NTRK testing: First results of the QuiP‐EQA scheme and a comprehensive map of NTRK fusion variants and their diagnostic coverage by targeted RNA‐based NGS assays

Gene fusions involving the three neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase genes NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 were identified as oncogenic drivers in many cancer types. Two small molecule inhibitors have been tested in clinical trials recently and require the detection of a NTRK fusion gene prior to therapeutic application. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and targeted next‐generation sequencing (tNGS) assays are commonly used for diagnostic profiling of gene fusions. In the presented study we applied an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme in order to investigate the suitability of FISH and RNA‐/DNA‐based tNGS for detection of NTRK fusions in a multinational and multicentric ring trial. In total 27 participants registered for this study. Nine institutions took part in the FISH‐based and 18 in the NGS‐based round robin test, the latter additionally subdivided into low‐input and high‐input NGS methods (regarding nucleic acid input). Regardless of the testing method applied, all participants received tumor sections of 10 formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks for in situ hybridization or RNA/DNA extraction, and the results were submitted via an online questionnaire. For FISH testing, eight of nine (88.8%) participants, and for NGS‐based testing 15 of 18 (83.3%) participants accomplished the round robin test successfully. The overall high success rate demonstrates that FISH‐ and tNGS‐based NTRK testing can be well established in a routine diagnostic setting. Complementing this dataset, we provide an updated in silico analysis on the coverage of more than 150 NTRK fusion variants by several commercially available RNA‐based tNGS panels.     

Gene fusion analysis in renal cell carcinoma by FusionPlex RNA‐sequencing and correlations of molecular findings with clinicopathological features

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) affects younger patients and often presents as advanced disease. Accurate diagnosis is required to guide clinical management. Here we evaluate the RNA‐sequencing FusionPlex platform with a 115‐gene panel including TFE3 and TFEB for tRCC diagnosis and correlate molecular findings with clinicopathological features. We reviewed 996 consecutive RCC cases from our institution over the preceding 7 years and retrieved 17 cases with histological and immunohistochemical features highly suggestive of either TFE3 (n = 16) or TFEB (n = 1). Moderate to strong labeling for TFE3 was present in 15 cases; two cases with weak TFE3 expression were melan‐A or cathepsin‐K positive. RNA‐sequencing detected gene rearrangements in eight cases: PRCC‐TFE3 (3), ASPSCR1‐TFE3 (2), LUC7L3‐TFE3 (1), SFPQ‐TFE3 (1), and a novel SETD1B‐TFE3 (1). FISH assays of 11 tumors verified six positive cases concordant with FusionPlex analysis results. Two other cases were confirmed by RT‐PCR. FusionPlex was superior to FISH by providing precise breakpoints for tRCC‐related genes in a single assay and allowing identification of both known and novel fusion partners, thereby facilitating clinicopathological correlations as fusion partners can influence tumor appearance, immunophenotype, and behavior. Cases with partner genes PRCC and novel partner SETD1B were associated with prominent papillary architecture while cases with partner genes ASPSCR1 and LUC7L3 were associated with a predominantly nested/alveolar pattern. The case with SFPQ‐TFE3 fusion was characterized by biphasic morphology mimicking TFEB‐like translocation RCC. We recommend FusionPlex analysis of RCC in patients under age 50 or when the histologic appearance suggests tRCC.     

Novel ASAP1‐USP6, FAT1‐USP6, SAR1A‐USP6, and TNC‐USP6 fusions in primary aneurysmal bone cyst

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a benign but locally aggressive neoplasm, with a tendency for local recurrence. In contrast to other bone tumors with secondary cystic change, ABC is characterized by USP6 gene rearrangement. There is a growing list of known USP6 fusion partners, characterization of which has been enabled with the advent of next‐generation sequencing (NGS). The list of known fusion partners includes CDH11, CNBP, COL1A1, CTNNB1, EIF1, FOSL2, OMD, PAFAH1B1, RUNX2, SEC31A, SPARC, STAT3, THRAP3, and USP9X. Using NGS, we analyzed a series of 11 consecutive ABCs and identified USP6 fusions in all cases, providing further evidence that USP6 fusions are universally present in primary ABCs. We identified four novel fusion partners in five ABCs and confirmed them by RT‐PCR and Sanger sequencing, ASAP1, FAT1, SAR1A, and TNC (in two cases). Because of high sensitivity and specificity, detection of a USP6 fusion by NGS may assist in differentiating between ABC and its mimics, especially in small biopsy samples when a definite diagnosis cannot be achieved on morphological grounds alone. Further studies with a large number of cases and follow‐up are needed to determine whether different fusion partners are associated with specific clinical and pathologic features of ABCs.     

Novel ZC3H7B‐BCOR,MEAF6‐PHF1, and EPC1‐PHF1 fusions in ossifying fibromyxoid tumors—molecular characterization shows genetic overlap with endometrial stromal sarcoma

PHF1 gene rearrangements have been recently described in around 50% of ossifying fibromyxoid tumors (OFMT) including benign and malignant cases, with a small subset showing EP400‐PHF1 fusions. In the remaining cases no alternative gene fusions have been identified. PHF1‐negative OFMT, especially if lacking S100 protein staining or peripheral ossification, are difficult to diagnose and distinguish from other soft tissue mimics. In seeking more comprehensive molecular characterization, we investigated a large cohort of 39 OFMT of various anatomic sites, immunoprofiles and grades of malignancy. Tumors were screened for PHF1 and EP400 rearrangements by FISH. RNA sequencing was performed in two index cases (OFMT1, OFMT3), negative for EP400‐PHF1 fusions, followed by FusionSeq data analysis, a modular computational tool developed to discover gene fusions from paired‐end RNA‐seq data. Two novel fusions were identified ZC3H7B‐BCOR in OFMT1 and MEAF6‐PHF1 in OFMT3. After being validated by FISH and RT‐PCR, these abnormalities were screened on the remaining cases. With these additional gene fusions, 33/39 (85%) of OFMTs demonstrated recurrent gene rearrangements, which can be used as molecular markers in challenging cases. The most common abnormality is PHF1 gene rearrangement (80%), being present in benign, atypical and malignant lesions, with fusion to EP400 in 44% of cases. ZC3H7B‐BCOR and MEAF6‐PHF1 fusions occurred predominantly in S100 protein‐negative and malignant OFMT. As similar gene fusions were reported in endometrial stromal sarcomas, we screened for potential gene abnormalities in JAZF1 and EPC1 by FISH and found two additional cases with EPC1‐PHF1 fusions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Novel PPP1CB‐ALK fusion in spindle cell tumor defined by S100 and CD34 coexpression and distinctive stromal and perivascular hyalinization

A novel group of S100‐ and CD34‐positive spindle cell tumors with distinctive stromal and perivascular hyalinization harboring recurrent gene fusions involving kinases including RAF1, BRAF, NTRK1/2/3, and RET have been recently reported. To our knowledge, no such cases harboring ALK rearrangements have been identified. We report a previously healthy 41‐year‐old male with a 12‐cm intramuscular shoulder mass. The tumor was composed of bland‐appearing spindled to epithelioid cells, arranged in a patternless pattern in a background of loose myxoid stroma containing striking amianthoid‐like stromal collagen and perivascular rings. In accordance with the previously reported tumors, the tumor cells showed diffuse immunopositivity with S100 and CD34, while lacking SOX10 expression. Targeted RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing identified a novel serine/threonine‐protein phosphatase PP1‐beta‐catalytic subunit (PPP1CB)‐ALK fusion gene. Although ALK break‐apart was not detected by FISH, likely due to a paracentric inversion of chromosome 2, the presence of the fusion was confirmed by Sanger sequencing showing a 10‐bp linker between exon 6 of PPP1CB and intron 19 of ALK while maintaining reading frame. Subsequent ALK‐1 immunostain exhibited diffuse cytoplasmic staining in the tumor cells. Our case expands the molecular genetic spectrum of the distinctive group of spindle cell tumors with CD34/S100+ immunophenotype, supporting the important role of various kinases as drivers of oncogenesis. Awareness of this entity including its unique morphologic and immunophenotypic features as well as its interchangeable kinase gene fusions is crucial for correct classification and potential targeted therapy, particularly in aggressive subsets.     

Clinical application of whole‐genome low‐coverage next‐generation sequencing to detect and characterize balanced chromosomal translocations

Individuals carrying balanced translocations have a high risk of birth defects, recurrent spontaneous abortions and infertility. Thus, the detection and characterization of balanced translocations is important to reveal the genetic background of the carriers and to provide proper genetic counseling. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS), which has great advantages over other methods such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), has been used to detect disease‐associated breakpoints. Herein, to evaluate the application of this technology to detect balanced translocations in the clinic, we performed a parental study for prenatal cases with unbalanced translocations. Eight candidate families with potential balanced translocations were investigated using two strategies in parallel, low‐coverage whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) followed‐up by Sanger sequencing and G‐banding karyotype coupled with FISH. G‐banding analysis revealed three balanced translocations, and FISH detected two cryptic submicroscopic balanced translocations. Consistently, WGS detected five balanced translocations and mapped all the breakpoints by Sanger sequencing. Analysis of the breakpoints revealed that six genes were disrupted in the four apparently healthy carriers. In summary, our result suggested low‐coverage WGS can detect balanced translocations reliably and can map breakpoints precisely compared with conventional procedures. WGS may replace cytogenetic methods in the diagnosis of balanced translocation carriers in the clinic.     

A low‐grade malignant soft tissue tumor with S100 and CD34 co‐expression showing novel CDC42SE2‐BRAF fusion with distinct features

Recently, a novel group of spindle cell tumors defined by S100 and CD34 co‐expression harboring recurrent fusions involving RET, RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 gene has been identified. Morphologically, they are characterized by monomorphic neoplasm cells, “patternless” growth pattern, stromal, and perivascular hyalinization, lacked necrosis. We reported a 52‐year‐old Chinese female patient with a S100 and CD34 co‐expression sarcoma presenting in the right proximal forearm. The forearm mass initially emerged 19 months ago when it was misdiagnosed as a solitary fibrous tumor and was surgically removed without further treatment. Microscopically, the primary and the recurred tumors share the same features, resembling the morphology of the recently characterized group. Nevertheless, some distinct features, such as predominantly epithelioid tumor cells and focally staghorn vessels, were also present in our case. Genomic profiling with clinical next‐generation sequencing was performed and revealed CDC42SE2‐BRAF gene fusion, MET amplification, and CDKN2A/B deletion. Both FISH and nested RT‐PCR were performed to confirm the gene fusion. The patient was treated with crizotinib for two cycles but showed no obvious benefit. The presented case adds to the spectrum of the novel, characterized solid tumors, and provides suggestions for emerging therapeutic strategies for precision medicine involving targeted kinase inhibitors.     

Variant WWTR1 gene fusions in epithelioid hemangioendothelioma—A genetic subset associated with cardiac involvement

The genetic hallmark of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a recurrent WWTR1‐CAMTA1 fusion, which is present in most cases bearing a conventional histology. A subset of cases is characterized by a distinct morphology and harbors instead of YAP1‐TFE3 fusion. Nevertheless, isolated cases lack these canonical fusions and remain difficult to classify. Triggered by an index case of a left atrial mass in a 76‐year‐old female with morphologic features typical of EHE, but which showed a WWTR1‐MAML2 fusion by targeted RNA sequencing, we searched our files for similar cases displaying alternative WWTR1 fusions. A total of 6 EHE cases were identified with variant WWTR1 fusions, four of them presenting within the heart. There were three females and three males, with a wide age range at diagnosis (21‐76 years, mean 62, median 69). The four cardiac cases occurred in older adults (mean age of 72, equal gender distribution); three involved the left atrium and one the right ventricle. One case presented in the vertebral bone and one in pelvic soft tissue. Microscopically, all tumors had morphologic features within the spectrum of classic EHE; two of the cases appeared overtly malignant. All cases were tested by FISH and four were investigated by targeted RNA sequencing. Two tumors harbored WWTR1‐MAML2 fusions, one WWTR1‐ACTL6A, and in three cases, no WWTR1 partner was identified. Of the four patients with follow‐up, two died of disease, one was alive with lung metastases, and the only patient free of disease was s/p resection of a T11 vertebral mass. Our findings report on additional genetic variants involving WWTR1 rearrangements, with WWTR1‐MAML2 being a recurrent event, in a small subset of EHE, which appears to have predilection for the heart.     

Targeted next generation sequencing of MLH1‐deficient,MLH1 promoter hypermethylated,and BRAF/RAS‐wild‐type colorectal adenocarcinomas is effective in detecting tumors with actionable oncogenic gene fusions

Oncogenic gene fusions represent attractive targets for therapy of cancer. However, the frequency of actionable genomic rearrangements in colorectal cancer (CRC) is very low, and universal screening for these alterations seems to be impractical and costly. To address this problem, several large scale studies retrospectivelly showed that CRC with gene fusions are highly enriched in groups of tumors defined by MLH1 DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency (MLH1d), and hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter (MLH1ph), and/or the presence of microsatellite instability, and BRAF/KRAS wild‐type status (BRAFwt/KRASwt). In this study, we used targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) to explore the occurence of potentially therapeutically targetable gene fusions in an unselected series of BRAFwt/KRASwt CRC cases that displayed MLH1d/MLH1ph. From the initially identified group of 173 MLH1d CRC cases, 141 cases (81.5%) displayed MLH1ph. BRAFwt/RASwt genotype was confirmed in 23 of 141 (~16%) of MLH1d/MLH1ph cases. Targeted NGS of these 23 cases identified oncogenic gene fusions in nine patients (39.1%; CI95: 20.5%‐61.2%). Detected fusions involved NTRK (four cases), ALK (two cases), and BRAF genes (three cases). As a secondary outcome of NGS testing, we identified PIK3K‐AKT‐mTOR pathway alterations in two CRC cases, which displayed PIK3CA mutation. Altogether, 11 of 23 (~48%) MLH1d/MLH1ph/BRAFwt/RASwt tumors showed genetic alterations that could induce resistance to anti‐EGFR therapy. Our study confirms that targeted NGS of MLH1d/MLH1ph and BRAFwt/RASwt CRCs could be a cost‐effective strategy in detecting patients with potentially druggable oncogenic kinase fusions.