Pantoprazole.

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of pantoprazole are reviewed. Pantoprazole is a gastric hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (H+/K(+)-ATPase) inhibitor. It shares the same core structure as other currently available proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). The FDA-labeled indication is the short-term treatment of erosive esophagitis. PPIs act by selectively inhibiting H+/K(+)-ATPase in the secretory canaliculus of the stimulated parietal cell. Understanding the pharmacodynamics of PPIs is more relevant than knowing their pharmacokinetics, since the duration of action depends on the rate of de novo proton-pump regeneration, not the duration of drug circulation in the body. Pantoprazole is well absorbed, undergoes little first-pass metabolism, and has an absolute bioavailability of approximately 77%. Pantoprazole has been evaluated in more than 100 clinical trials involving more than 11,000 patients. It is effective in treating erosive esophagitis and duodenal and gastric ulcers. It is also effective as adjunctive treatment with antimicrobials in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Pantoprazole has been shown to control acid production in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Pantoprazole is well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse effects are headache, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. The recommended oral dosage for erosive esophagitis is 40 mg once a day for up to eight weeks. The recommended i.v. dose is 40 mg given over 15 minutes once a day in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who are unable to take oral medication. Pantoprazole appears to be as safe and effective as other PPIs in acid-related disorders.     

Lansoprazole: an update of its place in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and also exhibits antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori in vitro. Current therapy for peptic ulcer disease focuses on the eradication of H. pylori infection with maintenance therapy indicated in those patients who are not cured of H. pylori and those with ulcers resistant to healing. Lansoprazole 30 mg combined with amoxicillin 1g, clarithromycin 250 or 500mg, or metronidazole 400 mg twice daily was associated with eradication rates ranging from 71 to 94%, and ulcer healing rates were generally >80% in well designed studies. In addition, it was as effective as omeprazole- or rabeprazole-based regimens which included these antimicrobial agents. Maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg/day was significantly more effective than either placebo or ranitidine in preventing ulcer relapse. Importantly, preliminary data suggest that lansoprazole-based eradication therapy is effective in children and the elderly. In the short-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), lansoprazole 15, 30 or 60 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, ranitidine 300 mg/day or cisapride 40 mg/day and similar in efficacy to pantoprazole 40 mg/day in terms of healing of oesophagitis. Lansoprazole 30 mg/day, omeprazole 20 mg/day and pantoprazole 40 mg/day all provided similar symptom relief in these patients. In patients with healed oesophagitis. 12-month maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg/day prevented recurrence and was similar to or more effective than omeprazole 10 or 20 mg/day. Available data in patients with NSAID-related disorders or acid-related dyspepsia suggest that lansoprazole is effective in these patients in terms of the prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications, ulcer healing and symptom relief. Meta-analytic data and postmarketing surveillance in >30,000 patients indicate that lansoprazole is well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. After lansoprazole monotherapy commonly reported adverse events included dose-dependent diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, headache and abdominal pain. After short-term treatment in patients with peptic ulcer, GORD, dyspepsia and gastritis the incidence of adverse events associated with lansoprazole was generally < or = 5%. Similar adverse events were seen in long-term trials, although the incidence was generally higher (< or = 10%). When lansoprazole was administered in combination with amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole adverse events included diarrhoea, headache and taste disturbance. In conclusion, lansoprazole-based triple therapy is an effective treatment option for the eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Preliminary data suggest it may have an important role in the management of this infection in children and the elderly. In the short-term management of GORD, lansoprazole monotherapy offers a more effective alternative to histamine H2-receptor antagonists and initial data indicate that it is an effective short-term treatment option in children and adolescents. In adults lansoprazole maintenance therapy is also an established treatment option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. Lansoprazole has a role in the treatment and prevention of NSAID-related ulcers and the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia; however, further studies are needed to confirm its place in these indications. Lansoprazole has emerged as a useful and well tolerated treatment option in the management of acid-related disorders.     

Pantoprazole: a new proton pump inhibitor in the management of upper gastrointestinal disease

Pantoprazole, the third proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to become available, has been extensively investigated. Pantoprazole inhibits acid more powerfully than histamine H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) and omperazole 20 mg and raises median 24-h gastric pH from about 1.5 to 3-4 in healthy volunteers and in duodenal ulcer patients to above 5. Results from studies have confirmed that pantoprazole is superior to H(2)RAs in speed of healing and symptom relief in patients with peptic ulcer. In patients with duodenal ulcer pantoprazole was as effective as omperazole 20 mg and in patients with gastric ulcer pantoprazole was statistically superior to omeprazole 20 mg after 4 weeks. In triple combination therapy of peptic ulcer disease, the mean eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori in data pooled from 32 pantoprazole-based studies was 86% and compliance with treatment was about 90%. Results pooled from 5 large clinical trials of gastroesophageal reflux disease showed healing rates significantly superior to those achieved with H(2)RAs and similar to those of other PPIs at 4 and 8 weeks. Symptom relief was more rapid with pantoprazole and maintenance treatment kept the majority of patients in remission; relapse rates at 1 year were 25-28% on 20 mg daily and 6-22% on 40 mg daily. Maintenance treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg has been shown to keep most patients with aggressive or refractory ulcer and reflux disease in remission for up to 3 years. Pantoprazole was also effective in the management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In volunteers given aspirin, pantoprazole 40 mg proved significantly superior to ranitidine and placebo in preventing the development of mucosal damage and was significantly better than placebo in preventing gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer in arthritic patients on nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance and long-term studies have confirmed that pantoprazole is effective and safe for the short- and long-term management of peptic ulcer and reflux disease, with side effects similar in incidence and type to those of H(2)RAs.     

Prevention of erosive oesophagitis relapse with pantoprazole

AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole and ranitidine in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. METHODS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients (349) with endoscopically documented healed erosive oesophagitis (grade 0 or 1) were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole (10, 20 or 40 mg/q.d.s.) or ranitidine (150 mg/b.d.). Erosive oesophagitis status was assessed endoscopically at months 1, 3, 6 and 12 or when relapse symptoms appeared (relapse = reappearance of erosive oesophagitis grade 2 within 12 months). Symptom-free days were also assessed. RESULTS: Pantoprazole 20- and 40-mg were significantly more effective than ranitidine in maintaining healing regardless of initial erosive oesophagitis grade. Response was dose-related. After 12 months 78, 55, 46 and 21% of patients remained healed (40-, 20-, 10-mg pantoprazole and ranitidine). Pantoprazole 40-mg produced significantly more symptom-free days (83%) than ranitidine (58%). Heartburn-free days/nights were significantly higher with pantoprazole 40-mg (92 and 93%) than ranitidine (73 and 77%). The most frequent reason for discontinuation, unsatisfactory efficacy, occurred most often with ranitidine (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Once-daily pantoprazole therapy prevented relapse of healed erosive oesophagitis more effectively than ranitidine and with fewer heartburn days. Response to pantoprazole was dose-related. Pantoprazole 40-mg was the most effective regimen and consistent in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing with a good safety and tolerability profile.     

Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of gastric acid-related diseases in adults

Esomeprazole (Nexium); S-omeprazole) is a single optical isomer proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) approved for the management of reflux oesophagitis, the symptomatic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), the prevention and healing of NSAID-associated gastric ulcer disease (and the prevention of NSAID-associated duodenal ulcers in the UK), the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and associated duodenal ulcer disease (and prevention of relapse of H. pylori-associated peptic ulcers in the UK), and the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (and other hypersecretory syndromes in the US).Once-daily oral esomeprazole 40 mg demonstrates greater antisecretory activity than other PPIs. Overall, in well designed clinical studies of 4 weeks' to 6 months' duration in patients with GORD, esomeprazole had similar or better efficacy than other agents. In patients requiring ongoing treatment with NSAIDs, co-therapy with once-daily esomeprazole 20 or 40 mg achieved relief of gastrointestinal symptoms or prevented ulcer occurrence, more effectively than placebo. Esomeprazole was also better than ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in healing NSAID-associated gastric ulcers. In addition, the drug has demonstrated efficacy as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori infection, the healing of H. pylori associated duodenal ulcers and the prevention of relapse of gastric ulcers. Esomeprazole also effectively treated patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Esomeprazole is generally well tolerated with an adverse-event profile similar to that of other PPIs. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of esomeprazole for the management of GORD and H. pylori eradication remains undisputed, and the data support its use for the first-line treatment of NSAID-associated gastric ulcer disease and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.     

Esomeprazole

Esomeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, is the S-isomer of omeprazole and is the first such inhibitor to be developed as a single isomer. Esomeprazole provided better control of intragastric pH than omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in trials conducted in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or healthy volunteers (n = 20 to 115). In 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials esomeprazole 20 and/or 40mg for 8 weeks produced higher healing rates of erosive oesophagitis and better symptom control than omeprazole 20 mg in patients with GORD. Esomeprazole 10, 20 or 40mg once daily for 6 months maintained healing versus placebo (p < 0.001) in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed erosive oesophagitis in 2 large randomised, double-blind multicentre trials. Similarly, symptom-driven on-demand use of esomeprazole effectively controlled symptoms of GORD (heartburn) for 6 months in 2 large placebo-controlled trials. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 7 days was as effective for eradication of Helicobacter pylori as longer omeprazole-based therapy in 2 randomised double-blind trials including about 450 patients each. Endoscopically confirmed ulcer healing 4 weeks after treatment initiation was reported in about 90% of patients with active duodenal ulcer in both treatment groups. Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 10 days was more effective than esomeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of H. pylori in 233 patients.     

Pantoprazole provides rapid and sustained symptomatic relief in patients treated for erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Effective symptom control is a primary concern of most heartburn suffers. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole, placebo and the H2 antagonist nizatidine in relieving symptoms in patients with erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Data from two randomized, double-blind studies were pooled. Patients received pantoprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg, or placebo daily (study 1, n = 603), or pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg daily or 150-mg nizatidine b.d. (study 2, n = 243) for either 4 or 8 weeks. Endoscopy was performed at baseline, week 4 and week 8. Persistent absence of symptoms was defined as the first day that no symptoms were reported by the patient on that day or any subsequent study day. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage (P < 0.05) of pantoprazole patients reported elimination of all symptoms by week 8. Daytime heartburn, night-time heartburn and regurgitation were significantly better controlled with pantoprazole (with a dose-response at most time-points). Absence of symptoms was a powerful predictor of healing; presence of symptoms correlated poorly. CONCLUSION: Pantoprazole is more effective than placebo or nizatidine for controlling heartburn and acid regurgitation in patients with erosive oesophagitis. Relief of GERD symptoms is highly predictive of healing of erosive oesophagitis at 4 and 8 weeks.     

Effect of increasing esomeprazole and pantoprazole doses on acid control in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, dose-response study

BACKGROUND and objective: In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), dose escalation or drug switching may be considered in those with symptoms that persist despite standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. This study set out to assess whether increasing the dosage of oral esomeprazole and pantoprazole improves acid control in GORD patients, and to compare the pharmacodynamic efficacy of esomeprazole and pantoprazole administered at different dosages. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, six-way crossover study that included Helicobacter pylori-negative GORD patients (aged 20-60 years) with <30% of time with intragastric pH>4. Patients were treated with oral once-daily esomeprazole 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, and pantoprazole 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, for 5 days. The main outcome measures were time with intragastric pH>4 over 24 hours, median pH over 24 hours and area under the hydrogen ion versus time curve on day 5 for each treatment period. RESULTS: Dose escalation with both PPIs improved acid control. The proportion of time with intragastric pH>4 (day 5) was 46.7% with esomeprazole 20 mg/day, 58.6% with esomeprazole 40 mg/day, and 65.8% with esomeprazole 80 mg/day; the corresponding percentages with pantoprazole were 28.6%, 36.9% and 44.9%, respectively. On a milligram-per-milligram basis, esomeprazole provided greater acid control than pantoprazole (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Dose escalation with oral esomeprazole and pantoprazole improves acid control in patients with GORD, although esomeprazole provides significantly greater acid control on a milligram-per-milligram basis.     

Rabeprazole: an update of its use in acid-related disorders.

Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion. In 8-week studies, among patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), rabeprazole 20 mg/day or 10mg twice daily was as effective as omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in the healing of GORD. Symptom relief with rabeprazole was superior to that provided by placebo and ranitidine and similar to omeprazole. In long-term trials rabeprazole 10 mg/day was similar to omeprazole 20 mg/day in a 2-year study and superior to placebo in 1-year studies, in both the maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GORD. In nonerosive GORD, 4-week studies have shown rabeprazole to be more effective than placebo in relieving heartburn and various other gastrointestinal symptoms. Data among patients with Barrett's oesophagus suggest rabeprazole 20 mg/day may be more effective than placebo in maintaining healing of associated oesophagitis after 1 year of treatment. One-week triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin achieved eradication rates of > or =85%. Rabeprazole is as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole when included as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. Eradication rates of >90% were achieved when rabeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day was included as part of a quadruple eradication regimen. As monotherapy for peptic ulcer healing and symptom relief, 4- to 8-week studies have shown rabeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day to be superior to placebo and ranitidine and have similar efficacy to omeprazole. Preliminary 1-year data among 16 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome suggest rabeprazole 60 to 120 mg/day can resolve and prevent the recurrence of symptoms and endoscopic lesions associated with this condition. In clinical trials of up to 2 years' duration the tolerability of rabeprazole is similar to that of placebo, ranitidine and omeprazole. Common adverse events assigned to rabeprazole have been diarrhoea, headache, rhinitis, nausea, pharyngitis and abdominal pain. Histological changes and increases in serum gastrin levels were unremarkable and typical of proton pump inhibitors. No dosage adjustment is necessary in renal and mild to moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole is a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor. It has proven efficacy in healing, symptom relief and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcers and GORD and can form part of effective H. pylori eradication regimens. It is an important alternative to H(2) antagonists and an additional treatment option to other proton pump inhibitors in the management of acid-related disorders.     

Efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 40 mg versus 80 mg in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole is a substituted benzimidazole which is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion by its action upon H+, K+- ATPase. METHODS: Pantoprazole 40 mg and 80 mg were compared in a randomized double-blind study in 192 out-patients with stage II or III (Savary-Miller classification) reflux oesophagitis. Patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 97) or pantoprazole 80 mg (n = 95), once daily before breakfast for 4 weeks. Treatment was extended for a further 4 weeks if the oesophagitis had not healed. RESULTS: After 4 weeks complete healing of the reflux oesophagitis was seen in 78% of protocol-correct patients given pantoprazole 40 mg daily (n = 86), and in 72% in the 80 mg (n = 87) group. The cumulative healing rates after 8 weeks were 95 and 94%, respectively (P > 0.05, Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel), and time until healing of oesophagitis comparable in both groups. Differences between doses were also not significant in an intention-to-treat analysis. Both dosing schedules were well tolerated and the patients experienced remarkable symptom relief. No adverse event or changes in laboratory values of clinical significance could definitely be ascribed to the trial medication. CONCLUSION: The 40 mg pantoprazole dosage is comparable to 80 mg in reflux oesophagitis, both in efficacy and tolerability.     

Effect of pantoprazole on 24-h intragastric pH and serum gastrin in humans.

Pantoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor, is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. In this review, data are presented from nine controlled, prospective, clinical pharmacodynamic investigations. The effects of oral and intravenous doses of pantoprazole (administered for 5-7 days) on continuously monitored 24-h intragastric pH and serum gastrin are discussed: oral pantoprazole 20 to 80 mg/day (given in the morning before breakfast) induced a dose-related increase in both the 24-h intragastric pH and the serum gastrin profile. The effects of pantoprazole doses of 60 and 80 mg were not significantly different from those of the 40 mg dose. It was concluded that oral pantoprazole at 40 mg/day is the optimal antisecretory dose for the treatment of acid-related diseases. In two comparative studies, this dose of pantoprazole (administered before breakfast) proved to be significantly more effective than ranitidine 300 mg (given in the evening) and omeprazole 20 mg (given in the morning). Administration of oral and intravenous pantoprazole (40 mg) was found to be equipotent at increasing 24-h intragastric pH, but this finding requires further evaluation. The approximately 2-4-fold rise in median serum gastrin concentrations following several days' administration of pantoprazole 40 mg is of a comparable magnitude to that of other proton pump inhibitors. It seems unlikely that this moderate hypergastrinaemia during pantoprazole treatment should influence the human enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell density in a clinically relevant way, but data during long-term therapy are necessary to confirm this conclusion.     

Formulary management of proton pump inhibitors

The management of dyspepsia has been radically altered by the discovery of the role of Helicobacter pylori and the advent of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The use of PPIs alone as antisecretory agents and as part of triple therapy regimens for H. pylori eradication accounts for a significant percentage of any healthcare system's drug budget. Thus, it is important to take into account a variety of factors when devising a formulary and considering which PPIs to include. Consideration of 3 factors are particularly crucial in this process, namely therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and cost but several other clinical and economic parameters should also be considered. The mechanisms of action of all 4 PPIs currently available (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole) are very similar, with any small differences in pharmacological properties unlikely to be of clinical significance. Therapeutic efficacy in patients with acute reflux oesophagitis is again very similar for all 4 PPIs at their standard dosages; all agents are superior to H2-antagonists. Data on maintenance therapy for reflux oesophagitis also suggest similar efficacy for omeprazole and lansoprazole; data on pantoprazole and rabeprazole are awaited. For the treatment of H. pylori-related ulcers, the consensus at present is for PPI-based triple therapy. Again, all PPIs seem equally efficacious for this indication but pantoprazole and rabeprazole have yet to receive licences for H. pylori eradication therapy (HPET) in most countries. Drug tolerability is another critical issue to consider in formulary inclusion decisions. As a class, the PPIs are well tolerated. Minor drug interactions are reported for omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole but not for pantoprazole. However, whether or not this is significant in clinical practice is open to debate. Most of the pharmacoeconomic data in these indicators, to date, relate to omeprazole and, to a lesser extent, lansoprazole. Certainly, the studies on these 2 drugs confirm the superior cost effectiveness of PPIs over H2-antagonists in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and peptic ulceration in both the short and long-terms. Although data are awaited, there is no reason to suggest that this will be any different for pantoprazole and rabeprazole. PPI-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication appears to be the most cost-effective treatment option for H. pylori-related peptic ulcer disease. It is clear that PPIs are superior in several regards to previously used medications in the treatment of dyspepsia. Which PPI(s) to include in a particular formulary is a more difficult decision. On review of many criteria involved in formulary decisions, differences between the individual PPIs appear minimal. The relative acquisition costs of the PPIs vary nationally and internationally and this may be a critical factor in formulary inclusion decisions. However, one should not ignore non-economic factors, as these should form the basis of any sound drug policies.     

Role of pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents many problems, despite the fact that significant advances have been made in recent years in the understanding of its pathogenesis and symptomatology. GERD affects many people and has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life. Heartburn is the most common symptom of GERD which occurs with and without oesophagitis. The predominant causative factor for symptoms is prolonged contact of oesophageal mucosa with refluxed acid and pepsin. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective treatment for GERD: overall proportions of patients with healing and complete heartburn relief are markedly higher with PPIs than with alternative treatment strategies. Furthermore, the speed of healing and heartburn relief with PPIs is almost twice as rapid as with any other form of therapy. The present review focuses on the effectiveness and safety of the PPI, pantoprazole. The data show that the compound is highly effective in GERD patients with and without oesophagitis. Pantoprazole has an excellent safety record and shows only minor interaction with other drugs.     

Role of pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents many problems, despite the fact that significant advances have been made in recent years in the understanding of its pathogenesis and symptomatology. GERD affects many people and has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life. Heartburn is the most common symptom of GERD which occurs with and without oesophagitis. The predominant causative factor for symptoms is prolonged contact of oesophageal mucosa with refluxed acid and pepsin. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective treatment for GERD: overall proportions of patients with healing and complete heartburn relief are markedly higher with PPIs than with alternative treatment strategies. Furthermore, the speed of healing and heartburn relief with PPIs is almost twice as rapid as with any other form of therapy. The present review focuses on the effectiveness and safety of the PPI, pantoprazole. The data show that the compound is highly effective in GERD patients with and without oesophagitis. Pantoprazole has an excellent safety record and shows only minor interaction with other drugs.     

Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders in the US

Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as a single optical isomer. It provides better acid control than current racemic proton pump inhibitors and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole. In large well designed 8-week trials in patients with erosive oesophagitis, esomeprazole recipients achieved significantly higher rates of endoscopically confirmed healed oesophagitis than those receiving omeprazole or lansoprazole. Esomeprazole was effective across all baseline grades of oesophagitis; notably, relative to lansoprazole, as the baseline severity of disease increased, the difference in rates of healed oesophagitis also increased in favour of esomeprazole. In two trials, 94% of patients receiving esomeprazole 40mg once daily achieved healed oesophagitis versus 84 to 87% of omeprazole recipients (20mg once daily). In a study in >5000 patients, respective healed oesophagitis rates with once-daily esomeprazole 40mg or lansoprazole 30mg were 92.6 and 88.8%. Resolution of heartburn was also significantly better with esomeprazole than with these racemic proton pump inhibitors. Long-term (up to 12 months) therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole 20 or 40mg once daily for 4 weeks proved effective in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis. Eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is considered pivotal to successfully managing duodenal ulcer disease. Ten days' triple therapy (esomeprazole 40mg once daily, plus twice-daily amoxicillin 1g and clarithromycin 500mg) eradicated H. pylori in 77 to 78% of patients (intention-to-treat) with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer disease. Esomeprazole is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. The tolerability profile is similar to that of other proton pump inhibitors. Few patients discontinued therapy because of treatment-emergent adverse events (<3% of patients) and very few (<1%) drug-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is an effective and well tolerated treatment for managing GORD and for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. In 8-week double-blind trials, esomeprazole effectively healed oesophagitis and resolved symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis. Notably, in large (n >1900 patients) double-blind trials, esomeprazole provided significantly better efficacy than omeprazole or lansoprazole in terms of both healing rates and resolution of symptoms. Long-term therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole was also effective in patients with symptomatic GORD. Thus, esomeprazole has emerged as an effective option for first-line therapy in the management of acid-related disorders.     

Pantoprazole maintenance therapy prevents relapse of erosive oesophagitis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of pantoprazole with ranitidine for the maintenance of endoscopically documented healed (grade 0 or 1) erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients (371) were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg or ranitidine 150 mg. Endoscopies were performed after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months or when symptoms suggesting relapse (grade = 2) developed. Gastric biopsies were obtained at baseline and on at least one postbaseline visit. Symptom-free days and Gelusil use were assessed. RESULTS: Pantoprazole was significantly (P < 0.001) more effective in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. After 12 months, 33%, 40%, 68% and 82% of patients remained healed for the ranitidine and pantoprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg groups, respectively. Daytime and night-time heartburn were eliminated in > 90% of days for the pantoprazole 40 mg group. Gelusil use was significantly lower with pantoprazole 20 and 40 mg than with ranitidine (P < 0.02) during the first 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of maintenance therapy with pantoprazole (10-40 mg once daily) was superior to ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) in maintaining erosive oesophagitis healing. Pantoprazole 40 mg provided the most consistent efficacy and was well tolerated.     

Comparison of the efficacy of pantoprazole vs. nizatidine in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis: a randomized,active-controlled,double-blind study

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor approved for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole vs. nizatidine for the treatment of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically documented erosive oesophagitis (grade > or = 2). METHODS: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study (221 patients) was performed to compare 20 and 40 mg pantoprazole daily with nizatidine 150 mg b.d. (maximum, 8 weeks). The primary end-point was endoscopic healing of erosive oesophagitis (grade 1 or 0). The secondary end-point was symptomatic improvement. RESULTS: Healing averaged 61%, 64% and 22% for pantoprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and nizatidine 150 mg, respectively, at 4 weeks, and 79%, 83% and 41% at 8 weeks (P < 0.05, differences between groups at both points). Starting on day 1 of symptom assessment, significantly fewer pantoprazole-treated patients reported night-time heartburn and regurgitation compared with nizatidine-treated patients. Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were completely eliminated in 68% and 65% of patients in the pantoprazole 20-mg and 40-mg groups and in 28% of patients in the nizatidine group at study completion. The difference between each pantoprazole group and the nizatidine group was significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole, at single daily doses of 20 mg and 40 mg for up to 8 weeks, provides more rapid relief of symptoms and superior healing of erosive oesophagitis than nizatidine 150 mg b.d., and is well tolerated.     

A review of treatment of duodenal and gastric ulcers--pantoprazole vs. omeprazole.

The efficacy and safety of pantoprazole in the treatment of duodenal and gastric ulcers has been compared with that of the first proton pump inhibitor omeprazole in two (previously reported) clinical studies. Pantoprazole (40 mg/day) administered orally was an effective and well- tolerated treatment for both indications. Pantoprazole was as effective as omeprazole (20 mg/day) and had a similar safety profile. For gastric ulcers, the healing rate with pantoprazole was superior to that with omeprazole at 4 weeks.     

Pantoprazole: from drug metabolism to clinical relevance

BACKGROUND: Conditions requiring inhibition of acid secretion, such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia or the use of NSAIDs, are very common, and their prevalence is expecting to rise as they are seen predominantly amongst the elderly. Among the drugs available to inhibit acid secretion, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been shown to have the best efficacy-safety ratio and have been used widely. OBJECTIVE: This paper was intended to provide an overall presentation of one of these PPIs, pantoprazole. METHOD: This study was first intended to give an overview of pantoprazole, so a Medline search was conducted using pantoprazole as unique search term, without publication date restriction. We found 826 references for pantoprazole and selected some of the most relevant publications to conduct this review. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Five different PPIs are commercially available: omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, lansoprazole and esomeprazole. Pantoprazole differs from other PPIs by a selective binding to the ion transport pathway, a good stability at neutral pH values, and a relatively robust plasma concentration-time curve. These pharmacokinetic differences may not be fully converted into pharmacodynamic differences of pantoprazole versus other PPIs. Pantoprazole has been assessed in most of the clinical situations where acid suppression is required, and showed great efficacy and an excellent safety profile. Some safety concerns were raised with long-term use of PPIs, but they are well balanced by the benefit of PPIs for patients with conditions such as GORD or peptic ulcer.     

Pharmacodynamic comparison of pantoprazole enantiomers: inhibition of acid-related lesions and acid secretion in rats and guinea-pigs

Pantoprazole is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor that is administered as a racemic mixture clinically. The effects of pantoprazole sodium (PAN.Na) enantiomers on acid-related lesions were compared using models of pylorus ligation induced ulcer, histamine induced ulcer and reflux oesophagitis in rats and guinea-pigs. Compared with (+)-PAN.Na and (+/-)-PAN.Na, (-)-PAN.Na showed much stronger inhibitory effects on pylorus ligation induced and histamine induced ulcers, but similar effects on reflux oesophagitis. The doses of (-)-PAN.Na, (+)-PAN.Na and (+/-)-PAN.Na required for 50% inhibition (ID50) of acid-related lesions were 1.28, 5.03 and 3.40 mg kg(-1) against pylorus ligation induced ulcer, 1.20, 4.28 and 3.15 mg kg(-1) against histamine induced ulcer, and 2.92, 3.56 and 3.70 mg kg(-1) against reflux oesophagitis, respectively. The inhibitory effects of PAN.Na enantiomers on basal gastric acid output were compared in rats with acute fistula. In contrast to inhibitory rates of 89.3% and 83.6% on gastric acid output by (-)-PAN.Na and (+/-)-PAN.Na at 1.5 mg kg(-1), (+)-PAN.Na had an inhibitory rate of only 24.7% at the same dose. The above results indicate that (-)-PAN.Na is more potent than (+)-PAN.Na at inhibiting acid-related lesions owing to its stronger inhibition of acid secretion.