Prevention of spinal cord ischemia after cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta--monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials

The pressure difference between the mean distal aortic pressure (MDAP) and the cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), defined as the spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP), as well as somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were monitored intraoperatively to detect and prevent intraoperative spinal cord ischemia in 24 patients who required cross-clamping of the descending thoracic aorta. A temporary axillo-femoral shunt, utilizing a 10 mm woven Dacron tube graft, was employed in 10 patients and partial cardiopulmonary bypass was employed in fourteen. Ischemic SEP changes were seen in six patients. Two patients, whose SCPPs were 32 and 35 mmHg, showed a complete loss of SEP and subsequently developed paraplegia. In the other four cases, increase of the MDAP and/or withdrawal of cerebrospinal fluid were performed to increase the SCPP to more than 60 mmHg when ischemic SEP changes occurred. The SEP gradually recovered in two of these cases. The ischemic SEP changes seen in one patient, who had the longest aortic cross-clamping time, (175 minutes) returned to normal immediately after unclamping. In another case, who had a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, the intercostal arteries were reimplanted since the ischemic SEP changes did not revert. These four patients recovered without any neurological deficit. In the other 18 cases without ischemic SEP change, SCPP was kept at more than 40 mmHg during aortic cross-clamping. We conclude that the SCPP should be maintained at more than 40 mmHg during aortic occlusion, and increased to more than 60 mmHg when ischemic SEP changes occur, by increasing MDAP and/or withdrawing cerebrospinal fluid in order to prevent postoperative paraplegia.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord perfusion pressure are significant predictors of postoperative neurologic dysfunction

Paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair can occur in 3% to 40% of patients. This study investigated the efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage to protect the spinal cord during aortic cross-clamping (AXC) and the interrelationship between drainage, spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP), and changes in somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in a canine model of spinal cord ischemia. SCPP was defined as the mean distal aortic pressure minus the CSF pressure. In the experimental group, CSF was drained before AXC. SEP changes were quantitated as time to latency increase of 10% (L-10) and time to complete SEP loss. Drainage of CSF had no significant effect on the distal aortic pressure but significantly increased SCPP from 9.4 to 21.8 mm Hg and decreased the incidence of postoperative neurologic injury. Ischemic SEP changes were highly significant predictors of postoperative neurologic injury, occurring more than two times earlier in the paralyzed and paraparetic animals. Dogs without neurologic injury had significantly higher SCPP, delayed L-10 time, and delayed SEP loss.     

Paraplegia after thoracic aortic occlusion: influence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Experimental and early clinical results

Paraplegia occurs in 6.5% to 40% of patients after repair of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms requiring aortic clamping. This study aimed to determine whether drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) done before aortic cross-clamping could decrease the incidence of paraplegia in dogs. The descending thoracic aorta was clamped distal to the left subclavian artery for either 40 minutes (group I) or 60 minutes (group II). All control animals in group I (10) and group II (10) showed evidence of spinal cord injury with paraparesis or paraplegia. In contrast, 9 of 10 animals (90%) in group I and 7 of 10 animals (70%) in group II that had CSF drainage before aortic cross-clamping were neurologically normal (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.01, respectively). Aortic pressure distal to the aortic cross clamp was the same in all groups; however, spinal cord perfusion pressure (distal aortic pressure minus CSF pressure) was significantly higher in neurologically normal animals (34 +/- 5 mm Hg, n = 15) compared with those with paraparesis (26 +/- 4 mm Hg, n = 8) or paraplegia (19 +/- 5 mm Hg, n = 8) (r = 0.871, p less than 0.001). This study demonstrates that drainage of CSF before thoracic aortic occlusion significantly increases spinal cord perfusion pressure and decreases the incidence of paraplegia. Limited early clinical experience suggests that CSF drainage may be a useful adjunct to prevent paraplegia in patients who are having repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.     

Reconstructive surgery in 59-year-old patient with coarctation of aorta under the monitoring of somatosensory evoked potential and spinal cord perfusion pressure]

Postoperative paraplegia is a relatively rare complication in reconstructive surgery for coarctation of the aorta and the operative treatment is usually performed without any adjuncts. A 59-year-old male patient underwent replacement of descending thoracic aorta with vascular prosthesis under the monitoring of SEP and spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) [pressure difference between mean distal aortic pressure (MDAP) and the cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP)]. During cross-clamping of the aorta, MDAP decreased from 61 to 40 mmHg and CSFP increased from 6 to 15 mmHg, SCPP was 25 mmHg, and the amplitude of the SEP waves rapidly decreased. As the ischemic changes of spinal cord were suspected, the aortic cross-clamping was released. The amplitude of SEP recovered to the preoperative level immediately after de-clamping. In order to prevent spinal cord ischemia, the partial cardio-pulmonary bypass was employed, and SCPP was maintained above 60 mmHg, so that SEP did not show any ischemic changes during cross-clamping of the aorta. The patient did not develop any neurological deficit postoperatively. The monitoring of SEP and SCPP appears to be useful for prevention of postoperative paraplegia in the surgical treatment for coarctation of the aorta.     

The value of motor evoked potentials in reducing paraplegia during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: Paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair mainly occurs in patients with Crawford extent I and II. We assessed the impact of monitoring spinal cord integrity and the subsequent adjusted surgical maneuvers on neurologic outcome in repairs of type I and II TAAAs. METHODS: Surgical repair of TAAAs was performed in 112 consecutive patients with extent type I (n = 42) and type II (n = 70) aneurysms. The surgical protocol included cerebrospinal fluid drainage, moderate hypothermia, and left heart bypass with selective organ perfusion. Spinal cord function was assessed by means of monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Significant decreased MEPs always generated adjustments, including raising distal aortic and mean arterial pressure, reattachment of visible intercostal arteries, or endarterectomy of the excluded aortic segment with revascularization of back bleeding intercostal arteries. RESULTS: Motor evoked potential monitoring could be achieved in all patients. By maintaining a mean distal aortic pressure of 60 mm Hg, MEPs were adequate in 82% of patients. Increasing distal aortic pressure restored MEPs in all patients. In 19 patients (17%), MEPs decreased significantly during aortic cross-clamping because of critical spinal cord ischemia. MEPs returned in all patients after spinal cord blood flow was re-established except in three patients with type II TAAA in whom MEPs could not be restored, and absent MEPs at the end of the procedure corresponded with neurologic deficit. Delayed paraplegia developed in two patients owing to hemodynamic instability with insufficient mean arterial blood pressure to maintain adequate spinal cord perfusion. CONCLUSION: Monitoring MEPs is a highly reliable technique to assess spinal cord ischemia during TAAA repair. A surgical protocol including cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, and monitoring of MEPs can reduce the paraplegia rate significantly. Adjusted hemodynamic and surgical strategies induced by changes in MEPs could restore spinal cord ischemia in most patients, preventing early and late paraplegia in all type I patients. In type II patients, early paraplegia occurred in 4.2% and delayed neurologic deficit in 2.9%. Despite all available measures, complete prevention of paraplegia in type II aneurysms seems to be unrealistic.     

Prevention of spinal cord injury after cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta

Paraplegia has been a devastating and unpredictable complication following surgical procedures involving temporary occlusion of the thoracic aorta. This study was undertaken to determine the effect of the pressure gradient between the aortic pressure distal to the occluding aortic clamp and cerebrospinal fluid pressure, defined as “Relative spinal cord perfusion pressure” (RSPP) on the development of the ischemic spinal cord injury. In twelve mongrel dogs, the thoracic aorta just distal to the left subclavian artery was cross-clamped. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were generated by peripheral stimulation of the bilateral peroneal nerves. After complete loss of SEP was evident, six dogs, Group 1, were subjected to occlusion of the descending thoracic aorta for a period of 20 minutes with maintenance of 0 mmHg of RSPP, by an injection of normal saline into the subarachnoid space. Six other dogs, Group 2, likewise underwent 40 minutes of aortic occlusion, keeping the RSPP at 15 mmHg by withdrawal ofcerebrospinal fluid. All the dogs in Group 1 developed paraplegia, whereas all the dogs in Group 2 demonstrated complete postoperative recovery without any neurological sequelae. Thus, RSPP is a most important factor in the development of the ischemic spinal cord injury during the temporary thoracic aortic occlusion.     

Strategies to prevent neurologic deficit based on motor-evoked potentials in type I and II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Purpose: Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were monitored during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair to assess spinal cord ischemia and evaluate the subsequent protective strategies to prevent neurologic deficit. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 1997, 52 consecutive patients with type I (n = 24) and type II (n = 28) TAAA underwent surgery (mean patient age, 60 years; range, 21–78 years). The surgical protocol included left heart bypass, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and monitoring transcranial myogenic MEPs. When spinal cord ischemia was detected, distal aortic pressure and mean arterial pressure were increased. By means of sequential crossclamping, MEPs were used to identify critical intercostal or lumbar arteries. Results: Reproducible MEPs could be recorded in all patients, and spinal cord ischemia was detected within 2 minutes. During distal aortic perfusion, 14 patients (27%) showed rapid decrease in the amplitude of MEPs to less than 25% of baseline, indicating spinal cord ischemia, which could be corrected by increasing distal aortic pressure. The mean distal aortic pressure to maintain adequate cord perfusion was 66 mm Hg; however, it varied among individuals between 48 and 110 mm Hg. In 24 patients (46%), MEPs disappeared after segmental clamping and returned after reattachment of intercostal arteries. In 9 patients (17%), MEPs disappeared completely, but no intercostal arteries were found. After aortic endarterectomy, 6 or 8 mm Dacron grafts were anastomosed to intercostal arteries, and MEPs returned after reperfusion. Using this aggressive surgical approach based on MEPs, no early or late paraplegia occurred in this series. Conclusion: Monitoring of MEPs is an effective technique to assess spinal cord ischemia. Operative strategies based on MEPs prevented neurologic deficits in patients treated for type I and II TAAA. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:48-59.)     

选择性肋间动脉灌注在降主动脉手术中的应用

目的 探讨选择性肋间动脉灌注在降主动脉手术中对脊髓的保护作用.方法 2007年8月至2009年3月,5例降主动脉夹层和2例降主动脉瘤病人行降主动脉置换术.术中保留置换降主动脉上所有肋间动脉,进行选择性肋间动脉灌注,以减少脊髓缺血时间及程度以达到脊髓保护的目的 .术后早期观察和中期随访是否有截瘫发生.结果 术中脊髓缺血23～27 min,平均(24.8±1.6) min.7例术后均未发生截瘫,治愈出院.随访1～19个月,全组无截瘫,生活质量良好.结论 选择性肋间动脉灌注可缩短脊髓缺血时间和程度,脊髓保护效果良好,并可大大降低手术操作难度.     

Prevention of spinal cord injury after cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta

Paraplegia has been a devastating and unpredictable complication following cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta. In this study, the effect of the pressure gradient between the aortic pressure distal to occlusion and cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), defined as relative spinal cord perfusion pressure (RSPP), on the development of spinal cord injury was investigated. In 32 mongrel dogs, the thoracic aorta just distal to the left subclavian artery was cross-clamped. After a complete loss of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) had been confirmed, the dogs were divided into six groups by an additional cross-clamp interval and RSPP as follows: Group I (n = 6): 0 mmHg for 10 minutes; Group II (n = 8): 0 mmHg for 20 minutes; Group III (n = 3): 7.5 mmHg for 20 minutes; Group IV (n = 3): 7.5 mmHg for 40 minutes; Group V (n = 6): 15 mmHg for 40 minutes and Group VI (n = 6): 15 mmHg for 60 minutes. RSPP was adjusted by either withdrawal of cerebrospinal fluid or injection of normal saline solution into the subarachnoid space. SEP were generated by the stimulation of bilateral peroneal nerves. The incidence of postoperative paraplegia was 0% in Groups I and V, 33% in Group III, 50% in Group VI and 100% in Groups II and IV. This study showed that RSPP plays an important role in the development of spinal cord injury during cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta. Therefore, RSPP should be maintained at as high a level as possible in order to prevent spinal cord injury even if SEP disappear during aortic occlusion.     

Interventions for reversing delayed-onset postoperative paraplegia after thoracic aortic reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Delayed postoperative paraplegia is a recognized complication of thoracic (TAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to treat delayed-onset paraplegia. METHODS: Between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2001, 99 patients underwent surgical repair of TAA, Crawford type I, II, or III TAAA. Standard intraoperative management included distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage unless contraindicated. Therapeutic interventions to treat delayed paraplegia included lumbar CSF drainage and vasopressor therapy. RESULTS: Three of the 99 patients had paraplegia upon awakening. Delayed-onset paraplegia occurred in 8 patients, 2 of whom had recurrent episodes. In those 8 patients, the initial episode occurred at a median of 21.6 hours (range 6.4 to 110.0 hours) after surgery and the second episode averaged 176 hours after surgery. At the onset of paraplegia, the average mean arterial pressure was 74 mm Hg and CSF pressure was 14 mm Hg. Three of the 8 patients had a functioning CSF catheter at the onset and the other 5 patients had catheters subsequently placed. Therapeutic interventions increased blood pressure to a mean arterial pressure of 95 mm Hg and decreased CSF pressure to 10 mm Hg. Five of the 8 patients with delayed-onset paraplegia made a full neurologic recovery and 3 had partial recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with delayed-onset paraplegia had an increased chance of recovery as compared with those patients in whom paraplegia was diagnosed upon emergence from anesthesia. Acute interventions directed to increase spinal cord perfusion by increasing systemic blood pressure and decreasing CSF pressure were effective for the reversal of delayed onset of paraplegia after TAA or TAAA repair, resulting in an overall 3% incidence of permanent paraplegia and 3% incidence of residual paraparesis.     

Centrifugal pump support for distal aortic perfusion during repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injury

Paraplegia from ischemic injury of the spinal cord and renal failure from inadequate perfusion of the kidneys may occur from aortic cross-clamping during repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries. After Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 26 patients surgically treated for traumatic transection of the descending thoracic aorta during a 14 year period (1987-2001), using centrifugal pump (Sarns) support for distal aortic perfusion. The study group comprised 19 males and 7 females, whose ages ranged from 15 to 69 years. For all but 1 patient, who fell from a flagpole, the injuries were incurred in motor vehicle accidents. Aortic cross-clamp time lasted between 5 to 78 min (median = 40 min). Mean arterial pressure ranged from 50 to 80 mm Hg (median = 70 mm Hg). All patients survived operation without developing paraplegia or renal failure. Distal centrifugal pump perfusion during repair of traumatic injury of the descending thoracic aorta is a valuable adjunct during surgical treatment and aids in preservation of spinal cord and renal function.     

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and steroids provide better spinal cord protection during aortic cross-clamping than does either treatment alone

We investigated whether intravenous methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) before 30 minutes of aortic cross-clamping and after 4 hours could enhance the effects of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on spinal cord perfusion pressure and postoperative paraplegia when proximal blood pressure was controlled with sodium nitroprusside and partial exsanguination. Dogs were randomized into three groups: group 1 (n = 6), control; group 2 (n = 7), steroids; and group 3 (n = 6), steroids with cerebrospinal fluid drainage. During aortic cross-clamping, blood pressure proximal to the clamp decreased significantly in each group compared with baseline (p less than 0.05), but did not differ among groups (group 1 = 82.2, group 2 = 82.1, group 3 = 86.6 mm Hg, p greater than 0.05). Mean distal pressure decreased from systemic values to 8.4, 8.5, and 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, after aortic cross-clamping (p less than 0.05); these values did not differ from one another (p greater than 0.05). During aortic cross-clamping, cerebrospinal fluid pressure in groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly compared with baseline (12.2 versus 8.2, 14.2 versus 10.7 mm Hg, p greater than 0.05), whereas in group 3 the baseline cerebral spinal fluid pressure of 10.7 mm Hg decreased to 0.4 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). Spinal cord perfusion pressure in group 3 was significantly higher than in groups 1 and 2 (3.3 versus -3.9 and -5.7 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), but did not differ between groups 1 and 2 (p greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Use of evoked potential monitoring in 118 patients

PURPOSE: Paraplegia is the most dreaded and severe complication of surgery on the descending thoracic aorta (TAA) and thoracoabdominal aorta (TAAA). The functional integrity of the spinal cord can be monitored by means of intraoperative recording of myogenic-evoked responses after transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. In this study, we evaluated the results of evoked potential monitoring and the adequacy of the strategy followed. METHOD: The spinal cord of 118 patients (78 men; age, 65 +/- 12 years; 79 TAAAs, 39 TAAs) undergoing surgery on the TAA or TAAA was monitored with tcMEP and SEP. Spinal cord protection was achieved by means of a multimodality approach: moderate hypothermia (32 degrees C rectal temperature), continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage to keep the pressure less than 10 mm Hg, reimplantation of intercostal arteries, left ventricular bypass grafting, and staged clamping. In the case of evoked potential changes more than 50% of baseline, the strategy was adjusted: reattachment of more segmental arteries when technically feasible, higher distal and proximal perfusion pressures, and enhanced cerebrospinal fluid drainage. RESULTS: Forty-two of 118 patients (35.6%) had a more than 50% of baseline tcMEP reduction during cross-clamping. At this point, only 5 of those 42 cases were also associated with SEP reduction of more than 50% of baseline. On the basis of the tcMEP findings, the strategy was adjusted. Five patients had postoperative paraplegia (4.2%). CONCLUSION: tcMEP monitoring seems to be a useful adjunct of the protective techniques and may cause substantial adjustments in strategy, reducing the incidence of postoperative paraplegia.     

Surgical treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Spinal cord injury such as paraparesis and paraplegia remains one of the major concerns in surgery on the thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). We utilize spinal cord protection including cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), adjuncts of aortic distal perfusion, reconstruction of the intercostal or lumbar arteries and deep hypothermia in TAAA repair. This report describes the results of surgical treatment for TAAA including postoperative neurological outcome. Between October 1999 and January 2004, 33 patients (mean age 66 years; range 26 to 81) underwent TAAA repair. Adamkiewicz artery could be detected using magnetic resonance angiography in 9 patients. CSFD was done in 20 patients. TAAA repair was achieved using adjuncts of aortic distal perfusion in 31 patients (partial cardiopulmonary bypass: 19, deep hypothermia: 9, left heart bypass: 3). We tried to reconstruct the intercostal or lumbar arteries which were located between Th8 and L2 as possible. Twenty-five patients underwent reconstruction of the intercostal or lumbar arteries. There were 6 hospital deaths. Postoperative spinal cord injury occurred in 4 patients (paraparesis: 1, paraplegia: 3). This clinical experience demonstrates that current technical strategies enable patients to undergo TAAA repair with acceptable early survival. However, despite aggressive spinal cord protection, few patients suffered from postoperative spinal cord injury. Future research should focus on spinal cord protection in patients with TAAA.     

Experimental and clinical assessment of the adequacy of partial bypass in maintenance of spinal cord blood flow during operations on the thoracic aorta

We studied both experimentally and clinically the efficacy of partial bypass techniques in maintaining spinal cord blood flow and physiological function during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. We attempted to define the level of distal aortic pressure required to safely ensure normal neurological function in the absence of critical intercostal occlusion. Six dogs underwent left thoracotomy with baseline measurements of spinal cord blood flow and spinal cord impulse conduction (somatosensory evoked potentials). Following exclusion of the entire descending thoracic aorta from the left subclavian artery to the T-13 level, partial left atrium-femoral artery bypass was instituted, and baseline levels of proximal and distal aortic pressure were maintained during a 30-minute stabilization period. Mean distal aortic pressure then was progressively altered at 30-minute intervals to 100, 70, and 40 mm Hg. Measurements of spinal cord blood flow and somatosensory evoked potential were repeated at the end of each interval for comparison with baseline. No significant changes in spinal cord blood flow or somatosensory evoked potential were observed in any animal with a distal aortic pressure greater than or equal to 70 mm Hg. With a pressure of 40 mm Hg, normal flow and somatosensory evoked potentials were maintained in 5 of the 6 dogs. Loss of somatosensory evoked potential, with simultaneous loss of spinal cord blood flow at the T-6 level, occurred in 1 dog. Restoration of distal aortic pressure to 70 mm Hg in all animals resulted in immediate return of somatosensory evoked potential. Loss of somatosensory evoked potential routinely occurred in animals with a distal aortic pressure less than 40 mm Hg. Clinically, 9 patients have undergone operation for lesions of the thoracoabdominal aorta using shunt or bypass techniques. Normal somatosensory evoked potentials were preserved in 7 patients with maintenance of adequate distal aortic pressure (greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg) without evidence of postoperative neurological deficit. Two patients showed hypotensive somatosensory evoked potential loss (distal aortic pressure less than 40 mm Hg). Prolonged distal hypotension (85 minutes of aortic cross-clamping) in the latter resulted in paraplegia. We conclude that maintenance of a distal aortic pressure greater than 60 to 70 mm Hg will uniformly preserve spinal cord blood flow in the absence of critical intercostal exclusion. Should distal aortic pressure be inadequate, early reversible changes in the somatosensory evoked potential will alert the surgeon. Failure to institute measures to reverse these changes may result in paraplegia.     

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. IV. Clinical observations and results

Thirty-three patients undergoing operations on the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored to evaluate causes and effects of spinal cord ischemia as manifested by changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. Maintenance of distal aortic perfusion pressure (greater than 60 mm Hg) by either shunt or bypass techniques in 17 patients resulted in preservation of somatosensory evoked potentials and a normal postoperative neurologic status, irrespective of the interval of thoracic cross-clamping (range 23 to 105 minutes). In 16 other patients in whom cross-clamp time ranged from 16 to 124 minutes, evoked potential loss was observed because of failure to provide distal perfusion (n = 8), inadequate maintenance of distal perfusion pressure (less than 60 mm Hg) despite shunt/bypass (n = 6), or interruption of critical intercostal arteries (n = 2). Incidence of paraplegia in the entire group was 15.1% (5/33) and was limited to only those patients in whom evoked potential loss occurred (5/16, 31.2%) (p = 0.02). Loss of somatosensory evoked potentials for more than 30 minutes resulted in a 71.2% (5/7) incidence of paraplegia, whereas no neurologic deficit was noted in patients (0/26) in whom evoked potential loss was either prevented or limited in duration to 30 minutes (p less than 0.001 versus loss for more than 30 minutes). Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials is a sensitive indicator of spinal cord ischemia. Simple aortic cross-clamping, failure to maintain distal perfusion pressure above 60 mm Hg, and inability to reimplant critical intercostals in a timely fashion result in a high rate of paraplegia if duration of spinal cord ischemia as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials exceeds 30 minutes. Routine evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal procedures appears useful in assessing the adequacy of spinal cord perfusion. Furthermore, it can alert the surgeon to the necessity for critical intercostal artery reimplantation as well as the need for adjustment or regulation of distal aortic perfusion.     

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. II. Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to assess adequacy of distal aortic bypass and perfusion after thoracic aortic cross-clamping

Pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass was instituted after aortic cross-clamping distal to the left subclavian artery in a canine experimental model to determine the relationship of distal aortic perfusion pressure with spinal cord blood flow and somatosensory evoked potentials. In six animals (Group I) distal aortic perfusion pressure was maintained at 100 mm Hg throughout a 1 hour interval of aortic cross-clamping. During this period, somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow (radioactive microspheres) showed no significant change from baseline. In six other dogs (Group II) distal aortic perfusion pressure was initially maintained at 100 mm Hg after aortic cross-clamping and then progressively decreased to 70, 40, and 25 mm Hg. Somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow were preserved at baseline levels for all distal perfusion pressures greater than 70 mm Hg. At 40 mm Hg, abnormalities in amplitude of the somatosensory evoked potentials were noted in all animals with progression to complete loss of evoked potential activity at lower perfusion pressures. Maintenance of adequate somatosensory spinal cord conduction after thoracic aortic cross-clamping is dependent on a critical level of distal aortic perfusion that can be accomplished by use of an adjunct such as pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass. The critical level of distal aortic perfusion pressure to maintain normal somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow in this canine experimental study was 70 mm Hg or greater. Because inadequate distal aortic perfusion can be easily detected by monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials, these techniques should prove helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of distal perfusion techniques during clinical aortic cross-clamping for procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta.     

Effect of sodium nitroprusside on spinal cord perfusion and paraplegia during aortic cross-clamping

To evaluate the effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on hemodynamics, cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and neurological outcome after 30 minutes of thoracic aortic occlusion, we monitored proximal and distal blood pressure, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, spinal cord blood flow, and somatosensory evoked potentials. In group 1 (n = 6), no attempts were made to control proximal hypertension, whereas in group 2 (n = 6), proximal blood pressure was controlled with intravenous infusion of SNP. There was no significant difference in proximal or distal blood pressure or cerebrospinal fluid pressure between the two groups at baseline. During the crossclamp interval, the mean proximal aortic pressure rose from 108 +/- 21 to 146 +/- 14 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) in the control group, whereas the mean blood pressure in the SNP group was maintained at 99.8 +/- 12 mm Hg (p = not significant compared with baseline blood pressure). Mean distal aortic pressure decreased from systemic values to 23 +/- 7 mm Hg in control animals and to 11 +/- 5 mm Hg in the SNP group (p less than 0.005). In the latter group, cerebrospinal fluid pressure increased significantly from 10.6 +/- 1.9 to 20.1 +/- 5.5 mm Hg (p less than 0.005). In animals receiving SNP, spinal cord blood flow was decreased in the lower spinal cord segments and increased in the upper cord segments. When compared with controls, this difference did not reach significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preventive effect of Fluosol-DA for paraplegia encountered after surgical treatment of the thoracic aorta. Preliminary results in a dog model

The effectiveness of Fluosol-DA (Green Cross Corporation, Osaka, Japan) on circulatory dynamics and neurologic outcome in dogs with ischemic spinal cord injury produced by aortic crossclamping was tested. The control group (receiving saline solution) had an elevated mean aortic proximal pressure (112.9 +/- 30.2 mm Hg versus 175.3 +/- 20.5 mm Hg, p greater than 0.05) and a drastic drop in mean distal aortic pressure (112.9 +/- 30.2 mm Hg versus 29.8 +/- 11.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Although the same trend occurred in dogs treated prophylactically with Fluosol-DA, these changes were not statistically significant. However, there was a significant difference in mean distal aortic pressure during the ischemic phase between the two groups (58.9 +/- 16.0 mm Hg versus 29.8 +/- 11.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Postoperatively all animals had mean arterial pressures within the normal range. All dogs in the control group were paraplegic (partial or complete); the treatment group had one dog with partial paraplegia. The difference between the mean neurologic scores of the two groups was of high statistical significance (3.7 +/- 0.5 versus 1.6 +/- 1.0, p less than 0.05). Our preliminary results show that prophylactic use of Fluosol-DA has favorable effects on hemodynamics and neurologic outcome in dogs with spinal cord ischemia produced by aortic crossclamping. The high propensity of the drug to carry oxygen and carbon dioxide and to provide nutritional support to the ischemic area with resultant improvement in local microcirculation and blood rheology are some speculative mechanisms advocated for these changes.     

Prevention of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic aortic occlusion

Paraplegia has been a devastating and unpredictable complication following surgical procedures necessitating temporary occlusion of the thoracic aorta. This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of the pressure gradient between the aortic pressure distal to the occlusion and cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), defined as "Relative spinal cord perfusion pressure" (RSPP) on the development of ischemia to the spinal cord by using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). In 30 mongrel dogs, the thoracic aorta just distal to the left subclavian artery was occluded for either 30 or 120 minutes until SEP disappeared. RSPP was maintained at 20, 30 or 40 mmHg in each dog by adjusting the degree of occlusion of th aorta and/or changing CSFP by withdrawal of cerebrospinal fluid or injection of normal saline into the subarachnoid space. SEP were recorded as a cortical response to the electrical stimulation of bilateral peroneal nerves. SEP did not disappear for 30 or 120 minutes when RSPP was 40 mmHg. It would be concluded that 40 mmHg or higher of RSPP is necessary in order to prevent the spinal cord ischemia due to the temporary occlusion of the thoracic aorta.