Effect of reconstruction algorithms on myocardial blood flow measurement with 13N-ammonia PET.

Filtered backprojection (FBP) is the traditional method for 13N-NH3 PET studies. Ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) is popular for PET studies because of better noise properties. Scant data exist on the effect of reconstruction algorithms on quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimation. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent dynamic acquisition rest/stress 13N-NH3 studies. In Part 1, 19 rest/stress image pairs were reconstructed by FBP (10-mm Hanning filter) and by OSEM with 28 subsets and 2 (OSEM2), 6 (OSEM6), or 8 iterations (OSEM8), and a 10-mm postreconstruction smoothing gaussian filter. In Part 2, 9 image pairs were reconstructed by FBP (10-mm Hanning filter) and by OSEM with 28 subsets, 8 iterations, and a gaussian 5-, 10-, or 15-mm postreconstruction smoothing filter. Average MBF (mL/min/mL of myocardium) was calculated using a 3-compartment model. RESULTS: Part 1: For rest MBF, the correlations between FBP and each of the OSEM algorithms were r2 = 0.71, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively. MBF by OSEM6 (0.98 +/- 0.48 [mean +/- SD]) and OSEM8 (0.96 +/- 0.46) was not significantly different from FBP (1.02 +/- 0.39), but OSEM2 (0.80 +/- 0.37) was significantly lower (P < 0.0003). With stress, the correlations were high between FBP and OSEM6 and OSEM8 (r2 = 0.85 and 0.90), and MBF by OSEM6 and OSEM8 was not significantly different from FBP. Part 2: Resting MBF correlated well between FBP and all OSEM smoothing filters (r2 = 0.82, 0.85, and 0.88). Rest MBF using postsmoothing 5- or 10-mm filters was not different from FBP but was significantly lower with the 15-mm filter (P < 0.05). With stress, the correlations were good between FBP and OSEM regardless of smoothing (r2 = 0.76, 0.77, and 0.79). However, MBF with postsmoothing 10- and 15-mm filters was significantly lower than by FBP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction algorithms significantly affect the estimation of quantitative blood flow data and should not be assumed to be interchangeable. Although aggressive smoothing may produce visually appealing images with reduced noise levels, it may cause an underestimation of absolute quantitative MBF. In selecting a reconstruction algorithm, an optimal balance between noise properties and diagnostic accuracy must be emphasized.     

Gated cardiac 13N-NH3 PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction: comparison with electrocardiography-gated 18F-FDG PET.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate myocardial electrocardiography (ECG)-gated 13N-ammonia (13N-NH3) PET for the assessment of cardiac end-diastolic volume (EDV), cardiac end-systolic volume (ESV), left ventricular (LV) myocardial mass (LVMM), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) with gated 18F-FDG PET as a reference method. METHODS: ECG-gated 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDG scans were performed for 27 patients (23 men and 4 women; mean+/-SD age, 55+/-15 y) for the evaluation of myocardial perfusion and viability. For both 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDG studies, a model-based image analysis tool was used to estimate endocardial and epicardial borders of the left ventricle on a set of short-axis images and to calculate values for EDV, ESV, LVEF, and LVMM. RESULTS: The LV volumes determined by 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDG were 108+/-60 mL and 106+/-63 mL for ESV and 175+/-71 mL and 169+/-73 mL for EDV, respectively. The LVEFs determined by 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDG were 42%+/-13% and 41%+/-13%, respectively. The LVMMs determined by 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDG were 179+/-40 g and 183+/-43 g, respectively. All P values were not significant, as determined by paired t tests. A significant correlation was observed between 13N-NH3 imaging and 18F-FDG imaging for the calculation of ESV (r=0.97, SEE=14.1, P<0.0001), EDV (r=0.98, SEE=15.4, P<0.0001), LVEF (r=0.9, SEE=5.6, P<0.0001), and LVMM (r=0.93, SEE=15.5, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Model-based analysis of ECG-gated 13N-NH3 PET images is accurate in determining LV volumes, LVMM, and LVEF. Therefore, ECG-gated 13N-NH3 can be used for the simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion, LV geometry, and contractile function.     

Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blood flow and ejection fraction with a single dose of (13)NH(3) and Gated PET.

To evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF) and cardiac function with a single dose of (13)NH(3), electrocardiographically (ECG) gated PET acquisition was performed after a dynamic PET scan was obtained. Gated blood-pool (GBP) imaging with C(15)O PET was also performed to compare the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained using the 2 methods. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers and 34 patients with cardiovascular disease were studied. Each subject underwent dynamic PET scanning after a slow intravenous injection of approximately 740 MBq (13)NH(3), followed by ECG gated PET scanning. MBF images were calculated by the Patlak plot method. Before obtaining the (13)NH(3) scan, the GBP image was obtained with a bolus inhalation of C(15)O. Twenty patients also underwent left ventriculography (LVG) to compare the value of the LVEF obtained using this technique with that determined using the gated PET method. RESULTS: The mean regional value of MBF calculated for healthy volunteers in the resting condition was 0.61 +/- 0.10 mL/min/g. The LVEF obtained using GBP PET (EF(CO)) was consistent with that obtained using LVG. The LVEF calculated from gated (13)NH(3) scans (EF(NH3)) correlated well with EF(CO), although EF(NH3) slightly underestimated the LVEF (EF(NH3) = 0.97. EF(CO) - 2.94; r = 0.87). EF(NH3) was significantly different from EF(CO) in patients with a perfusion defect in the cardiac wall (EF(NH3) = 39% +/- 11% vs. EF(CO) = 45% +/- 11%; n = 19; P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between them in subjects with no defect (EF(NH3) = 58% +/- 13% vs. EF(CO) = 61% +/- 10%; n = 21). CONCLUSION: Gated PET acquisition accompanied by obtaining a dynamic PET scan with a single dose of (13)NH(3) is a promising method for the simultaneous clinical evaluation of MBF and cardiac function. However, in patients with a defect in the cardiac wall, EF(NH3) showed a tendency to underestimate the EF compared with EF(CO).     

Direct comparison between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional PET acquisition modes for myocardial blood flow absolute quantification with O-15 water and N-13 ammonia

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography scanners with retractable septa allow both 3-dimensional (3D) and 2-dimensional (2D) acquisition modes. The study aim was to directly compare 2D and 3D acquisition modes for the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) over a wide range of flow values. METHODS AND RESULTS: Instrumentation was used in 4 dogs to reduce the left circumflex artery lumen by greater than 75%. During infusion of adenosine, MBF was measured with both 2D and 3D dynamic acquisition and both oxygen 15 water and nitrogen 13 ammonia. Injected activities were 333 MBq and 111 MBq for 2D acquisition and 3D acquisition, respectively. Data were reconstructed by analytic methods, and MBF was assessed by use of an 18-segment model. MBF values ranged from 0.4 to 5.8 mL x g(-1) x min(-1) with O-15 water and from 0.3 to 3.9 mL x g(-1) x min(-1) with N-13 ammonia. No significant differences were observed in absolute MBF values obtained with the 2 acquisition modes, regardless of the flow tracer used. Two-dimensionally and three-dimensionally derived MBF values were significantly strongly correlated by use of both O-15 water (y = 0.98x + 0.18, r = 0.87, P < .001) and N-13 ammonia (y = 0.99x + 0.09, r = 0.95, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Quantification of MBF in dogs with 3D positron emission tomography provides results similar to those obtained with the 2D technique, despite a lower activity being injected.     

Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: Comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models

BACKGROUND: Measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) by dynamic nitrogen 13 ammonia (NH(3)) positron emission tomography (PET) uses tracer kinetic modeling to analyze time-activity curves. We compared 2 commonly used models with 2 compartments (2C) and 3 compartments (3C) for quantification of MBF and coronary flow reserve (CFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients underwent NH(3) PET at rest and during hyperemia. Time-activity curves for blood pool and myocardial segments were obtained from short-axis images of dynamic sequences. Model fitting of the 2C and 3C models was performed to estimate regional MBF. MBF values calculated by 2C and 3C models were 0.98 +/- 0.31 mL.min(-1).g(-1) and 1.11 +/- 0.37 mL.min(-1).g(-1), respectively, at rest (P < .0001) and 2.79 +/- 1.18 mL.min(-1).g(-1) and 2.46 +/- 1.02 mL.min(-1).g(-1), respectively, during hyperemia (P < .01), resulting in a CFR of 3.02 +/- 1.31 and 2.39 +/- 1.15 (P < .0001), respectively. Significant correlation was observed between the 2 models for calculation of resting MBF (r = 0.78), hyperemic MBF (r = 0.68), and CFR (r = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Measurements of MBF and CFR by 2C and 3C models are significantly related. However, quantification of MBF and CFR significantly differs between the methods. This difference needs to be considered when normal values are established or when measurements obtained with different methods need to be compared.     

Reproducibility of measurements of regional myocardial blood flow in a model of coronary artery disease: Comparison of H215O and 13NH3 PET techniques.

PET absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) with H(2)15O and 13NH3 are widely used in clinical and research settings. However, their reproducibility with a 16-myocardial segment model has not been examined in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined the short-term reproducibility of PET H(2)15O MBF and PET 13NH3 MBF in an animal model of chronic CAD. METHODS: Twelve swine (mean weight +/- SD, 38 +/- 5 kg) underwent percutaneous placement of a copper stent in the mid circumflex coronary artery, resulting in an intense inflammatory fibrotic reaction with luminal stenosis at 4 wk. Each animal underwent repeated resting MBF measurements by PET H(2)15O and PET 13NH3. Attenuation-corrected images were analyzed using commercial software to yield absolute MBF (mL/min/g) in 16 myocardial segments. MBF was also normalized to the rate.pressure product (RPP). RESULTS: By Bland-Altman reproducibility plots, the mean difference was 0.01 +/- 0.18 mL/min/g and 0.01 +/- 0.11 mL/min/g, with confidence limits of +/-0.36 and +/-0.22 mL/min/g for uncorrected regional PET H(2)15O MBF and for uncorrected regional PET 13NH3 MBF, respectively. The repeatability coefficient ranged from 0.09 to 0.43 mL/min/g for H(2)15O and from 0.09 to 0.18 mL/min/g for 13NH3 regional MBF. RPP correction did not improve reproducibility for either PET H(2)15O or PET 13NH3 MBF. The mean difference in PET H(2)15O MBF was 0.03 +/- 0.14 mL/min/g and 0.02 +/- 0.19 mL/min/g for infarcted and remote regions, respectively, and in PET 13NH3 MBF was 0.03 +/- 0.11 mL/min/g and 0.00 +/- 0.09 mL/min/g for infarcted and remote regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET H(2)15O and PET 13NH3 resting MBF showed excellent reproducibility in a closed-chest animal model of chronic CAD. Resting PET 13NH3 MBF was more reproducible than resting PET H(2)15O MBF. A high level of reproducibility was maintained in areas of lower flow with infarction for both isotopes.     

Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging.

We compared 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) (82)Rb PET imaging in 3 different experiments: in a realistic heart-thorax phantom, in a uniformity-resolution phantom, and in 14 healthy volunteers. METHODS: A nonuniform heart-thorax phantom was filled with 111 MBq of (82)Rb injected into the left ventricular (LV) wall. In the LV wall of the cardiac phantom, 3 inserts-1, 2, and 3 cm in diameter-were placed to simulate infarcts. A standard rest cardiac PET imaging protocol in 2D and 3D modes was used. Following the same protocol, a uniformity-resolution phantom with uniformly distributed activity of 1,998 MBq and 740 MBq of (82)Rb in water was used to obtain 2D PET images and 3D PET images, respectively. All 2D volunteer studies were performed by injecting 2,220 MBq of (82)Rb intravenously. For half the volunteers, 3D studies were performed with a high dose (HD) (2,220 MBq) of (82)Rb; for the remainder of the 3D studies, a low dose (LD) (740 MBq) of (82)Rb was used. In the 2D and LD 3D studies, there was a delay of 2 min and 3 min, respectively, followed by a 6-min acquisition. In the HD 3D volunteer studies, there was a delay of 5 min followed by a 6-min acquisition. Circumferential profiles of the short-axis slices and the contrast of the inserts were used to evaluate the cardiac phantom PET images. The transaxial slices from the uniformity-resolution phantom were evaluated by visual inspection and by measuring uniformity. The human studies were evaluated by measuring the contrast between LV wall and LV cavity, using linear profiles and visual analysis. RESULTS: In the cardiac phantom study, circumferential profiles for the 2D and 3D images were similar. The contrast values for the 1-, 2-, and 3-cm inserts in the 2D study were 0.19 +/- 0.03, 0.34 +/- 0.05, and 0.61 +/- 0.03, respectively. The respective contrast values in the 3D study were 0.15 +/- 0.02, 0.36 +/- 0.04, and 0.52 +/- 0.05. In the uniformity-resolution phantom study, the coefficients of variation, calculated for a representative uniform slice, were 5.3% and 7.6% for the 2D and 3D studies, respectively. For the 7 volunteers on whom HD 3D was used, the mean 2D contrast was 0.33 +/- 0.08 and the mean HD 3D contrast was 0.35 +/- 0.08 (P = not statistically significant). For the other 7 volunteers, on whom LD 3D was used, the mean 2D contrast was 0.39 +/- 0.06 and the mean LD 3D contrast was 0.39 +/- 0.10 (P = not statistically significant). In the tomographic slices, the 2D and 3D images and polar plots were similar. CONCLUSION: When obtained with a PET system having a high counting-rate performance, 2D and 3D (82)Rb PET cardiac images are comparable. LD 3D imaging can make (82)Rb PET cardiac imaging more affordable.     

Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H(2)(15)O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation.

The purpose of this study was to assess a 3-dimensional (3D)-only PET scanner (ECAT EXACT3D) for its use in the absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using H(2)(15)O. METHODS: Nine large white pigs were scanned with H(2)(15)O and C(15)O before and after partially occluding the circumflex (n = 4) or the left anterior descending (n = 5) coronary artery at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole. Radioactive microspheres labeled with either (57)Co or (46)Sc were injected during each of the H(2)(15)O scans, which allowed comparison between microsphere and PET measurements of regional MBF. PET analyses of 3D acquisition data were performed using filtered backprojection reconstruction and region-of-interest definition by factor and cluster analysis techniques and single-compartment model quantification. RESULTS: The Hanning filter applied in image reconstruction resulted in a left atrial blood volume recovery factor of 0.84 +/- 0.06. Differences between repeated measurements of recovery were small (mean, -0.8%; range, -6.6% to 3.6%). In 256 paired measurements of MBF ranging from 0.05 to 4.4 mL. g(- 1). min(-1), microsphere and PET measurements were fairly well correlated. The mean difference between the 2 methods was - 0.11 mL. g(-1). min(-1) and the limits of agreement (+2 SD) were -0.82 and 0.60 mL. g(-1). min(-1) (Bland-Altman plot). CONCLUSION: Dynamic measurements with H(2)(15)O using a 3D-only PET tomograph provide reliable and accurate measurements of absolute regional MBF over a wide flow range. The 3D acquisition technique can reduce the radiation dose to the subject while maintaining adequate counting statistics.     

Quantification of subendocardial and subepicardial blood flow using 15O-labeled water and PET: experimental validation.

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the relative coronary flow reserves (CFR) using (15)O-labeled water (H(2)(15)O) and 3-dimensional-only PET. METHODS: Eight pigs were scanned with H(2)(15)O and (15)O-labeled carbon monoxide (C(15)O) after partially occluding the circumflex (n = 3) or the left anterior descending (n = 5) coronary artery, both at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole. Radioactive microspheres were injected during each of the H(2)(15)O scans. RESULTS: In a total of 256 paired measurements of MBF, ranging from 0.30 to 4.46 mL.g(-1).min(-1), microsphere and PET MBF were fairly well correlated. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.01 +/- 0.52 mL.g(-1).min(-1) with 95% of the differences lying between the limits of agreement of -1.02 and 1.01 mL.g(-1).min(-1). CFR was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the ischemic subendocardium (PET = 1.12 +/- 0.45; microspheres = 1.09 +/- 0.50; P = 0.86) and subepicardium (PET = 1.2 +/- 0.35; microspheres = 1.32 +/- 0.5; P = 0.39) in comparison with remote subendocardium (PET = 1.7 +/- 0.62; microspheres = 1.64 +/- 0.61; P = 0.68) and subepicardium (PET = 1.79 +/- 0.73; microspheres = 2.19 +/- 0.86; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Dynamic measurements using H(2)(15)O and a 3-dimensional-only PET tomograph allow regional estimates of the transmural distribution of MBF over a wide flow range, although transmural flow differences were underestimated because of the partial-volume effect. PET subendocardial and subepicardial CFR were in good agreement with the microsphere values.     

Global myocardial blood flow and global flow reserve measurements by MRI and PET are comparable

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurements have been widely used in assessing the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis because they are more sensitive in predicting major cardiac events than angiographically detected reductions of coronary arteries. Myocardial blood flow can be determined by measuring coronary sinus (CS) flow with velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging (VEC-MRI). The purpose of this study was to compare global myocardial blood flow (MBF) and CFR measured using VEC-MRI with MBF and CFR measured using positron emission tomography (PET). We measured MBF at baseline and after dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in 12 male volunteers with VEC-MRI and PET. With VEC-MRI, MBF was 0.64 +/- 0.09 (ml/min/g) at baseline and 1.59 +/- 0.79 (ml/min/g) at hyperemia, which yielded an average CFR of 2.51 +/- 1.29. With PET, MBF was 0.65 +/- 0.20 (ml/min/g) at baseline and 1.78 +/- 0.72 (ml/min/g) at hyperemia, which yielded an average CFR of 2.79 +/- 0.97. The correlation of MBFs between these two methods was good (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The CFRs measured by MRI correlated well with those measured using PET (r = 0.76, P < 0.004). These results suggest that MRI is a useful and accurate method to measure global MBF and CFR. Therefore, it would be suitable for studying risk factor modifications of vascular function at an early stage in healthy volunteers.     

CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion quantification using a PET/CT hybrid scanner.

In routine PET, a 10- to 20-min transmission scan with a rotating (68)Ge source is commonly obtained for attenuation correction (AC). AC is time-consuming using this procedure and could considerably be shortened by instead using a rapid CT scan. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of CT AC in quantitative myocardial perfusion PET using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. METHODS: (13)N-labeled NH(3) and PET were used to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF) (mL/min/g) at rest and during standard adenosine stress. In group 1 (n = 7), CT scans (0.5 s) of the heart area with different tube currents (10, 40, 80, and 120 mA) were compared with a standard (68)Ge transmission (20 min) and with no AC. In group 2 (n = 3), the repeatability of 8 consecutive CT scans at a tube current of 10 mA was assessed. In group 3 (n = 4), emission was preceded and followed by 3 CT scans (10 mA) and 1 (68)Ge scan for each patient. For reconstruction, filtered backprojection (FBP) was compared with iterative reconstruction (IT). RESULTS: For group 1, no significant difference in mean MBF for resting and hyperemic scans was found when emission reconstructed with (68)Ge AC was compared with emission reconstructed with CT AC at any of the different tube currents. Only emission without any correction differed significantly from (68)Ge AC. For group 2, repeated measurements revealed a coefficient of variance ranging from 2% to 5% and from 2% to 6% at rest and at stress, respectively. For group 3, similar reproducibility coefficients (RC) for MBF were obtained when (68)Ge AC(FBP) was compared with (68)Ge AC(IT) (RC = 0.218) and when CT AC(FBP) was compared with CT AC(IT) (RC = 0.227). Even better reproducibility (lower RC) was found when (68)Ge AC(FBP) was compared with CT AC(FBP) (RC = 0.130) and when (68)Ge AC(IT) was compared with CT AC(IT) (RC = 0.146). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative MBF with a hybrid PET/CT scanner, the use of CT AC (with a tube current of 10 mA) instead of (68)Ge AC provides accurate results.     

Effects of iterative reconstruction on image contrast and lesion detection in gamma camera coincidence imaging in lung and breast cancers.

To investigate the effects of iterative reconstruction in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) gamma camera coincidence imaging (GCI), image contrast and visual detection obtained by using the iterative ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction, in a phantom and in patients with lung cancer and breast cancer, were compared with those obtained by using the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction. Images of a cylindrical phantom containing hot spheres of various sizes (10-38 mm) were acquired by positron emission tomography (PET) and GCI at various sphere-to-background activity ratios. Forty-one consecutive patients with biopsy-proven cancer of lung (n = 20) and breast (n = 21) underwent PET and GCI on the same day after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of FDG. GCI images reconstructed by the OSEM and the FBP were compared. FDG PET was considered as the standard of reference. In GCI phantom images, OSEM yielded better contrast and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than FBP over the range of sphere sizes. Attenuation correction improved both the image measures and sphere detection obtained by the OSEM in GCI. In the study involving patients, FDG PET depicted 41 primary tumours and 25 metastatic lymph nodes. All of the tumours >2 cm in diameter (n = 25), six of the nine tumours 1.5-2.0 cm in diameter (67%), two of seven tumours <1.5 cm in diameter (29%), and 20 metastatic lymph nodes (80%) were detected in attenuation uncorrected GCI reconstructed by the OSEM as well as the FBP. The undetected lesions in GCI were identical between the OSEM and the FBP reconstructions. OSEM yielded significantly greater tumour-to-background (T/B) ratios and lower noise than FBP in GCI (T/B ratios, 4.1+/-3.2 vs 3.7+/-2.7, P = 0.02; noise, 0.09+/-0.04 vs 0.14+/-0.05, P<0.0001). In conclusion, OSEM yielded better image contrast and less noise than the FBP in GCI, but the lesion detection obtained by the OSEM and the FBP in attenuation uncorrected GCI in patients with lung cancer and breast cancer were similar. Phantom data suggest the potential of OSEM for improving lesion detection in GCI after attenuation correction.     

Iterative reconstruction based on median root prior in quantification of myocardial blood flow and oxygen metabolism.

The aim of this study was to compare reproducibility and accuracy of two reconstruction methods in quantification of myocardial blood flow and oxygen metabolism with 15O-labeled tracers and PET. A new iterative Bayesian reconstruction method based on median root prior (MRP) was compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction method, which is traditionally used for image reconstruction in PET studies. METHODS: Regional myocardial blood flow (rMBF), oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) and myocardial metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (rMMRO2) were quantified from images reconstructed in 27 subjects using both MRP and FBP methods. For each subject, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the lateral, anterior and septal regions on four planes. To test reproducibility, the ROI drawing procedure was repeated. By using two sets of ROIs, variability was evaluated from images reconstructed with the MRP and the FBP methods. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients of mean values of rMBF, rOEF and rMMRO2 were significantly higher in the images reconstructed with the MRP reconstruction method compared with the images reconstructed with the FBP method (rMBF: MRP r = 0.896 versus FBP r = 0.737, P < 0.001; rOEF: 0.915 versus 0.855, P < 0.001; rMMRO2: 0.954 versus 0.885, P < 0.001). Coefficient of variation for each parameter was significantly lower in MRP images than in FBP images (rMBF: MRP 23.5% +/- 11.3% versus FBP 30.1% +/- 14.7%, P < 0.001; rOEF: 21.0% +/- 11.1% versus 32.1% +/- 19.8%, P < 0.001; rMMRO2: 23.1% +/- 13.2% versus 30.3% +/- 19.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The MRP reconstruction method provides higher reproducibility and lower variability in the quantitative myocardial parameters when compared with the FBP method. This study shows that the new MRP reconstruction method improves accuracy and stability of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow and oxygen metabolism with 15O and PET.     

Validation of myocardial blood flow estimation with nitrogen-13 ammonia PET by the argon inert gas technique in humans

We simultaneously determined global myocardial blood flow (MBF) by the argon inert gas technique and by nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) to validate PET-derived MBF values in humans. A total of 19 patients were investigated at rest (n = 19) and during adenosine-induced hyperaemia (n = 16). Regional coronary artery stenoses were ruled out by angiography. The argon inert gas method uses the difference of arterial and coronary sinus argon concentrations during inhalation of a mixture of 75% argon and 25% oxygen to estimate global MBF. It can be considered as valid as the microspheres technique, which, however, cannot be applied in humans. Dynamic PET was performed after injection of 0.8 +/- 0.2 GBq 13N-ammonia and MBF was calculated applying a two-tissue compartment model. MBF values derived from the argon method at rest and during the hyperaemic state were 1.03 +/- 0.24 ml min-1 g-1 and 2.64 +/- 1.02 ml min-1 g-1, respectively. MBF values derived from ammonia PET at rest and during hyperaemia were 0.95 +/- 0.23 ml min-1 g-1 and 2.44 +/- 0.81 ml min-1 g-1, respectively. The correlation between the two methods was close (y = 0.92x + 0.14, r = 0.96; P < 0.0001). No indication was found for limited extraction of ammonia in the myocardium. The high concordance of global MBF values derived with argon and ammonia indicates that the implicit correction of spillover and recovery effects, incorporated in the model by including an effective blood volume parameter, works correctly quantitatively. Our data provide the previously missing human validation of MBF measurements from 13N-ammonia PET.     

PET-measured responses of MBF to cold pressor testing correlate with indices of coronary vasomotion on quantitative coronary angiography.

The aims of this study were to determine whether responses in myocardial blood flow (MBF) to the cold pressor testing (CPT) method noninvasively with PET correlate with an established and validated index of flow-dependent coronary vasomotion on quantitative angiography. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (57 +/- 6 y; 16 with hypertension, 10 with hypercholesterolemia, 8 smokers, and 22 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms were studied. Biplanar end-diastolic images of a selected proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (n = 27) or left circumflex artery (LCx) (n = 29) were evaluated with quantitative coronary angiography in order to determine the CPT-induced changes of epicardial luminal area (LA, mm(2)). Within 20 d of coronary angiography, MBF in the LAD, LCx, and right coronary artery territory was measured with (13)N-ammonia and PET at baseline and during CPT. RESULTS: CPT induced on both study days comparable percent changes in the rate x pressure product (%DeltaRPP, 37% +/- 13% and 40% +/- 17%; P = not significant [NS]). For the entire study group, the epicardial LA decreased from 5.07 +/- 1.02 to 4.88 +/- 1.04 mm(2) (DeltaLA, -0.20 +/- 0.89 mm(2)) or by -2.19% +/- 17%, while MBF in the corresponding epicardial vessel segment increased from 0.76 +/- 0.16 to 1.03 +/- 0.33 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) (DeltaMBF, 0.27 +/- 0.25 mL x min(-1) x g(-1)) or 36% +/- 31% (P 相似文献   

Improving 3D PET imaging by restoration: a phantom study.

The main objective of our work is to improve 3D PET imaging. Compared with 2D PET, 3D PET imaging has slightly worse axial resolution and a significantly higher contribution of scatter and randoms, but 3D PET has much better sensitivity than 2D PET imaging. A Jaszczak deluxe phantom was acquired in 3D mode on our GE Advance PET system. Activity of 333 MBq of 18F was uniformly distributed. Prior to the emission scan, blank and transmission scans had been acquired. They were used for attenuation correction. The duration of the emission scan was 20 min, transmission 10 min, and blank 20 min. Standard FBP reconstruction software provided by the vendor was used to obtain slice images. Point spread function was also acquired in a 21 cm diameter cylinder phantom filled with water 6.0 cm from the center and used to create restoration filters. Two restoration filters were applied, medium and sharp. Results showed significant improvement in resolution, contrast and detectability of the cold rods. The artifacts outside the phantom were also significantly reduced. For 11.1 mm rods, average contrast was 0.49+/-0.02 in the original image, 0.52+/-0.04 in the medium restored image, and in the sharply restored image 0.75+/-0.05. For 7.9 mm rods, average contrast was 0.07+/-0.01 in the original image, 0.21+/-0.03 in the medium restored image, and 0.50+/-0.04 in the sharply restored image. The amount of noise in the uniform slices, measured as the coefficient of variation (COV), was 5.5, 7.1 and 10.8% in the original image and in the images restored with medium and sharp filters, respectively. In conclusion, restoration can significantly improve the resolution and contrast of 3D PET imaging.     

Validation of myocardial perfusion reserve measurements using regularized factor images of H(2)(15)O dynamic PET scans.

The use of H(2)(15)O PET scans for the measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) has been validated in both animal models and humans. Nevertheless, this protocol requires cumbersome acquisitions such as C(15)O inhalation or (18)F-FDG injection to obtain images suitable for determining myocardial regions of interest. Regularized factor analysis is an alternative method proposed to define myocardial contours directly from H(2)(15)O studies without any C(15)O or FDG scan. The study validates this method by comparing the MPR obtained by the regularized factor analysis with the coronary flow reserve (CFR) obtained by intracoronary Doppler as well as with the MPR obtained by an FDG acquisition. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients with ischemic cardiopathy or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy were investigated. The CFR of patients was measured sonographically using a Doppler catheter tip placed into the proximal left anterior descending artery. The mean velocity was recorded at baseline and after dipyridamole administration. All subjects underwent PET imaging, including 2 H(2)(15)O myocardial perfusion studies at baseline and after dipyridamole infusion, followed by an FDG acquisition. Dynamic H(2)(15)O scans were processed by regularized factor analysis. Left ventricular cavity and anteroseptal myocardial regions of interest were drawn independently on regularized factor images and on FDG images. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MPR were estimated by fitting the H(2)(15)O time-activity curves with a compartmental model. RESULTS: In patients, no significant difference was observed among the 3 methods of measurement-Doppler CFR, 1.73 +/- 0.57; regularized factor analysis MPR, 1.71 +/- 0.68; FDG MPR, 1.83 +/- 0.49-using a Friedman 2-way ANOVA by ranks. MPR measured with the regularized factor images correlated significantly with CFR (y = 1.17x - 0.30; r = 0.97). In the global population, the regularized factor analysis MPR and FDG MPR correlated strongly (y = 0.99x; r = 0.93). Interoperator repeatability on regularized factor images was 0.126 mL/min/g for rest MBF, 0.38 mL/min/g for stress MBF, and 0.34 for MPR (19% of mean MPR). CONCLUSION: Regularized factor analysis provides well-defined myocardial images from H(2)(15)O dynamic scans, permitting an accurate and simple measurement of MPR. The method reduces exposure to radiation and examination time and lowers the cost of MPR protocols using a PET scanner.     

Effects of left bundle branch block on myocardial FDG PET in patients without significant coronary artery stenoses.

Cardiac PET studies in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) are few, and the results are conflicting. In particular, even if a reduced uptake of FDG is reported, confirmation in a large group of patients and exact understanding of the underlying cause are lacking. METHODS: We selected 29 consecutive patients who had complete LBBB and no significant stenosis on coronary angiography scheduled for FDG and 13N-NH3 PET for myocardial viability evaluation at our center. Wall motion was evaluated using 2-dimensional echocardiography. Ten volunteers without coronary stenosis or LBBB served as a control group. RESULTS: All LBBB patients had a reverse mismatch in the septum, defined as reduced uptake of FDG in comparison with 13N-NH3. The mismatch extended to the anterior and inferior walls in 17 patients. The mean (+/-SD) septal-to-lateral ratio was 0.57 +/- 0.11 for FDG (range, 0.28-0.76) and 0.99 +/- 0.12 for 13N-NH3 (range, 0.75-1.18), with P < 0.0001. In contrast, no significant differences in uptake were seen in the control group, which had a septal-to-lateral ratio of 0.95 +/- 0.13 for FDG (range, 0.78-1.15; P < 0.01 with respect to LBBB patients) and 0.94 +/- 0.11 (range, 0.85-1.20) for 13N-NH3. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that in LBBB patients without significant coronary stenosis, FDG uptake in the septum changes without a correlating change in perfusion. To avoid possible overestimation of necrosis, especially in the LAD territory, this phenomenon must be considered in evaluations of myocardial viability using FDG images.     

Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress.

PET allows absolute measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and repeatability of supine bicycle exercise stress, compared with standard adenosine stress, in PET. METHODS: In 11 healthy volunteers, MBF was assessed at rest, during adenosine-induced (140 microg/kg/min over 7 min) hyperemia, and immediately after supine bicycle exercise (mean workload, 130 W, which is 70% of the predicted value) using PET and (15)O-H(2)O. The assessment was then repeated after 20 min. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as hyperemic/resting MBF for adenosine stress and exercise stress. Repeatability was evaluated according to the method of Bland and Altman. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the paired resting MBF (1.22 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.26 +/- 0.21 mL/min/g; mean difference, 3% +/- 11%) and the hyperemic MBF with adenosine stress (5.13 +/- 0.74 vs. 4.97 +/- 1.05; mean difference, -4% +/- 14%) or exercise stress (2.35 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.61; mean difference, -4% +/- 19%). CFR was reproducible with adenosine stress (4.23 +/- 0.62 vs. 4.05 +/- 1.06, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, -5% +/- 19%) and exercise stress (1.91 +/- 0.46 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.44, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, -5% +/- 15%). Repeatability coefficients for MBF were 0.26 (rest), 1.34 (adenosine stress), and 0.82 (exercise stress) mL/min/g. CONCLUSION: Assessment of CFR with (15)O-H(2)O and PET using bicycle exercise in the PET scanner is feasible and at least as repeatable as using adenosine stress.     

Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions of (18)F-FDG PET.

BACKGROUND: Recently, iterative reconstruction with segmented attenuation corrections (IRSAC) has been introduced for reconstruction of (18)F-FDG PET images. IRSAC produces images that are more pleasing to the eye, but qualitative and quantitative comparisons between IRSAC and filtered back projection (FBP) have not been reported for metastatic cancer. Since quantitative data has been widely used as an adjunct to interpretation of PET scans, comparison between IRSAC and FBP is needed. The purpose of this study was to compare image quality and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) obtained with FBP and with IRSAC in metastatic lesions from prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty (18)F-FDG PET scans (10 baseline and 10 follow-up) were performed in 10 patients with prostate cancer (ages 66-85 yrs, mean 73.6 yrs). Acquisition began 45 min after injection of 370 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Images were reconstructed using FBP and IRSAC, and submitted to visual and quantitative analysis. SUVmax was obtained for all metastases, on FBP and IRSAC. A Jaszczak phantom study was also performed. RESULTS: IRSAC images showed better image quality than FBP especially in regions of high activity concentrations. IRSAC detected 106 lesions on both baseline and follow-up scans, while FBP detected 100 and 95 lesions on baseline and follow-up scans, respectively. Therefore, 17 more lesions were seen on IRSAC. The mean SUVmax values on baseline scans for FBP and IRSAC were systematically different, at 4.46+/-1.99 and 5.13+/-2.67, respectively. On follow-up scans values were 3.89+/-1.72 for FBP and 4.29+/-1.93 for IRSAC. Comparison of FBP with IRSAC on baseline and follow-up scans were statistically significant (baseline: paired "t"-test p=0.0017; follow-up: paired "t"-test p=0.0008). Phantom studies reveal that these differences can be explained by the type of reconstruction filters used, and IRSAC was more accurate than FBP. CONCLUSIONS: IRSAC detects smaller volumes in phantoms, patient images are easier to interpret and more metastatic lesions were detected. In addition, IRSAC provides reproducible quantitative data, comparable to data provided by FBP. IRSAC SUV and FBP SUV are in close agreement but there was a statistically significant difference between the two, and therefore threshold values of SUV will probably need to be re-determined with IRSAC, and are likely to be 10 to 19% higher than currently reported.