肩袖破裂的影像诊断

肩袖，又称旋转肌袖，对肩关节起主要的稳定作用。肩袖破裂为肩部疼痛的主要原因之一，但在临床上许多病例往往被误诊为肩周炎，而Ｘ线平片又不能很好地显示肩袖发生的病变。笔者通过对５１例肩痛患者肩关节造影和造影后ＣＴ扫描检查，发现肩袖完全破裂１０例，部分破裂７例。认为，肩关节造影为诊断肩袖破裂的重要方法，ＣＴ肩关节造影不仅能提高诊断正确率，而且能提供更多的病变情况，有利于决定手术和手术方法的选择。     

MR imaging of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder: comparison with CT arthrography

Posttrauma damage due to anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation may result in recurrent dislocation. Currently CT arthrography is the method of choice to evaluate the extent of osseous and soft-tissue changes before reconstructive surgery. This study was undertaken to determine if MR was able to depict postdislocation abnormalities and if MR is a possible replacement for CT arthrography. Thirteen patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation were evaluated with conventional radiography and MR; CT arthrography was performed in 10. Twelve patients underwent surgery, and the findings of MR and CT arthrography were verified. MR and CT arthrography showed the integrity of the glenoid labrum equally well. All humeral head defects, detected in nine patients with plain film radiography and CT, were easily identified with MR. Information about anterior joint capsule abnormalities is difficult to obtain with MR. However, separation of the capsule from the bony glenoid can be detected if a joint effusion is present to adequately distend the joint. Preliminary results of this study indicate that MR is useful in the assessment of postdislocation abnormalities and may possibly replace CT arthrography in the evaluation of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation.     

MR and CT arthrography of the shoulder

The combined use of shoulder arthrography with MR and CT imaging offers distinct advantages over conventional nonarthrographic imaging techniques. The improved contrast and joint distension afforded by direct arthrography optimize evaluation of various intra-articular structures and help to define subtle abnormalities and distinguish normal variants from true shoulder pathology. In this article, we review the rationale and basic approaches to shoulder arthrography as well as the imaging appearance of the normal shoulder, anatomical variants, and pathology highlighted by this technique.     

MDCT arthrography of the shoulder with datasets of isotropic resolution: indications, technique, and applications

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this review are to summarize the indications for MDCT arthrography of the shoulder, highlight the features of MDCT acquisition, and describe the normal and abnormal MDCT arthrographic appearances of the shoulder. CONCLUSION: MDCT arthrography is a valid alternative for shoulder imaging of patients with contraindications to MRI or after failed MRI. MDCT arthrography is accurate for assessment of a variety of shoulder abnormalities and, with further validation, may become the imaging test of choice for evaluation of the postoperative shoulder.     

Complications of rotator cuff surgery—the role of post-operative imaging in patient care

When pain or disability occurs after rotator cuff surgery, post-operative imaging is frequently performed. Post-operative complications and expected post-operative imaging findings in the shoulder are presented, with a focus on MRI, MR arthrography (MRA) and CT arthrography. MR and CT techniques are available to reduce image degradation secondary to surgical distortions of native anatomy and implant-related artefacts and to define complications after rotator cuff surgery. A useful approach to image the shoulder after surgery is the standard radiography, followed by MRI/MRA for patients with low “metal presence” and CT for patients who have a higher metal presence. However, for the assessment of patients who have undergone surgery for rotator cuff injuries, imaging findings should always be correlated with the clinical presentation because post-operative imaging abnormalities do not necessarily correlate with symptoms.The complexity of the anatomy and function of the rotator cuff makes the rotator cuff tendons vulnerable to considerable morbidity, often necessitating surgical intervention. Optimal management of rotator cuff abnormalities depends on a variety of factors, such as the presence and severity of an impingement, the degree of tendon damage and individual functional demands.¹ The goals of rotator cuff surgery are to reduce pain, while simultaneously improving the function. The latter is accomplished by two main types of surgical procedures: (1) subacromial decompression surgery alone, typically with an acromioplasty and/or Mumford procedure (distal clavicular resection); and (2) repair of the rotator cuff tear (open or arthroscopic), which is almost always accompanied by a subacromial decompression.Post-operative imaging is performed when pain or disability occurs after a surgical procedure. Often, however, post-operative imaging is degraded by surgical distortions of the native anatomy and metallic artefacts related to implants. Nevertheless, it is imperative that clinicians have an accurate anatomical delineation of the operative site. It is also important for the radiologist to accurately diagnose complications that might occur after rotator cuff surgery to guide optimal treatment. Mansat et al² examined 40 articles reporting the results of open rotator cuff repairs and determined that the overall mean complication rate was 10.5%.The article addresses complications that occur after rotator cuff surgery and expected post-operative imaging findings, with a focus on MRI, MR arthrography (MRA) and CT arthrography (CTA). Because not all post-operative imaging findings result in disability or pain for the patient, we also emphasize our approach and experience regarding how best to define imaging abnormalities after rotator cuff surgery.     

Arthrography of the post-traumatic knee, shoulder, and wrist. Current status and future trends

The current status of arthrography of the wrist, knee, and shoulder has been discussed with particular emphasis given to those conditions seen in patients following acute or chronic trauma. Cross-sectional techniques that impact on the current usage of arthrography of these joints also were discussed. Wrist arthrography remains the standard procedure for the evaluation of ligamentous abnormalities about the wrist. MR imaging is unlikely to make a large impact in this area until improvements in technique and surface coil technology allow routine visualization of the very small, but important, interosseous ligaments. MR imaging of the knee will likely replace arthrography except in those cases in which cost considerations or availability prevent its implementation. MR imaging undoubtedly will continue to contribute to the evaluation of shoulder abnormalities, but whether or not it will completely replace standard arthrography and CT arthrography depends upon the results of future studies.     

Imaging findings in the dominant shoulder of throwing athletes: comparison of radiography, arthrography, CT arthrography, and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation

OBJECTIVE: Conventional radiography, arthrography, CT arthrography, and MR arthrography--including use of the abduction and external rotation position--were compared, with arthroscopic correlation, to determine the spectrum of abnormalities encountered and the relative benefits of each imaging method in the evaluation of shoulder lesions occurring in 17 throwing athletes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Each of 36 athletes with shoulder pain aggravated by abduction and external rotation was examined in a single visit during which conventional radiography, arthrography, CT arthrography, and MR arthrography were performed. In 17 of these athletes, imaging findings were compared with those at arthroscopy. All images were independently evaluated by two groups of musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: Structures found to be affected were, in decreasing order of frequency, the following: the posterosuperior labrum, supraspinatus tendon, infraspinatus tendon, humeral head, glenoid cavity and rim, acromioclavicular joint, anteroinferior capsulolabral complex, biceps tendon, and subscapularis tendon. MR arthrography without and with abduction and external rotation yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity for all lesions with the exceptions of bone sclerosis and enthesophytes (which were best seen with CT arthrography). MR arthrography with abduction and external rotation was most accurate for diagnosis of rotator cuff and anteroinferior capsulolabral complex tears. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these preliminary results, we believe that MR arthrography with abduction and external rotation should be part of the imaging evaluation of shoulder pain in throwing athletes, owing to the high sensitivity of this imaging technique.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic injections of the foot and ankle

Directed injections of the foot and ankle performed under fluoroscopic guidance have both considerable diagnostic value and the potential for targeted therapy by accurately delivering corticosteroid and/or anesthetic to the source of pain. Both large and small joints in the foot and ankle are readily accessed, offering precise information to the foot and ankle surgeon who may be contemplating arthrodesis or other intervention. In addition to its role in pain management, ankle arthrography may be performed in conjunction with MRI or CT, with improved evaluation of articular cartilage and capsular abnormalities.     

Gleno-humeral instabilities

The purpose of this review is to highlight the most efficient imaging exploratory techniques depicting shoulder instability, to describe its various forms and to point out the findings which can simulate instability. In anterior recurrent dislocation, surgery is indicated and the procedure essentially depends on the importance of glenoid rim lesions. In this case, a standard X-ray evaluation is usually sufficient. The CT arthrography or MRI techniques give more specific details as to the severity of the lesions, particularly soft tissues alterations; however, these data do not alter standard therapeutic protocol. In fixed posterior dislocations, CT scan represents the most pertinent technique to evaluate the size of the humeral head defect and to determine the therapeutic follow-up. In subtle forms of instability, diagnosis or instability direction are not clearly assessed clinically and standard X-ray evaluation is usually unremarkable. In this case, further exploration, such as CT arthrography, MR imaging or MR arthrography, are recommended to confirm the diagnosis of instability and to evaluate its direction. The technique of choice is undoubtedly MR arthrography. Atraumatic voluntary painless subluxations associated with hyperlaxity of the shoulder do not require any specific exploratory method because the findings are generally limited to a capacious axillary pouch. Received: 28 September 1998; Revised: 21 January 1999; Accepted: 22 March 1999     

Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most?

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI versus MR arthrography of the shoulder in the assessment of high-performance athletes (professional baseball players) and to compare our findings in these patients with the conventional MRI and MR arthrographic findings in an age-matched control group of nonprofessional athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional MRI and MR arthrographic examinations of the shoulder in 20 consecutive professional baseball players with shoulder pain were reviewed retrospectively by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus. These interpretations were compared with retrospective consensus interpretations of conventional MRI and MR arthrographic examinations of the shoulder obtained in a control group of 50 consecutive nonprofessional athletes with shoulder pain. MR images were assessed for full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) tears, and anterior or posterior labral tears. RESULTS: In the 20 consecutive professional athlete patients, two full-thickness and six partial-thickness undersurface supraspinatus tendon tears were seen on MR arthrography but not seen on conventional MRI as well as six SLAP tears, two anterior labral tears, and one posterior labral tear. Three patients had both SLAP tears and full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Of 14 patients with findings on MR arthrography that were not seen on MRI, 11 had arthroscopic correlation. In all 11, arthroscopic findings confirmed findings on MR arthrography. In the group of 50 nonprofessional athlete patients, five had additional findings on MR arthrography not seen on conventional MRI: two anterior labral tears, two partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, and two SLAP tears. One patient had both a partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear and a SLAP tear seen on MR arthrography. The five patients with additional findings on MR arthrography had arthroscopy. In all five, arthroscopic findings confirmed the findings on MR arthrography. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography is considerably more sensitive for detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tears and labral tears than conventional MRI. MR arthrography showed injuries in addition to those seen on conventional MRI in 14 of 20 patients in the high-performance athlete group. These results suggest high-performance athletes may be a subgroup of patients for whom MR arthrography yields considerably more diagnostic information than conventional MRI.     

Evaluation of the painful athletic hip: imaging options and imaging-guided injections

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews diagnostic imaging tests and injections that provide important information for clinical management of patients with sports-related hip pain. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of sports-related hip symptoms, MR arthrography is often used to evaluate intraarticular pathology of the hip. The addition of short- and long-acting anesthetic agents with the MR arthrography injection adds additional information that can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic imaging findings. Osseous abnormalities can be characterized with radiography, MRI, or CT. Ultrasound is important in the assessment of iliopsoas abnormalities, including tendon snapping, and to guide diagnostic anesthetic injection.     

The radiographic evaluation of shoulder and elbow pain in the athlete

This article presents the important anatomic features of the shoulder joint and the abnormalities to which the athlete is most susceptible leading to pain and disability. It also reviews the pertinent elbow anatomy and discusses the radiographic techniques currently employed in diagnosing elbow problems in the athlete, including tomography, arthrography, and computed tomography.     

Diagnosing Shoulder Pain

When examining an athlete who has acute or chronic shoulder pain, the initial diagnostic imaging method should be plain film radiography. This technique identifies most fractures, dislocations, calcific deposits, and degenerative processes. Other common shoulder disorders may be more readily diagnosed with different techniques, including bone scan, arthrogram, MRI, computed arthrotomogram, or CT.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MRI and arthrography in the investigation of full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Investigation of shoulder pain is important before surgical treatment. The presence or absence of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (FTRCT) may determine the type of surgical treatment. Both MRI and conventional arthrography can be used, but little is known about their relative diagnostic and therapeutic impact. We performed a prospective trial assessing: (a) the influence of MRI and arthrography results on the clinician's diagnostic thinking (diagnostic impact); (b) the influence of the results on the clinician's therapeutic thinking (therapeutic impact); and (c) the diagnostic performance of the two techniques in patients with surgical confirmation. A total of 104 consecutive patients with shoulder problems referred to a specialist orthopaedic shoulder clinic underwent pre-operative investigation with MRI and arthrography. The surgeon's diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and planned treatment were measured before the investigation, and then again after the results of each investigation. Before the presentation of the investigation results, the patients were randomised into two groups. In one group MRI was presented first; in the other group, arthrography. The MRI results led to fewer changes in diagnostic category (14 of 46, 30 %) than arthrography (20 of 54, 37 %), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.5). Magnetic resonance imaging led to slightly more changes in planned management (17 of 47, 36 %) than arthrography (14 of 55, 25 %), but again the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.3). The results of the second investigation always had less diagnostic and therapeutic impact than the first. The accuracy of MRI for FTRCT in 38 patients with surgical confirmation was 79 %, sensitivity 81 % and specificity 78 %; the accuracy of arthrography was 82 %, sensitivity 50 % and specificity 96 %. The clinical diagnosis and management plan can be adequately defined by a single radiological investigation. Magnetic resonance imaging and arthrography had fairly similar diagnostic and therapeutic impact and comparable accuracy, although MRI was more sensitive and less specific. Magnetic resonance imaging may be the preferred investigation because of its better demonstration of soft tissue anatomy. Received: 27 January 1998; Revision received: 27 May 1998; Accepted: 22 June 1998     

Recurrent shoulder dislocation after surgical repair: double-contrast CT arthrography. Work in progress

Nine cases of recurrent postoperative shoulder instability, resulting from failed surgical repair, were studied with double-contrast computed tomography (CT) arthrography. Repeat operations in seven cases showed excellent correlation between CT and surgical anatomic findings. CT arthrography was useful in confirming the direction of instability, particularly of the posterior and multidirectional types. Capsular laxity, subscapularis muscle and tendon abnormalities, and Bankart lesions that were either recurrent or not identified during previous operations were the most common causes of recurrent dislocations. The precise identification of the soft-tissue and bone abnormalities responsible for shoulder instability augmented clinical evaluation and aided preoperative planning.     

Glenohumeral joint instability

Due to the configuration of its bony elements, the glenohumeral joint is the most mobile joint of the body, but also an inherently unstable articulation. Stabilization of the joint is linked to a complex balance between static and dynamic soft tissue stabilizers. Because of complex biomechanics, and the existence of numerous classifications and acronyms to describe shoulder instability lesions, this remains a daunting topic for most radiologists. In this article we provide a brief review of the anatomy of the glenohumeral joint, as well as the classifications and the pathogenesis of shoulder instability. Technical aspects related to the available imaging techniques (including computed tomography [CT] arthrography, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and MR arthrography) are reviewed. We then describe the imaging findings related to shoulder instability, focusing on those elements that are important to the clinician.     

MRI and arthrography in the evaluation of TMJ disorders

Arthrosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a noninfectious, noninflammatory condition characterized by joint pain, noise (clicking) and abnormal motion. It contains various disease processes, such as abnormalities in the menisci or masticating muscles, subluxation of the condyle and degenerative joint disease. Analysis of the morphology and dynamics of TMJ by means of imaging modalities has become highly advanced since the development of arthrography in the late 1970s. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the modality of choice in the evaluation of TMJ owing to the development of surface coils. We retrospectively studied MRI and inferior joint compartment arthrography in the evaluation of TMJ disorders. Nineteen joints of 14 patients included 15 with internal derangement, two with osteoarthrosis and two normal joints. Sagittal MR images were routinely obtained in a resting position and in positions with the mouth half open, and also with the mouth fully open on balanced images. Although perforation of the menisci was difficult to evaluate, MRI and arthrography were equally useful in identifying the shape and position of the meniscus. However, MRI was more reliable in depicting TMJ abnormalities than arthrography. MR is considered to be the modality of choice in screening arthrosis of TMJ, making the definitive diagnosis of internal derangement and monitoring conservative therapy for arthrosis.     

Imaging techniques for the evaluation of glenohumeral instability

The ability to image lesions associated with glenohumeral instability has evolved significantly over the past 2 decades. In the past, several imaging techniques ranging from conventional radiography to computerized axial arthrography and, most recently, to magnetic resonance imaging have been used to depict various labral abnormalities. In most instances, conventional radiography remains the initial imaging study for evaluating the patient with persistent shoulder pain and instability. Recently, however, magnetic resonance arthrography has been firmly established as the imaging modality of choice for demonstrating specific soft tissue abnormalities associated with glenohumeral instability. This article will review the role of various imaging modalities including conventional radiography, conventional arthrography, computerized axial arthrography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance arthrography. Emphasis will be placed on the role of magnetic resonance arthrography as it pertains to the lesions associated with glenohumeral instability. A thorough discussion of the appearance of normal anatomic structures, anatomic variations that mimic abnormality, and the various lesions associated with glenohumeral instability will be provided.     

Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations

Although MR imaging and MR arthrography are the first choice modalities for shoulder imaging, CT arthrography (CTA) may be used successfully to address many clinical questions. The advent of submillimeter multiple detector CT technology and subsequent excellent three-plane resolution has considerably increased the quality of CTA examinations and has propelled this technique to the forefront in a growing number of indications. The combined use of iodinated contrast material for fluoroscopic confirmation of the articular position of the needle before injection of gadolinium chelates for MR arthrography offers the unique opportunity to compare CTA and MRA findings in carefully selected cases. This paper illustrates capabilities and limits of CTA for the study of rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, cartilage lesions, anatomical variants and abnormalities of the glenoid labrum, with correlations to MR arthrography and surgical findings.