Cost analysis of endoscopic antireflux procedures: endoluminal plication vs. radiofrequency coagulation vs. treatment with a proton pump inhibitor

BACKGROUND: Both endoluminal gastroplication and radiofrequency coagulation of the lower esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) represent emerging endoscopic therapies for GERD. The economic impact of endotherapy for GERD has not been described. The aim of this study was to apply a decision analysis model to compare the costs of endoluminal gastroplication vs. the Stretta procedures vs. a proton pump inhibitor for treatment of GERD. A cost minimization approach was used. METHODS: Model entry criteria were GERD responsive to daily or twice daily administration of a proton pump inhibitor. Performance characteristics of endotherapy were determined from published data. The baseline probabilities for annual endotherapy failure rates (20%), partial failure rates (10%), and complication rates (1%) were varied through a plausible range by using sensitivity analysis. Cost data for endotherapy were calculated from per case instrumentation costs plus professional fees plus facility fees for ambulatory patient classification codes; cost of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor was based on national average wholesale price. The endpoint was sustained resolution of GERD symptoms. RESULTS: In patients requiring twice daily use of a proton pump inhibitor for symptom relief, endotherapy proves to be the most economical strategy after 17 months. If uniform endotherapy failure rates over time are assumed, medication regains superiority after 29 months. Sensitivity analysis revealed that a proton pump inhibitor remains the most economical option beyond 3 years, provided annual endotherapy failure rates remain greater than 20% (endoluminal gastroplication) or 19% (Stretta). Pharmacotherapy is the least costly approach, irrespective of time, if the daily cost of a proton pump inhibitor is less than $140 a month or endotherapy costs more than $3400. For patients in whom symptoms are relieved with once daily dosing with a proton pump inhibitor, medication remains the most economical option regardless of endotherapy failure rate. CONCLUSION: Endotherapy appears to offer an economical treatment option for patients requiring a proton pump inhibitor twice daily, with its cost superiority enduring for 2.5 years. More long-term follow-up data are required to determine the durability of the endotherapy benefit over time.     

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: 12-month follow-up for the North American open-label trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate-term (12-month) safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in patients with symptomatic GERD. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with chronic heartburn that required maintenance antisecretory therapy received a single, endoscopically placed, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia 1 cm distal to the gastroesophageal junction. At baseline and 12 months after plication, patients completed the GERD Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, as well as a medication use diary. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were obtained at baseline and 3 months after plication. At 6 months after plication, the 24-hour pH study was repeated. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up, 40 (70%) were no longer taking a proton pump inhibitor. Median GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores were improved compared with baseline while taking medication (19.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.0001) and while not taking medication (13.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.002). At 6 months after the procedure, an improvement in distal esophageal acid exposure was demonstrated in 40 of 51 patients (80%), with a decrease of 39% in the median percentage of time the pH was less than 4 (p < 0.0001). Normal pH scores were observed in 30% of patients. All procedure-related adverse events occurred acutely, as previously reported, and no new adverse event was observed during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Full-thickness plication at the gastroesophageal junction is an effective endoscopic procedure for treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. It reduces reflux symptoms and antisecretory medication use over at least a 1-year period.     

Endoscopic,deep mural implantation of Enteryx for the treatment of GERD: 6-month follow-up of a multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic implantation of Enteryx, a biocompatible, non-biodegradable liquid polymer for the treatment of GERD. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with heartburn symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were enrolled. Inclusion requirements were HRQL score < or = 11 on PPI and > or = 20 off PPI, and 24-hour PH probe with > or = 5% total time at PH < or = 4. Patients with a hiatus hernia > 3 cm, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, or esophageal motility disorder were excluded. Using a 4-mm needle tipped catheter during standard endoscopy, implants were made in 3-4 quadrants deep into the wall of the cardia. Use of PPI medications, pH-metry, manometry, GERD symptoms, and patient quality of life were assessed over a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: At 6 months, PPI use was eliminated in 74% and reduced by > 50% in 10% of patients. The median HRQL score improved from 24.0 pre-implant (baseline off PPIs) to 4.0 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean total esophageal acid exposure time was 9.5% pretherapy and 6.7% at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean LES length increased from 2.0 cm at baseline to 3.0 cm posttherapy (p = 0.003). There were no clinically serious adverse events. Transient mild-to-moderate chest pain commonly occurred after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic implantation of Enteryx is a safe and effective therapy for eliminating or decreasing the need for PPI medications, improving GERD symptoms and patient quality of life, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure among patients suffering from GERD.     

The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial

BACKGROUND: This multicenter prospective study investigated the longer-term (12 month) safety and efficacy of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 118 patients with chronic heartburn and/or regurgitation who required antisecretory medication daily and had demonstrated pathologic esophageal acid exposure, a sliding hiatal hernia (相似文献   

Long-term outcomes of endoluminal gastroplication: a U.S. multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Endoluminal gastroplication has shown promise for the treatment of GERD in short-term studies. Until now, long-term outcome data have been lacking. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter trial enrolled 85 patients with GERD to be treated with endoluminal gastroplication. Inclusion criteria were 3 or more heartburn or regurgitation episodes per week, >4.2% time in 24 hours with esophageal pH < 4, and dependency on antisecretory medications. Exclusion criteria were the presence of varices, achalasia, aperistalsis, or previous gastric resection. Patients underwent manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and symptom severity scoring before and after the procedure. Patient diaries were used to assess medication use and to estimate annual medication cost. RESULTS: At 1- and 2-year follow-up, patients had significant reductions in median heartburn symptom scores (72 at baseline [interquartile range (IQR) 90-48] vs. 4 at 12 months [IQR 43-0] and 16 at 24 months [IQR 53-3.5]; p < 0.0001 vs. baseline) and median regurgitation symptoms (2 at baseline [IQR 3-1] vs. 0 at 12 months (IQR 1-0) and 1 at 24 months [IQR 1-0]; p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Of all patients, 59% and 52% showed heartburn symptom resolution at 12 and 24 months, respectively ( p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Also, 83% and 77% had regurgitation symptom resolution at 12 and 24 months, respectively (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Proton pump inhibitor use also was significantly reduced at 12 and 24 months after the procedure. At 2-year follow-up, median annualized medication costs were reduced by 88% (1381 US dollars) (p < 0.0001). Endoluminal gastroplication significantly reduced the duration and the number of episodes of esophageal acid exposure (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Only 7 patients experienced adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic gastroplication is safe and effective, and is associated with symptom reductions in patients with GERD for at least 24 months.     

Long-term results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD: sustained improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and drug use at 4-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The Stretta endoscopic antireflux procedure has effectively controlled symptoms of patients with GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication up to 1 year. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Stretta procedure for patients with GERD based on symptom control, quality of life (QOL), and medication use. DESIGN: Prospective single-center case series. SETTING: Academic endoscopy referral center. PATIENTS: Adults with GERD symptoms and partial response to daily antisecretory medication. INTERVENTION: We have used the Stretta procedure for patients with GERD diagnosed by endoscopic or pH testing since 2000. Our primary assessment was a validated health-related QOL score for heartburn and regurgitation and GERD symptoms index performed at baseline, 12, 36, and 48 months after treatment. A secondary outcome measure was the dose and the frequency of antisecretory pharmaceutical use. RESULTS: We performed the Stretta procedure in 83 consecutive patients with persistent GERD symptoms. Complete matched data for follow-up evaluations are reported at 12, 36, and 48 months. The mean GERD QOL score was 2.4 (baseline), 4.6 (36 months), and 4.3 (48 months, P < .001). The mean GERD symptom score was 2.7 (baseline), 0.3 (36 months), and 0.6 (48 months P < .001). Daily medication usage was 100% (baseline) and 13.6% (48 months, P < .001). LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study design, lack of control arm, and lack of 24-hour pH. CONCLUSIONS: For these GERD patients followed to 4 years, the Stretta procedure was a safe, effective, and durable treatment, with significant and sustained improvements in GERD symptoms, QOL, and PPI elimination.     

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: A novel endoscopic full-thickness plication device has been designed to inhibit gastroesophageal reflux by placing a transmural plication near the gastroesophageal junction under direct endoscopic visualization. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in the treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. METHODS: Patients with chronic heartburn requiring maintenance therapy with antisecretory medication were recruited. Exclusion criteria were the following: hiatal hernia (>2 cm), grade III and IV esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. The following were assessed over a follow-up period of 6 months: GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, medication use, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry. Patients underwent a single, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia just distal to the gastroesophageal junction. Re-treatment was not permitted. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 46.3 years, range 23-71 years) underwent endoscopic full-thickness plication (mean procedure time 17.2 minutes). At 6 months after plication, proton pump inhibitor therapy had been eliminated in 74% of previously medication-dependent patients. Median GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved 67% (19.0 vs. 5.0; p<0.001). Improvements also were observed in median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and SF-36 Health Survey mental and physical composite scores. Median esophageal acid exposure improved significantly (10 vs. 8; p<0.008) with normalization of pH noted in 30% of patients. No significant change in esophageal manometry was noted. One gastric perforation occurred and was managed conservatively without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a single full-thickness plication placed at the gastroesophageal junction reduced symptoms, medication use, and esophageal acid exposure associated with GERD.     

Sustained improvement in symptoms of GERD and antisecretory drug use: 4-year follow-up of the Stretta procedure

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with GERD do not respond to medical therapy. The Stretta radiofrequency antireflux procedure represents an alternative to failed drug therapy for GERD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess symptom and medication changes after the Stretta procedure during a 4-year follow-up period. DESIGN: Prospective case series on intent-to-treat basis. SETTING: Community practice. PATIENTS: Patients with GERD with persistent symptoms despite twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medications. INTERVENTIONS: The Stretta procedure was performed in drug-refractory patients with GERD diagnosed by the presence of endoscopically evidenced esophagitis or abnormal esophageal pH testing. Symptom assessment was performed with a validated health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (with and without medication) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after treatment. Complications of the procedure and medication usage were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Significant changes in symptom scores, GERD quality-of-life parameters, and medication usage on the basis of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We report on a series of 109 consecutive patients treated with the Stretta procedure who have reached 4-year follow-up. Complete long-term follow-up assessment was available in matched data for 109 patients at 12 months, 108 patients at 24 months, 102 patients at 36 months, and 96 patients at 48 months. A second procedure was performed in 13 patients. Heartburn scores decreased from 3.6 to 1.18 (P < .001), total heartburn score (GERD health-related quality-of-life questionnaire) decreased from 27.8 to 7.1 (P < .001), and patient satisfaction improved from 1.4 to 3.8 (P < .001) (see ). Medication usage decreased significantly from 100% of patients on twice-daily PPI therapy at baseline to 75% of patients showing elimination of medications or only as-needed use of antacids/over-the-counter PPIs at 48 months (P < 0.005). There were no serious complications of the procedure. LIMITATIONS: This is an uncontrolled, nonrandomized case series in consecutive patients that does not include long-term pH or motility studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study in drug-refractory patients with GERD found the Stretta procedure to be a safe, effective, and durable treatment that produced significant improvements in heartburn and quality of life and decreased medication usage during a 4-year period of follow-up.     

Increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: normalization by treatment with a proton pump inhibitor

Background and Aim: Mucosal injury caused by gastroesophageal reflux may result in changes in esophageal mucosal blood flow. Little is known about esophageal mucosal blood flow in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we examined esophageal mucosal blood flow and the effects of treatment in patients with GERD. Methods: The subjects included 41 cases (21 males and 20 females, mean age 64.2 years) in whom endoscopy was warranted in patients complaining of heartburn and/or regurgitation. We also studied six normal control subjects. Patients underwent endoscopy, laser Doppler flow meter measurements, and endoscopic ultrasonography before and after treatment. Results: Esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow was increased in patients with GERD compared with the control patients. The thickness of the whole esophageal wall and that of the mucosal and submucosal layers of the esophagus correlated significantly with esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow. The increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow significantly decreased after 4 weeks' treatment with lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the pathophysiology or underlying mechanisms of GERD includes increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow, which correlates with the thickness of the esophageal wall, but is reversible and responds to treatment with lansoprazole. This suggests that proton pump inhibitors can effectively treat GERD and promote histological normalization of the mucosa and submucosa in the lower esophagus.     

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD

BACKGROUND: In this multi-center study, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were investigated. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with classic symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/or regurgitation), a daily anti-secretory medication requirement, and at least partial symptom response to drugs were enrolled. All patients had pathologic esophageal acid exposure by 24-hour pH study, a 2 cm or smaller hiatal hernia, grade 2 or less esophagitis, and no significant dysmotility or dysphagia. RF energy was delivered with a catheter and thermocouple-controlled generator to create submucosal thermal lesions in the muscle of the GEJ. GERD symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 0, 1, 4, and 6 months with the short-form health survey (SF-36). Anti-secretory medications were withdrawn 7 days before each assessment of symptoms and pH/motility study. Medication use, endoscopic findings, esophageal acid exposure, and motility were assessed at 0 and 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-two men and 15 women underwent treatment. At 6 months there were improvements in the median heartburn score (4 to 1, p < or = 0.0001), GERD score (26 to 7, p < or = 0.0001), satisfaction (1 to 4, p < or = 0.0001), mental SF-36 (46.2 to 55.5, p = 0.01), physical SF-36 (41.1 to 51.9, p < or = 0.0001), and esophageal acid exposure (11.7% to 4.8%, p < or = 0.0001). Esophagitis was present in 25 patients before treatment (15 grade 1 and 10 grade 2) and 8 had esophagitis at 6 months (4 grade 1 and 4 grade 2, p = 0.005). At 6 months, 87% no longer required proton pump inhibitor medication. There was no significant change in median lower esophageal sphincter pressure (14.0 to 12.0 mm Hg, p = 0.19), peristaltic amplitude (64 to 66 mm Hg, p = 0.71), or lower esophageal sphincter length (3.0 to 3.0, p = 0.28). There were 3 self-limited complications (fever for 24 hours, odynophagia lasting for 5 days, and a linear mucosal injury that was healed after 3 weeks). CONCLUSION: RF energy delivery significantly improved GERD symptoms, quality of life, and esophageal acid exposure while eliminating the need for anti-secretory medication in the majority of patients with a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical disease severity but with minimal active esophagitis or hiatal hernia.     

Short‐term and long‐term effect of diaphragm biofeedback training in gastroesophageal reflux disease: an open‐label,pilot, randomized trial

This study investigated the effectiveness of diaphragm biofeedback training (DBT) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A total of 40 patients with GERD treated at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between September 2004 and July 2006 were randomized to receive DBT and rabeprazole proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or rabeprazole alone. The DBT + rabeprazole group received DBT during the 8‐week initial treatment; the rabeprazole group did not. During the 6‐month follow up, all patients took acid suppression according to their reflux symptoms, and the patients in the DBT + rabeprazole group were required to continue DBT. The primary outcome (used for power analysis) was the amount of acid suppression used at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were reflux symptoms, health‐related quality of life (HRQL), and esophageal motility differences after the 8‐week treatment compared with baseline. Acid suppression usage significantly decreased in the DBT + rabeprazole group compared with the rabeprazole group at 6 months (P < 0.05). At 8 weeks, reflux s ymptoms and GERD‐HRQL were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05), without difference between them. Crural diaphragm tension (CDT) and gastroesophageal junction pressure (GEJP) significantly increased in the DBT + rabeprazole group (P < 0.05), but without change in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. There was no significant change in CDT, GEJP, and LES pressure compared with baseline in the rabeprazole group. In conclusion, long‐term DBT could reduce acid suppression usage by enhancing the anti‐reflux barrier, providing a non‐pharmacological maintenance therapy and reducing medical costs for patients with GERD.     

Belching: dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease?

OBJECTIVES: Eructation (belching) is a common symptom seen in clinical practice. Because either belching or heartburn may result from transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, it has been proposed that belching may be a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this retrospective study we evaluated the prevalence of belching in dyspepsia and GERD and the relation of belching to acid reflux events documented by pH monitoring. METHODS: We examined the prevalence, frequency, and severity of belching and other GERD symptoms by use of standardized questionnaires in 180 GERD patients (group A) and 78 dyspeptic controls (group B) referred for evaluation at our institution. GERD was defined as either endoscopic esophagitis (or Barrett's esophagus) or positive DeMeester score (>14.2) on pH monitoring or both. Dyspeptic patients had normal endoscopy and pH studies. We also analyzed the relationship of belching to acid reflux events during the 24-h period of pH studies. RESULTS: Of 180 GERD patients, 132 (70%) reported belching during pH monitoring, versus 63 of 78 dyspeptic patients (80%) (p = ns). Similarly, 163 of 180 GERD patients (90%) reported heartburn versus 64 of 78 of dyspeptic patients (82%) (p = ns). Review of symptom questionnaires revealed no significant difference in belching severity between groups. However, heartburn and acid regurgitation were significantly more severe among GERD patients. There was a significantly higher correlation of both heartburn and belching with acid events in patients with GERD compared with patients with dyspepsia. In addition, although both belching and heartburn were significantly improved in patients with GERD, belching scores remained unchanged after proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: Belching is as common and as severe in patients with dyspepsia as it is in patients with GERD. Belching and heartburn in GERD patients are more likely correlated with episodes of pathological acid reflux. Because belching cannot be clinically used as a discriminatory symptom, ambulatory pH monitoring should be considered to elucidate the relationship of belching to acid reflux in patients with dyspepsia or GERD.     

Influence of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery at the Gastroesophageal Junction (the Stretta Procedure) on Symptoms,Acid Exposure,and Esophageal Sensitivity to Acid Perfusion in Gastroesophagal Reflux Disease

Several studies have demonstrated that radiofrequency energy delivery at the gastroesophageal junction (the Stretta procedure) induces symptom relief in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), although improvement of acid exposure on pH monitoring was usually limited. A role for decreased esophageal sensitivity has been suggested. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of Stretta on symptoms, acid exposure, and sensitivity to esophageal acid perfusion in GERD. Thirteen patients with established proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent GERD (three males; mean age, 51±10 years) participated in the study. Before and 6 months after the procedure symptom score, pH monitoring and Bernstein acid perfusion test were performed. The latter was done by infusing HCl (pH 0.1) at a rate of 6 ml/min 15 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction for a maximum of 30 min or until the patients experienced heartburn. Results were compared by Student’s t-test. Stretta procedure time was 51±4 min and no complications occurred. After 6 months, the symptom score was significantly improved (12.5±2.0 to 7.5±2.1; P<0.05), seven patients no longer needed daily PPI, and acid exposure was significantly decreased (11.6%±1.6% to 8.5%±1.8% of time pH<4; P<0.05). The time needed to induce heartburn during acid perfusion decreased from 9.5±2.3 to 18.1±3.4 min (P=0.01), and five patients became insensitive to 30-min acid perfusion, versus none at baseline (P=0.04). In conclusion, the Stretta procedure induces subjective improvement of GERD symptoms and decreases esophageal acid exposure. In addition, esophageal acid sensitivity is decreased 6 months after the Stretta procedure. The mechanism underlying this finding and its relevance to symptom control require further studies.     

胃食管反流病诊断技术的进展

胃食管反流病（GERD）的患病率近年来在我国有上升趋势。目前诊断GERD的手段较多，如典型症状（烧心和反酸）、质子泵抑制剂（PPT）试验和上消化道内镜检查等，尤其是GERD的诊断技术，包括最初的X线钡餐以及食管放射性核素检查和24h食管pH监测，到新近出现的食管多通道腔内阻抗监测和无线pH监测等，为胃食管反流提供了客观的证据。     

Helicobacter pylori: a debated factor in gastroesophageal reflux disease

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection is steadily decreasing in developing countries, and this has been paralleled by an increasing incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and of the esophagogastric junction. The prevalence of H. pylori infection, which is on the decline in Europe and in the United States, is probably related to improvements in sanitary conditions and socioeconomic status. These epidemiological data do not support a role for H. pylori in the pathogenesis of GERD, but at the same time suggest a negative association with the rising incidence in esophageal diseases. While H. pylori infection clearly does not cause GERD, it may protect certain susceptible individuals from the development of GERD and its complications. There are conflicting reports that GERD can develop after H. pylori eradication and that proton pump inhibitors are less effective in suppressing intragastric acidity in H. pylori negative patients--reasons not to eradicate H. pylori in GERD patients. On the contrary, other data suggest an increase in the development of atrophic gastritis in GERD patients (H. pylori positive) on long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy - a reason to eradicate H. pylori. Preexisting lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction, susceptibility to GERD, unmasking of latent GERD, and patterns and severity of gastritis may be important factors contributing to the development of GERD rather than just the presence or absence of infection with H. pylori.     

An algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of refractory GERD

Patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are not responding to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) given once daily are very common. These therapy-resistant patients have become the new face of GERD in clinical practice in the last decade. Upper endoscopy appears to have a limited diagnostic value. In contrast, esophageal impedance with pH testing on therapy appears to provide the most insightful information about the subsequent management of these patients. Commonly, doubling the PPI dose or switching to another PPI will be offered to patients who failed PPI once daily. Failure of such therapeutic strategies is commonly followed by assessment for weakly or residual acidic reflux. There is growing information about the potential value of compounds that can reduce transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation rate. Esophageal pain modulators are commonly offered to patients with functional heartburn although supportive clinical studies are still missing.     

难治性胃食管反流病的诊疗

难治性胃食管反流病目前已成为临床上的棘手问题。其发生机制尚未完全阐明。上消化道内镜、食管内动态pH监测以及食管多通道腔内阻抗-pH值监测等技术能够对难治性胃食管反流病的诊断提供帮助。通过改善患者的服药依从性以及调整质子泵抑制剂的剂量、种类和服药时间,配合促胃肠动力药、一过性下食管括约肌松弛抑制剂、疼痛调节剂或抗反流手术均有助于改善患者的顽固症状。     

Treatment of patients with persistent heartburn symptoms: a double-blind, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Common treatment practices in patients who continue to be symptomatic on proton pump inhibitor once-daily treatment include either increasing the dosage or the use of supplemental medication. This trial's purpose was to compare 2 therapeutic strategies, increasing the proton pump inhibitor dosage to twice daily versus switching to another proton pump inhibitor, in patients with persistent heartburn while receiving standard-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial included patients with persistent heartburn symptoms while receiving therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment for 8 weeks with either single-dose esomeprazole (40 mg once daily) (n = 138) or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (n = 144). The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of heartburn-free days from day 8 to the end of treatment. RESULTS: Single-dose esomeprazole was at least as effective as twice-daily lansoprazole for the primary end point of percentage of heartburn-free days during the study period (54.4% and 57.5%, respectively). Symptom scores improved from baseline in similar numbers of patients for heartburn (83.3% of patients in each group), acid regurgitation (76.8% vs 72.9%, P = .58), and epigastric pain (67.4% vs 61.1%, P = .32), and rescue antacid use was also similar (0.4 tablets/day vs 0.5 tablets/day, P = .50). CONCLUSIONS: Switching patients with persistent heartburn on a standard-dose proton pump inhibitor to a different proton pump inhibitor was as effective as increasing the proton pump inhibitor dosage to twice daily for controlling heartburn symptoms.     

Impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Plication of the gastroesophageal junction by endoscopic suturing has been reported to improve symptoms and reduce acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mechanisms underlying these effects are not well defined. The aims of our study were to determine the impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in patients with GERD. METHODS: In 15 patients (7 males) with GERD (heartburn, % time esophageal pH < 4 greater than 4%, +/- history of erosive esophagitis within 6 months), two plications were performed circumferentially 1 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy and combined postprandial esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed before and 6 months after treatment; 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring and symptom assessment were also performed before, and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Six months after treatment, the rate of transient LES relaxations (tLESRs) was decreased by 37% (p < 0.05) and basal LES pressure had increased from 4.3 +/- 2.2 mmHg to 6.2 +/- 2.1 mmHg (p < 0.05). The rate of postprandial reflux events and acid exposure time were not altered. Endoscopic suturing significantly reduced 24-h esophageal acid exposure from 9.6% (9.0-12.1) to 7.4% (3.9-10.1) at 6 months, due predominantly to a reduction in upright acid exposure. The reduction in total 24-h acid exposure was sustained to 12 months. At repeat endoscopy, only one plication was evident in 6 patients (40%) at 6 months. Seven patients (47%) remained off medications at 6 and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction results in a reduction in the rate of tLESRs, and an increase in basal LES pressure. These changes in LES function result in only a modest reduction in gastroesophageal reflux.     

Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically heralded by the substernal burning pain of heartburn. On endoscopic examination, about one third of GERD subjects with heartburn have erosive disease, and the remainder have nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). Unlike patients with erosive disease, those with NERD (∼ 50%) often do not respond to therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), raising the question of whether they have NERD and, if they do, whether the cause of their symptoms is similar to those who respond to PPIs. Recently, biopsies established that subjects with heartburn and PPI-responsive NERD, like those with erosive esophagitis, have lesions within the esophageal epithelium known as dilated intercellular space (DIS). In this article, we discuss the physicochemical basis for DIS in acid-injured esophageal epithelium and its significance in GERD. Although DIS is not pathognomic of GERD, it is a marker of a break in the epithelial (junctional) barrier reflecting an increase in paracellular permeability.