0001). The QOL measured by the NHP and SF-36 scale showed that the normal population was statistically significantly better than the transplant recipients (P < .0001). Transplant renal replacement therapy provides a better QOL compared with other replacement methods.     

Gastric emptying in patients on renal replacement therapy

In addition to gastrointestinal tract symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite, impaired gastric emptying time (GET) may be related to nutritional parameters and nutritional status of patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patients on RRT are affected by several factors such as uremic toxins, the presence of dialysate in the peritoneal cavity, and the drugs used against renal allograft rejection. In this study, we investigated the gastric emptying time and its relationship with biochemical and nutritional parameters in patients on RRT: those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation patients. Seventy-five patients, 44 on hemodialysis, 16 on peritoneal dialysis, and 15 renal transplant patients, were included in the study. They were examined for gastric emptying time using a radioisotopic method. The results were compared with the GET of healthy subjects. Each group of patients was evaluated in terms of hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, blood glucose, total protein, albumin, serum lipids, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and body mass index and biceps and triceps skinfold. The mean GET of patients on RRT was significantly longer than the mean GET of healthy subjects (87.8 +/- 23.4 vs. 55 +/- 18 min, p<0.05). The mean GET of each therapy subgroups was significantly longer than the healthy subjects (the mean GET was 85.1 +/- 22.4 min for hemodialysis, 87.7+/-31.8 min for peritoneal dialysis, and 94.6+/-16.7 min for renal transplant patients, respectively, p<0.05). On the other hand, the differences in the mean GET between the three therapy subgroups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In addition, time on replacement therapy inversely and blood glucose positively correlated with GET in renal transplant patients. In conclusion, GET was longer in patients on all three RRT modalities than in healthy subjects. GET was not significantly different in dialysis patients and renal transplant patients.     

Gastric Emptying in Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy

In addition to gastrointestinal tract symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite, impaired gastric emptying time (GET) may be related to nutritional parameters and nutritional status of patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patients on RRT are affected by several factors such as uremic toxins, the presence of dialysate in the peritoneal cavity, and the drugs used against renal allograft rejection. In this study, we investigated the gastric emptying time and its relationship with biochemical and nutritional parameters in patients on RRT: those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation patients. Seventy‐five patients, 44 on hemodialysis, 16 on peritoneal dialysis, and 15 renal transplant patients, were included in the study. They were examined for gastric emptying time using a radioisotopic method. The results were compared with the GET of healthy subjects. Each group of patients was evaluated in terms of hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, blood glucose, total protein, albumin, serum lipids, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and body mass index and biceps and triceps skinfold. The mean GET of patients on RRT was significantly longer than the mean GET of healthy subjects (87.8 ± 23.4 vs. 55 ± 18 min, p < 0.05). The mean GET of each therapy subgroups was significantly longer than the healthy subjects (the mean GET was 85.1 ± 22.4 min for hemodialysis, 87.7 ± 31.8 min for peritoneal dialysis, and 94.6 ± 16.7 min for renal transplant patients, respectively, p < 0.05). On the other hand, the differences in the mean GET between the three therapy subgroups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In addition, time on replacement therapy inversely and blood glucose positively correlated with GET in renal transplant patients. In conclusion, GET was longer in patients on all three RRT modalities than in healthy subjects. GET was not significantly different in dialysis patients and renal transplant patients.     

Demographics of blood pressure and hypertension in children on renal replacement therapy in Europe

Hypertension is a well-known complication in children on renal replacement therapy and an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease in later life. In order to define the prevalence of and risk factors for hypertension among children, we enrolled 3337 pediatric patients from 15 countries in the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry of whom 464 were on hemodialysis, 851 on peritoneal dialysis, and 2023 had received a renal allograft. Hypertension was defined as either systolic or diastolic blood pressures in the 95th percentile or greater for age, height, and gender or use of antihypertensive medication. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, duration, and modality of renal replacement therapy. In 10 countries in which information on the use of antihypertensive medication was available, hypertension was present in over two-thirds of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or transplant patients. Blood pressure values above the 95th percentile were significantly more prevalent in very young patients (under 3 years) compared to 13- to 17-year olds (odds ratio 2.47), during the first year compared to over 5 years of renal replacement therapy (odds ratio 1.80), and in patients on hemodialysis compared to transplant recipients or those on peritoneal dialysis (odds ratios of 2.48 and 1.59, respectively). Over time, mean blood pressures decreased in both hemodialysis and transplant patients, but not in peritoneal dialysis patients. Hence, our findings highlight the extent of the problem of hypertension in children with end-stage renal disease in Europe.     

Depression levels before and after renal transplantation

Depression is a frequent problem among end-stage renal disease patients and is closely associated with their physical well-being. We sought to compare the depression levels and confounding parameters in renal patients. The 88 patients (62 men, 26 women) included: renal transplant recipients (n = 27); renal transplant waiting list patients (n = 30); and chronic allograft rejection patients on dialysis therapy (n = 31). Their mean age was 31.05 +/- 11.78 years. Age, gender, marital status, presence of chronic rejection, duration of functional graft, and hemodialysis were retrieved from patient records. Depression levels were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory. The depression stage of the renal transplant recipients was significantly lower than that of hemodialysis patients with chronic allograft rejection (P =.003). The presence of depression was not related to age or gender. Married patients showed a lower percentage of depression (P <.03). There was an inverse correlation between depression and functional graft duration among patients with transplant failure (r = -.370, P =.04). In conclusion, the return to hemodialysis, especially after a short duration of graft function, is associated with depression. The lower depression percentage among married patients may be due to the psychosocial support of the spouses. Therefore, single persons and transplant failure patients who return to dialysis therapy need greater social and psychologic support. Placing greater numbers of patients on transplant waiting lists decreases depression and may provide a higher quality of life with a better outcome during dialysis therapy.     

Quality of life in children with end-stage renal disease based on a PedsQL ESRD module

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an essential subject for children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and their families.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional investigation of HRQOL in children undergoing renal replacement therapies, such as dialysis and renal transplantation, using the 34-item Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 End-Stage Renal Disease (PedsQL 3.0 ESRD) module. We assessed 92 ESRD patients aged 2–18 from four Korean university hospitals.

Results

The male:female ratio was 44:48, and the most common cause of ESRD was chronic glomerulonephritis. Fifty-five children were treated by dialysis, and 37 received renal transplantation. Transplant patients had better HRQOL than dialysis patients in two domains in parent proxy reports: “About my kidney disease” and “Worry.” In child self-reports, transplant patients had better HRQOL than dialysis patients in one domain: Treatment problems. However, there were no significant differences in total QOL scores between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and transplant patients in child self-reports. In addition, there were differences in the ESRD module scores between child self- and parent proxy reports. Children usually reported better QOL than their parents. Child self-reports showed significantly higher QOL scores than parent proxy reports in the domains of General fatigue, Family & peer interaction, and Worry. Children on PD self-reported a significantly higher QOL than children on hemodialysis (HD).

Conclusions

The PedsQL 3.0 ESRD module may be useful as an ESRD-specific instrument to evaluate HRQOL in children; however, a larger, longitudinal prospective study is warranted.     

End-stage renal disease treatment modality and patients' quality of life. Longitudinal assessment

Quality of life assessments were obtained at two 18-month follow-up intervals from 97 end-stage renal disease patients. Data were compared for three stable treatment groups (transplant, home hemodialysis, in-center hemodialysis) and for two transfer treatment groups (hemodialysis to transplant, hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis). Home hemodialysis patients demonstrated the highest quality of life and lowest hospitalization rates over time. Transplant patients had higher employment and perceived health status but not necessarily higher subjective quality of life as compared to in-center hemodialysis patients, and transplant patients experienced more hospitalization. At follow-up, hemodialysis patients who obtained transplants assessed their quality of life as higher than did hemodialysis patients who went on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.     

Survival of liver transplant candidates with acute renal failure receiving renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: Acute renal failure (ARF) in the setting of end-stage liver disease has a dismal prognosis without liver transplantation. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a common bridge to liver transplant despite a paucity of supportive data. We investigated our single-center patient population to determine efficacy of RRT in liver transplant candidates with ARF. METHODS: We identified 102 liver transplant candidates receiving RRT for ARF between April 30, 1999 and January 31, 2004. Patients that had initiated RRT intra- or postoperatively or received outpatient hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis prior to admission were excluded. Survival to liver transplant, short-term mortality following liver transplant, and selected clinical characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Of patients who received RRT, 35% survived to liver transplant or discharge. Mortality was 94% in patients not receiving a liver and was associated with a higher Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, lower mean arterial pressure, and the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Patients receiving CRRT had greater severity of illness than those on hemodialysis. The 1-year mortality of patients initiating RRT prior to liver transplant was 30% versus 9.7% for all other liver recipients (P < 0.0045). CONCLUSION: RRT is justifiable for liver transplant candidates with ARF. Though mortality was high, a substantial percentage (31%) of patients survived to liver transplant. Postoperative mortality is increased compared with all other liver transplant recipients, but is acceptable considering the near-universal mortality without transplantation.     

Advantages of peritoneal dialysis in comparison to hemodialysis,in cardiac allograft recipients with end stage renal disease

End stage renal disease is a serious complication in heart or heart–lung transplant recipients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The majority of these patients are currently treated with hemodialysis. Since there are no randomized control trials comparing hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis in this patient population, the potential beneficial effects of peritoneal dialysis remain largely unknown. We compared the clinical outcome of such patients on peritoneal dialysis with another group on hemodialysis. Our results indicate that patients on peritoneal dialysis had fewer episodes of congestive heart failure, fluid overload and a lower overall hospitalization rate, despite having worse cardiac function than patients on hemodialysis.     

Quality of life and its correlates in ambulatory hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis patients, quality of life (QOL) may vary across a range of individual conditions and social environments. In this study, we focused on ambulatory hemodialysis patients, examining their QOL compared with that of age-matched controls. Correlates of QOL in ambulatory hemodialysis patients were also examined. METHODS: QOL was evaluated by WHOQOL in ambulatory hemodialysis patients and age-matched controls. Correlations of QOL with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), functional performance, physical activity, cognitive function, psychiatric disorders, diabetes status, comorbidities, duration of dialysis therapy, adequacy of dialysis, biochemical variables and nutritional status were also examined in ambulatory hemodialysis patients. RESULTS: In WHOQOL, we found decreased psychological domain scores (19.8 vs. 21.6, p=0.012) and overall QOL (89.0 vs. 94.3, p=0.035) for ambulatory hemodialysis patients compared with age-matched controls, especially in the items: enjoying life (p=0.032), feeling life has meaning (p=0.023), having opportunity to take leisure time (p=0.003) and being satisfied with sexual life (p=0.044). Patients with male sex, BMI >24 and duration of dialysis shorter than 5 years had lower overall QOL than controls. Male dialysis patients also had lower QOL than female patients. As for correlates of QOL in ambulatory hemodialysis patients, age, BMI and psychiatric disorders were negatively correlated. By contrast, premorbid and current satisfaction with personal health were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: QOL in ambulatory hemodialysis patients was lower than in age-matched controls. QOL in ambulatory hemodialysis patients was positively correlated with personal health satisfaction and negatively correlated with age, BMI and psychiatric disorders.     

Comparison of quality of life of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and after transplantation

Preliminary findings regarding quality of life of 458 renal patients treated by in-center hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), or transplantation indicate more favorable adjustment for CAPD patients when compared with center hemodialysis patients. Patients with a successful transplant show the highest overall adjustment when compared with both groups of dialysis patients.     

The effect of dialytic modalities on clinical outcomes in ESRD patients with familial Mediterranean fever

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disease seen primarily in Sephardic Jews, Turks, and Armenians. The disease manifests as recurrent attacks of fever and serositis. The most important complication of FMF is the development of renal failure due to AA type amyloidosis. There has not been extensive experience with renal replacement therapy in FMF amyloidosis. Nevertheless, there may be a concern about the possibility of higher rates of morbidity and mortality in amyloidotic patients maintained on chronic hemodialysis. Moreover, there is not enough experience regarding patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. As a result, the best treatment modality of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in these circumstances still remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effect of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis modalities on clinical outcomes in ESRD patients associated with FMF amyloidosis. METHODS: Forty FMF patients with ESRD due to amyloidosis were retrospectively analyzed. All 40 patients were on renal replacement therapy, 20 on hemodialysis (HD), 20 on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Peritoneal solute transport rates, weekly mean creatinine clearance, and daily mean ultrafiltration (UF) of the patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis were evaluated. Weekly dialysis durations, dialysis membrane properties, Kt/V values, interdialytic weight gains, and frequency of hypotension during dialysis were evaluated on hemodialysis patients. All of the patients were examined according to their demographic characteristics, laboratory results, duration time on dialysis, erythropoietin requirements, frequencies of infectious complications requiring hospitalization, and the two renal replacement modalities mentioned above were compared in terms of these parameters. RESULTS: Serum albumin levels of the patients with FMF amyloidosis who were maintained on peritoneal dialysis treatment were lower (2.87 vs 3.45) and the frequency of infections of the same group was higher (4.2 vs 0.5) than the patients with ESRD secondary to other diseases in the CAPD group. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis showed that peritoneal dialysis may have some disadvantages in amyloidotic patients. Due to the high frequency of hypoalbuminemia and infectious complications seen in this group, peritoneal dialysis is widely accepted as an alternative choice of treatment when hemodialysis is not appropriate.     

Quality of life and psychological issues in peritoneal dialysis patients

Both peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients have diminished quality of life (QOL) scores compared to healthy patients. QOL tends to decline over time, with the perception of the quality of physical health deteriorating more than mental health. However, many patients continue to feel hopeless, anxious, and worry about finances, loss of sexual function, family burden, and loss of independence. Depression is the most widely acknowledged psychosocial factor seen in patients with chronic kidney disease. Major depression occurs in 25% of patients facing impending dialysis. Once on PD, the proportion with major depression sharply declines to approximately 6%. This may be due to adjustment to dialysis, but may also be because depressive symptoms are associated with an increased risk of death. A low QOL score and depression are associated with higher comorbidity, poorer nutritional status, anemia, lower residual renal function, and increased hospitalization rates. Increased depressive scores are independently predictive of an elevated peritonitis risk, perhaps due to inattentiveness, or alternatively from a decrease in immune defenses. Small molecule clearances appear to have little to do with depressive symptoms. Depression is a significant problem in PD and other dialysis patients. There is an interrelationship between psychosocial factors, perception of illness, and clinical outcome that requires further study. Serial and simple measures of both depression and QOL should be obtained routinely in all PD patients. This permits rapid recognition of problems and may enhance patients' education on the importance of depression. Further research on interventions is urgently needed.     

Renal replacement therapies in the aftermath of the catastrophic Marmara earthquake

BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapy is of vital importance in the treatment of crush syndrome victims, who are frequently encountered after catastrophic earthquakes. The Marmara earthquake, which struck Northwestern Turkey in August 1999, was characterized by 477 victims who needed dialysis. METHOD: Within the first week of the disaster, questionnaires containing 63 clinical and laboratory variables were sent to 35 reference hospitals that treated the victims. Information considering the features of dialyses obtained through these questionnaires was submitted to analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 639 casualties with renal complications were registered, 477 of whom (mean age 32.3 +/- 13.7 years, 269 male) needed dialysis. Among these, 452 were treated by a single dialysis modality (437 intermittent hemodialysis, 11 continuous renal replacement therapy and 4 peritoneal dialysis), while 25 victims needed more than one type of dialysis. In total, 5137 hemodialysis sessions were performed (mean 11.1 +/- 8.0 sessions per patient) and mean duration of hemodialysis support was 13.4 +/- 9.0 days; this duration was shorter in the non-survivors (7.0 +/- 8.7 vs. 10.0 +/- 9.8 days, P = 0.005). Thirty-four victims who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy had higher mortality rates (41.2 vs. 13.7%, P < 0.0001). Only eight victims were treated by peritoneal dialysis, four of whom also required hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy. The mortality rate in the dialyzed victims was 17.2%, a significantly higher figure compared to the mortality rate of the non-dialyzed patients with renal problems (9.3%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Substantial amounts of dialysis support may be necessary for treating the victims of mass disasters complicated with crush syndrome. Dialyzed patients are characterized by higher rates of morbidity and mortality.     

Depression, Anxiety, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life Scores in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapies

The aim of this study was to investigate anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), and activities of daily living (ADL) among our hemodialysis and renal transplant subjects. Psychological disorders were prevalent among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), adversely affecting QOL and ADL. All patients ≥18 years under renal replacement therapy were asked to participate in the study. Patients completed 4 questionnaires including the Symptom Checklist-90 subscales of depression and anxiety, the Nottingham Extended ADL scale, and the Duke Health Profile questionnaire. We examined a total of 100 transplant and 63 hemodialysis patients. Transplant patients were significantly younger, better educated, and with lower morbidity than the hemodialysis patients. Transplant patients also showed less depression and anxiety as well as better ADL and physical health. Of the variance in anxiety scores, 12.2% was explained by gender and the presence of cardiac disease (P = .022). For depression, replacement therapy and gender explained 16.4% of the variance (P = .004). Replacement therapy accounted for 35.3% of the variance of the ADL score (P < .001), while together with the additional factors of age, gender, and education these 52.8% (P = .007) was accounted for. For the general health score, gender, and cardiac disease explained 11.6% of the variance (P < .001). This study demonstrated that depression and anxiety are more prevalent among hemodialysis patients compared with kidney transplant subjects; the method of treatment was a major contributor to the variance in ADL and depression scores among ESRD patients.     

Pulmonary function in renal transplant recipients and end-stage renal disease patients undergoing maintenance dialysis

The aim of this study was to reveal the pulmonary function status of renal transplant recipients and chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The study involved 73 subjects, including 49 patients who were either on peritoneal dialysis (n = 22) or hemodialysis (n = 27), and 24 renal transplant recipients. The spirometry results revealed significantly higher residual volume and total lung capacity in the hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis groups than in the transplantation group. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity was slightly below normal in the dialysis patients. Preservation of diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was noted in the hemodialysis group (112.4%). Inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength was reduced in all groups. Only type of dialysis was correlated with this reduction. Inspiratory muscle strength in the peritoneal dialysis group (49.9%) was significantly lower than in the transplantation and hemodialysis groups (54.7% and 66.5%, respectively). The spirometry findings suggest that small-airway disease causes increased residual volume and total lung capacity (hyperinflation) in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients and that this airway obstruction subsides after renal transplantation. Preserved diffusion capacity in the hemodialysis group was attributed to the use of biocompatible dialyzer membranes. Renal failure complications may be the main explanation for global respiratory muscle weakness in dialysis patients, whereas corticosteroid therapy might be the primary cause in kidney graft recipients. Significantly lower inspiratory muscle strength in the peritoneal dialysis group suggests that presence of intra-abdominal dialysate might interfere with diaphragmatic contraction.     

Kidney Transplantation Does Not Increase the Level of Basic Hope or Life Satisfaction Compared With Hemodialysis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Although renal replacement therapy can lead to improved health, it also can cause emotional disturbances in patients. It is believed that the success of renal replacement therapy hinges not only on medical parameters, but also on psychosocial factors, which is why modern medicine provides an ever-increasing role in the improvement of patients' quality of life.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the level of life satisfaction, purpose in life, and basic hope in patients who had received renal replacement due to chronic kidney disease. We also tested whether the specific type of renal replacement therapy and kidney function parameters were influential factors on the above variables.

Patients and methods

Sixty-one adult patients treated via renal replacement for chronic kidney disease took part in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: 31 hemodialysis patients (15 women and 16 men, ages 23–77 years, mean 51.19 years, SD 14.53 years) and 30 patients who had undergone kidney transplantation (14 women and 16 men, ages 22–69 years, mean 48.40 years, SD 12.64 years). The following research tools were used for analysis: Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Purpose in Life Test (PIL), and Basic Hope Inventory (BHI-12).

Results

There were no statistical differences in the level of satisfaction with life between hemodialysis patients and postkidney transplant patients. The results for the SWLS obtained from both groups fell within the normal range. The average SWLS for hemodialysis patients remained 20.61, SD = 5.79; for postkidney transplant patients, it was 22.57, SD = 5.16. The PIL level in the group of hemodialysis patients (101.5, SD = 15.64) was significantly lower than in the group of postkidney transplant patients (109.7, SD = 15.54). The average BHI-12 level was similar in both groups. The average BHI-12 result for hemodialysis patients was 29.00 (SD = 5.06), and for postkidney transplant patients 29.93 (SD = 3.55). The correlations between the psychological variables and selected biochemical parameters are worthy of particular attention. Among hemodialysis patients, there was an additional correlation between SWLS and hematocrit; whereas for postkidney transplant patients, there was an additional correlation of PIL and eGFR.

Conclusions

Our data show that satisfaction with life and basic hope do not increase in patients after renal replacement therapy. The form of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis or kidney transplantation) does not change the above variables. Patients treated via renal replacement require specialized psychological support to improve the efficacy of renal replacement therapy.     

Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Nephrologists report that patients' choice should play an important role in the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the United States, kidney transplant rates remain low and <10% of patients utilize home dialysis therapies. This study examined the effect of pre-ESRD processes on the selection of RRT among incident ESRD patients. METHODS: Using surveys, data were collected for all patients admitted to 229 dialysis units in ESRD Network 18 between April 1, 2002 and May 31, 2002. A total of 1365 patients began chronic dialysis and 1193 facility (87%) and 428 patient (31%) surveys were returned. RESULTS: Substantial proportions of patients were unaware of their kidney disease (36%) or were not seeing a nephrologist (36%) until <4 months before first dialysis. The presentation of treatment options was delayed (48% either after or < 1 month before the first dialysis). The majority of ESRD patients were not presented with chronic peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, or renal transplantation as options (66%, 88%, and 74%, respectively). Using multivariate analyses, variables significantly associated with selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis as dialysis modality were the probability of chronic peritoneal dialysis being presented as a treatment option and the time spent on patient education. CONCLUSION: An incomplete presentation of treatment options is an important reason for under-utilization of home dialysis therapies and probably delays access to transplantation. Improvements in and reimbursement for pre-ESRD education could provide an equal and timely access for all medically suitable patients to various RRTs.     

Techniques de dialyse en réanimation pédiatrique

In pediatric intensive care unit, the available modalities of acute renal replacement therapy include intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and continuous renal replacement therapies. No prospective studies have evaluated to date the effect of dialysis modality on the outcomes of children. The decision about dialysis modality should therefore be based on local expertise, resources available, and the patient's clinical status. Poor hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis is a common problem in critically ill patients. Moreover, many pediatric intensive care units are not equipped with dedicated water circuit. Peritoneal dialysis, a simple and inexpensive alternative, is the most widely available form of acute renal replacement therapy. However, its efficacy may be limited in critically ill patients. The use of continuous renal replacement therapy permits usually to reach a greater estimated dialysis dose, a better control of fluid balance, and additionally, to provide adequate nutrition.