Rehabilitation of the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow: an in vitro biomechanical study

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative contribution of muscle activity and the effect of forearm position on the stability of the medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient elbow. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm in both supination and pronation was performed using a custom elbow testing apparatus. Testing was first performed on intact specimens, then on MCL-deficient specimens. Elbow instability was quantified using an electromagnetic tracking device by measuring internal-external rotation and varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus. Compared with the intact elbow, transection of the MCL, with the arm in a vertical orientation, caused a significant increase in internal-external rotation during passive elbow flexion with the forearm in pronation, but forearm supination reduced this instability. Overall, following MCL transection the elbow was more stable with the forearm in supination than pronation during passive flexion. In the pronated forearm position simulated active flexion also reduced the instability detected during passive flexion, with the arm in a varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientation. The maximum varus-valgus laxity was significantly increased with MCL transection regardless of forearm position during passive flexion. We concluded that active mobilization of the elbow with the arm in vertical orientation during rehabilitation is safe in the setting of an MCL-deficient elbow with the forearm in a fully supinated and pronated position. Splinting and passive mobilization of the MCL-deficient elbow with the forearm in supination should minimize instability and valgus elbow stresses should be avoided throughout the rehabilitation period.     

肘关节内侧副韧带前束重建的生物力学研究

目的通过测量肘关节内侧副韧带(medial collateral ligament,MCL)前束生物力学指标,探讨前束完整及重建后对肘关节外翻稳定性的影响,评价采用人工肌腱、界面螺钉重建MCL前束疗效。方法成人完整上肢标本12具,男8具,女4具;左、右侧各6具;制成肘关节"骨-韧带"标本。采用生物力学及压敏胶片测量方法,分别测量MCL前束完整(对照组)及使用人工肌腱、界面螺钉重建后(实验组)肘关节屈曲0、30、60、90°时关节外翻松弛度、肱尺关节受力面积及肘关节内压强。结果两组在肘关节不同屈曲角度下,组内及组间关节松弛度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除肘关节屈曲0°时两组肘关节压强小于其余屈曲角度(P<0.05),及对照组小于实验组(P<0.05)外,两组其余各角度组内及组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除对照组内肘关节屈曲0°时肱尺关节受力面积大于其余屈曲角度(P<0.05)外,两组其余各角度组内及组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MCL前束对维持肘关节外翻稳定性具有重要意义,金属界面螺钉加人工肌腱重建后可即刻恢复内侧稳定。     

A biomechanical study of stability of the elbow to valgus stress before and after reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament

The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of the elbow to valgus loads after reconstruction of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). The MCL in 14 human cadaveric elbows was exposed with a muscle-splitting approach. Each sample was secured in a materials test frame,5 N-m valgus moments were applied in 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion, and baseline stability was measured. This sequence was performed after the anterior bundle was sectioned and again after ligamentous reconstruction was done with the Jobe technique. At 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion, reconstruction reproduced an average of 99%, 102%, 97%, and 89%, respectively, of the stability of the intact ligament. The only significant difference between intact and reconstructed samples was at 120 degrees of flexion (P <.05). We concluded that this procedure reliably restores stability to a ruptured MCL throughout the flexion arc in the immediate postoperative period.     

Stabilizers of capitellocondylar total elbow arthroplasty

The contribution of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL, LCL) and muscle forces to the kinematics and stability of the capitellocondylar total elbow arthroplasty was investigated in six fresh cadaveric elbows. The three-dimensional orientation of the ulna relative to the humerus was monitored with the use of an electromagnetic tracking device in neutral, valgus, and varus stress positions with (1) the ligaments intact, (2) LCL insufficiency obtained by osteotomizing the lateral epicondyle, (3) partial MCL insufficiency obtained by sectioning either the anterior or posterior bundle of the MCL, and (4) complete MCL insufficiency. Simulated muscle forces were applied as follows: (1) no load, (2) 1 kg each to the biceps and the brachialis and 2 kg to the triceps, and (3) 2 kg to the biceps and the brachialis and 4 kg to the triceps. The laxity was defined as the difference in valgus/varus orientation of the ulna in the valgus and varus stress positions. The laxity at 40°, 75°, and 110° elbow flexion was analyzed. The greatest laxity occurred with LCL insufficiency (40.7° ± 11.6°, average at three flexion angles) followed by that with MCL insufficiency (15.7° ± 9.9°), both of which were significantly larger than laxity with the intact ligaments (5.6° ± 2.5°). The laxity with the anterior bundle sectioned (12.0° ± 8.1°) was significantly greater than with the posterior bundle sectioned (3.3° ± 3.6°); thus the contribution of anterior bundle to stability was four times that of posterior bundle. Stabilizing effect of muscle loading was small in elbows with intact ligaments, whereas it was large with LCL or MCL insufficiency. Based on these data, we can see that the integrity of both the MCL and LCL is essential to maintain stability of this total elbow, the anterior bundle is a more important stabilizer than the posterior bundle, and the collateral ligaments seem to be the primary stabilizer and the musculature seems to be the secondary stabilizer. Careful implantation technique to preserve the collateral ligaments is required to obtain postoperative stability of this arthroplasty. Otherwise, routine exposure of the MCL and repair or reinforcement of the MCL, if deficient, may need to be considered during surgery.     

The effect of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability.

This study determined the effect of radial head fracture size and ligament injury on elbow kinematics. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were studied in an in vitro elbow simulator. Testing was performed with ligaments intact, with the medial collateral (MCL) or lateral collateral (LCL) ligament detached, and with both the MCL and LCL detached. Thirty degree wedges were sequentially removed from the anterolateral radial head up to 120 degrees . Valgus angulation and external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were determined for passive motion, active motion, and pivot shift testing with the arm in a vertical (dependent) orientation. Maximum varus-valgus laxity was calculated from measurements of varus and valgus angulation with the arm in horizontal gravity-loaded positions. No effect of increasing radial head fracture size was observed on valgus angulation during passive and active motion in the dependent position. In supination, external rotation increased with increasing fracture size during passive motion with LCL deficiency and both MCL and LCL deficiency. With intact ligaments, maximum varus-valgus laxity increased with increasing radial head fracture size. With ligament disruption, elbows were grossly unstable, and no effect of increasing radial head fracture size occurred. During pivot shift testing, performed with the ligaments intact, subtle instability was noted after resection of one-third of the radial head. In this in vitro biomechanical study, small subtle effects of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability were seen in both the ligament intact and ligament deficient elbows. These data suggest that fixation of displaced radial head fractures less than or equal to one-third of the articular diameter may have some biomechanical advantages; however, clinical correlation is required.     

Effects of elbow flexion and forearm rotation on valgus laxity of the elbow

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of valgus elbow laxity is difficult. The optimum position of elbow flexion and forearm rotation with which to identify valgus laxity in a patient with an injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of forearm rotation and elbow flexion on valgus elbow laxity. METHODS: Twelve intact cadaveric upper extremities were studied with a custom elbow-testing device. Laxity was measured with the forearm in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation at 30 degrees, 50 degrees, and 70 degrees of elbow flexion with use of 2 Nm of valgus torque. Testing was conducted with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, with the joint vented, after cutting of the anterior half (six specimens) or posterior half (six specimens) of the anterior oblique ligament of the ulnar collateral ligament, and after complete sectioning of the anterior oblique ligament. Laxity was measured in degrees of valgus angulation in different positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in valgus laxity with respect to elbow flexion within each condition. Overall, for both groups of specimens (i.e., specimens in which the anterior or posterior half of the anterior oblique ligament was cut), neutral forearm rotation resulted in greater valgus laxity than pronation or supination did (p < 0.05). Transection of the anterior half of the anterior oblique ligament did not significantly increase valgus laxity; however, transection of the posterior half resulted in increased valgus laxity in some positions. Full transection of the anterior oblique ligament significantly increased valgus laxity in all positions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vitro cadaveric study demonstrated that forearm rotation had a significant effect on varus-valgus laxity. Laxity was always greatest in neutral forearm rotation throughout the ranges of elbow flexion and the various surgical conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The information obtained from the present study suggests that forearm rotation affects varus-valgus elbow laxity. Additional investigation is warranted to determine if forearm rotation should be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow joint.     

重建肘关节外翻稳定性的生物力学研究

目的　评价肘关节桡骨头 (radial head,RH)切除、尺侧副韧带 (medial collateral ligament,MCL )损伤以及 RH假体置换、MCL重建后的外翻稳定性。　方法　新鲜成人尸体上肢标本 12侧 ,制成肘关节“骨 -韧带”标本 ,在2 N· m的外翻力矩作用下 ,分别在肘关节 0°、30°、6 0°、90°和 12 0°伸屈时 ,测量肘关节外翻松弛度 :1完整肘关节(n=12 ) ;2 MCL切断 (n=6 ) ;3RH切除 (n=6 ) ;4 MCL切断 +RH切除 (n=12 ) ;5 RH假体置换 (n=6 ) ;6 MCL重建(n=6 ) ;7RH假体置换 +MCL重建 (n=12 )。用 SPSS 10 .0统计软件包作方差分析 ,比较各组的外翻稳定性。　结果　完整肘关节的平均外翻松弛度最小 ;RH切除后 ,外翻松弛度增大 ;单纯 MCL切断 ,外翻松弛度大于单纯 RH切除 (P<0 .0 1) ;MCL切断 +RH切除 ,外翻稳定性最差 ;行 RH假体置换 ,对稳定性有改善 ;MCL重建与完整 MCL差异无统计学意义 (P>0 .0 5 ) ;RH假体置换同时重建 MCL ,效果最好。　结论　 MCL是抵抗肘关节外翻应力最主要的因素 ,RH是次要因素。在重建肘关节的外翻稳定性方面 ,MCL的重建比 RH的假体置换更重要。在无条件行 RH假体置换时 ,修复MCL是较好的手术方式。     

Single-strand reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament restores varus and posterolateral rotatory stability of the elbow

Because of a lack of biomechanical studies of lateral elbow ligament reconstruction in the literature, the initial stability afforded by 3 different techniques of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction was evaluated in 8 cadaveric elbows. The arm was mounted in a testing apparatus, and passive flexion was performed with the arm in varus and valgus orientations. A pivot shift test was performed with the arm in the vertical orientation. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify motion pathways. After intact testing, each specimen underwent sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments from the lateral epicondyle. Reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament was performed in a randomized sequence, consisting of proximal single-strand, distal single-strand, and double-strand tendon grafts. Division of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments from the lateral epicondyle caused a significant decrease in rotational stability when the pivot shift test was being performed (P <.0001). Varus-valgus stability also decreased after transection of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments (P <.0001). Reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament restored elbow stability to that of the intact state. There was no significant difference in stability between the single- and double-strand repair techniques (P >.05). This study demonstrates that both single- and double-strand reconstructions restore varus and posterolateral elbow stability and may be considered appropriate reconstructive procedures in patients with symptomatic insufficiency of the lateral ligaments of the elbow.     

Kinematics of partial and total ruptures of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow

In this study the kinematics of partial and total ruptures of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow are investigated. After selective transection of the medial collateral ligament of 8 osteoligamentous intact elbow preparations was performed, 3-dimensional measurements of angular displacement, increase in medial joint opening, and translation of the radial head were examined during application of relevant stress. Increase in joint opening was significant only after complete transection of the anterior part of the medial collateral ligament was performed. The joint opening was detected during valgus and internal rotatory stress only. After partial transection of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament was performed, there was an elbow laxity to valgus and internal rotatory force, which became significant after transection of 100% of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament and was maximum between 70 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion. No radial head movement was seen after partial or total transection of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament was performed. In conclusion, this study indicates that valgus or internal rotatory elbow instability should be evaluated at 70 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion. Detection of partial ruptures in the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament based on medial joint opening and increased valgus movement is impossible.     

Functional anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow: configuration of Y and its role

A previous anatomic study has revealed that the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex of the elbow has a Y-shaped configuration, which consists of a superior, an anterior, and a posterior band. The LCL complex, including the annular ligament, functions as a 3-dimensional (3D) Y-shaped structure. On the basis of this concept, joint laxity after transection of the anterior band was studied in 5 normal, fresh-frozen cadaver elbows with a 3D kinematic testing apparatus. Cutting the anterior band produced significant laxity to varus torque with a mean 5.9 degree at 10 degree of elbow flexion and caused significant laxity to torque in external rotation with a mean 8.5 degree at 40 degree of flexion. No significant laxity was observed during application of valgus or internal rotational torque. Further transection of the posterior band resulted in gross instability with dislocation of the ulnohumeral joint. The laxity occurring after severance of the anterior band suggests that these fibers play a role in preservation of elbow stability against varus and external rotational torque. These results indicate that the LCL functions as a complex with a Y structure and not as an isolated linear ligament. A concept of conjoint point is hypothesized for the function of the LCL complex to restrain posterolateral rotatory instability.     

Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow

The stabilizing influence of radial head arthroplasty was studied in eight medial collateral ligament deficient anatomic specimen elbows. An elbow testing apparatus, which used computer controlled pneumatic actuators to apply tendon loading, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. The motion pathways of the elbow were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device, with the forearm in supination and pronation. As a measure of stability, the maximum varus to valgus laxity over the range of elbow flexion was determined from the difference between varus and valgus gravity loaded motion pathways. After transection of the medial collateral ligament, the radial head was excised and replaced with either a silicone or one of three metallic radial head prostheses. Medial collateral ligament transection caused a significant increase in the maximum varus to valgus laxity to 18.0 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees. After radial head excision, this laxity increased to 35.6 degrees +/- 10.3 degrees. The silicone implant conferred no increase in elbow stability, with a maximum varus to valgus laxity of 32.5 degrees +/- 15.5 degrees. All three metallic implants improved the valgus stability of the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow, providing stability similar to the intact radial head. The use of silicone arthroplasty to replace the radial head in the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow must be questioned. Metallic radial head arthroplasty provides improved valgus stability, approaching that of an intact radial head.     

Correlation of Force to Deformation of the Anterior Bundle of the Medial Collateral Ligament Through Consideration of Band Laxity

The anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (AMCL) resists the loads that arise at the elbow during overhand throwing and has commonly been divided into posterior and anterior bands. While these anterior and posterior bands have been thought to bear the load at different flexion angles, any transition of the load distribution between the two bands is poorly understood and has not considered laxity (slack). This study considers the AMCL as three bands and quantifies the mechanical response to vertical distraction, simulating valgus‐load joint opening, through the sequential superposition of the band responses after the elimination of inherent laxity. Eight cadaveric elbow specimens were used for the study. The intact AMCL of each specimen was tested under vertical distraction in a specialized load frame at four elbow flexion angles and then subsequently retested after two longitudinal transections. The greatest laxity at full extension and full flexion belonged to the posterior (1.9 mm) and anterior (2.4 mm) band, respectively. At the lesser and higher flexion angles, the greatest structural stiffness belonged to the anterior and middle band. The overall AMCL was the most structurally stiff at 60°, with approximately 150 N of force required for 2% elongation. This study shows that the different bands of the AMCL may have different load bearing properties at different flexion angles, causing each band to support different proportions of an imposed load. The presence of the laxity may impose a load‐bearing delay, causing load‐bearing in each band to begin asynchronously. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2027–2034, 2019     

Elbow ligament strain under valgus load: a biomechanical study.

This study assessed the importance of the anterior and posterior bundles of the medial collateral ligament in the elbow by measuring in situ strain in response to valgus loads at three positions of forearm rotation throughout a full arc of motion. Strain in the anterior bundle was significantly greater than in the posterior bundle and increased with more flexion. The anterior bundle developed strain at a lower flexion angle (30 degrees) than the posterior bundle (60 degrees). Strain ratio increased with load increase for all flexion angles. Forearm position minimally affected strain. These results indicate that the anterior bundle is important in resisting a valgus load, particularly in mid-flexion, while the importance of the posterior bundle increases as the elbow approaches full flexion.     

The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability

PURPOSE: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is commonly performed for the management of acute or subacute instability after elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations. The effectiveness of transosseous repair of the MCL, as is typically performed clinically, in restoring the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow is of interest as is the effect of MCL tensioning on the initial stability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether suture repair of the MCL is able to restore the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow and to determine the optimal initial MCL repair tension. METHODS: Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an upper limb joint simulator. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion was generated while the kinematics were measured with the arm in the dependent and the valgus gravity-loaded orientations. After testing the intact elbow, the MCL was released at its humeral attachment and repaired using a transosseous suture technique at three different repair tensions: 20, 40, and 60 N. RESULTS: Medial collateral ligament repair using a transosseous suture technique restored the kinematics and stability of the MCL-deficient elbow. Motion pathways were affected by the magnitude of initial MCL tension. For all arm orientations and forearm positions, the 20-N and 40-N repairs were not statistically different from each other or from the intact MCL. The 60-N repairs, however, were often statistically different than the other groups, suggesting an overtightening that tended to pull the ulna into a varus position-especially in the midrange of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MCL repair using transosseous sutures provide adequate joint stability to permit early motion. There is a broad range of acceptable tensions for MCL repair, which is a favorable, clinically relevant finding. Clinical studies are needed to validate these in vitro results.     

Elbow subluxation and dislocation. A spectrum of instability.

After sequential releases of the ligaments and capsules of 13 fresh autopsy specimen elbows, external rotation and valgus moments with axial forces resulted in posterior dislocations in 12 of the 13 with the anterior medical collateral ligament (AMCL) intact. Kinematic displacements measured with a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device showed that dislocation involved posterolateral rotation of 34 degrees-50 degrees and 5 degrees-23 degrees valgus at about 80 degrees flexion. Dislocation is the final of three sequential stages of elbow instability resulting from posterolateral rotation, with soft-tissue disruption progressing from lateral to medial. In each stage, the pathoanatomy correlated with the pattern and degree of instability. Testing for valgus stability of the elbow during simulated active flexion revealed no significant increase (-0.3 degrees-2.4 degrees) in valgus laxity after reduction compared with the intact specimens (p greater than 0.05, beta = 0.1, delta = 2.5 degrees). In no case did the digitized AMCL origin-to-insertion distance increase beyond normal during the dislocation (p less than 0.01). The mechanism of dislocation during a fall on the outstretched hand would involve the body "rotating internally" on the elbow, which experiences an external rotation/valgus moment as it flexes. Posterior dislocations should therefore be reduced in supination. If valgus stability in pronation is demonstrated, the AMCL can be assumed to be intact, and rehabilitation in a hinged cast-brace with the elbow in full pronation can be commenced immediately.     

Contribution of monoblock and bipolar radial head prostheses to valgus stability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stabilizing effect of radial head replacement in cadaver elbows with a deficient medial collateral ligament. METHODS: Passive elbow flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation and in 80 degrees of pronation and supination was performed under valgus and varus loads (1) in intact elbows, (2) after a surgical approach (lateral epicondylar osteotomy of the distal part of the humerus), (3) after release of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament, (4) after release of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament and resection of the radial head, and (5) after subsequent replacement of the radial head with each of three different types of radial head prostheses (a Wright monoblock titanium implant, a KPS bipolar Vitallium [cobalt-chromium]-polyethylene implant, and a Judet bipolar Vitallium-polyethylene-Vitallium implant) in the same cadaver elbow. Total valgus elbow laxity was quantified with use of an electromagnetic tracking device. RESULTS: The mean valgus laxity changed significantly (p < 0.001) as a factor of constraint alteration. The greatest laxity was observed after release of the medial collateral ligament together with resection of the radial head (11.1 degrees +/- 5.6 degrees). Less laxity was seen following release of the medial collateral ligament alone (6.8 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees), and the least laxity was seen in the intact state (3.4 degrees +/- 1.6 degrees). Forearm rotation had a significant effect (p = 0.003) on valgus laxity throughout the range of flexion. The laxity was always greater in pronation than it was in neutral rotation or in supination. The mean valgus laxity values for the elbows with a deficient medial collateral ligament and an implant were significantly greater than those for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbows before radial head resection (p < 0.05). The implants all performed similarly except in neutral forearm rotation, in which the elbow laxity associated with the Judet implant was significantly greater than that associated with the other two implants. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study showed that a bipolar radial head prosthesis can be as effective as a solid monoblock prosthesis in restoring valgus stability in a medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. However, none of the prostheses functioned as well as the native radial head, suggesting that open reduction and internal fixation to restore radial head anatomy is preferable to replacement when possible.     

A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow

The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90 degrees , and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5+/-39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0+/-9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5+/-10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0+/-16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3+/-7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P<.001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P>.05, beta=.14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P<.004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.     

The effect of suture fixation of type I coronoid fractures on the kinematics and stability of the elbow with and without medial collateral ligament repair

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of suture repair of type 1 coronoid fractures on elbow kinematics in ligamentously intact and medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient elbows. Cadaveric testing was performed in stable and MCL-deficient elbows with radial head arthroplasty and with the coronoid intact, with the coronoid fractured, and after suture repair. Ulna versus humerus angulation was measured during active motion. Varus and valgus motion pathways were measured during passive gravity-loaded flexion. With intact ligaments, there was a small increase in valgus angulation after a type 1 fracture that was not corrected with suture fixation. With MCL deficiency, there was no change in kinematics regardless of coronoid status. Type 1 coronoid fractures cause only small changes in elbow kinematics that are not corrected with suture repair. MCL repair, rather than type 1 coronoid fixation, should be considered if the elbow remains unstable after radial head repair or replacement and lateral ligament repair.     

Medial collateral ligament insertion site and contact forces in the ACL-deficient knee.

The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency on medial collateral ligament (MCL) insertion site and contact forces during anterior tibial loading and valgus loading using a combined experimental-finite element (FE) approach. Our hypothesis was that ACL deficiency would increase MCL insertion site forces at the attachments to the tibia and femur and increase contact forces between the MCL and these bones. Six male knees were subjected to varus-valgus and anterior-posterior loading at flexion angles of 0 degrees and 30 degrees. Three-dimensional joint kinematics and MCL strains were recorded during kinematic testing. Following testing, the MCL of each knee was removed to establish a stress-free reference configuration. An FE model of the femur-MCL-tibia complex was constructed for each knee to simulate valgus rotation and anterior translation at 0 degrees and 30 degrees, using subject-specific bone and ligament geometry and joint kinematics. A transversely isotropic hyperelastic material model with average material coefficients taken from a previous study was used to represent the MCL. Subject-specific MCL in situ strain distributions were used in each model. Insertion site and contact forces were determined from the FE analyses. FE predictions were validated by comparing MCL fiber strains to experimental measurements. The subject-specific FE predictions of MCL fiber stretch correlated well with the experimentally measured values (R2 = 0.95). ACL deficiency caused a significant increase in MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to anterior tibial loading. In contrast, ACL deficiency did not significantly increase MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to valgus loading, demonstrating that the ACL is not a restraint to valgus rotation in knees that have an intact MCL. When evaluating valgus laxity in the ACL-deficient knee, increased valgus laxity indicates a compromised MCL.     

Ligamentous stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The lateral ulnar collateral ligament, the entire lateral collateral ligament complex, and the overlying extensor muscles have all been suggested as key stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether either an intact radial collateral ligament alone or an intact lateral ulnar collateral ligament alone is sufficient to prevent posterolateral rotatory instability when the annular ligament is intact. METHODS: Sequential sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments was performed in twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. At each stage of the sectioning protocol, a pivot shift test was performed with the arm in a vertical position. Passive elbow flexion was performed with the forearm maintained in either pronation or supination and the arm in the varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientations. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify the internal-external rotation and varus-valgus angulation of the ulna with respect to the humerus. RESULTS: Compared with the intact elbow, no differences in the magnitude of internal-external rotation or maximum varus-valgus laxity of the ulna were detected with only the radial collateral or lateral ulnar collateral ligament intact (p > 0.05). However, once the entire lateral collateral ligament was transected, significant increases in internal-external rotation (p = 0.0007) and maximum varus-valgus laxity (p < 0.0001) were measured. None of the pivot shift tests had a clinically positive result until the entire lateral collateral ligament was sectioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, when the annular ligament is intact, either the radial collateral ligament or the lateral ulnar collateral ligament can be transected without inducing posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.