共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
Johannes Bachler Johannes Giebelmann Thomas Loerting 《Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America》2021,118(30)
The nature of amorphous ices has been debated for more than 35 years. In essence, the question is whether they are related to ice polymorphs or to liquids. The fact that amorphous ices are traditionally prepared from crystalline ice via pressure-induced amorphization has made a clear distinction tricky. In this work, we vitrify liquid droplets through cooling at ≥106 K ⋅ s−1 and pressurize the glassy deposit. We observe a first order–like densification upon pressurization and recover a high-density glass. The two glasses resemble low- and high-density amorphous ice in terms of both structure and thermal properties. Vitrified water shows all features that have been reported for amorphous ices made from crystalline ice. The only difference is that the hyperquenched and pressurized deposit shows slightly different crystallization kinetics to ice I upon heating at ambient pressure. This implies a thermodynamically continuous connection of amorphous ices with liquids, not crystals. 相似文献
2.
3.
The paper presents a CNC component manufacturing process using the WAAM process. The study depicts all the execution steps of a component from the CAD drawing, deposition procedure (technological parameters, times, layers, etc.), examination, and economic calculation. The manufacturing of this component using WAAM is more advantageous given the fact that the execution time and delivery are significantly shorter, mainly when a single piece is required and also when discussing the raw material used, usually expensive titanium alloys. For example, for Ti-6AI-V used in the aircraft industry, for which the material price is about 90 Euro/kg, the costs for obtaining a given component using the WAAM process will be about 497 Euro/piece compared to 1657 Euro/piece when using another manufacturing process, as it is shown in this paper. In conclusion, additive manufacturing can easily become a feasible solution for several industrial applications when it replaces a classic manufacturing process of a single component or replacement products, even simple-shaped. 相似文献
4.
Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing (ADAM) is an innovative Additive Manufacturing process that allows the manufacture of complex parts in metallic material, such as copper among others, which provides new opportunities in Rapid Tooling. This work presents the development of a copper electrode manufactured with ADAM technology for Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) and its performance compared to a conventional electrolytic copper. Density, electrical conductivity and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were performed for an initial analysis of both ADAM and electrolytic electrodes. Previously designed EDM experiments and optimizations using genetic algorithms were carried out to establish a comparative framework for both electrodes. Subsequently, the final EDM tests were carried out to evaluate the electrode wear rate, the roughness of the workpiece and the rate of material removal for both electrodes. The EDM results show that ADAM technology enables the manufacturing of functional EDM electrodes with similar material removal rates and rough workpiece finishes to conventional electrodes, but with greater electrode wear, mainly due to internal porosity, voids and other defects observed with field emission scanning electron microscopy. 相似文献
5.
6.
Screen-additive manufacturing (SAM) is a potential method for producing small intricate parts without waste generation, offering minimal production cost. A wide range of materials, including gels, can be shaped using this method. A gel material is composed of a three-dimensional cross-linked polymer or colloidal network immersed in a fluid, known as hydrogel when its main constituent fluid is water. Hydrogels are capable of absorbing and retaining large amounts of water. Cellulose gel is among the materials that can form hydrogels and, as shown in this work, has the required properties to be directly SAM, including shear thinning and formation of post-shearing gel structure. In this study, we present the developed method of SAM for the fabrication of complex-shaped cellulose gel and examine whether successive printing layers can be completed without delamination. In addition, we evaluated cellulose SAM without the need for support material. Design of Experiments (DoE) was applied to optimize the SAM settings for printing the novel cellulose-based gel structure. The optimum print settings were then used to print a periodic structure with micro features and without the need for support material. 相似文献
7.
Virginia Uralde Alfredo Suarez Eider Aldalur Fernando Veiga Tomas Ballesteros 《Materials》2022,15(17)
Direct energy deposition is gaining much visibility in research as one of the most adaptable additive manufacturing technologies for industry due to its ease of application and high deposition rates. The possibility of combining these materials to obtain parts with variable mechanical properties is an important task to be studied. The combination of two types of steel, mild steel ER70-6 and stainless steel SS 316L, for the fabrication of a wall by direct energy deposition was studied for this paper. The separate fabrication of these two materials was studied for the microstructurally flawless fabrication of bimetallic walls. As a result of the application of superimposed and overlapped strategies, two walls were fabricated and the microstructure, mechanical properties and hardness of the resulting walls are analyzed. The walls obtained with both strategies present dissimilar regions; the hardness where the most present material is ER70-6 is around 380 HV, and for SS 316L, it is around 180 HV. The average values of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) are 869 and 628 MPa, yield strength (YS) are 584 and 389 MPa and elongation at break are 20% and 36%, respectively, in the cases where we have more ER70-6 in the sample than SS 316L. This indicates an important relationship between the distribution of the materials and their mechanical behavior. 相似文献
8.
Additive manufacturing (AM) has the advantages of reducing material usage and geometrical complexity compared to subtractive manufacturing. Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is an additive manufacturing process that can be used to rapidly manufacture medium-and large-sized products. This study deals with the path-planning strategy in WAAM, which can affect the quality of deposited components. It aims at suggesting effective path planning to reduce the height error of intersection parts. A comparative analysis of the bead width and height at the intersection parts was performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed path. The initial parameters were determined through single-layer deposition experiments, and multi-layer deposition experiments were performed. The resultant height error in the intersection part was 0.8%, while that in the non-intersection part was absent at the maximum height. Path planning is considered to be an effective method. 相似文献
9.
Sebastian Kuschmitz Arne Schirp Johannes Busse Hagen Watschke Claudia Schirp Thomas Vietor 《Materials》2021,14(9)
Additive manufacturing, especially material extrusion (MEX), has received a lot of attention recently. The reasons for this are the numerous advantages compared to conventional manufacturing processes, which result in various new possibilities for product development and -design. By applying material layer by layer, parts with complex, load-path optimized geometries can be manufactured at neutral costs. To expand the application fields of MEX, high-strength and simultaneously lightweight materials are required which fulfill the requirements of highly resilient technical parts. For instance, the embedding of continuous carbon and flax fibers in a polymer matrix offers great potential for this. To achieve the highest possible variability with regard to the material combinations while ensuring simple and economical production, the fiber–matrix bonding should be carried out in one process step together with the actual parts manufacture. This paper deals with the adaptation and improvement of the 3D printer on the one hand and the characterization of 3D printed test specimens based on carbon and flax fibers on the other hand. For this purpose, the print head development for in-situ processing of contin uous fiber-reinforced parts with improved mechanical properties is described. It was determined that compared to neat polylactic acid (PLA), the continuous fiber-reinforced test specimens achieve up to 430% higher tensile strength and 890% higher tensile modulus for the carbon fiber reinforcement and an increase of up to 325% in tensile strength and 570% in tensile modulus for the flax fibers. Similar improvements in performance were achieved in the bending tests. 相似文献
10.
Yoshio Kono Curtis Kenney-Benson Daijo Ikuta Yuki Shibazaki Yanbin Wang Guoyin Shen 《Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America》2016,113(13):3436-3441
Knowledge of pressure-induced structural changes in glasses is important in various scientific fields as well as in engineering and industry. However, polyamorphism in glasses under high pressure remains poorly understood because of experimental challenges. Here we report new experimental findings of ultrahigh-pressure polyamorphism in GeO2 glass, investigated using a newly developed double-stage large-volume cell. The Ge–O coordination number (CN) is found to remain constant at ∼6 between 22.6 and 37.9 GPa. At higher pressures, CN begins to increase rapidly and reaches 7.4 at 91.7 GPa. This transformation begins when the oxygen-packing fraction in GeO2 glass is close to the maximal dense-packing state (the Kepler conjecture = ∼0.74), which provides new insights into structural changes in network-forming glasses and liquids with CN higher than 6 at ultrahigh-pressure conditions.Understanding the structural response of network-forming glasses to pressure is of great interest not only in condensed matter physics, geoscience, and materials science, but also in engineering and industry. As prototype network-forming glasses, silica (SiO2) and germania (GeO2) have been the most extensively studied (1–5). These two glasses have similar structural change pathways at high pressures. At ambient pressure, both glasses are composed of corner-linked AO4 tetrahedra, with atom A (Si or Ge) in fourfold coordination (6). Under compression, the coordination gradually changes from 4 to 6 over a wide pressure range [∼15–40 GPa for SiO2 glass (2, 4) and ∼5–15 GPa for GeO2 glass (1, 3, 5)].A recent study (7) found that evolution of network-forming structural motifs in glasses and liquids at high pressures can be rationalized in terms of oxygen-packing fraction (OPF). Fourfold-coordinated structural motifs in SiO2 and GeO2 glasses are stable over a wide range of OPF between 0.40 and ∼0.59. The fourfold-coordinated structural motifs become unstable when the OPF approaches the limit of random loose packing of hard spheres (0.55–0.60) (8, 9). When OPF >∼0.60, coordination number (CN) gradually increases with OPF to the limit of random close packing (0.64) (8, 9), where CN increases sharply to 6 with almost-constant OPF ∼0.64. Higher-pressure data for SiO2 glass suggest the existence of another stability plateau for sixfold-coordinated structural motifs, with OPF of up to ∼0.72 (7).The highest coordination that has been experimentally determined so far in SiO2 and GeO2 glasses is 6. X-ray diffraction measurement for SiO2 glass confirmed that sixfold-coordination structural motifs are stable up to 100 GPa (4). For GeO2 glass, X-ray and neutron diffraction data are limited to 18 GPa (1, 3, 5). X-ray absorption spectroscopic measurements were conducted to 64 GPa (10, 11). Ref. 11 showed no major change in X-ray absorption fine structure up to 64 GPa, although a slight discontinuous change in density is observed around 40–45 GPa.Some simulation studies predicted the existence of structural motifs with CN >6 above ∼100 GPa for SiO2 liquid (12) and glass (13) and above ∼60 GPa for GeO2 glass (13), with no experimental confirmation so far. A study (14) of SiO2 glass using Brillouin scattering in a diamond anvil cell (DAC) showed a kink in the pressure dependence of shear-wave velocity at ∼140 GPa and was interpreted as evidence of ultrahigh-pressure polyamorphism in SiO2. However, no structural information is available under such high pressures. In this study, we developed a new double-stage cell, which enables us to study structure of GeO2 glass at in situ high-pressure conditions up to 91.7 GPa.Large-volume samples are vital for accurate measurements on the structure of glasses at high pressures using X-ray diffraction because of the weak X-ray scattering from amorphous materials. In such measurements, a large diffraction angle is essential for accurately determining the structure factor with sufficiently large coverage of momentum transfer Q (Q = 4πEsinθ/12.398, where E is X-ray energy in keV and θ is the diffraction angle), and for high resolution in the reduced pair distribution function in real space. Recently, generation of pressure up to 94 GPa has been achieved in a DAC with 1-mm culet size anvils (15). However, this large-volume DAC is designed for neutron diffraction measurement; it is difficult to apply this apparatus for X-ray diffraction measurement because of limited solid-angle access. Similarly, there have been attempts to generate high pressures by inserting diamond anvils inside multianvil large-volume presses (16, 17). However, multianvil presses generally have even more limited solid-angle access for X-ray diffraction signals.We have developed a new double-stage Paris–Edinburgh (PE)-type large-volume press to generate high pressures with large sample volume (Fig. 1A). A pair of second-stage diamond anvils is introduced into the first-stage PE anvils. This combination of opposed anvils (both first- and second stage) provides a large opening in the horizontal plane for X-ray diffraction measurement. To reduce absorption of the gasket surrounding the sample, we used a cubic boron nitride + epoxy (10:1 in weight ratio) inner gasket with an aluminum alloy (7075) outer gasket, both of which are low X-ray absorbing, light-element materials. The diamond anvils had a culet diameter of 0.8 mm. The large culet size allowed us to use large samples 0.3 mm in diameter and 0.15 mm in height. In our study on structure of GeO2 glass, this new double-stage cell has reached pressures up to 91.7 GPa (Fig. 1B), where sample size was ∼0.24 mm in diameter and ∼0.06 mm in height, as determined by in situ X-ray radiography imaging (Fig. 1C).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Newly developed double-stage large-volume cell. (A) Illustration of double-stage large-volume cell design. We use cup-shaped PE-type anvil as the first-stage anvil, and the second-stage diamond anvil is introduced inside the large-volume cell assembly. (B) Pressure generation as a function of oil load of the PE press. Solid symbols represent pressure conditions of structure measurement of GeO2 glass measured before and after structural measurement. Oil pressure was found to decrease slightly after each measurement, whereas sample pressure increased slightly. Error of pressure is smaller than the size of the symbol. (C) X-ray radiography image of the GeO2 glass sample and Au pressure standard through gasket at 91.7 GPa.Structure of GeO2 glass was investigated using the newly designed double-stage PE press with multiangle energy dispersive X-ray diffraction technique at Beamline 16-BM-B, High Pressure Collaborative Access Team (HPCAT) of the Advanced Photon Source (18). Structure factors, S(Q), were obtained up to 13 Å−1 (Fig. 2). The position of the first sharp diffraction peak (FSDP) in S(Q) shows essentially no pressure dependence between 22.6 and 37.9 GPa. Previous studies (3, 19) show that below ∼10 GPa, FSDP moves rapidly with increasing pressure toward higher Q values; above 10 GPa, the position becomes virtually pressure independent. This is consistent with our observation that the FSDP shifts rapidly from 0 to 22.6 GPa, and then remains almost constant between 22.6 and 37.9 GPa (Fig. 2). Interestingly, with further increase of pressure to 72.5 GPa, the FSDP begins shifting again toward higher Q and then becomes virtually constant once more between 72.5 and 91.7 GPa. Furthermore, a new peak at Q ∼ 7.1–7.3 Å-1 begins to emerge at a pressure between 22.6 and 37.9 GPa, with increasing intensity at higher pressures.Open in a separate windowFig. 2.Structure factor, S(Q), of GeO2 glass up to 91.7 GPa. S(Q) was determined at the Q range up to 13 Å-1. S(Q) at high pressure is displayed by a vertical offset of 0.4, with varying pressure, and S(Q) at ambient pressure is displayed by a vertical offset of −2. The dotted line is plotted at the first peak position at 22.6 GPa to guide the eyes. The first peak position is almost the same at 22.6 and 37.9 GPa, whereas it shifts to high Q at 49.4–72.5 GPa.Fourier transformation of S(Q) yields real-space pair distribution function (20), G(r) (Fig. 3). The first and second peak of G(r) in GeO2 glass is generally considered to represent Ge–O and Ge–Ge distance, respectively. Significant changes in peak shape and positions in G(r), particularly in the second peak, are evident. G(r) obtained at 22.6 and 37.9 GPa show a distinct shoulder at the lower “r” side of the second peak. This shoulder has been observed in previous studies (1, 3, 5) at pressures higher than ∼15 GPa. This double-peak feature is considered to represent two Ge–Ge distances in the sixfold-coordinated GeO2 structure. In contrast, we find that the second peak starts to become a single peak above 49.4 GPa. The second peak width markedly decreases between 37.9 and 49.4 GPa, although the second peak in G(r) at 49.4 and 61.4 GPa still shows a weak shoulder at the low-r side. The second peak becomes a single peak above 72.5 GPa.Open in a separate windowFig. 3.Pair distribution function, G(r), of GeO2 glass up to 91.7 GPa. G(r) at high pressures are displayed by additional vertical offset of 0.4, with varying pressure, and that at ambient pressure is displayed by an offset of −2.3. G(r) at 22.6 and 37.9 GPa show distinct two shoulders in the second peak, which is considered as an evidence of sixfold-coordinated GeO2 glass structure (1, 3, 5), whereas it gradually becomes a single peak above 49.4 GPa.Fig. 4 shows the pressure dependence of the first and second peak positions in G(r), with the numerical results summarized in Open in a separate windowFig. 4.The first and second peak position of G(r). (A) The first peak position of G(r) of GeO2 glass obtained in this study (solid red squares), compared with Ge–O bond distance of crystalline GeO2 with CaCl2-type structure (21) (open and solid blue diamonds) and pyrite-type structure (24) (open and solid blue squares). Blue cross symbols represent the median value of the two Ge–O bond distances in CaCl2-type GeO2. Error is smaller than the size of the symbol. (B) The second peak position of G(r) of GeO2 glass obtained in this study (red squares), compared with Ge–Ge bond distance of crystalline GeO2 with CaCl2-type structure (21) (open and solid blue diamonds) and pyrite-type structure (24) (solid blue square). Solid red squares represent the main second peak (r2) and open red squares represent shoulder peaks in the second peak at ∼2.7–2.8 Å (r2s) (Pressure (GPa) r1, Å r2s, Å r2, Å CN 0.0 1.738 ± 0.001 3.177 ± 0.01 4.0 ± 0.2 22.6 ± 0.4 1.846 ± 0.003 2.823 ± 0.02 3.209 ± 0.01 5.8 ± 0.2 37.9 ± 1.0 1.820 ± 0.001 2.795 ± 0.02 3.245 ± 0.02 5.9 ± 0.2 49.4 ± 1.3 1.824 ± 0.001 2.728 ± 0.02 3.149 ± 0.03 6.4 ± 0.2 61.4 ± 0.9 1.833 ± 0.001 2.734 ± 0.03 3.130 ± 0.03 7.0 ± 0.2 72.5 ± 1.1 1.814 ± 0.001 3.033 ± 0.12 7.0 ± 0.2 80.4 ± 0.3 1.813 ± 0.001 3.011 ± 0.01 7.1 ± 0.2 91.7 ± 0.6 1.810 ± 0.001 2.937 ± 0.06 7.4 ± 0.2