Is a Single Blood Eosinophil Count a Reliable Marker for “Eosinophilic Asthma?”

Purpose. In the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, the expert panel recommends that a written asthma action plan be provided for all patients with asthma. Studies evaluating the usefulness of the asthma action plan in children are limited. We aim to determine exacerbation frequency and usefulness of the asthma action plan in managing exacerbations that occur in a pediatric primary care setting. Methods. Caretakers of asthmatic children attending the general pediatric clinic in an inner‐city hospital completed a one‐page questionnaire covering topics such as asthma severity, frequency of exacerbations, and possession/usefulness of an asthma action plan. Although controversy exists over the definition of yellow and red zone exacerbations, we defined the yellow zone as symptoms that require albuterol more than three times a day or more than two nights in succession. The red zone was defined as symptoms requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or an urgent physician visit. Results. Seventy of 75 subjects completed the survey. Almost 80% of respondents carried the diagnosis of persistent asthma, whereas the remainder had intermittent asthma. Exacerbation frequency over a 3‐month period was determined. Approximately 80% of children experienced at least one yellow zone episode: 42% had one or two yellow zone episodes, and 39.6% had between three and five episodes. Sixty‐three percent of patients did not experience a single red zone exacerbation. Almost 75% (44 of 59) of subjects possessed an asthma action plan. Ninety percent (37 of 41) of respondents with action plans found the plan to be useful in managing exacerbations. Conclusion. Approximately four of every five asthmatic children seen in this primary care setting experienced a yellow zone exacerbation at least once during a 3‐month period. One third experienced at least one red zone episode. Nine of every 10 caretakers with an action plan reported the asthma action plan to be of value in managing exacerbations.     

How Frequent Are Asthma Exacerbations in a Pediatric Primary Care Setting and Do Written Asthma Action Plans Help in Their Management?

Purpose. In the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, the expert panel recommends that a written asthma action plan be provided for all patients with asthma. Studies evaluating the usefulness of the asthma action plan in children are limited. We aim to determine exacerbation frequency and usefulness of the asthma action plan in managing exacerbations that occur in a pediatric primary care setting. Methods. Caretakers of asthmatic children attending the general pediatric clinic in an inner-city hospital completed a one-page questionnaire covering topics such as asthma severity, frequency of exacerbations, and possession/usefulness of an asthma action plan. Although controversy exists over the definition of yellow and red zone exacerbations, we defined the yellow zone as symptoms that require albuterol more than three times a day or more than two nights in succession. The red zone was defined as symptoms requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or an urgent physician visit. Results. Seventy of 75 subjects completed the survey. Almost 80% of respondents carried the diagnosis of persistent asthma, whereas the remainder had intermittent asthma. Exacerbation frequency over a 3-month period was determined. Approximately 80% of children experienced at least one yellow zone episode: 42% had one or two yellow zone episodes, and 39.6% had between three and five episodes. Sixty-three percent of patients did not experience a single red zone exacerbation. Almost 75% (44 of 59) of subjects possessed an asthma action plan. Ninety percent (37 of 41) of respondents with action plans found the plan to be useful in managing exacerbations. Conclusion. Approximately four of every five asthmatic children seen in this primary care setting experienced a yellow zone exacerbation at least once during a 3-month period. One third experienced at least one red zone episode. Nine of every 10 caretakers with an action plan reported the asthma action plan to be of value in managing exacerbations.     

Do asthma patients in general practice profit from a structured allergy evaluation and skin testing? A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Although allergy is central to the pathophysiology of asthma, little is known about the benefits of a structured approach to allergen diagnosis and management in primary care asthma patients. OBJECTIVES: We studied effects of a structured allergen evaluation and allergen avoidance advice combined with or without additional allergy skin testing on health status, illness perception, and lung function of asthma patients treated in general practice. METHOD: Fifty-four asthma patients were randomly assigned to three groups: (i) Standard asthma care with information on the stepwise treatment approach, a written action plan, and inhaler technique training; (ii) Additional structured allergen evaluation and avoidance advice; (iii) Additional structured allergen evaluation and avoidance advice based on skin prick test results. Patients were seen for one initial appointment at a primary care asthma clinic and a follow-up examination 3 months later. On both occasions, questionnaire measures of symptoms, illness perception, and the perceived control of asthma were administered. Lung function was measured by spirometry (PEF, FEV1). Perceived allergic asthma triggers, the trigger impact, and the trigger control were assessed in both intervention groups. Results: Following intervention, a decrease in beta-adrenergic inhaler use, an increase in the perceived control of asthma, and a decrease in the bothering from asthma symptoms were observed for all three groups. Intervention groups showed a higher awareness of animal-allergic triggers, and the perceived control of asthma triggers was increased in the group receiving no skin tests. FEV1 showed an improvement in both intervention groups. CONCLUSION: Structured allergy evaluation and avoidance advice can improve lung function and the control of asthma in primary care. Further research is needed on the additional benefits of allergy skin testing.     

The Impact of Exacerbations on the Asthmatic Patient's Preference Scores

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of exacerbations on mild to moderate asthmatic patients' preference-based, health-related, quality of life scores and also to describe the effect of these exacerbations on daily life. In a survey, 100 mild to moderate asthmatic patients in the United Kingdom were asked to rate three different health marker states on a scale between 0 (death) and 100 (perfect health), defined as: your asthma of today, a mild exacerbation, and a severe exacerbation of asthma. They were also asked to describe their symptoms and what they did when experiencing an exacerbation. During exacerbations the vast majority of asthmatic patients have significant symptoms and consume a considerable amount of health care resources, which often overlap. The health marker state “your asthma of today” was given a mean score of 81.0, a mild exacerbation a score of 62.1, and a severe exacerbation a score of 25.6, indicating a large impact on patients' daily life and their health-related quality of life. In conclusion, asthmatic patients are severely affected in their health and daily living by mild and severe exacerbations. Considerable effort should be made to reduce the number and severity of exacerbations.     

The Impact of Exacerbations on the Asthmatic Patient's Preference Scores

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of exacerbations on mild to moderate asthmatic patients' preference-based, health-related, quality of life scores and also to describe the effect of these exacerbations on daily life. In a survey, 100 mild to moderate asthmatic patients in the United Kingdom were asked to rate three different health marker states on a scale between 0 (death) and 100 (perfect health), defined as: your asthma of today, a mild exacerbation, and a severe exacerbation of asthma. They were also asked to describe their symptoms and what they did when experiencing an exacerbation. During exacerbations the vast majority of asthmatic patients have significant symptoms and consume a considerable amount of health care resources, which often overlap. The health marker state “your asthma of today” was given a mean score of 81.0, a mild exacerbation a score of 62.1, and a severe exacerbation a score of 25.6, indicating a large impact on patients' daily life and their health-related quality of life. In conclusion, asthmatic patients are severely affected in their health and daily living by mild and severe exacerbations. Considerable effort should be made to reduce the number and severity of exacerbations.     

Evaluation of two different educational interventions for adult patients consulting with an acute asthma exacerbation

Asthma education decreases the number of emergency visits in specific subgroups of patients with asthma. However, it remains unknown whether this improvement is related only to the use of an action plan alone or to other components of the educational intervention. A total of 126 patients consulting urgently for an acute asthma exacerbation were recruited; 98 completed the study. The first 45 patients were assigned to Group C (control; usual treatment). Thereafter, patients were randomized to either Group LE (limited education; teaching of the inhaler technique plus self- action plan given by the on call physician) or Group SE (same as group LE plus a structured educational program emphasizing self-capacity to manage asthma exacerbations). At baseline, there was no difference between groups in asthma morbidity, medication needs, or pulmonary function. After 12 mo, only Group SE showed a significant improvement in knowledge, willingness to adjust medications, quality of life scores, and peak expiratory flows. In the last 6 mo, the number of unscheduled medical visits for asthma was significantly lower in Group SE in comparison with groups C and LE (p = 0.03). The number (%) of patients with unscheduled medical visits also decreased significantly in Group SE compared with Groups C and LE (p = 0.02). We conclude that a structured educational intervention emphasizing self-management improves patient outcomes significantly more than a limited intervention or conventional treatment.     

Triggers in adult asthma: are patients aware of triggers and doing right?

BackgroundAs triggers have a potential to induce asthma exacerbations, awareness of the patients to individual triggers as well as protective measures might be helpful to prevent asthma attacks. Though allergens and allergen avoidance have been studied extensively, there are only few studies on non-allergic triggers and their avoidance for adult patients with asthma. In this study, we wanted to investigate asthma triggers and compliance to the preventive measures in an adult population.MethodsOne hundred and thirty one adult asthma patients were enrolled into the study. A face to face interview was done by using a questionnaire including individual asthma triggers, prevention measures against major modifiable triggers and knowledge sources of the cases.ResultsRegardless of asthma severity, 59.5 % of the subjects reported to be triggered by more than 10 factors. The most common triggers were air pollutants (89.3 %) and weather changes (81.7 %). Severe group was more frequently affected by medications, emotional stress, weather changes and indoor pollutants than other severity groups (p = 0.017, 0.014, 0.049 and 0.018, respectively) whereas stress was reported more frequently by females than males. Prevention measures were insufficient regarding some major triggers.ConclusionAdult patients are vulnerable to several triggers regardless from underlying severity of the illness. Insufficient compliance to the major preventive measures indicates that new strategies are needed to prevent asthma attacks caused by modifiable triggers.     

Trends in asthma self-management skills and inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy and postpartum from 2004 to 2017

Objective: Asthma exacerbations and medication non-adherence are significant clinical problems during pregnancy. While asthma self-management education is effective, the number of education sessions required to maximise asthma management knowledge and inhaler technique and whether improvements persist postpartum, are unknown. This paper describes how asthma knowledge, skills, and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use have changed over time. Methods: Data were obtained from 3 cohorts of pregnant women with asthma recruited in Newcastle, Australia between 2004 and 2017 (N = 895). Medication use, adherence, knowledge, and inhaler technique were compared between cohorts. Changes in self-management knowledge/skills and women's perception of medication risk to the fetus were assessed in 685 women with 5 assessments during pregnancy, and 95 women who had a postpartum assessment. Results: At study entry, 41%, 29%, and 38% of participants used ICS in the 2004, 2007, and 2013 cohorts, respectively (p = 0.017), with 40% non-adherence in each cohort. Self-management skills of pregnant women with asthma did not improve between 2004 and 2017 and possession of a written action plan remained low. Maximum improvements were reached by 3 sessions for medications knowledge and one session for inhaler technique, and were maintained postpartum. ICS adherence was maximally improved after one session, but not maintained postpartum. Perceived risk of asthma medications on the fetus was highest for corticosteroid-containing medication; and was significantly reduced following education. Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of non-adherence and poor self-management skills in all cohorts. More awareness of the importance of optimal asthma management during pregnancy is warranted, since no improvements were observed over the past decade.     

Patient Education Provided to Asthmatic Children: A Historical Cohort Study of the Implementation of NIH Recommendations

NIH guidelines for treatment of childhood asthma emphasize educating both patients and family about avoiding triggers and providing information to support self-management of asthma. To determine the extent to which primary care providers had implemented these recommendations, we examined the patient education provided to a cohort of asthmatic children (n = 331) between January and December 1994.

During 1994 education of any type was documented for less than half the children. Provision of education was associated with asthma severity: An action plan for exacerbations was discussed with the majority with moderate or severe asthma (61%). Avoiding triggers (aOR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.37-4.12) and treatment goals (aOR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.46-6.75), were more likely to be discussed with children who were prescribed inhaled anti-inflammatory medication, after adjustment for asthma severity and age.

Limited implementation of the NIH recommendations by primary care providers in our study may have reduced their impact on the management of childhood asthma.     

Sudden-onset asthma exacerbations: clinical features, response to therapy, and 2-week follow-up. Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC) investigators.

Sudden-onset asthma exacerbations may have different triggers and responses to treatment than slower-onset exacerbations. The authors studied this hypothesis among patients with severe asthma exacerbations. The Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration prospectively enrolled patients presenting to 64 North American emergency departments with asthma exacerbations. Of 1,847 patients aged 18-54 yrs, 900 had severe exacerbations (peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) <50% predicted or hospitalized without PEFR). These patients were divided into sudden-onset (< or =3 h of symptoms) and slower-onset (>3 h of symptoms) groups. Fourteen per cent (95% confidence interval, 11-16%) of patients with severe asthma exacerbations had sudden-onset exacerbations. Sudden-onset patients were similar to slower-onset patients, except triggers of their exacerbations were more often respiratory allergens, exercise or psychosocial stress and less often respiratory infections. Sudden-onset patients were more likely to have used oral beta-agonists and salmeterol in the preceding 4 weeks. Although initial PEFRs and management were similar, sudden-onset patients had a greater improvement in PEFR (35 versus 28% p<0.001). Sudden-onset patients were less often discharged on systemic corticosteroids, but had similar 2-week relapse rates compared with slower-onset patients. Among patients presenting with severe asthma exacerbations, sudden-onset exacerbations had a different pattern of triggers and greater improvement with treatment than slower-onset exacerbations.     

A Comparison of Patient Attitudes Toward Asthma Self-Management Among Acute and Preventive Care Settings

This study characterizes the attitudes regarding asthma and asthma care of low-income, African-American adults who receive care from acute care settings. As a point of reference, their attitudes and knowledge were compared with those of a group of patients receiving asthma care from a private setting that stresses preventive asthma self-management. Patients were assessed regarding attitudes toward (1) routine asthma self-care and decisions as to when to self-treat versus seek asthma care, (2) administration of asthma medications, (3) satisfaction with acute-care services, and (4) the desire for asthma education. Asthma morbidity, sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of environmental triggers, and daily stressors were also assessed. Responses of adults receiving most of their asthma care from acute care settings suggest the same pattern of failure to treat asthma regularly and delay in seeking care as implicated in asthma deaths among children. Emphasis on self-treatment of asthma symptoms, not preventive selfmanagement, was apparent among the attitudes of the acute care patients. Lack of regular care, delay of treatment, and reliance on self-treatment via over-the-counter medications was noted. Implications of these findings for the development of asthma education programs are addressed.     

Correspondence: Re: Experimental Design to Study Sustained-Release Theophylline Preparations Sincerely,Miles Weinberger,M.D., Professor of Pediatrics,Chairman, Pediatric Allergy,and Pulmonary Division,The University of Iowa Iowa City,Iowa 52242

This study characterizes the attitudes regarding asthma and asthma care of low-income, African-American adults who receive care from acute care settings. As a point of reference, their attitudes and knowledge were compared with those of a group of patients receiving asthma care from a private setting that stresses preventive asthma self-management. Patients were assessed regarding attitudes toward (1) routine asthma self-care and decisions as to when to self-treat versus seek asthma care, (2) administration of asthma medications, (3) satisfaction with acute-care services, and (4) the desire for asthma education. Asthma morbidity, sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of environmental triggers, and daily stressors were also assessed. Responses of adults receiving most of their asthma care from acute care settings suggest the same pattern of failure to treat asthma regularly and delay in seeking care as implicated in asthma deaths among children. Emphasis on self-treatment of asthma symptoms, not preventive selfmanagement, was apparent among the attitudes of the acute care patients. Lack of regular care, delay of treatment, and reliance on self-treatment via over-the-counter medications was noted. Implications of these findings for the development of asthma education programs are addressed.     

Management of the Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

All patients with asthma are at risk of having asthma exacerbations characterized by worsening symptoms, airflow obstruction, and an increased requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The goals of managing an asthma exacerbation are prompt recognition and rapid reversal of airflow obstruction to avert relapses and future episodes. Short-acting beta-agonists, oxygen, and corticosteroids form the basis of management of acute asthma exacerbation, but a role is emerging for anticholinergics and newer agents such as levalbuterol and formoterol. Initiation or intensification of long-term controller therapy, treatment of comorbid conditions, avoidance of likely triggers, and timely follow-up care prevent setbacks. Acceptance of current treatment guidelines by physicians and adherence to the recommended clinical regimens by patients are essential for effective management of asthma. The physician should strive to establish a constructive relationship with the patient by addressing the patient's concerns, reaching agreement on the goals of therapy, and developing a written action plan for patient self-management.     

Strategies for the management of asthma

Abstract The aims of treating patients with asthma are to relieve symptoms, to prevent symptoms and exacerbations, and to prevent long-term deterioration in lung function. It is the role of medical practitioners to inform the patient what asthma is, and to develop a plan to achieve the aims for the individual, recognizing that asthma is frequently a chronic, lifelong disease. Most patients can be diagnosed, assessed for severity and causes, and treated in primary care practices, however sometimes help from an asthma clinic or a specialist is required. The most important management decision is to determine whether the patient needs inhaled corticosteroids; subsequently, decisions about dose, duration and method of delivery of treatment can be tailored to the individual depending on the preferences and social conditions of the patient. The aim of this article is to present the latest strategies for the management of asthma and the simplest methods for their implementation. Important new strategies include careful assessment of the severity; the immediate introduction of a plan that is tailored for the individual and aimed at the possible reversing of the disease; detailed instructions for management of exacerbations and the combined use of inhaled corticosteroids with a long-acting bronchodilator. It is becoming clear that these strategies obviate dependence on oral corticosteroids in newly diagnosed asthmatic patients. Furthermore, relatively low doses of inhaled corticosteroids can be used to maintain good control if used in conjunction with other therapies. The role of newly developed antagonists to leukotrienes is not yet known but it may well be useful in mild asthma and in special forms of the disease, such as those sensitive to aspirin. In the future, the most important strategy will be to prevent the disease.     

Asthma self-management skills and the use of asthma education during pregnancy.

During pregnancy, patients with asthma are at risk of poor outcomes, particularly when asthma is poorly controlled. The aim of this study was to determine the level of asthma self-management skills and knowledge among pregnant subjects and describe the implementation of an asthma education programme delivered in an antenatal clinic setting. Pregnant subjects with asthma were assessed by an asthma educator at 20 (n = 211) and 33 weeks gestation (n = 149). Lung function, symptoms, medication use, adherence, knowledge and inhaler technique were assessed. They were asked whether they had a written asthma action plan, or performed peak flow monitoring. Asthma was classified as mild, moderate or severe. At the first visit with the asthma educator, 40% of females reported nonadherence to inhaled corticosteroids, inhaler technique was assessed as inadequate in 16% and 42% had inadequate medication knowledge. Peak flow monitoring was performed by 3% and 15% had a written action plan. There were significant improvements in all aspects of asthma self-management following education. In females with severe asthma, night symptoms and reliever medication use significantly decreased after education. In conclusion, during pregnancy, patients with asthma have poor asthma knowledge and skills, and may benefit from self-management education as part of their obstetric care.     

Managing outpatient asthma exacerbations

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that renders individuals prone to acute exacerbations. Several allergic and nonallergic triggers can incite an asthma exacerbation. The goals of managing an asthma exacerbation are prompt recognition, rapid reversal of airflow obstruction, prevention of relapses, and forestalling future episodes. A written asthma home-management plan is essential to minimize the severity of exacerbations. Short-acting β-agonists, oxygen, and corticosteroids are fundamental to early intervention in acute asthma exacerbation. Anticholinergics and magnesium sulfate can help nonresponders. Newer agents such as levalbuterol and long-acting β-agonists might be future additions to our armamentarium of drugs to treat acute exacerbations. Initiation or intensification of long-term controller therapy, treatment of co-morbid conditions, and avoidance of possible triggers along with prompt follow-up can help prevent relapses. Listening to patient preferences and concerns to enhance adherence and regular follow-up care can help prevent future episodes.     

Management of the Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

All patients with asthma are at risk of having asthma exacerbations characterized by worsening symptoms, airflow obstruction, and an increased requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The goals of managing an asthma exacerbation are prompt recognition and rapid reversal of airflow obstruction to avert relapses and future episodes. Short-acting beta-agonists, oxygen, and corticosteroids form the basis of management of acute asthma exacerbation, but a role is emerging for anticholinergics and newer agents such as levalbuterol and formoterol. Initiation or intensification of long-term controller therapy, treatment of comorbid conditions, avoidance of likely triggers, and timely follow-up care prevent setbacks. Acceptance of current treatment guidelines by physicians and adherence to the recommended clinical regimens by patients are essential for effective management of asthma. The physician should strive to establish a constructive relationship with the patient by addressing the patient's concerns, reaching agreement on the goals of therapy, and developing a written action plan for patient self-management.     

Comprehensive Asthma Management: Guidelines for Clinicians

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by reversible airway obstruction and nonspecific airway hyperreactivity. Asthma is managed in steps according to disease symptoms and severity. Treatment goals are to decrease symptoms, improve pulmonary function, and reduce overall morbidity and the associated cost of medical care. Antiasthma drugs are a key component of asthma management that are classified as either long-term-control medications that control symptoms and prevent disease exacerbations, or quick-relief medications that rapidly relieve airway obstruction and acute asthma symptoms. Several new leukotriene (LT) modulators have been developed that promise to improve asthma control, including LT receptor antagonists montelukast and zafirlukast and the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor zileuton. Each decreases symptoms and the use of rescue medication, and improves pulmonary function in patients with mild intermittent to moderate persistent asthma.     

Understanding How Asthmatics Perceive Symptom Distress During a Methacholine Challenge

The way, or ways, in which asthmatics recognize specific symptom(s) with varying degrees of their airway obstruction, or asthma severity, is poorly understood. Our purpose was to gain a better understanding of how asthma patients during acute episodes, based on their symptom perception, decide when to seek symptom relief. A cross-sectional design was used to study 32, 16 per group, African Americans and Caucasians with a mean age of 34.5 years. All had mild, stable asthma (FEV₁ ≥70%), were non-smokers, atopic, and had not used inhaled or oral steroids for 3 months. Their mean baseline FEV₁ was 97.5% predicted; all were controlled with intermittent use of a beta agonist inhaler. All had a bronchoconstrictor challenge using a provocative concentration of methacholine to achieve a 30% fall (PC30) in their FEV₁. After achieving a PC30 and before their first dose of a bronchodilator was given, all subjects were asked: “If you felt this way at home would you take your inhaler?” Subjects were blinded to the fact that the yes/no question was asked when their FEV₁ was reduced by 30%. In both groups, 44% responded “no” that they would not use their inhaler at that point in time. This finding suggests that those subjects, the 44% who failed to associate a change in their symptoms with increased airflow obstruction, may be at risk for life-threatening episodes.     

Managing Asthma in Expectant Mothers

Pregnancy does not appear to have a consistent effect on the frequency or severity of asthma. The most common cause of worsening asthma in pregnancy is likely to be noncompliance with medication. Emphasizing to the patient in advance that fetal well-being is dependent on maternal well-being may help prevent this.In general, well controlled asthma is not associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Essential to successful asthma management is patient education that helps to ensure effective medication use, avoidance of triggers, and prompt treatment. This education should include measurement of peak expiratory flow rate and a written asthma action plan. Most of the medications that are used to control asthma in the general population can be safely used in pregnant women. Inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists), cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), and inhaled and systemic corticosteroids all appear to be very well tolerated by the fetus. Budesonide and beclomethasone should be considered as the preferred inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma in pregnancy. Use of the leukotriene receptor antagonists zafirlukast and montelukast in pregnancy is probably safe but should be limited to special circumstances, where they are viewed essential for asthma control. Zileuton should not be used in pregnancy.Acute asthma exacerbations in pregnant women should be treated in a similar manner to that in non-pregnant patients. Maternal blood glucose levels should be monitored periodically in pregnant women receiving systemic corticosteroids because of the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia upon embryos and fetuses. During pregnancy, maternal arterial oxygen saturations should be kept above 95% if possible for fetal well-being. Ambulatory oxygenation should be checked prior to discharge to ensure that women do not desaturate with their daily activities.Acute exacerbations of asthma during labor and delivery are rare. Dinoprost, ergometrine, and other ergot derivatives can cause severe bronchospasm, especially when used in combination with general anesthesia, and should be avoided in asthmatic patients. Pregnant women who have been treated with corticosteroids in the past year may require stress-dose corticosteroids during labor and delivery. Most asthma medications, including oral prednisone, are considered compatible with breast-feeding.