中下段胆管癌切除后切缘阳性的意义及预后因素分析

目的 分析中下段胆管癌切除术后切缘阳性的意义,研究影响中下段胆管癌切除术后的预后因素.方法 回顾性分析1990年1月至2006年12月收治的79例中下段且日管癌切除患者的临床病理资料.其中男性53例、女性26例,年龄30～79岁,平均61岁.中段胆管癌34例,下段胆管癌45例.行胰十二指肠切除术46例,行根治性胆总管癌切除术25例,行根治性胆总管癌切除联合肝部分切除术6例,行根治性胆总管癌切除联合门静脉部分切除术2例.5例于术后1个月内死亡,对其余74例患者的15项临床病理特征进行单因素及多因素分析.结果 74例患者总的5年生存率为30.7%,中位生存期为36个月.术后病理榆查为镜下切缘阳性(R1切除)16例(20.3%),其中肝脏端胍管切缘阳性6例,远端胆管切缘阳性3例,双侧胆管切缘阳性2例,环周切缘阳性5例.接受R0和Rl切除的患者的5年生存率分别为34.4%和15.5%.10例(17.2%)R0切除的胆管癌出现局部复发,10例(62.5%)R1切除出现复发,差异有统计学意义(X2=13.024,P<0.01).单因素分析显示术前血红蛋白水平、分化程度、肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结转移、TNM分期及手术切缘为影响预后的因素.多因素分析显示淋巴结转移状况和切缘癌残留是影响预后的独立因素.结论 中下段胆管癌根治术中冰冻病理检查切缘达R0切除是提高长期生存的重要策略,辅助治疗的效果尚待进一步研究.     

Carcinoma of the distal and middle bile duct: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Carcinoma of the distal bile duct is associated with poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. We conducted a retrospective study to identify prognostic factors determining longterm survival. METHODS: From 1990 to 2006, 95 patients with distal and/or middle bile duct carcinoma had resections. Fifty-four patients underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (57%) and 41 patients underwent standard Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (43%). Nine patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy including portal vein resection (9%). RESULTS: Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 60%, 36%, and 29%, respectively. Five-year survival after R0 resection was 34%, and after R1 resection it was 0%. Four patients died during their hospital stay (4%). Multivariate analysis showed negative resection margins (P = 0.040), lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.036), and portal vein infiltration (P = 0.027) as strong predictors for survival, whereas the location of the tumor (distal bile duct vs middle bile duct) and lymph node status were not identified as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year survival depends strongly on negative resection margins, independent of nodal status. Portal vein resections in patients with portal vein involvement fail to ameliorate long-term survival. Primary tumor site--middle bile duct or distal bile duct--did not determine prognosis.     

Location, not staging, of cholangiocarcinoma determines the role for adjuvant chemoradiation therapy

The role of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CT/XRT) in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma is controversial. We undertook this study to determine whether CT/XRT is appropriate after resection of cholangiocarcinomas. One hundred ninety-two patients with cholangiocarcinomas were treated from 1988 to 1999. After resection, patients were assigned a stage (TNM) and were stratified by location of the tumor as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation. Of 192 patients 92 (48%) underwent resections of cholangiocarcinomas. Thirty-four patients had liver resections, 25 had bile duct resections, and 33 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies. Thirty-four patients had adjuvant CT/XRT, three had adjuvant chemotherapy, four had neoadjuvant CT/XRT, and 50 had no radiation or chemotherapy. Mean survival of resected patients with adjuvant CT/XRT was 42 +/- 37.0 months and without CT/XRT it was 29 24.5 months (P = 0.07). Mean survival of patients with distal tumors receiving or not receiving CT/XRT was 41 +/- 21.8 versus 25 +/- 20.1 months, respectively, (P = 0.04). Adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival after resection for cholangiocarcinoma (P = 0.07) particularly in patients undergoing resection for distal tumors (P = 0.04). Benefits of adjuvant CT/XRT are apparent when stratified by location of cholangiocarcinomas rather than staging.     

Resective operations for biliary carcinoma

Records of 25 consecutive patients who underwent resection for proximal bile duct tumor (3 extended right hepatic lobectomies, 6 left hepatic lobectomies, 16 skeletonization resections) and records of 21 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma were reviewed to assess the value of resective therapy. The operative mortality rate for patients with resected proximal bile duct tumor was 4 per cent (0 per cent for liver resection) and that of distal bile duct tumor, 4.6 per cent. The 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates for patients with proximal bile duct tumor were 44 per cent and 35 per cent, respectively; all except one patient eventually died of disease. Survival was better for patients who had curative resection (margins microscopically free of tumor). The 5-year actuarial survival rate for patients with distal bile duct carcinoma was 58 +/- 12 (SE) per cent, with patients who had negative nodes surviving longer than patients with positive nodes. When major hepatic resection and pancreatoduodenectomy can be performed in selected patients with low operative mortality, patients with bile duct carcinoma should be assessed by an experienced hepatobiliary multidisciplinary group before a decision is made in favor of palliative, endoscopic, or percutaneous techniques because surgical resection appears to offer the best possible long-term survival and probably the best quality of palliation.     

Operative results of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma

To determine the benefits of surgical treatment for patients with carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, data on 100 patients with this disease who had been surgically treated in our clinic during the past 18 years were evaluated. These patients were grouped into three, i.e., upper, middle and lower bile duct groups. Patients with periampullary tumor were excluded from this study. Surgical procedures consisted of resection of the tumor, including hepatic resection and dissection of the regional lymph nodes, and a bypass operation of the extra- or intrahepatic bile duct. Resectability rates of the tumor were 21.6% in upper, 82.4% in middle, and 50% in lower bile duct groups. Average survival times of patients who had a resection of the tumor were 30.3 months in the upper bile duct group, 35.9 months in middle (the longest, 13 years and 3 months) and 22.5 months in lower bile duct group. Survival rates of overall patients with resection of tumors were 64.5% at one year, 29.0% at 3 years, and 12.9% at 5 years after surgery, respectively. The middle bile duct group showed the most favorable operative results of all the groups, an extended resection of the tumor should be carried out to obtain for a longer survival.     

Resective operations for biliary carcinoma

Records of 25 consecutive patients who underwent resection for proximal bile duct tumor (3 extended right hepatic lobectomies, 6 left hepatic lobectomies, 16 skeletonization resections) and records of 21 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma were reviewed to assess the value of resective therapy. The operative mortality rate for patients with resected proximal bile duct tumor was 4 per cent (0 per cent for liver resection) and that of distal bile duct tumor, 4.6 per cent. The 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates for patients with proximal bile duct tumor were 44 per cent and 35 per cent, respectively; all except one patient eventually died of disease. Survival was better for patients who had curative resection (margins microscopically free of tumor). The 5-year actuarial survival rate for patients with distal bile duct carcinoma was 58±12 (SE) per cent, with patients who had negative nodes surviving longer than patients with positive nodes. When major hepatic resection and pancreatoduodenectomy can be performed in selected patients with low operative mortality, patients with bile duct carcinoma should be assessed by an experienced hepatobiliary multidisciplinary group before a decision is made in favor of palliative, endoscopic, or percutaneous techniques because surgical resection appears to offer the best possible long-term survival and probably the best quality of palliation. This report is the basis of a paper read by R.L.R. at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Surgical Society, Sapporo, Japan, 1990     

肝门部胆管癌36例诊疗体会

目的探讨肝门部胆管癌的诊疗方法。方法回顾性分析1998年1月至2003年7月收治的36例肝门胆管癌患者的临床资料。结果肝门胆管癌并非少见疾病,而首诊时误诊率较高(39%)。36例均接受手术治疗,根治性切除术16例(44%),中位生存时间为30个月;1、3、5年生存率分别为93%(14/15),50%(5/10)和25%(1/4);各种非根治性切除术20例(56%),中位生存时间为16个月;1、3、5年生存率分别为47%(8/17),8%(1/12),0,(t=2.585)。结论早期诊断及根治性切除术能够提高肝门部胆管癌患者的术后生存率。     

下段胆管癌的外科治疗

目的:探讨下段胆管癌外科手术治疗的方法及其效果。方法:回顾性总结和分析51例下段胆管癌行外科治疗的临床资料。根治性胰十二指肠切除术28例,减黄性手术23例。结果:总体中位生存时间20个月;根治性胰十二指肠切除术、减黄性手术生存期分别为32,8个月;根治性胰十二指肠切除术5年生存率17.8%,减黄性手术为0;根治性胰十二指肠切除术的疗效明显优于减黄性手术（P<0.01）。结论:对下段胆管癌积极行根治性胰十二指肠切除术,能延长生存期,改善患者生活质量。     

Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer. A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the experience and results of a single center in surgical treatment of proximal bile duct carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Whenever feasible, surgery is the appropriate treatment in proximal bile duct carcinoma. To improve survival rates and with special regard to liver transplantation, the extent of surgical radicalness remains an open issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 249 patients who underwent surgery for proximal bile duct carcinoma via the following procedures: resection (n = 125), liver transplantation (n = 25), and exploratory laparotomy (n = 99). Survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, and log rank test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Survival rates after resection and liver transplantation are correlated with international Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor stage (resection: overall 5-year, 27.1%; stage I and II, 41.9%; stage IV, 20.7%; liver transplantation: overall 5-year, 17.1%; stage I and II, 37.8%; stage IV, 5.8%). Significant univariate prognostic factors for survival after liver resection were lymph node involvement (N category), tumor stage, tumor-free margins, and vascular invasion; for transplantation, they were local tumor extent, N category, tumor stage, and infiltration of liver parenchyma. For resection and transplantation, a multivariate analysis showed prognostic significance of tumor stage and tumor-free margins. CONCLUSION: Resection remains the treatment of choice in proximal bile duct carcinoma. Whenever possible, decisions about resectability should be made during laparotomy. With regard to the observation of long-term survivors, liver transplantation still can be justified in selected patients with stage II carcinoma. It is unknown whether more radical procedures, such as liver transplantation combined with multivisceral resections, will lead to better outcome in advanced stages. With regard to palliation, surgical drainage of the biliary system performed as hepatojejunostomy can be recommended.     

Evaluation of aggressive surgery for carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts

The records of 80 consecutive patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer, 45 women and 35 men, median age 70 years (33-89 years), were reviewed. The histologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 45 patients, 34 cholangiocarcinoma and one squamous cell carcinoma. In 34 patients the tumor was located to the confluence, the right or left hepatic duct, in 16 to the middle and in four to the distal portion of the bile duct. In the remaining 26 patients the tumor comprised more than one of these locations (mixed location). Twenty-seven of the 80 patients (34%) were operated on with resection of the tumor. Among patients 70 years of age and younger the resectability rate was 57%. In nine patients the main surgical procedure was bile duct resection, in 15 patients bile duct resection and liver lobe resection, in 2 patients total pancreatectomy and in one local excision were performed. The resection of the tumor was regarded as radical in 12 patients and palliative in 15. The mortality rate was 11% after resection as compared to 30% in patients with nonresectable tumors. The most common postoperative complication was insufficiency of the anastomosis which occurred in seven patients. Three of these patients required reoperation. The median survival time in patients operated on with radical resection was 20 months, palliative resection 7½ months and in patients with nonresectable tumors 2½ months. The quality of life was estimated according to a special schedule and was found to be improved after resection as compared to nonresection. Patients operated with radical resection spent significantly less of their remaining life at hospital as compared to palliatively resected patients or patients with nonresectable tumors.     

Proximal Bile Duct Cancer: High Resectability Rate and 5-Year Survival

OBJECTIVE: To review and update the authors' experience with resectional surgery for proximal bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin tumor) and assess the role of liver resection over the past 25 years. BACKGROUND: Until recently, resection of proximal bile duct carcinoma was uncommon, with most patients undergoing palliative procedures. The authors adopted a radical surgical approach aimed at definitive cure in 1974. Recent reports suggest that resection improves outcome. METHODS: The records of 40 of 94 patients (23 men, 17 women, age range 34-81 years) diagnosed with proximal bile duct carcinoma who underwent resection between 1968 and 1993 were reviewed. According to the Bismuth classification, there were five type I, four type II, 25 type III, and six type IV lesions; 11 patients underwent tumor resection alone, and 25 patients had combined tumor and liver resection (seven of these also underwent an associated regional vascular resection). In 3 patients, venous allografts were harvested from cadaveric donors and used to reconstruct the portal vein. Four patients underwent liver transplantation; in two, organ cluster-type resections including the liver with porta hepatitis and pancreas were performed. RESULTS: The resectability rate in the more recent period of the study was 49.4%. Most type I, three (of four) type II, T in situ, T1a, T1b, and all stage 0 tumors were resected without hepatectomy. In the other subgroups of tumors, the main surgical procedure was hepatectomy. Thirty-day mortality was 12.5%. After tumor resection alone, survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.8%, 45.5%, and 27.3%, respectively. After tumor resection and hepatectomy without vascular resection, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 66.7%, 16.7%, and 6%, respectively. With vascular resection, survival rates were similar: 64%, 20%, and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The type of surgery required to achieve cure is closely related to tumor location, TNM classification, and staging. Increasing resectability through the use of hepatectomy improves survival and offers a chance of cure in patients with more advanced disease.     

不能切除的胆管癌的胆道引流术（附80例临床分析）

目的：了解胆道引流治疗不能切除的胆管癌的治疗效果。方法：分析经胆道引流手术治疗的不能切除的胆管癌80例的临床资料及生存情况，其中肝门部胆管癌49例（61.3％），胆总管中上段癌9例（11．2％），胆总管下段癌22例（27．5％）.手术方式包括胆肠吻合的内引流术，U或T管外引流，或两者联用。结果：15％的病例术后早期出现并发症，手术死亡率为10％。术后随访：肝门部胆管癌、胆总管中上段癌及胆总管下段癌中位生存期分别为6．10、5．50和9．50个月。胆总管中上段癌无1年以上生存者，肝门部胆管癌和胆总管下段癌1、2、3年生存率分别为27．39％、38．54％，6．59％、8．97％和2．10％、0。结论：胆道引流手术是治疗不能切除胆管癌的一种重要方法，可获良好的姑息治疗效果。     

One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer

A positive correlation between absence of residual tumor at resection margins and long-term survival in the treatment of hilar bile duct carcinoma has encouraged some surgeons to use a more radical approach, including liver/portal vein resection and combined pancreatoduodenectomy. However, if liver resection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it may not produce any overall benefit. This review was undertaken in an attempt to determine whether liver resection is a safe procedure and whether if has any beneficial effect over that of local bile duct excision alone, in terms of achieving curative resection and long-term survival. The records of 151 patients with hilar bile duct carcinoma surgically treated between June 1989 and December 1997 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical resection was possible in 128 patients. The remaining 23 patients had surgical palliative drainage. Local bile duct excision alone was performed in 17 patients. Liver resection for tumor extending to secondary bile ducts or hepatic parenchyma was performed in 111 patients; portal vein resection was necessary in 29 of these 111 patients (26.1%) and pancreatoduodenectomy was combined in 18 patients (16.2%). Seven patients died during hospitalization after liver resection, an operative mortality of 6.3%. Margins of bile duct resection were free of tumor on histologic examination in 4 of the 17 local bile duct excisions, but in 86 of the 111 liver resections. The cumulative survival rate after local bile duct excision was 85.7% at 1 year, 42.9% at 2 years, 21.4% at 3 years, and 0% at 4 years. However, the survival rate after liver resection (excluding operative mortality) was 97.1% at 1 year, 72.8% at 2 years, 55.3% at 3 years, and 24.0% at 5 years. Survival and the percentage of patients with tumor-free resection margins after liver resection were superior to those after local bile duct excision. Resection of hilar bile duct carcinoma offers long-term survival only when surgery is aggressive and includes liver resection. Received for publication on July 2, 1998; accepted on July 5, 1998     

Surgical approach to bismuth Type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas: audit of 54 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the optimal surgical strategy for Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Local or hilar resections is often performed for Bismuth type I and II tumors; however, reported outcomes have been unsatisfactory with a high recurrence and low survival rate. To improve survival, some authors have recommended right hepatectomy. However, the clinical value of this approach has not been validated. METHODS: Records of 54 consecutive patients who underwent resection of a Bismuth type I or II hilar cholangiocarcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. Through 1996, bile duct resection or the smallest necessary hepatic segmentectomy was performed. Beginning in 1997, choice of resection was based on the cholangiographic tumor type. For nodular or infiltrating tumor, right hepatectomy was indicated; for papillary tumor, bile duct resection with or without limited hepatectomy was chosen. RESULTS: Right hepatectomy was performed in 5 (20.8%) of 24 patients through 1996 and was done in 22 (73.3%) of 30 patients from 1997 (P = 0.0003). In patients without pM1 disease, R0 resection was achieved more frequently in the later period than in the earlier period (23 of 24 = 95.8% vs. 13 of 21 = 61.9%, P = 0.0073), which lead to better survival (5-year survival, 44.3% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.0495). In the 31 patients with nodular or infiltrating tumor, who tolerated surgery and did not have pM1 disease, survival was better in the 18 patients who underwent right hepatectomy than in those who did not (5-year survival, 62.9% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.0030). In cases of papillary tumor, bile duct resection with or without limited hepatectomy was sufficient to improve long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical approach to Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas should be determined according to cholangiographic tumor type. For nodular and infiltrating tumors, right hepatectomy is essential; for papillary tumor, bile duct resection with or without limited hepatectomy is adequate.     

Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer

Prognostic factors influencing long-term survival after radical resection for distal bile duct cancer have not been well established because of the rarity of this malignancy. The goal of this study was to identify main prognostic factors in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma. A retrospective study consisting of 122 patients with distal bile duct cancer who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in three major university hospitals was performed to identify the main prognostic factors. Major surgical complications occurred in 40 patients (32.8%), of whom eight died (6.6%) in the hospital. Overall actuarial survival (excluding hospital deaths) at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up was 82.9, 49.4, and 32.7 per cent, respectively, with a median survival of 36 months. Univariate analysis showed that papillary tumor (P = 0.045), negative surgical margin (R0 resection, P = 0.005), earlier pT (P = 0.005), pTNM stage (P < 0.001), and absence of lymph node involvement (P < 0.0001) were significant predictors of survival. On multivariate analysis, only lymph node metastasis was shown to be an independent prognostic factor of survival (P = 0.036). Lymph node involvement was the most important survival predictor after a Whipple resection in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.     

肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓的外科治疗

目的 通过对肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓手术病例临床资料的回顾性分析,探讨不同手术方式的疗效以及对远期预后的影响.方法 2008年1月-2012年12月,北京协和医院肝脏外科收治肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓行手术病例共9例,5例病例行根治性半肝切除术,3例行肝部分切除术,1例行术中射频,全部病例均行胆总管探查取栓术;术后通过数字减影血管成像技术进行随诊;全部病例术后随访时间均超过12个月.结果 全部手术病例术后黄疸指数均明显下降,根治性手术病例术后无瘤生存时间、生存时间均略优于姑息手术病例,术后再次胆道梗阻发病率也低于姑息手术病例.结论 肝细胞肝癌合并胆总管癌栓病例通过适当的手术方式可以达到切除肿瘤、解除胆道梗阻的目的,根治性半肝切除术的疗效优于肝部分切除术.     

中下段胆管癌的诊断和鉴别诊断

目的　探讨中下段胆管癌的诊断和鉴别诊断。方法　对 18例术前误诊为中下段胆管癌资料进行回顾性分析。结果　本组 9例经ERCP、6例MRCP、以及PTC、T管胆道造影、CT各 1例确定胆管狭窄部位。 16例经手术探查确定诊断 ,分别为 :胆总管损伤 3例 ,胆囊管与胆总管汇合点过低伴结石嵌顿 2例 ,胆囊癌转移灶 2例 ,胰腺癌 2例 ,胰腺结核 2例 ,慢性胰腺炎、胆总管结石、壶腹癌、十二指肠癌和腹腔结核各 1例 ;2例经随访治疗分别确定为腹腔结核和硬化性胆管炎。结论　单凭胆管狭窄的影像学资料难以将中下段胆管癌与许多病变相鉴别。应研究其术前和术中的诊断方法 ,提高诊断准确率 ,以便选择最适当的治疗方案     

肝外胆管癌的手术治疗效果分析

目的探讨肝外胆管癌的外科治疗。方法回顾分析我院外科手术收治的61例肝外胆管癌临床资料。结果其中胆管中段癌28例、胆管下段癌33例。胆管中段癌根治性切除率为64.29%,手术并发症14.28%,5年生存率38.89%;胆管下段癌根治性切除率为75.76%,手术并发症36%,5年生存率24%,两组间均无统计学差异。结论肝外胆管癌缺乏有效的早期诊断方法,手术仍是治疗肝外胆管癌的首选方法,胆管中段癌和胆管下段癌不需要区别讨论。     

Status of surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer

Complete surgical resection of biliary tract carcinoma remains the best treatment. The Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery has organized a registry project and established a classification of biliary tract carcinoma. We report here the status of biliary surgery in Japan. For hilar bile duct carcinoma, major hepatectomy is needed to increase the resection rate, and total caudate lobectomy is required for curative resection. The 5-year survival rate was 39.1%. Middle and distal bile duct carcinomas were treated with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD) or bile duct resection alone. The 5-year survival rate was 44.0%. The treatment of gallbladder carcinoma with pT1 lesions is cholecystectomy. The treatment of pT2 lesions is extended cholecystectomy or various hepatectomy with or without extrahepatic bile duct resection along with lymphadenectomy. Treatment of pT3 and pT4 lesions includes hepatectomy with or without bile duct resection, combined with vascular resection, extended lymphadenectomy, and autonomic nerve dissection. Several groups in Japan have performed hepatopancreatoduodenectomy. The 5-year survival rate of pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 were 93.7, 65.1, 27.3, and 13.8%. PD or PPPD is the standard operation for carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. The 5-year survival rate was 57.5%.     

远端胆管癌切除患者术后生存的影响因素分析

目的 研究影响远端胆管癌手术预后的因素,为远端胆管癌手术方式的选择和治疗提供依据.方法 对北京世纪坛医院、北京大学人民医院和北京大学第一医院1995-2009年具有完整随访资料的103例远端胆管癌病例进行回顾性分析,应用Kaplan-Meier单因素分析法和Cox比例风险模型多因素分析法对10个可能对预后产生影响的因素进行分析.结果 1、3、5年总体生存率分别为72%、41%和25%,中位生存期为24.13个月;单因素方差分析结果表明手术方式、淋巴结转移、TNM分期和切缘情况与远端胆管癌术后生存有关;Cox比例风险模型多因素分析结果表明切缘情况、淋巴结转移和TNM分期是影响远端胆管癌切除术后预后的独立因素.结论 切缘情况、淋巴结转移和TNM分期为远端胆管癌切除术后有关生存影响的独立因素,胰十二指肠切除术为远端胆管癌首选的手术方式.