Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) vs gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): improvement in intravascular signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast enhanced MR angiography (MRA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) to MRA with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA), a high relaxivity paramagnetic contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients referred for carotid artery stenosis were examined with MR angiography using a fast spoiled gradient echo sequence. Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA enhanced MR angiography were performed within 48-72 hours using a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg for Gd-BOPTA and 0.2 mmol/kg for Gd-DTPA, at a flow rate of 2 ml/s. Images were evaluated by two blinded radiologists. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations were performed comparing the sets of images from the two examinations. RESULTS: Qualitative evaluation demonstrated superior arterial contrast enhancement and vessel conspicuity with Gd-BOPTA compared with Gd-DTPA. Quantita-tive evaluation showed an improvement in both signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio with Gd-BOPTA. CONCLUSION: The greater relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA, at lower doses, compared with Gd-DTPA, provides higher intravascular signal and signal to noise ratio. Gd-BOPTA appears to be an optimal contrast agent for contrast enhanced MRA.     

Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. METHODS: The contrast agent Gd-BOPTA or Gd-DTPA was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg to 257 patients suspected of having malignant liver tumors. Dynamic phase images, spin-echo images obtained within 10 minutes of injection, and delayed images obtained 40 to 120 minutes after injection were acquired. All postcontrast images were compared with unenhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted images obtained immediately before injection. A full safety assessment was performed. RESULTS: The contrast efficacy for dynamic phase imaging was moderately or markedly improved in 90.9% (110/121) and 87.9% (109/124) of patients for Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA, respectively. At 40 to 120 minutes after injection, the cor- responding improvements were 21.7% (26/120) and 11.6% (14/121) for spin-echo sequences and 44.5% (53/119) and 19.0% (23/121) for breath-hold gradient-echo sequences, respectively. The differences at 40 to 120 minutes after injection were statistically significant (P < 0.02). Increased information at 40 to 120 minutes after injection compared with information acquired within 10 minutes of injection was available for 24.0% (29/121) of patients with Gd-BOPTA and for 14.5% (18/124) of patients with Gd-DTPA (P < 0.03). Adverse events were seen in 4.7% (6/128) and 1.6% (2/127) of patients receiving Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of Gd-BOPTA is equivalent to that of Gd-DTPA for liver imaging during the dynamic phase and superior during the delayed (40-120 minutes) phase of contrast enhancement. Both agents are safe for use in magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.     

Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) has a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and can be used for both dynamic and delayed liver MRI. This intraindividual, crossover study was conducted to compare 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for liver MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent two identical MR examinations separated by >or= 72 hours. Precontrast T1-FLASH-2D and T2-TSE sequences and postcontrast T1-FLASH-2D sequences were acquired during the dynamic and delayed (1-2 hours) phases after each contrast injection. Images were evaluated on-site by two independent, blinded off-site readers in terms of confidence for lesion detection, lesion number, character and diagnosis, enhancement pattern, lesion-to-liver contrast, and benefit of dynamic and delayed scans. Additional on-site evaluation was performed of the overall diagnostic value of each agent. RESULTS: Superior diagnostic confidence was noted by on-site investigators and off-site assessors 1 and 2 for 6, 4 and 2 patients with Gd-BOPTA, and for 3, 1 and 2 patients with Gd-DTPA, respectively. No consistent differences were noted for other parameters on dynamic phase images whereas greater lesion-to-liver contrast was noted for more patients on delayed images after Gd-BOPTA. More correct diagnoses of histologically confirmed lesions (n = 26) were made with the complete Gd-BOPTA image set than with the complete Gd-DTPA set (reader 1: 68% vs. 59%; reader 2: 78% vs. 68%). The overall diagnostic value was considered superior after Gd-BOPTA in seven patients and after Gd-DTPA in one patient. CONCLUSION: The additional diagnostic information on delayed imaging, combined with the possibility to use a lower overall dose to obtain similar diagnostic information on dynamic imaging, offers a distinct clinical advantage for Gd-BOPTA for liver MRI.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine

PURPOSE: To compare intraindividually gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for multi-station MR Angiography of the run-off vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one randomized healthy volunteers received either Gd-BOPTA or Gd-DTPA as a first injection and then the other agent as a second injection after a minimum interval of 6 days. Each agent was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight followed by a 25-mL saline flush at a single constant flow rate of 0.8 mL/second. Images were acquired sequentially at the level of the pelvis, thigh, and calf using a fast three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo sequence. Source, subtracted source, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and subtracted MIP image sets from each examination were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively on a segmental basis involving nine vascular segments. RESULTS: Significantly (P < 0.05) higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were noted for Gd-BOPTA compared to Gd-DTPA, with the more pronounced differences evident in the more distal vessels. Qualitative assessmentrevealed no differences in the abdominal vasculature, a preference for Gd-BOPTA in the pelvic vasculature, and markedly better performance for Gd-BOPTA in the femoral and tibial vasculature. Summation of individual diagnostic quality scores for each segment revealed a significantly (P = 0.0001) better performance for Gd-BOPTA compared to Gd-DTPA. CONCLUSION: Greater vascular enhancement of the run-off vasculature is obtained after Gd-BOPTA, particularly in the smaller more distal vessels. Enhancement differences are not merely dose dependent, but may be due to different vascular enhancement characteristics of the agents.     

Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard-dose gadopentate dimeglumine for delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for the evaluation of myocardial infarction (MI) and in the grading transmural extent on late-contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with clinically proven MI were examined with the use of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA and 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA in 2 days interval. All patients were examined with the use of segmented two-dimensional inversion-recovery turbo fast-field echo pulse sequence with an inversion time 210-300 milliseconds. Fifteen minutes time delay was used on both examinations after the injection of contrast agent. Contrast-to-noise ratio between normal myocardium and infarcted myocardium and signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the enhanced myocardium to blood pool was derived and compared for each contrast agent. RESULTS: A total of 61 infarcted segments were analyzed. All of the infarcted segments were visualized on both Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA enhanced images. There was statistically no significant difference between 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA and 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA in the mean contrast-to-noise ratio (10.19 versus 10.22; P = .96), SNR (14.29 versus 14.25; P = .96), and SIR (4.34 versus 4.21; P = .38) of the infarcted segments. Intraobserver agreement (kappa) between Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA were R1 = 91% and R2 = 86%. Interobserver agreements between the readers were Gd-DTPA = 85% and Gd-BOPTA = 88%. CONCLUSION: According to our data, the diagnostic efficacy of 0.1 mmol/kg dose Gd-BOPTA is equivalent to that of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for the assessment of MI on delayed enhanced magnetic resonance images.     

Comparison of Gd-BOPTA with Gd-DTPA in MR imaging of rat liver

A new lipophilic compound, gadolinium benzyloxypropionictetraacetate (BOPTA), with a high rate of biliary excretion was assessed as a magnetic resonance (MR) hepatospecific contrast-enhancing agent and compared with Gd-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) in MR imaging of normal rats. T1-weighted spin-echo images obtained before and after administration of each contrast agent at doses of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mmol/kg showed greater enhancement of the liver with Gd-BOPTA than with Gd-DTPA, with the advantage more evident at lower doses. Images obtained with an inversion recovery sequence at the null value of rat liver parenchyma after injection of 0.1- and 0.5-mmol/kg doses of the contrast agent provided better evidence of the greater and longer-lasting hepatic enhancement due to Gd-BOPTA when compared with that of Gd-DTPA. Gd-BOPTA is a potentially good contrast agent for obtaining prolonged enhancement of the liver, permitting studies during the long time needed to acquire conventional T1-weighted images.     

Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: mechanistic studies in animals

Mechanistic studies regarding the action of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg; MultiHance) in animals are presented, and the relevance of the results to protocols for MR imaging of the liver are discussed. Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg maintains all the characteristics of an extracellular contrast agent, but owing to a weak affinity for serum albumin, provides in these applications stronger signal intensities than contrast agents without such affinity at the same dose. This property can be taken advantage of for dynamic liver imaging. A unique property of Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg is that the contrast effective ion, Gd-BOPTA2-, enters hepatocytes selectively and reversibly through the sinusoidal plasma membrane using transport mechanisms other than the organic anion transport polypeptide. In a rate-limiting step, the ion is excreted by the multispecific organic anion transporter into the bile. The increase in liver distribution space of Gd-BOPTA2-, as compared to that of purely extracellular contrast agents, is identified as the principal mechanism of normal parenchymal signal enhancement. Microviscosity effects inside hepatocytes add to the relaxation effectiveness of Gd-BOPTA2-, while its presence in the bile and an affinity for intracellular macromolecules play subordinate roles only. Gd-BOPTA2- persists in hepatocytes beyond the times characteristic of dynamic imaging, providing delayed-phase contrast between normal hepatocytes and tumor cells. As a result, the conspicuity of small focal lesions and thus their detection is improved. Additionally, Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg allows sites of abscesses and systemically damaged tissue to be distinguished from healthy liver. Taken together these mechanistically-supported properties qualify the product as a versatile general MR contrast agent with added merits in liver imaging.     

Assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance angiography: phase I studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the vascular contrasting properties of a new MR contrast agent (gadobenate dimeglumine [Gd-BOPTA]), which presents higher relaxivity because of reversible, weak protein interaction, and, to compare these properties with a standard gadolinium agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two phase I trials compared intraindividually: (A) the vascular contrasting properties of Gd-BOPTA at three doses (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.2 mmol/kg body weight) and two flow rates (0.5 and 2.0 mL/s) in 10 volunteers; and (B) 0.1 mmol/kg body weight doses of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 2.0 mL/s using a modified magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence with a temporal resolution of 1 s/f. Quantitative (ROI analysis) and fully blinded qualitative (reader review) assessment of images was performed. RESULTS: A dose of 0.2 mmol/kg resulted in higher maximum intensities, longer median peak widths, and larger areas under the curve than did the lower doses (0.0125 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg). In the intraindividual comparison, Gd-BOPTA demonstrated significantly better vascular enhancement characteristics in terms of signal peak duration (p < 0.05), maximum signal intensity (p < 0.05), and area under the enhancement curve (p < 0.01). The multireader assessment for overall vascular contrast preferred Gd-BOPTA at p < 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-BOPTA was shown to exhibit preferential and different vascular enhancement properties as compared with Gd-DTPA for MRA.     

The efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) at 3 Tesla in brain magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to 1.5 Tesla and a standard gadolinium chelate using a rat brain tumor model

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze the differences in contrast enhancement using gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA or MultiHance) at 3 T versus 1.5 T and to compare Gd-BOPTA with a standard gadolinium chelate, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA or Magnevist), at 3 T in a rat glioma model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve rats with surgically implanted gliomas were randomized to either comparing Gd-BOPTA at 1.5 T versus 3 T (n=7) or comparing Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 3 T (n=5). Matched T1-weighted spin-echo techniques were used for both comparisons and the order of examinations was randomized. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion enhancement (LE) were evaluated using a region-of-interest analysis. A veterinary histopathologist evaluated all brain specimens. RESULTS: In the evaluation of Gd-BOPTA at 3 T and 1.5 T, there were significant increases in SNR, LE, and CNR at 3 T. Average increases in brain and tumor SNR were 93% (P<0.0001) and 92% (P<0.0001), respectively. CNR increased by 121% (P<0.0001). Comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 3 T demonstrated significantly higher CNR and LE with Gd-BOPTA. CNR increased by 35% (P=0.002). LE increased by 44% (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Gd-BOPTA provides significantly higher CNR at 3 T compared with 1.5 T and also demonstrates significantly higher CNR when compared with a standard Gd-chelate at 3 T. As a result of transient protein binding, Gd-BOPTA may be superior to standard gadolinium chelates in neurologic imaging at 3 T.     

Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) relative to that of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in patients and volunteers undergoing MRI for various clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 924 subjects were enrolled in 10 clinical trials in which Gd-BOPTA was compared with Gd-DTPA. Of these subjects, 893 were patients with known or suspected disease and 31 were healthy adult volunteers. Of the 893 patients, 174 were pediatric subjects (aged two days to 17 years) referred for MRI of the brain or spine. Safety evaluations included monitoring vital signs, laboratory values, and adverse events (AE). RESULTS: The rate of AE in adults was similar between the two agents (Gd-BOPTA: 51/561, 9.1%; Gd-DTPA: 33/472, 7.0%; P = 0.22). In parallel-group studies in which subjects were randomized to either agent, the rate of AE was 10.9% for Gd-BOPTA and 7.9% for Gd-DTPA (P = 0.21). In the subset of subjects receiving both agents in intraindividual crossover trials, the rate of AE was 8.0% for Gd-BOPTA and 8.5% for Gd-DTPA (P = 0.84). Results of other safety assessments (laboratory tests, vital signs) were similar for the two agents. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of Gd-BOPTA is similar to Gd-DTPA in patients and volunteers. Both compounds are equally well-tolerated in patients with various disease states undergoing MRI.     

A comparative study between Gd-BOPTA, a biliary excretion contrast medium, and Gd-DTPA in the magnetic resonance imaging of the rat liver

A new lipophilic compound, Gd-BOPTA, presenting a high rate (38.6%) of biliary excretion was tested as an hepato-specific MR contrast agent. Its adequacy was compared to that of Gd-DTPA in laboratory animals. T1-weighted spin-echo sequences (TR 220 ms, TE 20 ms) both before and after the administration of the 2 contrast agents (doses: 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mmol/kg) showed better liver enhancement with Gd-BOPTA than with Gd-DTPA. Gd-BOPTA superiority was more evident at lower doses, while at 1.0 mmol/kg a comparable enhancement was achieved. Inversion recovery sequence at the T-null of liver parenchyma before contrast (TR 800 ms, TE 30 ms, TI 100 ms) was performed after the injection of 0.1 and 0.5 mmol/kg of Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA. This sequence allowed the good and long-lasting liver enhancement achieved with Gd-BOPTA to be even better demonstrated, while Gd-DTPA provided only a slight and early enhancement with 0.1 mmol/kg and returned to baseline values 60' after the injection of the highest dose (0.5 mmol/kg). Gd-BOPTA proved to be a good contrast agent to obtain prolonged liver enhancement, thus providing the radiologist with the long time needed to acquire conventional T1-weighted pulse sequences.     

Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) possesses a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared to other available gadolinium contrast agents. The study was conducted to evaluate the benefits of this increased relaxivity for MR imaging of intracranial enhancing brain lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males, 14 females) with suspected glioma or cerebral metastases were evaluated. Patients received Gd-BOPTA and either Gd-DTPA (n = 23) or Gd-DOTA (n = 22) in fully randomized order at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight and at a flow rate of 2 ml/s. The second agent was administered 1-14 days after the first agent. Images were acquired precontrast (T1wSE, T2wFSE sequences) and at sequential postcontrast time-points (T1wSE sequences at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and 15 min and a T1wSE-MT sequence at 12 min) at 1.0 or 1.5 T using a head coil. Determination of contrast enhancement was performed quantitatively (lesion-to-brain ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and percent enhancement) and qualitatively (border delineation, internal morphology, contrast enhancement, and diagnostic preference) by two independent, fully blinded readers. RESULTS: Images from 43/45 patients were available for quantitative assessment. After correction for precontrast values, significantly greater lesion-to-brain ratio (P < .003), contrast-to-noise ratio (P < .03), and percent enhancement (P < .0001) was noted by both readers for Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images at all time-points from 2 min postcontrast. Qualitative assessment of all patients similarly revealed significant preference for Gd-BOPTA for lesion border delineation (P < .004), lesion internal morphology (P < .008), contrast enhancement (P < .0001), and diagnostic preference (P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: The greater T1 relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA permits improved visualization of intracranial enhancing lesions compared to conventional gadolinium agents.     

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions

The aim of this study was to determine the value of delayed-phase imaging (DPI) of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MR imaging for the evaluation of focal hepatic tumors compared with precontrast imaging and early dynamic phase imaging. The MR images were obtained in 48 patients with 98 focal hepatic tumors. Three-dimensional gradient-echo (GRE) imaging obtained before and 30, 60, and 1 h after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine. Each image set was analyzed qualitatively (lesion detection, conspicuity, delineation, and enhancement pattern on DPI) and quantitatively [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), tumor–liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)]. Improved lesion-to-liver contrast during the dynamic phase imaging was observed compared with precontrast images. The DPI showed a homogeneous enhancement of liver parenchyma and distinctive enhancement features of focal liver lesions: metastases (85%) showed a target shaped enhancement, and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) showed an inhomogeneous (58%) or homogeneous enhancement (21%). The DPI showed better performance for the detection of metastases than other images by increasing lesion delineation (p<0.05). The absolute CNR of metastasis measured from periphery of the tumors on DPI was greater than precontrast and arterial phase imaging (p<0.05). The Gd-BOPTA during both dynamic and delayed phases provides valuable information for the characterization of focal liver lesions, and furthermore, Gd-BOPTA-enhanced DPI contributed to the improved detection of liver metastasis compared to precontrast and early dynamic imaging.     

Gadopentetate dimeglumine as a bowel contrast agent: safety and efficacy

To determine the safety and efficacy of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a bowel contrast agent, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (0.5 T) was performed with a formulation of gadopentetate dimeglumine (1.0 mmol/L of gadopentetate dimeglumine, 15 g/L of mannitol, 6-17 mL/kg) in 133 patients with intraabdominal mass lesions. Mostly short-lived gastrointestinal side effects were noted in 32% of patients. Gadopentetate dimeglumine provided uniform hyperintense marking of the bowel and contrast enhancement in the region of interest in 81% of patients. Among 78 patients with images obtained both before and after administration of contrast material, post-contrast improvement of lesion delineation was found in 62%. Among 55 patients with only postcontrast images, gadopentetate dimeglumine proved useful in 65%. Intravenous injection of scopolamine or glucagon effectively eliminated "ghost" images of the opacified bowel in 105 of 109 cases. The authors conclude that gadopentetate dimeglumine is a safe and effective bowel contrast agent for MR imaging.     

Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg: experimental disease imaging.

The novel tissue-specific contrast agent, Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg, was tested in MR imaging of experimental focal liver disease and of acute myocardial ischemia in rats. Directly implanted liver tumors and blood-borne metastases were used as models for focal liver disease and occlusion of the lower anterior descending coronary artery as model for acute ischemia. The studies with implanted tumors, at a dose level of 250 mumol/kg, showed a very high (370%) and persistent (greater than 2 h) increase in the tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), owing to selective enhancement of normal liver parenchyma signal intensity. While all blood-borne metastases showed a similar late CNR enhancement, some of them experienced early contrast loss due to transient signal intensity enhancement. In myocardial imaging, Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg produced a signal intensity enhancement in normal myocardium and an injured area-normal area CNR enhancement which were both much stronger and more persistent than those produced by Gd-DTPA/Dimeg.     

Dynamic MRI of a hypovascularized liver tumor model: Comparison of a new blood pool contrast agent (24-gadolinium-DTPA-cascade-polymer) with gadopentetate dimeglumine

We evaluated the enhancement properties of a new blood pool contrast agent (24-gadolinium-diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid [Gd-DTPA]-cascade-polymer) in comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine in 24 rabbits with an experimentally induced VX-2 liver tumor. Dynamic MRI of the liver was performed before, immediately after, and within 15 seconds to 30 minutes after contrast agent administration. Relative signal intensities and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of both agents were evaluated. After blood pool agent administration, a significantly higher CNR between liver and tumor was observed within 2 to 30 minutes after injection as compared with the CNR after gadopentetate dimeglumine. Within 4 to 30 minutes after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine, the relative signal intensities of tumor were significantly higher than after administration of the blood pool agent. In conclusion, the new blood pool contrast agent demonstrated a significantly better CNR of the experimental hypovascularized liver tumor than gadopentetate dimeglumine.     

Administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of intracranial tumors: dosage and field strength.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of patients with intracranial tumors at mid and high field strength. METHODS: In 88 patients, an open-label phase III multicenter dose-finding study was performed at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T MR units. Before and after (5, 15, 25 minutes) intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, imaging was performed with T1-weighted spin-echo sequences. RESULTS: With 0.1 mmol/kg yielding the highest values, tumor enhancement and numerical tumor/brain contrast showed dose-dependent 5-minute postcontrast values (P less than 0.05). Compared to 5-minute postcontrast values, there was no significant change at 15 and 25 minutes. Although the lowest values of enhancement were found at 0.5 T, differences in enhancement among the field strengths were not statistically significant. The numerical data were confirmed by visual assessment of tumor/brain contrast. Eighty to 90% of cases had diagnostically valuable enhancement at 0.1 mmol/kg, 50% at 0.05 mmol/kg, and 10% at 0.025 mmol/kg (P less than 0.05). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine is more effective at enhancing intracranial tumors than lower doses at mid and high field MR units.     

Pulse repetition time and contrast enhancement: simulation study of Gd-BOPTA and conventional contrast agent at different field strengths

OBJECTIVES: To investigate theoretically enhancement and optimal pulse repetition times for Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA enhanced brain imaging at 0.23, 1.5, and 3.0 T. METHODS: The theoretical relaxation times of unenhanced, conventional contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) and new generation contrast agent (Gd-BOPTA) enhanced glioma were calculated. Then, simulation of the signals and contrasts as a function of concentration and pulse repetition time (TR) in spin echo sequence was done at 0.23, 1.5, and 3.0 T. The effect of echo time (TE) on tumor-white matter contrast was also clarified. Three patient cases were imaged at 0.23 T as a test of principle. RESULTS: Gd-BOPTA may give substantially better glioma-to-white matter contrast than Gd-DTPA but is more sensitive to the length of TR. These characteristics are accentuated at 0.23 T. Optimal TR lengths are shorter for Gd-BOPTA than for Gd-DTPA enhanced imaging at all field strengths. TR optimized for Gd-DTPA may thus give suboptimal contrast in Gd-BOPTA enhanced imaging. Higher enhancement with Gd-BOPTA is further accentuated by short TE. CONCLUSION: Appropriate TRs at 0.23 T appear to be approximately 300 to 400 milliseconds and 250 to 300 milliseconds, at 1.5 T 500 to 600 milliseconds and 400 to 450 milliseconds and at 3.0 T 550 to 650 milliseconds and 475 to 525 milliseconds using Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA, respectively. For Gd-BOPTA enhanced imaging, it seems justified to optimize TR according to contrast and seek options like parallel excitation (Hadamard encoding) for increasing the number of slices and SNR.     

Evaluation of the hepatocyte-specific contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine for MR imaging of acute hepatitis in a rat model

This work was conducted to test the hypothesis that contrast-enhanced MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents facilitates quantitation and mapping of diffuse liver diseases such as hepatitis and cirrhosis. Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg, Bracco SpA, Milano, Italy) is a new paramagnetic hepatocytespecific contrast agent currently undergoing clinical trials. We have assessed the usefulness of gadobenate dimeglumine for the diagnosis of diffuse liver diseases in a rat model of chemically induced hepatitis. The study was based on the measurements of in vivo liver relaxation times as well as on the acquisition of standard SE images. Acute hepatitis considerably reduced the degree of T1 shortening of liver parenchyma caused by intravenous injection of .25 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine. Analogously, the enhancement of the MRI signal intensity of the liver of rats with hepatitis observed in T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) images was inferior, in terms of both strength and duration, to that recorded in control rats at doses of .25 mmol/kg and .075 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine. Our results show that gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR imaging has the potential for visualization of hepatitis and for assessment of liver function. Our conclusions differ from those previously published on this subject by other authors. The reasons that led to differing conclusions are discussed.     

Detection of liver metastases: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging examinations

PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging for detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients known to have malignancy and suspected of having focal liver lesions at ultrasonography (US) underwent 1.0-T MR imaging with gradient-recalled-echo T1-weighted breath-hold sequences before, immediately after, and 60 minutes after Gd-BOPTA injection. Subsequently, MR imaging was performed with turbo spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery T2-weighted sequences before and 60 minutes after ferumoxides administration. All patients subsequently underwent intraoperative US within 15 days, and histopathologic analysis of their resected lesion-containing specimens was performed. Separate qualitative analyses were performed to assess lesion detection with each contrast agent. Quantitative analyses were performed by measuring signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) on pre- and postcontrast Gd-BOPTA and ferumoxides MR images. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank and Monte Carlo tests. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was superior to that of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection (P <.05). Ferumoxides MR images depicted 36 (97%) of 37 metastases detected at intraoperative US, whereas Gd-BOPTA MR images depicted 30 (81%) metastases during delayed phase and 20 (54%) during dynamic phase. All six metastases identified only at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging were 5-10 mm in diameter. There was a significant increase in CNR between the lesion and liver before and after ferumoxides administration (from 3.8 to 6.8, P <.001) but not before or after Gd-BOPTA injection (from -4.8 to -5.5, P >.05). CONCLUSION: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging seems to be superior to Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Copyright RSNA, 2002