Multilevel block in the atrioventricular node during atrial tachycardia and flutter alternating with Wenckebach phenomenon.

The electrocardiograms of 100 patients with rapid and regular PP intervals during atrial arrhythmias (because of atrial tachycardia or flutter, or pacing) were examined for periods of irregular atrioventricular conduction. This irregular conduction corresponds to an alternating Wenckebach phenomenon, of a type that can be determined from simple rules. The different types of conduction encountered in different patients and the changes seen in the same patient suggest that the atrioventricular node functions physiologically with 3 levels of sequential block. The different prevalence of the 2 types of alternating Wenckebach block may reflect functional differences at the level of the atrioventricular node.     

Atrial pacing-induced alternating Wenckebach periodicity and multilevel conduction block in children

Multilevel block within the atrioventricular (AV) node has not been previously described in children. Six children with atrial pacing-induced repetitive block are presented. The conduction patterns satisfy the requisites for alternating Wenckebach periodicity or multilevel AV block. In 2 patients the block is documented in the AV node and infra-His region. In 4 patients multilevel block within the AV node is postulated by deductive reasoning. In this study, 2 patterns of alternating Wenckebach periodicity are reported for the first time: sequences of 3:1 block with progressive prolongation of the conducted impulses terminating in 4:1 block; and sequences of 2:1 block with progressive prolongation of the conducted impulses terminating in 2 series of 3:1 block, in which the first conducted impulse following the first 2 blocked beats is not the shortest one, whereas that following the second 2 blocked beats is the shortest.     

Prediction of complex atrioventricular conduction rhythms in humans with use of the atrioventricular nodal recovery curve

Theoretical considerations indicate that complex patterns of atrioventricular conduction produced by rapid atrial stimulation can be predicted from changes in atrioventricular conduction produced by premature stimulation of the atrium. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this theoretical approach in seven patients undergoing electrophysiologic investigation. The atrioventricular nodal recovery curve was determined at two different basic cycle lengths. Subsequently, periodic atrial stimulation was delivered for 30 sec periods over a range of frequencies giving 11, Wenckebach, reverse Wenckebach, and 21 rhythms. The recovery curve data was then used to compute the response to periodic stimulation by an iterative technique. The conduction patterns actually seen during periodic atrial stimulation showed close agreement with the computed patterns. This work thus provides a unified explanation for the appearance of Wenckebach, reverse Wenckebach, alternating Wenckebach, and high grade block rhythms.     

Reverse alternating Wenckebach periodicity

An atrial pacing-induced reverse conduction pattern of the alternating Wenckebach periodicity was observed in 5 of 42 children (12%) during electrophysiologic study. This conduction pattern is a reverse of the usual alternating Wenckebach periodicity: During an underlying 2:1 atrioventricular conduction block there is progressive shortening of the conduction time of the conducted impulses with termination in a lower degree of block. This reverse alternating Wenckebach periodicity may be caused by a mechanism similar to that in other Wenckebach phenomena.     

Alternative mechanisms of apparent supernormal atrioventricular conduction

Alternative mechanisms were found to explain several different electrocardiographic examples of apparent supernormal atrioventricular (A-V) conduction in man using programmed premature atrial and ventricular stimulation and His bundle recordings. Sudden shortening of the P-R interval during A-V nodal Wenckebach phenomenon was due to manifest or concealed reentry within the A-V node. Gap phenomena in which late atrial premature depolarizations blocked while earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted were shown to result from delay of earlier atrial premature depolarizations in the A-V node (type I gap) or in the His-Purkinje system (type II gap). Mechanisms analogous to the latter were found in cases of apparent supernormality of intraventricular conduction: Late atrial premature depolarizations resulted in aberration whereas earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted normally because of delay within the A-V node or His-Purkinje system. Unexpected normalization of a bundle branch block pattern also resulted from Wenckebach phenomenon in the bundle branches. Atypical Wenckebach phenomenon with the first beat of the period demonstrated that aberration was due to phase 4 depolarization. Preexcitation of the ventricle before the delivery of a previously blocked atrial premature depolarization allowed conduction through the area of block (A-V node) because of earlier depolarization of the latter with earlier recovery. In the His-Purkinje system, 2:1 A-V block was converted to 1:1 conduction when a premature ventricular depolarization shortened the refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system.     

Mobitz type II suprahisian atrioventricular block : block in the subnodal-suprahisian (NH) zone?

The electrophysiological properties of the atrioventricular node differ from those of the His bundle. Nodal conduction is always decremential; this is its principal physiological characteristic, and accounts for the fact that almost the only form of block found at this level is Wenckebach block. The His bundle is characterised by an all-or-nothing response and usually blocks in the Mobitz II mode. Wenckebach phenomena have been described in the His Purkinje system, but Mobitz II block has not been reported in the atrioventricular node. Similarly, phase IV paradoxical block is found in the His Purkinje system but has not been described in the atrioventricular node in the absence of vagal phenomena. In addition, the atrioventricular node is very sensitive to the influence of the autonomic nervous system, the His bundle much less so. The first patient had a normal resting electrocardiogram showing sinus rhythm; second degree atrioventricular block was observed when the atrial rhythm was increased by exercise, atropine or atrial pacing. His bundle recordings showed the block to be suprahisian; the blocked atrial potentials were not followed by a His potential, whilst the conducted atrial activity was followed by a normal His potential and a normal HV interval. However, this atrioventricular block was of the Mobitz II and not the expected Mobitz I type, conduction to the ventricles suddenly blocking (with a 3/2 or 2/1 response) when the atrial rate was increased, without obvious lengthening of the PR or AH intervals before the blocked atria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

病态窦房结综合征患者房室传导功能分析

为了解病态窦房结综合征患者的房室传导功能,用食管电生理检查观察窦房结功能正常者86例、窦房结功能低下者40例和病态窦房结综合征者109例的房室传导功能.结果显示:3组的文氏型阻滞点、2:1阻滞点差异无显著意义(P>0.05).将窦房结功能障碍者的窦房结恢复时间与文氏型阻滞点、2:1阻滞点作相关分析,结果均无相关性(P>0.05).认为病态窦房结综合征发生房室传导阻滞的概率较低,植入起搏器前应作食管心房调搏检查房室传导系统功能.     

Functional abnormalities of the conduction system in children with an atrial septal defect

We performed an electrophysiologic study in 40 children with an atrial septal defect and analyzed their pre- and postoperative electrocardiograms and 24-hour Holter recordings. The electrophysiologic study showed a prolonged corrected sinus node recovery time in 83% and an abnormal sinuatrial conduction time in 25% of the children. An early Wenckebach response to atrial pacing was seen in 18%. Sixteen percent had a prolonged atrial conduction time. The atrial functional refractory period was abnormal in 35%. Two children developed nonsustained supraventricular tachycardia during the electrophysiologic study. The preoperative electrocardiogram showed first-degree atrioventricular block in 15% of the children; prolonged periods of accelerated atrial rhythm were found in 35% of the preoperative 24-hour Holter recordings. The incidence of first-degree atrioventricular block and accelerated atrial rhythm decreased postoperatively. We could not find a significant correlation between age or shunt size and the presence of electrophysiologic abnormalities or arrhythmias. These results indicate that the sinus node, atrioventricular node and atrial myocardium show some degree of dysfunction in patients with an atrial septal defect. An early operation may prevent further progression of electrophysiologic abnormalities and the development of symptomatic arrhythmias.     

Electrocardiographic manifestations and clinical significance of atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckbach periods

Atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckebach periods were defined as episodes of 2:1 atrioventricular block in which there was a gradual increase in transmission intervals of conducted beats ending in two or three consecutively blocked atrial impulses. This is one of the mechanisms whereby 2:1 atrioventricular block progresses into 3:1 or 4:1 atrioventricular block. Alternating Wenckebach periods appear during rapid atrial pac,ng (even in the absence of depressed atrioventricular nodal function), provided that the atria can be captured at a rate fast enough to allow for the occurrence of this phenomenon. Treatment of atrial flutter with digoxin and quinidine produces alternating Wenckebach's periods, with associated electrocardiographic changes specific for the type of drug given. In patients with "atrial tachycardia with atrioventricular block" due to digitalis intoxication or with primary disease of the conducting system or with acute myocardial infarction, there are coexisting severe arrhythmias and clinical symptoms requiring almost immediate pharmacologic or electrical therapy. We conclude that atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckebach's periods are common and frequentyly transient and that they occur in a variety of clinical conditions, most of which are benign; however, contrary to what is commonly accepted, some episodes appear in clinical settings requiring prompt pharmacologic or electrical treatment.     

心房扑动伴交替性文氏现象的心电图与临床分析

目的：探讨心房扑动伴交替性文氏现象的心电图特点与临床意义。方法回顾性分析13例心房扑动伴交替性文氏现象患者的临床资料。根据心电图表现,将这13例患者分为 A、B 两型。结果13例患者中10例患器质性心脏病,3例为非器质性心脏病患者。10例器质性心脏病患者中有7例经胺碘酮或普罗帕酮复律转为窦性心律时,仍存在一度房室阻滞或二度Ⅰ型房室阻滞,提示此7例交替性文氏现象多为病理性阻滞;3例非器质性心脏病患者中有2例（肺炎、创伤性颅脑损伤）恢复窦性心律未见房室阻滞,提示为功能性阻滞。所有患者均获临床治愈或好转出院。结论心房扑动伴交替性文氏现象为房室结双层阻滞,B 型略多于 A 型。该现象如果见于器质性心脏病患者,恢复窦性心律多数存在房室阻滞,提示可能为病理性阻滞。如果为病理性阻滞,应用抗心律失常药物时应适当减量,以免发生高度或三度房室阻滞。     

Implications of marked fatty infiltration around and in the atrophic atrioventricular node in elderly patients with permanent pacemaker implantation for symptomatic sick sinus syndrome

The present study undertook an extensive analysis of the histopathological findings of the atrioventricular conduction system in 14 elderly patients treated with permanent pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Special attention was given to the lowest Wenckebach block points of atrioventricular conduction during rapid atrial pacing, and ventricular rate or duration of ventricular pause during chronic atrial fibrillation. An electrophysiological study (EPS) was conducted under sinus rhythm in 13 patients and under junctional escape rhythm in 1 patient. Three of the 14 cases showed a lower Wenckebach block point of 130 beats/min or less. Two of these 3 cases showed excessive fatty infiltration around the atrionodal junction area and into the atrophic atrioventricular node (AVN) itself. Of the 6 patients who had chronic atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation, 2 cases showed a slow ventricular response of less than 60 beats/min and/or a long ventricular pause of 3.3 s. One of the 2 cases showed a lower Wenckebach block point of 130 beats/min at the time of EPS. The other, who later progressed to idiopathic atriomegaly, also showed marked fatty infiltration around the AVN. This fatty lesion was closely associated with diffuse disruption of the muscular fibers connecting the atrophic AVN with the atrium. In addition, most of the remaining cases also had an atrophic AVN. In conclusion, a sparse or absent atrionodal connection and an atrophic AVN due to excessive fatty infiltration in the atrionodal transitional area should be investigated in atrioventricular conduction disturbances in the elderly with SSS.     

Alternating Wenckebach periods occurring in the atria, His-Purkinje system, ventricles and kent bundle

Alternating Wenckebach periods were defined as episodes of 2:1 block during which there was a gradual prolongation of the transmission intervals preceding the appearance of 3:1 or 4:1 block. Alternating Wenckebach periods occurring within the His-Purkinje system in symptomatic patients with right bundle branch block could have resulted from involvement of the His bundle only, the left bundle branch only or both structures simultaneously. Alternating Wenckebach patterns presumably occurring in the reentry pathway of ventricular extrasystoles and in the tissues surrounding an ectopic atrial focus or bipolar pacing electrodes were manifested in the coupling intervals of the premature beats; in the P-P intervals of atrial tachycardia with atrioventricular (A-V) block due to digitalis; and in the stimulus (St)-A intervals following electrical stimuli delivered to the atria at fast rates. Alternating Wenckebach periods of St-H and St-delta wave intervals in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome resulted from involvement of the Kent bundle itself, or of the atria as a proximal level common to distal longitudinally dissociated structures (Kent bundle and A-V node).

It is concluded that contrary to what is commonly believed alternating Wenckebach periods may be a tachycardia-dependent phenomenon occurring above, below or outside the A-V node and explaining a variety of spontaneous or electrically induced arrhythmias whose significance depends on the clinical setting in which they occur.     

Mechanisms and dynamics of episodes of progression of 2:1 atrioventricular block in patients with documented two-level conduction disturbances.

Twenty episodes of progression of 2:1 atrioventricular (AV) block were identified during incremental atrial stimulation in 7 patients with documented (2-level) block in the AV node and His-Purkinje system. All occurred at cycle lengths shorter than those at which stable 2:1 HV block had been detected. Thirteen episodes were typical since 2:1 increased to 3:1 AV block when an atrio-His (AH) Wenckebach period was completed with an atrial impulse that otherwise would have been conducted. These episodes occurred with dynamic A(M): V(N) ratios similar to those seen at the AV node. Seven atypical episodes were identified (while AH Wenckebach periods were occurring): (1) 2:1 increasing to 3:1 AV block and then to 4:1 AV block resulting from prolonged refractoriness in the His-Purkinje system subsequently followed by concealed conduction in the latter structure; (2) conversion of 3:2 directly into 3:1 AV block due to block of the next-to-last atrial impulse in the His-Purkinje system with completion of AH Wenckebach period with the following atrial impulse; and (3) 4:2 AV block presumably due to supernormal conduction in a transversely dissociated His-Purkinje system. These episodes occurred with A(M): V(N) ratios, which in other structures would have been indicative of different degrees of AV block. In conclusion, progression of 2:1 AV block during documented 2 level conduction disturbances (1) can be explained by mechanisms different than those currently known, and (2) has rich, but different dynamics from those observed exclusively in the AV node and exclusively in the His-Purkinje system.     

Conduction abnormalities detected by electrophysiologic testing following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect

Since 1983 we have performed electrophysiologic studies in 6 patients who had previously undergone repair of an ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect. Information obtained during electrophysiologic studies was crucial in guiding appropriate pacemaker therapy in these patients. As judged from the resting electrocardiogram, sinus or junctional bradycardia was present in 3/6, atrial flutter / fibrillation in 2/6, and paced rhythm in 2 patients who had had ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete atrioventricular block. During maximal exercise testing 4 patients had reduced heart rates; 2 had sudden drops in heart rate at 1 min postexercise; 1 patient had exercise induced ventricular bigeminy; and 1 patient with atrial flutter and 2: 1-4: 1 block at rest developed 1: 1 conduction during Stage II with an effective ventricular rate of 220/min. During electrophysiologic studies, the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time was abnormal in five of the six, ranging from 410 to 5630 msec. There was no spontaneous atrial rhythm in the other patient. Complete atrioventricular block was present in 2 patients while the atrioventricular Wenckebach phenomenon occurred abnormally at atrial pacing cycle lengths greater than 450 msec in 2 others. Supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter/fibrillation, was either spontaneous or induced in 2/6 patients, while ventricular tachycardia was induced in 1/3 patients who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Electrophysiologic studies were important in unmasking severe sinus node disease in 3 patients and atrioventricular node disease in 2. We therefore recommend that electrophysiologic studies be strongly considered as part of the evaluation of conduction abnormalities following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect.     

Double Wenckebach phenomenon in atrioventricular node and His bundle. Electrophysiological demonstration in a case of atrial flutter.

In a case of atrial flutter with a 9:2 atrioventricular response, the only possible way to explain the conduction pattern was 3:1 block in the atrioventicular node (which is 3:2 Wenckebach sequence in the N zone and a 2:1 block at the junction of the node with the bundle of His) plus 3:2 Wenckebach sequence distal to the H deflection. The recording of the His bundle deflection confirmed this analysis.     

Unique electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with different ventriculoatrial block patterns: Effects of slow pathway ablation and insights into the location of the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic mechanisms of different ventriculoatrial (VA) block patterns during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize AVNRTs with different VA block patterns and to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation. METHODS: Electrophysiologic data from six AVNRT patients with different VA block patterns were reviewed. RESULTS: All AVNRTs were induced after a sudden AH "jump-up" with the earliest retrograde atrial activation at the right superoparaseptum. Different VA block patterns comprised Wenckebach His-atrial (HA) block (n = 4), 2:1 HA block (n = 1), and variable HA conduction times during fixed AVNRT cycle length (CL) (n = 1). Wenckebach HA block during AVNRT was preceded by gradual HA interval prolongation with fixed His-His (HH) interval and unchanged atrial activation sequence. AVNRT with 2:1 HA block was induced after slow pathway ablation for slow-slow AVNRT with 1:1 HA conduction, and earliest atrial activation shifted from right inferoparaseptum to superoparaseptum without change in AVNRT CL. The presence of a lower common pathway was suggested by a longer HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL than during AVNRT (n = 5) or Wenckebach HA block during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL (n = 1). In four patients, HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL was unusually long (188 +/- 30 ms). Ablations at the right inferoparaseptum rendered AVNRT noninducible in 5 (83%) of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Most AVNRTs with different VA block patterns were amenable to classic slow pathway ablation. The reentrant circuit could be contained within a functionally protected region around the AV node and posterior nodal extensions, and different VA block patterns resulted from variable conduction at tissues extrinsic to the reentrant circuit.     

Paroxysmal Mobitz type-I atrioventricular block Luciani-Wenckebach conduction, acute myocardial infarction and severe three vessels coronary artery disease

Paroxysmal atrioventricular block has been reported in patients without acute coronary syndrome and without significant coronary artery stenosis, in patients with acute coronary syndrome and without significant coronary artery stenosis, in patients without acute coronary syndrome and with significant coronary artery stenosis and in patients with acute coronary syndrome and significant coronary artery stenosis. Conflicting roles for alternating periods of second degree atrioventricular block (also known as Mobitz I or Luciani-Wenckebach periodicity) have been reported. Both hypotheses have been reported, that paroxysmal Wenckebach periods are compatible with a benign prognosis and that paroxysmal Wenckebach periods are associated with hemodynamic deterioration. We present a case of paroxysmal Mobitz Type-I atrioventricular block Luciani-Wenckebach conduction in a 75-year-old Italian man with acute myocardial infarction and severe three vessels coronary artery disease.     

Atrioventricular block at nodal and infrahissian level during atrial tachycardia. Apropos of a case]

The authors report the case of a patient with atrial tachycardia and surface electrocardiographic signs of left anterior hemiblock and complete right bundle branch block with 10/3 atrioventricular block. The regularity of the RR intervals which were an exact multiple of the atrial cycle suggested the absence of a Wenckebach phenomenon. The sequence of atrioventricular conduction cannot be explained by classical models of intranodal conduction. Endocavitary recordings confirmed this hypothesis. They showed block at 2 levels: supra- and infrahisian. The suprahisian block functioned in the 2/1 mode and the infrahisian block in the 5/3 mode without incremental conduction distal to the His potential before the apparition of block. A double zone of intrahisian block could explain the observed sequence of atrioventricular conduction. The absence of Wenckebach phenomenon on the surface ECG during tachycardia could be a sign of infrahisian block. The authors suggest that the association of this sequence of atrioventricular conduction with intraventricular conduction defects is a formal indication for electrophysiological studies.     

Alternating Wenckebach periodicity: A common electrophysiologic response.

Alternating Wenckebach periods are defined as episodes of 2:1 atrioventricular (A-V) block in which conducted P-R intervals progressively prolong, terminating in two or three blocked P waves. In this study, His bundle recordings were obtained in 13 patients with pacing-induced alternating Wenckebach periods. Three patterns were noted: Pattern 1 (one patient with a narrow QRS complex) was characterized by 2:1 block distal to the H deflection (block in the His bundle) and Wenckebach periods proximal to the H deflection, terminating with two blocked P waves. Pattern 2 (four patients) was characterized by alternating Wenckebach periods proximal to the His bundle, terminating with three blocked P waves. Pattern 3 (eight patients) was characterized by alternating Wenckebach periods proximal to the His bundle, terminating with two blocked P waves. Alternating Wenckebach periods are best explained by postulating two levels of block. When alternating Wenckebach periods are terminated by three blocked P waves (pattern 2), the condition may be explained by postulating 2:1 block (proximal level) and type I block (distal level). When alternating Wenckebach periods are terminated by two blocked P waves (patterns 1 and 3), the condition may be explained by postulating type I block (proximal level) and 2:1 block (distal level). Pattern 1 reflects block at two levels, the A-V node and His bundle. Patterns 2 and 3 most likely reflect horizontal dissociation within the A-V node.     

Atrioventricular alternating Wenckebach periodicity: conduction patterns in multilevel block

Atrioventricular (A-V) conduction patterns were analyzed in three patients with atrial pacing-induced alternating Wenckebach periodicity. These cases were unique because in each (1) separate levels of block responsible for the conduction disturbance were located above and below the His bundle recording site, and (2) there were several departures from the simple alternating Wenckebach pattern. Apparent supernormal conduction, temporary 1:1 conduction and a specific form of gap in A-V conduction resulted from the interplay of many factors including a simple mathematic relation of the blocking ratio at the two levels, the characteristics of the Wenckebach cycles, and the cycle length-dependent features of refractory periods at the different sites. The findings indicate that (1) delay in proximal impulse transmission is usually the critical factor in overcoming prolonged distal refractoriness and producing variable conduction patterns during the course of alternating Wenckebach periodicity; (2) many irregularities in alternating Wenckebach periodicity can be explained by known electrophysiologic mechanisms; and (3) simple mathematic equations alone are too rigid to reflect properly the dynamic process underlying this conduction disturbance.